fatfinger357 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
22	What does the ideal man look like?	DISCUSSION	fatfinger357	/r/RedPillWomen	25/04/17 09:39 PM
12	Would you settle for a lesser men?	DISCUSSION	fatfinger357	/r/RedPillWomen	09/09/17 12:07 AM
1	The Lure of Feminism		fatfinger357	/r/RedPillWomen	14/04/17 12:27 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Why no feminism in Japan answered If there was population reduction in the past and I weren't born, I wouldn't be bothered. How could I be? However for many, if you are born, there is a desire to live and taking away life after it is gone is undesirable. However, if you are never born, the desire is never there. Population explosion is a problem. The world is overpopulated. For example, the amount of meat people are eating is causing a huge amount of suffering among animals as they need to be slaughtered more quickly and in grea…	/r/MGTOW	20/07/17 09:16 PM
1	Discussion: Do people have an obligation to become monogamous and breed in order to benefit society? Should they? The smarter a woman is, the fewer children she has. It seems that women these days are too clever for their own good, at least when it comes to making babies. Research emerging from the London School of Economics examining the links between intelligence and maternal urges in women claims that more of the former means less of the latter. Satoshi Kanazawa, the LSE psychologist behind the research, discussed the findings that maternal urges drop by 25% with every extra 15 IQ points in his book The …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/07/17 12:57 PM
2	Discussion: Do people have an obligation to become monogamous and breed in order to benefit society? Should they? European-derived people (whites) and Japanese should have more children, while much of the rest of the world (Chinese, Indians, Middle-Easterners, Sub-Saharan Africans) should have less. China has a fertility rate of 1.56 births per woman. Britian has a fertility rate of 1.83 births per woman. Yet you want Chinese people to have fewer babies and British people to have more?? How would any of this be regulated? There would need to be a world government. The draconian one-child policy where women …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/07/17 12:51 PM
3	Discussion: Do people have an obligation to become monogamous and breed in order to benefit society? Should they? There are more humans on this world than ever before yet the problem hasn't corrected itself in any way. In fact the problem is only getting worse. There is a massive amount of torture, corruption, deforestation, rape, intensive factory farming, and human rights abuses. Ducks have feathers ripped out alive for coats, human victims of drug cartels have their face ripped off while they're alive, billions live in desperate poverty, infants are circumcised, and dogs are tortured by crushing their he…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/07/17 12:44 PM
2	Discussion: Do people have an obligation to become monogamous and breed in order to benefit society? Should they? That's why it's better if there are fewer children born, which is why I am r/childfree by choice. If a child is never born, she never faces the pain of pollution. She is just never born, so she doesn't suffer.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/07/17 12:40 PM
2	Discussion: Do people have an obligation to become monogamous and breed in order to benefit society? Should they? Unfortunately the majority of those people won't be paying my social security in the future This is why it's pointless breeding. Public debt will be paid for by the next generation. Debt is slavery. Any child you have will be taxed to death in order to pay this debt. It is better a child is never born than be born to become a wage slave so that the current generation can live in hedonism. Boycott humanity. Never breed. Antinatalism FTW.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/07/17 12:36 PM
2	Discussion: Do people have an obligation to become monogamous and breed in order to benefit society? Should they? NO. I am a WGTOW, and I am completely against marriage and breeding, and I don't think society benefits at all. There is no question that marriage, monogamy, and breeding hurt you as an individual. These activities are risky and expensive. However, the world is overpopulated. Humans are oppressive and disgusting creatures. There are too many humans. Humans should be boycotted for being so depraved and disgusting. There is so much destruction to the environment, to the animals, to the planet, to …	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/07/17 12:33 PM
0	Feminazis contribute to toxic masculinity you're using the time to maximise savings to own a place quicker or get a better (however you personally define that) property than you otherwise would have done, had you got trapped in the rental market or painted yourself into a corner with a mortgage I disagree with this. I know of many WGTOWs who live with their parents. They earn high incomes and simply invest the money in shares, cryptocurrencies, etc and never bother buying any properties because if they ever want to move out then they ca…	/r/MGTOW	16/07/17 09:08 AM
6	There is no WGTOW because women need men more than men need women Men can jack off to porn. Women want emotional intimacy, protection, financial support, care for their offspring, etc. It depends. Many women can get intimacy from pets and other women. In many countries the police protects women (and men as well). Women can make their own money, and many women do not want children because they are a burden (r/childfree). If women marry, they are putting themselves in a position where they need to appease men. They need to go on Tinder, date them, spend an extra…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/07/17 08:33 AM
11	There is no WGTOW because women need men more than men need women I wouldn't call myself a radical feminist. I see feminists as people who are very political and I don't concern myself too much with politics. Rather I just care about living a great life filled with happiness and tranquility and peace, and WGTOW gives me that. Men love to go on and on about how women need men. That is BS. They wish that we're true. Men cannot fathom the idea of a woman being independent. They like to fantasize that they are special and needed. Sorry to burst your bubble but men…	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/07/17 01:20 PM
3	Why isn’t WGTOW as big as MGTOW? WGTOW is great. When I became WGTOW my life really improves. I am a big believer. There is no point in having a man.	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/07/17 01:17 PM
1	WGTOW(Women Going Their Own Way) is pathetic. I am a proud WGTOW. WGTOW is not a copy. There were many separatist feminists back in the 1970s. WGTOW is a bit different in that it aims to be more practical. WGTOW is a way if living where women don't bother with trying to change the world bit instead just block men from their lives as much as is practical and aim to live life for themselves rather than constantly appease men.	/r/MGTOW	13/07/17 10:38 AM
3	Why is WGTOW not as big as MGTOW? No, I disagree. Women do not benefit from marriage. Women should stay away from men and go r/WGTOW.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/17 10:32 AM
3	Why is WGTOW not as big as MGTOW? I am a WGTOW and I must say it is brilliant. Why bother with men when you can just be single? Too many women out there spend too much time and money trying to appease men. It's time to just let go, block men from your life as much as is practicable, and then just live your life for yourself! I spend a lot of time in the WGTOW subreddit and hope to spread the message about WGTOW to as many women as possible because it is the only solution to all the sexism and misogyny and hate. A WGTOW lifestyle…	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/07/17 10:30 AM
1	I need relationship advice, but my girlfriends are all blue pill If he is negging you, it is likely he is a PUA and is using PUA techniques on you. I personally would walk away.	/r/RedPillWomen	14/04/17 12:31 PM
1	Realized we really can't have it all I'd focus in trying to find a job if I were you. If you get married, that won't guarantee you'll be looked after.	/r/RedPillWomen	14/04/17 12:25 PM