TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

feel-theTang Archive

View 1 posts and 49 comments by feel-theTang on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

feel-theTang/r/MGTOW19/11/17 11:53 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well not always of course, but if she's wearing a fair amount of makeup then it could be boosting her up by up to a few "points" facially IME. If she's wearing the right clothes then her body could easily be looking up to a couple of points better too (even a literal corset - there are things out there that resemble corsets are work similarly but without the high level of discomfort those caused - most of the benefit, much less of the cost - modern woman's motto haha). Those scores are that diff…
/r/MGTOW19/11/17 11:48 PM
1

"Game" is like male social makeup and women do already get pissed off about it. I mean a lot of it comes down to making yourself seem higher social sexual value, analogous to makeup making women look higher physical sexual value. It's about "oh I have lots of good options" so that women in their hive-minded way think "other hot girls like that guy so he must be hot and I should want him". They're too emotional and dumb to realise when it's being used on them, but they hate the "idea of it" and i…
/r/MGTOW16/11/17 05:35 PM
2

Those are literally the only acceptable options for men now. Marriage became a no-go decades ago, then even LTRs became pretty risky and awful. Either short casual things if you really feel the need to (like if you're young and your hormones are bullying you) or monk mode are the only options that make any kind of rational sense. Except prostitution which can be a better alternative to the first option in certain places. Getting financially attached to a woman, or overly emotionally attached, is…
/r/MGTOW16/11/17 05:09 PM
8

It means whatever the person saying it wants it to mean - another one of those empty rhetoric terms like objectification, misogyny and diversity. Of course, those words have objective meaning following the dictionary definitions, but they're used so much to mean different things. Feminism itself is a good example, as a word. It's really Orwellian - people think of the dictionary term they learned, but what's really meant is something quite different, in a way this allows the huge doublethink to …
/r/MGTOW16/11/17 02:52 PM
1

Thanks! Glad you found it good! I've been slipping back into some red pill rage these past few days and decided to go back on a "journey" of analysis to to remind myself the stuff that makes up what we'd call "the red pill". I was letting blue-pill idealism, and more importantly behaviour, slip back in to myself. I might be posting a big report after a while of this - trying to sum up sociology and psychology from a redpilled/mgtow perspective.
/r/MGTOW12/11/17 08:22 PM
6

So much this. Women are hive-minded herd creatures. Men evolved to be able to work alone or in small packs to hunt and fight, while women stayed mostly in larger groups back at the settlement. Women will flip-flop at the drop of a hat if the social conditions change significantly. Now, they're the most likely to be fervent supporters of SJW agendas, but in the USSR they were the most loyal communists, etc. Also why a guy they find unattractive can suddenly become attractive if a few women they c…
/r/MGTOW12/11/17 06:26 PM
7

I think it's not suffering that's important, but earning what you have. It's so easy for women to get good men to commit, that they don't appreciate it much when they do. It's perhaps also why not committing, or making a woman work to get you to, somehow makes you more attractive to her. Far too many good-looking, financially successful, charismatic men who'll instantly commit to any decent-looking woman who spreads her legs for them. Like so many other areas of life, women act entitled and don'…
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 05:45 AM
1

I'm a bit under that height and agree. It probably makes it a bit harder, but I've only noticed it directly cock-block me once (when a girl a bit taller than me implied she'd fuck if she was shorter lol). I know girls say a lot of crap about short men but I think it's mostly posturing on their part. Their actions say different than their speech - as usual. It's probably true that most girls won't fuck guys significantly shorter than them unless there's some other big factors at play, but you'd h…
/r/MGTOW05/11/17 05:50 PM
17

Away from shit like this!
/r/MGTOW05/11/17 04:12 AM
3

Like TFM's "transgender lesbian movement", or the Kekistan stuff, subverting their own bullshit tactics against them.
/r/MGTOW03/11/17 11:13 AM
3

Ah I should have included one haha. TL;DR The vast majority of women are severely lacking in the ability to predict the future and prepare for it. They don't put sufficient (or any) effort into self-improvement and little into situation-improvement in the long term. This is why they go down while men go up, despite them in most cases having many advantages and a better start in life initially. Also why the wall hits them so hard - the wall could be a lot more gentle if they prepared. And for the…
/r/MGTOW02/11/17 05:18 PM
2

Think of the things a woman could achieve if she roughly followed the ideas in the OP. And they're not even hard, it wouldn't be difficult to do those things. But what I think is at the root of this, a deep issue with most women, is that they can't really get the concept of building things up - improving things - over the longer term. Exemplified by how they want a man who already has everything they want, rather than getting a man with lots of potential and helping him grow. Just generally, the…
/r/MGTOW02/11/17 04:24 PM
5

Indeed there are very few semi-popular subs without loads of upvote-seeking repetitive memery under the hot and top sorting. Sorting by new is a good bet to get a wider variety and see the stuff that later gets buried by GIFs with 500 upvotes.
/r/MGTOW26/10/17 01:54 AM
1

So true, they're projecting because they like status and education is one form of status. Annoys me so much how people (especially women) conflate education and intelligence. I'm not saying this out of bitterness or jealousy, I have a stem degree. But because in my experience education doesn't correlate more than weakly with actual real-world intelligence. There's just a lot of status-obsessed snobbiness surrounding education and it's annoying. Learning should be because of interest/passion and/…
/r/MGTOW24/10/17 11:46 AM
3

Yeah, yet so many guys don't like the idea of fwb and want a "proper girlfriend". Men really are the romantic sex, I hope as many men as possible realise that most 'romantic' stuff is just in their heads, for their own sake. A fwb sounds far better than a girlfriend to me, but can be a slippery slope too.
/r/MGTOW24/10/17 09:58 AM
2

In response to the OP about this, I think that's just how many women look. Doesn't mean they understand you or can read you, just they have this cockiness that gives off this look like they can see right through you. I've seen even naive women who don't know shit still give that look a lot. I think some might even "practice" it as a power thing to look confident. They have that same look in their eyes most of the time. Just my personal observations though.
/r/MGTOW23/10/17 11:35 AM
1

Great insightful comment thanks! It comes down to either rule by rationality or passion. If you are ruled by passion your easily enslaved. This applies to politics also imo, big time. Emotional politics has massively taken over all across the so-called "spectrum" of politics. I don't claim to know the answers for sure, but I'd say that individuals have become ruled by feelings, and by extension so has every major component of society. It's all so irrational now, all so easily and commonly manipu…
/r/MGTOW23/10/17 03:08 AM
4

Haha right on! I've always thought, how much of the typical man's stress and problems in life is caused by women and the way he interacts with them? And I've always thought it must surely be the vast majority. That is, after being "rudely awoken" into the state of looking at relationships analytically and objectively, in other words - red pill. But blue pill people see it more like women are the solution to most of a man's internal and many external stresses and problems. They genuinely ascribe …
/r/MGTOW22/10/17 11:18 PM
20

Same, for one reason, the male brain. I wouldn't want to be a women if it meant thinking and feeling like a woman. I wouldn't want to throw away the thing I value most, a rational and able mind, for the benefits that women get. If I could have been born a woman and kept my brain virtually identical then maybe, but such a thing is a biological impossibility - the female hormones would have drastically altered brain development and emotions and personality would be different.
/r/MGTOW21/10/17 12:54 PM
1

Yeah especially the bit about getting tossed aside so often, happens all the time to guys as girls monkey-branch, even while they're still just flirting. And it is confusing and hurtful for guys too, except for the fact we tend to get somewhat used to it after a while and learn not to care. Guys who are somewhat perceptive realise that it's because nearly all at least semi-attractive girls have multiple dudes they flirt with and just quickly roll through the list dropping them for what they thin…
/r/MGTOW18/10/17 11:24 PM
1

I've been thinking about this quite a lot recently as more and more interest appears on here. I agree it's sad for society, and also don't have an interest myself, not until they get incredibly realistic in at least a few decades time anyway (without the bitchiness of course - that's too much realism :P ). But, I think they could possibly work out quite well in the long run. It might flip the sexual market back the other way, or at least in the right direction, most ideally but unlikely balance …
/r/MGTOW18/10/17 04:02 PM
3

Same story as everywhere else (Twitter, MSM, YouTube etc). Women openly promote violent hatred of men, encourage and/or celebrate violence against men - left alone and allowed to say whatever they want without censorship. Men openly discuss problems caused by feminist ideology and/or women's choices in society, don't encourage hatred and violence, don't celebrate violence against women, merely discuss the problems that exist and ways to reduce the damage, work around those problems and adapt to …
/r/MGTOW18/10/17 03:33 PM
2

So much this. Maybe it applies to older women or women of higher social "class", but most women? Especially younger women? Many of them wear the same few outfits all the time IME. It's starting to look like young men actually rotate their clothes more than young women, they just wear the same pair of leggings or tight jeans often with the same shirt now. And guess what, I don't care. If it looks good on you, then why not wear it often?
/r/MGTOW16/10/17 04:34 PM
1

Another totally ficticious "male privellige". OK, maybe not "being able to" wear the same thing too much would be an inconvenience. The only problem is - it's all in your head! Nobody else cares. This is another trumped-up "hardship" created by women for women that has nothing to do with men. It's one I've heard and seen quite a lot, but it seems mostly just an excuse for why most women have a massive clothing collection far greater than they could possibly need... because they're magpies. Some …
/r/MGTOW16/10/17 04:17 PM
9

You hit on something major there I think. Men want sex almost entirely for pleasure, for its own sake, but women are more interested in other motives. One of the biggest of those is ego and self-worth, like you described. When women really want sex there's usually more going on than just want for pleasure or entertainment, they want an ego-boost, or to get a man to give them something, or whatever else. But it's not usually just for pleasure which itself proves that women don't desire the pleasu…
/r/MGTOW16/10/17 12:55 PM
6

God I hate this trend in films, one of the biggest things killing modern Hollywood films. They're shit for loads of other reasons too though, so I won't miss them as they destroy themselves. These Mary Sue characters go through a film without even having to develop/practice/learn at that! They often don't develop as characters or even simply improve their skills to defeat an obstacle or enemy, as is the case in real life and reflected in films - but not for women in films anymore. They're portra…
/r/MGTOW27/09/17 01:30 AM
5

Just to find her pussy you'd have to roll her in flour and look for the wet spot
/r/MGTOW26/09/17 01:39 AM
10

IMO a stay at home wife without kids to look after (or if kids go to school) absolutely should do all cleaning, cooking, shopping and any other regular house stuff and try her best with it. She should also work out for around an hour and try her best to improve/maintain her standard of appearance. All this still takes no more than 5 hours a day (being very generous there, should be more like 4 or less) so it's nothing compared to the 8-9 hours hubby probably works and should be done every day th…
/r/MGTOW26/09/17 01:27 AM
5

LOTS of men wanna hold onto "the dream" but it's a fairytale. These ideas that Eastern Europe / Russia / China / Japan / S. America / wherever are like totally good for men is clutching at straws of hope. There is no place where a man can get married and raids a family, have the woman be consistently nice in the long run, and not run the risk of getting totally screwed in divorce. There are just some places where the women have better standards of behaviour and appearance for themselves and/or l…
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 09:04 AM
4

No allimoney in Britain either, still dudues get their assets cleaned out in family court. There is NO way to win marriage anywhere! Had he said "date" I would have been cool with it, in those countries and situations with no "common law" or presumed marriage, or just not living together. But you just can't get married nowadays, it's such a huge risk you might as well play Russian roulette instead. It's the number one rule of MGTOW for a reason - MGTOW is about protecting yourself and your right…
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 08:50 AM
6

Or choose men...
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 01:02 AM
7

That's what it's all about at the highest level, maximally extracting work/energy/money from almost everyone - but mainly non-rich men - to keep feeding the insatiable debt-based economic machine with constant "growth". But there's another level doing the same but to feed women's collective insatiable greed with ego affirmation. The two are linked somewhat, and women's greed is used by the higher machine as a primary tool (more THE primary tool) to keep it all moving faster and faster.
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 12:50 AM
8

And the recent software patches to it only make it worse, by suppressing some of the ancient code that does still guide well and setting ever higher process priority to some of the other ancient code that now runs straight into awful bugs. Very importantly though, more and more users are becoming aware of these old inadequacies of the system and/or the malicious recent updates. These users are jailbreaking and trying to fix these problems themselves, with the help of open-source patches like "MG…
/r/MGTOW25/09/17 12:38 AM
2

Haha yeah I was stating the obvious. But what is weird is the amount of women who actually believe BP angel notions of themselves - despite knowing they're not like that they perform great mental gymnastics to hide from themselves and distort their self-perception. Now that's a whole 'nother level of delusion, and there are a decent amount of women like that - main examples are feminist perma-victims who are convinced they've never been the aggressor/instigator of anything and are always at the …
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 06:45 PM
12

Women are generally more redpill than men, feminists excepted.
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 10:45 AM
1

True that!
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 08:23 AM
2

So true this! Which means I'm fucked big time. Guys with shitty mums gotta break that cycle! But I always worry more about guys with doting/overbearing/over-nurturing/overprotecting mothers as they have a strong "mother need" and seem more susceptible to dependency on and manipulation by women. Us with crap mothers get an early taste of red pill and powerful warning to be careful with women and not get emotionally dependent on them (as we were emotionally dependent on our mothers then they treat…
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 03:05 AM
2

Just wanted to say I feel for you man, it could be hard with a family like that. Though I guess there are perks to having that type of family and/or culture, individual freedom isn't one of them. I know a couple of guys in similar situations in the UK, one lies to keep his family happy but lives nothing like how they'd want him to; the other goes along with things and seemingly does everything he's told. Both tough options, but the first dude seems much happier. There's possibly a better option …
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 02:56 AM
1

Good point. And it's not just her. We're never much more than "options" to women, even if the situation is marriage - where she's supposed to be committed and has supposedly done her choosing. Still just an option to compare against others, and she'll re-evaluate said options pretty darn frequently. Also in her words, the "exploring" is testing, whilst getting fun/validation/money/stuff from. But yeah no man wants to just be an option, hence many of us are 'opting out' and many more switching to…
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 01:58 AM
2

vent mode Though she advertises it as some great skill of hers, I bet she can't properly twerk or even knows what that is (IME that's usually the case with women who claim stuff like that - but small sample size), but can clumsily shake her ass around. What an achievement! Something almost anyone with hips and without arthiritis can do with some practice. Very little practice too, and many most young women can already do crudely. Even if she's actually good at it - and even if she can actually t…
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 01:22 AM
7

Job: master twerker Education: [university] of life Dumb way of saying no job and no education. If a guy put a similar thing would she give him a second look? Rhetorical question, nope.
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 01:01 AM
14

Bit like always eat before going food shopping. In both scenarios you'll end up paying for stuff you don't need or even really want if you 'shop hungry'. Still, there's a big difference in severity of the likely consequences - a ton of random food that will rot before you eat it, or wife who will also rot inside and out and then gets to eat you - I know which one I'd prefer.
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 12:19 AM
5

Now what happens to a female employee reading the guardian or jezebel, making a comment about how men are hired above women in some field because there's an "old boy's club" or the patriarchy? Oh yeah, nothing happens. And the only difference is genders switched and reality inverted. We live in a backwards society with backwards gender roles. Truth is lies, women are men, freedom is slavery etc etc. For real.
/r/MGTOW24/09/17 12:12 AM
3

words don't change objective reality. They change the perception of it, which changes people's aggregate/collective/average response to it, which changes objective reality. To logical people, words are words, they describe things and when we think of them we think mostly of the thing being described rather than the emotional connotations of the word. It means the same to us. But to people more feelings-driven, the feelings attached to words are more important and have more effect. Edit: This is …
/r/MGTOW23/09/17 11:54 PM
1

I think it's an innate/instinctive pair bonding thing evolved to give better child-rearing. The problem is that women don't have any such oneitis in return. Many do get temporary oneitis where they're a bit obsessed with one guy, but for very short lengths of time (on the order of months usually) but that's not like men's multi-year or lifelong (!) oneitis, and some women never feel that strongly about any man. So men get obsessed with individual women for years or even their whole lives, while …
/r/MGTOW20/09/17 09:57 PM
1

I think this also highlights something quite important that only MGTOW get and most other generally red-pilled dudes miss. The weird thing (from the pov of "red pill theory" if you like) is that Brad in the story seems more 'alpha' and more like a "Chad" (even his name ffs) than Jack. Brad keeps his emotions very controlled, is totally independent and makes decisions for himself, doesn't give her too much affection or seem to care about her too much, has just got his "dream job" so is presumably…
/r/MGTOW20/09/17 03:14 PM
2

That seems an age where hormonal changes can happen fast and dramatically. If you don't compensate for them they can be bad, but it's simple to compensate e.g. metabolism slows down -> eat less, exercise more. But even though it's simple most people don't change to adapt to it and it gets the better of them. Same thing applies to age/biochemistry- induced psychological/mood changes except those are much more mysterious and difficult to take control of / adjust for. Thing with women in general is…
/r/MGTOW03/09/17 09:49 PM
1

Don't know, but I've learned to beware of women with vaginas
/r/MGTOW03/09/17 09:25 PM
4

What makes it even cruler (or more glorious, depending on how you look at it) is how hard and fast the wall hits oftentimes. The natural aging wall is usually slower, especially for women who look after themselves, but the fatness wall can take full effect in under a year IME. Seen women go from fairly fit to nasty borderline-obese within a year as they get complacent with their looks/health or their naturally-fast young metabolism suddenly slows down. In those cases there's nothing gradual abou…
/r/MGTOW03/09/17 09:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter