TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

farsightxr20 Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by farsightxr20 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

lying about needing food Perhaps, but there's no proof in the texts that she was lying about that.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/21 04:02 PM
1

If you're "requesting" money under the pretext that you're the one giving money, then yes there's a chance you'd go to jail. They don't even need to accept -- you are attempting fraud, which is also a crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/21 04:01 PM
-42

It's not legal, it's very straight-forward fraud. He deceived her into sending him money; it doesn't matter what CashApp's UI says or shows -- if there was an intent to deceive, it's fraud. That said, no one is going to bother with a lawsuit over $20. CashApp might reverse the transaction, idk though. Edit: LOL stay mad incels, doesn't change the fact you're wrong. Unsubscribing from this community now as you all are fucking sad people.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/02/21 10:47 AM
3

She was the plaintiff.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/20 08:45 AM
8

squadW
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/20 09:49 AM
0

Do you have a source for any of this?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/20 05:23 AM
8

They want to be able to send you notifications and get device information they can't otherwise obtain through a web browser.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/18 12:55 AM
9

/r/iamatotalpieceofshit
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/18 04:27 AM
16

But if OP didn't even indicate they were female, it couldn't be a pussy pass attempt... so this comment is kind of solidifying their point.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/17 07:54 PM
1

This video was shown in the second trial though and she still won. According to the defense, there were a lot of interactions that were not recorded, in which the police convinced her to do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/17 07:37 PM
64

You're thinking of entrapment, and it has a very specific definition that is generally not applicable in situations like this. To claim you were entrapped, you need to convince the judge/jury that you would not have committed the crime were it not for the influence of the undercover officer. Based on this video alone, it's pretty clear that she was committed to killing her husband and the officer did not even need to talk her into it. Even if he had talked her into doing it, it still would not b…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/05/17 07:58 AM
2

You missed the point.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 07:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter