TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

feminicey Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by feminicey on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

In New Zealand, it is illegal to discipline a child through violence eg. smacking. Restraining a child from hurting themselves or others is legal however. I agree with it. As a trained nanny, it was illegal for me to use violence anyway, now parents are required to learn and use more effective forms of discipline too.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 03:51 AM
4

You're easily led. Sorry to hear that.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:54 AM
3

In fact the article doesn't make a claim that anyone called the cake sexist, just that someone said opponent to gillard are often chauvinistic and that he has defended himself against chauvinistic allegations. After a cake was baked. Do you are the double speak? Can you read between the lines of the article here? At best, it's rubbish journalism, t worst a deliberate attempt to misguide readers.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:49 AM
3

But I agree that it isn't sexist, and someone saying it isn't sexist is the opposite of someone saying that it is sexist. So who said it was sexist? I'm not saying anything about the definitions of chauvinistic and sexist. I just can't see who said the cake was either.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:59 AM
-1

Can anyone please show me where the theme of the cake has been called sexist? From the article linked and the link within that article, all I can see is it being called 'bizarre' and the cake maker claiming it is not a chauvinistic cake. Okay, fair enough, all true statements. Later in the article I see the sentence She said some of Ms Gillard's opponents were chauvinists. Yup, also probably a fair statement, on average. But I still can't see where anyone has called this cake sexist?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:00 AM
2

You make excellent points. We should ensure men and women have 1 - 3, 5 & 6. 4 is up to personal expression of the choices made available through ensuring all the other types of equalities you mention.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 06:33 AM
2

where the woman is portrayed as a damsel in distress Being portrayed as weak and helpless seems like a bad portrayal to me.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 12:33 AM
-8

That's true, and there's also the terminology of 'shove' - put would be more apt. Not every girl prefers it rough!
/r/MensRights17/05/11 08:16 AM
-7

I had you upvoted until I read this: Women enjoy having you shove your cock in them Maybe some women do. Please don't generalise all women. It's just as bad as generalising all men.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:56 AM
3

You can quantify discrimination now? How can you measure it? It's silly to get into a scoring war - men and women, boys and girls all face discrimination, based on their gender, race, sexuality, etc. etc. etc. Knowing this is enough for me to want to fight against it, and fighting between ourselves over "who has it worse" is silly.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 04:50 AM
5

Just the future king.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 01:13 AM
1

During a pregnancy, a woman in NZ is granted 10 "pregnancy leave" days which are meant to be used for things like scans as well as being generally under the weather from the pregnancy. I think the father should get the same sort of allowance at least for attending scans etc.; it's an exciting and important moment that both parents should share. Unless he's sick though, he wouldn't need to take leave on those days that the woman does due to sickness.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 12:24 AM
1

You're irrational. Take a deep breath and calm down.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:43 PM
0

That's an interesting concept and one I haven't heard of before. I'm assuming the financial abortion comes with some sort of legalised restriction of access to the child? There's still the issue of "dead-beat" dads... the reason child support and the DPB (Domestic Purposes Benefit) was introduced in NZ was a surplus of men willing to have enjoyable sex but not willing to enjoy their responsibilities and rights as a father of a child. In countries like America where healthcare is not socialised, …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:20 AM
1

I'm pretty sure in NZ (where I live) it's statutory rape on both parts because when a recent left-wing government tried to decriminalise underage-with-underage sex a few years ago they failed spectacularly. People took "12 year olds having sex with other 12 year olds aren't criminals" to mean "anyone can have sex with 12 year olds" which completely defeated the bill. I'm going to look into this more, because I'm very curious now about what happens in this situation and if it's been an issue yet.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 07:20 AM
1

Yes exactly. However I'm curious, what happens with an underage boy has sex with an underage girl and they conceive a child? I mean, they technically both raped each other.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 06:18 AM
1

I completely agree with you. In fact, the ideal situation in my mind is a 50:50 split of care and cost.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:38 AM
1

Of course the child is dependent on the mother. My ideal support/care situation is a 50/50 split in custody AND in costs. However, if that's not possible, to then assign greater cost to lower custody, to recognise the value of child care - as it is a job, albeit unpaid.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:15 AM
-1

You're right, that blanket statement needs a caveat; children's guardians, and the guardians of those deemed mentally unable to make decisions for themselves by law, have the right to decide on medical procedures that other human beings undergo.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 05:01 AM
0

But your analogy fails when you consider that the vehicular accident would not have happened but for the involvement of the passenger.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 04:35 AM
1

Because the legal system is twisted and unfair.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 12:28 AM
-11

Women and men should pay equally for the benefit of their children.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 11:35 PM
-5

The child is dependent on their father.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 11:25 PM
-8

A man should be held financially responsible to help raise a child that he created through the act of consensual sex FTFY. I'm never going to agree that a man should have the right to force pregnancy and birth or abortion on a woman. Who pays if the man doesn't? The government? Hah. Be careful who you have sex with, and don't be indiscriminate, then you minimise your risk of having to pay child support. Anyway, this is a derail. Your initial statement was just too ridiculous to leave. This threa…
/r/MensRights30/03/11 09:39 PM
-1

Sorry, I should have been more clear. What I was posting was my view and opinion.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 09:29 PM
-10

There's no need to bring personal attacks into this. I completely disagree that a man cannot be held responsible in any way for his own progeny. A man should NEVER be able to decide for a woman whether she has a dangerous medical procedure. There's no point discussing that further with you because you clearly see things differently and neither of us is going to change the other's mind.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 08:23 PM
-20

How does it fail? No person has the right to force a dangerous medical procedure on another person. If you consent to having sex with a woman, know that pregnancy is a real probability, and be ready to take care of your responsibilities as the father if she falls pregnant. Male rape victims that father a child as a result of the rape are omitted from that because they didn't consent.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 07:52 PM
2

Until it's happened to you I don't think you could possibly understand. Sure, ideally all rape victims would report it. Ideally, there would be evidence too, and the victims would be believed, and some magical way of easily telling the liars from the true victims. But there isn't. Edit - also, a bystander hardly goes through the same assault, invasion and horrific circumstance that a rape victim experiences. It's not even comparable.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 06:09 PM
0

(4) They make clear to rape victims that they have no civic duty to report their rapes, thus endangering other women The only person endangering other people is the rapist. A rape victim, regardless of gender, shouldn't be forced to report a rape, especially given the adversarial court system - people should be able to move on from trauma however they see fit.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:27 AM
0

Nothing at all, and the downvotes against you are from people who realise that and don't have an argument beyond "women are dumb amirite??"
/r/MensRights28/03/11 12:02 AM
1

Yeah, I agree, this is why I said "Apart from this which is obviously unfair". My question still stands: why is OP complaining that women are striving for all the other achievements, they all sound like positive things to go for.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 11:31 PM
1

Apart from this (which is obviously unfair) If divorce, then get custody of kids - cause I should not be penalized for working hard and, after all, they will be MY kids. What's wrong with what they wanted? In my eye, everyone regardless of gender should strive for a good career, to marry an equal, to not sacrifice their career for another person, to have children while they are fertile and healthy, and have the choice between working and staying home?
/r/MensRights27/03/11 09:54 PM
2

Many countries go along perfectly well without requirement for a draft, or registration for a draft. That said, a draft is likely to be introduced in a time of war especially when there is legitimate threat of invasion. The best time to remove sexism in the draft is in a time of (relative) peace. Now is the time to remove the sexism of the American system of registering for the draft.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 04:49 AM
1

Sexuality and what you are attracted to, I believe, is outside the realm of what can be called negative discriminatory behaviour. You're into whatever you're into, and no one can help that. I don't think sexuality should be included in discussions of sexism.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 04:39 AM
2

Your girlfriend has been misinformed as to true feminism. A man and a woman should have equal choices. End of story.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 07:31 AM
-4

In fact it is adjusted for education, age, ethnicity, etc. See page 32 of the report. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/Women_in_America.pdf
/r/MensRights04/03/11 06:02 AM
-1

Hah, this is so ridiculous. I'm not ruling out caring about the whole world because it doesn't fit with your idea of men being oppressed. There is no 'clearly talking within a certain scope' unless the scope is defined, and it wasn't.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 02:26 AM
-1

Okay, we don't agree, and probably never will, on that point. That's alright. It was nice trying to convince you anyway :)
/r/MensRights04/03/11 01:14 AM
-2

While it's true that that faceless influence often referred to as "the patriarchy" (side note: I hate that term) hurts men as well as women, I don't believe that men are oppressed, on a whole, because of their gender. That doesn't mean that men do not experience oppression. I insist on focusing only on women because I believe that women are oppressed purely because of their gender. *Edit - I see your edit - that would be "benevolent sexism". Ie, the practice of putting women on pedestals. It's b…
/r/MensRights04/03/11 01:03 AM
-2

I don't quite get what you're trying to say. ReluctantNihilist said, "women are (lol) oppressed". He didn't say "women in first world countries with many laws protecting their right to equality are (lol) oppressed". I know that on an individual basis, not every single woman experiences negative effects from gender discrimination, I would say that I have experienced very little in my life. But feminism is about ALL women.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 01:01 AM
-1

You don't think that on a global level, women are oppressed? Interesting.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 11:52 PM
3

Wouldn't it make more sense, if the woman truly needs and has spent the child support money on the child, for the real father to pay back the man who has been making these payments for so long? The real dad has a responsibility, surely?
/r/MensRights03/03/11 10:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter