TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fauxshoh Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by fauxshoh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This. I hate seeing victim-championing MRA shit on here like "it's so hard being a man :-(".
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 05:24 AM
6

Hah, so true. I remember when I started doing high school sports and first got into great shape, the way men and women both treated me were like night and day from my lazy days. It's almost disheartening to realize how significantly your appearance impacts how others treat you.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 07:00 PM
3

That's fine, and I wish you luck. That said, I predict in the future when and if that happens, you'll realize there's much more to life than sex. If nothing else, your libido wanes as you age, somewhat forcing you to focus on other things.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 06:56 PM
1

I'll go ahead and say they're not a man. Enough with this post-modern "well that's just like ur opinion there is no objective truth." Smoking dope and playing video games all day is a pathetic, non-masculine existence. That is the type of lifestyle I would wish upon my enemies.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 06:52 PM
20

The terrorist was about to kill me and the other soldier I was carrying to safety, but before he fired his weapon, I yelled out to him "Wait! You CANNOT fire that weapon yet! I need at LEAST 30% more time than you would have allocated to a male enemy combatant." He of course obliged, giving me the time I needed to make sure my squadmate was safe. Thankfully, reality obliges the ridiculous needs of AA and diversity quotas. Oh wait. Affirmative action should be dismantled immediately. It's liberal…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 05:15 PM
0

The link completely refutes what you said. And now your autism is trying hard to deny the fact. Alimony can be owed by non-married couples. Care to refute the case law that article cites? How am I wrong? Maybe next year autismo.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 07:08 PM
0

http://www.divorcenet.com/states/nationwide/palimony Alimony may be owed in California even in unmarried couples. Stop spreading misinformation, bro
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 03:37 AM
4

I believed it to be true, just as I'm sure you believe several 100 things to be true every day without validating with empirical evidence.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/15 12:06 AM
3

Thanks for posting, I had no idea California wouldn't be on there. My family friend is a brilliant tax attorney and had talked about common law marriages before and how he avoided them, so I assumed California had them. Great to know.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 10:06 PM
3

That's technically true, but common (something) laws state that if you cohabitate for a certain period of time, I believe you're treated as a bona fide married couple. That is to say, she may still be entitled to half your shit that you earned while cohabitating, as well as alimony. I'm in the US.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 08:31 PM
7

I don't understand this argument. How would I have a cohesive family/children without being married?
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 08:10 PM
3

I don't think he's equating, just saying you get far more batshit crazy Marxists when you look at Atheists vs Christians.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 02:48 AM
1

That's actually surprising given that women have better fine motor control skills (think handwriting).
/r/TheRedPill03/02/15 04:15 AM
0

I don't think they're sports, and I don't think there are women participating. I was being sarcastic.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:32 PM
1

I'm saying that any report on self confidence will show males have, on average, higher self-confidence than women. It doesn't mean that males don't have issues with self-confidence though.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:30 PM
30

It was sarcasm. It blows my mind yall don't recognize that when clearly so few of the pros are women. I cannot personally think of any that are.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 01:44 PM
12

There are plenty of sports where women can compete with men, they're just non-physical. That's why the top-tier Starcraft and chess players are 50% women. Men may be stronger, but us girls are just as smart! Edit for people with low IQs: /s
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 01:09 PM
11

Depression is a neurological issue stemming primarily from a lack of serotonin. Environmental issues have a complex but somewhat predictable effect on mental health (e.g. When your father dies you'll likely be more sad for a time.) Your backhanded quip that men have higher suicide rates doesn't mean we aren't more confident on average. You've really never heard that test boosts mood and increases confidence? Source discussing depression and low test: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/15669883 An…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 12:14 PM
20

https://i.imgur.com/GfN1nk0.png
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:55 AM
10

True, it was a very savvy business decision, akin to reddit defaulting 2XC, and pinterest's recent concerted efforts to appeal to a male demographic. Unfortunately the latter portion of your post seems more and more true every day.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:53 AM
2

This never even crossed my mind. I can't remember any girl ever being told this, as it would be redundant to say "you throw like a class of people to which you belong!" Funny how they choose to invoke it.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:51 AM
1

While I agree everyone experiences a confidence drop in puberty, let's not be so quick to adopt a victim mentality. At the end of the day, testosterone has profound effects on self-confidence that we should embrace and be thankful for.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 08:48 AM
17

We need to fix the wage gap, and the biological strength gap (but men and women are totes equal in every facet!) How long will feminists try to deny palpable facts, such as male and female dimorphism? Men and women are not the same physically, biologically, or mentally.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 03:20 AM
1

SHE DINDU NUFFIN. Liberals will defend this.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/15 08:56 AM
8

MIKE BROWN WAS JUST PLAYFULLY TOSSING BACON AND THEN THE COPS SHOT HIM 15 TIMES EXECUTION STYLE IN THE BACK WHEN HIS HANDS WERE UP THERE'S NO EVIDENCE OF AN ASSAULT MIKE BROWN DIDN'T EVEN COMMIT STRONG ARM ROBBERY THIRTY MINUTES BEFORE THAT WAS NAZI PROPAGANDA CAUGHT ON TAPE AND TOTALLY NOT RELEVANT TO HIS CHARACTER HE DINDO NUFFIN
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/15 02:02 AM
-2

Would you PM me the statement? I can't seem to find out about this controversy.
/r/seduction20/06/13 07:47 AM
8

So damned suave.
/r/seduction14/05/13 12:25 AM
1

Have a conversation. Where are you from, what do you do, what are you passionate about, observe something interesting in the environment, etc.
/r/seduction11/05/13 11:29 PM
18

(Say this as coy/playfully as possible while smiling:) "No, I just get too nervous talking to girls, it's really quite the issue." Since you're talking to her, she'll know you're fucking around with her. This has always elicited positive results for me.
/r/seduction08/05/13 06:25 PM
6

This is surprisingly not a troll from what I can surmise. Check out the post from the throw-away account.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:10 AM
1

Yes, I'm sure if the players were women, and one of them suffered such a gruesome injury, they'd all rush to her side and not avert their gaze. Lol. Actually guffawed at the thought of this.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:29 PM
18

Your rights end where my feelings begin, shit lord.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:26 PM
-6

I don't like the statute. Calm down and quit putting emotions into this. "Unless you have justifiable cause for not making the payments..." He seemingly did not have justifiable cause. Ergo, he must pay. Do I think it's morally and socially fucked up? Yeah, that's why I'm a part of this subreddit. As a matter of law though, the man is seemingly liable. That's what I was arguing in my original post and in this post.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 01:39 AM
15

Also, Godwin's law.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 07:19 PM
-9

Christ, what a sensationalist response. No, a judges professional and moral obligation in common law courts is to interpret relevant precedent cases and any applicable laws, then apply them to the case at hand. Judicial activism should be employed sparingly. Take issue with the law/precedent cases, not the judge's job description.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 07:18 PM
3

I've read all cases on Judge Judy are paid for by the show. It's a legitimate civil court, but they pay any costs doled out by the judge.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:11 PM
2

They should be. In economics, this is called price discrimination. Those who cost the system more on average are charged more. Higher insurance rates for men is not a men's right issue. You could argue we should find a more accurate metric for assessing potential liability, but as it stands this is the most effective means. If I chain smoke and apply for health insurance, would you want to pay the same rate for health insurance as me to bear to liability I pose? This opinion is unliked, but I st…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:47 AM
3

By offering more money to teachers, you would effectively grow the number of potential candidates you select from, and would thus have better teachers.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:05 AM
6

I think the right to legal representation is only applicable to government courts, not university courts which are seemingly autonomous courts that can dismiss you over their findings. Can any lawyers chime in?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:50 AM
2

The burden of proof lies with those making he claim. How can they be rapists, just by virtue of having been reported as such by a sole source? Someone claiming that they are a pumpkin does not make it so. This assumes that anyone who has claimed to have been raped, has been, which just doesn't hold. Also, it's important to question what qualifies as rape in this measure.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:44 AM
1

There are consistent trends that hold true using these metrics, why would they care about variance on an individual level? They won't, hence the current business model. Trends emerge in the aggregate, they don't care if as an individual you're a competent driver, nor would it be cost-effective for them to determine that.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:27 AM
1

We wouldn't use race or gender as a basis for hiring because we have more appropriate metrics of measuring one's capabilities through past work experience and credentials. It would be unfeasible and an invalid measure to administer a driving test to potential candidates for driving insurance. You don't have any credentials to prove your driving competence other than a history of accidents and tickets. So instead, using gender, race, grades, etc allows them to better discern the risk you pose as …
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:01 AM
-3

Why not? Gender is an effective proxy for how much of a liability one poses while driving, as do grades, and I'm sure many other metrics. I've been driving for 6 years. Never got into any accident, never gotten a ticket. And yet I pay higher rates for being a young male because young males pose a higher risk for insurance. And I don't piss and moan about it. Banks too will charge you a higher interest rate as compensation for posing a high liability. It's not discrimination, it's goddamn economi…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 08:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter