TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fiftyshadesofred Archive

View 1 posts and 104 comments by fiftyshadesofred on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe-haven_law Maybe you should know what you're talking about before you misinform others. Safe haven laws aren't gendered. Financially abandoning a child you fathered simply because the mother wants it and you don't is not at all similar to safe haven laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/14 04:27 AM
1

Ladies hide your husbands and boyfriends, single women still view you as the competition and your man as fair and very desirable game. This concept is totally disgusting to me. I would never fuck my friend's boyfriends or husbands, it would feel incestual. I want a partner that's mine, not a partner who can compare me to the rest of my social circle. If my friend's pussy has been anywhere near a man's dick, I'm instantly turned off even if he's my type. shudders
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/14 12:25 AM
1

And the answer is, no. In your opinion. That's the thing, there are plenty of people who would say yes. Are you a particular authority on the matter? I highly doubt I'm speaking to a rabbi. My neighbor actually is a rabbi though and his adopted son is from columbia. His son was raised jewish and subsequently converted to orthodox judaism all without getting circumcised. He's accepted in his community and no one pushed the circumcision issue. Look, if you want to make a case against circumcision,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 05:27 AM
6

Don't even bother with this one. She resuscitated a 3 week old thread and now she's not even trying to support her arguments. /u/Lynn1975 is pulling the internet equivalent of putting her hands over her ears and going "nahnahnah" while refusing to give anybody the last word.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 05:01 AM
1

I'll kindly ask you to stop personally attacking me by making assumptions about what I believe, what I do or do not know, or who I am. I haven't made any assumptions about you, I'm arguing a point. Don't make it personal. It's possible to convert to Judaism or Islam. You don't have to be "born into" it. If an uncircumcised adult converts to one of these religions and chooses not to get circumcised, are you saying their faith isn't as valid as a child's who was born into a religion and circumcise…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 04:49 AM
1

I'm totally willing to consider differing viewpoints, provided that they're rational. I'm all for medically necessary circumcision, phimosis runs in my family. What I don't understand is why anyone would feel it's appropriate to permanently alter a healthy child's body for any reason, religious or otherwise. You've failed to explain how I'm strawmanning. What's the difference between medically unnecessary circumcision and foot binding, lip plating, or artificial cranial deformation? All permanen…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 03:56 AM
1

Wow, you've made it crystal clear that you're unwilling to consider any position that differs from your own. Thanks, bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 03:30 AM
1

Children do not have bodily autonomy. This is one of the most ridiculous arguments I've heard outside of TRP. Yes they do, it's protected by law. If children weren't entitled to bodily autonomy, things like molestation, abuse, etc wouldn't be illegal. Children are also allowed to make their own medical decisions under certain circumstances, the age varies by state but I think most start at 13. The only reason circumcision isn't protected the same way other infringements upon a minor's bodily aut…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 03:06 AM
1

Wow, this is soooo old, but.. But I support Jews and Muslims in their religious freedom to circumcise infant males. So you do believe that "religious freedom" should trump bodily autonomy. A parent has a right to make a medically unnecessary decision about their child's body for an arbitrary reason like "religious freedom." You can practice religion without mutilation, and the right to practice religion shouldn't supercede someone's right to bodily autonomy, regardless of whether that person is …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/14 02:05 AM
8

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/25oeq2/textbook_warning_signs_of_an_abusive_relationship/ http://imgur.com/a/bGiiW http://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/1pj33b/hey_trp_trolls_before_you_whine_that_we_are_just/ http://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/1ko4yx/a_compilation_of_some_of_trps_finest_older/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/14 04:04 AM
4

Yeah, that would have merit if the "theory" were objectively verifiable and not created and perpetuated solely by the people who adhere to it. That's like saying you can't judge a cult by its leader, without the leader and followers the cult wouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 08:00 PM
6

The problem is you will never get an answer that satisfies you because it's relative to ones point of view. 50,000 people can subscribe to TRP and every single one of them will have a different idea of what TRP "really is." Wouldn't you say that TRP mods and ECs speak for TRP? After all, a minority of the users there are producing a majority of the content, especially the highly upvoted content. There are definitely TRP users that are much more well known than others, the vast majority of the 50…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 07:51 PM
9

So many terpers use the defence of "but that's not what TRP really is!!!" without presenting any examples to prove that TBPers are strawmanning. TBPers have posted literal albums and compilations of screenshots of TRPers being misogynistic, irrational, advocating abuse and rape, and using pseudoscience, I can link them to you if you'd like. Can you link me to a compilation of screenshots containing examples of the nonsexist, rational, positive subreddit that TRP supposedly really is?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 07:09 PM
11

another thing is abusive people generally don't appear abusive until it's already too late. This is huge, lots of victims of abuse start out feeling like they're met their soul mate because everything is so perfect, but this can actually be one of the first red flags -- referred to as "love bombing." Abusive relationships typically start on a high and slowly descend. The abuse is typically relatively harmless at first, and people usually just think they're through the honeymoon phase and will ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 06:59 PM
11

While I would say this woman shouldn't date this guy anymore, I don't think what he did was abuse Her boyfriend punched her in the face = physical abuse. Her boyfriend told her he could only stomach fucking her in the dark and many other nasty, hurtful things = verbal abuse. /u/TRPsubmitter singled out a paragraph of her post intentionally, because he wanted to take that paragraph out of context for his own purposes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 06:46 PM
35

I love how this guy doesn't actually believe she's a victim, he has to put it in scare quotes. He calls OP biased, but he's the one who cherrypicked a single paragraph in a long post where the OP states that she was physically and verbally abused by her BF and /u/TRPsubmitter is commending the abuser for "maintaining frame." Disgusting. And TRPers wonder why TRP is referred to as misogynistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 06:04 PM
7

Except that's not even close to what /u/MissCheesyPants said, so your example doesn't make any sense. He called her opinion radical when it's far from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 08:58 PM
12

This post is literally asking people to define what rape is to them, and you're bringing up the legal definition using that as a springboard to rant against "you radical feminists?" Way to miss the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 08:47 PM
4

Canola oil is actually called Rapeseed oil in many countries, it was changed to Canola in the US to avoid negative connotations.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 08:35 PM
1

I'd love to see where these supposed "empowered sluts" are telling everyone it's A-okay to get STDs, because this sounds a hell of a lot like a strawman to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 08:32 PM
-1

Choosing not to answer is just that, choosing not to answer. If someone wants to judge that person with a complete absence of evidence either way, that says more about them than it does about the person refusing to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 08:29 PM
1

Was she your first? If not, do you feel you've robbed her of something by not being able to give her your virginity they way she gave you hers? Are men "used" by women the same way women are "used" by men?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 08:27 PM
2

Hence all the jokes about repressed homosexuality directed at TRPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 08:25 PM
4

Or maybe it reflects how little or highly she thinks of it. Of what, her body? From the way you're wording things it just sounds like you're willing to make inappropriate judgments about a person based on their clothing, like assuming you can determine someone's views on sex based strictly on what they wear.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/14 12:39 AM
2

Clothing style is the expression of a person "soul". Maybe for some people, but certainly not for everyone. What one person may consider racy/sexy another person might consider totally banal. For example this outfit might be normal everyday wear for one woman, but dressy/date clothing to another woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 11:38 PM
9

I think two women could wear exactly the same outfit for completely different reasons, clothing as a form of communication is nebulous at best. People who make assumptions about others based strictly on what they're wearing are the ones with problems communicating, not the people they're judging.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 07:07 PM
4

I don't want to be looked at as "any given person" which is definitely one of the prerequisites for sleeping with me, my partner has to know who I am as a person. It would really bother me if a potential partner approached me having already made judgments about my sexuality, like the shame example in the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 07:01 PM
3

I think this sort of thing is fascinating, but believe it will have very little bearing on my life or the lives of anyone able to participate in this sub. I think my great great grandchildren would be lucky to experience the beginnings of the benefits of transhumanism, even that seems ambitious and optimistic. That's not to say I think technological advancements like these shouldn't be a priority, just that they're not worth considering personally or applying to modern society because the chance…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/14 03:44 AM
1

The ambiguity we have online is actually one of the reasons I think up/downvotes are beneficial. It's a way of filtering the quality posts from the shit ones. A number of people in reading this thread agreed with you about my tone, which is why that particular comment is downvoted to zero. I explained myself a bit more clearly further down the thread and that comment got upvoted to 4. I don't see why people have a problem with being up/downvoted, if a bunch of people don't like what I have to sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 11:44 PM
0

And that changing of the mind is what is wrong. You are putting your own in the moment hormonaly induced desires above the future developement of a human being and your own future. That might be your personal opinion, but everyone has the right to decide what to do with their own body and no one's preferences or desires take precedence over that right. It's no one's fault that reproductive biology is lopsided. A man's decision to consent to the possibility of parenthood is made before sex occurs…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 11:39 PM
1

I guess it depends on how you perceive my tone. I'm definitely being critical, but nowhere was I insulting. I also think my criticism was constructive, there are a ton of meta posts in this sub and nothing ever actually changes as a result of them. Even posts like these have an obvious angle, OP is mad that BP viewpoints were upvoted to the top in a "RP" designated thread. If he wants a particular viewpoint to be protected, he should stick to TRP or TBP. The whole point of this sub is that anyon…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 10:47 PM
1

Is it that unreasonable that given all the medical options at her disposal a pregnancy can be completely preventable? Yes it is. Even with a hormal IUD, the most effective form of birth control next to tubal ligation, it's possible for a woman to become pregnant. Abortion isn't birth control, and lots of women who think they'll get an abortion in the case of an unplanned pregnancy change their minds once they're actually pregnant. The only choice for a man who wants to be absolutely certain he d…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 10:37 PM
-2

I didn't ignore your points, I shared my feelings in my first comment and I actually commented on how the sub could be improved in a reply to you but it's clear you haven't absorbed what I've written, preferring to mock me instead by telling me to "let it all out" and accusing me of ranting.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 09:34 PM
1

You're still absolving the man of responsibility by believing it's possible for a woman to make a 100% guarantee about the outcome of sex, something she doesn't have full control over regardless of what preventative measures may be taken. I agree that if a woman is deceptive about getting pregnant a la "spermjacking" she's done something morally wrong, but that doesn't change the fact that the man allowed his sperm to be "jacked" in the first place. Unless he was raped, he made a choice to have …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 09:31 PM
5

So you believe that men shouldn't have to accept responsibility for their actions then? No birth control is guaranteed to work perfectly, every time a man cums inside a woman he should understand that there's an inherent risk of pregnancy because sex is for reproduction. It doesn't matter what the woman's intentions are because it takes two to tango. There's no such thing as "I willingly came inside you and you got pregnant, but it's not my responsibility because I didn't want to get you pregnan…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 09:09 PM
1

oooh let it allll out. This is exactly the type of unnecessary hostility I was talking about when I said most posts devolve into flame wars. Thanks for proving my point for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 09:02 PM
10

Why doesn't her father deserve to be shamed for impregnating her mother and then abandoning her? The fact that you're focusing solely on /u/MissPearl's mother instead of her parents as a unit is very telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 08:45 PM
5

I think there should be more quality posts, the way to increase this sub's popularity isn't to have multiple weekly posts bitching about the rules or lack thereof. This sub is a total shitshow, it needs a complete overhaul and effective moderation which seems highly unlikely considering the creator of the sub fucked off a long time ago and most of the other mods barely participate beyond deleting comments. Most the of the regulars here are firmly on one side or the other, they have no interest i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 08:40 PM
-1

I think meta posts should be banned. There's at least a couple a week cluttering up sub and nothing ever changes. PPD is what it is, there's intermittant moderation at best, what's the point of complaining about shit like this? If you don't like it, don't participate, but don't actually expect anything to change. There's a reason this sub only has 1800 participants while TRP and TBP have 10k+ each.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 08:30 PM
0

Is there a reason you're "calling me out" instead of contributing yourself..? If you want to increase the signal to noise ratio, try adding some quality content instead of being antagonistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 01:29 AM
3

It's sad that some of the commenters in here can't actually bring themselves to give the opposite sex anything more than a backhanded compliment. "Sex hole not filled with shit" and "hivemind on lockdown"??? Come on guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 02:12 PM
2

So you decided to be a dick and call her out while contributing absolutely nothing to the discussion? Helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 07:43 PM
3

Seriously, that's appalling, especially if the kids are the ones making the choice and not the parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 07:30 PM
10

Like any other social science, there are some people who will use it to prop up their preconceived notions and others who are genuinely trying to advance the field regardless of the outcome. Unfortunately the shittier evopsychologists tend to be more well known, like Satoshi Kanazawa, who has been renounced by his field but still has his ridiculous articles published in Psychology Today. That's another problem with pop-science in general: most people aren't scientifically literate, and those tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 02:06 PM
2

It's actually called a humblebrag, and that's not what she was doing anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 01:57 PM
7

Cringe...had the worst second hand embarrassment reading this :x
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 01:26 PM
1

Lol, there are tons of guys who get paid to jack it on camera, it's just other guys who are paying them to do it!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 01:22 PM
5

Nobody should be telling anybody what it's like to be anybody else. Men aren't a monolithic entity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 11:21 PM
6

Thanks for those credible facts! You said it, so it must be true. Also, are you under the impression that girls dont fap like crazy? Just because there's more of a social stigma attached to female masturbation than there is to male masturbation doesn't mean girls don't do it regularly, it's actually even easier for some women than it is for men, all you have to do is cross your legs and rub against the seam of your jeans if the mood strikes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 11:20 PM
3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_perspectives_on_tattooing Lots of religious people use tattoos as an expression of their religion. If parents are allowed to remove their child's foreskin as an expression of their religion why shouldn't they be allowed to alter the rest of his body as well? So, unless circumsicion is considered a crime That's exactly what I'm arguing, that circumcision should be a crime unless it's medically necessary. I really hope a precedent is set for criminalizing cir…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 10:59 PM
11

Men have a much higher sex drive then women because of testosterone. Men need sex. Sometimes they need it like a drug. Sometimes a man only wants sex. Source? Pretty sure the leader of AVEN is male. Just admit that you're talking about yourself and don't try to apply your personal feelings to an entire gender, it's sexist. Men as a group aren't slaves to their sex drives who will go through withdrawal shakes if their dick stays dry for too long and it's insulting to portray them this way by comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 10:52 PM
3

How is circumicizing a baby who has no concept of religion an expression of religious freedom? Do you believe that parents should be allowed to use their children's bodies as tools in their expression of religious beliefs? If that's the case, why can't parents tattoo their children or modify their children's bodies in other medically unneccessary ways?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 10:20 PM
3

Just because circumcision is practiced traditionally doesn't mean that it's right. I personally believe all people have the right to bodily autonomy. Parents are the safeguards of their child's wellbeing, but that doesn't mean they have the right to do as they'd like with their child's body for personal reasons like religion. Would you support female circumcision?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 10:17 PM
3

My point isn't that parents shouldn't be able to make medicial decisions for their children when their children are so young that they're incapable of having a voice in their own wellbeing, my point is that parents shouldn't be allowed to permanently modify their child's body for personal and not medical reasons. I definitely support a ban on elective circumcisions for minors.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 10:15 PM
11

tl;dr: he's racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:34 PM
4

Yeah, I wasn't trying to say any one religion requires FGM, just that there's a link between religion and FGM and providing the info for anyone interested. I believe every individual has the right to bodily autonomy, meaning that parents are to safeguard their child's health and well being until the child is capable of doing that themselves and that's it - no unnecessary body modifications until the child is capable of understanding bodily autonomy and consenting to medical procedures.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:26 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_on_female_genital_mutilation
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:14 PM
4

I have a feeling that being "normal" is what influenced my husband's decision-making process the most. That's the main problem I have with elective circumcision, the fact that it's more about the parents than the child. If you're going to raise a child with the concept of bodily autonomy, why would you violate that concept right off the bat by performing elective circumcision? If parents are allowed to make medically unnecessary modifications to their children's bodies, why teach the concept of …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:11 PM
9

You're American, right? In Denmark (and pretty much the whole of Europe) I have a feeling most pediatricians would certainly not recommend medically unnecessary circumcision. American culture has a really unhealthy attitude towards sex and reproduction in general, de facto circumcision is only part of the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 07:54 PM
4

Should religious freedom trump a person's right to bodily autonomy though? Would you support female circumcision in the name of religious freedom?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 07:42 PM
14

I think it should be banned as a routine elective procedure on infants. There are a few countries in Europe considering outlawing medically unnecessary circumcision which I fully support, even in the case of religious practices because the bodily autonomy of all people should be respected regardless of age or their family's culture/religion. I'm also against parents who pierce their baby's ears etc, any kind of medically unnecessary body modification the child is unable to consent to. I'm totall…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 07:33 PM
1

I think a lot of guys don't have the patience it takes to hold out and wait for a girl like me to express interest. I like to be the pursuer but I take a while before I know whether or not I really want someone sexually. Most men who are more focused on sex don't have the patience/inclination to be a genuine friend for a few months or commit to exclusivity with me before sex is on the table, which is why I've gotten good at being able to tell which guys are in it strictly for the possbility of s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 07:11 PM
1

You could've done it in a less hostile way. I'm interested in your perspective, but your tone came off as sarcastic/mocking in that comment especially and reading your thread with /u/DocileBanalBovine you don't really seem interested in considering other perspectives, just soapboxing for your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 07:06 PM
1

Seems like we're dealing with someone who's particularly dense when it comes to this subject matter. I have a feeling he's letting his personal experiences/emotions get in the way and it's preventing him from considering a perspective other than his own.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 07:01 PM
2

I want to be clear: he likes her for more than sex, but the sex thing gets in the way. This is a dealbreaker for a lot of people, including me. If a guy's sexual attraction gets in the way of everything else in a friendship, then the foundation of that friendship obviously isn't very strong. I want friendships (and relationships, which blossom out of friendships) that are founded in emotional intimacy and personal compatibility that transcends sexual attraction. Sex is fun and an important expre…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 06:58 PM
2

I didn't see this before but I don't expect guys to hit on me. I'm perfectly happy to pursue a man if I'm interested in him.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 06:46 PM
3

You're spot on, thanks for presenting my view! Showed up realll late to this thread haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 04:18 PM
1

That's totally fine, but it's a personal characteristic of yours that isn't universally applicable. For me, friendship is a prerequisite to a desire for sex. If I don't know who the person is "on the inside" then there's no way I'm going to want their dick inside me, regardless of what they look like. I can be attracted to someone without actually wanting to fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 04:08 PM
2

the more I like you as a person, the more sexually appealing you'll be. Exactly! So yeah, the friend thing isn't always a guise. I know, all my romantic relationships have started out as friendships for at least a few months before progressing to relationships. I have had experiences where guys have feigned interest in who I am as a person in the hopes of getting laid though. I said in one of my first comments here that once I got some experience with the kind of behavior guys who are looking fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 04:03 PM
1

I don't know what point you're trying to make other than disagreeing with a hostile tone. All I was doing was sharing my personal thoughts on the subject, if you don't have anything constructive to say don't bother responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 03:57 PM
1

I was being brief, obviously there's a happy median where I get to know someone who's genuinely interested in who I am as a person and not just the prospect of fucking me. Like I said in one of my other comments once it happens a few times you get to know the behavior of a guy who's simply interested in sex. I also approach people I'm attracted to in a respectful and direct way.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 03:56 PM
5

WTF this is freaky, I have the exact same experience! I was single for a while and when I first started dating my BF I couldn't figure out what exactly had changed that made me so happy and comfortable when I was out with him, just figured we ignored the world together. It took us being separated when he was traveling for me to finally get it, I noticed the catcalls, stares, people telling me to smile etc came back when I went out alone or with a girlfriend. I brought this up to him and he said …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 08:41 PM
7

I personally agree with that, but I identify as demisexual and have to be emotionally invested in a person before I become interested in them sexually. I think there are plenty of women out there with sexualities that differ from my own and would be able to tell on sight whether or not she was interested in a man, I know lots of women who enjoy casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 08:26 PM
11

Either that or they tend to get a "first dibs" head state, that this time as your friend is an investment such that if your actual choice of partner walks under a bus- pow! They expect to be upgraded and when you pick an unrelated person rather than them, you deal with mystery butt hurt. This is the weirdest thing in my experience. I had someone who did exactly that to me. He fully accepted that we would never date, had a GF and everything, but once I got a serious BF poof 5+ year friendship ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 08:05 PM
5

I'm not open to being hit on by strangers, I make that clear using body language and immediate rejection if the guy is forward enough to approach me anyways. I also don't go to bars and clubs or anywhere else like that unless it's for a specific purpose (like a show or something) and then I'm usually with a decent sized group. I'd rather reject a casual acquaintance like a classmate or a colleague for example than have an acquaintance go through the trouble of trying to befriend me despite only …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 07:56 PM
9

It's a little funny so many "sex positive" people that I hear this kind of rhetoric from have a real problem with guys who want sex (even if it's under the pretense of friendship). I consider myself sex-positive and I don't have any problem with guys who are interested in a girl purely for sex, as long as they know how to handle rejection well if the girl's not interested. I would much rather have a guy express sexual interest in me in a direct, respectful way than dancing around it trying to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 06:41 PM
2

One of my best friends (we grew up together, he even had a GF) "dumped" me when he found out I was in a serious relationship. Shit like that is not a one way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 02:52 PM
18

I've had "friendships" develop with guys that are dropped the second I make it clear I'm not attracted to them. Once this happens a few times, you can start to tell who actually wants to be your friend and who's just trying to be friendly before they escalate to flirty. If I think a guy is being disingenuous with his friendship I make it known as soon as possible that I'm only interested in him platonically. This makes some guys feel prematurely rejected ("you didn't even give me a chance!") and…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/14 02:10 PM
5

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/1r1zw0/how_to_be_a_sex_god_1dont_bother_actually_being/[1] (dont want to actually link to the PUA site) Rule #1 – Her perception of your value is more important than your technique Rule #2 – Domination is the biggest turn on Rule #3 – Please yourself above pleasing her Rule #4 – Have full control of your touch http://www.rooshv.com/the-female-orgasm-is-trivial A female orgasm is... pointless. Pointless in the sense that there's no purpose for it. Sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/14 03:39 PM
17

I studied abroad in Italy and my mother has some family friends there. Italian men typically live with their mothers until they marry and then expect their wives to take on a distinctly Italian mother-wife role. If a woman accepts this role and takes care of all the domestic duties in addition to working full time, her husband is kid #1 and the actual firstborn is kid #2 so it's no wonder Italian women aren't interested in big families any more, the workload would be overwhelming.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/14 02:34 AM
1

Ah, so uncommonly attractive people want to be with other ridiculously goodlooking people? What a revelation, that has nothing to do with your actual post though which was body shaming. But thanks to the mods your post got removed so I'm pretty sure this thread's finished, toodles!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:59 PM
2

Read his other replies, he's not even trying to be rational. Apparently guys with physical flaws aren't applicable to the same logic in reverse, they can "make up for it."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:42 PM
2

So it's possible for a man to make up for his physical flaws and attract a worthy mate but no self respecting man would touch a woman who's had a baby? a fit natural bod So SMV is largely based on luck. Not everyone is born hot and it's a lot easier for some peope to maintain fitness than it is for others, not to mention how subjective attractiveness is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:40 PM
2

It's not about moms. It's about your twisted idea of what makes a man a man. I noticed that you didn't touch on men with saggy skin and stretch marks either. What if a guy lost a ton of weight and had stretch marks and scars from getting skin removed? He could never be alpha and attract a fuckable woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:24 PM
2

Gag. Don't talk down to me with that condescending honey-sweetheart bullshit. Go away, you're not contributing anything at all to this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:16 PM
1

I'm in the "high SMV" point of my life according to TRP. I have stretch marks on my hips, inner thighs and boobs similar to a lot of the women in pics you've posted and I have absolutely no problem finding attractive guys who are interested in me - actually they'd have to bail after my clothes came off if they wanted to "respect themselves" like you wrote. I've never even had a baby and I'm not overweight, puberty just wasn't kind to me: I grew almost 5 inches and sprouted hips and tits in a rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/14 03:05 PM
22

Take my opinion personally if you want to, but two different people in this thread have already posted a source that proves how uncommon relationships with a large age difference actually are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/14 10:17 PM
19

I think a lot of TRPers defend inappropriate age gaps in relationships because it supports other ideas that TRP perpetuates, like "SMV." If a guy who's 30+ is supposedly at his peak SMV, TRP says it only makes sense that he would date someone who is also at their peak SMV, and according to TRP women peak in their late teens - early 20s so SMV 'match ups' are probably going to involve a pretty big age difference. They're really not taking into account the fact that most young women (I'm one too! …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/14 09:25 PM
4

I mostly lurk but I often hit the report button when I see a comment that's out of line and I've found the mods to be highly responsive the majority of the time. I haven't found them to be biased, if anything they're relaxed about which comments get deleted and if the comment is in a gray area it tends to stay up more often than not. I think we should have clearer rules or guidelines about posting. It feels like a solid chunk of the posts here are meta posts or weak discussion posts which are bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 02:25 AM
1

Look I get that you don't think it's mechanical, but that's what he's criticizing- getting EVC for each new sex act. Who? If you don't dispute that you favor it then there's not much to talk about, Favor what? EVC? This is a debate subreddit, so there's likely even more to talk about if we disagree. it shows that the idea is hardly dismissed or the sole domain of tumblrites. The idea of EVC? Why would you think the idea of sleeping with a consenting partner is niche? There are also nonverbal way…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/14 06:32 AM
1

Your writing is vague so it's difficult for me to follow you. Criticizing EVC for each new sex act is sex-negative, why would anyone oppose the notion that people should only be sleeping with partners who actually want them?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/14 06:21 AM
2

Did you know that when you google the term ALL the sites that pop up advocate that- getting consent for each new sex act? There's about six million hits for 'enthusiastic consent' and not even all of them on the first page advocate for consent for each new sex act, and that's not a bad idea anyways. If a girl was into PiV sex would you automatically assume she was also up for anal? Of course not, yes doesn't mean anything goes. Yesmeansyes dot com explicitly recommends it through a comic they li…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/14 05:57 AM
9

You're misunderstanding enthusiastic consent if that's what you think the majority of the people who use the term are advocating. Google the term and you'll find a more polite summation of what /u/myfriendscantknow said. I like this image a lot because it has a variety of examples of how to communicate with a partner in a way that ensures the consent of both parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/14 08:21 PM
5

Everyone sounds American on the internet because the dominant language on the western internet is English and the dominant pop culture is American. If you spend decades online, more than likely your writing style will resemble American English.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/14 04:27 PM
13

Lol, head on over to /r/redpillwomen and see the kind of women TRP attracts when all the cards are on the table. PUA/RP type techniques might be 'effective' on a variety of women IRL, but that's because of the limited information those women receive in a given social situation. Manipulation is the whole point of many PUA tactics. The women who participate in RPW are fully aware of what TRP advocates and still aren't turned off by it, and here's the kind of content they produce: On the nature of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/14 04:03 PM
1

To me this seems skeevy on both the father's and his girlfriend's part. The fact that this man sexualizes people in the same age bracket as his daughter is disturbing enough on its own to many people, but adding the fact that he wouldn't have met his girlfriend if they didn't have his daughter in common ups the ickiness factor because it's making different social boundaries bleed together. It's one thing for a man to be interested in younger women, but fathers don't belong participating in the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 10:45 PM
6

So it's natural for a woman to submit to a man, but unnatural for a man to submit to a woman? There's a 'dynamic' all heterosexual couples must share or else they're doing it wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/14 09:56 PM
2

Been together since early 2012, met online and quickly escalated to meatspace so our 'courtship' didn't last long :3 Both of us find core RP views abhorrent. We're in a healthy and happy hetero, monogamous, age-appropriate relationship. It's been two years and we've never had even a minor fight. We're moving in together next month, can't wait to be with my man!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 10:00 PM
5

I would, especially the older partner. Regardless of gender, if you want to date someone who belongs to your children's generation, you've got some serious psychological shit to sort through.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/14 12:02 AM
5

TL;DR version of the mod's reasoning
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/14 10:25 AM
2

anddd there's the appearance of the isms you're so famous for. A rich white guy would never beat his wife!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/14 02:45 PM
4

The entire point of TBP is to mock TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/13 12:39 PM
3

I'm sure Roosh would acknowledge that promiscuity is a trait found in both men and women. The distinction he's making when he uses the term slut is one of social value. People like Roosh believe that promiscuity increases a male's value while simultaneously being degrading to a female's value. The source of the forced polarization of one trait's social value among the sexes is that some people view sex as an exchange of power instead of as a pleasurable act of social bonding two people do togeth…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/13 12:33 AM
7

Here are a few examples of billionaire's wives/exes: Steve Job's wife Laurene Powell Bill Gate's wife Melinda Warren Buffett's wife Astrid Menks and his former wife Susan Buffett. None of these women look like super models and they've all had meaningful relationships with the richest and most powerful men in the western world. NABillionairesALT?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/13 07:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter