TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

felidaeus Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by felidaeus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Whereabouts? I can't find a current list. Could you link me it?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:56 AM
–

And a heavy minority of MRAs are gay, and CAFE has a bunch of gays on their board, who by the way, are utterly choked about this.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 11:14 PM
–

Guarantee you there are, they use it to raise public awareness.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 11:11 PM
–

They are still men, and barred by their gender from all women's only resources. Which are pretty much all of them.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:14 PM
–

I want to actually ANSWER your question, CAFE is a domestic violence and resource shelter for men. THEY want to march, just as many women's shelters are.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:14 PM
1

If you're going to mock people's self-professed identities then don't expect to be welcomed in the queer movement Wait, isn't this what pride JUST did to CAFE? I can't walk into a chat forum without MRAs being denigrated as fedora wearing nacho munchers (even though most aren't). By your own logic the pride community is incredibly self toxic.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:11 PM
1

"Sex that you regret after the fact or were pressured into doing" is defined as rape. It's part of the whole 25-30% of women have been raped statistic.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:31 PM
–

ORLY? "Male survivors of the [Montreal] massacre have been subjected to criticism for not intervening to stop Lépine. In an interview immediately after the event, a reporter asked one of the men why they "abandoned" the women when it was clear that Lépine's targets were women. René Jalbert, the sergeant-at-arms who persuaded Denis Lortie to surrender during his 1984 attack, said that someone should have intervened at least to distract Lépine, but acknowledged that "ordinary citizens cannot be ex…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 06:04 AM
–

If you tell a blind man to walk straight and he then walks off a cliff, is it your fault? Disability and depression and mental illness kind of throw things into different lights. A history of calling someone names is completely different from telling them to kill themselves. Did the kids shot at columbine tell the murderers to "go kill a bunch of people"? No? Then it isn't the same thing at all.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:24 PM
–

"blaming columbine on video games" Did video games tell those kids to kill a school? No. Would they have killed if they didn't play video games? Probably. "The people on the internet are assholes for egging him on," So they egged on a mentally depressed man. Yes. Did he kill himself because they did so? Yes. Would he have killed himself if they were supportive instead of vile? Possibly not. That's pretty much how responsibility works. So the internet trolls can roll in denial, but the reality is…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:46 PM
1

Guys, this HAS to be a concern troll. Just stop replying.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:47 PM
3

You do realize that he was brought up to hate all things male? So wouldn't you think his analysis would turn out female?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:30 AM
-1

What I find ironic in this is that historically, the women MOST VAUNTED were the ones that weren't in their place. Just look at Ruth as an example, or Scheherazade.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:25 AM
8

How in the hell did this get on huffpost?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:56 PM
1

I wrote to Henry Makow about the original article: http://www.henrymakow.com/schoolaskedmychild.html At the end there is a note: He believes he is under a parental alienation attack. Dad has been writing every week to his 13 year old daughter and sending her money, but she never writes back thinking this is because his daughter doesn't like him (implied). This raised a lot of red flags. What daughter won't write: thanks for the money each week dad? Anyway, long story short, I sent in an email st…
/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:40 PM
3

OneY is supposed to be "male" talk. Like: "What's a good razor", "Recent studies show prostate cancer on the rise", or "What's a nice male scent for dates". Any political selfs or articles will usually get the: "this belongs in men's rights" spiel. You aren't SUPPOSED to talk men's rights in it.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 09:02 PM
1

Wow, a LOT of the people on that list don't have articles either....
/r/MensRights12/07/11 08:54 PM
1

This sub-reddit IS the citation if you actually read some of the articles instead of just the .selfs Every one of those statements has been shown multiple times. Excepting the "more men raped in prison" one; I've heard it muttered, but am not sure it is true. And the women control 60% of the wealth one, which I think refers STRICTLY to the middle class and is based on household spending habits. Also, the 3/4 of consumer shopping one I'll ignore because I don't know how they qualified it (althoug…
/r/MensRights12/07/11 07:49 PM
7

To be fair, the girl in the 17-18 category seemed to have the superior RESULT. She didn't develop anything innovative, but did discover a limiter in cancer therapy. The lower age brackets were kind of "huh?"
/r/MensRights12/07/11 07:28 PM
2

ATTENDEES gyrating in the lobby? Require. Mindbleach.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 04:45 AM
2

Thumbs up to our sisters at 2x for keeping it real.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:28 PM
5

This will be going to appeals court, where it will be thrown out. Won't change the fact that this guy will spend several months/years in jail, will lose his job, has everybody calling him a rapist, and will likely never get another solid job.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 11:22 PM
2

hmmmm.... This site has 3 posts on MR. I wonder if this guy could get in trouble for "posting" these after being explicitly told not to. I wonder if "someone" would stand to gain from all these. I wonder why on earth someone would be putting their name over EVERYTHING they do, including having a "friend" back up their identity. I wonder....
/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:35 AM
2

No, it's a self validating speculation, the best kind.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 08:35 PM
0

I don't know why someone couldn't have answered this instead of downvoting... "These HPVs don't just cause cancer in women. They cause it in men as well. Cancer in the mouth, cancer in the anus and those cancers are very hard to treat"
/r/MensRights28/04/11 09:35 PM
3

Right in the sidebar: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/24/2635486.htm
/r/MensRights28/04/11 07:54 PM
9

And ironically, they put an MRA as a poster boy for "nice guy". Plus a white knight and a sexist. Yet in the comments, they lambast the socially awkward, who are really just looking from validation from ANYONE by the way everyone says to do it: being nice. Look through those comments. Their description of "nice guy" almost nails introverts every time.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 09:01 AM
7

No it's a long-term SHIT thing for men. We're turning something we should try to be into a goddamn epithet. Let's add smart guy while we're at it too, and guarantee the downfall of civilization. These are the women teaching your daughters, and they're teaching them that guys who are nice, are really just after something. Guess what happens next?
/r/MensRights11/04/11 07:32 AM
2

That one you are talking about was performed in England. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6152646.stm
/r/MensRights07/04/11 07:03 PM
1

You can't include C any more, not legally any way. Might be able to throw it in there with an "objection" from the other side.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 06:47 PM
2

"So how does a woman go about 'locking her car'? " With the same advice I would give to guys (i.e. my younger brother, and sons/daughters I would have). Don't get pissed drunk. Don't go drinking with people you don't know. Make sure to have a single sober responsible person in the group at all times. If drinking/drunk, don't go off alone or with another person. Stay preferably in groups of three, the magic number. If colleges taught that instead of: it's your body do what you want with it, we wo…
/r/MensRights07/04/11 06:46 PM
1

Know.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 06:39 PM
2

Damn those sexist kids for saying what kids say! Stop projecting. When a little boy says: "daddy is stronger than mommy" (truth), that shouldn't be an excuse for feminists to call him a sexist patriarchal pig (had it happen, seen it happen, you never forget it), any more than we should say a little girl is sexist for being exasperated with her brothers.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 06:31 AM
2

It would be highly amusing if "I have not gotten anything" becomes most controversial comment.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 06:56 PM
1

"A modest proposal" is satire Reporting people are ACTUALLY eating babies is simply news.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 05:44 AM
4

insert dick joke ^ that's why not.......
/r/MensRights19/03/11 03:39 AM
1

I was thinking you were anthropomorphizing countries, but sure. And I agree, paris is kinda filthy.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 03:36 AM
3

Because all the angry women in feminism are told to go away because they discredit the movement right? I'm pretty sure without the angry women feminism wouldn't have even gotten off the ground.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 07:36 PM
1

A throwaway novelty account
/r/MensRights18/03/11 07:35 PM
3

Sounds more like France.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 07:33 PM
1

Why would you bother arguing with a troll?
/r/MensRights18/03/11 07:32 PM
1

It sounds a lot like a feminist mom (see "Every day is men's day"), who like many feminists is discovering upon having a little boy that life is kind of a shit deal for boys, and is having a hard time with the fact that she's been blind the entire time. At least she's learning though. Amazing the number of women I can count personally who this happened to. Staunch feminists until they have male children, then BOOM, at the throat of the school board every day, "What do you mean there are no boy p…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:12 PM
-2

Eh, arguably. The glamorization of single motherhood is a (in)direct attack on fatherhood. Glamorization of that by the women that the younger generations idolize is part of the problem. On the other hand, I thought it was only guys that idolized portman?
/r/MensRights04/03/11 07:55 PM
1

seriously? again? That's, what, 4 times in 3 days?
/r/MensRights19/01/11 12:48 AM
1

I am wondering why you think it is basically harmless? If there was a letter circulating insinuating that say, during martin luther king jr day, black crime will increase by 98%, and to be careful and write to your local mayor encouraging him to legislate greater protections against blacks, would you still say it was basically harmless? If it doesn't pass the racist test.......
/r/MensRights18/01/11 06:18 PM
1

At least in Japan the girls give on Valentines day and the boys give on White Day in response.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 09:21 PM
21

A different story according to CNN, with official statements
/r/MensRights12/01/11 05:41 PM
1

oh my god? this is a kids' movie? "daddy why is she crying?" "uhhhh....."
/r/MensRights08/01/11 12:47 AM
1

Indeed. I tend to read ampersand's blog for my opposing viewpoint. It has the best dose of reality imho.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 06:30 PM
1

I can agree its inconclusive, but that difference is in the area of 1-3% in most reports, and "some" of it could be attributed to sexism. As for the department of labour report, it isn't the only one out there. There are reports from the department of labour dating back to 1998 that put the wage gap at near 9%, and attributed most of what remained to non-sexist reasons. You won't find many sites that source that report because it is politically incorrect. It would be akin to a report saying that…
/r/MensRights05/01/11 03:38 AM
1

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/03/08/department-of-labor-gender-wage-gap-a-myth/ The report is there. See, I can give a scientific report. The best you will ever be able to give is an opinion piece that defines full time as 35 hours or greater. Per capita means nothing, it's just another fancy way of saying median, and it means nothing in a small sample size. Not to mention that you assume much. I was a champion debater. See, I have my sources, you have yours, but mine isn't a report that can…
/r/MensRights04/01/11 05:37 PM
3

Gnah, if most managers are male, then most male managers will make more than female. Plus when you are dealing with a small sample size wherein the wage fluctuates by up to millions of dollars... The mind boggles. I'm sorry, but an equal work for equal pay gap simply does not exist. People get paid millions to say it does, and have made it politically incorrect to say otherwise. Follow the money.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 06:10 PM
3

Um, not to diss that woman but was she one of those people that campaigned to lower the physical requirement bar for firefighting specifically to let women in? If she isn't buff, she's actually a danger to her colleagues and the people she should be rescuing. The others will definitely resent her for that. I've got no problem with a 200 lb gorilla woman with the strength of an elephant being a firefighter, but I think the average female simply should not consider a job like that a right.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 06:04 PM
1

From the comments. "It's a senate bill, introduced and sponsored by the senate's Liberals. It has zero chance of passing, and would not even have been introduced if the Liberals ruled in the Commons. The bill's sole and only purpose is to be something the Conservatives vote down, so the Liberals can get some press out of saying Harper is against equality for women." Oh look, it's the Canadian version of the "Paycheck Fairness Act". At least ours will never merit anything more than incredulous no…
/r/MensRights30/12/10 08:05 PM
5

This bill would never pass. Good thinking single idiot senator.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 08:03 PM
2

TIL that according to Twilight, women love this.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 06:26 PM
1

This bill doesn't look THAT bad. At least they are recognizing they should put money into STEM fields, and if they couldn't pass a construction stimulus without kowtowing to the NOW lobbyists, they sure as hell aren't going to pass a STEM stimulus without mentioning women SOMEWHERE. Really though, I just find it amusing how much time and effort they expend trying to get girls into STEM; I think there were 5 girls in my engineering class of 100, and almost a dozen female only scholarships.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 05:29 PM
3

Old News, and overturned. Yay Canada
/r/MensRights28/12/10 05:56 PM
1

She had to go to a room with less ambient light just to see him, and you honestly think the guy could see their kids? I thought we knew better than that in this sub.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 05:51 PM
0

Buh? For the Benefit of Newcomers with a Doctorate in English.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 12:06 AM
1

The correlation/causation thing was because he didn't make a correlation in the article, he made a causation. I agree that linking causation is ridiculous, but correlation is something different. As for the stimulus, you wonder why you have monster unemployment rates and a burgeoning debt? It's because "spending is spending" apparently. And yes, a lot of people were robbed, mostly men. If the best you can do is mocking me saying "social sector", you really need to brush up on your knowledge bank…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 09:07 PM
1

Correlation != causation. However, a stimulus package does have a causation thread to a better economy, but not if you pour that stimulus package into the government sector. The stimulus package WAS hijacked into the government/social (female dominated) sector, directly by feminist lobby groups, so in this case, there is a causation link between increased female jobs and economic collapse. No complaint with the rest, you are correct. One spot the west IS unique is in our crippling single motherh…
/r/MensRights19/12/10 07:21 PM
3

The most vocal person is always the one with the least to say. This is the same no matter what group you are in. Besides, an us vs. them mentality is a bit of a survival technique when them is actively trying to snuff you out. (although I am personally incapable of it outside of a sports scenario)
/r/MensRights19/12/10 07:01 PM
-6

Yes, we know, but at least this article mentions that the real problem is racism. Begin circlerjerk.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 06:54 PM
0

I don't swing that way, sorry.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 11:23 PM
1

We welcome you, but I don't see why people have to say "I'm for men's rights, but I'm a woman". See, we have no problem disconnecting gender from movement. In fact, a lot of MRAs have a bigger problem with male feminists than female feminists. The problem is that feminists insist on defining feminism as "representing women", and any attack on feminism is an attack on women. This gets them into no small degree of trouble from their own members, resulting in a general exodus from "mainstream femin…
/r/MensRights15/12/10 07:58 PM
2

The false rape thing is so common because it is so EASY. Thanks largely in part to the false rape society, it is one of the few issues that MRAs have a consistent message on. Plus, a lot of the feminist "research" on the subject has been revealed to be false and inane, making arguing it that much easier. As for the misunderstanding about feminism thing. The reality is that it isn't "regular feminism" that is prevalent in the government. You see "extreme feminism" at all levels of government. It …
/r/MensRights15/12/10 07:12 PM
1

To be fair, Canada's huge construction project stimulus went off without a hitch. My only complaint is all the traffic jams from road fixing.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 10:24 PM
-3

This. I sense a concern troll.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 07:05 PM
9

Isn't that post about malestudies, not mensrights? So what on earth does it have to do with mensrights.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 06:04 AM
8

So, no sandwich then.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 07:55 PM
2

I would think 21-26 personally.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 07:54 PM
1

This. Just look what happened to Joseph Tarnopolski.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 06:22 PM
2

You are welcome :) Honestly, I'm usually relegated to using spearhead or FRS for source linking which I can't help but feels hurts my point sometimes. It's nice to find a moderately low key site, so thanks for the chance at serendipity.
/r/MensRights26/11/10 09:13 PM
3

http://www.aswaterspassingby.org/statistics.html Has some of them. The single most dangerous place for a child to be is with a single mom and her live in boyfriend. Reading the site over it is refreshingly non-biased in the sources and statistics it uses. Yes it emphasizes violence against women, but at least it mentions male victims, and I certainly can't deny that more women than men DIE or suffer physical harm because of DV. Edit: Heck, I'm going to bookmark that to use again if someone asks.…
/r/MensRights26/11/10 08:30 PM
2

The biological father of a child is actually least likely to molest them. A mother is statistically more likely to be an "abuser", and I believe the list is topped by step parents.
/r/MensRights26/11/10 07:00 PM
1

That's not really fair, the FRS also mentions the rare reported instances of the opposite for false accusations. The thing is that guys will almost never report rape, let alone make a false accusation. To answer the question of how to avoid questionable situations for both men and women? Don't get drunk. It's not that hard.
/r/MensRights26/11/10 06:46 PM
1

Although to be perfectly honest, it's the one most espoused by the media. Similar to how most people on the internet see all christians as being fundamental southern baptists. They're the most vocal and get the most involved. The main difference being that on a fundamental level, everyone recognizes that fundamentalist southern baptists very willingly say "Other christians aren't like us", while the crazy feminists very vocally say they speak for all feminists, and if you're not for them, you're…
/r/MensRights16/11/10 07:16 AM
2

I only work with the quantitative here. What little advantages? Because I can give a metric shittonne of advantages girls and women get, but can't really name any concrete ones I've gotten simply for being male.
/r/MensRights11/11/10 03:35 AM
2

Just because 181 of 185 men are the executive of blue chip companies does not mean all men are executives of blue chip companies yet the "glass ceiling" is still used as an example of how "all men" are privileged. That idiocy works both ways. Sucks when it's used against you, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights10/11/10 07:36 PM
2

So all the couples that choose not to get married so they don't need all the legislative baggage associated with being married..... Are forced to count as being married. Brilliant.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 08:53 PM
2

Help the kid, and then don't let mom have the first word. If she gets it in, override her. Start by chewing HER out.
/r/MensRights28/10/10 05:00 PM
5

LEAVE r/MENSRIGHTS ALOOOONE
/r/MensRights25/10/10 11:25 PM
11

"Officials have not yet decided if they will take her child away" Uh yeah, seems dad cares a lot about the child. But I guess they've decided to stop pretending that dads exist.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 11:23 PM
28

Please. Who cares how much he actually makes. It's his earning POTENTIAL that matters. Can't pay? You obviously aren't working hard enough.You're a male, use some of that privilege to get an easy high paying job. Edit: Having read even more. It looks like they don't even care how much you could potentially earn, when you could instead pay alimony using "credit". Edit 2: /s
/r/MensRights21/10/10 05:33 AM
-1

I sense manhood101. STEALTHED. Ignore mode engaged.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 07:29 PM
3

I actually vaguely agree. However, based on the number of friends family who already seem in the know, it looks like their entire community is like it. Different strokes for different folks. It doesn't necessarily indicate anything about parenting abilities.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 04:00 AM
3

Wow, she has an open account too. It's like reading soaps, only scarier. People. MAKE ALL YOUR ACCOUNT INFO PRIVATE. Geeze. I know where they live, who they're dating, what they're doing, etc. etc. etc. Oh, and he seems like a pretty awesome dad.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 01:10 AM
3

Then why is it here? Especially with the title "Apparently Muslims can't beat the crap out of their wives" making it sound like a bad thing. I'm fully aware it isn't advocated, but I don't think it should be here at all. Delete it. Get it far, far, away from where it could be linked to us.
/r/MensRights18/10/10 10:40 PM
3

Ummm.... Is "being allowed to beat your wife" really something the MRM wants to advocate? I'd argue the opposite.
/r/MensRights18/10/10 09:16 PM
2

Yes, but when you say things like: "An economy does not a great society make.' It indicates that you are ignorant of the basics of society. People can't learn humanities until the quality of life has increased to the point where people can dedicate themselves to a trade that has no economical value added. As soon as you let the house of cards collapse, those sitting pretty on top have the farthest to fall....
/r/MensRights18/10/10 09:04 PM
1

Do you want to know why we have very little historical evidence of any "countries of philosophers"? It's because they all collapsed. Yes, humanities, especially history, are required. Reading and comprehension are vital. But how many people do we need to dedicate their whole lives and energy to it? Honestly?
/r/MensRights18/10/10 06:54 PM
5

HAI, canada speaking. Our stimulus plan was pretty awesome. One of the high points of the conservative reign. You see the "Canada Infrastructure Program" signs EVERYWHERE. In other news, traffic jams are at a record high because all the roads are being repaired.
/r/MensRights18/10/10 05:59 PM
1

Oh, and little boys. Did we forget to mention them too? Yeah, under the age of 8. No, 6. Wait, I think that 6 year old looked at me funny. 4. 4 year old little boys, you're subjugating them too.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 06:51 PM
2

Don't bother trying to post there. I posted a rather simple reply to a comment about how terrible patriarchy is and how a female run society would be better by saying historically matriarchys were worse. It got posted and then deleted. Saying anything other than that women are angels and men are demons will get your comment pulled or not posted at all. Remember: feminists don't like their zombies hearing contrary opinions.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 01:43 AM
1

I like how the author writes about how it just goes to show how conservative the US is. The author DOES realize that everything they talk about is because of the liberal PC agenda right? Right? I'm just really hoping the left wing isn't so blind that they see the idiocy on their side as coming from the other side.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 01:27 AM
2

My reply to their idiot nurse question: "I'm just thinking about a nurse who dated an engineering buddy of mine. She was fired, and my friend had some interesting things to say about it." "What did he say?" “I noticed that you said ‘he’ when referring to the engineer. Are you assuming the engineer is male? That’s kind of sexist, don’t you think?”
/r/MensRights13/10/10 07:14 PM
2

Glenn Sacks = Notified Edit: Holy crap! It worked! (see Pxtl's post) I also posted a comment to the site about how the MRM doesn't have the infinite budget of female groups (the comment looks to be in moderation?). They have to pick and choose fights because (drumroll please) they are marginalized. They can't fight every fight because they have to survive on their own without being federally recognized. I could make the same ridiculous argument about slavery. If the blacks were so against it, ho…
/r/MensRights12/10/10 04:49 PM
8

Who here posted this: "There is a whole source of new evidence to suggest that some of the research into family abuse has been politicized.[44] Sam and Bunny Sewell, Family Resources & Research state that "However, misleading statistics are a deliberate fund raising tactic for women's shelters. The shelter movement almost never mentions scientific studies" Bravo. Amazed it hasn't been removed.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:10 PM
3

I love their rebuttal, which includes a report on how men actually overreport domestic violence and from said report: "As evidence of this, men are more likely to call the police, press charges and less likely to drop charges than are women" My BS detector is going full on here.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:05 PM
1

Oh look, a strawman. THAT'S original. The OP is complaining about getting women pregnant. If he has so much difficulty with the concept of a condom/vasectomy/stable relationship +pill, then he might as well just either deal with the inevitable kid, or not bother asking for advice on how to be irresponsible.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 09:03 PM
1

"When did women win the right to abandon their children?" You did ask.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 08:59 PM
2

Any woman can take her child and abandon them in churches, hospitals, etc.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 05:52 PM
-2

There are also anti-abortionists in the MR movement as well.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 05:51 PM
0

Here's one of those choices: keep it in your pants until you get married. I know it's a tough one to handle, but the stats agree you'll live happier if you do. You just won't get sex with lots of random girls with STDs, the stress of random pregnancies, possible FRAs, jealous boyfriends, etc. That's what porn is for. Right now you come across as a bitch to your hormones. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess an age of 17. When some of the people here tell you to "Man Up", they're saying you ha…
/r/MensRights06/10/10 05:49 PM
1

Your chances of that are about less than being raped. In most cases you either didn't use a condom or the kid isn't yours. Occam's razor.
/r/MensRights06/10/10 05:43 PM
1

Ow! My Head!
/r/MensRights06/10/10 05:40 PM
12

Ironically, most of the /r/mensrights posts are from people who had real relationships. Given that 50% + relationships end in divorce, 75-80% are started by women, and they get the kids, alimony, and child support in 90% of those.... The comic does paint a sad picture of that near majority of real relationships. Of course, that doesn't take into account repeat offenders, which make a large portion. Keep away from single mothers, miss multi breakup, and divorcees and you're statistically better o…
/r/MensRights06/10/10 06:18 AM
9

Relevant: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/dmm6p/get_a_lawyer_before_sex_27_precautions_before/
/r/MensRights05/10/10 11:45 PM
3

Exploit me! Exploit me!
/r/MensRights05/10/10 11:45 PM
18

According to the comments on the linked page, victim blaming is OK so long as the victim isn't female.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 09:52 PM
3

I like the comments in it: "I don't believe that. Men always hit first." "It's not true, women are the primary victims of DV" THEY GAVE YOU THE BLOODY EVIDENCE!
/r/MensRights29/09/10 08:00 PM
4

Which is why I replied to that one..... almost 2 hours before you made that comment. If you bothered to notice.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 08:38 PM
2

I second that. A toast sah!
/r/MensRights28/09/10 08:06 PM
5

Since you deleted it, I'll just throw up the other canard you tried to feed us as being "the same" http://www.gazettenet.com/2010/03/18/verdict-guilty-rape-case-granby-man-gets-5-6-years-jail?SESS546bfea41aefed9ce244dc08f19923e8=gnews "Stone said the woman followed him inside his house when he stopped there to check on his dog. Inside, he said, they talked about relationships and their children, and each snorted two lines of cocaine, which he provided. Stone said the woman then initiated sex wit…
/r/MensRights28/09/10 06:04 PM
4

"http://www.oclnn.com/orange-county/2010-01-27/courts-crime/cousins-get-6-years-for-raping-teen-girl" Here's a better link for that story. You'll note that the two that got 6 years "pleaded guilty to one felony count of rape by intoxication related to the Feb. 27, 2009, incident" Whereas she pleaded guilty to "aggravated assault and gross sexual assault" Next you'll be comparing a schoolyard bully to jack the ripper. But I guess in the feminist manifesto, women can only be victims right? Here's …
/r/MensRights28/09/10 06:02 PM
3

glenn sacks is good. It does not allow comments and is about as neutral as you can get. I also recommend the http://falserapesociety.blogspot.org . It would make a great case study on WHY some people seem anti-female. They have good reason to be so on that site.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 05:34 PM
1

Now we can have meaningless sex while any products of that are taken from us, and anyone can accuse us of rape when they regret it in the morning! Yay! Empire building is for chumps, amiright? Who wants a stable life and a growing family? Only loser beta males.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 07:21 PM
3

Seen any female garbage collectors? Female plumbers? Those people give a lot more to society than any government worker.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 07:19 PM
2

"Adolescent girls are uniquely capable of raising the standard of living in the developing world. Girls are the most likely agents of change, but they are often invisible in their societies and to our media" Really? In a society that marginalizes women, these little girls are going to be "uniquely capable"? More likely they'll be stoned for heresy..... It will be useful because all the little boys taking classes with these girls will see that they aren't that different, and will start making cha…
/r/MensRights27/09/10 06:57 PM
2

Although in some places I can agree that it is needed, I can also argue that simply educating girls with no change in political attitude will get nothing done. They aren't really teaching how to fish here, they're just giving fish.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 06:52 PM
2

The writer doesn't quite get it. "This is because most divorces are initiated by women due to their husband's infidelity, as the fatherhood research body Fathers Direct points out" The opposite is in fact true, any non partisan study will tell you that most divorces are because women are feeling "unhappy and/or unfulfilled". Not to mention that there is burgeoning evidence that women are as if not more prone to cheating than men. Good try though.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 06:44 PM
2

Obvious troll is obvious. byebye
/r/MensRights23/09/10 05:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter