TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

faithle55 Archive

View 0 posts and 263 comments by faithle55 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm off. I suppose I should expect this sort of response in /r/MensRights. Toodle-oo
/r/MensRights24/04/24 08:21 AM
1

I'm off. I suppose I should expect this sort of response in /r/MensRights. Toodle-oo
/r/MensRights24/04/24 08:21 AM
1

We have a two-tier criminal justice system in the UK with regard to seriousness of crimes. We have indictable offences (used to be called 'felonies') and those are tried in a Crown Court with a jury. Then we have summary offences (used to be 'misdemeanours') and they are tried in a magistrates court without a jury. There's a third category - jokingly called 'flopppers' by lawyers, which will be tried in the mags unless the accused exercises a right to be tried in the Crown Court. Magistrates cou…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 09:35 AM
0

You have what we call a King Charle's head. (Google it, if you like.) You're viewing everything from a misogynist, male-vs-female perspective. The Court doesn't do that. Specifically in this area of mitigation of offences, the mitigation factor is the welfare of the child/children. If you try to understand that, you'll see that the gender of the parent doesn't matter. It can also be a mitigating factor if a man is the sole breadwinner of a family with a child, where if sending him to prison woul…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 09:24 AM
-2

I cannot refer you to any because cases like this are not reported in the Law Reports, and unless the newspapers report them they will remain unknown. Of course the newspapers only report the most annoying cases because advertising. Plus, there aren't that many men who are sole or main carer, so there's that.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:46 PM
-1

Yeah, the English judicial system is not as strong on vindictiveness as Americans like their law to be. Which is how I like it.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:29 PM
-1

Doh! Ya got me. 3 hours a week.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:28 PM
-10

Well, it IS a factor in sentencing. It's part of the mitigation package. All judges/DJs/magistrates have to take aggravating and mitigating factors into account when determining whereabouts within the range of available sentences the case in front of them should fall. Being a good father is not really mitigation for a serial killer and torturer, for what it's worth, nor for Mafia hitmen.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:27 PM
-4

I'm a retired UK lawyer. The fact of being the sole carer or main carer of a child or children is a mitigating factor. The mitigation calculation does not depend on the gender of the offender.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:24 PM
-5

It rather depends on what arrangements they have made for the kid(s), doesn't it?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 09:23 PM
2

I wonder however if a single father who committed a similar offence would be granted the “no separation from child” defence. Yes, of course. When considering this factor it's the welfare of the child that the court is considering. It will only ever tip the balance, it will never be the whole of the decision.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:20 PM
-68

It doesn't say she pushed her glass into his face, it says she struck his face with the glass.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:19 PM
26

Good mothers don’t glass random people when they’re out pissed). What an utterly sententious assertion.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:19 PM
-24

It's because she's the caregiver of a child. Courts routinely hand out non-custodial sentences in these situations. Contrary to what is said below, if a male was sole or main caregiver of a child that would have the same result. As it is, she was sentenced to 12 months prison but suspended for 12 months. Any offence at all within a year (except speeding offences and the like) and she'll be in to serve the 12 months. Also, 180 hours of community service. That will have to be done within that year…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:17 PM
1

I was writing a post about how someone who behaves like this girl did must be mentally unwell, and that more severe punishment is unlikely to produce a better outcome than less severe punishment, and that punishment without treatment or similar won't produce a good outcome at all. But I ended up writing a treatise on criminology so I'm posting this instead.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 12:07 PM
1

I was involved - as a student - with a case in which the husband invented a disclosure, by his daughter, that she had been sexually abused by the maternal grandfather. It was fabricated - even his own legal team knew that, because the last time he'd been with his daughter was three months before, and the children had been living with their mother in the grandparents farmhouse. No-one believed he'd wait three months before telling anyone about the disclosure. Admittedly, he was desperate, and had…
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:56 PM
5

I'll tell you my experience of family law. The men generally lie their bloody heads off about their money. The women generally lie their bloody heads off to get custody of the kids. The court is, in the long run, not much better than anybody else at working out who is telling the truth and hence nobody generally is happy about the outcomes.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 04:38 PM
2

Typically these types of AI tools are initially loaded with data from the last ten years or so of decisions taken by human beings. That's how the bias gets into the AI. It compares current candidates with previous positions and inadvertently applies the same biases.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 09:11 AM
1

...plus the boyfriend turned up with a posse. Even if there was nothing going on, I'd skedaddle because if people get the wrong end of the stick there's no talking them out of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/21 11:51 AM
2

What I treasure about reddit is the ability to have interesting discussions with people who know more than me or have a different point of view. You aren't one of them.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 05:54 AM
-2

The problem we have is that you want to vent your spleen on Amber Heard whereas I have made it quite clear that I disapprove of this sort of public vindictiveness as a general proposition.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 06:35 AM
-4

No, the public shouldn't see any of this, it should not be in her power to release the bits she likes nor should it be in anyone else's power to release the other bits. This is just a personal view about the generality of these sorts of disputes, not because I'm taking sides.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 06:14 AM
-4

No, I just think everybody has a right to a personal life, and I don't like to see that being eroded even when it's celebrities involved. In the UK court disputes involving family and children matters are all private, and while there are some problems with that, I prefer it to having video tapes like this being seen in public and posted on the internet. It's intrusive. I recognise that with Amber Heard it's something of the biter bit, given the publicity she got for her original accusations agai…
/r/MensRights18/03/20 06:12 AM
-19

It's really shitty that this stuff is being posted on the internet. I know she opened her yap and made it all public in the first place but this is really objectionable.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:16 PM
5

Those objections are bloody ridiculous. How can a question be 'argumentative' and 'vague' at the same time? On the other hand, fancy asking a lay person 'did you do something which would constitute a criminal offence'?
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:07 PM
2

Maybe she was infuriated by HOW MUCH GODDAMN SHIT YOU HAVE TO MOVE to get in that fucking bed and go to sleep.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/19 11:05 AM
-54

Then what's the point of his remark?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 06:44 PM
-34

What, you have done research on whether women do this more often than men? You're a fucking joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 06:44 PM
-95

She's a pain in the arse. But the comments in this thread are atrocious.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 06:43 PM
-52

I think I'm gonna filter this thread. It's full of comments from nasty entitled male assholes. Most of whom would be whining like fuck if they were in the same position as this woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 06:40 PM
-180

This is a common thing for women. What are you, 12? Men do this just as much.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/19 06:38 PM
1

'Do you think maybe what are related'?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/19 07:26 AM
2

Just treat her to an air ticket, FFS. Or put her on a 737 Max 8.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/19 06:59 PM
-9

rancid-crotch shrews What an unpleasant cunt you are.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/19 06:58 AM
1

You're totally right! My mistake. I will take my internet punishment in the form of downvotes.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/19 09:05 AM
2

No worries. Always pleasant to meet civility online!
/r/MensRights17/12/18 10:30 PM
5

I can hardly be bothered, really. However. My point is that women cannot compel men to take sole responsibility for the child; and that this is what would be the equivalent of men disclaiming responsibility for the child as suggested by OP. Suggesting that that is the equivalent of terminating the pregnancy is wrong.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 08:19 PM
-7

That's not what I wrote. I wrote that the woman can decide that the man will have sole responsibility. English is a useful language once you learn its intricacies.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 08:10 PM
-14

No it isn't.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:56 PM
-15

You can have it when the woman also has the right to decide that she is going through to term but the man is going to have to take sole responsibility for the child from the moment of birth.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:21 PM
7

So you're saying that this would be OK if the man in question was simply in construction, rather than being a vet?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 03:06 PM
10

Oh, you haven't come across 'numpty' before? It's British, and it's not that bad as far as insults go. You might call a sibling or a co-worker a numpty without having any ill-will. It's... light-hearted, I suppose.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:48 AM
0

What?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:30 AM
8

No. All I know about you is that you didn't communicate very well.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:19 AM
1

OK, no worries. Happens to us all.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:19 AM
8

You need to work on your communication skills.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:13 AM
3

As a general rule, sentences in the UK are concurrent. Only if there are specific aggravating factors, or if it is a serious of actions (as opposed to one course of action that constitutes several offences) will they be consecutive.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:12 AM
0

Life. But the starting point, for a first offence with no aggravating factors, is 5 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:10 AM
2

Life. But the starting point, for a first offence with no aggravating factors, is 5 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:10 AM
6

For a man convicted of a first offence of rape in the UK, and provided there are no aggravating factors - such as bodily injury, etc. - will get about 5 years. So 4 years for her is not out of order.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:10 AM
7

She'll have a criminal record for offences of fraud, violence and perverting the course of justice. Of course her life won't go back to normal, you numpty.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:07 AM
-18

A man accused of rape gets no sentence at all - until he's convicted. In the UK sentencing guidelines for rape are from 5 years (first offence) to life.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:06 AM
3

A man accused of rape gets no sentence at all - until he's convicted. In the UK sentencing guidelines for rape are from 5 years (first offence) to life.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:06 AM
5

Judge is obviously not a fan of Hibernia.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:04 AM
1

"...payed..." LOL. You weren't kidding. She's bang to rights; it's either think up something that might result in an acquittal, or plead guilty. Nobody believed Peter Sutcliffe heard voices from a grave in a cemetery.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:03 AM
14

She will serve at least 2 years, and then - unless she misbehaves in prison - be on licence for the remaining two years. This is true of all sentences of 4 years or less. More than 4 years and you have to serve 2/3 and be on licence for the remainder.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:02 AM
1

Just to be clear: Contrary to the crappy (but par for the course) DM journalism, the barrister did not "blame" the offences on her upbringing. That would have been part of the 'plea in mitigation'. In sentencing, the court is required to have regard to aggravating and mitigating circumstances in determining the appropriate punishment. The defence will pray in aid any factors which might lead the court to pass a more lenient sentence.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/18 12:00 AM
1

I see you don't know what trolling is either.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/18 06:55 AM
1

Yea so why are you so hard up defending her and making excuses for someone that has entirely no consequence to your life? Same reasons as you have for your posts, I would guess. redditors can be vengeful and harsh in their judgments based on a couple of sentences or 30 seconds of video. I try to introduce a little balance.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/18 12:06 AM
1

You've moved for non-employment reasons from one country to another 5 times? Really? BTW, since you appear to have missed the point of the discussion, it's not me in Turkey, it's the woman in the video.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/18 10:08 PM
1

What an incredibly dumb comment. I'm not saying that to be antagonistic, but have you noticed how much hatred and ill-will there is towards immigrants these days? Quite apart from how logistically and emotionally difficult it is to uproot yourself from your home country and go somewhere else. Sheesh.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/18 09:52 PM
-11

...if your toddler was living in a fascist dictatorship and had seen his friends and colleagues being fired and rounded up and imprisoned over the last five years or so and this was the straw that broke the camel's back.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/18 11:45 PM
-10

It's dangerous to assume that you understand what is going on when people are from a completely different environment. Read this, and tell me how you would enjoy life as a teacher in Turkey.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/18 11:33 PM
1

nutcracker sweet?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/18 07:18 AM
6

Guards uniform: £thousands. Medieval palace: £millions Look on her face as she nearly falls over: priceless.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/18 07:13 AM
2

Too right.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/18 06:03 PM
-1

Well, 1 implies 2, obviously.
/r/MGTOW06/10/18 08:45 AM
-8

There is evidence. (Goddamn, I'm tired of having to point this out.) The most important evidence in any trial is the evidence of the witnesses, which includes the accuser and the accused.
/r/MGTOW06/10/18 08:44 AM
3

Boys need protecting from monsters like that....
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/18 07:06 AM
2

Oh, how frustrating! Can't get the time off work.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 09:01 PM
2

Now I'm a sociopath? You are so funny. This is hugely entertaining. What have you got next for me?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:48 PM
2

Are you ill?
/r/MensRights31/08/18 06:12 PM
2

ORLY? Whose foible am I? foible [ˈfɔɪb(ə)l] NOUN a minor weakness or eccentricity in someone's character.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 03:03 PM
3

Not sure of the thinking behind your decision to be even more acidly condescending in your follow-up post....
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:12 PM
3

No. I prefer that people don't try to use language as a way of imposing their personal wishes on the rest of society. In so doing they are, of course, trying to control the way the rest of society thinks. This is the same thing - although of course for dissimilar motives - as Trump calling everything he doesn't like 'fake news'.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:52 AM
1

No. I'm the type that makes his own mind up about issues that other people are trying to squeeze into conventions where they don't fit. PS I hope the people you teach don't see the acidic, condescending side of you that you show here.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:49 AM
3

You say that like it's some kind of dismissive conclusion. Get stuffed. I will try to stop people abusing the English language as often, whenever, and wherever, I choose to do so. You can deal with that.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:14 PM
6

No, you're wrong. It's the abuse of language that bothers me. I don't give a tuppenny toss what people get up to in their private lives, and I haven't done since I shared dormitories with gay teenagers at school. And I also have always objected to the use of 'they' as an indeterminate pronoun. It can almost always be replaced with 'he', 'she', or 'he or she'.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:51 PM
1

'...who prefers non-gendered pronouns' That's 'it' then, isn't it? He, she, it is how it goes. So how come the article uses 'they'? That's a plural pronoun.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:49 PM
3

And he got off because liberals wanted to send a message to Trump Oh, fuck off. Just fuck right off. Nobody takes decisions like that - acquittal on charges of manslaughter, whatever - because they want to "send a message" to anybody. That's delusional. Although, having thought about it, you clearly consider other people do it so it's probably something you would do. That seems to be a theme with some people; they assume that everybody else is just as big of a prejudiced arsehole as themselves.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 04:52 PM
1

It is my personal belief that women tend to hold the belief that men are their moral inferiors. You're either a teenager, or an idiot. (Or both.) Sorry about the ad hominem attacks, but if you espouse such barking nonsensical views, you gotta expect it. I cannot count the number of women I have encountered closely in my life, but it must be hundreds. Your statements do not apply to any of them. Maybe all the women you've encountered are your moral superiors, but if so that's a problem you need t…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 04:45 PM
1

I don't think it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:09 PM
1

For crying out loud, think like an adult. What's 'male' about using subterfuge and deceit to have sex with someone else? Do you think it's acceptable to do that?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:07 PM
1

It's quite touching, really, all this concern for my professional well-being. Clueless concern, but clueless nonetheless. Sorry about the word salad. Next time I lacerate the vengeful minds on this sub, I'll use shorter words.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:46 PM
1

Uh-huh. Right. There's no argument to be won, here. I'm just trying to get people to think and write less vengeful and mean.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:35 PM
1

"Playing the victim"? How?
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:00 PM
1

I'll take your word for it.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:59 PM
0

Smarmy.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:56 PM
1

I understand your point. I don't know about the USA, but in the UK you get tried according to the law as it was when the crime was committed. I feel reasonably certain that it's the same in the US. I don't think it's reasonable to say that drugging women so you could fuck them without their express consent was considered wrong even in the 1970s. An important question is the quality of evidence after 30 years, which is often overlooked. I would find it really hard to come up with convincing rebut…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:55 PM
1

Here's the problem. Everybody is entitled, as a matter of law, to be treated honestly by everyone they meet. As a matter of law, you are not required to be on your guard all the time. As a matter of law, you do not have to refrain from making allegations of criminal conduct (or other wrongdoing) against someone because they fooled you. There are good reasons why this is, and most reasonably smart people can work them out for themselves with a little bit of thought. So, if someone gives you three…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:56 PM
1

Your presence is welcome. Are you agreeing with the other guys too? :D
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:45 PM
1

It bothers me how fatuous people can be online. Why would I be 'pretending' anything? I might be wrong, I might be right. But don't assume things about me when the simple position is - I differ from you.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:42 PM
1

I can't keep up conversations with people as undisciplined as you. I'm not an asshole because I'm disagreeing with everybody and not being genteel about it. I don't think the 'brother' thing is the cream-de-la-crème (or even la crème de la crème) of comebacks, it's mocking the feeble post to which it was a reply.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:41 PM
1

You know how Trump and his minions use - wrongly - the label 'fake news' whenever things happen that they wish the media wouldn't ask about? This is the way 'trolling' is used on this sub - or at least, on this thread. I'm disagreeing with you, and criticising you for being obnoxious, spiteful, and vengeful. You don't like it, and it's making you angry - but that doesn't make it trolling. And if that's the best lawyer insult you can come up with, then I'm disappointed in you. Come on, that's not…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 11:38 AM
1

Is that so? I've given it a few seconds thought, and you're mistaken. I do know what it means, and I used it correctly.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 11:33 AM
-1

I don't know where to start. Recent posts in reddit have pointed out that it takes no effort to be make nonsensical arguments but can take a lot of effort to rebut and this is such an occasion.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 11:29 AM
1

Whatever. What I'm hoping is that some of the people who read this thread and might otherwise slip into the misogyny that oozes like slime from the comments, might read what I've written and think: "I sorta see what he's getting at. There are other ways of thinking about this." Perhaps it's a vain hope, but it's my hope nevertheless.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:01 AM
1

Read the content of my posts. It's not about the insults, they're just leakage from my disappointment.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:00 AM
1

I haven't written word one about how successful I am. I just said I'm a lawyer, and I've been involved in cases which helped make me a good deal more forgiving of the worst parts of human nature. As it happens, I wouldn't rate me as a particularly 'successful' lawyer, but I do well enough. But in the end, I really don't GAF that you refuse to believe I'm a lawyer.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:54 AM
1

Oh, sorry! Since you carefully wrote a totally lame insult, I thought that's what we were doing. If you want me to write a lawyer's insult, you'll have to pay.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:51 AM
1

A fuckup? Because I disagree lucidly and vigorously with the idiot views expressed on the thread and I'm not nice and reassuring while I do it. What is wrong with your thinking processes? I'm a troll because I don't fall in the with the group whining?
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:26 AM
2

Gosh, yes; I was so-o-o hurt by intemperate and insulting language being used by some random person on the internet... you can imagine me crying, if it makes you feel better.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:16 AM
-1

This is not a thread about anybody being sentenced unfairly. This is a thread about a woman who has claimed, amongst other things, that she was the victim of abuse by her boyfriend. So comparisons with sentencing disparity between whites and blacks in America are, logically, not relevant. It looks as though she's going to receive a heavy sentence. Your post is interesting, however, in that it tells us the thought process you are going through when you approach the details of the OP, the filter t…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:14 AM
0

No. Lynching is, by definition, a non-legal process in which guilt is assumed and violent people take the law into their own hands. Cosby was tried twice, and the first time he was not found guilty. That's the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:08 AM
1

Neatly encapsulating the moral bankruptcy of this thread.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:05 AM
1

My brother's bigger than your brother.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:04 AM
1

Not really. I'm moderately happy right now.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:04 AM
1

Same as everybody else, we have down time too.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 06:04 AM
-6

Fucking whoosh.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:33 PM
-30

Um, in the same way that Bill Cosby rekt the women who accused him of drugging them so he could rape them, yeah.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:14 PM
-4

What a stunningly stupid comparison.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:13 PM
-2

Good grief. With an imagination like that, you should write books. For children, obviously, since the complexities of adult life seem beyond you.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:12 PM
-2

It takes a lot of practice, believe me, and quite a lot of chutzpah. I mean, here we are, in a thread where a bunch of thinking-impaired scared males are whingeing about how hard done by they are by nasty women. I'm a lawyer, and I've been involved in a lot of cases and trials. You pretty soon come to realise that mostly, people are doing what they can to get by. The number of actual sociopaths who just kill because it's the easy way to steer their life in the direction they want is very small. …
/r/MensRights04/07/18 11:06 PM
-57

Wow, you lot really are sorry for yourselves, aren't you?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:32 PM
-9

Aww, you're too kind.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:22 PM
-17

it's obviously not a crime if a woman is the perpetrator I don't think that's obvious to anyone.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:22 PM
-32

Crocodile tears didn't help Oscar Pistorius.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 07:16 PM
-20

Wow. If you only you'd been there to help the lawmakers in various countries so that they need never have developed these over-complicated systems for determining whether people are guilty or not.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 07:15 PM
3

You have absolutely no idea whether she was telling the truth or not. Neither do I, but I'm not gloating about what happened to her. And it's 'their', BTW.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 07:14 PM
1

Yawn.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:52 PM
-1

First, two wrongs don't make a right. Second, sexual harassment requires intent, like most crimes. There was no intent here, and there wasn't any sexuality either. I have no idea what made your soul as twisted as it seems to be, but you should do something about it and go in another direction if you can.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 05:30 AM
0

What? If a male TV personality stole a smack on the lips in the context of a light entertainment TV programme? I wouldn't call it anything.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 09:37 PM
0

"Sexual harasser Katy Perry" Ohh, get a fucking life.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:14 PM
-8

Nobody is 'in' their grave. All that is in graves is dead tissue.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 10:32 PM
1

Something's hinky here. When I replied to your comment, all I saw was the first two lines. Never saw anything after did"
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/18 11:12 PM
1

By 'edit', you dumbkopf, I'm merely referring to the decision as to, as it where, what is the first frame.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/18 07:53 PM
1

Where did you see me do that? I merely said I'm suspicious because it started immediately before the pepper spraying. I remain suspicious, because nothing has been said to allay those suspicions. I'm quite prepared to learn that nothing significant happened beforehand; but at the moment, there's nothing either way. I believe I expressly said that before - that there's a lack of evidence, which makes me suspicious. That's almost the exact opposite of saying it has to be manipulated.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/18 07:21 PM
1

It does. The term is 'neutral'.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/18 07:03 PM
2

Pretty much.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 07:36 AM
0

That's such an obviously dumb statement to make Imma charitably conclude that you are trolling.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 06:44 AM
1

I'm curious to know which logical fallacies you think I'm spewing. I'm wondering whether you know that 'logical fallacy' has a specific meaning. Which ones did you think I'd committed. (Here's a list just so that you can refresh your memory.) You seem to be slightly obsessed with calling me a child, or making similar verbal sallies. Just FYI: it makes you seem silly. It's crystal clear that you feel very threatened by my posts - which is also silly, I can't hurt you - so that's more likely the r…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 06:42 AM
1

Could be, but I find that hard to believe.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 06:36 AM
1

We aren't discussing other events and what might or might not happen there. We're discussing this video clip. I haven't said 'what about' anything or anybody else, so that part of your post makes no sense. I'm not sure you know what obfuscating means, but congratulations! It doesn't have any relevance to my posts, however, I've had one thing to say and that's all: it's notable that the clip begins exactly when the pepper spray happens and I'm wondering what preceded it. I'm sorry if that's confu…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 12:04 AM
-2

OK, thanks. I'll have another listen. But not now. It's bedtime for me.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:51 PM
0

Since neither of us has seen any of the seconds or minutes that preceded the start of the video, your post is just futile speculation. And, of course, prejudice.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:50 PM
-7

Honour means... doing what you think is the right thing even though it hurts you and possibly those you care for. It's an outdated concept. Decency is much more useful now.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:49 PM
-7

I don't think that's accurate.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:48 PM
-2

It's well known that Antifa escalates any attempt of free speech that opposes their views with violence. Oh that's well known, is it? Sort of like it's well known that Trump is going to drain the swamp inside the Beltway?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:46 PM
-1

I didn't get that. Where did you get that impression? Like, what time code?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:45 PM
-1

Incorrect. Many decent people don't want to find their faces posted on the internet and threatened with death by internet arseholes.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:45 PM
-3

No, it isn't. Honour is a concept associated with warriors and gentry.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:43 PM
-2

Oh, you're a thug. I hadn't spotted that before. And so eloquent too.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:15 PM
-20

I have a bum knee and a bum pelvis and a bum ankle. 5 people don't scare me, I walk away. Everyone in this video (paradoxically, other than the ones in black with masks) is there for the confrontation. If they weren't there, there would have been no pepper spray. If this isn't obvious, then I don't know what to say. If you don't like antifascist demonstrations, turn the TV to a different channel, and have your own demonstration the next week. If the antifascists turn up to your demonstration, as…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:10 PM
-19

If I had to guess, I'd say there was something menacing or threatening immediately before. OK, you didn't edit the clip. But whoever put it on Twitter did. And it was your choice to describe it as being "for no reason", when - since we haven't seen the build up - you can't know that.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:05 PM
-17

Are you talking about some other RL event, or are you extrapolating fictitiously from the clip? People in masks aren't scary. 6' tall 250lb guys are scary when you're small, that's what's scary.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:03 PM
-5

Shooting is only justifiable if it's the only option, or if time constraints are such that weighing up the options is impossible. If there was a likelihood of chasing, then that's different. The whole possibility space opens into new channels, because if someone won't let you walk away then your options are reduced. I know there was chasing early on in the clip, and that's an issue that has to be taken into account. But mostly, this looked like what my dad calls a handbag fight.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:00 PM
-7

Are you disabled? Or do you have legs? If you have legs, walk away. That's the way to deal with a scuffle like this, not gunfire. Fucking sheesh, man.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 07:50 PM
-26

Why weren't we shown the build-up to the pepper spray? Whatever else you think, you must admit that's suspicious. What is OP trying to hide? A reason for the pepper spray, instead of the "no reason" of his title?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 07:48 PM
-13

The title of this sub is 'pussy pass denied'. a life threatening attack LOL. Seems like you're the pussy. Life threatening?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 07:46 PM
-14

Sigh. They aren't wearing combat gear; they are masked and they're wearing no more than what a rollerblader might wear to protect against falls, and for the same reason. I want to know why the footage begins immediately before the spraying, but continues for minutes afterwards. Did OP not want us to see what caused the woman to use pepper spray? I mean, it clearly wasn't "for no reason"; it might have been a bad reason, an insufficient reason, or it might have been a sensible response. We don't …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 07:45 PM
-9

I said they were lucky and it would have been justifiable. Yes, but that's lunacy. A scuffle in the street isn't the place to draw handgun.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 07:43 PM
-11

honor WTF? Are you 12? This concept doesn't belong in such a discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 07:42 PM
-1

If that's what you want - step up and get to it.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:16 PM
-2

liar liar pants on fire.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:29 PM
1

Let's ask them, shall we? "Is calling black people 'subhumans', racist?"
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 05:52 PM
3

"Wow, that is a super dumb, racist comment." — the rest of the world. (It was a troll, right?)
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 06:49 AM
3

"We got you on video, officer." 'Thanks, that's gonna come in useful.'
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 06:48 AM
1

"This is America man, let them go, the cops don't care" Turns out the cops do care. Also, that's not what 'hostage' means.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 06:46 AM
1

Nevertheless, a light lob which probably hardly registered on the boy sees him retaliate with a nasty throw hard enough to smash the apple on the girl's face. Anybody who thinks this clip deserves to be on /r/PussPassDenied should be ashamed.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/17 07:59 AM
1

Oh well, I see you've quickly adopted the new advice from the APA that you can now diagnose people with a mental illness even you've never examined him or her. Is 'crazy eyes' a formal symptom, BTW?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/17 08:39 AM
0

Saw a woman on Friday with a t-shirt: 'Being a princess is such hard work!' Thought: Yeah, Donald Trump found that out over the last few months.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 09:55 AM
2

One of the very earliest terrorist groups was partly named after a woman - Ulrike Meinhof.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 05:18 PM
41

I note that most commenters are confident that they can know what really happened in circumstances such as these from a judgment in the Indian criminal court. I have no such confidence.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/17 08:50 AM
1

*shtupd She intended to write shtupd
/r/MensRights11/02/17 09:13 AM
1

Yawn.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:03 PM
1

The standard of invective is getting really low around here. My boss' toddler grandson can do better than that.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:00 PM
1

There is no such thing as 'reddit', in that sense. It's millions of people. At any given time they don't all agree on anything. But apart from that, it was a non-sequitur. You could have made it not a non-sequitur, but you didn't.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:40 PM
0

I'm not going to copypasta the sequence of posts. Either you didn't read them, or you read them and didn't understand. Either way: your problem.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:56 PM
1

And this week's Non-sequitur Award goes to....
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:54 PM
0

I do enjoy an intelligent debate, don't you?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:52 PM
1

...opinion is objectively wrong LOL. OK.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:51 PM
1

Nice to know you were agreeing with me. I've read your post again, though, and I still can't grok it.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 07:47 AM
0

Oo, asinine. $10 word right there. This is a public forum. People post opinions. Sometimes, a post gets to /r/all, where it comes to the attention of people like me, who use reddit as a quick'n'dirty news feed. What I do is to look at what's being said and if I see stuff I disagree with, I may go into the thread and post. There are, of course, snowflakes who want to keep their sub to themselves so they can wank each other off about how clever they all are, and how they have spotted a major flaw …
/r/MensRights02/02/17 07:46 AM
-4

I'm feeling fine. Don't need to do anything to feel better. Except, maybe, stop arguing with you monomaniacal obsessives. But at the moment, it's still fun. Let me know if you start having blood pressure problems.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:21 AM
2

No. I presumed it.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:19 AM
1

I simply don't follow that. What who propose? Did you actually read the posts?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:18 AM
0

No, it doesn't. It all depends.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:18 AM
0

No-o, what you mean is you don't like the analogy, because it shows up the foolishness.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:17 AM
0

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:16 AM
-1

I am? Wow, how could I do that? That would be... ... o wait. I'm not doing that at all.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:16 AM
1

What's society bias got to do with anything? Are you suggesting... ... no, I've no idea what you're suggesting.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:59 PM
1

OK.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:56 PM
0

Thanks. I hope your dick rots off. There, that's made us feel better, hasn't it?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:56 PM
1

It's a public forum, isn't it? Or perhaps it's a gathering of snowflakes?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:55 PM
-16

Maybe we should put shoplifters in jail for the rest of their lives just in case they steal another loaf of bread?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:54 PM
-1

Could be. But that's not what I said, is it?
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:53 PM
0

False accusation? No, of course not.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:53 PM
0

Malicious false accusations should be punished by the maximum prison sentence for the accused's crime That's completely ridiculous, and fortunately the people in charge of sentencing guidelines have got a much better grasp of reality.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:17 PM
-2

There's a lot of things sentencing tries to accomplish. But of course, that's only judges, lawyers and lawmakers who've been at it for a couple of centuries. I'm sure you could do better after a couple of minutes with keyboard and Carlsberg.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:16 PM
4

Animals? Executing people for harming animals is bizarre.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:11 PM
-2

See my answer to the other guy.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:10 PM
0

What tipped me off was that she's been doing this for some time. Seems like obsessive behaviour.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:10 PM
-27

Nobody cares what you think about what her sentence should have been. That's the point of my post.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:09 PM
1

Didn't understand that.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:07 PM
-8

Because none of that is remotely as bad as sexually assaulting children, that's why.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 07:07 PM
-11

She should be held to the same punishment as the victim would have been if he committed a crime. That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:44 PM
6

She's ill.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:44 PM
1

Thank you for your opinion. Official sentencing guidelines suggest otherwise. If redditors and internet commentators were in charge of sentencing, it would be several months prison for the most trivial offences, life sentence for being mean to your neighbours, death sentence for any offence which leads to serious injury or death no matter what the circumstances. Thank goodness other people are in charge.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:43 PM
-2

There are a lot of criminal repercussions for this woman. But, like many people - and especially red-top journalists - you assume that if it's not prison, it's nothing.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:41 PM
49

That's not mitigation in English law. She has to pay compensation whatever. Newspaper reports typically don't give details on aggravation and mitigation - it's like it's too hard for the journalists to understand. She may have pleaded guilty early, she may have (probably has, by the sound of it) been suffering from mental illness of some sort....
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:40 PM
1

News Quiz on BBC Radio 4 last night: Piers Morgan should just be stuck on a fridge door because he is such a CHORE.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:06 PM
58

I wouldn't be 'with you', Piers, if you suggested a trip to the shops to buy a case of my favourite wine.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:05 PM
21

She lied in her testimony; this does not repeat not automatically mean that the allegation was false. She maintains that he raped her, but recants her previous testimony about never having been subject to sexual activity before. At the age of 13 when the allegation was made/the trial was held she had been being abused by her stepfather for years, which means that a) she was a child at the time and b) she was hardly responsible for her actions from any reasonable view. As a consequence of the for…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:51 AM
1

liable...for court fees from Kleiner Perkins... English, dude, do you speak it?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 09:52 PM
1

Isn't that fucking typical. Instead of producing something that's clear (even if it isn't clear that it is needed at all) there is a deliberate or merely clueless attempt to hijack a textual technique that has been used for at least decades if not centuries to signify something else altogether. FFS.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 08:20 AM
1

/r/titlegore OP apparently has no clue about the difference between opinion pieces and editorials.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 07:01 AM
1

Sore about it are you? No, just bored with tedious posters.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/16 12:28 PM
0

1 - the UK got it wrong You're an idiot. Or a troll.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/16 07:09 AM
1

You seem to have missed my point. Is a 17 year old insufficiently mentally mature in the US, but sufficiently mentally mature in the UK? Or is it merely the reflection of a social difference of opinion in where the relatively arbitrary age limit is drawn?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/08/16 06:58 AM
1

Never found anyone with whom I disagree about everything.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 04:41 PM
-1

Nah-uh. Only if you were speaking with a girl who speaks English as a second language.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 02:08 PM
5

No, they aren't. Where I live, 16 is the age of consent. A 25 year old having sex with a 4 year old isn't sad, it's despicable, and vicious.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 02:07 PM
4

Paedophilia is a medical term. It has no legal significance. Looking up a handful of simplistic/simplified definitions doesn't change the fact that paedophile is not the correct term for someone who has sex with someone else while one is older and the other younger than the legal cut-off age. Most people see a huge difference between a 25 year old person having an affair with a 17 year old person, and a 25 year old sexually abusing a four year old. Don't you?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 12:32 PM
2

Impressive. Sorta. But still wrong. Look up ephebophile, if you like.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 12:21 PM
6

Your world view isn't terrifically relevant, I'm sorry to say. Paedophile has a technical meaning, for all that it is one of the words slung about by the media to incense the audience. It doesn't mean 'having sex with 16 year olds', still less does it mean 'having sex with anyone under the legal age of consent'.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 11:39 AM
5

Of course. My point is that the line is socially determined - in Japan it's one age, and in the US, another. Being on the wrong side of the line is not, without more, a sign of sexual perversion.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 10:30 AM
7

That's because newspapers and TV companies are less interested in accuracy than they are in sales. Paedophiles are interested in children. Someone who fucks 16 year olds is 'merely' breaking the law. You can find 20 year olds who look and/or who behave like 14 year olds, and you can find 14 year olds who look and/or who behave 20 year olds. There's an artificial but legally significant barrier which means that for some particular person, fucking them on one day is a crime but waiting until after…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 09:27 AM
9

“You’re extremely attractive to me!!!” Wow. That's how a bad AI would phrase it.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/16 09:19 AM
-2

Somebody's failure to act in the legally-approved manner after killing their spouse is hardly evidence of the circumstances of the killing, in fact, absolutely not. What on earth was the judge waffling about?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 09:12 AM
2

People are punished for the crimes they commit, for the mistakes they made. Not according to some tariff of consequence.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:05 AM
1

I made no assumption about your motives - what are you talking about? The mere fact that many convictions are overturned on appeal means that it's possible for jury trials to wrongly convict. The assertion that I am objecting to is that this must always be a consequence of deliberate wrongdoing.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 12:39 AM
1

You see, this is the sort of misunderstanding that I'm trying to warn of. Someone robs a shop; the police have a suspect - wearing similar clothing, found in the vicinity, has a previous conviction - and he is (wrongly but perfectly honestly) identified by the shopkeeper. He has no alibi. The prosecutor notes the evidence against him, and decides that the matter must go before a jury. The jury notes the evidence against him, and the lack of evidence for him, and convicts him. Who did anything fa…
/r/MensRights03/01/16 12:35 AM
1

What, you think it's not possible for evidence to be misleading, resulting in the wrong person being convicted without wrongdoing by police and prosecution?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:23 PM
5

I haven't seen the background details, but everyone should be aware that not all incorrect guilty verdicts are someone's fault. Sometimes, everything looks exactly like someone is guilty, everyone does their job correctly, but then later someone confesses or exonerating evidence turns up.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:14 PM
11

There isn't always an accuser. Most of the time, it's just the state.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:12 PM
6

I only see one sentence. What am I comparing it with?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:23 PM
1

That's another way of looking at it, yes. Perhaps she should have just been shot?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/15 06:57 AM
-1

Hard not to think that there were better ways. If I was the teacher I'd rather take the whole class somewhere else and leave the silly cow to feel stupid sitting on her own.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/15 07:55 PM
0

You sound like a waste of life. You sound like an unpleasant fuck wit. And you've totally missed the point of the discussion. Buh-bye.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:05 AM
-1

No it doesn't. Sheesh. If they live in the lap of luxury, rotating between mansions in California, Italy and Thailand, with butlers and maids in every place, private planes to fly them around... $2,000 a month 'discretionary spending' is not going to cut it in the divorce.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:14 PM
3

Justin Bieber's penis has held a mirror Wow. I heard there was a big fuss about the pictures but I'd no idea his dick was prehensile. Respect.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:22 AM
1

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:01 AM
4

And speech is deemed illegal. Wow. I'm breaking the law every day! Who knew? Hate speech is all that is illegal.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 10:23 PM
1

While I think this woman's behaviour is extremely reprehensible, the fact that it may be criminalised is a very sad thing.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 10:09 PM
2

It was when the internet suddenly became awash with phone camera footage of policeman doing things like emptying a gun into an unarmed person running away and then moving a taser to make it look like self defence. That sort of thing. And learning that there are more fatal OI shootings every year in the USA than there are murders in the UK.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/15 07:43 PM
1

Jesus. Thank you for demonstrating the oratorical problem of 'begging the question'.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/15 07:39 PM
-2

On this thread: a lot of people with apparently no critical thinking skills. The police said one thing; the accused gave a different story. It's not really right to take either version as indubitably correct. In theory, the jury sees the evidence and gets by far the best opportunity to judge the evidence, and makes the best decision. In practice, juries are far, far too ready to accept the evidence of police officers who, as we are finding out at an expanding rate, are quite happy to lie their f…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/15 07:04 AM
2

You know, it's weird, but I have discovered that I have great difficulty in swallowing what US police officers say about highly volatile incidents like this. If the only evidence that she was a willing participant comes from police officers' evidence as to what she supposedly said or did, and I'm on a jury, I will simply conclude that there is no good evidence of the nature of her participation. I was going to offer a prize for the first person to guess why I have recently developed this sceptic…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/15 06:59 AM
1

Her conclusion is not based on the premises. The problem was clearly bad management, not some hypothetical distinction between the characters and attitudes of men and women at work.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:56 PM
3

The age of consent is a cultural artifact. It's 18 in some countries, 13 in others. In most countries it's older than it used to be. The people in countries at 18 can argue that the people in the countries at 13 are wrong, but that's the age those countries have decided upon. No-one anywhere believes that sex with an 8 year old is OK. An 8 year old hasn't even started puberty (except those with very rare disorders, like the girl who gave birth at 6).
/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:12 PM
1

If she can do 25 men in a single night, she has a lucrative bloody career in porn ahead of her. Oh, except - only if she has the looks.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:05 PM
1

Well alrighty then.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 06:09 PM
1

True. Do you have a point relevant to this sub-thread, about whether the media improperly distinguished between 'children' and 'boys' when reporting the incident?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 06:24 PM
-1

Hitler? What are you, 11?
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:04 AM
0

Well, I haven't seen anything authoritative about who committed the acts, but it does seem that at least one boy was violated in front of his mother at Abu Ghraib.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:16 AM
-3

I'm sorry, what's the relevance of that to the point you're making? What is the point you're making?
/r/MensRights16/12/14 11:46 PM
1

Depends who kidnaps them. If they're kidnapped by the US Army, they might be sodomised.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 11:44 PM
-28

Because they'd been kidnapped, dumkopf, not killed, and what happens to kidnapped girls? They bloody get raped. Are you not paying attention?
/r/MensRights16/12/14 08:50 PM
20

It's very simple. Pay attention. Because the fact that they are children is hugely more relevant than the fact that they are male.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 07:29 PM
1

Why would you be nasty to me? Let alone 'my ilk'? Because I disagree with you? Or have you grown up thinking it's necessary to be nasty to make your point? Or are you nasty about women whose motives you - on very little evidence, really - dislike? Or just nasty about women generally? What fucking twisted history caused you to think that marriage is about nothing more than 'pussy' on the one hand and 'money' on the other? How old are you? Have you been married? Divorced? Have you ever cheated on …
/r/MensRights16/12/14 07:23 AM
1

No; it's the 'let's see if I can help someone to understand their own shortcomings' gambit. So, it hasn't worked yet, so let's try this: nastiness may emerge from what someone says, or it may emerge from the way they say it.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 07:08 AM
1

Read his post again. You don't see a total disjuncture between the situation these people were in and his language? You're giving yourself away.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:58 PM
1

If you cannot see what's wrong with his post... ...then you too suffer from the same misogynism that he displays.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:25 PM
-7

You too are a nasty person. Are you a grown up?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:43 AM
-2

What a nasty person you are.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:43 AM
1

And not only that, the lawyers could do no such thing. Only a judge could make such an order.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:42 AM
1

I see you have discovered that the divorce was at her instigation, and not his. Where did you learn that?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:40 AM
3

The Bar Council has the power to discipline barristers in many ways, including suspending or removing their right to practice at the Bar.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:39 AM
3

It's nothing to do with common law. The Children Act and the Matrimonial Causes Act are the two relevant pieces of law under which this dispute will be resolved. Plus, as said below, this is only an appeal from an unsuccessful appeal. Whether the Supreme Court will find for or against her is still unresolved.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:38 AM
-19

There's a picture of you next to 'glib' in the dictionary. Probably 'sexist' as well.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:36 AM
10

The american justice system is not fit for purpose.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:02 PM
2

not considered the police producing child pornography Answer: intent. However, it's an example of the loss of perspective with regard to sexual involvement of underage people. 17 years 11 months and 28 days old... CHILD MOLESTER! PERVERT! SIGN THE SEX OFFENDERS REGISTER FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE! 18 years and 1 day old.... Dude! (fist bump). It's fucking ridiculous. The focus should be on old men (and women) interfering with children, not teenagers being teenagers.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 10:39 PM
1

Well, it sounds like 'the island' where you are is one to be avoided. Healthcare personnel have no integrity and neither does law enforcement. Which island is it?
/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter