TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fatherofnone Archive

View 1 post and 62 comments by fatherofnone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

fatherofnone/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

So something only has the value of the current state, as opposed to future states? So relating to the main article, drinking offers a greater benefit as it is current over the future development?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:23 PM
0

So your being a human is dependent on your developmental state? What about those with serious mental or physical impairments that interact with development? Are they abortable too? Who decides what's considered "development"? Is it a species specific standard? What about those who are not able to be tested, where do they fit?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:57 PM
0

Can you show me the data that says a baby isn't human at some point in pregnancy?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:30 PM
0

Who are you though to claim that some reasons are more valid than others? Maybe the 18 yo that got an abortion could have raised a kid just fine if she had a few.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:10 PM
3

Not compareable at all I mean, can you tell me what an abortion is then? I think the mothers right stands above the baby's health in almost all cases in law when it comes to abortion. If we can abort kids, why cant we drink with them?
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:10 PM
-1

You just described abortion
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:52 PM
6

Sauce plz
/r/MensRights07/04/15 07:20 PM
0

Forced prostitution?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:30 PM
4

Potential for abusing the system probably
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:14 PM
3

Care to link any empirical evidence showing that it is a good thing?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:59 PM
28

To be honest, this is from a propaganda piece from the period against the pope
/r/MensRights23/06/14 10:22 PM
9

The sad part is that modern day dialogue may go this way, so maybe /s?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 11:04 PM
5

An opportunity to stand around wanking people off a day? What kind of twisted reality are you in? Devils advocate here, but what if they got a minimum wage job at McDonald instead? Then, you have an individual with almost no English skills, little to no academic background, no bankroll to put money down on necessities (House/apartment/car), and few if any members of their family/culture. And that doesn't even cover getting into the United States (Which, for poor single women like this, wouldn't …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:26 PM
1

Someone needs to tell these dumb shits about Mary Magdalene Mary Magdalene isn't actually connected with prostitution in the bible, she is known only as the woman who had demons driven out of her.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:57 PM
1

Angels in this case mean fallen angels, aka demons.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:55 PM
8

The odd part is, I always hear of my female friends mentioning that they love this kind of stuff. Would they be punished for owning this?
/r/MensRights18/11/13 04:33 PM
3

the link to the OP page is 404, prob a fake
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:48 PM
1

just did
/r/MensRights29/04/13 02:53 AM
1

just linked
/r/MensRights29/04/13 02:53 AM
9

There is a good article on /r/bestof that tears this down. Its pretty good too. Edit: Here is the link
/r/MensRights28/04/13 06:05 PM
7

No matter your position on the argument, this is not how adults act.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:53 PM
4

If anything, women religious are being reformed at a much faster rate then men. I know a few ladies that have joined orders in the past few years and they are among the highest quality of people, men or women, that I know.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:43 PM
1

I already gave you an answer. And what would that answer be? You have still to provide this answer.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:16 PM
1

What is the point of questioning everything if you already retroactively dislike any answer For one to dislike an answer, an answer must first be provided. You failed to provide an answer. Questioning for the sake of questioning makes no sense. Rene Descartes would disagree with you. You have to read and comprehend ideas and WHY they come to those conclusions. So you have to ask a question, particularly WHY.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:58 PM
2

That's not an answer, try again troll
/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:27 AM
2

Some things are to be considered and understood And, pray tell, how does one consider and understand something if they can't question it?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:33 AM
9

The act of questioning things that don't need to be questioned Something I shouldn't question huh? (because they are a school of thought, not oppressive institutions) So don't question others thoughts, even if they may effect me? doesn't make you some sort of rogue free speech mogul, it just makes you look like a pedantic weirdo who wants to win a cheap argument for the sake of argument. Or, if I may rephrase, If I question said ideas I will be labeled as someone who is a "pedantic weirdo" or a …
/r/MensRights11/04/13 08:50 PM
11

I'm not using the quote as its origin, I'm using it in a general context. You should be able to question everything, however that doesn't mean do all end all skepticism and chaos. Problems come when you are denied the right to question something.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 08:15 PM
7

While I do believe that this subreddit goes a little extreme, it does bring up some valid points. To express displeasure or disagreement with someone who labels themselves as a feminist (as opposed to someone who just focuses their efforts on improving the lives of women, two different things) automatically makes you a bigot. As a quote goes, "Find out who you are not allowed to question, they are the ones with power."
/r/MensRights11/04/13 07:51 PM
3

3.) Have them bring this up to their lawyer: if the girl was so drunk that she could not have made the appropriate judgement to have sex, then can her testimony of what happened that night really be trusted? This was one of the biggest factors in helping me beat my case. She had no witnesses other than herself, and I had several witnesses who had been in the next room and could hear the sex happening, as well as were there the next morning when she woke up at my house, gave me a hug and a kiss, …
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:06 PM
2

Can someone explain to me what a cis-somthing person is? I have a feeling people are just starting to make up words for an agenda.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:35 PM
1

which, by your argument, means they are not people.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 02:55 PM
1

You equated person hood to getting a social security card, I showed you an example of an individual that doesn't receive one. Thus, by your example, they are not a people.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 10:34 PM
1

You're tying person hood into eligibility for a social security card. Immigrants are not immediately able to receive one.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 09:30 PM
1

so then immigrants aren't people?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:57 PM
1

And instead of talking actual ethical points of view, you respond with a ad hominem
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:27 PM
3

People aren't debating if a fetus is a child or not, they are debating if it is a person. What I'm saying is that you can't separate the word fetus and child as two different organisms in this discussion.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 09:30 PM
1

Depends on your definition of breathing. The lungs work before a child is born, the just mostly move around amniotic fluid before birth.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:11 PM
5

This goes back to the pro-life/pro-choice debate. To argue that a child in the womb isn't a person, but give birth to the child and 10 secs later it is doesn't make sense. Look up how a partial birth abortion is done. Its really not that far from post birth abortion.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:56 PM
1

living breathing conscious human child Playing devils advocate here, but why does this prohibit abortion? I mean, no pro choice person contest that a fetus is a human child in development, but what they contest is that it isn't a person. I would say that a new born baby isn't a person, thus is eligible for abortion.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:54 PM
5

regular abortion isn't murder, why should this be? To argue against this, you have to argue against regular abortion.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:18 PM
7

Post-birth abortions, given current laws, could be a real future possibility.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:42 PM
3

I feel as if this could be directly applied to individuals that are both for and against religion. It's sad that this is the extent of dialogue for many individuals today.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 10:33 PM
1

As was stated to me, you only have 2 rights in this world. The right to die, and the right to pay taxes.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:10 AM
4

Oh silly, men don't get raped! /s
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:41 PM
1

Just a quick tip. In some places, if you had sexual relations with a woman and she thought you were an investment banker, and you turned out not to be, under the letter of the law you have committed rape by deception.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:24 PM
2

I see a lot of post here that say OP should divorce his wife. Does anyone take a second to think about the kids? Society is screwed up because children are used as weapons in custody cases, and thus end up screwing their own relationships over. OP, yes it may suck, yes she may be using this against you, yes you may not want any more kids. But before you make any major action, make sure you focus and recognize that your children will be effected by this no matter what you do.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:26 PM
13

Then Kate yells at him because she can handle herself and she is a big girl. Until she regrets it the next day, in which case she just calls the police. Win-Win for her.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:34 PM
1

I would ask you to think of the Child, and what the pregnancy means to both of you.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 02:51 PM
1

So reading this, it assumes that if one drinks and has sex they then commit date rape. Does this also apply to women? If they get drunk and have sex, do they date rape men?
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:28 PM
2

If your talking about the Christianity, Jesus actually refers to marriage multiple times, as was it referred to through Jewish history.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:18 PM
-3

When it comes to children, I don't like to screw around. If you can't support children, don't have sex. To many kids have been born to families that "practice" birth control, only to have kids and screw up their future.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:23 PM
0

We still don't understand the full effects of a vasectomy, both physically and emotionally, and they toll they can take on a mans life.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:10 AM
2

Even supposing one accepts your premise, this is immaterial to the matter being discussed What I presented was the common feminist interpretation, where men are only able to fill one head with blood at a time. But in the age of modern medicine, there is no reason to abstain from sex for life just because one doesn't wish to procreate. However, I'm looking out for both men and women long term safety. What happens if a male bc pill causes a 50% increase in prostate cancer after 15 years? What if n…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:33 PM
-1

I am. Anyone who has studied human anatomy knows that women have certain times of the month where pregnancy is just about impossible. Using NFP (Natural Family Planning), You can have sex as much as you want with your partner, using no artificial birth control, and its still more effective then using a condom when she is on a fertile day. All you need to do is abstain on her fertile days and bam, bareback all you want and no need to snipped.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:23 PM
-1

Hate to break it to ya, but it takes 2 people to abstain from sex. Man doesn't have sex=woman doesn't have sex.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 09:03 PM
-1

Having sex is the behavior of animal? No, having rampant casual sex is, where the only thing going through your mind is where your next meal is and where your next piece of tail is coming from. I would prefer if both men and women looked upon all men as individuals that have self control and can, if necessary, permanently stay away from sex if needed.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:50 PM
-1

We do live in such a society. However, why should we condemn our bodies because society says we should? Why not stand in solidarity with our brothers and fight against such opposition.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:46 PM
0

Or we could be responsible and control ourselves, thus not acting out like the animals that the majority of feminist paint us as.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:40 PM
-5

My question is, why would we as men voluntarily try to get procedures or pills that take what is a natural and healthy process in our bodies and fuck it up?
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:21 PM
-1

So does that mean gay men are more important then hetero men when it comes to spending time with children? How about fathers who would like time off to be with their biological newborn child? Does it not count since the child is not adopted?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:58 PM
0

My question is, why is it so important that he is gay? Why can't it just be, "Man gets maternity leave in Brazil." After all, what about the support that fathers in hetero relationships should get? Do they just not count since a woman happens to be present?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter