TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

femmefatale1 Archive

View 0 posts and 68 comments by femmefatale1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Most of the guys sticking in the LTR struggle to find a girlfriend. They think if they leave they will be sexless AND alone forever.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 03:55 AM
49

If you want to be cynical, she may have slept with the last CEO.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/15 11:42 PM
2

Posting comments nad posts makes them money through content though. If you want to definitely cost money, you need to just lurk.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/15 11:37 PM
68

Nepotism, she is friends with the last CEO.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/15 11:36 PM
1

It's really going to depend on the mother and the caretaker. Sometimes, they will be better off with their mother and sometimes they would be better off with a caretaker. There are good arguments for both and it comes down to a matter of personal preference. True, but I can't imagine wanting to have kids with a woman who isn't very good with them. Maybe if its an accident this would come up. Care taking may cost an 8-10k but if the wife is making between 30-40k, it will be worth it. Hopefully, s…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 03:53 AM
1

The issue is that the society has largely eliminated long term consequences. People are expected to switch companies every few years to get ahead. People move around a lot more and maintain relationships for shorter periods of time. Screwing over your coworkers is a better strategy when you are only going to be with the company for a few years anyway.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 03:32 AM
1

Why does she get to stay at home with the child for the next 5-6 years and not the husband? Well for most marriages, the man is out-earning his wife. As such, it makes more economic sense to have the wife raise the kids. Additionally, breastfeeding is simpler if the wife is staying at home. You've heard of daycare before haven't you? That definitely is an option. I don't think daycares can provide the same level of care for kids that a parent can though. Additionally, daycare is fairly expensive…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 03:47 AM
1

Modern technology has made housekeeping duties relatively obsolete and she would better serve the family by going out and making a living. Basic housekeeping is simple. But if you want to have kids, those do take up a lot of time. The general arrangement is both people work until they have kids, then the wife cuts back on work or quits until the children reach school age.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 03:51 AM
0

When she gets bored and subsequently files for divorce because she's unhappy, then what? She's going to get the kids, child support and alimony. Being a housewife is all she's ever known and the kids most readily identify with her since you're at work all day. A judge would have no choice but to rule in her favor. It's what's best for the children. I think there is a miscommunication here. Nobody is advocating for turning a hoe into a housewife. That is a terrible idea. Some women though, do hav…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 03:34 AM
2

Only because people suck at budgeting. When you look at the costs they go for, much of this is way more expensive than it needs to be. I mean, 790 dollars a year on baby clothes is absurd. http://www.babycenter.com/cost-of-raising-child-calculator
/r/TheRedPill17/05/15 03:26 AM
1

STDs lower your SMV. Its not guaranteed, but on average guys who have a lot of one night stands are going to have more STDs and thus lower SMV.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 08:51 PM
2

I've talked to plenty of women (and read about plenty more) who have every intention of getting married someday -- they just want to start a career/make it through grad school/travel more/fuck more first. Right, but that demonstrates that marriage is maybe 4 or 5 on her priority list. She would rather be doing those other things instead. That isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it does mean they will put less effort into it than someone who puts getting married as there number 1 priority.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 08:48 PM
2

Point is that you can't really make a big thing about how awful and terrible Catherine Zeta Jones is for - gasp - contracting HPV (did he get it from her? We have no idea) while maintaining the idea that guys should be out there "spinning plates". I completely agree. TRP has some useful advice, but there is some real dissonance here. The guys here seem to realize that a high partner count has serious drawbacks, but they still want to have sex with a lot of girls. So they are trying to rationaliz…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 08:32 PM
1

I completely agree with that. The issue is I would have serious difficulty lying about what I believe, which would make it difficult to be in most churches.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 08:06 PM
3

It would depend on your life strategy. I mean, I wouldn't marry a woman who had an STD. Most quality women would not want to settle down with a guy who has an STD. If you intend to be single your whole life, then yeah don't worry about STDs, but if you want to settle down some day, then know an STD will lower the quality of partner you can attract. Its not fear. Its risk/reward.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 08:03 PM
2

It would depend on your life strategy. I mean, I wouldn't marry a woman who had an STD. Most quality women would not want to settle down with a guy who has an STD. If you intend to be single your whole life, then yeah don't worry about STDs, but if you want to settle down some day, then know an STD will lower the quality of partner you can attract.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 08:02 PM
-1

Its common for people to preach "get out there and have sex with a bunch of women" on this subreddit, so its worth noting that by having sex with a bunch of women, you are also lowering your SMV.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:59 PM
2

Yeah, normally I am a fan of the Red Pill but its odd watching these guys "hamster" around the issue. By having sex with a bunch of women, you are also lowering your SMV.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:57 PM
0

There isn't anything that effects men exclusively. You still have Herpes and Gonnoria. And HPV can give you throat cancer. Also, if you do get herpes or HPV most women won't touch you and if they find out after they can sue you.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:56 PM
-1

Remember, condoms won't protect you against herpes.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:52 PM
0

Are you suggesting that we men of /r/theredpill[1] practice sexual abstinence so as to avoid potentially giving our future wives HPV-related throat cancer? I wouldn't go that far though. Its a calculated risk for each guy. Personally, I avoid sex with high partner count women for this reason though.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:51 PM
6

but would it not also be an argument against men being promiscuous? Yes. Its less of an issue for men, but its still an issue. However, you will still see a lot of guys here trying to rationalize it away.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:49 PM
8

And that woman isn't by nature interested in marriage. She is just interested because her circumstances have changed and she is afraid of getting old alone.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:41 PM
2

The thing is, she has to have a basic idea what you care about in order to give it to you. Keeping her confused is a bad strategy for an LTR because you can't set boundaries. two can play that game and she's likely to win Yes she can get sex elsewhere, but hopefully there are other things you bring to the relationship that are harder to find. And if there isn't, well you shouldn't have upgraded her from plate to LTR status.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/15 07:29 PM
1

You can do exactly this so long as thats how you put it in the contract and you leave her enough assets to avoid destitution. You don't have to give a reason for divorce. Most states prefer you don't. You just can't put a conditional in it like "She isn't entitled to X if she gets fat".
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 05:30 PM
1

Outside of the newness aspect I disagree. For most guys, even if you do everything right you aren't going to consistently hook up more than a few times a week and you are going to have dry spells, which isn't that different from a decent LTR. The only real advantage is that if your SO decides to stop having sex you are out of luck in an LTR while you can just find new partners if you are single.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 05:25 PM
1

I am betting that is exactly why he put up the student loan offer. Its a peace offering. Makes you look good in court and hopefully convinces the wife to drop the issue.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 05:16 PM
1

You need to push the issue. If she makes it clear you aren't having sex, then you just leave.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 05:13 PM
1

His lawyer may have prompted him to pay her debt as a way to validate the prenup, but making one concession has opened the door. On the contrary, its a peace offering to avoid further legal battles. He can withdraw this offer if she wants to take him to court.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 05:06 PM
1

Because our culture has tried to push this idea that a woman with no sexual boundaries is "liberated" and that you should slut it up until you are 30 then settle down with mister right. Look how many sitcoms follow that exact storyline.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 05:03 PM
2

so you can't validate a prenup on the grounds that your wife gets fat and gross/withholds sex per section 5? The court does not want to have to make decisions like "Is this woman ugly enough to activate the clause?" and requiring sex is essentially prostitution. A fair marriage contract would say both spouses keep any assets from before the marriage and share assets acquired afterwards. If you aren't looking to actually share your life with her, don't get married.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 04:59 PM
2

Despite what others say, prenups are thrown out >5% of the time. what's the best way to ensure maximum effectiveness? Use a lawyer or mediator. Do it well in advance of the wedding. Record your discussion of the prenup. Don't insert frivolous clauses.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 04:54 PM
1

The problem is there is a glut of young people also moving to Austin to take those jobs. So its more of an employers market.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 04:52 PM
1

Seems pretty fair. Property acquired before marriage is kept by the original spouse. Property acquired during marriage is split communally unless its a gift or inheritance. There is alimony, but its fairly short term unless specific conditions are met.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 04:50 PM
2

Wasting time in a relationship does hurt a woman more than a guy. She is 31. Her fertility is already declining and is about to start declining sharply. If she wants kids then this is a huge blow. The husband(especially if he is wealthy) can just marry someone 10 years younger and be fine
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 04:47 PM
5

there is a large precedent of prenups being thrown out in divorce court. There really isn't. Only a small percentage of prenups get thrown out. They are just heavily publicized.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 04:45 PM
2

Definitely, I might be able to overlook a promiscuous past if the woman is a total freak for me in the bedroom, but if she is setting up rules(like this woman said she is), then its an instant dealbreaker.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 02:47 PM
2

It depends on the church. I know that at least 90% of the girls who went to one Church during my highschool years were virgins entering college. And I believe many were until their wedding night. The key is proper peer pressure. The churches that let in sluts will quickly degrade because its okay to be a slut.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 02:42 PM
1

You have to find the right church. Unfortunately the ones with the good girls tend to be the most exclusive ones.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 02:39 PM
2

She can't marry up but she can likely hook up with a guy way out of her league.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 01:57 PM
6

Look, you aren't going to convince a woman that you don't care about sex. It just won't work. The best you can do is convince her you don't need sex from her.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 01:24 PM
2

The thing is, if a generalization is true frequently enough, then its better to just assume its always true than spend energy trying to figure it out for each individual case.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 01:14 PM
0

disingenuous at least It really isn't. Its a useful statistic. If I am walking down the street in a seedy area of town, I can't automatically know who is poor. I can tell skin colour though.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 01:03 PM
8

Yes. The problem is that about 75% of women simply cannot take criticism. If I tell them they screwed something up, they will fight me to the death on it. They won't directly criticize others either. Preferring passive aggressiveness and gossip. Male employees may hate me, but for the most part they will listen when I talk and reply "yes sir". And women are much better at hiding their flaws during an interview process, making it hard to spot the good ones.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 04:40 AM
3

I am going off what they say. If we are talking about what actually works, then the rules are be attractive, maintain frame and be aggressive.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 01:33 AM
3

Its easy to tell the difference though. The problem with female workers is its hard to tell during an interview who is crazy or who is going to get pregnant. Women are good at hiding that stuff.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 01:32 AM
3

At my work place, 60% of the women are good workers, but 90% of the men are also good workers. So I feel much better hiring men over women.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 01:19 AM
3

The problem is its hard to tease these out in an interview. Heck, its illegal to ask if she plans on having kids.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 01:10 AM
4

Honestly, most guys don't have the ambition to be concerned about. The ideal worker drone is a beta male. The guy who daily schedule is work>video games>masturbate>sleep. He will do his job with no complaints, ambition or drama.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 12:52 AM
2

To make matters worse, she's failing to disclose important things like her sexual history or the fact that she has bipolar disorder I would warn the guy. Not because you owe him anything, but because it would be hilarious. She would have no reason to suspect you and you get a front row to the spectacle.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 12:28 AM
1

Yes they may be slutty but he will happily make the effort because they are "hot." You have to make an effort in order to get hot girls.The effort just has to be efficient.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 12:21 AM
8

Now that the economy needs less power tools and more powerpoints, it has realized women make better employees than men. Speaking as an employer, this is not true. The primary issues with hiring a women are: They are much more likely to start drama and passive aggressive infighting They get pregnant, which lowers their work performance for months
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 12:16 AM
8

You're not an alpha because you judge girls for the number of people they've slept with. Its a good idea to know the number, but you have to be careful about how you ask for it. A girl who has fucked a ton of guys is not good LTR material.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 12:13 AM
1

I have never felt bad doing this to a girl that deserved it. Cunts deserve to be called cunts, if I am get something out of calling them that then thats a win in my book.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 12:02 AM
3

I give this advice to a lot of people, but then you get hate from liberal arts majors who talk about getting a degree to "expand your horizons" while their parents pay for it.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 11:58 PM
3

You are allowed to approach them, but you have to do it as meekly as possible and only in a situation where she feels safe and isn't busy doing something else.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 11:56 PM
5

Here is the thing, its way easier for girls to get casual sex than guys. So unless you are an alpha male, its not going to benefit you. And if you are alpha, you better make sure you can keep your frame at all times, because any period of weakness and the sex she is having with an alpha male can convince her to leave.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 11:30 PM
1

Link isn't working.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:54 PM
1

Edit: Forgot to mention the coed that I was with has a boyfriend, and we're planning on meeting up at my place again soon. If this is the case, I hope you don't mean that you want to date the college girl. She is obviously not LTR material.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:46 PM
2

The thing is, you have to provide some level of validation to a girl or else she will leave. You just can't overdo it.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:41 PM
5

This is equivalent to "be celibate" if you are in a college town.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:28 PM
1

Yes. However, you won't land a 9 or 10 just because you use a red pill. The Red Pill will help you date higher up and, most importantly, insures you can actually keep a girls interest. Your SMV still matters though.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:22 PM
3

You won't know that a non attention whore miscer is a woman.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:20 PM
8

Why do university courts even exist? They can be useful for settling disputes where you don't want the police involved(drugs and alcohol) or academic violations(cheating). If someone is murdered at a university, you wouldn't take the accused to university court, so why do they do it in rape cases? Because the university court has a much lower burden of proof. Rape accusations absolutely should not be in a university court. They only get there because universities are scared of feminist groups ca…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:11 PM
6

And then we get a lawsuit over whether this clause is legal.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:09 PM
1

Its not entirely a win for students though. Often the non-judicial proceedings are there to protect students from a criminal record over minor crimes(most student judicial hearings deal with drugs and alcohol).
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:08 PM
6

Some people are not in a position to better themselves and need someone to pull them up. Then support programs to help the poor afford college. Don't make it based on race or gender.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:05 PM
18

Guys are afraid because any of us could be the victim of a fake rape allegation, and there is almost nothing we can do to fight back against it. Even if you aren't convicted, your name will be in the newspapers and internet. Nobody wants to hire a suspected rapist or be friends with a suspected rapist.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter