~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | TIL in the city of St. Louis it is illegal to "refuse to provide for the support of [your] family"... But only if you are a married man.I see what you mean now. I agree, it's an old carryover, and I feel unlikely to come up, but you never know when someone could use it to throw the book at someone in a bad situation. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/13 10:41 PM |
| 11 | TIL in the city of St. Louis it is illegal to "refuse to provide for the support of [your] family"... But only if you are a married man.Well, not quite. It's illegal to refuse to provide (financial) support. If you aren't asked/told to do it, then you are free to be a stay at home dad. It's just not your choice. Naturally. In a way, it's worse, because you get no choice, but your wife does get a choice. That said, I would hope that the law isn't the final arbiter of choices made in a relationship, but I'd still stay away from St. Louis. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/13 01:36 PM |
| 4 | Empowered response to desperate men using female-only subway cars in 8 countries: “Be A Man campaign is a grass-roots effort organized by female activists in an effort to shame men into avoiding the women-only cars."So I'm going to go a bit against the grain here. Consider the countries this is happening in. Examples: Iran, India, and Egypt. These are not countries generally known for equality. In fact, these are countries where women generally don't have many or any advantages, and are in fact oppressed in many ways. While it may not be true of every single country on the list, for most, this actually seems like a justified way to protect them given the culture they are in. Is it a good long term solution?… | /r/MensRights | 10/09/13 10:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter