TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

falsfield Archive

View 4 posts and 68 comments by falsfield on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

She is, and that's part of the problem. You can direct sympathy when you use someone's instagram pictures instead of a mugshot.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:17 AM
2

Noooooo trust me. The Metro is the best way to get around before midnight
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:59 PM
1

Ha! Good thing my rest day is tomorrow
/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:40 PM
7

Dude, there's nothing wrong with this. The post literally said this is a male version of an already existing gimmick.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 08:23 PM
1

P
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:38 PM
1

L
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:38 PM
2

B) E) L) M) N) J) F) G) I) H) N) O) G) C) A)*
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:53 PM
6

Bingo
/r/MensRights13/09/14 09:39 PM
4

benevolent sexism Otherwise known as 'privilege'
/r/MensRights20/05/14 01:43 AM
2

God damn that pissed me off. So glad I've never seen it on FB
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:24 PM
8

She sounds like an undatable bitch anyway
/r/MensRights07/11/13 04:49 PM
1

Tis a shame. Vice is always pretty good with not injecting bias into their stories.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 08:39 PM
8

Hold up: How is exposing yourself in front of families and children part of male sexuality?
/r/MensRights05/10/13 10:52 PM
2

I would definitely contribute towards an anti-circumcision ad or billboard.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:08 PM
3

Is it still tradition to steal that poster? I haven't been in the umd dorms in a while.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:11 PM
12

And being forced to serve in the army. Can't forget such an oppressive privilege like that.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 05:25 PM
8

Because MGM occurs hundreds of times a day in this country under full protection of the law.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:42 PM
4

Why would someone go to Georgetown for cs anyway?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:22 AM
4

I was circumcised without consent.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:22 PM
4

If you want to find this kid, it helps to know what you're looking for.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:00 AM
9

/s?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 05:57 PM
1

How dare you compare men to animals. Rape is always the fault of the rapist. I just think that telling people "Here's what you can do to stay safe when you're drinking" is different from "If you don't follow these instructions and get raped, it's your fault". I'm sure any person would rather not get raped than get raped and be content with the fact that they did nothing wrong. Being in the right doesn't change the fact that they were raped.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:26 PM
1

For good reason; Solanas and Dworkin definitely sully the name of feminism. The only problem is, when people hear you say "I support feminism (and all of it's subsets)", that doesn't implicitly exclude the crazies.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:19 PM
1

Yes, and anyone who says that feminism is a pretty neat thing is also defending Solanas and Dworkin.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:08 PM
2

Not quite sure myself, but it falls victim to the same problem of too many ideas falling under one collective banner. If you want to look at it like a set theory question, lets say S is the set of socialist movements, with elements s1, s2, and s3 being the individual movements. You can say "I'm a proud follower of (s1 U s2). s3 is far too radical for me", but you can't say "I follow S, but disregard s3. They're a crazy lot". Saying you follow S means you follow all the subsets of S, including th…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:58 PM
2

Not to try and argue semantics here, but I feel that that's part of the problem. So many different opinions, ranging from the benign to the radical, fall under the banner of feminism that asking "What is feminism?" often leads to some ambiguity.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:33 PM
4

Unfortunately, mutilation still is a cultural norm. Saying "unmutilated" means that the alternative is "mutilated", which will lead people to ask why mutilation is the cultural norm.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:01 PM
1

How so? What makes it wrong if everyone involved is a willing participant?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:30 PM
2

Basically that there was nothing wrong with the radio show since the women chose to participate, with a score of -3
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:21 AM
1

Am I the only one here who thinks it's a bit inappropriate for people in this thread to try and figure out the motivations of these 3 men? They're dead, so you're never gonna get a conclusive or correct answer.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 04:31 PM
1

Removing tonsils and the like are only done when they become infected, which justifies their removal. Circumcision often occurs without such medical justification. I am glad I don't have my foreskin That's fine, but not everybody else feels the same way. Some people would have appreciated being given a choice about what sorts of permanent surgeries they undergo.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:54 AM
1

They are both wrong for the same reasons. In what ways would you mutilate a child just because you can? Let me be clear, in a free society, it is not the religious ceremony that needs to be justified, but rather the interference with the ceremony that needs to be justified In a free society, actions that violate the autonomy bodily integrity of another individual must be justified.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:43 AM
2

Would you be making the same argument if a particular religion mandated cutting off a child's hand? How many ways can one use religion to justify child abuse?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 07:32 PM
7

Question: Why is the wheel on the left when it's a European car?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:50 PM
8

The black test annihilates 93% of feminist-minded initiatives. There's a reason why that is, you know.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:19 PM
1

aka circumcision, where someone (quite often without medical training) cuts off the foreskin of an unconsenting baby without any sort of anesthesia.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:57 AM
1

Male genital mutilation being protected by law is a big one.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:57 PM
0

She would still have to pay for a lawyer, and court cases has a HUGE time cost. What would she have to gain by falsely accusing (other than child support)? She's not making any money off him being in prison regardless if he actually raped her or not.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:56 PM
5

Exactly. One of the main problems with engaging in a discussion/debate over feminist issues is that neither participant has a concise definition of what the other's ideas are, leading to much confusion.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:50 PM
1

Really? That's kind of fascinating. How/why would a hospital try to sabotage breastfeeding?
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:35 PM
11

Y'all gotta tell me next time something like this is going on! I'm in the DC area with jack shit to do and I would have loved to come out and support.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 11:03 PM
1

Require the father to establish a $50,000 trust fund to care for any out-of-wedlock child, even if adopted. Now just how in the hell do you father an adopted child?
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:27 PM
3

Yes, it is a coincidence. It could have just as easily been called MMG or GMM.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:17 PM
1

What is it, then? Because I can think of no reason why developers would put a particular type of character in a game other then "Because it will get people to buy our game".
/r/MensRights13/05/12 12:08 AM
1

I assure you that they're not creating these characters to appeal to a demographic that makes up at best 5% of the population. You're right. The majority of gamers are males between 18 and 24. As such, most games available will cater to them. What's so bad about that? It's supply and demand.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 11:54 PM
1

Kratos from God of War, for example, is very scantily clad. As are most male fighting game characters.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 11:38 PM
11

Well if scantily clad, sexualized female characters in fighting games are considered misogynist, then scantily clad and sexualized male characters are misandrist.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 03:26 PM
2

As a U of Md student, I'm quite proud that all of the commenters pointed out every thing wrong with this argument.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:51 AM
3

What sort of "positive results" would result from debating someone who is less informed? Although, if the feminist group in OP's picture is as extreme as their leader makes it sound, the "ground troops" would have less of a stake in the group and therefore would be more accepting of new ideas. Debating the leader would force her to either say something stupid in defense of her ideas (such as in the picture), or admit in front of her followers, that she was wrong in saying that.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:19 AM
3

But..but...but men's spaces are a threat to women! /s
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:19 AM
1

It's the women that in turn draw the men to these events For bars/clubs in general, yes. But this is a concert where a very specific artist is playing, and people are going to this concert to see that artist perform. ("artist" and "perform" being used very loosely here)
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:16 AM
2

...But it's a concert. Isn't the whole point to go and enjoy some live music?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:14 AM
1

It's arguably justified in that case, where people have said that the driving factor in attending was to hook up. That same reasoning doesn't really apply to a concert though, where the main reason you're going is to actually see the performer.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:12 AM
1

If they already have enough leeway to charge male customers triple the regular price, then they could exercise the same right to refuse to sell tickets to Stubhub. Actually, scratch that. Many venues will limit how many tickets one person can buy specifically for that reason.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:10 AM
3

Is having accurate information on the child's brith certificate not a good enough justification?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:01 PM
3

Would you also disagree with parents telling their kids to eat their vegetables or do their homework? By your logic, that is just as much of a violation of their rights. If there is a legal framework in place to extract money from the "father" in case of a divorce, then there should also be a legal framework to ensure that the father is correctly identified, no?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 04:20 PM
1

Question: Why does this need to wait until birth? Cells are extracted as a part of pre-natal care in order to see if the fetus has any genetic mutations/disorders, so why can't they also determine right then and there if such and such person is/isn't the father?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:50 AM
5

What's so bad about that? There are a million different things parents can do to their baby without their consent, for better or for worse. How exactly does saying "50% of this baby's genetic makeup does or does not match that of this potential father" violate their rights?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 01:45 AM
4

We probably need to diversify the Secret Service and have more minorities and more women,” she said. I love how she implies that having a vagina or not being white inherently qualifies you to be in the Secret Service.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:25 AM
1

Not necessarily sacrifice your life, but if you are able to help someone, and someone needs help, and you would both be able to escape safely, why wouldn't you help?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:07 PM
2

People who willingly agree to a TOS saying "Such and such data will be publicly available online" are not victims.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 09:12 PM
1

Personally, I wouldn't confront your parents about it. What's done is done and your parents won't be able to change that. I enjoy my relationship with my parents, and I wouldn't want to make them feel terrible and guilty over something they have no control over at this point.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 11:23 PM
3

It's only really about 1 man. No big deal. Agreed! it's pretty entertaining. NOPE NOPE NOPE
/r/MensRights24/12/11 09:45 PM
5

Not having kids and staying out of jail is easy. What specifically do you mean by a "decent" job? Finding/keeping any kind of job is tough these days.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:47 PM
4

If you're gonna have sentencing be based on the physical differences of the parties involved (which I'm not even sure is legal anyway), it should at least be done on a case by case basis. If a female that is "taller, heavier and possesses greater body strength" assaults a male that doesn't have any or all of these qualities, the female will be sentenced as if she isn't the physically superior of the two. Simple assuming that one gender is more capable of committing crime than the other goes in t…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 03:20 PM
27

I made one little post to /r/againstmensrights and they got scared Did they move in with their auntie and uncle in Bel Air?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:23 AM
8

If it's wrong, then that's a pretty good reason for it to be outlawed.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 04:36 AM
2

I wish I could upvote this more than once.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 06:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter