TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fakeaway42 Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by fakeaway42 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

While it might be two letters longer, and mean the same thing as the word regardless, it's still not an invalid word in that context. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless
/r/MensRights03/01/17 04:22 AM
2

I agree for the most part. However, the current system is extremely biased towards women in these affairs. There's a link below that has some fact points that are relevant. A few such are that A) men pay 97% of alimony, B) men lose custody in 84% of divorces, C) at least 10% of fathers are victims of paternity fraud, D) one third of all fathers have lost custody of children, most of whom are expected to pay for it. The entire system is essentially against what you're suggesting. The system, as i…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 12:05 AM
3

You would think so, but in almost every case where something like this has happened, even when the man has been raped (under 18) and the woman was put in jail, the man still is required to pay child support. Imagine if a woman was required to pay child support to her rapist? There are more cases of this than you think. In cases where the woman takes the condom after use, the judge rules it as a "gift", and that he's liable for child support. Even in cases where the woman's roommate takes the con…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:23 PM
2

So, we're back to the argument of, if you didn't want the baby, you shouldn't have had sex? I've seen people holding signs with effectively that message outside of planned parenthood centers. Women do intentionally deceive partners regularly (up to 30% of child support cases are fraudulent according to one study http://www.wnd.com/2006/02/34861/ ), and I would be willing to bet money a large portion of birth control failures are intentional. How is a man supposed to protect himself? Keep it in h…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 07:42 PM
3

That's the thing, that requires the man to be able to trust the woman who uses those methods. Women chose to stop, or forget all the time. There's a reason the pill is 99% effective in labs, but 91% effective in actual use. Women forget (as well as other preexisting medical issues). One in ten women using the pill get pregnant each year. Even if we ignore that, women will chose to stop using birth control without telling their partner. I don't remember where I read it, but someone discussing the…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 07:09 PM
4

Considering a woman can rape you, fraudulently get access to frozen sperm, or steal sources of sperm (e.g. recently used condoms, and other less sanitary areas) to impregnate herself without sex, it's safe to say that abstinence doesn't work.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:30 PM
6

If you're going to make this kind of claim, you should probably cite sources. The mainstream of this movement doesn't feel that way, a small group of it might. That's like saying mainstream republicans hate anime, just because Trump hates anime. (facetious example) The argument against N.O.W. is accurate because it's actually the largest mainstream organization of that group, whereas the mens rights movement has little to no organization, especially since any attempts to get gender parity (e.g. …
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:27 PM
2

So the man's only options are to A) not have sex, B) use a condom, C) surgically remove the possibility for the man to have children in the future, or D) trust the woman to not lie or mess up with birth control? Also, A sounds a lot like what christian fundamentalists tell women getting abortions, so why is it wrong to tell one gender to just not have sex, while it's not wrong to tell the other gender the same thing?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:20 PM
8

Just arguing your first line, a woman can do many things to get a child from someone. From sabotaging condoms, to lying about birth control, to taking the condom after the fact and inserting the contents, to literal rape. Even if the woman did not physically have sex with the woman (e.g., woman breaks into apartment of couple and steals used condom) or fraudulently gaining access to cryo sperm and artificially inseminating herself. In all those cases above, the man would be responsible for child…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:16 PM
6

Legally, it is a sexist law due to it's implementation. It almost never gets applied to men, even in cases when the woman does make more than the man. It does happen, and in those cases the women regularly goes on talk shows or news articles to complain about it, meanwhile men currently pay 97% of alimony http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703399204574505700448957522 Irregardless of that, the point of alimony was to benefit individuals who could not get a job, and since the women's righ…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:09 PM
8

Then you should probably bring that up with N.O.W., because they don't agree with you. If the largest feminist organization fights against those type of laws however, it's a telling sign that, at least the majority members of that organization, do not politically align with those views, and therefore are not in fact interested in equality. They did that because it benefits women, and feminisim has yet to fight against a law that benefited women at the cost of a man's right, at least that I'm awa…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 05:39 PM
43

"CAN BE", "RARELY", you should probably look up the actual statistics. According to one quick google search, as many as 30% of individuals paying child support are not the biological fathers, and in many cases, even after being proven not to be the father, the individual is still forced to pay child support. http://www.wnd.com/2006/02/34861/ Also, while we're criticizing feminisim, correct me if I'm wrong, but alimony is a sexist law made in a time when women couldn't work. So why did N.O.W. (la…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:09 AM
45

So, when women don't want to have kids, they're told they should just use contraceptives that have millions of dollars of research behind them, and probably hundreds of choices, and even if that doesn't work out, or she choses not to use those, she can still just destroy the kid. Yet in 2016 / 17, when a man wants to have sex but not have a kid, your only argument and option is "well men just shouldn't have sex if they don't want kids". Sure, there are condoms, but there are too many cases of th…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:03 AM
2

It's pretty easy to think women can get away with terrorism when, in almost all of these cases, the individuals were not even remotely punished. If men did any of these about feminist organizations they'd be in jail immediately.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:19 PM
0

Pretty sure shooting a police officer, even in self defense, even during a no knock raid without a warrant, and / or even when the officer is clearly committing a felony, is a serious offence that will get you the death penalty in most states that support that.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:16 PM
555

How can you be this self unaware...
/r/MensRights04/12/16 05:53 PM
2

Speaking of feminist censorship. http://i.imgur.com/Dt0GBWW.png
/r/MensRights04/12/16 05:32 PM
4

Don't forget, it's not rape without vaginal penetration via penis. So I have to wonder how these women are raping each-other.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 04:46 AM
7

They're obsessed with snarkesion, and wrote a similar gamer shaming article / portion of an article around the time of release, and censored anyone who had a differing opinion. Granted they edited the article after the backlash, but that doesn't excuse that. In addition, their site's shit in general. Last time I was there (2013?2014?) it was all for mobile because apparently it's too hard to figure out responsive js, so anyone who uses a large screen has to view it in a crappy format.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter