TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fauxmosexual Archive

View 7 posts and 53 comments by fauxmosexual on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

If the argument is over it's because you're not able to explain why we should follow your morality on this subreddit. Do you find any irony at all in accusing someone of "feminist arguing habits" in the same thread as demanding people adopt a politically correct viewpoint in your subreddit?
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 04:27 AM
-1

You still haven't explained how race isn't relevant when these kind of issues are prevalent in mixed race couples, nor why you're entitled to force /r/theredpill to reflect your agenda while mine should be silenced.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 04:00 AM
-1

Why is making one (allegedly "off topic") comment proof of an agenda but dragging us into an argument about it not? It seems you want /r/theredpill to reflect your political views to the point of pretending that black women need even more alphaness than White women.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 03:41 AM
0

You're deluded if you think that op's miscegenation has nothing to do with his former betadom. The racial dynamics of the relationship are very relevant here.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 03:35 AM
1

I respect your right to share an opinion. I don't see why this sub being about the red pill is a reason for me to lose my right to my opinion. Thought policing everyone into an "acceptable" opinion is a hallmark of feminism and betas imo.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 03:20 AM
1

I suppose you'd rather we treated this as a feminist safe space?
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 03:15 AM
9

She ended up in tears after recognizing my intolerance to her lack of respect. It looks like you did the right thing here. This wasn't a shit test, it was her exerting actual dominance over you. From the sounds of this I'd say your wife has become so accustomed to walking all over you she thinks she's the boss. Not only is putting a woman with childlike maturity in charge of your household dangerous for the wellbeing of your whole family, but she won't be happy without you dominating her and tak…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 10:05 PM
1

You've got to embrace it. Rage is alpha. Swallowing it just makes you another beta hamster.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 04:07 AM
2

This sounds like an excuse to not live up to standards of masculinity. I could imagine betas telling each other that while their girlfriends leave them at home to go and ride the cock carosel.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/13 03:01 AM
4

I'm going to be charitable and assume he's suggesting that the only actions worth writing about in the history books were those done by men.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 10:41 AM
8

Pointy elbows, would not bang.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/13 03:55 AM
2

Did you just link displays of peacocking and not see that it's alpha? I think you've swallowed too many blue pills. Why do you get so upset at the suggestion gays are alpha? Do you have sexual security issues to work through? I recommend /r/seduction for help with that, you might learn a little about what it means to be alpha.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 10:23 PM
2

bold claim. where does it come from then? god? Like I said, there's an entire branch of philosophy dedicated to exactly that question which cannot be adequately summarised in a comment. The wiki article I linked you earlier is a good starting point if you're interested. they are not. I would say gay men on the whole take much more pride in their appearance, spend more time in the gym, pay much more attention to grooming and fashion, and are more in touch with their sexuality that hetero men. The…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 09:28 PM
2

Exactly my point. There exists a standard of beauty that isn't explained by biology, which asserts itself more strongly in cultures where most sexual behaviour is not driven by procreation. We judge beauty both through the prism of our innate sense of beauty and through our biological reproductive drive, and as society moves away from the sex = babies paradigm one will wane while the other grows. Hence why we have more gays, and why gay men are generally much more attractive than straight men.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 09:07 PM
-1

So what do you think the biological reason for our appreciation of the beauty of, e.g., Georges Braque's work?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 08:58 PM
0

why are we attracted to "beautiful" things? This is an entire branch of philosophy and I'd be doing a disservice to it by attempting to summarise it in a comment. Note that we have a sense of beauty entirely separate from our mating urge. The male physical form is obviously superior and more capable, and is much more often honed by the alpha to perfection, unlike the weak-willed women. And cavemen were ruled by the reproductive instinct. What I'm saying now is that socially we are aware that is …
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 08:54 PM
0

but if you're in the USA I'm not, so I don't know why your perspective is one of USA = Entire World. That's why I advocate women-only units, which would be deployed in a manner appropriate to their battlefield capability - i.e., in the rear.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 08:49 PM
-1

I'm sorry your homophobia keeps you from appreciating the male figure. It's sad, it's a very beta view of the world to take, and letting feminism ingrain a hatred for men is counter productive. Have you considered using pornography to fix your sexuality?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 08:48 PM
2

I'm not sure what you're having trouble with? Evolutionary psychology is the study of mating pressures on biological development, including the effects of lessened mating pressures.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 11:02 AM
1

It's not selected for via evolution. We have a base standard of beauty, hence why we can appreciate artwork that has no reproductive signalling at all. By that objective sense, the more capable male form is better.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 09:29 AM
4

Perhaps I'm overstating the probability, but it should still be a conclusion OP should at least consider as a possibility. His feelings wouldn't be at all out of place in a coming-out story.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 08:41 AM
2

Humans are attracted to beautiful things. Reproductive urges temper this need by altering our idea of beautiful. We are, at the height of population growth, at the lowest ebb of the need to reproduce. Hence, people tend more towards the base form of beauty than selecting for reproductive reasons. So they tend towards the more beautiful, more powerful, and more alpha form: the male. Less attractive men, less able to obtain sex with the better sex, tend towards the opposite sex, and the opposite i…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 08:33 AM
-2

It's just a biotruth, men are objectively more sexually desirable. That's why gay men are on the whole much more attractive that their hetero counterparts, and lesbians on the whole much less attractive that their hetero counterparts. The natural tendency, unskewed by the reproductive need, is towards men and this shows in the tendency of the more attractive to prefer men, and the less attractive to prefer women. It's also why the rate of homosexuality increases as our culture moves toward sex m…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 07:48 AM
9

You have to be very careful. Often women will groom you towards beta behaviours subtly, a little at a time. Although there is nothing wrong with some beta attributes you have to be very careful. There are many former alphas who are stuck with some serious oneitis with women who don't want their dick anymore because they were pushed beta, one little mindgame at a time. Careful friend, this is how women operate. You give an inch of beta now and she will stretch it into a foot while you're not look…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 06:28 AM
3

The most alpha state isn't heterosexual. Maybe as your confidence and self-awareness increases you're just getting closer to your actual sexuality?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 06:19 AM
1

I hope you're not including me in that we. And isn't the solution to that problem to have women-only military conscript units? I'm sure someone in that vast military-industrial complex of yours can make a lightweight assault rifle in pleasing feminine colours.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 02:03 AM
0

"We" being America? Maybe basing your government on who is fighting is rational for a country that considers warmongering to be a virtue and might actually enact a draft, but it makes no sense anywhere else.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 01:52 AM
0

I don't understand your point. When we vote pro-socialism, it's rich who sacrifice. And when we vote pro-business, it's the poor who sacrifice. Very few government decisions (unless you're in a warmongering country like North Korea or the USA) have anything at all to do with war, so I don't see why that should be the only qualifier.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 01:44 AM
0

I think that would be one way to qualify as someone who contributes, but it shouldn't be the only way. There are better ways to enrich society than through military service, and a society where political decisions were made solely by military people would inevitably lead to a very warlike government.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 01:40 AM
-1

That really is the best option. It's not a coincidence that the most desirable males tend to turn to homosexuality at greater rates.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 12:33 AM
7

It's logical that only people with a direct, vested interest in the wellbeing of the country should be able to vote. People who are earning, employing, paying tax, who own property, etc. Also voting should be restricted to people of able mind: not mentally ill, mature, who are not easily overcome by emotion. These tests should be applied fairly. Those women (and they do exist) who are contributing, logical-thinking members of society should be able to vote. Those men who aren't freethinkers or c…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/13 11:58 PM
-3

One-itis is beta.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/13 11:32 PM
0

Don't ever be ashamed to be alpha. Right now, you're being way too beta. You've been turned off by your failures in the past and look down on "chest-thumping". You need to embrace your masculinity rather than being ashamed that you don't measure up.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/13 11:31 PM
5

I don't think we can ever have equality simply due to the physical and emotional inferiority of women. It's a harsh truth, but we can't force biologically inequal genders into equality no matter how hard we try.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 11:38 PM
5

Are you just cracking open fortune cookies and typing them out now?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:27 AM
-3

That wasn't a comment I made here. It was in /r/lgbt, another safe space /r/mensrights like to invade for having opinions they don't agree with. You're welcome to take this discussion to the linked thread, your moderator Gareth321 has cautioned me in the past to be careful about what I say so I'm not planning on getting into an exhaustive, blow-by-blow about the many failings of your community here.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:09 AM
-1

Being a classy person I don't want to invade your MRA safe space with arguments you may dislike. Feel free to ask me over in the linked thread in /r/evedreddit though.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 10:59 AM
-13

Stay classy, /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:40 AM
-2

You realise he's talking about a corporation in an online internet spaceship game, right?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:39 AM
8

An anti-theist can also be an atheist, there's no conflict there. For example I'm both a MRA and an anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:31 AM
2

That's right, it only works when the words have near identical social contexts. Unless you're claiming that misogyny is some kind of real problem in today's society compared to misandry the word swap between the two is not valid. That swap could only be useful to illustrate the point to those idiots who believe misogyny is a problem and misandry isn't.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 10:46 AM
1

That's my point. The entire statement does change, which is why you can't simply switch a word to check whether the statement is fallacious or not.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 08:55 AM
-10

That's not a universally useful measuring stick. To switch the words around is to ignore the wider social contexts. For example judging the statement 'gingers have no souls' by word-swapping it to 'niggers have no souls' it could make the first statement seem like serious discrimination because it parallels the second statement which is obviously discriminatory. That's not a valid comparison because there is a wider social context to the word nigger that doesn't exist for ginger. The example zyk…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:01 AM
0

*libelous The other thread was less specific and more focused on the comment itself, I'm interested in men's rights but wanted to understand whether /r/mensrights was a community I might like to participate in and this question helped answer that. I thought it was worth a separate thread.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:30 AM
4

I personally don't condone attacking or downvoing /r/feminism, but if you think there's something to be gained for the MRM by arguing on the internet and clicking arrows be my guest.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:29 PM
4

<3 I'll be good.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:35 AM
0

Testicles too.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:42 AM
0

Your cynicism is hurting the Men's Rights Movement. If a man can't even engage in meaningful activism without having his motives questions by his brothers what hope do we have?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:08 AM
1

That's unfair, I love this subreddit and have contributed often: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pfiah/feminist_group_criticises_police_for_victim/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/psxqd/school_gender_achievement_gap_explained_woman/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sfrw4/there_can_be_no_equality_while_this_is_true/
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:10 AM
0

You take internet words far too seriously.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 02:28 AM
0

You sure take internet points seriously. I upvoted you until I saw you cry about your downvotes, and now I'm off to downvote you as much as I can. Moral of the story: don't cry about internet points if you love them.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:01 PM
3

Luckily paragraphs work the same way they do in reddit as they do everywhere else. I might have been too subtle in my sarcastic tl;dr. My intention was to highlight the fact that to prove you don't care you did something which proved that you cared.
/r/seduction17/08/11 03:55 AM
13

I can't believe I read that wall of text. Paragraphs are your friend. proper tl;dr: Socially awkward teen gets shot down by girl. Improves his game, health and life but is very insulted that girl thinks the improvements are all about her. To prove to girl that it has nothing to do with her he sleeps with girls sister.
/r/seduction17/08/11 03:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter