fakeyfakeythrowaway Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Surprisingly sound thinking from college students Strawman (from Merriam-Webster): a weak or imaginary opposition (as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted That's what you're doing. Y'all set up an exremist definition of feminism and claim that's what feminism is because it's so ridiculous and extremist as to seem unconscionable and easily refuted. That this sub seems to have redefined it doesn't mean the rest of the world shares your definition.	/r/MensRights	02/02/13 04:11 PM
1	Surprisingly sound thinking from college students I don't know every acronym out there. Shockingly enough, I use whole words most of the time.	/r/MensRights	02/02/13 02:48 AM
-1	Surprisingly sound thinking from college students I don't hate men. But nice reddiquet.	/r/MensRights	01/02/13 04:59 AM
-9	Surprisingly sound thinking from college students The misogyny in this thread and this sub disgusts me, so I guess we're even. I wasn't on the "MRAs hate feminists, so they must hate women" bandwagon before, but I'm starting to see where they got the idea. As far as I can tell, y'all have redefined "Strawman" to mean the exact opposite of what it actually does.	/r/MensRights	01/02/13 04:31 AM
-7	Surprisingly sound thinking from college students So civil. Can't believe Men's Rights gets a bad rap.	/r/MensRights	01/02/13 04:18 AM
-18	Surprisingly sound thinking from college students Pretty sure you've got your definitions switched, but nice try	/r/MensRights	31/01/13 10:25 PM
-48	Surprisingly sound thinking from college students VAWA? No. Don't know what that means. But I can say strawman.	/r/MensRights	31/01/13 10:08 PM
-50	Surprisingly sound thinking from college students Feminism doesn't advocate male disposability, it advocates the notion that women are equal to men, should have the same rights and responsibilities, and receive equal pay for equal work.	/r/MensRights	31/01/13 09:59 PM
1	Don't fuck a chick who has a drop of alcohol in her system. Cautionary tale Probably not. There are rules on how evidence can be introduced and both sides usually need to know about it, so that the other side can make any relevant objections re its validity.	/r/MensRights	05/01/13 08:10 AM