TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fecesious Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by fecesious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I misread, my apology. Being a CEO isn't a trait, so your argument still doesn't make sense to me. It's akin to saying the diversity of men is the reason there aren't as many women in science. The aren't as many women CEOs because it has historically been a role only men hold. It takes an entire career, usually, to make your way to executive positions. Older women who are in executive positions now were up against different odds than younger women today.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 11:25 PM
1

Not everyone can be a lawyer. You have to interpret everyone's words in context. Everyone should be allowed to make their arguments even if they don't have a grasp on the vocabulary. If someone says something that sounds contradictory, you can ask them to clarify.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:18 PM
1

"Sexual Assault" implies a crime less than rape to many people. He's suggesting that because of the ambiguity involved with someone being beyond ability to consent, that that specific scenario might need to be reconsidered as a lesser crime. Revisiting the possible charges seems reasonable especially in cases where both parties are potentially beyond the ability to consent.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:10 PM
3

How do you define consent? That's where the ambiguity is.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:51 PM
1

The word is up for interpretation, like all words. The meaning of the word is the issue that's being discussed. You're begging the question and responding with unreasonable tone. I just wanted to hear a reasonable argument why the physically forced sex is equivalent to non-consensual but not physically or verbally opposed sex.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:37 PM
-1

IQ is hardly an important feature of a CEO. In a lot of cases, rapport and charisma are the defining features. Lack of merit might be the cause, but that's due to historical discrimination of women in the workplace, so that's hardly a fair argument.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:17 PM
9

Right. This could have been poor word choice and nothing else. He didn't even say anything specific to women outside of the single word. Let's not make a big deal about syntax.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:12 PM
-1

I downvoted this because it seems to be nothing but an unrealistic hypothetical scenario. Show me this in the real world.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:08 PM
2

This is true of all belief systems including atheism, religion, politics, etc. People are of varying degrees of rationality. When an irrational person adopts a belief system, they don't always think critically about the system itself and run with oversimplified versions of the ideologies of the system. This feeds back into the irrationality of the people involved, validating their irrational beliefs and driving them further towards more irrational beliefs. It happens here too.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:24 PM
1

The truth is that women's issues are important too. There are still pockets of injustice for women that need to be addressed. Men's rights should not ever become anti-women's rights.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:09 PM
4

Can we make anti-women posts and comments against the rules? I think it's going to take Mod involvement to actually solve that one. I've seen The_Donald leak into a few of them.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:07 PM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:01 PM
3

That doesn't really make any sense, practically speaking. The intention of separating the sexes is to encourage more young women and girls to play sports despite their inherent athletic disadvantage. That's a good thing, especially for kids.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 03:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter