TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fff32 Archive

View 0 posts and 36 comments by fff32 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-29

I see /r/MR is now /r/atheism.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:16 PM
2

I dont think anyone is defending their actions but the protection of their identity until there has been a verdict.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 02:09 AM
7

So why is it ok for my car insurance company to charge me more?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:11 AM
5

Who was the first one to distribute the photos? Who is legally the child pornographer?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:00 AM
-1

obviously if they could reattach my arm i would want them to do that, but this comparison is not a good one as I don't want my foreskin after it has been cut off.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 01:27 PM
0

If I died I would have no problem with them useing any of my other organs to help someone who was in need. If my foreskin that was cut off and instead of being throw in the garbage was used to help someone with 3rd degree burns grow some skin back good.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 01:09 PM
-2

If their getting cut off anyways and I don't need them sure why not.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 12:00 PM
-3

I did not know this good find. Does this change whether or not circumcision is right or not though? In my opinion if they can take a by product of circumcision and then use it to growing skin for burn victims and for eyelid replacement, to growing skin for those with diabetic ulcers (who need replacement skin to cover ulcers that won't heal> Then I would see it as a benefit for circumcision not a negative.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 11:25 AM
-4

Skin grafts are used by the same persons skin and they would need a larger section than the foreskin to cover the area. As for the face creams it seems highly unlikely but if you show some proof i would love to see it.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:50 AM
-2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxjSFrGU5rg (NSFW) Because when baby grows up the surgery is more difficult and takes longer. With any surgery the longer it takes the more risk there is of complitcations. Am I saying that circumcision should be done on every child, no. Every parent needs to talk with their doctor and with their spouse and decide what is in the best interest of their child.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:22 AM
-1

I wouldn't say that they are old myths as the AAP just stated that Health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks less than a year ago.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:05 AM
4

We should really get a subreddit like /r/shittySO to put these stories in. Sure this pertains to MR because it shows how bad the legal system is to men, but does reading another story really make a difference.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:16 AM
1

He also said that she had been drinking yet said nothing about weather or not he was, I don't mean to jump to conclusions but the fact that he cant remember very many specifics leads me to believe that he probably had a couple of drinks as well.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:27 AM
181

I find it interesting that that is the only picture where they say that we stopped.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:21 PM
5

a) he didnt take the money b) probably right
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:08 PM
0

Interesting, why the difference? Perhaps because adults are more likely to sue if it's painful or there's a fuckup? It is because the surgery is more difficult and takes longer. Untrue, it makes the clitoris easier to find and keep clean. I'm not sure you've elucidated us on the benefits of circumcision though.> A decreased risk of urinary tract infections. A reduced risk of sexually transmitted diseases in men. Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:58 AM
-2

Cost of infant circumcision typical is $165 adult circumcision $1650. FGM is not comparable to circumcision because it has NO benefits to it what so ever. It has long term consequences that circumcision does not such as recurrent bladder and urinary tract infections cysts infertility an increased risk of childbirth complications and newborn deaths
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:06 AM
-5

when the surgery takes 5 to 10 minutes.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:57 AM
1

Yes people argued with him but did they argue about whether or not circumcision was right or wrong no, they went right to the same thing they always do they said why not just let them grow up and decide for themselves. So they just change the subject.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:34 PM
-1

The problem this sub has on this issue is that the majority mind has been made up and so they will not listen to any counter arguments and when a shitty study like this comes up they jump all over it without even thinking about is this a good source, and is the survey any good.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:27 PM
0

except for there are more complications as the child gets older and the surgery is more difficult so its not as black and white as we would like to believe it is.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:23 PM
5

How does your argument have anything to do with whether or not 300 is a big enough sample size for this type of research.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:17 PM
1

I would just like to point out that the reasoning of let him decide when he gets older is not a very good one as the surgery is more difficult and has more chances for complications. however the benefits of circumcision are very small and although they may out weigh the risks of circumcision, it in most cases is not worth it.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:26 PM
-1

I don't understand where all this about no medical value is coming from over the last couple of decades there have been multiple studies saying that there are advantages to getting circumcised. The problem with circumcision is that it is impossible for a child to make a decision and circumcisions have a greater chance of complication as the child gets older. So someone must weight the benefits to risks, now should this be done as a country as a whole or should this be done in the family and allo…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:23 PM
0

In my opinion saying that a penis has been circumcised is much more descriptive than saying that it has been mutilated. EDIT:I'm not saying that circumcision is good I am merely saying that your rational for calling all circumcised penises mutilated is not correct and that people do not say whatever they want even if it might offend someone.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:10 PM
-3

So do you call mentally handicapped people retards. Because as you say they are mentally retarded and so therefore why change the word because it might offend them.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:44 AM
16

But that is all from the father. So by signing the petition we are doing the same thing that the judge did, we are listening to one person without doing any further research. I'm not saying that the father is a bad person, from the story it sounds like he doesn't deserve any of what happened to him.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:18 PM
1

But would you say it to someone with Down's. I conceded already that you think that circumcision is mutilation. From what I gather on men's rights the majority of people's opinion on the matter is that circumcision isn't wrong but it shouldn't be forced upon a child it should be left for an adult to decide if he wants it done. So now lets say that this grown adult want his penis circumcised. There is NO reason for you to call that man's penis mutilated. Just because something is a fact to you do…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:58 PM
1

but you missed the first half of your definition, you can't just pick and chose what you want to use. To build off of your nose example it obviously isn't the norm to chop off people's noses and so therefore the it would be of a large amount of people's opinion that it has been mutilated, but possibly not everyone's. Now I can concede that circumcision may be mutilation to you, but it is not to everyone and people who believe that they made the right decision may find it offensive. Lets say you …
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:24 PM
1

Actually it is still personal opinion...
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:07 PM
1

"to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts: Vandals mutilated the painting." Not necessarily injuring disfiguring or making imperfect as perhaps your personal feeling is that at circumcised penis is the perfect penis. "to deprive (a person or animal) of a limb or other essential part." ESSENTIAL Again I'm not for or against circumcision I just like to point out the other side.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:21 AM
0

But, unfortunately other people are going to read your post other than the person that your are arguing with.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:13 PM
1

Do you really think that making fun of other peoples penis's make your argument any better. I can say that your argument is good enough to stand on its own. Personally I don't know which side I am on and I don't need to know because I do not plan on having children anytime in the near future.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:55 PM
0

"Not everyone in Africa is intact and there is going to be a much higher rate of transmission and infection regardless of whether they've been mutilated or not." I think that the important fact here would be to see if men who have been "mutilated" have a lower rate of transmission, yes this rate would be higher than say in the US, but would it be less that those who are not circumcised. On a side not can we stop calling circumcision mutilation as I think it would be offensive to people who chose…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:25 PM
1

They way that I read the article I thought that they said that having a circumcised penis gave you a 60% less chance of getting HIV when having sex with someone who has HIV. Therefore the amount of people who have HIV in Africa wouldn't really make a difference. I may be completely wrong in how I interpreted the data though.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:23 PM
7

Why are rates in Africa not relevant in other areas of the world?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 02:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter