TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fifththrowaway Archive

View 0 posts and 261 comments by fifththrowaway on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

There's a nonzero chance I have your personal info and can find your body while it's still warm enough to be fun
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 09:02 PM
2

A homosexual male is struggling to understand sexually selectivity? Say it ain't so
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 06:57 PM
–

Im eager to see team vulva’s DARVO defense. We need to make a betting ring on what phrases they’re gonna use. My money is on ‘reactive abuse’ She’s gonna be fine. Perform a round of White Woman Tears, and a youtube apology video in disheveled makeup and oversized sweater. She’ll have a book deal and a podcast in no time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:57 AM
8

So as long as you ignore the increased likelihood of the Bad Thing happening, it’s okay? Low effort ragebait.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 11:48 PM
–

Please, the heteros are taking.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 10:15 PM
–

I'm not neurotypical It's still classified as a disorder. No amount of internet randos coping is going to change that fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:46 PM
1

No. I'm just calling a spade a spade. There's a reason the condition is classified as a disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:29 PM
1

Being high-functioning is its own thing, independent of autism. Neurotypicals can be high functioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:18 PM
1

Being high-functioning is the good thing. Autism is the disability you succeeded in spite of.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:04 PM
3

every accusation, a confession
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:49 PM
–

Nah, the Nietszchean concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 02:47 PM
–

So is porn. If that thing called love is a sufficiently similar stimulus, we're already too far gone. That's just the Last Man
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:28 PM
–

Denialism is the first step. Keep us posted when you inevitably find out
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 09:07 PM
–

The thing with the other guy didn't pan out. That's what happened, even if you're convinced it didn't
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 08:48 PM
1

A parasocial relationship to a nonsentient machine is delusional. That exploration or sense of control is a flimsy cope. She's fundamentally the same as a pornsick man. Another sad rodent pressing the supernormal stimuli lever, in a cage.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 08:40 PM
1

At 105 kg, the only thing he needs to get on top of is a diet
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:02 PM
0

As per the male monolith regulations, I'll be too busy cheating and/or leaving her
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 07:57 PM
1

And it's still a shitty metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:49 PM
2

High quality is going to be in the minority, whether it be men or something else. You’re just noticing the problem because of the income difference, and the metric you picked just hides it from you better. Hence the harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:46 PM
1

The potential harm is it can select the problem you're trying to avoid. The real insecurity is rooted in his compulsion to perform his gender, and failing to do so. The income disparity just reveals it. If he was going to meltdown over not being able to afford something, he'll meltdown over other things. All the high income does is provide a convenient mask to slip by your defenses. Eventually he'll have a high income, and a partner coddling him every time he has a tantrum for not feeling like a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:20 PM
2

And it's a bad metric. At best, it's useless. At worst, it's actively harming you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 04:41 PM
5

That's a dumb heuristic. There are plenty of men who outearn you and have malignant insecurities. And there are plenty of low earning, emotionally secure men. This rule is an emotional support tool and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 04:37 PM
2

I had the same issue with women on apps; I noticed about a 50% flake rate. To counteract, I would just double book dates in the same time slot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 03:32 PM
1

👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:46 AM
1

Nah. That love is false, and delusional behavior is an erosion of control. This current generation of AI induced psychosis is pathetic. Imagine letting a bloated auto-complete break you. Future generations will point and laugh at these cases. Well deserved.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:45 AM
2

Most BPD cases I've seen involved family members profoundly relieved when they die. Especially the adult children.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:34 AM
2

Cool it with the antisemitism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 04:45 AM
4

Personality disorders like BPD are less a disease and more a clinical declaration that someone just fucking sucks as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 04:44 AM
–

At four years old, I’m impressed that he can drive the car. Naked or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 10:14 PM
–

I share 98% of my DNA with a chimp and 60% with a banana, replacing my biological offspring with either is ridiculous. Massive phenotypical differences occur with fractions of a percentage of change. You're either being incredibly dishonest or incredibly retarded with this argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 09:26 PM
–

*The RedPill (TRP) as it's known here dies out\*. Heterofatalist feminism will overrun it, with it better defined vision for the future and more palatable flavor of biologic essentialism. The true sexual strategists (current iteration: performative males), will continue to evolve and adapt. They'll neither know nor care about the history of a gaggle of 00's-10's internet dorks fetishizing a scifi movie (written by tranny twins). Bluepill is an incoherent concept. It's just the outgroup/muggles f…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 09:12 PM
–

Most of the resentment I've seen is from the ones who don't get to participate, and those who scrape by and notice women complaining about the second order effects of having too many choices. Men dying of thirst will resent those that drown
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:43 PM
–

You're being too generous but your underlying premise (people having a selection bias) is accurate. There's a good segment of males who are just unfuckable, and have to wheedle and ply for women they aren't attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:27 PM
–

I experienced the same thing when I dropped 60 lbs. All relationships are transactional, womp womp
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:17 PM
–

Is it gonna help you pass your math test?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:09 PM
–

Thank you for the context; she seems a little too pragmatic for this current wave
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:33 PM
–

I'm not aware of that reference, and google isn't yielding anything
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 05:18 PM
–

The last clause suggests a kind of quid pro quo
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 04:22 PM
–

Does this hell bar have large breasted women?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:20 PM
–

Like I said, skill issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:09 PM
–

they show me their breasts
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 09:35 PM
–

Honey, you sound fat when you use those as loose perjoratives. Those words have actual meanings, and the diagnoses require BMI measurements, intrapersonal/psychosocial distress, and obsessive/compulsive features. Arbitrarily declaring other people's lives as disordered just makes you look dumb (and lazy). I'll enjoy my sub 12% bodyfat throughout the year, increased energy to do the activities I love, and reduced all-cause mortality. All while eating foods I like eating. Enjoy being wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 08:50 PM
–

Overweight and obese people's body signals are distorted and unhelpful. Healthy levels of caloric restriction are often going to induce hunger.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 07:21 PM
–

skill issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 07:13 PM
–

I'm talking more about the larger culture outside your immediate family and group. And it's not really being hungry all the time; the body eventually adapts hunger cues after a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 07:12 PM
1

Most good advice is going to be uncomfortable. That means it's a threat to status quo. Most of the women I counsel on weight loss aren't interested in confronting that they're the problem. Other demographics seem to respond better there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 06:36 PM
1

Yeah, because you probably associate restricted eating with disordered eating. Because you're in a culture of excessive eating. The truth is that the most common eating disorder is binge eating disorder (aka: being a fat fuck). And I'd reckon most westerners have a subclinical form of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 06:26 PM
0

2/10 low-effort ragebait. Stop deepthroating Israeli cock and look up what 'strategic objective' means.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 06:08 PM
1

As long as you redefine what victory means, you never lose. Braindead nationalists are an endless comedy source.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 05:19 PM
1

Unless this graduate level math, this is because you suck at studying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:45 PM
0

Most of them don't want to understand it. Normal distribution and probability don't feel as nice as smug self-righteousness. And they're all about feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:41 PM
0

Missing the point this hard is self-absorbed, yes. And if I was a 3, it would be accurate to call me a 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:27 PM
1

Many such things will appear weird/sad/offensive. Being that self absorbed and unwilling to think outside one's perspective will do that to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:14 PM
0

If she was squarely average looking, sure. FYI: The number scale is an attempt at objectivity, not a means to coddle solipsistic women. Hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:59 PM
2

Nah, let someone else get run over by a overweight Proud Boy in a Dodge Charger
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:40 AM
1

Who is saying that reciprocal care is wrong? What a strange answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 10:07 PM
1

Then you must care a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 09:59 PM
1

Oh honey, you are allergic to honesty. You keep leaning on that statement because you can’t address what’s actually being said
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 09:27 PM
0

Nah, it's a clarifying question to parse your word vomit. Please stop projecting your dishonesty onto me. So why are you butthurt about mandatory paternity tests?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 09:00 PM
0

Riveting. I take it you think paternity fraud is a non-issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:58 PM
1

Why? Is Fourth Wing not spicy enough anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:48 PM
4

Oh wowie, I know this game: [X] your issues aren't real [ ] your issues are exaggerated [ ] your issues aren't fake or exaggerated, but are ontologically distinct/inferior from Our Issues, that should take priority [ ] you deserve it Tag me when you start sliding down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:44 PM
1

Neat. You can just as easily cherrypick TRP'ers making vague concessions to women's struggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:27 PM
3

It's identity politics. Your in-group is full of diverse individuals who deserve individual consideration and respect. The out-group is the cause of all ills and to be judged collectively. Make endless concessions for your ingroup, and hold the outgroup to a high level of scrutiny. Posture as a victim to whine and beg for shit. TRP uses the same playbook feminists do, just way dumber and clumsier
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:14 PM
2

So basically (to me at least) it seems like they always make excuses for men, but women have to be perfect and sinless. #meninwomendominatedfields
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 08:05 PM
1

That's good commitment to the bit. The dishonest and smug routine is a classic, but your execution is awful. Unwarranted entitlement isn't a fix for poor mate selection. Hope this helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 07:57 PM
6

And a Real Woman doesn't talk back and knows her place.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 07:41 PM
–

Pro-lifers when you tell them the social programs they cut are to reduce infant mortality: 🤬
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 11:44 PM
–

That sounds pretty cool ngl, blue collar work looks gratifying apart from the whole body deteriorating part with some trades
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 11:05 PM
–

Im just trying to instigate, and acrylics are supposed to be cheap
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 10:58 PM
–

Too generous. Conservatives are too dumb to think that far ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 10:56 PM
–

Acrylic nails typed this
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 10:52 PM
–

You first
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 10:30 PM
–

That's a good sign to switch companies
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 05:26 PM
–

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 05:24 PM
–

holy shit that's a good line.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 08:52 PM
–

More work for less pay. The interesting stuff often gets sent out to specialists, leaving you mind-numbing routine stuff and dead-end whodunits Your scope of practice will continue to be castrated by overreaching money people that try to scrimp pennies, while somehow managing to increase overall costs. Their salaries will continue to soar, while yours stagnates. Primary prevention (i.e: making changes to prevent problems from starting) is where you are most effective. This requires a patient who…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 08:48 PM
–

The time and energy commitments can suck the person in for years. Many of their loved ones don't understand and fail to work around it. The security is a huge benefit. And you don't ever have to worry that your work is meaningless. It's good for those who like to learn a bunch
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 07:37 PM
–

Waiter, my steak is too juicy and the lobster too buttery!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 07:27 PM
–

Having a partner go into a healthcare profession is a goodway to speedrun separation/divorce, from what I've seen. In terms of juice-to-squeeze ratio, it's just not worth it. But I'm a little more jaded being in primary care.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 07:14 PM
–

medicine. don't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:55 PM
4

What a moronic statement. Sexual orientation is relative to the sex of the partner, not their orientation. Just own up to being homophobic
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:52 PM
–

.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:38 PM
–

The GI Jane look is in, go for it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:37 PM
–

That's just awful, and certainly not a good representation of the males at large. I would never think of subjecting dogs to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:22 PM
–

Ignore the haters. Shave the head
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:20 PM
–

Very good post. I liked it better on Twitter 2 years back
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:13 PM
0

I don't think you have anything to worry about there
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:03 PM
-1

How did I miss the point? You came in with your mind concluded, and threw the most convenient strawman you could find. It's a common tactic among the intellectually dishonest. And it's not, but go off.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 09:02 PM
1

Nah, that's just your anchoring bias. Non-addict males reduce women down to an aesthetic object all the time . It's a common feature of narcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 08:04 PM
2

Snooping this chick's post history reveals some gems: Regular poster in eating disorder and self-harm subreddits Vegan In childcare/education (that takes 8 years? lmao) And now she's getting jealous of children. What a peach
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 07:56 PM
1

You do an excellent job of missing the point entirely. Your condescending rhetoric needs more work though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 07:39 PM
–

Wow, this is the dumbest take I've read here this whole week. Even worse than the lillith post. Congrats
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:16 PM
–

There’s a reason why Andrew Tate is a household name. Please, please, go touch grass
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 06:51 PM
10

We did. That's why it's illegal
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 07:31 PM
15

One example is perfectly legal and routine behavior. The other is punishable by law. You're right - that's an enormous double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 07:14 PM
2

You just don’t like this specific source. Not particularly, no. I mean it is a garbage-tier review wi obvious conflicts of interests and 2 confounding factors you didn't bother to find out. I'll let you figure the those out, unless the chemo is stopping you from reading too. But that's not really the point. It’s just annoying how people aren’t willing to do their homework and educate themselves. It's even more annoying when smarmy nobodies make sweeping, authoritative claims and get butthurt whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 07:10 PM
1

You make vague gestures at 'studies', get pissy when others ask you to show your work, and then call others lazy? Lol. Lmao even. And, as expected, a shitty pop-sci article as a source. Did you even read the literature review by Singh? If this is your work ethic around simple stuff, I suspect you're also slow and have trash lifts. Am I right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 06:44 PM
1

Studies have found [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 06:26 PM
20

It makes him a criminal. For committing a crime. Your whataboutism isn't the gotcha you think it is
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 06:09 PM
3

Like I said, you’re adding other muddling factors to distract from this fact: a preference entails a plain ranking of desire. Simple as. She is still attracted to short men less than tall ones. Which is why you purposefully left out a tall Christian man in this hypothetical
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 03:34 PM
1

The overwhelming majority of women are boring (yes, that means you too). This gets compounded when they're subjected to social pressures to homogenize, and lean into the passive dating role. Dating seriously involves ruthlessly culling the boring ones. Dating recreationally involves tolerating that milksop long enough to get your rocks off.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 02:41 PM
5

Just because a woman says she prefers tall men, doesn't mean she desires short men less. That's literally what a preference means. All else being equal: (short<tall)=(tall>short) Just because you can throw in other muddling factors to compensate for their being short, it doesn't change what a preference means.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 02:33 PM
–

The opportunists use that same line as well. Funny that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:36 PM
1

It's me, I'm the old man. I've got a Werther's hard candy for you
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 07:41 PM
1

lol. lmao even
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 06:24 PM
0

Maybe try working on your personality?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 06:23 PM
0

lmao, that literal autist is better at communicating than you. I love it. Edit: /u/JustMoreSadGirlShit bahahhahaha. i believe you
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 04:12 PM
–

skin-to-skin transmission and non-virgin women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:43 PM
–

Because that kind of progressive posturing isn't about listening to their pet minorities. It's an in-group purity contest between hyperprivileged white people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:24 PM
–

the women here I think that helps to answer the question
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:11 PM
–

sir this is a Wendy's
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 09:16 PM
2

Looks come with entitlement and other problems. Severely diminishing and then negative returns. Mid girls are ideal. Preferably one that grew up even uglier
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:41 PM
1

Lmao you got nothing. L
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:43 PM
1

Because of this radical notion that you don’t need a vagina to be a feminist. I know your programming didn’t include that, but try and keep up. ideological possession is a trait that is found in all humans, regardless of political sensibility, or what they have dangling between their legs exactly the same thing Nah, you’re just interpreting the same thing because your brain is turned off.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:39 PM
1

Explain how that’s me saying that. I’ll wait. Cool reflexive script. And applying a premade conclusion where it doesn’t apply. By your own criteria, you’re more npc than anyone else in this chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:31 PM
3

Most npc-core response possible. Hilarious Im curious: How am I saying ‘women baaad’?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:26 PM
1

Ideological possession. Similar thing happens in mainstream circles with feminist rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 08:21 PM
1

Muh context Lmao. Your default position of guilty-until-proven innocent is excellent. Keep pumping out bangers like those.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 07:53 PM
2

I know you're not. That's why you keep doing it. I kinda fell off browsing here for a while, so I'm not that up to date. But I remember you had a pretty solid track record of retarded takes. I got a backlog of your recent stuff to catch up on. Tbh, you had me hooked after you victim-blamed male genital mutilation victims. Solid lolcow perfromance. You're no Lillith or EconomyShake yet, but you're getting there.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 07:39 PM
3

Same reason you embarrass yourself here: some mixture of hormones, poor impulse control, and failed parenting
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 06:47 PM
–

The latter half picks up. I see, the classic I-was-only-pretending-to-be-retarded conceit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:51 PM
–

I like to imagine them as trembling Chihuahuas struggling to get their paws up to the keyboard
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:46 PM
–

What yaoi comic is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:43 PM
–

it’s like how guys love reading action thrillers and military sci-fi. Self inserting themselves as the big man hero guy. except instead of self inserting as an action hero, they are a colossal whore
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:40 PM
–

So you're hiding behind a facade of self awareness to feel superior. Yaaawn. Even the normie media got wise to this delusion (Bojack Horseman)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:36 PM
–

Nuh uh I'm not the pathetic one for coming here and posting, YOU are And they say women aren't funny
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:29 PM
–

Feminine, loser mentality. Keep whatever self serving standards you want, and get as much as you can negotiate. No reason to care about their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:23 PM
–

Worst as in uncomfortable? Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:15 PM
–

This is girl logic. The most demeaning thing you can do to your competitor is go easy on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:09 PM
–

I love your weird hate-boner for therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:06 PM
–

You nailed it. You're the safety option she fell back on after her true preference fell through
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 06:58 PM
1

They all became corrupted by Culture Wars bullshit. The seduction had some rudimentary, but good, stuff going up until 2011.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 10:12 PM
–

Go look up the phrase 'necessary but not sufficient'
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:03 PM
–

The 'women dont enjoy sex' thing is an ancient psyop. A psyop designed to allay concerns of paternity fraud. And the reflexive male disgusts around female promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:00 PM
–

Imagine being a socially maladjusted male hung up on other people’s metrics. Clowning on you aside, overweight women is good news. I want to immediately know which people are low quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:08 AM
–

NEET it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:50 AM
–

no idea thinking is hard for you, I know. Tangent: what do you do for work/study?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:45 AM
–

It has a certain kind of appeal. That whorish, sex object aesthetic. The one you’d never introduce to your parents but think back to fondly once you’ve settled down with a quality woman Fun fact: cosmetic surgery in females has a strong correlation to increased suicide rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:17 AM
–

Amazing. This is the most braindead take of the week. You’ve outcompeted feminists. If technology was sufficiently advanced to uncouple humans from their own reproduction, then what makes you think sex and gender wouldn’t be affected? This transhuman speculation conveniently preserves the working categories of male and female. It’s almost like it was whipped up by a small, angry creature; too busy masturbating to their revenge fantasies to actually think.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:14 AM
–

The people exploring this fringe stuff usually weren't winners in the standard sexual market.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 11:14 PM
–

This is a dakimakura level of pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 11:12 PM
–

If they’re complaining about something on their profile, odds are good they fell for it already.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 10:33 PM
–

It's because women run excellent PR. They'll engage with social perception instead of just the face value logic. If any discussion has a potential to damage Team Woman's position, it's an enemy combatant and must be destroyed. True or not. If some men are doing something problematic, it's a man problem. If women are found doing something problematic, it's a people problem. Notice how all the vile, sexist stuff women do gets neatly tucked away under the umbrella term of patriarchy. Which is colle…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 03:08 PM
2

Those with some kind of insecurity or attachment issue (i.e: most of them). I usually experienced a certain demographic. Middle/upper-middle class women of either midwestern caucasian or first gen asian descent, wi average to above average intelligence. Kind disposition, and a strong, stable connections to their families.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 05:53 AM
4

both! You'll need to keep it going longer for the latter group
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 03:18 AM
8

I grew up with women in an affectionate family. So intentionally manufacturing that kind of emotional unavailability felt clunky and backwards. It still worked
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:37 AM
12

mild levels of toxicity at the early stages (aloofness, social dominance/degradation) covert displays of promiscuity/fuckboy status most importantly: adopting a certain detached affect somewhere between benevolent sexism and light contempt
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:17 AM
17

Terrific. Before, I was getting stood up, scraping the bottom of the barrel, and lucky to get lukewarm text replies back. After taking their advice, my hookup rate skyrocketed. Most of them were with women much smarter and successful than me, funny that. I now have a quality partner of 5 years who's honestly out of my league; a true needle in the hay-stack of women. Your disbelief isn't the clap-back you think it is. It's a necessary component to this kind of success.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 11:39 PM
–

Anyone above room temp IQ goes for convincing dupes. Unless there’s a functional component (e.g: outdoor gear, cars) a replica can’t capture, the item is just cultural capital.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 01:12 AM
–

is the camp taking applications?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:11 AM
–

Girls have been masking and drip-feeding their unattractive traits for centuries. It’s time for you to learn. Or become a eunuch.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:09 AM
-1

Women are more empathetic Women excel at inflicting social damage. A good fitness trait for a time in society where physicality matters less. Women are more conscientious about their health, and are more proactive about taking care of themselves Women play as a cohesive group very well. This is why they'll rally to defend random women they don't know from male criticism, and why 'pick-me's' (defectors) arouse contempt. I like women because of their boobs
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:47 PM
–

post physique
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:13 PM
–

golem get ye gone
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:12 PM
–

It's what you deserve.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:09 PM
1

Shoot, you're right. Updated it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:12 PM
2

Freely express your sexuality and preferences when you're young, relatively powerful, and unencumbered. 'Sexy' is raw and visceral. Approach a time when looks begin to fade, bills need to get paid, and goals need to be met. Redefine 'sexy' to mean a useful and productive male. It's a great (dual-mating) strategy. Completely unrelated: Sheryl Sandberg has been divorced twice Edit: biography revision
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:34 PM
–

IIRC, Nagle's Kill All Normies mentions that they're part of the new counterculture, something that leftists are none too happy with
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:35 AM
–

This mirrors my experience of those boards. Often vile content under a unique aesthetic
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:19 AM
–

Between the other attendings' sexual harassment and outright abuse, that remark ranked pretty low. Plus, they're not wrong. My weight counseling is gonna fall on deaf ears if I have visible rolls. It's the same reason you don't see ugly people in derm or plastics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:28 AM
–

Most body-shaming and fat shaming is female-on-female. Males are an accessory to this trend. Tangent: I've actually been lectured by attendings over that tweet's idea. If I don't present a healthful image, my patients' will be less likely to take any of my health advice seriously. Especially if it comes to weight loss and lifestyle management.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:13 AM
–

And now all you can do is deny personal accounts while ignoring the stated mainstream trends. A move that's predictable as it is pathetic. L.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:02 AM
–

Cool. You can keep narrowing the goalposts and you'll still be wrong. The SlutWalks, and all their adjacent movements, directly address the issues surrounding ncount, and there isn't a week that passes by without manufactured outrage about an older generic male A-lister celebrity dating women under the age of 30. Personally I can account for two age-gap relationships. One at the age of 17 where the girls was 16.5, and the other where I was 21 and the girl was 18. They involved others spreading p…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:42 AM
–

In this microcosm of a subreddit, sure. Otherwise, the predominant whiners have been and continue to be women. Body positivity has been a mainstream movement since the 10's. Which is around the same time as when SlutWalks began. The concept of male gaze has been pushed by feminists for 40 years prior. You just pay disproportionate attention to the whining males, ignore your ingroup, and mistake that for an objective read.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:25 AM
–

Opportunistic, mercenary women with shrinking options Women who mature and change preferences Both groups exist. Having a heuristic approach and treating all of them as the latter group until otherwise proven has some merit. But outright denying the latter because of the former is toddler-tier reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 08:05 PM
–

Braindead take. I have a long history of awful behavior to women. It has never impeded my dating life. Meanwhile, I have male friends who are far, far, kinder humans than me. They volunteer for the deaf, hold back their careers to take care of their sick parents, and believe in pop-feminist concepts like affirmative consent. Do you want to guess how their dating life is doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 06:27 PM
–

You can do that to all of them. It gets easier when you train yourself to not take them seriously Fun fact: women respond better to a benevolent sexist than they do to an egalitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 04:10 PM
–

Yikes sweety, you're not foaming at the mouth over [current thing]? Sounds like you need to do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:55 PM
1

You're right, there is no cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 02:42 PM
3

Neat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:36 PM
6

Because women want to have their cake and eat it too. She wasn't willing to commit. But she was still expecting him to be a good dog and lie in her safety roster. Eager to provide ego boosts and emotional labor when needed, and be a backup option if she can't find anyone. All for some headpats. Sleeping with her friends is a no-no. Bad dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:45 PM
–

bipolar This is a sub for borderlines though?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 05:50 PM
115

I'd assume it's a heterosexual women talking about men, for a few reasons: Projection: She values career and education in her mates, so she assumes they must be thinking about her career and education. Same reason why low-IQ males send dick pics to solicit women. Self-centered people who think their values are universal. Passive voice: Dating is a thing that happens to her (i.e: 'the right one comes along'). A female privilege. The 'intimidation' trope. Convenient method used by women to dismiss…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 03:51 PM
–

The kindest (=/= nicest) thing to tell them is that they're all single for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 06:28 PM
–

This is a new subreddit to me. After a cursory glance of the top posts of the month, I found: Woman asking how to cold-approach and ask guys out. A woman asking why men won't stick around for anything besides sex. She is at a loss, saying she's accomplished, confident, self-reliant and all these other traits that women would want from a man. Bonus treat: a seething lesbian in the comments trying to lecture male posters on what's attractive to men. Two separate posts of women complaining about th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 06:15 PM
–

talk bad about overweight women That's pointless masturbation. It's going to make you look worse, and not do anything to hurt the opposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 04:17 PM
–

Taking a break is not a option, since that would destroy two years of progress. This mindset is exactly why you're burning out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 04:07 PM
–

Because you're not after sex. You're after what you think sex will provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 04:00 PM
–

Good point, it's an excellent filter for low-quality women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:32 PM
–

It's not rare at all. Most women I know finishing up their residencies and secondary training are dating up in terms of income. I've only observe two exceptions, including my own pairing. E.g: OBGYN female resident paired up with high earning finance bro Derm female resident paired up with high earning finance bro FM female resident paired up with Ortho guy EM female PA paired up with EM MD. Homewrecked the last girl (now that I think of it, not a single APP I know is dating down in terms of inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:26 PM
–

I'm being condescending, but go off. Wow an Indian from India said the word?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:47 PM
–

I gave plenty; the bottleneck is your poor comprehension. The loudest, most aggro pro-India folk I know are bottom-tier Ismai'li's with Scheduled status. Meanwhile, I'll hear whiny horror stories from Delhi land magnates who make 5 times more than you'll ever make. Here's another gem: unironically using the term 'untouchable' like that outs you as clueless. You'd get laughed out of modern Subcontinental anthropological discussions. say something of value lol You first. Right now, you're just tal…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:41 PM
–

I just did. Caste status doesn't correlate well with their opinions of their home area. Too many other factors in play. untouchables bahahaha. High school social studies it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:13 PM
–

The same way some men dangle faux-commitment to get sex, some women will dangle faux-attraction to get commitment/resources. Men, like women, are (rightfully) concerned of being fleeced by these bad actors. It's natural to treat the 'husband material' designation with suspicion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 06:42 PM
–

Not really, no. Top caste people are just over-represented in the US in general because it's easier for them to migrate. Do have firsthand experience with the caste system, or is this something you learned in high school social studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 06:41 PM
–

Too big and diverse an area to make that kind of sweeping statement. I know 1st gen immigrants who have fond memories, and others you couldn't pay to go back.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 06:26 PM
–

true feminists don't hate men I guess Donna Hylton wasn't a true feminist either, what with her murder/sexual assault/torture of men. And neither were the other ~5 million feminists who gave her a platform and a central role in the 2017 Women's March. Neither are those feminists who comprise enormous political base supporting the Duluth model. Or the ones pushing to keep the legal definitions of rape skewed against male victims across multiple Western countries. Or those involved in defunding an…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 04:39 PM
1

It's pretty much the same 1-10 scale, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:09 PM
1

Hot Babe, a holdover term from the early 00's PUA community where RP gestated.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:43 PM
–

If the sex was unenthusiastic or forced, and I felt like other areas of the relationship were lacking in care and attention; then sure? I think my motivation to cheat is mostly driven by whatever hormone soup I'm wading through at the moment + w/e suitable female is around and receptive. I don't entertain that motivation either way. That said, I'm probably not a good representation of the average male (a very pick-me statement, I know).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:10 PM
–

It would sting to read, ngl. I'd try to open a line of communication to try and improve her experience. Either way, I'd stop being bothered by it in about a week if there's not any other red flags going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:01 PM
–

No. Yes. I absolutely would break up. She decided to broadcast that stuff to other people behind your back. It speaks volumes about her values surrounding sex, trust, and friends. Low quality woman; recreational use only.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:54 PM
–

I just don't get it. If you have a man you want to marry, and he isn't popping the question, why is the go to idea leaving him? They have very limited time, their bargaining power is declining, and men are notorious for stringing women along with the promise of some future relationship upgrade. Setting a boundary around progression timelines makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 05:36 PM
–

The visceral, immediate attraction is a reliable signal. Easy to spot, and verified with a commodity that males highly value: sex. The 'built up over time' attraction is viewed with deep skepticism, and for good reason. If a female wanted to dangle that carrot as a means to get resources (financial, social, emotional, w/e), she could easily push that grift. That road usually leads to choreplay and begrudging duty sex for the male. I'm not saying this form of attraction doesn't exist; it's just a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:58 PM
–

Yes. It's their version of the same old revenge fantasies. Disenfranchised class gleefully planning how the oppressors will finally get theirs. The Wall is the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 04:21 PM
2

Valuable for what? Valuable for a short term sexual encounter? Stable childrearing? Increasing group social status? Depending on the value system you carry, you're going to have a different answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:46 PM
10

Standard male defect: the benign ones don't understand how covert the predators can be Men have a blind spot when it comes to recognizing the sexually coercive men in their midst. When a typical man thinks of a rapist, he pictures a thug roaming the streets at night. Not the football quarterback who has a reputation as one of the “good guys” despite his popularity, but prefers to fuck the HB 6 who is black out drunk instead of the sober HB 8 throwing herself at him all night. When a man thinks o…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:16 PM
–

Same reasons women bash the small minority of men they chase after and embarrass themselves over. The belief that shaming them can get them to do what they want. Along with some mix of envy, entitlement and resentment
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 03:01 PM
–

Not about my partner, to other people. Especially not about intimate stuff. Chalk it up to that annoying toxic masculine trait called loyalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:36 PM
9

Nah I'm pretty sure she'll drop her panties once you dismantle her position with FACTS and LOGIC
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 06:46 PM
21

You should tell her that speech bro, then she will surely fuck you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 06:34 PM
1

ex wife
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 02:49 PM
–

Tell his wife’s boyfriend to take away his video game privileges
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 03:15 AM
–

That's just the anoxic gasps of your humanity. Journalists lose that in no time!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 01:48 AM
10

Very true; insults should be catered to the target’s sensibilities. It’s just funny to see all the smug progressive women willing to resort to shaming somebody’s body or sexuality when it suits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 07:21 PM
–

if it doesn't escalate naturally Cute euphemism for 'he has to do it'.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:50 PM
–

Therapy is a scam Objectively wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 05:14 AM
–

You were her eager little texting buddy. Free. Safe. No needed investment from her.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 05:06 AM
–

It's a weak person thing. It's not gender specific. Banter is a good way to filter out the fragile chaff
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 12:37 PM
1

But if you don't respond then they'll think your silence means they won the debate The opponent won't be persuaded. Pointless to try. The real victory is convincing everyone else watching.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 01:22 AM
1

source?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 10:54 PM
2

No, that's just another dishonest strawman you're insisting on because you don't have an actual response.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 10:23 PM
3

Yes, the mother is complicit/responsible for her baby's circumcision. I know your knee-jerk reflex is to minimize women's agency whenever convenient. That trick doesn't work when it's against a literal infant
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 06:28 PM
1

1700 W
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 03:14 AM
3

Ballpark estimate of what you could power with all that backpedaling
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 03:11 AM
3

700 W
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:56 AM
5

i would love to see one of these comments for the first time ever. suddenly becomes we’ll compare and see who’s using that biology BS excuse the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:51 AM
1

Less than 5 minutes and you've already shifted goalposts
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:46 AM
1

Hide and dissemble? Yes. Purposefully? Usually not. It's mostly just a mix of cognitive dissonance, self-deception and limited experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 12:31 AM
1

they’re choosing bad men and making bad decisions. Rare to see someone applying the same standard to both sexes. Harsh, but fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 12:24 AM
2

This attitude died off with 56k modems. Online dating is pretty mainstream now. Caveat: the type of profile someone makes on OLD will determine how seriously I take them. But that's common to most social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 12:19 AM
1

He cannot prefer low n-count women without thinking women who have had multiple sexual partners are “worse” somehow. That's a heavily loaded statement. 'Worse' in terms of what? You can interchangeably use that word to refer to some metric of human value or worth, or how strong a candidate they are for a role. Those are worlds apart in terms of how you regard and treat a person. The moralizing language you choose to use (e.g: lesser, damaged) conveniently muddles that distinction. I don’t need y…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 11:47 PM
3

It's hilarious that you keep doubling down on that poor understanding, but don't let me get in the way of that moral indignation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 10:25 PM
4

You are literally saying "it is not their fault but it is their fault" You're ignorant about the difference between fault and responsibility, and you've mistaken that ignorance as some kind of moral clarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 02:53 PM
2

In other words, the act of having sex somehow damaged women in his mind That's a huge leap of specious logic. Men who hold that damage mindset are a subset of low n-count preference men, not the entirety. A high n-count male can easily have low n-count preference for relationship w/o subscribing to that mindset. They’re just gross, and make my skin crawl, sorry. Most honest statement in the whole post. You can just stand on your own feelings of disgust; no need to find some distorted logical arg…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 02:47 PM
1

have you tried shaming them harder?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 01:08 PM
1

You made it seem like it's not an issue Go ahead and prove that for me. I'll wait :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 06:22 AM
1

Yes, and?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 02:40 PM
1

k.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 02:28 PM
1

My initial guess was to run it form a rate per 10k/100k population in the US, assess how women take precautions or subjectively deal with it, and then compare it to how other phenomena with similar/higher rates are dealt with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 11:29 PM
2

I like this hurried retreat into subjectivity (I know math is hard bby), but you need to polish up your passive aggressive digs and pop-psychoanalysis. These are mediocre character attacks at best. For buzzwords: 'triggered' died in 2010's. Maybe try using 'insecure'? 'fragile' is a good one, and I think 'toxic masculinity' still has some mileage. Try again :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 11:26 PM
1

Point two isn't a binary decision, but a matter of degree. The whole reason I laser focused on probabilities and criteria and all that is to try and arrive at a more quantifiable metric of that risk, and check for inconsistencies in reasoning And it's a gender wars debate sub. Science denial is part and parcel across both sides :/.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 11:01 PM
1

There are ways to increase safety and mitigate risk; a feelings-oriented approach is an exceptionally lousy way. And I'm not faulting the desire to feel safe, I'm faulting people who make distorted truth claims on that basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 10:46 PM
3

lmao they're literally all non-zero probabilities with severe outcomes. The whole point is to lampoon how ridiculous that exact criteria is, which she later recanted/adjusted. Cool word salad though. What other emotional turmoil do you want to project onto me ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 10:38 PM
3

I think I understand it fine: women, collectively and on an individual basis, reserve the freedom to decide what precautions they take. Am I missing something?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 10:18 PM
6

And there's another strawman. People aren't obliged to uncritically accept whatever truth claims you make. This applies doubly so when those claims get used to justify restructuring society; or allocating financial, cultural capital. And GHB assault is an exceedingly rare minority of the subset of drug facilitated sexual assaults. Bringing that nail polish up is a great way to damage your own argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:52 PM
9

I'm making no estimations either way on that. I'm saying feelings =/= external reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:33 PM
4

The controversy is how much precautions and how much cultural focus is warranted given the relative risk. The controversy you're describing is just another strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:24 PM
3

If those men were going to shoot down objective data, a bad faith argument won't fare better. The former would have a better chance convincing onlookers sitting on the fence. The latter just paints you as someone who can't objectively prove their point, and used emotional reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:05 PM
10

feeling unsafe =/= being unsafe. If those feelings don't correlate to reality, others are right to label you as paranoid and irrational, any truth claims you make on the basis of those feelings can be dismissed. That's why talking about probabilities matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 09:02 PM
4

If you had a discrete threshold, then you knew exactly why the parent post asked about odds and this was a dishonest reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 08:33 PM
7

Why would I respond to those? Because they qualify for both of your criteria: non-zero probability and severe outcome. It's not my problem you struggle with consistency. Why does math threaten you so much? statistically at a point where it is worth addressing So you're admitting that there's a statistical threshold that makes an outcome worth addressing. And you're backpedaling on your prior criteria. I think you just answered your original question :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 08:03 PM
9

So where's your maul-proof, flame-retardant HAZMAT suit? Also: Sarin gas attack dimethyl mercury exposure papercut to the carotid artery by rogue paper plane idiopathic genital prolapse I eagerly wait for the precautions you're taking on all of these non-zero probability, severe outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:48 PM
9

And what you're avoiding saying is that the risk assessment and plan drastically changes with the given probability. Taking extreme caution with a 1 in 5 chance is sensible. Doing the same thing with a 1 in 10000 chance makes you a paranoid lunatic. That's why you went and picked an outrageously inflated probability instead of the real one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:35 PM
10

Off the top off my head, here's a list of outcomes with a non-zero probability and worse severity: silverback gorilla mauling in the suburbs spontaneous human combustion meteorite strike to the head lassa virus hemorrhagic fever What precautions are you taking for these?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:28 PM
12

It does matter. Let's correct your analogy to the actual failure rate: If a parachute only had a 20% .01% percent chance of not deploying, would you still go sky diving? Notice how the answer changes?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:07 PM
14

Because that's how you can determine if the concern is rational or just histrionics
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:04 PM
1

Irrelevant to my point but ok. her choices are hers to make Sure, she has the freedom to make those choices. Others have the freedom of association. This "owns a woman’s body" rhetoric is a strawman to selectively recognize one freedom, while denying the other; all while gussied up in a victim posture. You can sexually shame and morally browbeat all you like. You still don't get to decide the selection criteria other people use.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:45 PM
1

Ok, so you're limited to a subset of men who choose to open up to women about these issues, specifically to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:42 PM
1

The funniest part is that your knee-jerk sexual shaming is proving his point, while you think it's some kind of comeback.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:36 AM
1

That logic runs on the assumptions that guys who just want sex also want it immediately, and that the method only weeds out those (and other undesirable) types. Otherwise it's an emotional defense strategy that makes sense. It does produce downstream problems, since its eerily similar to using sex for leverage and promotes a system that produces bad actors. That debate won't be resolved or have a clear winner. Each side has different incentives and different value systems that they won't budge o…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 07:49 PM
1

Every single time with that apex fallacy XD
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 07:10 PM
3

block everyone who disagrees you =/= everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 07:05 PM
2

Whether it has a discrete metric or not is besides the point. This is not the gotcha you think it is but keep ranting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 06:49 PM
1

Then you can appreciate that you have a bias by the nature of being an observer. 'Super insecure and bitter' men's responses across the board are more noticeable. That doesn't mean* other subsets of men aren't experiencing similar emotions. You won't notice the men who don't perform those histrionics. Or the ones who dipped out, citing societally acceptable reasons. Or the swaths of men who saw the bad deal early on and refused to invest. So either you have telepathic insight into male brains, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 05:01 PM
1

What a convenient definition of confidence and health you've assigned to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 09:51 PM
2

Bitches/hoes have great casual utility at the expense of long term viability. "Good" girls have great long term stability, but aren't the short-term fun kind. This dual strategy has been around for ages (e.g: Madonna-whore complex) Your previous post was getting close, but now you're just projecting female preferences on males. Not much different from the slack jawed dudes sending dick pics because they'd like to receive nudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 12:56 AM
–

Yep. About as reasonable as the female delusion of the bad boy that softens up only to them. The partner is a narcissistic trophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 12:43 AM
–

It doesn't matter to you, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 12:35 AM
–

You're right: some women do experience personal growth and their priorities change accordingly. Others are just opportunists, or just lying to themselves. Both groups will claim to be the first.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 12:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter