TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

finebalance Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by finebalance on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Im fine with her saying that. What pisses me off is she will say that in one breath but would be okay with sending her son to war. Yeah. Most parents are completely okay with their children going to war, as long as its their sons, mothers' especially
/r/MensRights13/05/16 06:35 AM
1

Okay, two things: using obviously mentally ill people isn't evidence of anything, except for the fact that they are mentally ill. By doing this, you fail to make your point - we all know what that is - and come off as incredibly insensitive. Secondly, the point you're trying to make is that women can be violent, just like men, in ways both mundane and exceptional, and that society tends to forgive violence perpetrated by them, or at least not persecute it as harshly. Fair enough. So make that. T…
/r/MensRights09/05/16 10:16 AM
2

But as /u/altmehere eloquently notes, using the 'less serious' argument as the basis of being worse-off than their male counterparts is at best a double-edged sword.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 02:41 PM
12

Fair enough. If our interest is primarily in the present, what sort of issues do lesbians face, specific to their sexual orientation, that are not faced by gay men? (Not a rhetorical question.)
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:26 AM
128

coalition of British student-activists... Says Gay Men Not Oppressed Enough to Deserve Representation "Fuck you," says Alan Turing.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:06 AM
22

It means that she came first amongst her batch in whichever university & program she studied in. Considering that there are plenty of really, really shitty universities in this country, it could imply anything from 'meh' to 'pretty fuckin' smart'.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 07:58 PM
3

Kind of self defeating. If enough people are discriminatory, rude, inconsiderate or prejudiced, then they are tacitly setting up a social system of oppression. And since in general human beings are bastards, telling people people that being discriminatory, rude, inconsiderate or prejudiced against this particular group doesn't really count, then that is exactly what they will do (and in many communities are already doing.)
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:22 PM
-5

Barriers for CS are higher for man than for woman? Are you serious?
/r/MensRights14/02/16 04:00 PM
-5

Actually, that is very possible. You see this in many areas where the barriers to one gender (legal or social) are higher than those for the other. Of the gender that has more difficulty getting in, usually higher quality candidates get through. Hence, the average female candidate can be better than the average male one.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 02:27 PM
7

Oh, sorry. Misread your comment completely.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:49 PM
-6

What? Clinton is a creationist? Sources please.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:26 PM
-1

I couldn't get much info on it via a cursory google search, but this I think is a largely US-only problem (amongst the developed nations, at least) arising due to stupid policies and regressive cultural attitudes towards abortion. Whether you contest the existence of rape culture or not, "dumpster babies" aren't in any way connected to it. ie. Your headline is weird.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:40 AM
1

Also, your math looks fishy to me. It seems to me that you're not very likely to get raped when you're 80, or 60, or 1. Let probability of being raped in one year be R = 0.02% thus, R = 0.00002 not R = 0.9998 0.02% = 0.02/100 = 0.0002 Thus R = 1 - 0.0002 = .9998 Check your digits. Secondly, about the fishy math, I explicitly spelled it out that I'm making a strong assumption here. In fact, at the end of my post, I give figures for 30 constant years.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:17 AM
5

You need to apply these numbers over a lifetime. Assuming that your 0.02% is true, and further assuming two things: that the probability is constant across lifetime (80 years) and that everybody is at equal isn't, what you get is: Lifetime probability of not being raped (0.02%): (.9998)80 -> 98.41% With 0.06, that probability is 95.31%. Ie. 4.69% of being raped over your lifetime. This isn't a small number. Considering that your figures were for actual and completed rape, it's actually pretty hi…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:45 AM
2

Oh look, there's gold under the dirt. I'm rich now. Well hey, I helped you with that! If she signed a contract giving away rights to produce and monetize the video, then she gave those rights away. If not, she might have a claim. Er, no. That's really not how it works. Haven't you seen all those agreements that say something is free for 'personal' but not commercial use? This is very, very similar. Of course, in the end it depends upon the initial agreement. If it sneaked in stuff about monetizi…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:04 PM
1

Well, depending upon the wordings of the agreement, that is a perfectly valid claim.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:02 PM
-5

We walked in, in the middle of her quitting her job mid shift. She was yelling at a different manager than the one who hit her and was throwing some bags of chips on the ground, threatening to turn up in this bitch, etc. Really nothing I haven’t seen before or wouldn’t expect from someone who has to work at a fucking Panera all day. Then out of nowhere white shirt manager approaches her and immediately gets physical with her, keep in mind she’s about 5’2 at most and he was bigger than me... He l…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:49 PM
7

Friends! Put a signature! In its place could be any, and if we close our eyes to this incident, then after some time, students will be able to put any loving woman, in which our society so desperately needs. I have absolutely no clue what the bolded bit is saying. This has to be satire of some sort. Maybe the petition's creator wanted to see how many people will be lured to sign simply because of the teacher sex angle, or something?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:35 AM
16

Very good point. It would be much harder to overturn a conviction where physical evidence didn't provide a clear basis for innocence (or guilt).
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:52 PM
5

All Modern art is essentially one long, slightly incoherent, conversation. It absolutely does not exist in and of itself.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 03:14 PM
6

I know his child isn't biologically his. What? How is that fact common knowledge? And, if it is common knowledge, why does he have to pay for the kid?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 05:53 PM
3

Oh come on. Far greater than 1% of children suffer cause their fathers are assholes. People are not necessarily perfect, you know. And many are downright reckless. It's really not new.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:32 PM
2

$40 for men. 'Sister' walkers $25. Camaraderie for women; extra charge for men.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:57 PM
20

Women should get bigger bathroom because needs, but god forbid men take up more space on public transport.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:05 AM
1

It's very easy to get. If you've done high school chem well, many acids are also easy to make. (At least with materials one can readily procure in India.) A journalist friend I know was talking about how people can often get acid from industrial areas, bribing plant workers to procure acidic industrial waste.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:35 PM
1

Yes, yes it is.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 08:08 AM
7

But such is the marginalisation of Muslims that they are not given the benefit of being individuals... He may have made it about religion, but the operative word here is "he", and not "religion." Irony abounds. Hell, it gallops.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 11:35 AM
10

Under that law about misrepresenting yourself to your sexual partner, this, I guess, would count as rape. Honestly, I feel pretty bad for the both of them. Being from the same culture, I can totally empathize with why she would feel the need to lie, and why he would be so searingly hurt by these lies. You guys have a reasonable to high degree of sexual freedom from your early teenage years, so you don't really get how amazing it can be when compared to the kind of attitudes we are straight-jacke…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 08:57 PM
2

Just because you aren't actively enslaving people in third world countries, doesn't mean you're not benefiting from first-world privilege in a substantial way (given to you mostly by white men).
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:50 AM
1

How could you possibly prove or disprove this if an ex or ex-sexual partner decides to get vindictive?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:35 AM
1

That really sucks. Is there a coherent mainstream feminist argument in support of these kinds of bans, or do we only see support for it at the fringes? I just goggled Jezebel and paternity testing, and the first article was critiquing another lady that stated that paternity testing is anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 02:20 PM
1

That's so weird. Are there any prerequsites required for the courts to fulfill that request? Under what conditions would they deny it?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:10 PM
10

You're right and the analogy, as somebody pointed out in a higher rated comment, does break down pretty violently when you interrogate it. He is no way deserves what he's getting, and the reaction is way too hysterical, but I have no idea how he thought this was a good idea either (nor how anybody else in that team didn't point it out that the Emperor was wearing a pretty shitty shirt).
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:27 PM
1

Isn't calling out on other men doing stupid things one of the points of this sub? Being assholish after getting online rejected is pretty dumb - one doesn't really expect a lot of civility online, and mostly one doesn't get it. If I had a laundry list of people doing that to me, I might just post that stuff online to, just for laughs. Sadly, I just got the two.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/14 05:22 PM
3

Da fuck? If this is truth you were molested and abused and... I really hope you've sought some sort of help for it, with a good friend and confidant, if not professional.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 12:55 AM
10

Come on, call a spade a spade: most of those replies were pretty assholish. Somebody does that to me (and somebody has) I would definitely be okay with posting that stuff publically if I wanted to get some sort of revenge. Additionally, her fatness has no real bearing here: even if a pretty girl rejects a person, many guys don't take it well (for various reasons) and lash out. This is however a good example of what not to do: one needs to take things in stride because, as an old, racist as fuck …
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 07:05 PM
6

"Not all those who disagree with you are evil or stupid." A lot of people would be well served if they understand this one basic idea. (And, well, th e interlinked web of ideas that feed into it.)
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:18 PM
1

The newest book by pretty much the only writer the average Indian reads is titled "Half-Girlfriend." Go read the synonyms if you have time. It's hilarious. (Although, the guy does get the girl in the end - of course, because otherwise the millions of blueballed guys that buy this book would have no reason to read it.)
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 11:28 AM
1

I agree. Some women do this, just as some men do as much as they can get away with. It's kind of human nature to be an asshole. However, laughing, I can assure you, isn't indicative of a lack of self-respect. I've been a similar situation where I've had to just stand there and take it, and try to protect the many many valuables of mine littered around the place. Restraining the aggressor can be hard because if they struggle, they'll can get bruises. Pushing them away from you is an iffy proposit…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 02:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter