TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

firex726 Archive

View 4 posts and 1,596 comments by firex726 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,596 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Seems Canadian feminists are having quite the bad time of late; what with the HBB lawsuit also moving forward.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:53 PM
–

Many of their writers have been very pro-free speech of late.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:39 AM
–

According to this article, it's not even that there is a gap in publishing but also reviewing. So basically more men submit material then women, and then more men get published.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:43 PM
4

Yea, women getting such favors is the reason why they can be seen as not being up to the task to begin with. Before it was a woman getting a promotion being met with "Who did she sleep with?" to now giving them more gender based favoritism. Now when she gets a promotion she wont even be thought to have done the work of sleeping with someone but rather just being born correctly.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:37 PM
10

Yep, every time someone starts a campaign to put up these posters, we see women who identify as Feminists going around to tear them down. But don't you dare call into question their 1 in 4 stat.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:36 AM
–

Steve or TL;DR? TL;DR, is pretty good about responding to critics who have a cogent argument against him.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:51 PM
6

Green moose? Teal Dear, a play on how TL;DR sounds.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 07:50 PM
18

A little longer then usual, but TL;DR does a great job deconstructing most of the common bullshit claimed regarding the MRM.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 11:46 AM
–

And only becuase of the Bible. We've been uncovering finds for decades which contradict the Biblical account. From the builders being buried in honorable ways, which sales would not have been, to the Egyptian paying local and foreign laborers for the work, which is corroborated by neighboring nations. Also note that the common cited Exodus account is not a couple dozen people; we're talking about a nation of around 2 million people, plus livestock and supplies. And yet no one saw fit to write do…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 11:36 AM
1

Yes, they have access to acid now.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:44 PM
–

Well according to OP it was useful information that countered a preconceived notion; so you are just stright up whining.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:20 PM
–

Found the whiney theist...
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:34 PM
-1

Might I suggest The Bible Reloaded for a good starting point and their Bible Study series.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:35 AM
–

Ummm... Just fyi there is no evidence outside the Bible to support that claim of slavery.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 02:35 AM
5

That shirt alone should belong in the cringe subs.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:40 AM
23

Even that example is poor. If you report a rape, they will still do a rape kit and take down your information. It's only when you start accusing someone that they start wanting hard evidence. With the purse, it'd be more like you pointed at some random person and accused them of stealing the purse.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 11:59 PM
–

Well in the current run; shes borderline apathetic towards humans while Clark is his usual Good Ol' Boy self.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 12:24 AM
1

Could be just due to age, that post was already 6 hours old when it got linked so likely aged off their first page listing.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:24 PM
–

Also $500k is not THAT much for a business. I work in an office/retail setting with insane markup; and it's considered a low year if we only do $1m in sales that year. Just in terms of operating costs, not counting personnel $500k won't cover a whole heck of a lot.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:47 AM
1

Ain't it funny how in a world with pervasive rape culture every example of it keeps conning up false. One would think it'd be much easier finding examples.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:43 PM
–

I really like this series, but god damned that image.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:20 PM
1

woot! Karen, you responded to me, too bad it was meant for someone else :(
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:23 AM
–

How does that matter? You're still comparing someone feeling uncomfortable with a person being groped or pressured into sex. Go ahead and describe whatever hypothetical you like, it'll still be legal, and it still wont be sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:19 AM
–

So... making you feel uncomfortable is the same as groping? This might be a shock, but when you're in a public area, being looked at is permissible. Maybe not socially acceptable but short of a physical or verbal assault someone is well within their rights to look at others.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:47 AM
3

Also am curious how they plan to provide evidence of such claims... The opponents should support this then blanket accuse every supporter of it.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:45 AM
2

Anyone who supports a zero tolerance policy at a university needs to be expelled. ZT policies are meant to appeal to people with little to no critical thinking skills, and if the students support it they are missing the point of higher education.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:44 AM
–

under false pretences Allison has admitted to initially signing up as a comic booth, but later decided to make it about the HBB; which she has released evidence of in her videos. She contacted the proper people after trying to submit the request online and was told it'd be handled. Also of note, the comic reference was on display at the booth, and each of the main members of the HBB are credited in it. own crowdfunder You mean where they talk about infiltrating the world of gaming... by in the v…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:39 AM
–

It's funny how this gap is so pervasive and common and yet every story we hear of it turns out false. You'd think it'd be far easier to find specific and verifiable examples of this problem.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:16 PM
–

Reddit's Interim CEO, claimed discrimination from previous employer based on gender, got hired on at Reddit by last CEO. Sued old employer for the exact amount her gay husband has been found to have defrauded investors. Lost her case on every count and now has to pay both her's and her old employers attorneys fees.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:19 AM
2

Wasn't there a South Park of this sort of situation?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:27 AM
–

It's funny, gender is the only thing that whine about for being these "discriminatory categories", it's just a name to identify a "thing" in our world. It's like saying Caucasian is also discriminatory.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:46 AM
13

No, I'm pretty sure she wanted to win, what with asking for the exact amount needed for her husband to stay out of prison, and also had she won even one of her four points would have KP paying legal fees; of which he now is responsible for. so now her husband owes $144m for fraud, and she owes years of legal fees to her lawyers.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:09 AM
5

They've actually become something of a bastion for social/progressive rights.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:08 AM
3

Which it's been making the rounds in the MSM as being a win for her, and proving her point; even though she lost.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:07 AM
20

And she was asking for almost the exact amount her also litigious husband was being sued for after a failed pyramid scheme. Not almost, the exact. He owes $144m. Punitive damages are capped at 9x the damage amount. She asked for $16m Maximum punitive would put it at $144m.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:06 AM
2

YES; next question...
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:32 PM
-2

olympic athlete/strongman Actually those terms have very specific meanings and have governing bodies which regulate them respectively.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:35 PM
-2

Well you're missing the point. The point is WHO appointed you the arbiter of what is and is not a gamer?
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:00 PM
12

It's also interesting that they now are wanting to impose requirements to consider oneself a gamer. Seems now even if you play but are bad at games, you're not a gamer.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:41 PM
1

Some schools will want you to go to them before the police. Faster response, etc... It's at best bullshit however you cut it though.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 10:21 PM
2

are women's studies majors who want free, high paying, cushy office jobs in a successful field that they didn't pursue. Or like a year ago, these same types were whining about Giantbomb hiring a stright white cis male to replace a member who moved. When asked if they had applied to the job the complainer said she never did. Talk about fucking entitlement.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 04:34 AM
19

Pretty sure fucking with people's food is a stright up crime. It's not uncommon for people who have been found to be contaminating customers food to also face criminal charges.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:04 AM
3

Exactly, this Standard of Living only applies to divorced couples. BUt for a married one then both them and the kid are SOL.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:17 AM
13

YEa, no where else does a private party get to be sole investigator of such acts. If I was accused of raping a coworkers on company property they'd call the police and let them run with it. And if they fired me, despite the police saying it was unfounded; I'd have a field day in court. Meanwhile in schools, not only do they get to investigate themselves, but even with a contradictory finding by a greater authority they can still take action which causes me direct harm.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:24 PM
3

They also need to pay for that jury too, which is why you only hear about it in large damage cases. No court is going to bother entertaining a jury over a $200 traffic ticket.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:21 PM
28

Also of note, getting expelled makes those loans become due instantly, so you need to then start paying on them, without a degree and now after having you name drug through the mud which any employer will easily see in a search. AND... many live in the dorms which means they are now homeless; which if you're accuser also lives in the same dorm building, even at the accusation you're required to be removed. Getting accused of rape in a university is one of the worst legal troubles you can face. A…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:20 PM
3

I am curious about the legal argument used to convince the judge. From mu limited Googling it seems while maybe not legally required it's expected to obtain both parents consent for a medical procedure before proceeding on something with long lasting effects. Could a spiteful spouse just fuck over their child to attack the more caring parent, just by giving consent to undergo some procedure?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:32 AM
2

Or it may be that only those 5% were ones with evidence and suspects to prosecute. You may be date raped but then have no idea who might have committed it, so of course it wont be prosecuted as they have no idea who to go after.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:50 AM
32

Yea. By their reading a woman should have to get permission for an abortion or hysterectomy.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 05:25 PM
36

Which even then get thrown out during the divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 09:27 PM
62

"Service guarantees citizenship!"
/r/MensRights24/12/14 12:26 AM
7

Also consider, Congo; UN has named it the rape capital of the world, with between 12%-22% of the women being raped/sexually assaulted; so these Feminists are claiming that the rape on US college campuses is so bad, it's beating the rape capitol of the world. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8650112.stm http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/12/48-women-raped-hour-congo
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:06 PM
2

Exactly, she does not want it to stop, she has a personal stake in making sure it continues or escalates, since it'll mean more sympathy money for her.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:31 PM
5

And when the exact same thing happens to a man will you say: "Oh an Feminist failing to condemn threats of violence towards men, par for the course really..." Troll internet comments are effectively a part of internet life, anyone with even a modicum of fame will receive them for the most mundane. They're done in the hope that the target will over react like Anita has which only incentives the trolls further. They go for whatever is the most basic and low hanging fruit, which is usually a matter…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 04:28 PM
6

It's also surprising how the rate of rape seems to be higher in American Universities then in what the UN calls the rape capital of the world, Congo. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8650112.stm http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/12/48-women-raped-hour-congo
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:53 AM
18

Of which none have been found to be credible, and some have been provably fabricated several times. Any even mildly public figure will get such comments online, it's like "death, taxes, and troll internet comments". Not only that but she claims that much of the harassment shes received is actual constructive criticism of her message. If you say something provable false, and someone calls you out on it being false; that's not harassment.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:48 AM
6

Everyone who touched this article needs to be fired. Purposely not contacting sources for the other side of the story, or doing any background research shows a compete lack of journalistic ethics. How could anyone have faith in that reporter or editors when it could expose the outlet to libel suits?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 09:10 AM
2

It was a study in that they had students divided by gender lines write a "game" and the girls made a more complex one. The requires more the game though were left wide open, so one might argue that the boys were better since they kept their simpler, as any half decent programmer will attest. Or that the girls were better for getting more practical use and practice of coding, etc...
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:13 AM
3

And I am getting they want to judge an individual for the actions of a group. Maybe we should lock up all those black people too, since they are convicted of more crimes then other races... oh wait, that's fucking racist.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:18 AM
10

Even better... In France there was an effort to mandate that private companies have a % of their boards be female. As in fuck being free to run your business as you want, or what is in it's best interest, you have to have this woman be on your board even though there were better candidates.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 08:42 PM
1

Well also considering what she and others have been through, a few mean comments on the internet would not even be a blip on her radar for harassment. It's mainly these silver spoon kids who seem so hurt by the comments, becuase they never experienced anything worse.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:21 PM
2

IT's like we've seen with Atheist conventions. Instead of trying to promote them and get more women interested; these types of people will instead draw up these long and convoluted policies to cover seemingly every single possible case of female/male interaction which ends up turning off more women since it makes it seem like there is some harassment problem.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:23 AM
4

When women do it, it's because of patriarchy and they are breaking out of it and empowering themselves against the patriarchy. Unless they enjoy their own sexuality in which case it's a bad thing again.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:49 PM
1

But then they have to draw a line at what is and is not a woman. Is it someone who identifies as one mentally? Is it a matter of just not having a penis? What about a woman who favors being butch and can be taken for a man?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 03:00 PM
1

Wasn't there actually an article like this? I believe there have been multiple ones, dating back to the early 1900's. Of women masquerading as men and seeing that the grass is not always greener.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:58 PM
10

slander libel, since it's written.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:34 PM
2

Also would not help if she had even the slightest bit of alcohol.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:41 PM
6

Or... maybe not insult him with that swirl.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:39 AM
13

no correlation between games and violence. Therein lies the kicker... If you agree with such proponents then you'd be in the same boat with Jack Thompson. Dead or Alive Beach Volleyball did not make teenage boys like chicks with big tits in swimsuits, there was already a market for that.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:43 AM
8

TIL Thunderf00t is really named Dr. Phil Mason, sounds like a crime detective.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:36 AM
10

Yep, I just dont get it. So it's an example of actual oppression women faced in the past, so they will continue doing exactly what they oppose? The woman is by nature entirely unable to decide the sex of a child. So let's blame her for having a male child and letting down Feminism? Also third in line? As if anything would ever really happen to William and Harry; they are some of the most protected people in the world.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 06:27 AM
3

Also does not come into play when the parents are still married. Both parents lose their jobs and are homeless? Sucks to be that kid. But the moment they divorce it's entirely the responsibility of the man to maintain the lifestyle the child is accustomed to.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:24 AM
32

They're like South Park in that regards, equal opportunity offenders. If anything they are about as egalitarian as you can get.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:26 PM
4

Since most western counties have militaries engaged in fighting in some part of the world, they are welcome to volunteer and suffer PTSD.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 10:02 PM
6

Except they dont want civil argument, even if offered, becuase they know they dont have a leg to stand on for their potions. They want sound bites that can be easily repeated and quoted.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:05 AM
4

Yea, they're actively trying to censor a differing ideas at a university. Do they think that Academia has been some kind of homogeneous forum with no conflict or dissent throughout it's history?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:01 AM
6

It's like how some religions will count people as part of their membership, becuase three generations ago a twice removed cousin was part of it.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:01 AM
1

But there is a difference between what people think and what actually happens. The false rape/not believe keeps getting repeated, but there is not one shred of actual evidence to support it.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:53 PM
1

That was my point, the only time she has ever responded to criticism, was the time she got called out for her BS video on Bayonetta and took it down.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:54 PM
1

The closest shes come to a response, is when being called out on her Bayonetta video, she took it down.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:25 PM
10

possibly biased bureaucrats. Not just possibly, there have been a few documented instances where people on the deciding board were friends or romantically involved with the accuser. A girl cheats or is raped, and her BF get's to decide what happens to the guy who did it. No conflict of interest there!
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:34 AM
3

Admins will do what is called Shadowbanning, where they effectively make a user invisible. So the user can still post and make submissions but no one else (save for mods who care enough to go looking) can see them. It's to mess with spammers but seems all too often used against users who engage in brigading or cross sub drama. Pretty much any instance of visiting a sub via another one and voting or commenting will be grounds to ban you; even though the site itself is based around sharing links.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:26 AM
3

Also of note, its a crime to file any kind of false police report, yet I dont see people not reporting assaults, burglaries, etc... when they have the same kind of consequences.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:05 PM
1

I wonder if it'd be victim blaming, if I got mugged late at night in a troubled neighborhood with me flashing a wad of cash and valuable jewelry.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:48 AM
18

Exactly; they do not have trained crime scene personnel to collect material, they dont have medical staff to evaluate victims and collect samples, they dont have investigators who can access restricted material and interview people, they dont have anything even resembling a fair judicial system. If I'm accused of doing drugs, my employer does not take me in back to do a drug test; they send me to an independently accredited lab to do it. If they fire me and I come back clean, LAWSUIT.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:46 AM
2

Read carefully, that is NOT the hate group list; if you'll notice Reddit MR is on there too. They never added Reddit or AVfM.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:53 PM
6

Registered by the "southern poverty law center" This is actually 100% entirely false, shortly after the news was announced the SPLC themselves came out and said neither MR nor /r/MR are registered. All they said were that there were a few bad apples and that's true of any group. http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-mens-rights-hate-group-splc/ "It's false. We wrote about the subreddit Mens Rights, but we did not list it as a hate group . . . "In almost all cases, we list hate groups at the end of…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:58 AM
13

So... This is the same Duke University that just got major media attention for the Lacrosse accusation and is now being sued by them? One would think they would be extra careful about any such accusations.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:48 PM
3

As I recall, the police did not peruse the matter; so either he did not, or there was not enough evidence.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:12 AM
5

Well realistically, the faultiness of condoms is more due to their usage.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:51 PM
2

Yea, you see the same thing in gaming. Often times for guys with cams, it'll be set for their neck or collar; but for many women it's always pulled out a bit more to get some cleavage in the shot and have alazon wish list links. DOn't recall who, but I think it was TB on the co-optional recently that commented on it.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:13 PM
5

But god forbid a man choose to not accept part of his gender role.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:10 PM
4

Yea, the claim is completely false by the SPLC themselves. Just another lie that gets repeated.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:27 AM
10

Hey man, use a trigger warning next time, some of us are traumatized by math references.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:11 AM
3

And we call that being a vignali which in any other instance would be a crime, but for w/e reason when it comes to rape on a campus they get to slide; we even now have Universities telling students NOT to report such crimes to the police but to go to the campus police.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 05:27 AM
20

Exactly, it's just a bunch of private people going vigilante on n this specific crime. They dont have the training or people needed to investigate, they dont have the facilities to analyse evidence, they dont have the authority to obtain evidence or private records, they have no obligation to adhere to the defendants rights, there is no ability to appeal, no obligation of fairness even when it's found that the accused is friends with people on the board... And yet they have the power to destroy …
/r/MensRights20/05/14 01:20 AM
18

YEa, similar thing happened with a Fire Dept in my city a few yeas back. They got all PC that there was not equal representation of women, so they opted to lower the physical requirements to allow more women to pass. Nice and dandy till you consider, fire... does not care what's in your pants. If you're too weak to swing that axe to get out of a burning building, it won't matter how PC you are, you die.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:37 PM
12

Of note, they are not just killing; they burned them alive.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:58 PM
-4

Well two months is enough time for any drug traces to leave the system and there wouldn't be anything physical left.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 08:54 PM
9

Also they have a lower burden of proof, and no observance of rights for the defendant.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:04 PM
20

Sure,but the business should be in charge of investigating criminal offense and holding court over them. The college sea are saying to report the crime to them, not the police; any business that did that would be facing all kinds of lawsuits at the least.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 08:18 PM
1

I'm glad TJ has dropped the Howard Bloom stuff, and is back to his bread and butter vids.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:45 PM
1

That is why we have time delays when doing too much. Do it enough and it'll be limited to just one post an hour.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:05 PM
7

AMR links NP exclusively. Half the links I checked last night were regular and not NP. Even if it's a rule what good is it if it's unenforced? Both commenting and especially voting are strongly discouraged. Does not mean anything. Really this is just basic grownup responsibility. So is maturity... When presented with a dissenting opinion you and your kind resort to name calling and petty insults, while we write actual responses. There is a reason MR is growing, it's becuase people see your behav…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:51 PM
1

Actually it's the fuzzy voting that is used to counter bots. Shadowbans are used to counter trolls and the like, who will keep using their banned account instead of making a new one. WOn't work forever but will provide a brief reprieve till it's found out.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:45 PM
15

AMR includes np links, and warns against downvote brigades But they're not required or enforced, like they are here and SRS and many other of the meta subs. Looking on their front page less than half of the Meta linked posts use them. Not exactly an impressive showing. Make them required and enforce it, THEN you might have a leg to stand on. We don't have the numbers to even pull off half the brigading we're accused of. Guess thats why the Warren Farrell AMA received a record number of abuse rep…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 08:03 AM
13

Mostly because feminists are outnumbered. First, this is BS, for the reason that it's not who outnumbers who but if you really wanted to be about equality it would be of content. In MR we base it on what you write, you could be a KKK Feminist Neo Nazi Console Gamer for all anyone cared if you had an honest and open discussion. In your subs, you could be a board member of NOW and if you did not identify as one of the chosen people you'd be banned, regardless of what you actually had to say. There…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:57 AM
20

/r/feminism and askfeminists are owned by a man who mass-bans feminists too. So? As you often like to say it's a matter of power and having prejudice institutionalized. So a few Feminists get caught in the mix, it does not change the fact that they have a rule on the books that "Unless you are a member of chosen group, you may not speak." And this is a movement you say campaigns for equality for all genders? Here is a bit of advice, when you tell someone they may not speak becuase you dislike wh…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:04 AM
17

You mean like SRSSucks? Or the new AMRSucks? And this matters how? Those subs exist for the same purpose. The highest rated comment in this thread... Well... you are... That's not an opinion, it's a factual statement. having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of one's own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others. You feel so strongly in your position that you setup a meta sub to harass people of a differing opinion. Clearly that demonstrates you feel your …
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:42 AM
50

It's a meta sub whose sole existence is to harass another sub, that is hardly something that would otherwise be supported, but since it's related to MR the Admins let is pass, despite numerous instances of brigading. Your comment is also complete bullshit. Feminist post here all the time to ask questions and they are met with intelligent and honest discussion. But if one identifies themselves as a MRA in many of the Feminist subs then they are banned by the rules in the sidebar which state that …
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:21 AM
41

And yet AMR still exists, a sub entirely dedicated to brigading us.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:32 AM
1

The University did not find anyone guilty of anything criminal. It found a student guilty of violating the schools code of conduct. Except that that code includes things which are of a criminal nature. Show me where they and only they have a right to conduct investigations into criminal matters? In every other such case, the matter is left to the police to investigate and action is taken against them, based on that investigation. If I am accused of embezzling from my employer, that is clearly a …
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:13 PM
4

Might want to read your wiki article, it clearly states that flying cars did not exist in the 50's, at best they had scaled concept model and a prototype that never had a successful test. (And the first flight itself did not happen till '62, thus proving my point) Just like useless drones. Again you are contradicting yourself. You already admitted that droves are actively being used for surveillance and assassinations missions. Are you now asserting that those activities for a military are usele…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:19 PM
1

The school does have that authority and should be expected to hold such a review board. You have not answered WHY though. Why should they have a review board and authority to ruin a persons life. The accused crime was unrelated to academic misconduct which is the purpose of a university. Why hold a review board for academic and rape crime,s but not the myriad of other crimes? The University is not a party of a crime, it is neither the perpetrator or victim. It has no standing to be involved outs…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:02 PM
3

No military on the planet uses exoskeletons or combat drones. And you just admit that they do use drones for military operations. The most advanced militaries on the planet use drones for surveillance and assassination only. So define "fighting" then, becuase if piloting a drone in a sanctioned military operation to attack an enemy is not fighting, then those F22 pilots are not fighting either. The plane and drone are just tools, the only thing that changes is one is controlled via wired signal …
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:43 PM
3

You're the one who made an inaccurate comparison and then reports with a personal attack. It's not my fault you cannot see how different the flying drones of today are compared to the fantastical flying cars of the 50s. Just admit you made a mistake.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:11 PM
5

Not really comparable... See flying cars then... Did not exist. While in today's world, we have exoskeletons, and drones operating, either in labs or in battlefields. Question is less of can we do and and more of is it financially worthwhile. At that point it's just a matter of selecting the best people to pilot them, if a woman shows greater aptitude then a man, she should be allowed, and is legally protected should she be passed over.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:01 PM
2

Except that the basic premise is one which many have issue with. Why should the school have such authority and be expected to hold such a review board. They a re not police trained, they do not have proper resources, the incident was not directly related to the school services. If I was accused, my employer would not get involved unless it had resulted in a detention of my work, but they would not have grounds to hold any legal action against me unless I committed my accused crime against them. …
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:57 PM
1

It's becuase you dont watch the usual daytime TV and celebrity shows.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:49 AM
2

And how many from SRS?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:09 AM
114

Yea, the ex-wife is claiming copyright ownership of the note. http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/family-courts/here-come-the-lawyers-to-avfm-yet-again/
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:28 PM
9

And they have things like the Duluth Model which specifically fault the male in any DV incidents. It'd be like passing a law saying Black people are responsible for all crime; them show how much crime they now commit.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:19 AM
1

Well all the hate he got from the role actually did play a serious role in his life; causing bouts of depression and thoughts of suicide as I recall, which much of the it was from the poor writing his charecter had and not stuff he himself did. And has since written several books, and done VO work and guest appearances on Eureka, Fringe, Big Bang Theory, Leverage.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:34 AM
2

Hell ignore the rape, if a black person robbed a store would they then go and start finger printing every black person in the neighborhood?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:07 AM
2

That's not the original though, the original bit happened when SA was added as mod as a way to spite users. They had been flagging users with abusive flare, and in replace to the outcry, added SA an SRS mod as a mod who proceeded to ban lots of people.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:04 PM
15

Come join us in /r/ainbow, whole point of the subs creation was SRS taking over LGBT.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:01 PM
-1

Sure, but I doubt OP is going to get his boss to walk out on a public street to discuss such things.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:16 PM
18

In private, Maryland is one of the few All party states.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:40 PM
1

Also does not even need to be deaths, circumcision can also lead to erectile dysfunction.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:09 PM
7

Most religious fundamentalists. Male circumcision is the Biblical thing to do, while also valuing every life until it's born, etc... It's like hating gays and clothes of multiple fabrics. In the case of circumcision and hating gays, it's still applicable, and in the case of multiple fabrics it's not OK despite all being from the OT.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:05 PM
9

Yep, very little about our sex lives is up to conscience choice.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:19 AM
8

Yea, it's funny how many of these male dominated fields rely so heavily on personal work ethic. In academic if you're not publishing papers, then you're not getting grants. In programming if you can't write for shit everyone will know the moment they see your code.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:43 PM
2

Well there was the time Jezebel accused me of trying to poison my GF and kill her fetus by attempting to get her to take a Plan B pill without her knowledge; even though they had no basis for this accusation and the pill would not even work that way if a woman is pregnant.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:37 AM
1

Seems NJ has been the only state to have a case determine that the school can have a student's car searched without cause or consent. Otherwise they need one of them to proceed and are otherwise limited to visual/sniffer dogs.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:19 AM
1

He means the justice system, and by extension jail should not be a tool for revenge, as you suggested. We should remove people from society as a whole if they are for w/e reason a threat to it. If people see slavery as an acceptable action, then clearly their view of the world is directly harmful and need to be imprisoned and ideally rehability till they are brought more in line with the whole.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:22 AM
2

I disagree with such a broad statement, you can hold a belief while not being dogmatic about it.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:13 AM
4

Could you go into more details on what you're looking for? I've seen it framed as women who take agency of their bodies to pursue their own happiness are just defining themselves in what would please men/society, regardless of their own feelings.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:11 AM
13

Also for note, neither hold any degrees remotely related to Biology. One a History degree, and the other one of Anthropology; also neither appear to be conducting original research, or publishing anything to journals (one teaches and the other heads some Rights Advocacy group).
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:09 AM
10

Feminist scholars, such as Emily Martin and Londa Schiebinger Of note, neither of these women hold a biology degree or anything even tangentially related. The first holds two for Anthropology and Sinology (study of China), and the other one of History. From the limited reading of their wiki articles and referenced writings of theirs; they both have a gross misunderstanding of the biological process of fertilization, comparing the "failure that is" menstruation to the shedding of a stomach lining…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:07 AM
7

Every child wants to make a game, it's just that their "development" efforts do not go beyond doddle in their notebook during school. Anyone who thought this was going anywhere, from a child with no demonstrated ability to design, code, test, or otherwise do any actual work on a game is a sucker. It's certainly possible fora kid to program and code; it's just that normally for those that can, you can already point to maps and mods for other games as examples of their work; and is actually how ma…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:04 AM
6

Had an "evangelist" at my old company, their job was to do online PR work, like managing twitter/FB, post on forums, etc... basically all the free advertising stuff.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:23 AM
3

Yea, ideally get a couple of the other guys named and pitch in for a CD letter from a lawyer. When I had to send one it was like $200.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 05:50 PM
9

Exactly... Should I be allowed to walk down a back alley in a crime ridden neighborhood flashing a Rolex and wad of cash? Certainly! Would I ever do that? Of course not, becuase in our world crime exists and I am not going to take an action which increases the likelihood of me being a victim. These people often seem to base their views on some utopian ideal, where crime does not exist and thus is not something one should consider or plan for.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 07:07 AM
1

I disagree, you'd still have someone who is in a position of power and is abusing it. Whole point is that these kids are not developed enough to be making decisions about compromising themselves in such ways. Two peers is not as much an issue as they have an otherwise equal relationship; it's entirety differ when one person has the ability to fail or pass the other for a required class.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:06 AM
1

Same... It's amazing how driven by sexuality those people can be. Shes cute, therefore, she can do no wrong.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:02 AM
51

There was... Can't recall the name Playbook but got a good bit of controversy as it did the exact same thing. Was pulled from Apple and Google stores.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:08 PM
1

Which goes back onto the women as for the most part, men love women who are interested in and are advertised with sex. Common fantasy is for man's SO to approach him and ask for sex vs. the common foil of her having a headache when he asks.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 08:03 PM
3

Are TEDx talks curated? I would imagine if it was open to the public you'd have been lynched before taking the stage.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 05:04 AM
1

I guess it would depend on how broadly they define disability.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 06:30 AM
-1

One thing I never got was tenure for medical practitioners. If a surgeon has a high mortality rate, they should not be a surgeon, tenure or not; and if they are conducting unapproved and radical procedures with no oversight then they need to be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:13 AM
4

Well they usually support it by one off isolated incidents which get widely reported.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:11 AM
6

Of note the men getting away with rape is more a result of rape being a shitty crime that can be hard to pursue due to it's nature. Often times it comes down to a he said/she said, and a DA will not pursue the case since there may not be evidence either way. People who argue that this is letting off a rapist are on the stance that a woman's accusation is evidence enough and that we should not have innocent till proven guilty. Sadly this is the reality we live in, where criminal accusations need …
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:18 AM
5

It's hat in this specific case case it does not seem like it's overly an issues of race or gender, just the usual bullshit cop work. Men and Minorities do get harsher treatment under the law but that does not mean we need to start posting every singly arrest in the whole country/world here. NYPD has something of a history for being trigger happy, and there is nothing else there that says he was unduly targeted outside the ordinary.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:13 AM
18

So the standard Think of the Children argument?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:13 AM
30

Exactly, gone are the days of company loyalty. Now they'll fire you after years if it'll mean saving a nickel on the quarterly reports.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:32 PM
5

IDK why but they always seem to schedule these times for the most inopportune times for normal people. I guess they take the time with the lowest attendance and dedicate it to the special time.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:23 PM
14

So the opinion is that it is completely factual? Women can have an abortion and men don't have any say in it. Thus the followup question, should men have something comparable? This might come as a shock, but facts dont have an opinion bias. They are either true, or not, the conclusions drawn from then later are what have bias, and is pretty obvious where yours is.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 01:12 PM
1

wat! What's wrong with having such a fantasy? So long as it's not hurting anyone, what business is it of anyone else?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:38 PM
2

Well I am talking about an idealized state, not so much what each and every person could afford.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:12 PM
1

TBH I never really got that, shouldn't the two groups get along really well? One likes a show about anthropomorphized ponies; the other likes to dress up as anthropomorphized animals.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:45 PM
2

Oh yea, I did not think of them marrying before being sent off.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:20 PM
1

Well I am curious about the women on that part, their ages went way down as well. Maybe older ones who worked in the factories did not need to marry when the men returned due to their new found financial independence, leaving mostly younger ones who were not able to save money for the men? Also not as much of a sudden dip during WWI, though the US wasn't as heavily involved either. And was pretty stagnant for men during Vietnam.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:17 PM
15

Mom & Dad lose job, family cannot pay rent, gets kicked out. But if Mom & Dad split up, somehow the child has some cosmically granted entitlement to keep the same kind of lifestyle. Either you believe in no child support or we need some kind of state provided child support for all children and their parents.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:44 AM
1

I like TJ, I just wish he'd explore stuff in a more serious way. Often times it seems like it's just 5 minutes of him ranting on a subject. SHit gets old when it's the same talking points time and time again, just with a different base topic. Noel Plum is also a good one, though does a bit more on the meta drama of that "scene": http://www.youtube.com/user/noelplum99/videos
/r/MensRights21/10/13 07:26 PM
1

The ACA for w/e reason is also still supporting PZ Myers, despite the recent rape accusation and legal issues with him and Michael Shermer.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 07:23 PM
2

On the plus side with Matt, he got a taste of his own medicine with the whole Atheism+ stuff from a while back. Made a sock puppet account to get a fresh/non-celebrity perspective since he'd been advocating for the tolerance and understand yet wide reports to the contrary; and when he revealed himself had people saying he raped them with his dishonesty and other off the wall shit and got banned. Realistically, none of the major names there seem interested in even discussing it and just resort to…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 07:20 PM
2

Also don't forget in many dictionaries, the crime of rape is something a man does to a woman, so by AronRa's line of reasoning, men cannot be the victims of rape, ever.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 07:16 PM
0

Because god forbid people be responsible for their own actions.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:24 AM
9

Was a typo from the original news article: http://www.laramieboomerang.com/articles/2013/05/15/news/doc519303f6ba00d303141049.txt Glock 22 .40 caliber handgun.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:49 PM
14

Also of note, while claiming to be an advocate for gun control; walked into her bosses office and threatened him with a glock after he fired her. http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=4757 She plead guilty and got six years of... probation
/r/MensRights17/10/13 05:16 PM
1

Why? Its the decision of the couple that one would stay home instead of using the possible dual earned income to pay for a nanny.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:06 PM
7

Yea thats my point, the meaning behind their usage is not the same as in real life. hat and it's kinda hard to do it by mistake, people who use them as a source just do it since they know it'll be easy pickings. Need a "death threat" in response to finding the cure for cancer? 4chan most vulgar and vile language along with shock images If you think material posted to 4chan is shocking never visit gurochan.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 01:11 PM
11

Exactly, 4chan speak is not the same as elsehwere on the internet and real life. It's like comparing Fag the term for cigarette, and Fag the derogatory term for gay people.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 11:38 AM
17

Sure, but that just gets back to the original issue that woman can have it done for free, while men cannot despite being victim to the same kind of illness.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:42 PM
35

A while back there was an issue here women getting mammograms were covered by insurance or the state but men were not; i think this is just an example of the issues with such a policy. He could still get one, if he could pay out the ass for it. While a woman would not.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:31 PM
1

I haven't been keeping up of late, which was the whole point of why I was asking.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:49 PM
1

He's been back for a LONG time; I am referring to like six months ago when his second? book came out. There aass some HB stuff while he was away, but then it kept up after he was back, still getting like 5 videos a week for HB.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:38 PM
1

Why should I be subbed to a channel that does no bother putting out the contact it says it will? It's one thing when there is a guest video, but when 80% of the contact on TAA channel is of Bloom when he has his own far less successful channel, why should I bother with TAA? Number of and location of subs can help a channel even if you never watch the actual videos.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 06:33 PM
0

So has TJ stopped with the Howard Bloom crap and is back to his own videos? I like his stuff but got tired of seeing five Howard Bloom ones every week and one from TJ.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:05 PM
16

Dave Foley has to pay $17k/mth for two kids. Interesting bit, if the parents were together, and one becomes unemployed or makes less money; no one bats an eye that they now have to adjust their lifestyle. But when divorced the wife and child now have some god given right to maintain the same lifestyle.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:36 PM
-1

I think you people need to stop trying to dumb it down, and address it for what it is. Guilty/Not Guilty If you're so dumb that you cannot grasp that simple concept and need it further dumbed down then you should not be in the US.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 10:13 PM
-1

Just because you keep repeating it does not make it right. Show me one case, ever where a court of the US ruled a defendant was innocent. Courts rule on guilt, they find you guilty or not guilty.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:44 PM
-8

First off... That is not the term used, the term is: "Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat" Which basically boils down to: "The onus is on the accuser" The accuser must make his case and prove the accused is guilty. Being not guilty is logically not the same as being innocent. You could have committed a crime but still be found not guilty, by way of extenuating circumstances. Happens everyday.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:41 PM
-7

Actually as those are positive claims hey would require evidence for you to prove them. By that reasoning i am god almighty and can kill Fluffy for i am the source of all that is moral and just.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:28 PM
-3

You just proved my point. They decide on your guilt not on your innocence. Stop dumbing it down, you're part of the problem with this misinformation.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 09:26 PM
-5

Actually thats exactly what the parent said. If there is insufficient evidence to prove that a person committed a crime and a jury finds that person not guilty, then for all intents and purposes they are innocent. Courts in the US do not now nor ever found people innocent, to say otherwise only further confuses the issue. Being found not guilty only means that the defense put forth a better argument then the prosecution. You can find evidence which contradicts the claims of the prosecution that …
/r/MensRights12/09/13 07:59 PM
-5

No, it is not, legally or otherwise. We could not find proof this person committed the crime. I not the same as: We found proof (by way of not finding proof of them committing the crime) showing this person did not commit the crime. If anything they are exactly opposite. Explain to me, how you will prove a negative.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:14 PM
-5

If there is insufficient evidence to prove that a person committed a crime and a jury finds that person not guilty, then for all intents and purposes they are innocent. This is logically impossible, you cannot prove a negative. The courts judge based on guilt, two sides make their case and the stronger one (ideally) win. Just because one side is not able to ascertain sufficient admissible evidence does not necessarily PROVE that they are innocent. You seem to be arguing that a lack of evidence i…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:07 PM
-16

People like to see things as simple black and white. Not Guilty =/= Innocent, often times people have a hard time understanding this, and do think the two are equitable.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:37 PM
1

Sorry but i fail to feel much sympathy for people who opt to believe stuff on blind faith and not think skeptically about the claims.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:18 PM
7

I'm not sure on the rules of doxxing now, but I assume linking to posts I have personally made should be allowable. http://www.reddit.com/r/houston/comments/nbd2i/word_of_warning_to_men_shopping_at_the_downtown/
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:51 PM
13

I dealt with this first hand. The pharmacist refused to sell me a BC pill. WHen it got reported on you would not believe the number of people that started accusing me of trying to poison my GF with it; because a guy with a free lunch hour could not ever pop in and pick up medicine for his busy GF.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 05:48 PM
3

Well to clarify that sentiment is often expressed with regards to the number of rape accusations that never see court; saying that it's because of sexism/patriarchy. But what they fail to consider is that often times rape is a he said/she said situation, and there simply is not sufficient evidence to support a case going to court. And while some real rapists may get off, the more important thing I would argue is maintaining the burden of proof and assumption of innocence for accusations.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:02 PM
9

I think it should be looked as the harm done from the lie. Lie about rape and you might send someone away for life to be raped in prison.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:00 PM
58

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,157165,00.html Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar, also sees some value in this loose use of "rape." She says angry victims of various forms of sexual intimidation cry rape to regain their sense of power. "To use the word carefully would be to be careful for the sake of the violator, and the survivors don't care a hoot about him." Comins argues that men who are unjustly accused can sometimes gain from the experience. "T…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:59 AM
9

And... does this test involve how much maple syrup you can carry? /s
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:46 PM
86

Not too dissimilar to a couple years back people advocated for an easier test for female firefighters since the strength/endurance requirements were harder for women. Because fire really gives a shit what you have in your pants.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:25 PM
2

In other news... Blacks is white and White is black; therefore It's BLACK people in power against us Whites!
/r/MensRights06/09/13 08:04 PM
2

Image removed
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:37 PM
10

I think it's more out of sympathy for women. Women in proposition must be in a hard place in life, no need to make it harder, etc...
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:49 PM
13

Quite a few places now only arrest the Johns, and ignore the actual prostitutes.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:39 PM
3

You know it's funny how much women have fought for their rights and yet still portray themselves as property of men. WOmen seem all too willing to give up agency for their sex lives, private relationships, professional achievements, etc...
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:38 PM
6

Hey let's hire people based entirely on their skin color and pass up the more qualified person. Yep works there too.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:52 PM
2

The study seems mostly bunk, but the comments critiquing it are what I thought might of of interest to those here. In addition to finances it seems to ignore the realities of male behavior in our society and things have changed over the last 50 years. 50 years ago, two drunks fighting, no big deal; maybe lock them up till they sober up in the morning. Now though, you'll like be getting sued by the other party, maybe even the bar, and patrons; you will be seeing jail time and have to hire an expe…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:13 PM
1

Difference though is that in MR you're not banned for having a difference of opinion.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:23 PM
22

The feminist subs at one point had a rule that all posts had to be made by a Feminist. Does not matter if you had a cure for cancer, if you're not a feminist then its removed and you're banned. Officially the rule is gone but is still being enforced.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:33 AM
1

I remeber War Inc. played it a ton back in the day.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:57 PM
2

obvious troll is obvious
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:29 PM
0

By using "cis" and "trans" you no longer have this effect. Except you're just complicating the matter. YOu're saying we need to reform society around a minority who as it is would still have to place a modifier there. And even then what if one does not fit into cis/trans. Sexiality and gender are fluid. This might come as a shock, but people rarely fit into neat little predefined boxes for your convenience.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:55 PM
2

Same, I am quite surprised by the reaction here in MR. YOu'd think a group that purports itself to be about equality and open mindedness would not be so rigid in wanting to group people into what they see is man and woman. Reminds me a while back some blog post that got popular about how Transwomen are actually men who are just trying to shirk their responsibility and get in on Womens benefits. In my ummm.... social circles, there are often people that take on titles for themselves, many I find …
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:54 AM
2

The guest is clearly implying that Manning is a man as well, and is just faking being a women, which as a result she will be raped for being effeminate. EDIT: the "cis" terminology at least for me just reeks of SJW political correctness.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:07 AM
1

So you're saying that Trans people do not exist by nature of the fact we cannot rewrite our DNA and change our basic chromosomes?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:21 PM
4

erroneous and inaccurate titles So at what point does it become accurate?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:20 PM
9

Physically yes; but where do you draw the exact line of when one transitions? If someone identifies as gay I'm not going to ask them to fuck a guy before I believe them.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:19 PM
4

Yea, I am curious where they draw the line. Is it dressing as a woman? Hormones? Surgery? Mannerisms?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:17 PM
10

Well thats getting into another topic altogether. Generally its that out of etiquette and politeness that you use their preferred identity.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 08:47 PM
18

IDK about that... On average sure, but this isn't a traffic ticket. Leaking classified military docs and embarrassing a major world power is not the sort of thing the leaders who were caught red handed are going to be too keen on giving you a pussy pass for.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 08:36 PM
12

We're referring to how the guest is referring to her. He's referring to her as being a fake/pretending, and thus the others who she is with are the real ones.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 08:06 PM
14

Is Manning a 'fake' man? Depends on the definition you're using. She identifies as a woman so that's what we ought to refer to her as. The guest though clearly means that shes a fake woman and will be attacked more so for it.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 07:46 PM
16

meh, doubt they care, they still continue to referring to Manning as male.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 07:44 PM
15

As opposed to? The guest is clearly implying that Manning is still a man, and is going to be raped by all the other men who identify as men, and would like to rape Manning for her desire to be a woman, and all of which that often times entails.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 07:36 PM
73

For those curious about why this a MR isuse, Manning is a pre-op Transwoman who the CNN guest is joking about being raped in prison by all the other real men; and prison rape is all too often not seen as a issue and "part of the package" for men in prison.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 07:27 PM
1

You reposted the same idiotic reply to my own comment and when got called out refused to reply, even though you knew your reply was off topic. That's great in theory but what if the parent paying child support is late/frequently unreliable? That has absolutely no bearing in any way shape or form on abuse of payments. Having someone pay late has nothing to do on how they are paying. You're conflating two different issues. Arguing that categorizing payments is bad because people pay late is not to…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:37 PM
1

BUt without the parents how would you know they exist? Go to a toy store, one aisle is pink like your room, with pictures of girls just like you; and the other of pictures of boys like your brother. Which aile will you be more drawn to?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:43 PM
1

ummmm... ok
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:32 PM
1

First, being able to view the purchases is a privacy concern (stalker ex-spouse??) Who said this? Is ure said no such thing. I just said they would pay into an account and it's be divided up as decided by a judge/the system. Only ones who would need to see would be the courts and custodial parent. Second, say I spend money from my savings on something for the child (say something popped up unexpectedly) and then 'pay myself back' by using CS money to go out to the bar one night. If the amounts e…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:31 PM
1

What about upbringing? Often times girls are brought up and told that they should be playing with Barbies and Cooking play sets while boys are given Legos and Chemistry sets. Is it nay wonder that those boys end up growing up with an interest in STEM fields? Was recently my GF's nieces bday and I wanted to get her a 3DS and Animal Crossing, but the GF and her parents said basically that video games are for boys.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:53 PM
1

And i fully admit it does, probably also some i have not thought of; but the arguments being proposed are not them. One could argue say the ethical side of sharing the load 50% for each parent. How much work should be allotted to the custodial parent?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:38 PM
1

I was mostly criticizing the idea that the contents of the payment can only be applied to things within a pre-defined range, given that those things - food, school supplies, shoes - are often things you need RIGHT THEN. Then you get into an issue where instead of buying school supplies they buy luxury foods like steaks. ALso you expressly said the issue was of being late in payments. So what happens then when child support isn't sent? We already have that as an issue, and it's completely off top…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:59 PM
-1

It's a non-issue. YOu're assuming that via checks, no one is ever late. The form of payment has zero effect of the frequency of payment. (Actually doing it electronically is faster as has been demonstrated in real life) Doing it via a card would just cut down on abuse. My CS check is late, and my child needs to go see a doctor; guess i'll have to pay out of pocket. My CS bank deposit is late in the mail, and my child needs to go see a doctor; guess i'll have to pay out of pocket.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:04 PM
-3

Which just as idiotic as I replied to it. Being late is a non-issue. You're conflating two different problems. Explain how doling out money in the form of a bulk check, will make it easier to pay then on a card? By your reasoning, companies should be paying more regularly/faster via paper checks, vs. direct deposit. Real life does not support you. My CS check is late in the mail, and my child needs to go see a doctor; guess i'll have to pay out of pocket. My CS bank deposit is late, and my child…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:02 PM
-3

That's great in theory but what if the parent paying child support is late/frequently unreliable? Being late would happen under either system regardless. This only addresses the issue of abuse for usage on non-child related expenses. This could be easily resolved via wage garnishment. Take it out before the person is paid. HR depts are much more reliable. As for paying out of pocket initially, why not? Setup the system to be reimbursement based. You got a budget of $300/mth in medical bills. Tak…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:39 PM
-3

So say she spends her entire paycheck on bills then school fees, lunch money, extra curricular activities, etc. and then when she finally receives CS late and she's broke they don't have money to go to Dave & Buster's as a reward for working hard in school. I specifically said to categorize it. You could not spend 100% of it on one thing. clothes, school, medical, entertainment. Also being late is not really a flaw given it's even worse under the current system. Itd still have an effect but woul…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:33 PM
-2

I really think CS should be treated more like WIC or other assistance program. Don't just cut a check; setup a budget in different areas, clothes, school, medical, entertainment. When the custodial parent goes to spend a money they can use the CS debit card and it'll deduct based on the items being bought from the budget pool. If one area runs out, then it's on the custodial parent to fulfill the need. Thus you cannot spend all of the school budget on going to the movies. If a portion of the bud…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:07 PM
1

Seems unlikely he'd pay to hire a botnet to flag his own channel, and then hope the PR backlash can be tied to Theists or Feminists, in order to drum up more views for a short while. Botnets aren't cheap, and he does not have a lot of disposable income.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:10 AM
2

Yea, because /r/Feminism is some niche sub no one frequents.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:40 PM
2

Feminists in the end hate dissent, Yep, they have had as a rule in their sub that to ask a question or post a top comment you had to be a Feminist. Talk about champions of free speech... if you're not one of the blessed group you may not speak.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:46 PM
1

Well not really illegal, so much as on the line for any possible damages. Whole point of the DMCA is to help protect the middleman hosts. If you run a host and you chose not to honor a DMCA that's entirely within your rights, but you'll also have your ass sued before they finish reading your reply.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:45 PM
1

Also don't such things require a lot of users? Like a few hundreds/thousand for established channels?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:43 PM
3

BBC did recently highlight that blocking/reporting tool SRS/SJW wrote not too long ago on the BBC. Seems like a huge coincidence that a tool that reports channels as spam would get international attention then less than a week later a popular channel goes down.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:42 PM
2

Same, it's amazing how many of these A+/Feminists seem to not understand this, all the while decrying free speech issues in other countries. Hell just go look at that guy from not too long ago, asked the same question here and over in /r/Feminism. Over there they banned and deleted his post; here we offered debate.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:41 PM
2

Yep... They have a core set of ideas that are beyond reproach or question, to do so would undermine the very basic building blocks; and if you do waste your time with it, you will be met with petty name calling and all sorts of fallacies.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:36 PM
2

Thunderf00t did a vid on it and how the BBC dropped the ball on reporting about it.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:34 PM
4

Sounds like something you'd hear from the Nietzscheans in that Andromeda show.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:31 PM
45

Yep, funny how /r/Feminism and NOW are always silent about such things.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:41 AM
2

Yea, therein lies the problem, the ones who have TV shows, book deals, boards of organizations; all get to impose their views on others.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:54 PM
6

She has every right to 'go into a bad mood' because that's her natural reaction. Does not mean it's a mature response to the situation though. It's understandable that a child might get annoyed that due to heavy rain they cannot go to the toy store, they're immature. An adult will understand that driving in heavy rain may be dangerous and they can go to the store the next day. Exhibiting Empathy, Caution, and Patience.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 08:40 PM
8

our -> out
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:15 PM
14

While mine does not excuse it or make such claims; she will get in a bad mood if I decline. I'll be involved in some really intricate soldering and she comes over trying to get me in the mood while I'm holding an open flame or am trying not to burn our an IC.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 02:40 PM
16

It's always For The Child, which is a BS excuse in this case when you consider he has custody.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 11:51 AM
6

Maybe they should just bring back Hysteria and The Vapors as medical conditions.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 11:46 AM
1

Nope. Theism by definition requires a belief in a god or other supernatural being. Therefore Atheism is the lack belief in that. You're referring to plain old superstition. https://www.google.com/search?q=define:+theism&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari
/r/MensRights09/08/13 09:10 PM
0

Not really seeing how that's relevant. A+ does not allow for the questioning of it's shared beliefs; which under the idea of Atheism cannot have shared beliefs, since it's by definition a lack of belief in a god, nothing more. If you're a Progressive, Humanist, Democrat, Fiscal Conservative, Skeptic; that has nothing to do with you being an Atheist.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:19 PM
5

Oh I agree, and that was kinda my point. Atheism does not require that you follow X, Y, Z, etc... All it requires that you not believe in a god.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:38 PM
2

About which part? Asking for proof of claims, pretty common on a variety of subjects over there.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:14 PM
10

Sounds like Rush Limbaugh. I'm not accusing Obama of being a Commie Al Qaeda Terrorist, I am just asking what if he was?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:44 PM
0

they like a TV show primarily because the actor is hot. Sounds like my GF actually. She'll see a preview and it will look like shit, but it's got a hot male lead. Meanwhile she finds it weird I can appreciate older movies and actors.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:41 PM
17

Yep, the whole A+ started in part because /r/Atheism was not too keen on the whole Feminism ideology. Someone makes a claim about the Wage Gap, and others will ask for proof and offer the same studies you see here refuting it.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:30 PM
21

The whole A+ thing is becoming it's own sort of religion. There are a set of specific tenants that are beyond reproach and question; anyone who does so is marginalized by way of criminal accusations instead of logical debate. Except instead of saying people are false prophets, they accuse them of being misogynists. Entire setup is kinda dumb anyways, all Atheism is, is a lack of belief in a god. Anything else about social or political ideology are their own things.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:27 PM
3

ANd no users really spoke up in objection.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 09:01 PM
11

Yea, but the reports are heavily one sided against men, mainly because no one takes reports of DV against men seriously like this police dept has demonstrated. Or they have laws on the books declaring that regardless of the situation, you arrest the man, even if he's on the floor bleeding with the woman holding a knife. (Duluth Model) They setup a situation where men cannot be victims, then cite the lack of male victims as support for such situations.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 12:56 PM
12

At the very least, assault by contact. Had a similar deal happen to me with being pulled off the steps of a bus, hit my head and filed a police report; bitch stayed the fuck away from me from that point onward.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 12:51 PM
3

YEa, when sentenced women on average get something like 40% of the sentence a man gets for a comparable crime. Still waiting on NOW to campaign to end this obvious inequality that directly benefits women.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 12:46 PM
1

I know right, I mean you would think at 13 he would know how to use an apostrophe in "Ive".
/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:08 PM
5

Sorry? Did you mean that this troll is them?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:24 PM
6

They are more like obvious troll stuff. "Get back in the kitchen" kind of stuff.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:21 PM
2

Could you link to a source? I have heard they favored him before but have never actually seen anything cited regarding it, all the searches now are flooded with stuff about the protest or out of context quotes.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:04 PM
1

Yea, but I was curious if there was a source? Seems like searching now is just a ton of stuff on the Protest and nothing really before it.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:42 PM
16

You gotta check the downvoted comments before they are removed. Happens on the more popular threads. Anita Sarkisian and Rebecca Watson are quite good at grabbing them and using them as evidence of how misogynistic MRA are.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:20 PM
41

There are extremists here, but they usually get downvoted or banned. EDIT: Example
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:00 PM
18

Didn't many Feminists at one point support Farrell?
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:58 PM
6

Same logic behind that wage gap crap. Why would a business employ a man for $1 when they could get a woman for $0.77? That's a 23% reduction in payroll across the board, that's fucking HUGE for a business's bottom line. And yet no one, from multinational conglomerates to Mom&Pop shops is not practicing that.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:13 PM
2

At least reason managed to get in on the 4th parent comment.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:40 PM
19

Or that might have. We know nothing about the officers leaning and at best assumptions about the protestor.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:13 AM
1

Same, when I Worked retail I would fold bedsheets, and make the model beds.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:23 PM
1

No competition, just an idiot making claims that he refuses to back up. A claim made without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:27 PM
2

Yep, she needs to be called out for her BS at every opportunity; especially given how she claims to want to spark discussion but censors all comments and discussion.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:41 PM
8

Exactly, remember her analysis of the Bayonetta game? Turns out she never even played it, just went off the box art and trailer.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:39 PM
0

Surprising support from the article comments, seems they too are calling it out.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:42 PM
3

Also of note, warning shots are not permitted under that same logic. If you discharge a weapon it should be as a matter of self defense to kill.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:48 PM
1

Which by censoring the content it defeats that purpose. The place becomes no better than Fox News and it's obvious bias.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:01 PM
10

Would not be surprising. Lord knows they cannot tolerate their dogmatic beliefs being questioned.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:51 PM
268

I thought this /r/Bestof post was quite interesting given this occurrence: alttt explains why any kind of censorship is a bad thing EDIT: Got a PM from a throwaway from one of the mods: Seems they don't all agree: http://www.reddit.com/r/AdviceAnimals/comments/1iwnc6/really_rbestof_did_srs_threaten_you_or_something/
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:48 PM
90

Am curious too because that open letter he wrote was targeted more to an incident with SRS.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:46 PM
7

But the gender is not an issue now, it's not an issue tomorrow and it won't be for years down the line, so stop being a so overly PC about it till it becomes relevant.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:41 PM
1

Just make sure to backup and record any interactions you have with them. If they ignore you or take action against you then you have a case you can prove.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:36 PM
5

reminding people So... it's about being a asshole? Taking the time to constantly remind people of an issue that won't be a thing for years later down the line. Maybe we should send the happy couple a notice every hour of every day that they should be mindful of the child's choices on gender.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:32 PM
2

Yea, I stopped watching when he started making fun of furry people and called them gay. If you're not some stereotypical hound dog trying to bang every pussy, then you must be gay! Plus they will leave out certain important bits if it does not fit their agenda. Read a story on Reddit and get both sides, but they will only report the one that helps them.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:26 PM
4

Then in 15 years THEN they can whine.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:07 PM
-4

FUCK YOU, Superman rules!
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:57 PM
13

And what would you say about putting that expectation on the mind of a child that is so under developed it cannot even express itself to begin with? If a child feels it's gender is not right for them, then they should change it when they feel comfortable doing so. Not when it cannot even speak.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:52 PM
18

I wonder if they will let their child choose their own name? Or let them choose to stick a fork in a socket?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:06 PM
5

Whites owning blacks was once okay, so now it's black people's turn. Best part is, your average white person at the time did not own slaves. Slaves were expensive back then, a fit male could easily go for $2000 at auction, which is around like $40,000 in today's money. Only people buying slaves were the elite rich people who could make use of them in hard labor to make more money.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:01 PM
5

For a idiotology about equal rights, it's odd how they seem to be silent whenever a man is the victim at the hands of a woman.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:04 PM
7

They can still be sued civilly. Even if you dont MEAN to cause harm, if you play a role in causing it you can be sued.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 04:50 PM
2

Well at the time I sort of did... Not much to tell really about it that wasn't originally. She got fired and I got some corporate "apology" and haven't gone back to CVS. Were you curious about anything?
/r/MensRights19/07/13 06:40 PM
1

Big differance between Reddit and Jez. Jez has editors who have final say over articles published. If it goes up on the site someone in Management gave it the OK. With Reddit there is no such oversight by the Admins.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:51 PM
4

Free speech does not mean you get to make criminal accusations. They literally falsely accused me of a crime, are you going to say that false accusation are covered by free speech? Disagreement is "They should not sell a man a PlanB pill", accusation is "He wanted it to give to his GF without her consent or knowledge".
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:11 PM
17

Jezebell needs to be removed from the internet. I was denied being allowed to buy a PlanB pill, and was interviewed/written about by a number of papers. Jezebell decided to twist the story to make it seem like I was trying to poison my GF and have her take it without her knowing; even though I was very clear in every statement that she had already take one the previous night, and we keep one on hand as a "backup". Had a lawyer friend send them a threatening letter and they updated the story, but…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:54 PM
0

Still waiting on your source link Mr. Scholar.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 09:31 PM
0

Still looking for an actual reference, not random claims to make people go search. Hell all you said is it was a 2009 article in the DM about her. You could at least cite an author, month, etc...
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:44 PM
1

Personally I think GWW's YOutube channel would be better to link to: http://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:50 PM
0

Who are often held in even worse regarding in Feminism then cis males.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:49 PM
-2

Daily Mail as a reference? I guess thats why it's been banned in many subs and is largely ignored till anything written there can be backed up from a more reliable source. Also nice how you're unable to actually reference anything; you're making claims then telling other people to go find proof for them.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:48 PM
7

Yea someone asked a question like that not too long ago; basically what you would concede to the other side. HEre it was not super popular but still had discussion, but in the Feminist oriented sub it was deleted and the user banned. Really goes to show which group is the one advocating tolerance and free speech.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:45 PM
0

What argument? I took no stance on anything just repeated a wiki article. Go make your assertions there and see if its not removed then you'll have a leg to stand. Also nice how you can never reply when a topic is popular only days later when no one will see what you said.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:17 PM
-3

Being as you're an obvious troll... For those who might actually think you were serious: Rosie the Riveter Not the same person as in the image. It's frequently misidentified as such. This is the original reference/song, which was debuted a year before the iconic image was published. was a fucking MODEL Actually she was not, she was a real factory worker, and did not model of any publications. She never even knew about it till some 40 years later after it became popular.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:17 PM
23

It is kinda odd how they often hold it up, despite being made without Doule's consent.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:30 PM
136

Fun Fact, the woman in that poster (Geraldine Doyle), only worked for a short time at the factory due to the dangerous conditions; she feared a hand injury that would impact her playing the Cello. Also it was never meant as a recruiting tool, it was only displayed for like two weeks to internal employees of the Westinghouse company; Doyle actually did not even know she had been used as the model, till after it became famous decades later. It wasn't till it was rediscovered in the 80's that it be…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:20 PM
1

As I recall, there is a real medical benefit, but it's so small that it's heavily outweighed by the possible complications. Something like a 0.14% decrease in STDs (less surface area = less area for contact) but will also raise the incidence of ED and other issue by an order of magnitude. You could say the same about removing a woman's breasts and breast cancer. If we removed them, then the woman would be less likely to develop breast cancer.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:58 PM
-2

So does anyone else here like this food called pizza?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:53 PM
3

Well I think for the most part, unless agreed beforehand people on dates should go dutch. Assuming the man will pay, is one of the issues we strive to overcome.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 10:42 PM
0

Maybe, but I think the fact that a prostitute also makes it clear that the transaction is purely one of a business nature should still count for something. No different than a farmhand exchanging wear on his body, his time and effort to work the field in exchange for money.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:36 PM
18

Also those that choose it probably are not believed. Most people at that age would still be in or just recently graduated college. So seeing them claim such a high income would be highly questionable. Might even be a red flag for some. If he lied about income, what else could he have lied about?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:17 PM
2

Guess that's why OP is seriously defending and rationalizing why it's OK for a man to bail on a woman and leave her with the check, but not for her to do the same to him. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1i2z1a/what_attracted_you_to_mepic/cb0o46e
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:15 PM
4

Except OP is seriously defending that it's OK to bail and humiliate a woman but not a man. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1i2z1a/what_attracted_you_to_mepic/cb0o46e
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:15 PM
8

Except in the second you are also deceiving them by purposely misrepresenting your income, and also misrepresenting that you have an genuine interest in them. B. Claim to make a six figure salary. I highly doubt if you told them upfront, that you're going to bail and have no interest in them, they would agree to a dinner date. In reality your interest is just to humiliate them and get a free meal at their unexpected expense. How would you feel if a woman bailed half way though a dinner and stuck…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:11 PM
0

Technically OP did in his parent comment: C. Watch your mailbox get clogged by golddiggers. In any case what's wrong with Prostitution? So long as the people are happy I don't have an issue with such a relationship, if you can call it that; though I would not engage in such a setup. I may not agree or approve with what they are doing, but I will not interfere either, similarly if someone may not agree with my relationship setup, I would expect them to hold their opinion and not interfere.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:05 PM
0

I would think it's similar to what you said: All those that depend solely on their husbands financially But I'd also not a distinction for those relationships where it was mutually agreed that it'd be a one income household. Such as say, taking care of a young child. If desire for money is the main motivating factor to being in a relationship with someone, and forsakes other more "substantial" traits then I would consider that person a golddigger.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:55 PM
0

Depends on how you define "many". Plus you get into the realm of a positive claim that would need to be backed up.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:39 PM
0

How do you mean? Personally I don't find obese people sexually attractive. I try to not prejudge them or hold prejudices against them because of it, as obesity can have a verity of causes, not just overeating. It's just that if I go to seek out porn for example, I won't really go for the kind with those models. The quote was an example of my overall point to demonstrate how someone can take a commonly considered "shallow" trait and use it to invalidate other traits that we consider to have more …
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:30 PM
2

Oh yea, you're right; but it's disingenuous to decide that all people who want a partner with money are inherently golddiggers.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:24 PM
2

So? Is it wrong to find overweight people unattractive? What about people with tattoos? Or wear glasses? Short hair? Issue is when you base it solely off income/weight/other "shallow" attribute. here is a person with a nice income/body, shared interests, attractive personality, etc... but they are fat/poor so I will ignore them. THAT is an issue and shallow.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:57 PM
3

Not necessity, a woman can be attracted to a man with wealth even if she herself has wealth. Maybe even prefer one like that since it'll mean he will not need to burden her with his financial issues.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:25 PM
13

I really wish the supporters of that comment would explain why it's not OK for the woman to use the man as a purse to pay for her stuff. Yet it is OK for the man to use the woman as a wallet and stiff her with a check without warning. Hell regardless of her being a gold digger, that's just an asshole move. As is often said here, equality is not about supporting one gender over another. Thinking that inequality is OK because it supports men, and it's "our turn"; is no better than the attitudes we…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:55 PM
1

But how would you then reconcile you giving that woman in front of you favor to garner her attention? You might say spend more on a birthday gift for her then you would someone you may not find attractive.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:37 PM
54

And stick them with the check? man fuck that. You're no better than them at that point, using them to get a free meal and justifying it by reasoning that because they have different values it's OK to make them burden your load.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:30 PM
2

A very common misunderstanding about objectification is that it is portrayed as bad. As with most things, it's not just black and white; good or bad. It's a matter of the circumstances and application. Objectification can be bad, but it can also be good. When you are with a significant other, you are going to be objectifying the hell out of each other during sex and you (should) both want that. That's also a very common sexual fantasy, people wanting to be degraded to the role of whore/slut, etc…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:28 PM
15

Well wealth can be an indicator of other things... Someone with more income could likely mean they are better with their finances, they are more responsible as a person, someone with the means to be independent. A woman may not want to deal with the hassle of a guy who while making $20k also lives with his parents. A guy who makes say $50k+ is more likely to have his own place, a car, etc...
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:26 PM
4

The fact that someone owns something shouldn't make him a more attractive person. But it's understandable how that can from a biological standpoint. Someone with lots of money is usually going to be more of an "alpha", they will be able to provide for the offspring better, etc... I think the issue is when you stay on that basic level, and ignore the personality and the rest of the person. The only value you have to me is sexual (in a broad sense).
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:22 PM
0

Yea... on a most basic level we are predisposed to people who are healthy and can pass on our genes, and attractive people are usually healthy and offer better chances to pass our genes on further generations. Seeing someone with maintained hygiene and a fit body as attractive is not in and of itself an issue; it's when you start ignoring who they are as a person and actually treat them as an object, property, etc... I bought you jewellery, because you will give me sex. Bad thought process. I bo…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:19 PM
3

YEa, last major public gathering I recall was met with great hostility. ANyone remember the Warren Farrell talk that had a violent protest, a bomb threat and fire alarm pulled to keep it from happening?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:56 PM
-4

Except that unlike women, Christian in both US history and much of European history were the top dogs. They're take on victimhood now is not so much of being actual victims and just not having as much power as they did. Unlike women (and men) who were victims in recent history and still are in some areas.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:53 PM
3

It's amazing how watered down that term is for them. It's actually got a pretty specific definition, yet they throw it around like rice at a wedding. But i guess it's then much easier to claim there is a rapeculture when everything anyone does is rape.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 10:20 PM
2

like it for life. LegoLife SHould totally get that as a tattoo and walk around the ghetto.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:23 PM
4

Except that was a really small sample size, of only 18 cases, and the Rumney is behind a paywall so I've no idea about the ethicacy of the Stewart report.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:02 AM
-1

So? You're missing the point that pushing people is assault, and had OP say fallen down and hit his head, the con and employee could have been sued. Thats why many businesses prefer to let a robber get away with a few hundred bucks or merchandise, if they try to apprehend the robber and he's hurt, he can sue the business for WAY more than what he stole was worth. Just because the employees were told to keep an eye out for it, does not give them the right to assault people and the law usually agr…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:28 PM
3

She could have caused OP some serious trouble, possibly requiring a lawyer; she needs more than to be kicked out.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:35 PM
4

Hopefully there would have been a camera to catch things.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:34 PM
2

Most places dont allow their employees to lay hands on people for good reason, and those that are allowed go through training on how to handle such situation. I highly doubt some PT con worker got that training.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:30 PM
3

I'd have taken it to that employee's supervisor too, they dont get to push you around.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:28 PM
2

Don't forget Spill was there too.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:27 PM
5

It was taken very seriously. Could you elaborate? Was the someone removed, or were people thinking the girl was a fake? I assume the former.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:27 PM
7

I'd have been tempted to involve the police anyways on the employee, for pushing me in that kind of situation.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:17 PM
10

from the very rare, gay ones who get abused by their male partners. I guess no one told them that Lesbian relationships have the highest rate of DV.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:27 PM
8

They can be against it when they stop claiming it. Anita herself made a big deal about all the "threats" she got, which ended up being trolling youtube comments because she made an analysis of Bayonetta despite admitting she never played it to begin with.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:12 PM
35

Yea, how many kids have recently killed themselves not from having their lunch money stolen, but from this more psychological abuse?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:09 PM
3

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 05:07 PM
12

we know that wmen can be just as violent, abusive, and deadly as men Actually, gay couples have the next to lowest rates of domestic violence (hetro men is lowest) while lesbian/bisexual relationships have the highest, with straight ones falling not too far behind. http://www.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml About 17-45% of lesbians report having been the victim of a least one act of physical violence perpetrated by a lesbian partner http://www.thegavoice.com/news/national-news/5…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:58 PM
6

Complain to Caroline Nukes [email protected] ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:32 PM
11

GWW, shes a popular blogger and youtuber, gets posted here comments semi regularly.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:22 AM
1

Id say all of the seven sister schools. There is a reason why they are predominantly geared towards women.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:07 PM
5

Except the student led courts at many universities are based entirely on potential and likelihood. It's one of the big criticisms, while they will not result in criminals charges (those must be brought separately by the accuser like normal) it can result in the accused being expelled from school, loans needing to be paid back immediately, and if they lived in dorms they will be removed. All too often the police will not pursue a case due to clear evidence of it being false, but because the stude…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:22 AM
24

Thats also the school with the Dean who said false rape claims are GOOD for men and we should not be spared having them made against us. EDIT: Source: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,157165,00.html Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar, also sees some value in this loose use of "rape." She says angry victims of various forms of sexual intimidation cry rape to regain their sense of power. "To use the word carefully would be to be careful for the sake of the v…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 11:43 PM
10

Of course the same argument could be said of a fantasy rape porn, or movies, or games, etc...
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:34 PM
1

Considering how common this is, id lean more towards A unless the figures for the other two are an order of magnitude off.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:11 PM
19

Also remember, that until Jan '11, per the FBI men could not be legally raped.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:08 AM
3

And yet oddly appropriate for her.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:38 PM
46

Wonder how they would react to a LadyMRA. Pretty sure they are dickless by default.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:19 PM
18

If he keeps it up. It is after all a crime to send underage people sexually explicit material.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:12 PM
2

Yea, shit goes fast when everyone and their brother starts asking you for money. Nice house for self, parents, siblings, and maybe a close fiend could easily tally up to $1million, plus paying off debt, buying cars, taxes, etc...
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:52 AM
5

Depends on pay out rate. If you we're smart you would consider the inflation rate is often higher than payout, so even at a 50% lump sum, you'll still come out ahead.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:05 AM
4

Between taxes and pay out, you only get like 30% of what you win. Beyond that you'll have your parents asking for a bit to pay off their home, pay off your student loans, buy a home and move out of your Apt, quit your job and "retire", etc....
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:54 AM
8

Spent it on. Friends and family some out of the woodwork, wanting a new car, house, sure fire business opportunity, etc... Happens all the time with people who come into a windfall of money, and is why major sports leagues offer financial advisers to new athletes.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:32 AM
1

Only things I have stated were in the original article and, the % of women in the military. I am still waiting on that citation of YOUR claim.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:18 PM
1

Only things I have stated were in the original article and, the % of women in the military. I am still waiting on that citation of YOUR claim.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:16 PM
1

Everything I said has been 100% factual.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:05 PM
1

And you just got schooled. Face it, you invented half the stuff you said and I proved you wrong at every step. You really need to leave MR, people who just make stuff up are not the kinds of people who we want here.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:01 PM
1

Then why did you say both sexes were effected the same? You contradicted yourself. Citation I never said anything like that, think you might be thinking I'm someone else. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1g7e9d/the_problem_of_unwanted_sexual_contacts_in_the/cahik58 But on a serious note, you are not accounting for how much more likely women are to report an issue than men. I don't have to account for anything. At no point did I ever make or suggest any conclusions, just the cold hard …
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:40 PM
1

I don't think you know what a Fact is then. WOmen make up 14% of active military, yet account for 50% of reported incidents. That is by definition, disproportionate.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:27 PM
3

So... facts are a bias now? Fact is, sexual harassment is spread evenly across the genders. Fact is, men make up far more of the service then women. Fact is, a disproportionately larger number of women are experiencing this issue.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:59 AM
2

Well the wiggle room is that while men make up half the incidents they far far out number women.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:18 PM
4

Why do you say that? I dont recall any instances where their take was an outright lie. Just such as in this case where there is some wiggle room for interpretation.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:06 PM
3

Reminds of of that couple who thought that someone was stealing from them; went to a psychic who said it was someone in their house, and the couple jumped to the conclusion of it being the housekeeper then tortured and murdered her. Had the psychic and this little girl STFU no one would have been harmed.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:30 PM
3

Yea, remember reading not too long ago of some guy, that despite being five years after he was falsely accused and the accuser recanted; still had trouble finding jobs, etc... When people would look him up, it'd be nothing but stories of how he raped some woman; and they would have to look at pages and pages before finding the bits saying she was a lying sack of shit.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:28 PM
7

Also feel free to join us over at /r/LadyMRAs
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:28 PM
5

Same deal for domestic violence. Woman are the victims and Men are the abusers. Except it's shown time and time again that rates are equal and that lesbian couples have a higher incident rate then gay couples.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:13 PM
8

Should start a pool on how fast shell be called a sexist .
/r/MensRights05/06/13 09:47 PM
9

Yep, go look over on /r/Feminism, only Feminists may post articles and parents comments. Does not matter what the content is, if you're not of the blessed group, you may not speak. COmpared to MR where we dont care what your affiliation is, if you have meaningful content, then it'll stand on it's own.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:32 PM
7

YEs, let's stifle any discussion for fear of what MIGHT happen. They are the same. Let's take a controversial topic and lets a group of people harass us into not talking about it. YOu know shes the same person who has done "analysis" of gamers in the past and admitted she never played them to begin with. There is a reason why her credibility is called into question, given her history.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:30 PM
6

Pretty flimsy excuse... By that same reasoning we should not have conventions like TAM or Pride Parades because Theists will make bigoted slurs.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:52 PM
5

She always has, IDK of any of her vids she allowed comments on. That was an issue previously when she announced her intent to do the series. She wanted to do a series to discuss sexism in games, then disables all means of discussion on her channel.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:36 PM
5

She said the money was to buy the games, but people did the math and even at $60/each for the games, it was only like 20% of the money she got. She had said at the start she was not a gamer and didn't game much herself which was always kinda odd that she would then try and critique games as a medium. Aside from changing the oil, I know nothing about cars, therefore Top Gear should hire me as a show host.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:21 PM
17

Yep... turns out he's human and likes sex.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:50 PM
1

Depends what you get... A hall or park rental can run a few grand by itself. Flowers, dress and tux rentals, music/DJ, jewellery, photography, etc... shit adds up fast unless you go DIY route for almost all of it.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:41 PM
4

Hmmm... now I kinda want to play that game, but then again it's on the Wii.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:02 PM
9

He's been easing up off the whole anger thing of late it seems. Went on a vacation recently so I think it kinda mellowed him out.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:02 PM
13

DId you see her Bayonetta "analysis", according to her that's exactly what she did. Never actually played any of the game, just went off the box/manual/trailer.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:00 PM
29

Even worse, shes not even actually even reviewing the games. Just declaring that the mere act of having a male protagonist is itself sexist.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:02 AM
2

No, the way to get people to ignore her, is to ignore her.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:40 PM
1

Huh?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:28 PM
4

Seriously, she was almost unknown before the whole Kickstarter BS.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:47 PM
3

People who are afraid for their sweet government jobs, and that in order to keep them the rules must be followed dogmatically without question.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:21 AM
1

Oh so you've moved onto a new site?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:59 AM
0

That';s why I said it morphed into what it is today.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:57 PM
2

Sure, but you're still missing the practical point. A woman could not walk into bank and get a home loan even if she had a job; which was itself hard enough to get.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:54 PM
4

Not practically speaking. Legally they could, but banks back then, like the ones of today would not be too keen on giving a woman a home loan to buy a house when she has no job, because no one will hire her. when women won the right to vote, it did not come with a corresponding duty to the state in war time. And that is a social issue for both genders, that needs to be addressed.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:42 PM
7

When? Back in the day before they could vote; they most def were treated as a second class. How could a woman be considered on par with a man, when she is not allowed to vote, own property, or hold a job?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:50 PM
28

Know a girl like this at my work. She lives a lifestyle beyond her means, has little to no disposable income, since it all goes to car/rent payments. Her justification is that if she lives in the rich part of town she'll meet a rich guy who will support her. Of course shes going on like 5 years now, and the only guy she had met ended up being imprisoned for embezzlement and was also a domestic abuser.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:03 PM
2

Voyager was more technologically advanced, and had a smaller crew for it's comparable size. Galaxy class could have around 1000 crew, Intrepid (Voyager) had around 140. It was designed to operate with minimal support for long periods of time; of course that mentality does not lend itself to fighting through an entire empire of enemies single handedly.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:52 PM
-6

Did it ever mean equality? Go back to the days of Women's Liberation, how many back then were advocating for it to be socially acceptable for men to be stay at home fathers? I'm fine with women from back then not wanting to be second class citizens and not be treated as property. The issue is it's morphed into this weird setup of many mainstream Feminists wanting gender specific advantages without any of the responsibility. You're a woman therefore we have woman only scholarships for you to take…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:49 PM
1

Well the wormhole went to the Gamma Quadrant, while she was in the Delta. She'd have had to pass through pretty much the entire Dominion territory to reach it, in her tiny lil Intrepid class ship (Intrepid was like half the length of a Galaxy and was meant for long range exploration). So it was a choice of face the unknown or certain death.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:41 PM
0

Huh?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:38 PM
-1

Just pointing out one of their lil technicality bannable offenses. Compare it to here, where we have a highly upvoted post from an admitted Feminist on our FP.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:59 PM
10

It said they had a mother/son seminar planned for later that year.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:56 PM
3

Well her mission at the time was to chase after and apprehend the Maquis Raiders. The Delta Quadrant stuff was a random fluke that no one saw coming. I would think if they actually did have issues fring captains they would have just assigned her a duty on a Starbase doing paperwork, or patrolling some random inner sector in an obsolete POS ship.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:29 PM
2

IDK about Janeway, shes generally accepted as a pretty shitty captain; she'd endanger her crew needlessly while also forgetting about advanced tech that would be directly helpful.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:17 PM
9

FYI /r/Feminism has a rule that all articles and top comments be made by a Feminist, regardless of content. You could me a MRA and saying you found the cure for cancer and you'd be banned.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 06:15 PM
12

Well it's more so that Atheists often happen to be skeptics and will often come to similar conclusions. The problem comes into play when their skepticism does not apply to everything evenly, and we get these dogmatic beliefs like the wage gap, that cannot be questioned; just as any religious claim cannot be question by a believer. I agree with some claims made by Feminists, the issue is if you do not agree 100% with everything, then you're denounced as an misogynist. To the point now that we hav…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:14 PM
13

So SOP for your typical Feminist blogger? I really wish they would stop dragging Atheism into the mix. It literally only addresses the question of "If you believe in a god". But all too often people keep wanting to extend it to a plethora of other social and political issues.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:52 PM
1

It is kinda funny how some of the arguments made actually would lead us back to "the good ol days" of men supporting the family and woman being kept at home to clean.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:12 PM
7

Wait... so women were not actually as they were depicted in 1950's Hollywood and bodice ripper novels?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 11:59 AM
2

Do they commit more, or are just caught more? We know for a fact that some police depts in large cities will purposely profile the black population, so of course more of them will be caught.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:37 PM
4

Sure... but all too often it is chalked up to that black men have some kind of crime gene and thus they commit more.; but when you look in other countries that do not have such an undercurrent of prejudice, they somehow commit less crime.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:43 PM
4

How can you make a comment on how proportional it is, without knowing how much total there is? It's the same argument made by Rad Fems, about women being victims of rape. Let's not count ALL this other crime/rape and voila!
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:35 PM
12

Oh I am sure there are many other factors, it's just not a simple case of "black people commit all the crimes." Petty crime is disproportionately higher for people in poverty for example. And it just so happens many people in poverty are black. White collar crime like embezzlement will be far less common for that same group.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:37 PM
2

Sorry... which part is not OK?
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:32 PM
14

It is insanely high, but also keep in mind you have police depts that have been profiling against them too, so that would skew the numbers. Also the bit about more blacks in prison than were slaves is not really accurate, as the population has ballooned since those times. There are more people living in just Texas today then were was in the entire US at that time.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:12 PM
5

I agree but far too many people are more concerned with netting as many people as they can.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:36 AM
9

Fuck that, who's going to pay for this guys lost earnings, or what the state paid to keep him incarcerated. Locking her up, even for twice the time does not serve any real justice as this guys life is still fucked and the state is still out real money.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:41 PM
7

Therein lies the problem. Rape as a crime is rather troubling because it's so heavily a he said/she said situation. If someone breaks into my home or attacks me there will be evidence that would otherwise not be present had the crime not occurred. (glass being broken from the inside vs. outside) Rape on the other hand is nearly indistinguishable from consensual intercourse, and entirely if you include certain rough/kinky positions. So all you can say with certain is if sex occurred, otherwise it…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:40 PM
8

I'm holding my breath till Jezebel publishes this on their front page.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 10:24 PM
15

Yep, happens every day with straight kids, often with the male being older and the girl younger; and people why shrug and say that's the law. THankfully people in the other threads are not so easily swayed by the obvious propaganda.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:23 PM
18

Exactly, god forbid a woman take responsibility for her actions. How many times do we hear a woman whose being charged with a crime say that it was because she did not get enough attn? Or was abused? etc...
/r/MensRights21/05/13 12:23 PM
2

19 always bothered me. YOu're technically an adult but people still refer to you as a teenager.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 06:24 PM
1

Yea, it's funny how if two parents stay together and the parents become unemployed, they are met with indifference and disinterest. But when the parents are broken up, then the state takes a big interest and there are all kinds of aid programs.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 01:39 PM
1

You really need to see the episode to fully grasp the full etent of whats going on: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6LY7TJ16pg Ok so long story short, you have these owners of a restaurant that cannot handle ANY criticism, going so far as to respond to people who are critical online by calling them names. This has been going on for years. They invited Gordon Ramsey from Kitchen Nightmares to come to their restaurant and basically back them up, that their food is great and it's all these internet…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 12:00 PM
3

Also before she met him, she went to prison for identity theft, stealing someone's SSN and taking out a bank loan in their name. And met her husband while in vegas and married a couple months later.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:54 AM
1

Yea, you cannot deny the man is smart and knows WTF he is doing. If you got a chance to learn from him, then you'd be dumb not to. That being said he could really approach things more constructively, though obviously that does not make for good TV.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:53 AM
2

Except she has a history going back 3+ years of doing that stuff, and said on air that she replies to bad internet reviews by calling people petty names.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:51 AM
26

Dear Penthouse,
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:28 PM
8

I thought it only included things that went to court but did not result in a conviction for w/e reason. Not that that's any better.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:27 PM
3

Yea, never got the deal with putting ages in URLs/names. It's like you do realize you age and grow older?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 08:09 PM
18

NPR can be really all over the place on MR and the like.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 07:08 PM
3

Well to counter that argument, it's a crime to file false police reports regarding, theft, robbery, etc... yet we still have reports of those things.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:07 PM
2

They do take a VERY liberal stance to things, almost to the opposite extreme as Fox. I'll see stuff on Reddit and when reported by them they leave off stuff that was otherwise important.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:05 PM
-1

I stopped watching TYT when Cenk was being an ass about people who live alternative lifestyles. Furries, submissive men (BDSM), etc... If you're not a stereotypical raging horndog man, then you're a freak.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:04 PM
16

Yea, let's see NOW advocate for longer jail sentences.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 12:34 PM
0

Exactly my take, Ins Companies based on factual data. If one group is a bigger risk than another, charge them more.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 11:47 AM
4

Also Universities will encourage it as well. Public police report vs. some internal memo. Guess which one will do more damage to a school's rep?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:24 PM
23

See and that's the think. If I walked around a high crime ghetto flashing cash and valuables, getting mugged is kinda to be expected. Should it happen? No But the reality we live in is that crime happens and doing that only encourages it. Same as leaving your car door unlocked with the keys in the ignition.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:49 AM
1

Exactly, despite more advertising and access to porn/games, etc... violent and sexual crimes are dropping.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:34 PM
1

I'm just hesitant to get into a No True Scotsman fallacy by assuming a chick shes not a true gamer.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 06:32 PM
3

I wouldn't say they don't count, just that they are vying for attention. Similar to a guy being overly loud and masculine at a gym. It's just that games have fewer women and thus competition. So an average girl will get much more attention from the guys then if she was to do other hobbies that have more women. Look at that Olivia Munn chick, she is a horrible actress, but is reasonably attractive so get's attention for modeling say cosplay outfits, but if she did normal fashion clothes, no one w…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 06:23 PM
1

Yea, after that Bayonetta review you might be right. She harped on the game,m without ever actually playing it, and people called her out.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:23 PM
3

Hell half the shit she whines about is not even disagreement, it's just some random internet troll.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:59 PM
1

Exactly, it's not some cabal of game devs trying to think of new ways to oppress women. Companies make what sells, want more girls to buy games? Stop telling them they are BOY TOYS. You could make the same comparison with Barbie. Who are they marketed to? Who buys them?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:59 PM
8

Same here and as he points out, it's a matter of if she can play. If anything that's a problem for many women, they don't get special treatment without advertising the fact that it's a girl playing.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:57 PM
1

So basically if we just redefine things on an as needed basis they exist! STFU apologist
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:07 PM
1

A) Don't care B) Not in the way people often refer to it in these sort of cases. Saying we need to segregate men and women because Rape Culture is not the same as what you said.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:24 PM
7

THis whole rape culture crap really is just fabricated. Only thing ever cited to support the claims are just troll youtube comments and the like.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 01:19 PM
4

Let's be honest here people, this is a defense lawyer talking. She deserves a defense as much as anyone else, of course they will say w/e it takes to get their client off. It's the same deal as when a rape accuser is being question on how they were dressed or if they drank. No one likes the implications being made, but it can be a viable defense, and in the end that is the job of the defense lawyer.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 08:04 PM
1

Yea, often the forensic evidence involved can often be explained through other non-rape sources. The scarring around the vagina, DNA, etc... can all be explained through rough sex or certain positions. Doggy style for example is really common and has the same kind of scarring pattern. At the end of the day, if two people have sex and one claims rape and other says it was consensual, all you really have is that there was sex, the rest is just a he said/she said situation. It sucks but that's kind…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:42 PM
1

TBH I kinda wish something bad would happen from an SRS doxx... That'd be enough to possibly implicate the Admins since they have through action condoned such acts which brought about the harm of a user.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:22 PM
2

Yea, though he's had GF's before that. This was back in 2011, and the pictures were from even before then.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:12 PM
2

Not officially... He had a GF at the time who he was of course having sex with, took some pics and they got out.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:07 PM
2

Na, it's any big sort of scandal event. Bananagate, when TJ Kirk had some adult pics of him released. Who is he? a random youtuber, but it's a GATE!
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:03 PM
3

Rebecca Watson and... "elevatorgate" Long story short while at a convention she was either waiting for or in an elevator with a guy, and he asked her out to coffee, and she went batshit crazy on him, calling him a rapist and misogynist. Richard Dawkins got involved and told her she was overreacting and to chill, so she labeled him a rape apologist. Shes also said such gems that SRS is the only worthwhile part of Reddit, and that /r/MR, /r/Atheism, /r/Skeptics are all misogynistic and rape apolog…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:48 PM
1

I call mine Fred.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:06 PM
1

I understood that referance
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:05 PM
1

Isnt something like 50% of the population positive for herpes, they just don't show symptoms and are strictly a carrier?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:14 PM
3

So... Why in the DC universe does Earth proper never seem to develop interstellar spaceflight despite the Justice League having access to the Javelin spacecraft?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:32 AM
40

Gotta love how anti-women that equality is.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:45 PM
2

When I was a kid and a handjob ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:46 AM
28

A Facebook Feminist appears! OP uses logic It's not very effective
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:23 PM
16

Both Right and Left have their radical elements. It's just the left radical are much more socially acceptable. A Right Radical might say that we should discriminate against black people because they do not contribute. A Left Radical might say that we should discriminate against white because they contribute too much.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:19 PM
1

Well that in a pussy pass... Men want affections from women, thus men won't call out women for crossing the line because to do so would mean no chance of affections. Women don't have to do this as they are being pursued and basically just have to "show up". Look on any online dating site or bar/club. Women by and large do not initiate anything. "I'm going to sit here and will have a stream of men come to me to be judged" Perfect examples are whiteknights that must come to the aid of even the mos…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:33 PM
3

Go look at /r/Feminism, you have to be a Feminist to submit an item or make a parent comment on any item. Does not matter what you say, if you're not one of them, you are not allowed to be heard. Compare that to here, we don't care who you are, if you post dumb shit it'll be called out and downvoted, regardless of if you're a MRA or Feminist.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:29 PM
2

And yet, where is the prosecution?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:27 PM
6

Quite common, people who have minimal income all of a sudden get a windfall of money. (Also see professional athletes and lotto winners) They start spending money on luxuries, buying houses, cars, etc... not thinking about the long term impact. You could buy say a Ferrari for a mere $200k, but they also require around $30k/yr in maintenance and upkeep, but that's not considered. And you now have your Mother, Brother, and Second Cousin twice removed now hitting you up for money.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:25 PM
14

Jezebel already beat you to it earlier today.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:21 PM
16

Either that or any Feminist who gives them a bad image is not a True Feminist.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 03:50 PM
3

Exactly... why do we have to be the ones to be better at this sort of things? Often times it's exploiting these draconian methods that highlight the absurdity of them.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:19 PM
1

I think it's the resolution, its done in only 240; she has other ones done in higher res and they look better.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:31 PM
7

If we say it three times, we'll summon her!
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:25 PM
14

It's a shame that the only real defense is gross stupidity on the part of the accuser in these cases.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:21 PM
2

Yep, all those judgments are paid out by the show, but I have always wondered, wouldn't that incentive the arbiter to award the least possible?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:12 PM
1

Sorry I don't follow... If AA laws favor women, wouldn't it be less risk to hire the woman as if you did not she could sue and claim discrimination?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:54 PM
14

You mean loser salt! He needs to buy a Himalayan salt brick!
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:06 PM
66

Salted Bananas are the best!
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:43 PM
21

Yea, I'm sorry but what is the complaint? That she was not "objectified" while being offered a seat?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:22 PM
4

activist =/= feminst
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:29 PM
34

Looks like she was a leading women's activist which modern feminism has turn on her for not holding up the common dogma. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhliqceyoL8 ... on the banners it said all men are bastards, all men are rapists, and I went down and said to the police; if that was black men or Jews you would arrest those women but why don't you arrest [stammer] felt very uncomfortable and one of them said that w're frightened of them I remember hearing how despite opening the first domestic …
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:52 PM
1

I never said they were pro-male, just that both sides have their extremist elements. Exercise some reading comprehension next time.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:43 PM
4

Exactly... I'm not turned on by gay men, that does not mean I am a homophone.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:32 PM
1

Times change, there was a time when the KKK was as big a moment.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:26 PM
1

Yes and the inverse is true, groups like Focus on the Family help as as political bodies and are paid by the Right.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:41 PM
1

Yes and the inverse is true, groups like Focus on the Family help as as political bodies and are paid by the Right.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:41 PM
1

Glad to see the comments and tearing into her for writing such crap,and well before it got posted here.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 03:18 PM
2

Personally I would qualify that by saying the "extreme left". They often share the same dogmatic and uncompromising attitudes that many from the far right will, just about different topics.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 03:06 PM
3

Who the fuck thinks like this? People who are conditioned that they have a "get out of trouble for free card" that can be used as much as they want without any repercussions. Fail a test? RAPED Caught cheating on husband? RAPED Lost dog? RAPED Regret one night stand? RAPED
/r/MensRights04/04/13 03:03 PM
6

Seriously, I only ever really it see it coming from women. Men seem to across the board like women who enjoy sex, dress provocatively, etc...
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:50 PM
6

Most people who don't have money then are met with a windfall of it, don't know how to manage it and spend it all. Friends and family will wants stuff like nice cars and houses; but don't consider the upkeep costs/taxes. I forget which one but I think it was a Ferrari will require around $50k/yr just in upkeep miant costs, due to how specialized it is. Special oil and fluids, special parts that need to be replaced like every month, etc... So yea you can buy one with your initial money, but you w…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:27 PM
8

Yea, all for equality, except where it's not helpful to women.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:39 PM
15

Yea, others who worked with her basically backed up that she was a bully in the office.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:56 PM
6

"WHITES ONLY" was the more common term at the time. I.e. Who would get to park closer to the building, whites.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:18 AM
1

damn didn't know he was that tall... 6'5" https://www.google.com/search?q=Dwane+Johnson&aq=f&oq=Dwane+Johnson&aqs=chrome.0.57.2528&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&q=Dwayne+Johnson+height&spell=1&sa=X&ei=ES1WUbL2CITl0QGsuYCYDQ&ved=0CC4QBSgA&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44442042,d.dmQ&fp=f4454e46a2fde8bb&biw=1097&bih=554
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:09 AM
86

Now... change that to say WHITES instead of Women and see what happens.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:33 PM
1

So... what? Will dropping $15,000 on a wedding and ring somehow magically solve all my relationship problems? I can make commitments to people without going into debt.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:31 PM
2

Exactly my point... Quit your job, have money, and devote your time to exercise and working out and you can pretty much look like the models you see.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:29 PM
5

Now you're just BSing. Half and sometimes fully naked men with desirable bodies, and you're telling me it's NOT for the sexual benefit of women? I don't suppose you're in the market for a bridge?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:12 PM
2

Yea, any woman could be a size 0 model with DD tits, all she needs is surgery, a personal trainer, and the time to devote 90% of her day to exercise.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:45 PM
9

While in name, I think you need to also consider the audience and purpose.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:43 PM
1

Joe or the nerd?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:19 PM
1

Liked the show, never seen this guy before.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:14 PM
8

Well that's kinda the nature of the crime involved. Certain position and rough sex can look very similar to rape from a forensic standpoint. So too often it does come down to a he said/she said. So really in that it's what is more important, the possibility of false conviction or giving into a person's word.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:44 PM
34

Yea, the trolling and excuses made for the recent high profile rape cases was a problem, but at the same time we do have to question the accuser, technically it's on them to prove they were raped; that might be cold but that is the reality.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:35 PM
125

It's also shit like this that makes the whole victim blaming mentality of rape cases so difficult to deal with. It seems like you are expected to automatically assume they are truthful, but if you question their credibility you're the bad guy.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 03:00 PM
1

YEa, simply put there is more cogs to work with when it comes to women. It's more complex and easier to disrupt. With men, it's been an all or nothing deal.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 02:06 AM
3

What I don't get is do people not understand about internet trolls? Same thing with that Anita Sarcasian chick, and Rebecca Watson... OMG DEATH/RAPE THREATS! No, those are called trolls, they are trying to get a rise out of you and you made it worse by giving them attn. I am so sick of these people feeding the trolls then crying "woe is me" when they get such threats.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 07:39 PM
-6

Please don't let this be a thing... Look SRS is literally HITLER!
/r/MensRights26/03/13 05:51 PM
5

Child/Father needs a restraining order against the Mother. Fucking runs away with him when he's in need of treatment for a tumor; pretty sure putting your child's life in danger is enough for CPS to get involved.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:01 PM
2

Except the forking joke wasn't actually sexual. Adria took it that way because she did not hear it and ASSUMED it was sexual.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:49 PM
-1

You're delusional if you think 80% is conservative and that men losing 50%+ their assets is a regular occurrence.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:53 AM
4

Yea, it always seems like it's the upper middle class women, easy time with college tuition, etc...
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:21 AM
54

It's amazing how Feminism seems to require you to accept certain dogmatic beliefs without any real evidence and are above reproach.... Kinda reminds me of another belief system...
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:14 AM
1

Yep, full time nanny will run you at least $500/wk.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:11 PM
2

Was it also appropriate for her to post public sexist jokes, and racist remarks before and after the incident?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:05 PM
2

It does seem that way when you are expected to take this one position without evidence and are not allowed to question it. Sounds a lot like another dogmatic system...
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:57 PM
2

And under that, does it say "Raising a girl not to be a cunt" Yea, didn't think so...
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:30 PM
1

I thought it was that Atheism+ crap?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:21 PM
10

Also she was herself telling the same jokes, as well as even worse racist comments publicly on twitter.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 05:45 PM
23

Not only that but her entire job was to be a PR person and attract developers. Instead she alienated them. She was fired for incompetence.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 05:44 PM
1

DJ is gay?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:42 PM
1

When she tried to play the victim card to a gay man, that was when she lost the last shred of credibility and threw her "I'm not attending" tantrum. To which the collective response was "oh darn". Got more on that bit? I never heard about this gay man.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 11:46 AM
1

Just grab em from Reddit someplace.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 11:46 AM
6

Not it wasn't the TSA joke was done at the same time as the con was going on.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:53 PM
10

Not just past, during that same convention. It's cool for her to make public dick jokes, but others are not allowed to make them in private.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:43 PM
34

Well she got banned from TAM that time for getting pissy with DJ Growthee... Something about if they want to have her attend they need 50% female attendance and a women's safe space. DJ told her to walk
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:48 PM
4

The abort button does nothing!
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:47 PM
95

Also he fails to mention she herself was making public dick jokes on twitter at that same convention!
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:34 PM
2

So totally saying this next time we fork. Keep an eye out in GW.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:02 PM
7

So now all speech, even private speech must be regulated based on people eavesdropping nearby? Better be careful with what I say the next time I'm forking my GF.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:46 PM
5

Except you're conflating the situation. From her account she was eavesdropping on a private conversation, and didn't even get the whole context. Instead of telling them to shush or doing ANYTHING a reasonable person would do, she takes a pic blasts it on Twitter and whines again publicly via twitter to the event organizers.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:57 PM
11

Standard professionally offended There are people who basically look for stuff to be offended by, and try to hype it up when they find something.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:48 PM
9

She was eavesdropping on a private conversation then without context went and shamed the men and had them removed from the convention, all the while herself posting public dick jokes and racist comments. It may not be illegal but I cannot see Siteground having her as a Representative.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:43 PM
13

She overheard two guys at a developer convention telling a private immature dick joke (forks and dongle) and decided to take a pic of them, shame them on twitter and have them removed from the con and one guy got fired over it.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:41 PM
2

YEa, something personal as in being ostracized from his immediate "coworkers".
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:13 PM
0

TBH I think what's really hurting them is that they are not supposed to report such stuff. Man reports it and it'll at best be ignored.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:42 PM
2

Could you clarify on why you find it annoying?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:41 PM
2

I wonder how it relates to research money too. Lots of money going to Breast Cancer, but a far smaller amount gouing to testicular or prostate.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:24 PM
7

Of course that 95% include those cases that cannot be proven to be false either. Much harder to prove an accuser is lying, unless they blow it themselves.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:05 PM
1

It's amazing such people can operate in real life. Normally they'd be counted as having some sort of mental illness that needs treatment and therapy.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:14 PM
3

Work it backwards. They prosecute the ones that do it, and only prosecute two a month; therefore they are prosecuting 100% and thus we don't need to worry.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:11 PM
2

So would that also mean that they are claiming to prosecute 100% of false rape claims, sounds like it'd be pretty easy to disprove.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:02 PM
5

Yep, in the EU they wanted 40% of board members of companies to be women or else face penalties. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/nov/14/eu-gender-quotas-upto-member-states
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:10 PM
4

YEs, fisherman is a high mortality job that is also mostly men, thus men see way more workplace deaths then women. Just swap out the job for most on this list.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:34 PM
3

Yes, emotionally motivated mob rule, such a great way to model justice.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:37 AM
14

Well it's cool for them, because it's how they FEEL, not what actually happened. If you self identity as having been raped by some guy across the room then you were raped. Doesn't matter that he never got within 10 feet of you.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 08:13 PM
26

That female, is Elevator-gate Rebecca Watson herself.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 08:12 PM
9

Any idea why they had who they had as paternalists? I hear it was Watson and Adrian Chen, two of the most Anti-Reddit people you could think of.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 08:11 PM
14

It's largely just BS. Their claim boils down to not enough females are contributing to Wikipedia, even though it's open to everyone. Same thing we see with women in STEM/IT fields. When they are young girls they are taught that Lego's, Computers, Model Rockets are BOY TOYS, then grow up to not have an interest in those fields.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:58 PM
3

If she willingly consented to it, then she still willingly consented and the consequences are her responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:25 PM
1

It's in Ottawa and from the comments it does not sound entirely legal. Even if they can fire him, it looks like he's entitled to pay.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:23 PM
1

Especially since she cited him as the author. God forbid OP suffer any possible threats or harassment from this.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:01 PM
11

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/05/catherine-comins-actual-quote-about.html "Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar, also sees some value in this loose use of 'rape.' She says angry victims of various forms of sexual intimidation cry rape to regain their sense of power. 'To use the word carefully would be to be careful for the sake of the violator, and the survivors don't care a hoot about him.' Comins argues that men who are unjustly accused can sometimes gain from…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:14 PM
10

It's the same logic behind rape laws. Make it so men cannot be legally raped, then show how men are never raped, to support why such laws are not needed. Or pass laws saying men are always the aggressor in Domestic Violence, then show that we don't need such laws changed as men are always the aggressor.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:18 PM
11

fucking site just makes up shit. Even wrote about me once, and made up a bunch of crap that I never told any reporter.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:09 PM
9

Yea, it's amazing how they keep spouting off about how men should be grateful for false rape claims, then wonder why women flock to MRM in ever increasing numbers.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:01 PM
10

Maybe not so much as planned as "Hey, this will really show those misogynists!"
/r/MensRights08/03/13 01:00 PM
7

Problem with laws like this, is they only work when they are enforced. Who is going to risk their career to enforce this law? That's why you see many people from law enforcement not enforcing the laws against demographics they want to garner the vote from. Start prosecuting women and expect to see them vote for the other guy when it's election time.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 01:41 PM
7

Sad that there are people who think that way. Make it so felons cannot own guns, and we wont have any more gun deaths.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:15 PM
7

I contested it so far as I could without having money for a lawyer. They ended up dropping it once they could not show anything as proof of me actually being a father.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:29 PM
19

Surprisingly annoying since they kept insisting I had kids. Ended up having the cops come with a warrant; of course they were never able to produce a birth certificate or any other paperwork.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:21 PM
8

Well don't forgot the common quote being passed around recently: "Women are the real victims of war" Because you know... losing your brother is way worse then losing your own life on a battlefield.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:38 PM
24

I've had CPS called on me, and I don't even have a kid.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:22 PM
2

whoosh Do you really think it takes some giant 200+ yr old building to be a government? The most basic purpose of government is for protection, when members band together to entire their protection then it's a very basic and rudimentary government. You're rebuttal is to cite examples that just serve to reinforce my point. Groups of people banded together for the protection of themselves and others from a common foe. Not to mention you're thinking too black and white. Few people WANT to be the ba…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:31 AM
3

Just look at any recent natural disaster. All the looting Also there does not need to be more criminals, just enough to take on their targets. Otherwise you'd have a band of criminals roaming around, and all the non-criminals either being robbed by being on their own, or they would form some sort of group to protect themselves and their belongings from the bad guys, but they'd probably need to fund this group for weapons, ideally better ones, that's going to take money and well they only got the…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:44 PM
5

Fallout 3 reference to a childhood "gang" in the vaults. http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Tunnel_Snakes No idea why THAT was the bit that caught on.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:15 PM
4

Tunnel Snakes FTW!
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:03 PM
20

Sounds good... now hand over your money and belongings or else me and my buddies will kill you.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:43 PM
8

It's a "w/e we want at the time" situation. When talking to Men they are oppressed. When talking to Transwomen they are Elites who have worked hard for their place.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:20 PM
13

Yep, I remember reading about how some RadFem was going on about TransWomen were trying to horn in on the whole Women's Rights, by getting the benefits without being real women.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:16 PM
3

OT... Regarding the credit, look into a prepaid card. You give them say $200 and they give you a card with a $200 limit. That way if you welsh they keep your money as collateral to pay for your debt. They are available to anyone who can front the money.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:08 PM
6

Yes, but those are often not things that the mass public need concern themselves with. Asians do not need to worry about giving birth to a soulless Ginger. Native Americans have a higher incidence of lactose intolerance. etc...
/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:05 PM
5

Fuck the article, the comments laying into her are golden! She just keeps digging herself deeper and deeper. EDIT: Oh so seems hes closed off commenting for anyone who is critical of her.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:51 PM
1

Since wen does the age of the recipient matter in CP cases?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:06 PM
8

The rationale is that by removing the consumers then the businesses that make the CP will go under. Problem is most producers don't do it for money. Same deal with prosecuting the Johns of prostitution but not the women.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:05 PM
15

I know it supports it for things like backpacks and lockers, but a school can't force a student to strip naked and be searched. A phone contains a lot of personal info, what if they found some medical records? That's be a violation of HIPPA.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:03 PM
2

Exactly, but what does the message matter when in the end, women get off for crimes that they would otherwise be punished for?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:01 PM
5

Even worse is if it's made criminal and they have to register on the sex offender list.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:00 PM
2

Yea, does the guilt murders and drunk drivers feel not count when they commit their crimes?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:59 PM
1

I was referring to the Mods there.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:24 PM
42

I'm amazed it's not been removed. Normally stuff like that does not last long.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:44 PM
13

You don't need to date someone to be accused of rape.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:06 PM
16

rape as a suitable punishment. I wonder how they would feel if women who falsely claim rape were justly raped when in prison?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:57 PM
6

Well... that is kinda what a drum is made for, to be beat.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:38 AM
4

Master Race REPRESENT!
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:38 AM
82

oh can you taste it? That sweet sweet white, male, straight, cis, privilege... Also was anyone else's monthly privilege check a little short this month? How am I going to buy my privilege movies!
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:56 AM
3

I thought the issue with that was that it was a... BLACK man... Women are dainty flowers and we strong men must protect them from the evil that is the raping, thieving nigger! If a white guy did it i bet it'd be a shotgun type wedding with no criminal charges.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:17 PM
25

Reminds me of in the UK recently, where car insurance companies could no longer factor in gender so they raised the prices on females. Lots of female students came out of the woodwork to decry it as misogynistic and ask how they will ever be able to afford it. All the while the male students had to deal with it for decades.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:43 PM
1

Don't care if it is sexist, still made me laugh.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:18 PM
10

Also since men/boys are on average larger they should get the lions share at lunch since they will need the food more.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:25 PM
1

I agree, but more generally... She is a scammer that exploited a popular topic. I wouldn't even say shes spreading rad. feminism, if you check her vids she just goes off on w/e if convent at the time. I don't think shes ever said concretely what branch of feminism she actually ascribes to. Shes just an opportunist.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:51 PM
1

Now now now let's stay focused... So Rampart; Good or Really Good??
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:48 PM
3

Just like I defend "violent games" from attacks by idiots who think they're turning children and teens into murderers, I must also defend people's right to make shitty games as well, even if they promote either misogynistic or misandristic viewpoints. I disagree... Playing this game just like playing COD is not going to make you an abuser/shooter. But it is making light of a subject that should be take seriously. It'd be like if MS Flight Sim let you fly a 747 into the twin towers; or if the Wii…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:15 PM
4

Yea, I find most of those directory sites are really off, and or scams. Some will list wrong info and charge you to have it corrected. Or show an insanely high valuation so you'll pay them a lot to purchase the domain.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 10:43 PM
1

So... you have two dicks? and are a chick? AMA would love to hear from you...
/r/MensRights26/01/13 07:30 PM
1

No, but I gotta use some kinda of pronoun.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:10 PM
1

wat? I'm referring to women who are MRA doing it against male faculty.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:51 PM
2

Yes, that's what I meant. It would at best be distasteful to resort to such tactics, but I see no other way that would be as effective at bringing to light the obvious issues with such policies.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:42 PM
1

eatures of the male principle Sorry I don't follow... In this case the Dean is a woman.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:34 PM
6

Because being ruled by your emotions without thought can in no way lead to overreacting or misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:19 PM
3

But that's the whole point, we WANT them to decry these BS accusations. It'll only further highlight the issues with this system. If we setup these rules that basically bypass common sense and any sort of review, then when they start being used in a way that is somehow inconvenient to those rule makers they will either have to change them to exclude themselves (big red flag) or fall prey to their own creation. You cried rape against a professor, everyone knows he did not and this claim is BS but…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:17 PM
5

Or you know, the real world. I may be biased from being in sales, but at the end of the day, my employers don't care why the deal feel through, all they care is they aren't being paid so neither am I.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:58 PM
1

Well on the plus side at least he can still pursue civil damages even if the DA wont pursue criminal ones.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:41 PM
13

I come from a simpler time. I think I see the problem.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:38 PM
2

at COTWA we preach that it is never just to battle injustice with injustice I disagree, I think in certain situations the ends do justify the means. Sure saying you're taking the high road is all nice and all, but what matters in the end is the results.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:38 PM
1

Oh I agree, but I'm not putting my money on it.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:24 PM
0

it is? I thought it was still like the normal assault?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:23 PM
1

Granted this will only trivialize legitimate rape, but I can't see changing this kind of BS and also respecting it. Sometimes you just have to overload and spam a BS system/rule to highlight it's flaws.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:07 PM
-1

I think shes barking up the wrong tree. School is just following orders basically, from the higher ups at the Dept of Education. Sad but only thing I can see changing the situation is for MRA Women to start making BS accusations against school faculty. No one will give a shit about some freshmen college kid, but oh shit if it's some tenured professor.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:59 PM
39

You heard him guys, he's cool with physical assault if someones being creepy and annoying; which I feel he is being to me; GET HIM!
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:52 PM
22

Does not matter, I can be as much of an asshole as I want, hell that's whats so great about this county. I see assholes every day and I am one to others as well, but it's not against the law. Assault on the other hand, is 100% not legal.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:51 PM
3

I take it you never bothered watching the Youtube response she made to the student who said she was over-reacting?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 01:14 PM
12

I've never heard of Rebecca Watson You must be new here, she makes some BS blog post and riles up Reddit every month or so. Previously shes accused /r/Atheism, /r/Skeptics/, /r/MR and /r/Spacedicks of all being pedophiles, used downvoted troll comments to show how we're all misogynists and if you tried explaining the whole troll/downvote setup then you would be banned. Shes also an active SRSer. And most recently started feeding the trolls by making a big "woe is me" post about getting rape thre…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:55 AM
4

Well she felt she had been emotionally rapes because someone asked her out to coffee while in an elevator at a convention. Of course nothing actually happened, just that the guy asked her to coffee later, but seems that simple question is on par with full on gang bang rape.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:50 AM
6

Bullshit, shes the one that called out that youtuber who responded to her by saying she was a misogynist for daring to suggest she (watson) was blowing it out of proportion.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:46 AM
3

Both ends of the spectrum result in extremism and totalitarianism.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:32 PM
6

Ich Bin Ein Redditor!
/r/MensRights23/01/13 01:49 PM
2

Why does their even need to be a quota? Let women choose w/e career they want. Choose the best student/candidate for the opening. Why is no one suggesting women go into crab fishing?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:33 PM
1

but I refuse to go to the "women in IT" things. Wait there are events for this kind of thing?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:35 PM
21

And yet women hold some 27% of IT jobs, and we're being told they are not represented enough. http://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-progress/2012/06/20/stem-fields-and-the-gender-gap-where-are-the-women/
/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:39 PM
3

I wouldn't narrow it to just liberals. Really it's any extremist element with too much time on their hands and a victim complex.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:30 PM
2

Well the issue is when they say there is no need for a MRM, because Feminists already advocate for Mens Rights too! Except of course any discussion of MR in a Fem forums like here on Reddit will be met by officially sanctioned censorship.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:19 PM
3

Which is odd, since aren't most HR depts staffed by women?
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:48 PM
1

By any chance, you got a link for the painter story?
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:26 PM
7

Holy shit, that's near me... I had a similar thing happen to me. I was escorting this kid hone in the dark/rain and his mother called the cops on me for child kidnapping. Thank god for security cameras.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:21 PM
5

My comp is like that now. When I was hired on it was much smaller and you got interviewed by the manager you'd be working for, but now you have to go through HR which requires some three interviews. I put in for a transfer and they treated me like a new hire, even put me through a 90 min interview where at the end I am told they are not hiring for my city.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:34 PM
14

Worse, when they don't even know what they are hiring for. Like in IT positions where they want 6yrs of iOS development experience, despite iOS having only been out for one year at that point.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:13 PM
1

In my experience, women from foreign countries, especially south of the border are a lot less of a headache when it comes to the whole radical feminism thing. Why that is and the like I'm not commenting.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:33 PM
2

Well wasn't there something recently of Feminist groups wanting to regulate sex toy sales, suggesting that things like blow up dolls encourage domestic violence or some other crap?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:50 PM
11

Also on the otherside of that coin, are there Real Women and if so what are fake women?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:32 PM
24

Some random ass links i found: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=4241746&page=1#.UOXUXG-0LTo http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080204212846.htm http://www.statschat.org.nz/2011/07/01/do-women-really-take-more-sick-leave/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8534796/Women-take-more-sick-days-than-men.html
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:58 PM
2

Yea, always hated that line of reasoning. You should not feel bad about X, someone else has it worse. Someone, someplace will always have it worse.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:57 PM
12

Seriously with all the difficulty of "getting" sex, if a woman was a "slut" who enjoyed and wanted it frequently, I cannot see any man complaining. It'd be on par with someone saying they have too much money.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 06:35 PM
3

Because of shit like this: national crime statistics on rape included only assaults against women and girls committed by men under a narrow set of circumstances. Now they will also include male victims. Basically if you do a study on rape but exclude men as possible victims, of course it'll come out overwhelmingly that women are raped. Same thing with definitions that say penetration has to occur. Thus Men end up coming off by and large as the ones doing the raping.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:18 PM
1

Nope, does not look like she posted it, at least to her FB.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:40 PM
6

Obviously not but what OP is suggesting would take an unprecedented level of cooperation between retailers, CC processors and government agencies.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:29 PM
2

can they use it at an ATM? EBT is not like that, thus why people will try and scam the stores to give them cash for stuff, or "sell" the card.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 04:06 PM
15

How you figure? Nothing stopping a women using her own money at the bar. Child Support is meant to support the child, not spent on booze for the mother. It's no different then not being able to to use the EBT card on liquor.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:55 PM
4

IDK why why a bar would even be allowed to accept it. It's intended to be used for the child, so when would a child (someone under 21 obviously) ever need to buy something from a bar?
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:53 PM
12

I think because "child support" is so broad it'd be hard to limit it in such a way. Clothes, medical supplies, food, toys, movie tickets; all could be seen as being intended for the child.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 03:52 PM
1

Exactly, it's the same setup as "theory" the ley term and scientific terms are completely different. Ley = Random ass idea someone thought up while drunk one day. Scientific = Highest level of explanation for a phenomenon supported my mountains of evidence and tons of scrutiny. People see radiation and think, nuclear bomb. Even though scientifically speaking the term is so broad it almost meaningless on it's own.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:25 PM
2

It's amazing how little people understand about radiation. I've heard people not wanting to microwave food for fear it'll make the food radioactive, despite wearing a beta emitter on their wrist. (yes I know it wont penetrate the glass/metal body)
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:15 PM
2

Yea, I would kinda like a followup of that... Does she think the solar radiation exposure from being so high up when flying a plane will fry your soldiers to the point of being infertile? If so, all those women wanting Tom Cruise's baby are going to be gravely disappointed.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:11 PM
3

Realistically he's just been pandering to Feminist organizations. Wage gap and all that jazz...
/r/MensRights27/12/12 01:07 AM
3

How is it blaming the victim if she was the one who committed the crime? Or do you mean the child itself is the victim? How far do we take it? Can a child be an excuse for any and all criminal activity? If not then what crimes can they be used for? If anything it's MORE important that she be rehabilitated. Shes raising a child that will mirror her beliefs, if she thinks it's OK to lie about rape, the child too will likely think that.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:32 PM
7

Maybe she should think about before committing a crime. Love your child? Don't do stuff that'll get you sent to prison.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 04:35 PM
11

I don't see how they are OK with imprisoning men who are behind on their CS payments, but let this PoS run around free, probably with even more debt.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:58 PM
7

Yea, looks like she was just "assaulted by a black Obama supporter", no mention of rape. http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2009/05/ashley-todd-mccain-volunteer-who.html
/r/MensRights26/12/12 12:57 PM
11

Obvious troll is obvious
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:56 AM
36

Women control 65% of all the wealth in the U.S THis one looks accurate: http://www.wlp.givingto.vt.edu/wealth/index.html account for 85% of all consumer spending Looks like it's a commonly repeated stat, but the WSJ didn't find much to back it up: http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/do-women-really-control-80-of-household-spending-1054/
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:13 PM
12

Yea, Jez wrote about me personally. I was denied buying a PlanB pill because I'm a man, which is 100% legal and shes not allowed to flat out refuse service. and Jez wrote the article and made me out to some bad guy harassing this poor Pharmacist, who I ended up getting fired because of her illegal action.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:54 PM
2

Most places will not allow you to sublet, and even then you have to have paperwork on file with the leasing office of who you sublet it to.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:29 PM
7

Yea, they mention about why not lower men and raise women till they meet in the middle. Much more profit to shaft women and raise them up to men.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:40 PM
21

While not in this press release, other news articles do get the Feminist perspective on how it's a travesty to them. One I recall had a female student complaining about how she'd not be able to afford her car with these new rates. Never mind all the male students who deal with it currently and have been for decades. http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2012/oct/05/car-insurance-women-rise-premiums-eu-ruling http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cars/article-1713810/Car-insurance-for-women-to-rise-25-on-…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:10 PM
1

Which are BS. So two people, living together have to pay more taxes; then two people living together who also took on a few grand in debt and bought a rock and metal ring?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:09 PM
6

Realistically speaking, why get married to begin with? It's not like a ring will magically solve any relationship woes you may be having. Seems by and large people marry, because either they thing it's a magic bullet and will solve their issues, or it's just that thing you're supposed to do.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:39 PM
22

I'll just leave this here: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,157165,00.html "Comins argues that men who are unjustly accused can sometimes gain from the experience. "They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Those are good questions."
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:36 PM
14

YEa as I recall, she got them to release his frozen sperm and got herself inseminated and sought child support, AFTER they were divorced. Went to court and Judge ruled the sperm were marital property and thus he should be liable for the support.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:05 PM
3

If the doctor or his office are going to lie to him, I wouldn't go to them even if they they agree to perform it.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:01 PM
2

Find a new doctor I had one done as a single person and they never even asked about my status. Just that I was sure and had insurance.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:00 PM
1

So not to be THAT guy, but I could not find a reference to this proposal aside from stuff leading back to the DailyMail. In goggling the names and references to this proposal does not lead me to anything, other then blogs all linking back to DM.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:01 PM
3

Was it even enclosed, Only ones I heard saying that were Watson and her knights. Everyone else from that time said it while the two were waiting at the elevators.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 08:14 PM
54

Of course most of those "creep" incidents could be easily resolved by the man, if he would just be more attractive and have more money! It's obvious the Patriarchy is not wanting to do it's fair share in getting women men they want!
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:25 PM
9

[engage circlejerk factor 10] It really is amazing how close the two resemble each other. In each they are staunchly opposed to any dissenting opinion. If you hold one then you are ostracized and accused of being "one of them" (heathen/misogynist). They want a homogeneous society tailored to their own philosophy regardless of what the actual doctrine may say (Do unto others/Equality for all). Both practically speaking want a class based society where one group has greater power over another. And…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:06 PM
2

That might work on a smaller scale, but in reality unless you instituted some kind of mandatory fucking it wouldn't work all that great. Young people now and days are having less children, they just don't have the same motivation to clown car a family before they're 30 like the older generations did.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:17 PM
1

Male sexual assault is always played for laughs in the mainstream. Stupid man, shes a hot chick fucking him, he should be happy!
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:36 PM
3

That right there should have been enough to get an appeal or new judge. Clearly the judge is not showing reason or justice if he thinks that way.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:35 PM
3

I thin kit has to do with child welfare and development. Better for their psychology and the like to minimize major life changing events and the like. Of course no one gives a shit about that if the parents were still together.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:16 PM
23

Justification is that the exwife and child are entitled to remain at certain lifestyle level, and it's not right to make them live something less. Same reason male rape victims and non-biological fathers are made to pay CS. It's in the interest of the child, therefore you have to pay. Of course if they had stayed together and he had less income everyone would then be saying they are SOL, and to tighten the belt.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:00 PM
13

Sort of... They basically took EVERYONE, including women who were stay at home mothers, part time workers, etc... and then averaged all their salaries.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:57 PM
160

And may in the long term be the only thing keeping OP out of jail. Granted he comes back he'll be jailed but if he stays away he'll be free and clear.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:11 PM
19

All those IT jobs are categorized really poorly. They'll take some level 1 GeekSquad guy and lump him in with someone whose a veteran network admin.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:10 PM
50

Sad to say, but I agree. OP needs to just take everything he can get his hands on and leave the country. Of course it'll mean you can never come back for risk of jail. Same thing happened to Dave Foley. He's required to pay more then he earns and cannot return to maple syrup land as he'll be jailed.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:08 PM
4

Exactly... If they are together, everyone sasy SOL< that's life; and expects them to cut back. BUt if for w/e reason they are divorced and decided they no longer want to be together, then she is somehow more entitled to his propety more-so then when they were together.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 11:10 AM
4

YEa we just renamed them. You're not going to jail for failure to pay, that's against the law. You're going to jail for contempt of court. Which is A-OK!
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:55 AM
10

Well that is how they justify most CS. Best interest for the child that they remain in an environment they are accustomed to. Thus they and the mother since she has custody will own the house you the man paid for.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:46 AM
10

IF you read into it, it was both. They just simplified it for the headline.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:42 AM
5

SO do you disagree with the bus driver that was being attacked? Or the trans-woman who was being dragged around that McDonald's by her hair?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:40 AM
31

I doubt it would fly. I mean the whole system of child support or alimony is BS in that regards. Maybe it made sense back when women were property and had no real job prospects, so a husband could trade her in for a younger model, and leave her high and dry; yea then she'd need some protection. But now that women have the same opportunities as men, why should we still treat them as property? (really we don't unless it something they will directly benefit from) No hitting girls; they can hit you …
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:16 PM
44

Same deal gets trotted about when people want obscene amounts for CS. They claim the kid has become accustomed to a lifestyle therefore he has a right to remain in that lifestyle now that the parents are divorced.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:45 PM
52

And if the two had remained together, and he had that loss of income they would have had to acclimate to the now diminished life style.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:44 PM
19

Dude was making $1m/yr on a prime time TV show, now he does stand up comedy. IDK about you but I highly doubt he's racking in the dough doing that. Also $500k is complete BS. No way could all they money be spent on the child unless they were in dressed in gold fabric clothing, eating from gold utensils, and attended top tier private schools their whole life.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:43 PM
2

I thought it was tow, like you're towing a load; the party want's to do X and you need to pull your own weight, tow the line.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:16 PM
29

Well yea, he's in what is effectively debtors prison. There is a reason we got rid of them centuries ago.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:17 PM
118

Sounds like Dave Foley the actor/comedian. He got an alimony judgement based on his time on the TV show News Radio; then it got canned through no fault of his own. Now his monthly alimony payments exceed his yearly income. Judge won't lower it because his exWife has become accustomed to her lifestyle and it'd be wrong to make her change. "But I'm literally obligated to give away 400 per cent of my income, or otherwise go to jail. "The judge even said, if I was paralyzed from the neck down, I wou…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:14 PM
4

Yea, let's see an excuse like that used in a drunk driving case.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:25 PM
8

Yea, they are very democratic and supportive, so long as you tow the party line. It's like how if you were a WASP or Aryan, and joined the KKK/Nazi party; you'd be among friends. Problem is the other 90% of the population who are not that.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:23 PM
8

Woudelnt that defeat the purpose? I am in a video showing me in a bad light. Hey everyone, that is me, but please don't tell anyone.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:20 PM
1

Look at M-F trans people, they get shit on by their then fellow Fems, because they are men shirking their privilege and trying to get in on the women's game.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:08 PM
1

I actually missed that, but I did see the ones where the Fems in that slut walk got onto a man for being there without a shirt on.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:33 PM
1

Exactly, let the offended speak out... Otherwise you're just being a busy-body, one of the professionally offended.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:57 AM
1

It may seem that way from the outside, but from within it's entirely normal. Look at any such zealotus group. Scientology, Mormons, etc...
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:57 AM
10

I posted it in the AskReddit thread yesterday: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101910603-157165,00.html Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar, also sees some value in this loose use of "rape." She says angry victims of various forms of sexual intimidation cry rape to regain their sense of power. "To use the word carefully would be to be careful for the sake of the violator, and the survivors don't care a hoot about him." Comins argues that men who are unjus…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:10 PM
5

If the sign said "White people working" We're talking about what is most succinct and effective to get the point across. You're whole position is that everything everywhere has to be 100% correct and PC about every facet. Here in the real world, we generalize about things.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:07 PM
8

It might not hut men, but it's something trivial to change and has a real cost in terms of lost labor and they had to get a new sign. Honestly if someone felt offended by this sign, THEY have the problem. You might as well ask why they label clothes at a Men's clothing store "Men's Size x", since it's theoretically possible for that store to sell both men and women's.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:13 PM
6

How is it appropriate in this context? There was only men, thus Men Working is the most succinct and descriptive way to describe the group. It's also an established standard that is taught by the DMV.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:50 PM
12

Is it just me, or do colleges seem to be getting hyper PC about stuff? It's like they have been taken over by the professionally offended, people who think it's their job to find something ,anything and twist it to be offensive for any hypothetical group.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:48 PM
9

Seriously, it was a perfectly apt way to describe the group. There was a group of men, who were working. I wonder what they would call two gay men in a relationship, vs. two women.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:47 PM
17

but but but... those are hard. Can't I just hit LIKE on my FB and take down the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:45 PM
8

Sounds like other such groups and movements. Look at MADD, they are now going after all kinds of stuff unrelated to drunk driving. I think at one point even tried to pursue a ban on porn. Founder of Greenpeace has condemned the current group leadership for becoming too extreme and that their initial goals were largely achieved.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:17 PM
6

Was having a discussion about that just yesterday. Seems rape is anything a woman feels offended and or uneasy; and false rape claims are good as it makes the man introspective and think about how he could have raped her, even if he did not.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:15 PM
0

Yea, god forbid they ever have to take a bar exam, hang a curtain on a bar, go shopping at Home Depot for an aluminum bar...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 02:18 PM
1

Yea, just commenting with regards to people saying he was drugged. Yea he was, with a drug that causes erections.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:35 AM
1

At the very least false accusers should face a penalty, right now it's almost SOP for divorces involving kids.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:34 PM
2

You think she or any woman who would make false accusation give a shit about what's good for the kids? The kids are nothing more then tools/weapons to be sued to try and hurt the husband who has apparently wronged her. The welfare of the kids will not take priority till she is facing the possibility of losing them, her lil weapons.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:33 PM
2

Sounds similar to the US. Being poor sucks, but often time it's a pseudo poor, where help services will factor your gross income, not net and as a result you wont qualify. Even though after court ordered and basic living expenses you're left with below poverty line wages.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:31 PM
5

Equality comes with a price sometimes...
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:08 PM
15

Apparently reading comprehension is not a skill they possess either... He was drugged with Viagra.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:57 PM
25

If you're a single heterosexual guy tied to a chair getting ridden by a hot babe with good personal hygiene and is on the pill and she stays away from the place where the sun doesn't shine, that's not rape. You're just ungrateful. That's it, I'm done...
/r/MensRights01/12/12 08:35 PM
1

And therein lies the issue. Guys want sex; guys always want sex. That's the mentality that gets parroted around, and as a result men cant be rapes since he was only getting what he wanted (speaking in a broad sense). Oh you got raped by this chick? Shes hot! Be a man and consider yourself lucky!
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:21 PM
9

People don't seem to understand the huge responsibility is is to take care of another life. They just think of how cute the little puppy/kitten/baby is and leave it at that.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:54 PM
4

Well I was hungry...
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:42 PM
2

Also their definition is what is used to charge people for crimes that send them away for life; and base research studies off of. Might as well question the relevance of the IRS and US taxes.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:16 PM
1

There are so many defenses one can take when addressing a rape case. Since forensically rape and rough sex are effectively identical; you can't really rely on materiel evidence.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:58 AM
1

But that's just it, the only time it does appears with any seriousness is in the court of law. If it's a He Said/She Said setup, the only real way to go is to attack the credibility of the opposing side. I've been raped! OK well you two have slept together before regularly, and shortly before the alleged rape incident you two had a domestic fight and you assaulted him. That's not Rape Culture...
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:46 AM
2

Yea, I would agree to that. It's so annoying seeing Fems cry RAPE CULTURE when a defense lawyer has to dig out and find a defense for an accused rapist. No one really thinks she deserved it, but it's the lawyers job to find some way to cast doubt on the accuser and get his client off.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:43 AM
351

It's based on the idea that "all men want sex", therefore consent is always implied; so if a woman rapes a man, he must have actually wanted it because he's a man.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:48 PM
3

How do you account for the fact that an accusation is a life sentence for some men? There was an article on here recently about a guy that was falsely accused but not convicted; and years later still could not hold down a job because people would find out and opt to take the safe route and fire him vs. risk having a rapist on staff.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 09:57 PM
5

Pretty much... More on it: http://www.avclub.com/articles/accuser-of-elmos-puppeteer-recants-his-recantation,88933/
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:03 PM
6

FYI he later recanted his recantation. He's also got a serious criminal history involving armed robbery. More info: http://www.avclub.com/articles/accuser-of-elmos-puppeteer-recants-his-recantation,88933/
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:35 PM
53

Hell record it all if you can. If shes willing to be that abusive, then she will lie when it comes time for custody.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 06:09 PM
9

Zero is just being pedantic. Realistically, unless you're someplace like Saudia Arabia, or banana republic it'll operate in a similar way. Man accused of [insert sex crime], news goes wild to spread it. Man found innocent because woman lied, news is silent.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:34 PM
3

OK so you're still out a job, you just got a payout.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:08 PM
1

Does not change the primary purpose of it was to find a husband to support her.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:57 PM
2

I think it's this one: http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/08/16/the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-so-over/
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:06 PM
11

Am curious how that usually goes down, you sue then get the job. Great you're now working for people who dislike you and want you gone.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:16 PM
3

For those curious... the ol' MRS degree Is when a college aged woman would go to college in the interest of dating and finding a husband then drop out, or take some worthless major and have him support her.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:12 PM
5

It's an acronym, short for "science, technology, engineering, and mathematics" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STEM_fields
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:09 PM
-1

It shows that some women have no issues with it and are creepy So by your logic, the KKK are not racists, because I am sure of all their membership I could find that one single guy that's not.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:32 PM
4

Easy... Go watch a movie with an underage lead girl, then walk in with that poster and yell about how you think shes is hot and want her; then let us know how fast you get kicked out. Fem supports women and their expression of sexuality towards a man, great, but also shuns it when a man also expresses his sexuality towards a women.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:12 PM
8

B) They are feminists Nowhere did I say those specific women are Fems. Just that if men were to do the same, they would have the police called. C) This attitude is broadly supported within feminism It is given how you see things sexualized by them. You have them saying men should be grateful for any sexual contact, painting men as border line rapists who can barely control themselves.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:07 PM
10

More like society has a double standard about women liking sex in public, vs. men liking sex.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:55 PM
6

Hardly, it clearly shows that women have no issues wanting sex from underage men. Look at the 50 shades series as well. Women love sex and society likes that they do. But oh boy if a man reads the same kind of material.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:55 PM
12

Yes, but it's one they themselves encourage. Example: http://files.myopera.com/JanetB/albums/933483/Twilight%20Moms.jpeg
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:20 PM
-1

Yea, while we're at it, lets go out for a three martini lunch!
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:15 PM
56

Therein lines the problem. Men are seen as sexual beings who want nothing more to then to be interacted with on a sexual level, with or without consent; they should be happy they got touched like that. With men it's seen as you giving them something they always want. With women it's you taking something that is precious. No one bats an eye if you give someone a gift they want, but if you were to take away a gift they wanted...
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:49 PM
6

Also I think there is a bit of exaggeration involved too. Fems will portray the roles like they are on Mad Men or something. Buddy Buddy guys in their office drinking martinis and sexually harassing their secretaries.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:20 PM
15

Look at TransWomen, some Fems cry foul as it's supposedly a man trying to shirk his privilege and get in on their game.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:08 PM
5

Now you know why all those rape stats are so one sides against men. Men could not legally be raped till this January per the FBI, and even now it's still classified as "Other sexual abuse" or some of genetic term. So when they pull reports, of course women come out as being victims of rape, even though when expanded men and women suffer it about the same. And there are laws that even require the police to arrest the man, regardless of circumstance. Is he on the ground bruised and bleeding, and s…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:46 PM
2

Also there are women only salons, I don't see anyone raising an issue with them not services men.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:38 PM
4

I do that, but more so because we only have the one car and work near each other and have easy access to public transit.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:37 PM
15

How can you live if you're wages are being garnished to the point that you cannot pay your bills?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:36 PM
7

Reminds me of many Theists, with their victim complex. Despite being in the majority they already cast themselves as the downtrodden under dog fighting against the big bad something. That's also why there is never a real end goal, there is always something else that is offensive.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:42 PM
2

I'm open to discussion of other peoples views.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:39 PM
4

Realistically, I expect SteelCrossx and myself to be ignored here and taken out of context.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:42 PM
9

Hello Author, you hate me and will always hate me. I can't speak for OP but I would say many people here don't "hate" you. No idea about any of the comments OP may have made or their content. Going just off what you wrote, could you cite some sources? Your definition does not match up to the recently changed FBI definition that previously required penetration, and now does not. Also your equating rape to sexual assault does not seem entirely accurate either, as many studies done on the subject s…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:44 PM
9

Guy: "Real women get in the kitchen." Oh but that ones sexist...
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:29 PM
3

I think it's because so often women are seen as the care givers, the ones who raise children. So working and having a job is just a part time thing you do in your spare time till you are ready for your REAL job. Whereas with a man, having that bacon job is his real job, so if he stays at home, he's shirking his responsibility.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:15 PM
0

Sound on par with my experience, I do it just because I like the way it looks.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:06 PM
3

We must know different ones, ones I know get steady work, and make more then I do with my FT white collar job :(
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:03 PM
2

Well look at male strippers, they make bank on those women.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:36 PM
1

Wish we could get the opinions of white men who were involved with the Black Panthers. I'd bet money they would be almost the same.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:24 AM
4

Never got that... I'm a strong independent women who doesn't need no man! OMG a man just asked me out for coffee, If I don't say yes he might rape me!
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:23 AM
7

Well in this case OP was specifically referring to minorities.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 12:57 AM
10

I would say that minorities can just as bigoted and hateful as anyone else.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 12:29 AM
15

I wonder how their views would match up to older generation's racism. Black men for a time were depicted as sex crazed animals, and white women warned not to approach for fear he might rape her on the spot.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:44 PM
28

Pretty sure if a guy went out in a dress he would get threatened and beaten up and end up with a situation like this See that trans person who was severely beaten at a McDonald's.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:39 PM
31

And middle school was the last time anyone cared about cursive.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 04:33 AM
46

Honestly, what is this fear of using the word no. I had to do X, because I couldn't say No.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:19 PM
7

No I'm not because even in marriage you need a partner. I do not have right to marry someone who themselves do not wish to marry me. Right to bear arms is something that I own of my own volition is something I could do without any outside help. If Could even go so far as to mine the ore, refine and make a firearm. I could not go and get a partner for marriage or childbirth of my own volition, I'll need someone's help somewhere along the way.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:07 PM
7

No... it's not. It's something you would require another partner for. Quite simply if you were in a position where no one was willing to be your partner, in order to exercise you right you would have to violate other people who exercised their right to not have a child with you. Your rights only extend so far as your body, if it requires the participation of others then it's not a right.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:13 PM
1

Exactly, telling something if they do X they can reduce the chances of [bad thing]. That's not victim blaming. Don't want your bike stolen? Lock it up Don't to get mugged? Don't flash valuables around strangers. Shits going to happen regardless and in a perfect utopia it wouldn't but we don't live in a perfect utopia and we need to learn how to live in the world we are in, part of that requires we acknowledge crime exists and how we can minimize it as best we can.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:06 PM
2

Did you not even read the very short article that as published AFTER the letter? "In almost all cases, we list hate groups at the end of each calendar year when we publish lists.I very much doubt we would ever list the Reddit [r/MensRights] in question—it's a diverse group, which certainly does include some misogynists—but I don't think that's [its basic] purpose."
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:36 PM
15

Tyranny of the majority
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:46 PM
7

Also the SPLC came out later saying that /r/MR is NOT a hate group, after the SRS attempt to get us labeled as one. http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-mens-rights-hate-group-splc/
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:03 PM
1

A pair of tits is pretty soft to lay on too :)
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:57 PM
3

It'd probably be cheaper for each student to pay for a license to that copyrighted PowerPoint then the class.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:15 PM
1

Don't think so, but they do disallow discrimination on certain select things.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:05 AM
12

Makes me wonder about other activities, like drunk driving. So being drunk while having sex is considered rape; but if you are driving while drunk then you are 100% responsible for your own actions?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:27 AM
1

Lately I have been going to this place called Stockyard BBQ, over on Westheimer. The rib meat will be so tender, it's just falling off the bone, dry rub too.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:00 AM
6

Except for all those unisex restrooms that already exist.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 10:17 PM
13

Well some people do see segregated restrooms as dumb.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:47 PM
9

For those curious, The Doubletree is pretty nice hotel, not luxury but if you have a chance to, stay there. Also in Hotel-Speak, and "extra pillow" means send up a hooker.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:43 PM
6

Same here, always on the lookout for new BBQ places, but i'll make sure and pass this one up. May also want to xpost to /r/Houston.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:21 PM
28

I wonder how it'd go down if they were charging blacks more, or even making them eat at designated tables, or use special entrances?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:18 PM
1

I disagree, fear sells just like sex. People know child predators exist, and they make news; so every time one is revealed they trump it up. I'm all for holding people responsible, I just think you're going a bit far in suggesting it some Machiavellian plot my Feminists; I am sure they played a part to some degree, but you might as well also blame people for not researching the issue more and looking at what the crime stats are.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 09:09 PM
3

Stuff like this is why police should not have immunity. If shit is mishandled to this degree then she needs to answer for it, it was abuse.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:56 PM
3

Personally I wouldn't even say it's just feminists. Stranger Danger is a big selling point for things like news; even though it's relativity rare. (Most child abuse is committed by a female family member) Stay tuned after these messages to find out if there is a child predator living near you!
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:55 PM
6

Funny how so many people think the opposite, Better to dragnet as many as possible to ensure not even a single person goes unpunished.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:52 PM
8

*and is easy on the eyes. Sucks but it's true.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:52 PM
1

Names I guess are fine, but in the heat of the moment you might call one out by accident or something. You'd also likely want more then just a simple THE END word as it were.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:24 PM
1

In years of play never heard a name used. Most common is the stop light system. Green = everything is cool, keep going Yellow = Slow down, do something else Red = The End, stop
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:12 AM
-1

All hail Romney!
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:11 AM
1

I would write it off as mere ignorance but when I approach these same people trying to pickup my partners and speak casually, I'll get ignored. Seems since I'm not a hot piece of ass, I'm not worth their time.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:42 PM
2

There are, but if she is a Bi or a Lesbian then she'll also be seen as a threat, they're cool if shes nice on the eyes, but beyond that, fuck her. When I went with two women, they were big hits and I was ignored. Hey asshole, do you not see the collar and leash I'm holding?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:49 PM
2

Personally I think a lot of that is reinforced by the BDSM community. All too often they see new Dom/mes as a threat. Last thing established members need is one more person to share possible subs with.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:14 PM
2

Yep, and for those who don't know dealing with neophytes in the BDSM wold it can be common for them to call red in the middle of a scene. (Enough is enough hand you are to stop regardless)
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:10 PM
5

It was in reference to the two parties agreed to have a kid and the man backed out after she became pregnant. Dual vs. Single income household
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:24 PM
4

While reverent I think that's a bit off topic. The mechanics of a child support system, would not really be covered by saying if a man should or should not be forced to accept custody. Should the man be forced to accept custody: yes/no If yes, should he be forced to pay child support? yes/no If yes, how much? How do we ensure that money gets to the child and is not squandered by a corrupt parent?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:18 PM
1

I'm sorry, I don't follow; you mean she picks up a random guy, gets pregnant, and demands CS?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:02 PM
49

Playing devils advocate here, the thing is if the women aborts, then there is no child; the end. If the man aborts then a women now has a child she previously could support with his help, but now cannot. Of course this is something both parties should have considered ahead of time, but at the end of the day there is a child that needs to eat. EDIT: of course this also brings up the issue where a man may want to be a parent and the women does not. Can he then override her wishes, since she may no…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:43 PM
1

Does that also include cost to the company? women use more medical services then men as a result they pay more and cost the company more to insure.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:53 PM
1

I liked it, but would have stuck more to the actual income. In all frankness, men are the majority in fields that are high paying or high risk. Practically speaking there is nothing really stopping a women from becoming a crab fisherwomen; just like how there is nothing stopping a man from becoming a secretary. Also as I recall the disparity does NOT take into account such things as different job duties, hours worked, etc... If I work more hours then my female counterpart who is exactly he same …
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:57 AM
2

But due to the nature of rape it can be hard to prove. Few cases can be solidly said to have a false accusation; mostly it's just a matter of not being enough evidence. Hell even when it's 100% false the damage has been done to the accused. We had a post here a few weeks ago about some guy, three years after an accusation still had trouble getting jobs because a quick Google search would find a ton of sources saying he was a rapist; and of course leave off the bit where it was done by an ex GF w…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:39 AM
1

Agreed, if it's ambiguous and is just he said/she said then don't, but if you got some emails where it was premeditated to accuse someone then yea, convict their ass.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:36 AM
3

No, she made a big deal, even made a youtube video calling him/the convention out on it. Then went off on some female college student who commented on the youtube video that she might be over reacting. Then the next years TAM (that just happened) she made some pretty outrageous demands on the organizers if she was going to attend and speak (50% female attendance and a Female Safe Space); and the organizers (DJ Growthe [sp?]) told her to take a hike. Then she told everyone she had a chance of hea…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:58 PM
2

Well part of the Skeptic thing is she often acted in a manner not representative of skeptics. She'd make a claim supported by a blog post, and anyone who posted peer reviewed government studies refuting the post would get deleted/banned.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:54 PM
2

I don't care what feminists say, their actions define them. Could not agree more. Too often I see the No True Scotsmen fallacy employed to excuse some bigoted and sexist behavior, saying "Well Feminism really stands for X, and since shes acting that way shes not a real Feminist". Of course the thing is all the people at the top act and feel that same bigoted/sexist way, and they are the ones who get to define the movement. It'd be like saying "The KKK is not racist because this single individual…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:52 PM
1

That's why I prefaced it with OT = Off TOpic
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:11 PM
1

OT: regarding the wedding ring, might I suggest something cheap. General the ring should be a symbol, and ideally the women won't care how many zeros the rock cost. Personally I am partial to more unique stuff, like a piece of meteorite instead of diamond; shit does not even occur on the whole planet!
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:44 PM
25

The narrator does not do Feynman justice. If you ever heard Feynman speak, he'd be a lot more subtly snarky. Still my fav clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMFPe-DwULM
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:40 PM
14

I thought the Wage Gap had some truth in that if you twist these statistics and include all this extra data then poof 77%! It'd be like without adjusting for inflation saying people in Zimbabwe are the richest people in the world.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:00 PM
2

So much Stranger Danger...
/r/MensRights31/10/12 09:43 AM
6

Interesting since so many of the lesbian relationships I know would be seen more as two women women.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:38 AM
6

But why target women instead of people in general who have an inclination to logical thought process and creativity?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:35 PM
2

I think you misunderstand... The policy itself is pandering; individuals who have to execute it know it's BS and many don't want to, but they have no real choice in the matter if they want to keep their jobs.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:20 PM
3

That's a bit presumptive. How do you figure? The regulation was passed down by the Obama administration during an election year, also shortly after saying that we need to fix the wage gap. http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201104.pdf Basically schools only have to say if an accusation COULD have happened not if it did or was likely to have happened. Under the new DOE regulations people accused of rape on college campuses will have no rights to confront their accuser, ge…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:47 PM
2

It's nothing but pandering, lots of people see the issues but since it's political motivated and we're in an election year no one is going to rock the boat.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:32 PM
36

For those curious the law is called the "Duluth model". Basically it's as OP describes, you arrest the man. the end Bleeding? Arrest the man Unconscience? Arrest the man Broken Bone? Arrest the man Bruised? Arrest the man The woman can even be activly hitting the man whose not fighting back and he'll be arrested. It's even been employed in pseudo-robberies, where a woman gets a man arrested on DV charges and proceeds to clean out his home, even though she does not live there, nor have her name o…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:53 PM
4

Yea, I remember reading about that a few months ago. If you're accused you're as good ad convicted as far as the schools care or are allowed to.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:41 PM
11

Texas is a one party state.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:40 PM
24

So... Why does there need to be more of X gender in Y field to begin with? So long as there is no sexism or discrimination, let people decide for themselves.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:27 PM
2

Yea, but what a rush!
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:50 AM
4

cluless Speak for yourself, I just got back from the doctor after overdosing on privilege.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:12 AM
24

He's also CIS too; gotta get all our bases covered. A Straight, White, Cis, Male!
/r/MensRights27/10/12 08:05 PM
107

Not just a man, but a WHITE man; she might have a hint of racism mixed in there too.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:51 PM
1

You can't sue because the school is following the law. You'd sue the DOE/Government.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:53 PM
8

According to recent directives to the DOE colleges are required to remove the accused regardless of later convictions.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:52 PM
3

It's like racist, all that's needed is an accusation, actions or opinions are no longer needed to qualify.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:11 PM
7

Actually I would think it'd be easier to say if you were not. If you already were, why would you want to rock the boat and upset an already good thing. If you're not getting it, then taking the stigma away from it and making it more casual would mean a better chance of you then getting some. It's kind of the opposite to the "I got mine, now fuck you" mentality.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:24 PM
9

As despicable as it is, also of note it's from the guys who brought us Jersey Shore.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:01 PM
9

Personally I think we put too much on sex, just treat it as a fun activity people do together and leave it at that.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:55 PM
18

I hate these mass protest things. I work in my cities DT where we get them like once a month and all too often people will get this US vs. Them mentality.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:30 PM
2

Well there goes any credibility you had... As a source you cite a 9/11 truther site that also accuses all atheists of being hypocrites.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:29 AM
1

Like the wife hounds the man to make him sign the divorce papers. See it in movies and stuff all the time.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:58 PM
1

ummm so why not normal /r/Atheism?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:50 PM
2

How do you account for Clinton/ Democrat Congress getting us a surplus? Also wars are expensive and Congress controls the purse strings. Bush started two wars and we've had a republican lead congress that in the interest of playing politics let the country's credit rating drop, and filibustered Obama on every fiscal measure he tried.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:37 PM
1

How does that work when people talk about getting the other party to sign the divorce papers, or not having the filed so they are still married?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:04 PM
1

Gotta love how with two seconds of thought his argument turned against him.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:00 PM
5

Are we leaking mod-chat transcripts and crying when we get banned for it? Nope. Come to think of it, w/e happened with that?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:39 PM
5

How is she not psychotic, shes saying she has to be power to inflict pain and voluntarily does it. Since when is at minimum emotional torture tolerable?!
/r/MensRights25/10/12 01:02 PM
6

Actually they love special rules, just look at her recent no show at TAM. DJ Growthe[sp] requested she not attend because she made outrageous demands if she was to attend. She wanted a special Womens Only Safe Space office and that there be at least 50% female attendees and speakers.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:50 PM
3

You do know A+ is an SRS affiliated subreddit; and that they are very pro-mainstream Femanism.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:48 PM
8

Pretty much... Now shes complaining about troll youtube comments; one would think an active SRSer would know about trolling.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:41 PM
1

Hardly, when I was attacked I had WN's suggesting that my assailant was the victim because I dared put up my hands to block her hits.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:01 PM
3

But also women can tolerate more pain then men.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:09 AM
23

More like we need the damn white knights to STFU, and stop treating things black and white.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:09 AM
25

IDK, I do have a right to defend myself if being actively attacked.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:08 AM
1

Never heard of the skin becoming callous like that. I know first hand there can be issues with sensitivity when circumcised.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 01:01 AM
2

Hey lay off it man, just provider a TLDR version for people who might not want to get so in depth.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:21 PM
2

Thanks, but TBH I thought I was pretty neutral. Cutting off part of the penis would reduce it, the merits of that though are debatable. (You could make the same argument about breast cancer)
/r/MensRights19/10/12 07:00 PM
7

Basically it's like was joked about elsewhere, you have less surface area for the disease to enter. It's like touching a small amount of disease in a petri dish with the tip of your finger, vs, taking a bath in the stuff. You COULD get it from both, but you will have less of a chance from the dish and finger.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:16 PM
5

Actually yes it can be "assault by contact".
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:47 PM
4

I had to unsub from there, they keep saying there is a storm coming but it's a clear day out!
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:01 PM
7

This sort of leads me to believe that "safe space" is code for segregation Exactly... that's all it is, and is why you only ever see it getting trotted out to remove any dissenting voices.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:54 PM
5

Uncle is a long haul truck driver and yea it is dangerous. He's been robbed and beaten several times.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:39 PM
2

Same here, we'll see it occasionally in some troll/downvoted comment, but that's about it.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:46 PM
0

But those acid burnings are illegal there. They happen like murder happens in the US, some minor groups say it's OK but the law says it's not. (spend two minutes on wiki) This kidnapping is itself a crime to run away from. It'd be like Mobsters forcing you to sign a contract against your will then having the FBI prosecute you if you welsh.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:28 PM
2

Can we get this on the sidebar?
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:05 PM
1

Yea, might as well say Games turn people into Murders.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:35 PM
0

da fuq! These 'grooms' are abducted, held captive and often beaten into submission before later being forcibly married, often at gun-point with a rope tied around their waist so that they can't run away. Subsequently, if the groom tries to extricate himself from the marriage, he faces lengthy legal battles and even criminal charges under Indian Dowry law, which is presently geared towards protecting the rights of women in the marriage, as in most cases the bride's family is financially strong an…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:32 PM
2

All I've seen is her acting and for me it's been rather hit or miss; and even then I don't think I have seen anything from her in over a decade. Wasn't she on The View at some point too?
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:36 AM
15

Why don't you like her? This is the first thing I've heard about her for the most part.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:15 AM
1

Sounds like he was suspended and will likely be fired. TBH it is rather justified, but to come to the defense of the women when she instigated it is BS.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:16 AM
1

Yea, that Cnyk fellow does seems a bit too preoccupied with sex.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:15 AM
1

And if I was to provoke a heavy weight boxer? Would you make the same suggestion when he eventually hit me? Also had he not ended it, and ended it he did; she might have been able to come back at him, possibly with a weapon.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:08 AM
1

Yep, totally normal really. If you're looking to fight someone of course you size them up beforehand. It just so happens this women was betting that he would not retaliate, and was thus not a threat.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 09:04 PM
6

And half the stuff they cover now is often on Reddit days before. Which would not be a big deal but then they leave out info that was in the original report. So when I see something original I have to wonder what got left out...
/r/MensRights13/10/12 06:25 PM
4

Yep, only reason that stuff happens is people allow it to. They think it's no big deal, because all they hear is "Don't hit women". So they assume it's OK for a women to assault a man. It's bordering on almost blind dogma.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:59 PM
2

Ok so we have a tank class, where is the mage class?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:55 PM
3

Sound about right, and like I said elsewhere they are surprisingly judgmental of other people's lifestyles. They had an episode on Furries a while back and were either cracking jokes about them, or saying they were mentally disturbed. (I think Ana might be kinky herself, since she said on air that she was fine with what they do and would do it herself if asked by a BF) They're progressive/liberal but only so far as you fit into their idea of it. So ya gotta be careful with listening to their opi…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:29 PM
3

They were right so far as that statement, but they also sided with her with statements that men should not hit women, and men who defend the driver are secretly wife beaters. They also used the video that does NOT show him hitting her, only hit you see is him hitting her. Why not show the others which give a better representation of what happened instead of one that fits the narrative?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:13 PM
2

Probably, but be honest they are pretty liberal, even joke about it on air. Of course I think OP is using it as a derogatory term so F him.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:11 PM
1

Yea, doesn't it have to do with the child birth of something?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:09 PM
7

Exactly, I mean strength should be a consideration when escalating an argument into a fight. A heavy weight boxer is going to be a lot stronger then me, but no one would bat an eye if I was yelling at him, then hit him; and he broke my jaw. We're both men even though the difference in physical strength would be much greater then the average man and woman; and yet women get this special protection that's justified by saying they are weaker, but you cannot use that same justification when it's sam…
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:01 PM
18

Yea lately their stuff has been getting a bit too Fox News-ish. And are far too critical of people's lifestyles. They had one on Furries a while back and basically made it sound like people who like that are mentally disturbed and sick.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:19 PM
12

I disagree, they are very much on the side of the women in this video. The male host even says at one point you cannot hit a women. As if it's some blanket statement, and suggests people who defend the driver secretly want to be wife beaters. I was in a situation like this, I got knocked down from a bus and hit my head on pavement and was bleeding. Would they have then declared her the victim? It sucks being in a position of knowing if you retaliate or defend yourself in any way you will be the …
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:17 PM
25

Not only that but there are other videos with a better angle of her hitting him. The entire report was custom tailed to make him out as the bad guy.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 02:49 PM
10

Yea, can't really see it, but either way that's the position the hosts take. She hit him, and he hit her back; ergo he's the bad guy, and shes the victim.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 01:58 PM
19

So TBH I like their channel but in the cases of gender issues they really drop the ball. The comments are unusually supportive of the driver.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:00 PM
0

Yep, it's a huge sham and I've hear it suggested was started by SRS, but that could just be a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:18 PM
3

Also I'd chalk #9 up there too... So it's not stressful when the mother is unhappy, only the father?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:02 PM
22

Admins only get involved when there is PR attn. Go get Cooper to do another expose and that'l light a fire under their asses till then they shall be an unmovable boulder.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:42 PM
1

Yea and one that just wanted an education, something that most of the western world takes for granted.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:22 PM
1

Isn't he a mod or something?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:05 AM
21

Because the Admins only get involved when they start getting bad PR. All those other equally or worse subreddits don't make the news so the Admins turn a blind eye.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:37 AM
16

There is speculation some of the Admins are sympathetic to SRS.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:34 AM
0

And for that I'd have a lot of legal recourse.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:40 PM
3

Yea, but if you're going to take that approach you could say anything about anyone. And is why users who make such claims should deal with libel suits.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:36 PM
3

What would they doxx you with? Saying that you're a MRA might get you de-friended on FB but I can't see it getting the same ire as posting incestuous porn pics of your own daughter.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:24 PM
3

Yea, too bad it was one of those $200 gaming ones.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:12 PM
5

Oh I agree, till one day I had the bottle open and knocked it over onto my keyboard.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:00 PM
10

trying to pry glitter nail polish off their toenails As one who wears nail polish, why does she not use remover? I have never had to pry polish off my nails. Just a lil remover or pure acetone and it'll be off no problem.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:45 PM
19

I don't think I agree with that, anymore then saying if a women did not want to be pregnant then she should have been on BC.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:35 PM
15

Yea and even if he is the father, allowed to get a financial abortion. If that leaves the mother in a hard position then she should consider that when deciding to give birth.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:23 PM
52

TBH DNA testing should be standard, and absolutely required when something like child support is being sought.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 08:19 PM
-1

Lies, Damned Lies and what was the last one?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:44 PM
16

I assume Ms. Bastow will be okay with my opening up a Men's Business Association where men can network without having to fear women abusing us either through outright violence or more subtly by making false accusations against us. Reminds me of that Men's Center at that college that tried to be opened and all the Fems objected saying it needed to be mixed while the Women's center did not need to be.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:40 PM
1

Exactly, we're not back in time when women had zero job prospects. We're pretty equal on being able to get a job that can support us now. Might not get some multi story house in a nice part of town, but oh well, that's life.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:51 PM
0

Exactly, it's not someone just making up some BS, they have data to support the practice.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:42 PM
1

Same here, I don't see it as objectionable if scientific/statistical data shows one group is a greater risk then another. A man working as a offshore oil driller probably should have a higher premium then some stay at home mom.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:40 PM
1

I disagree... Let's see an experiment done comparing such events to attractive vs. unattractive women and men. I'd be willing to bet money the attractive women would get the most offers for help.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:38 PM
1

But that's just it there are still inequalities imposed beyond norms. Look at say White Knights. They're saying two things: A) A women is not strong enough to defend herself thus I must intervene on her behalf. B) By me intervening I will gain her favor. This strikes me as being hugely sexist, but is socially acceptable, and not justified by mere biological differences.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:40 PM
1

keep the difference to a minimum? Why does X difference exist? If it's not because of a biological thing then it should ideally be something we can fix.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:23 PM
1

Yea, we're different by design as it were. We'll never be 100% equal but we can be more equal then we are now.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:17 PM
2

Maybe those men should grow a pair and stand up and say NO. No need to go into tens of thousands of dollars into debt over an exchange of vows.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:12 PM
-1

Yes, but in this case they broke up for that. Also while we are animals, there are a lot of animal instincts we don't act on or handle in a more civilized way.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:50 PM
-1

Same here, I don't gain really anything except liability if things go sour.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:56 PM
2

If he wanted kids and she could not have them, could they both not adopt? I never understood this need that if you're going to have a kid it must share your genetic material.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:55 PM
3

Can you not sue her for that? I would think it'd be clear to a judge what happened.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:54 PM
4

Sounds like she'll get whats coming to her: Jupiter Farms woman was being held without bail Thursday after she was accused of punching the 77-year-old driver of a truck into which she allegedly plowed her car. She faces charges of assault on a person over 65 years of age, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, burglary with assault or battery, and leaving the scene of an accident with property damage.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:32 PM
7

Which are covered by many insurance plans and when not will run a few hundred bucks, which will pay for itself when compared to years of condom purchases.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:17 PM
6

See I never got that, they want equality yes? But still expect men to cater to their needs/whims. When I'm carrying heavy stuff no one comes to my aide, and I don't expect them to. Why then do women then get to demand and expect strangers to help them, when they don't even ask; all the while saying they are equal and independent?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:05 PM
7

Right here dude... Helped a kid who was lost and alone outside while raining and as a thanks got accused of kidnapping and of being a pedo; and had to deal with the cops.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:03 PM
2

people let their hatred of child molesters get in the way of rationality. Yep, don't know how many times I've seen that gone down even here on Reddit.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:41 AM
2

It does not matter what COULD have happened. What matters in the eyes of the law is what did. She was mugging him and they helped her. the end You sound like a typical SRSer, and are trying to set it up to be sexist no matter what. Guys help her without question and it's sexist for them helping. And it's sexist for them to pay for the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:42 PM
0

So back up your claim. IS a gun a weapon because I can cite any gun safety school/class that will say if you aim a gun at something you should be prepared to kill it. It's actually the #1 TOP rule for the NRA on gun safety. Also police are taught to not only use them, something the average Joe is not, they are responsible for it's use or misuse and are trained to resolve conflict without using a weapon again something the average Joe is not. Had a cop been involved in the articles incident he li…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:56 PM
1

While we're at it Switzerland, where you can keep your select-fire assult rife after your service that the government gives you: Stop lying... While Switzerland does have the highest ownership, the number of people who carry and use them after service is much less. An are mostly service rifles, not the average handgun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Switzerland They're also big on punishments for misuse. Yet here in the US and other countries we'll do more testing on you to drive a…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:51 PM
0

Guns are weapons whose purpose is to kill. That's a plain and simple fact. They are not meant as a defensive measure.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:44 PM
0

Fine one for your supports suggests that the average citizen would have helped in that situation. At this point the only one who has provided any citations is me and they lead to the fact that tighter gun restrictions have a decrease in the homicide rate. And you're only reply is that it's somehow unfair to compare countries with longer history to the US, because they have not had access to guns for as long a period of time. Which makes no sense.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:40 PM
0

Tell that to all the people who are alive today because they had the means to defend themselves. Once again you cannot back this up. You know I'm right about my statement because it's what gets taught in every gun safety class. Guns are by definition a weapon meant to kill; they're taught this way, they're used this way. Hey I can do you one too, let's go ask the people who have been killed by guns. This while line is nothing but an appeal to emotion.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:36 PM
-3

But a car unlike a gun is not a tool whose main purpose is to kill.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:31 PM
0

Yea lets see the rates for those countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate In descending order of gun restrictions: Brazil: 20.1 US: 4.2 UK: 1.2
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:31 PM
24

I hope the idiot passers-by lose much more than thousands of dollars. They deserve to suffer monetarily. Aren't those the same?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:26 PM
0

Feel free to quote me saying that or anything even remotely close to that (hint: you can't because I didn't.) Go back and look at my post I quoted you. I really doubt that an armed audience would have made it worse, Show me a source or case study that suggests an untrained and armed panicking civilians placed in a situation like that theater which supports your claim. Comparing the US to a country that has had very limited gun availability for it's entire existence is hilariously nonsensical. I …
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:25 PM
-1

Generally speaking someone who buys a gun plans to use it. Ideally the people who should own guns are the ones who would NOT want to use them. Same as we see people who desire power are always the ones who try and obtain it. People also survive all the time because they had the means to defend themselves. A gun is in no way shape or form a tool for defense. Every gun class in the country, in the world will tell you that. First rule is you don't aim it at someone unless you mean to kill them.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:07 PM
0

You made the claim. I ask for proof and your rebuttal is to ask me to disprove your claim? What? I no way did I ask that, I asked you to prove yours that an armed audience would not have made matters worse. How about looking within individual regions, you know, to maintain a relevant context? Define... It does list them by country. Would you like it by postal code or even street address too? I think globally would give us the best view unless you disagree. Since that gives us a wide verity of op…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:04 PM
-2

You show me yours... unless you can't which I know you cannot. I really doubt that an armed audience would have made it worse, As for crime, countries with more regulation and less access to guns show a much less homicide. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate Africa at the top, followed closely by the Americas, then Asian countries in the middle and Europe and island nations at the bottom.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:56 PM
-1

I'm saying is that given the mentality of people who own guns and the lesser regulation we have over them it is justified to fear them more then someone who had a different mentality and who is regulated and tested. It's no different then asking who would trust to conduct a surgery. Random Joe who has no background info; or a seasoned Doctor whose made a career and passed years of training?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:48 PM
-6

Now you're just trying to argue semantics. A seat belt is there for my protection; a gun is not a tool for protection, its a tool to kill things, that is it's primary purpose. There is a reason in gun safety class that's on of the most basic things you are taught, don't aim it at something unless you intent to kill it. Far too often people will think it's a great idea to pull one out as a show of their ball or to intimidate, which only escalates the conflict. If I choose not to use a seat belt t…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:45 PM
-3

It's hardly crazy to suggest that people bordering on paranoid schizophrenic are fit to wield a gun. We make sure and test people when using larger weapons or driving. But an automatic rifle? SURE if you got the money.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:41 PM
-2

bullshit fuck the ideals if its going to cost a man his life to give an unfit person a gun. We put people under psychological testing when we place them in charge of weapon systems in the military, but if you want to buy an automatic* rifle all you need is enough money. Technically semi, but there are lots of guides online to convert them.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:29 PM
-4

I'm, not saying Wild West, but somehow places with tighter and or no gun ownership laws see a lot less murder and manslaughter.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:27 PM
-2

And like I said I never said yo disallow you to carry them across the board. BUt we cannot hand out a gun to a mental patient who could not even qualify for a DL. If the state says you're not fit to drive, then you damn well aren't fit to carry a gun.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:16 PM
-5

And you're the kind of person I'd worry about. You can't read beyond a third grade level otherwise you'd see I nowhere said we should abolish all gun rights across the board.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:12 PM
-3

In the Aurora thing, I really doubt that an armed audience would have made it worse, but that's arguing hypotheticals, so I'll drop it. In no way is it hypothetical, we see cases of untrained people trying to use a gun to resolve a situation and making it worse. You just want to drop it because you know I'm right. If engaging in a firefight like in that theater was not such a big deal we would not put SWAT and Military people through special training to handle just that sort of thing; it costs m…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:08 PM
-4

Owning one and driving a car are in no way the same. You have people with collections of hundreds of guns. How many of them use a gun for several hours per day, along side and in close proximity to other people, many of whom are not in an alert state of mind; and have police officers checking to make sure everyone is being safe? Let's go take a look at counties like China and India that don't really est drivers. While we're at it let's look at countries that don't allow gun ownership and see the…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:03 PM
-6

It is justified when you consider the possible repercussions. Guns and conflict do not end well. Someone is going to be shot.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:56 PM
-4

As far as the Aurora shooting went, if someone in the audience had a weapon, drew it, and fired, even if they missed they would have likely saved lives due to the shooter having opposition instead of free reign. Shooting at someone at the front near the screen doesn't have many drawbacks compared to cowering or fleeing at crowded exits. You're fooling yourself if you think that. Shooter was in a smoke filled dark theater surrounded by loud noises from the movie. People did not even react initial…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:50 PM
-3

I never said you should not be able to own guns, I just said that you should not use it as the first and only go to reaction to other people. Also it's a false stat, more people drive, people use cars for longer periods of time. People get tested and are actively monitored for their use. People are placed in more dangerous situations. About the only thing I need to buy a gun is the money, we see mentally handicap people who cannot get a DL but can buy a guy.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:44 PM
-4

But a guns main purpose is to kill. Most people do not have the training to use them properly especially in a situation where they might be needed (Aurora Shooting); and we let far too many people have them that should not (Castle Doctrine murders). Worst case with a broken pipe is I got some flooding, and may have to turn off the water valve. Worst case with a gun, I got an innocent man's blood on my hands.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:25 PM
-2

I'm sure most are responsible, problem is we do more testing for people to drive then we do for people to own a gun.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:23 PM
-3

I wouldn't consider those the same. If I use a seat-belt when I don't need to I don't have to worry about someone being killed.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:20 PM
-1

vigilance of what? We've already seen people passing by don't bother with the facts of a situation. I'd be much more fearful of a guy with a gun who was itching for any excuse to use it; over a group of rough looking people.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:04 PM
132

And that they were possibly personally sued for the damages; they directly contributed to his loss.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:35 PM
40

people got to get over this white knighting Never going to happen... Men want the affections of women, men think that by standing up for these poor helpless women they will be rewarded with said affection.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:34 PM
-12

Yea, I don't understand my coworkers to seem to live in constant fear and have to keep weapons on their person or in their vehicle for fear some hobo will try and attack them.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:33 PM
2

Wait let me get this straight there are people who will pay and watch me intently to draw doodles at a convention? and why do I have a day job?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:44 PM
2

wait what? no idea what that's in reference to.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:19 PM
1

Well according to this comment it looks like she seems to have gotten a bit cocky and demanded the organizers of the convention this year accommodate her harassment demands/policy. They turned her down and said good riddance. Personally I think it's just normal white-knight-ism. Shes a reasonably attractive women in a community which in all frankness is low on women, so people look past faults they would call out others for.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:13 PM
1

How long ago was it? I stopped paying much attention to her a few years ago, so IDK wht shes been up to of late, unless it makes the news here on Reddit.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:09 PM
1

Oh they know, you had email writing campaings to the Hosts but nothing was done. It's also not an isolated incident, I know she cost them advertisers for the show but they keep her around.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:09 PM
4

Personally I think shes one of the "profesionally offended", she makes it her mission in life to find SOMETHING no matter how flimsy to be offended and complain about.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:07 PM
11

Well I know she and Richard Dawkins got into it. She was at a convention and while waiting for an elevator some guy asked her out for coffee, she flipped her shit and went off talking about how conventions are sexist, and a whole host of other shit. RD got involved and basically told her to stop acting like a drama queen.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:50 PM
11

She pretty much is... Also had to stop supporting (donating) and listening to that Skeptics Guide podcast shes a panelist on. A shame really, because it's really interesting when shes not on.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:32 PM
40

dude, just don't read her stuff. Shes very fond of taking heavily downvoted troll comments and using them to generalize an entire subreddit. She once compared /r/Atheism to misogynists by quoting trolls. And If you posted a comment explaining how Down/Up voting work, it would be deleted and you'd be banned from further comments. Shes also taken the stance that women don't lie about rape, and is a proponent of the wage gap myth.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:29 PM
0

I like The Young Turks. Cenk can be a little narrow minded at times though, especially if you get into alternative lifestyles. Ana though is very likely a closeted Furry/Kinkster.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:08 PM
0

YEa thats why they had to pass a certain act in 1848 speciaily allwoing women to inherit family proerty. But you'd know better then the histroy books.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:31 AM
-4

I'm not talking about "Who had it worst". Just the simple fact that at one point in history women were seen as second class citizens and were tied to her Man. Why would I bother with anything you have to say since you've already demonstrated to be dishonest. So I'm cheery picking because someone who has provided ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE OR SOURCES FOR ANY CLAIMS, wants to use Ancient Rome as a model of 18th century social structure? Compared to Me who has provided reputed sources and cited examp…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:40 PM
-2

For this argument they are effectively the same. Where they ever full on 100% true no rights slaves? no not really, unless you get into some Bedouin tribe in the Middle East. Were they effectively second class citizens who could not form contracts, and had to defer to their husband at the time our laws and social structure were created? Your god damn fucking right, and we got the legal documents to back it up.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:02 PM
-1

I never said throughout history... OP's whole "argument" is that they were not always, which makes no sense as a rebuttal to the statement of "when they were". By definition that statement means that they were not always, but is referring to when they were. What evidence, tell me in OP's post anywhere that something got cited? Even his quote is uncited, and was just copied from someplace with no context. And it does not matter what happened in Ancient Rome or anywhere else. It's so far removed i…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:25 PM
-8

OH so now it's some great conspiracy by Feminists throughout history, who lemme guess also went back and altered legal documents to support a modern ideology. It's this kind of shit that makes people not take MR seriously. Give credit where credit is due, I have no problems acknowledging some Femanist claims probably have some merit, I'll not discredit everything they say based solely on them being a Feminist. It's that same type of attitude that makes people blindly defend women.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:39 PM
-5

Fine yes, I am sure if you look hard enough you can find some obscure legal code on some Asian Island that treated women the same. Finding something from Ancient Rome has absolutely jack shit to do with this argument. Even if it is true is does not change the fact that women were seen, either culturally or legally as a second class citizen in our more recent history. Seeing as we're talking about the US, whose legal code is based off the English and whose history is very closely tied they are th…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:24 PM
-1

Except for how you know you're wrong... Women could own property as long as there was no entitlement, so if she married and divorced it was no longer hers. English law is very clear on this idea of entitlement and not allowing property to carry on via the female line of the family. Take a look at "Mary Eleanor Bowes" a Countess who had a special secret prenup put into place to protect her property from being taken by her husband. Women were expected to fill those roles in the even there was no h…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:00 PM
4

I think there is a diff between just coming to the aide of an underdog, someone whose been abused; and being a white knight. They will more often then not go out to try to FIND something to defend. Plus there is the social construct of giving women power because they are women, and you want their attention. I perceive this person as a threat, therefore if I come to her aide against him, then I will garner at attention.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:31 PM
13

Oh wasn't a quote, just formatting it different for when SRS tries to take it out of context and claim I am advocating domestic violence. *I got the idea from the book "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress". Women are scarce so group/poly marriages are common and all men are like White Knights who protect women. Some take advantage of this and exploit their suitors in a similar way to how we see now. There is a part when a tourist makes an unwanted advance and is nearly thrown out an airlock for it by a…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:18 PM
33

I think it dates to when women were property. If a women got out of line it was her husband/owners fault, and he needs to put her back in line. Obviously all these pansies just need to put these women back in line, since they can't it must be a problem with them. Of course that was and still is complete BS, but we've only gotten past the obvious part, and haven't dealt with the more subtle aspect. That and you have so many white knights rushing to their defense, in my opinion partly as they stil…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:08 PM
1

TBH I would be worried that one would somehow get the AMA removed, could be seen by the Mods as a loaded question and the like.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:21 PM
0

No you should not, it's a matter of exploitation; same reason why you cannot date your boss or superior officer.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:28 AM
-4

IN what way are direct quotes in any way shape or form senataionalizing soemthing on my part?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:51 PM
4

You're still talking about a caregiver/teacher and her charge. Even if you're 18 you can't get romantic with your teacher.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:47 PM
2

awe yes, the age old question...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:20 PM
1

Yea, huge ethics violation, needs more then just to get fired.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:19 PM
-2

He's still in her charge. Similar to say a student and teacher.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:18 PM
1

Instead the Daily Mail owned rag mocked the amateur protestors – for sending them press releases with inaccuracies in them. I think I see your problem...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:55 PM
14

And pretty damn generic... That discounts children and basketball players, so that only leaves a few billion suspects.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:08 PM
2

Yea, not like there is anything foggy about it, might have might not have; everyone admits they did have sex.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:03 PM
1

Yea with her and Dawkins getting into that letter writing bit too.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:36 PM
1

You asked if it was illegal in part of the world. Doesn't matter all that much since she did violate the FB TOS. Also all the cyber-bullying stuff we hear is usually more long term.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:22 PM
0

But that's just it, males are NOT a majority in many areas, and yet are still claimed as an oppressive majority.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:55 PM
1

Any idea why he does? I know her comments have cost them viewers and advertisers/donations. Seems odd they would keep her around if shes negatively affecting their finances.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:54 PM
0

Yea, too many people just wishing "can't we all just get along", or just avoid the topic entirely.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:43 PM
2

Yep, that's the one, I think they were waiting for an elevator at a convention.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:41 PM
5

Yea, and most of those jobs aren't all that low stress... 2,3,4 are pretty much the same job, you'd need the same basic education requirements for all of them. With #5 she obvious has not spent much time reading the horror stories on Reddit, also you don't just pop into it, it takes education, experiences, and office politics; expect to work long hours, and be on call as needed. The actual work won't be too stressful, but be prepared to sign away your social life and deal with Dilbert-esque boss…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:36 PM
3

I did a job like that, 100% scam... In theory you could make a lot but it would be dependent on the bank fucking shit up. I paid $80 for the kit which was a DVD with a video tutorial and SW I would need.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:32 PM
4

I wonder if it'll turn into the situation with Catholic Priests...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:03 PM
0

I like him, but had to knock him down a bit for his support of her anti-skeptic comments. Let's selectively quote several heavily downvoted troll comments from a subreddit with almost 1.2 million people and cite them as evidence that the entire group is bigoted.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:55 PM
13

A few notable quotes: They were horrified to discover that McHugh, of Carlisle, had been whisking the boy off to Glasgow hotels for sex, paying for the rooms on her credit card. The criminal charges against her were dropped but she refused to attend an inquiry by the SSSC in Dundee. Panel chair David Hughes Hallet said: “Removal from the register is the only appropriate sanction.” No criminal charges, but at least she got fired.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:42 PM
1

Its a really interesting podcast save for her presence. You have several panelists who talk about popular and trending topics of a skeptical nature. Steve Novella a neurosurgeon? did an AMA here a while back, and he's pretty interesting with his knowledge of medical science.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:31 PM
0

Well Doxxing is against the FB TOS.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:28 PM
1

As did I, even donated for a while; not followed PZ much though. TBH I always felt she was the weakest of the bunch, listen and compare the episodes where shes absent, the ones without her will have the guys working as a well oiled machine, while the ones with her will have them all stop and explain something every two minutes. A few times she thought the BS claims were real, was kinda funny hearing her start thinking some Indian Swami can actually levitate, and everyone's jaw drops like OMG ser…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:28 PM
17

Same here, she posted some factually wrong info on her Skepchick blog and I commented with several peer reviewed studies that disagreed with her blog source, so my comment was deleted and I was banned. She then updated later saying since no one disagreed she must be right. That's pretty much entirely opposite how a skeptic should act.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:25 PM
9

Also see the Elevator Incident, and when she compared /r/Athism to mysognaists; and /r/MR to pedophiles.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:22 PM
1

I'd be curious about family pressure. You see that a lot of Hispanic families but the men are usually the HoH.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:32 AM
2

No one said you were, but most school boards who enact the policies that you were criticizing are.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:34 PM
1

Yea, matches up with my own experiences. Any explanations WHY that is?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 04:52 PM
1

I have always wondered about that. Seems like they take the "Dumb Dad" to a new level.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:01 AM
3

Yea, I kinda agreed till then. Idiot does not even know it's Republicans who head most school-boards and set those policies in place.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:59 AM
1

Maybe a couple decades ago... Never got anything that thought proving, To Kill a Mockingbird, and Romeo&Juliet were probably the most notable works we read. Beyond that it was all pop stuff
/r/MensRights22/09/12 11:51 PM
2

They're certainly incentivizing it. As a man I have zero to gain from marriage, hell for what a marriage and divorce would cost I could put a hooker on retainer.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:22 PM
28

aking control of their finances or isolating them from friends and family are guilty of domestic violence Sounds like what many women do when they get into a relationship or married. Can I go out to the bar and play some pool with the guys after work?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:39 PM
3

Yea, at the end of the day you have a responsibility to express yourself. Don't want something TELL THEM, and that goes for most things in life too.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:47 PM
2

Hell you don't have to have any, just ACT like a parent and you can be given a CS order, even though they are not yours.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 03:52 PM
1

All thanks to this Maleocentric Maleocracy, or some other crap.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 03:51 PM
3

Yea i can see the next txt mesage being: Give me money, or don't you love your daughter?
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:00 PM
2

How am I uninformed because you refuse to cite sources for your claim? Also what does Israel have to do with anything, we're talking about US law. Like I said we previously has NO protections under the old rape laws, now we have some. I fail to see how that's a negative.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:34 PM
3

Show me what I was wrong about? Previously we didn't have any coverage, now we got a little coverage. For me to fault Feminists, I would have to see where Feminists whittled down a previously expansive law/definition.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter