TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fishwish Archive

View 9 posts and 438 comments by fishwish on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

And there we hit a bit of a line. I don't think anyone here wants to support actual rapists. If there was a group that was a bit more discerning about who they picked up as clients and the cases they take, I would be more apt to donate.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 10:12 PM
4

Sadly these attitudes run rampant within the rape hotline & domestic violence agencies. If you really want to support an organization that tries to balance things out, find an organization that supports male victims of domestic violence. And not the fake ones that tell men how bad they were and ask they what they did to deserve the abuse from the woman.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 09:42 PM
3

Her friend was the decent one. She tried to drag her ass out of that car.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 08:37 PM
3

https://secure.crimestoppers-uk.org/ams.form.anonymous.asp http://www.essex.police.uk/contact_us.aspx
/r/MensRights06/02/11 08:35 PM
22

“It seems very wrong to me that you can walk into Boots and buy something that can split up a family unit,” says the father-of-three. It's not the test that splits up the family. It's the infidelity.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 06:42 PM
-8

While he doesn't have billions of dollars, he does have some substantial assets (house, land, liquid assets in the bank, etc). If those assets were acquired during the marriage, and he doesn't have a prenup, I think she deserves half of that. It was a partnership. She is going after full child support I agree with child support. But I do question how fairly that is allocated. and 1,000 a month in alimony Bullshit. If she doesn't currently have a job, I could see providing that for a year until s…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 08:26 PM
-1

Once the relationship is over, what exactly makes someone entitled to the other's earnings? I think both partners deserve the earnings acquired during the marriage to be split unless a prenuptial agreement was put into play. Post marriage, I think it's OK to provide spousal support for a year to two at most in order for the poorer partner to re-establish their earning potential. Otherwise that burden may just fall on society. But beyond temporary support to get someone on their feet, I agree tha…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 08:20 PM
-5

That is a big discussion that we can chop down significantly if you tell me if you consider that too much or too little. Assuming you think splitting the assets acquired during marriage is too much, well it comes down to what you think marriage is. I think it's supposed to be an equal partnership or sharing each other's lives. If you think that is unfair, go for a prenuptial agreement.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 07:54 PM
5

When you walk into a marriage, it's a partnership. Unless you have a prenuptial agreement, I don't think you have any cause to complain about assets acquired during the divorce being split evenly. This may simply be a situation where we will have to agree to disagree. I suspect we both can whole heartily agree that divorce should mean a complete separation of each other's lives. All of this extended alimony is bullshit. I can understand providing a year or two support to help the other partner g…
/r/MensRights05/02/11 07:50 PM
-11

I've got to play devil's advocate here. I'm well familiar with the hypocrisy of feminism, but may have a bit of a blind spot when it comes to men. Where do men diverge between what they say & do? Or are you talking about identifying scam artists & hucksters?
/r/MensRights05/02/11 07:28 PM
-5

I think it is fair for assets acquired during the marriage to be split evenly. Asking for more than that, or extended alimony payments is just absurd.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 07:25 PM
2

Don't bother with the first 9 minutes, 40 seconds. Advertisements & bullshit. Marriage discussion happens at 1:02:20 The last 7 minutes covers the family court.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:28 PM
14

Legally yes. In practice no.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 07:32 PM
0

Also, I'd be surprised that "at least half the reddit user base" are guilty of statutory rape, women included. And if they are, then that's a very serious problem that needs addressed before it afflicts another generation of young people. That statement was based on IF that india law was applied. Thankfully some (but not all) states have more sensible laws when it comes to teen sex. According to this: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-ATSRH.html , 13% of US teens have had sex by the age of 15. T…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:22 PM
1

What is a 3 year age difference?
/r/MensRights01/02/11 01:00 PM
4

That is a 3 year age difference. Shit like this happens in the US too. It doesn't make it right. Teens fuck all over the world. Ruining peoples lives over such an occurrence is absurd. If this law was applied to everyone, at least half the reddit user base including women should be in jail on statutory rape charges.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 12:59 PM
3

If you want to fine tune your verbal wit, you need practice. http://www.toastmasters.org/
/r/MensRights30/01/11 07:09 PM
21

First off it's spelled "sissy" not "cissy." Next, slapping her for verbal harassment is the wrong choice. Verbal harassment should never be met with physical violence. No one will respect that. Next, yelling at her is typically a wrong choice. If she is acting nasty or crazy, sinking yourself to her level doesn't make you look any better. You will both just look crazy. Of course if you happen to have a razor sharp wit that is always handy. But inspiration doesn't always come quickly at all times…
/r/MensRights30/01/11 07:06 PM
2

How many employees? More than 50? http://www.dol.gov/whd/fmla/
/r/MensRights30/01/11 05:47 PM
1

I think the only time that feminists get into this fight is when male circumcision is compared to female circumcision. THEN they get into a terrible fight about how those two situations are in no way comparable.
/r/MensRights27/01/11 09:18 AM
3

“All men are potential rapists” is such a troubling statement for most men who have no desire or urge to commit rape. And its troubling because it is, on it's surface, true. True, but incomplete. You know what? If feminists are going to toss out horrible statements that people think are technically true, we have to point out that it technically isn't true. This guy could never do it even if he wanted to. http://ts8.gazettelive.co.uk/2007/09/exam_success_for_brave_daniel.html
/r/MensRights25/01/11 09:17 PM
1

Can you show us an example? Or is this just with people looking for room mates?
/r/MensRights23/01/11 08:54 PM
4

Yup. Fair housing act (In the US). You can't discriminate against gender. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_housing I am pretty sure this doesn't apply to room mates.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 08:50 PM
8

Because a landlord discriminating based on gender for housing is illegal in the US. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_housing He can have a preference, so long as he doesn't act on it.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 08:49 PM
2

Abortion is a rocky issue that I don't think would serve men's rights to get involved in. There are people passionately who feel both ways on the subject. And often the people duking this out look at this as a black & white issue with no shades of grey.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 05:01 AM
2

Here is one off the top of my search. There are other more detailed responses in other threads & I suspect it will come up again if you keep your eyes open over there. http://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/f6srs/dear_raskscience_theres_no_need_to_tag_evolution/
/r/MensRights23/01/11 02:43 AM
4

Feminists fighting over evo psych There were a few good threads over at r/askscience explaining why they are not all that wild about evolutionary psychology. Mostly it boils down to a lot of said research lacking scientific rigor. I think it's OK to question a lot of the tripe that gets published.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 12:47 AM
11

Any sperm donation not done through a sperm bank makes your liable for child support. And sperm banks won't allow two people who know each other to make a transfer. If you really want to do something like this, drop some off at a sperm bank. Doing it this way will really screw over your life.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 12:38 AM
2

So we are being asked to stand behind a guy we don't even know without even the most basic knowledge of his situation? Yes, we are a men's rights group. But you can't really ask us to blindly start signing petitions for individuals we know nothing about? For all we know the guy is insane?
/r/MensRights22/01/11 08:22 PM
3

Same problem that exists today. Women are not held accountable to the same standard.
/r/MensRights22/01/11 01:48 AM
8

Also, would you wait in line 20 minutes for a treadmill or would you just go exercise some other way? I know I don't need to wait 20 minutes to find a sidewalk to run on. Plus the line about being told he should have let the other women go ahead of him in line seems unrealistic and could be intended to raise the stakes of the story.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 07:38 PM
10

Something seems off in that story Probably because it was posted by an account that was just created that day and has posted no verification of anything. He does according to him have an audio recording of the whole incident. But in the end it doesn't really matter. The correct answer was given to him to go see a lawyer & sue. So if he is just trolling, there is no harmful effect.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 07:33 PM
2

Well, if you are going to narrow down your statements, I'll engage. Mens rights does not require you to believe in strict gender roles or a specific origin for them. I'll agree with that statement. Famous mens rights activisits have different views on this matter. Not surprising. Of course I don't know of any famous men's right activists.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 08:25 AM
0

I see a wave of sweeping generalizations riding on a wave of bullshit. So not worth the time to engage or pick apart.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 07:48 AM
5

You can review the edit history here: http://www.wikihow.com/index.php?title=Be-a-Modern-Gentleman&action=history
/r/MensRights19/01/11 02:27 PM
1

While I appreciate the police are taking this very seriously and are doing everything possible to catch the perpetrator, how would you feel if you were one of the eight other innocent men who have been rounded up and jailed on trumped up charges? You can't make it to work. How do you even begin to explain something like this to your boss? Now you have to worry about bail (which probably isn't going to be an option), a lawyer, paying for that lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 01:11 PM
8

And this is part of why we should not link to 2X threads here. Sometimes they don't ask the right questions. But if you leave them alone, more times than not, they will. Trust me. We are far better off staying off of these 2X subjects.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 09:48 PM
3

The linked image was a pretty good symbol. http://i.imgur.com/m4EeU.png
/r/MensRights16/01/11 08:31 PM
8

Jokes like that really don't help the men's rights movement. Just read the linked article to see how it fails badly.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 11:49 PM
12

She's not a feminist bigot. She is working for equality! /sarcasm
/r/MensRights15/01/11 11:48 PM
5

It depends on her argument. There are instances where it could work well & instances where it could work against you.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 11:07 PM
2

Sorry. In the example you provided, when you said "even if she just unloaded on him for 10 minutes," I incorrectly assumed you meant verbally.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 05:57 PM
11

You know what? I'll take something back. You are not an 'Intro to Feminism' Feminist. You are a full blown hypocritical feminist. And as you call yourself... a true feminist. Your intro is the same. "Feminism is about equality." But you don't really mean those words. When it comes to men's rights, you look for ways to belittle men's rights by calling it parallel to white rights. You go for the ad hominem attack to try and cut down our creditability. But when it comes to women's rights, it's diff…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 05:54 PM
-1

Such as arresting a man if he hits a woman once even if she just unloaded on him for 10 minutes and he had to hit her to get her to stop. Violence is not an adequate response to nonviolent acts & I won't support that kind of justification. You can always walk away.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 05:37 PM
5

You say you are for equality. You say that "men's rights" is like "white rights." Do you also say that "women's rights" is like "white rights"?
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:50 PM
20

Many of those in the "white rights" movement believes that black people have risen too high in society and feel there should be a backlash. White people are by and large not oppressed in the US simply for being white. These are not people that want equality. Why are you arguing about "white rights" here? We are not defending them. We are not making the same argument that women have risen too high. Women can have whatever jobs they want and earn as much as they want. But what we are arguing again…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 03:10 PM
14

I have no problem comparing mens rights to white rights, or straight rights to gay rights. At the end of the day, it serves to bring both groups down. Then I should be OK comparing women's rights to white rights. Because you are all about equality right? I didn't want to cloud the conversation with my own work Nothing you have stated there shows me you that take gender equality seriously. Yeah, a political appointment. A sex education group. A social action committee. Still this shows me nothing…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:57 PM
17

Outranked and outnumbered by all other feminists? That kind of sweeping generalization makes it very hard to take anything else you wrote seriously. Kind of like how I took you a lot less seriously once you compared men's rights to white rights? Take a good look at the public face of feminism. It isn't even looked on favorably by women in the public. You can't tell me there isn't a serious problem. I also take great offensive to being called the intro to feminism feminist. I'm OK with that. Feel…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:37 PM
27

and would just like to present some facts. Oh, boy facts. "Womens rights" evolved due to the oppression of women throughout history. I agree. All being a feminist really boils down to is believing that women and men should be respected and treated equally Ah, the dictionary definition of feminism vs. how it gets implemented in the real word. Claiming that "Mens rights" evolved out of the womens rights movement, and being proud of earning scorn, reminds me of people clambering for "white rights" …
/r/MensRights14/01/11 01:34 PM
7

This is the post she is referring to: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ej780/so_youre_a_feminist_in_mensrights/
/r/MensRights14/01/11 01:15 PM
10

Mr Wainman said the woman he had been dating for 14 months had attacked him twice previously. Take your clues gentlemen. Don't stick around for this bullshit. Someone is going to end up in jail or seriously hurt.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 12:00 PM
10

Here is my two cents. Don't boycott valentines day. If you feel it is too commercial, do something special that does not revolve around buying the traditional commercial stuff. Showing your partner that you love them is important in any relationship. In fact, you should not be relegating this kind of stuff to a couple of times a year. At bare minimum, try to do something special for your loved one at least once a month. It doesn't have to be with expensive gifts, flowers or cards. But you can fi…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 12:54 AM
5

Is it really the kids you are worried about, or the parents?
/r/MensRights13/01/11 10:34 AM
2

Chat logs? Really?
/r/MensRights13/01/11 09:39 AM
2

I've seen it first hand. That bathroom was protected fiercely.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 09:40 PM
6

No. Not an issue for men. Some women can be very obsessive about the cleanliness of bathrooms. If there is any way they can get a bathroom to themselves and keep the general public (including other women) out, they will. Making it key access is just a way to keep other people away. Meanwhile, you are free to take a piss whenever you need. Trust me. We have it better.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 09:29 PM
3

http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Toilet-Novelty-Presidential-Bathroom/dp/B003EN9S58%3FSubscriptionId%3D14H876SFAKFS0EHBYQ02%26tag%3Dhubpages-20%26linkCode%3Dxm2%26camp%3D2025%26creative%3D165953%26creativeASIN%3DB003EN9S58
/r/MensRights11/01/11 06:44 PM
1

Lord knows no one here would be offended by toilets in a women's restroom where you could shit on a guy's face. http://www.oddee.com/contrib_5871.aspx
/r/MensRights11/01/11 05:57 PM
10

Maybe they aren't really feminists though. The feminist movement is full of more "no true" feminists than any other group I know,
/r/MensRights09/01/11 10:47 PM
10

What do you expect? They don't want any conflicting opinions or points of view.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 10:37 PM
2

By the way, the methodology applied to reduce that 30% to 10%? Flawed. Flawed? What you mean actually testing the population of men who are suspicious enough to get a paternity test in addition too the population of men who are not suspicious enough to do so? Point me to a study that says 10% that is not based on a pool of self selecting men. Point is: Mandatory paternity testing is a Men's Rights issue. Sounds stupidly, pointlessly expensive. Why should we all have to pay for paternity tests if…
/r/MensRights09/01/11 10:03 PM
1

I don't know what your are specifically pointing out, but if you are trying to suggest that 10-30% of all men are cuckolds, you are using a biased number. The pools for those tests were from men who already had some reason to believe that they were not the biological fathers. That is an extremely biased pool to even attempt to compare to the rest of the population as a whole. By all means, I think paternity fraud is a serious issue. But we need to approach this issue with some intellectual hones…
/r/MensRights09/01/11 09:47 PM
16

That was a well written article on the subject. No hype. No hyperbole. No use of extreme words. No use of derogatory terms. No sweeping claims that all women are this way. Claims backed up with examples. We need more of this type of writing when it comes to men's rights issues vs. the angry posts slathered with vitriol.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 03:25 PM
1

The two article links are the same.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 02:48 PM
4

4 posts on the same subject in the same reddit in an hour isn't justified.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 07:08 AM
3

OK. Spam monkey. 5 posts, 4 of them on the same topic within an hour. Put down the pot.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 06:45 AM
2

OK. Fine. Wear your kilt. I really don't care one way or another. Lots of people wear kilts.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 06:36 AM
4

Yeah. OK. Whatever. You can consider it shaming language, but by doing so you are calling what he does shameful. I don't think if it that way.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 06:31 AM
4

Huh? You want to cross dress? Go ahead. No skin off my back. Plenty of people are doing it. Fuck it. If the men's rights movement isn't going to give me more freedom, I'm fucking done with it and it's already obsolete. If it's just going to seek to continue to MAKE MEN OUT OF MALES, then the MRM is just the status quo in disguise. And i'm not dumb. Uh, OK. You already rage quit. Fine with me too.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 05:42 AM
5

I don't know what this is about, but if you want to cross dress, more power to you.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 05:32 AM
4

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 04:30 AM
3

Sorry. Not satire. That group really is that fucked up.
/r/MensRights09/01/11 01:24 AM
1

I don't know about its authenticity Hard to make stuff like that up. There are a couple of good websites to look up 990 forms. Here is one: http://foundationcenter.org/findfunders/990finder/ That is where I found that form.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 10:34 PM
5

i've already told her im getting a divorce, but its going to be a hassle to get it now as we are overseas so i said i may wait 5 months till we both get back home... still not sure what to do. You just gave her a green light to fuck whomever she wants. So if this was a tough love plan, I don't think you thought it through all the way.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 05:25 PM
4

Why wasn't she enjoying her equality? No one cat called her. No one treated her as a sex object. And no one treated her any different because she was a woman. This is the part the kills me: Next to me was a building site full of men in fluoro ­jackets standing doing ­nothing. They could see my distress when I began ­peering under the bonnet. I got back in the car, and on my mobile phone to call the BMW breakdown ­service to get the vehicle recovered. I was in tears. Still no one ­bothered to hel…
/r/MensRights08/01/11 02:33 AM
1

I really don't feel like digging them up. But the do pop up often enough. Just hunt around or subscribe to some women's forums. Read through the ones like "was this sexual assault" or "I think I was raped." At some point someone will ask if she actually said no, tried to leave or tried to fight him off. And someone will inevitably tell the person you shouldn't say no or else they will get violent and beat them. People like this are by no means the majority. But it really is fucked up when you ar…
/r/MensRights06/01/11 06:53 PM
0

What? You think I am kidding about the feminists telling women that they shouldn't say no because it is dangerous? If you read through some of these date rape threads you will see people advocating this stance.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 05:28 PM
0

Yes. The women's course is different. To be honest with you, I would much rather they teach women how to defend themselves, than the other brand of feminism that tells them that it's dangerous to ever say no and they should just sleep with anyone who wants because he might hurt her & then yell rape after the fact. And honestly, I also think there is merit to peacefully dealing with violent confrontation. In most cases you can walk away. Now I do understand your desire to potentially be taught a …
/r/MensRights06/01/11 01:59 PM
12

On the flip side, young men are negatively affected by that statement too. When young men hear "boys are only after one thing," the ones that pay attention and follow the rules think 'Oh, no. I don't want to be the bad guy." No adult will ever tell a young adult that it is OK and natural for a young man to want sex. And that it doesn't make him a bad, evil, dirty person. No one ever tells them that there are good scenarios were sex is a good thing. Take it for what you will. Just know that the a…
/r/MensRights03/01/11 06:45 PM
4

You know... so what? These are only rules that apply to that specific political party that they imposed on themselves. They probably did it in an effort to gain votes from women. Sounds like a smart long term political move.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 11:20 PM
1

and I would, quite frankly, have been thrilled to have the option to ride in a women-only car many days when I was a regular El commuter in Chicago. Something tells me she only wishes she was a target for harassment. http://imgur.com/6lDm7
/r/MensRights02/01/11 10:58 PM
8

Hey look! Feminism 101! http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2010/01/feminism-101.html You may not think she is a feminist. But she does. And she is hardly a minority of the feminist community. No true feminist?
/r/MensRights02/01/11 10:55 PM
-3

No. This is bizarre & ugly. http://imgur.com/bOlbb
/r/MensRights02/01/11 07:27 PM
3

That is also what I am wondering. The dates listed above are June 2-5, 2009. That is Tuesday through Friday. Pretty much a normal work week for a man. Perhaps they don't see him as culpable because he wasn't there to call an ambulance? He clearly attempted to persuade his wife to take the child to the hospital. But still these are what-ifs. They are no better or worse that your assumption. Stop making stuff up and find an article that verifies what you claim.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 06:05 PM
6

Perhaps you are not understanding what I am saying. The article linked above makes no reference to the father not living in the same house. There is no reference to them being divorced or unwed. Has that information been found in a different article?
/r/MensRights02/01/11 05:09 PM
4

Because that happens to millions of people and it's an everyday, normal occurrence. Sometimes you have to read between the lines. So you are just pulling it out of you ass? Sorry. Making up your own facts just isn't good enough. This is not r/feminism.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 04:47 PM
15

This is the typical gender war tripe that "news" programs do to attract attention by stirring people up on gender lines. I would classify that type of journalism on par with Jerry Springer, Maury Povich, & Nancy Grace. It does not deserve any attention.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 02:27 PM
2

They don't even do that. They go more tabloid and show off the horrible things men do. They are more out to make a buck that to do anything socially significant.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 02:15 PM
8

That wasn't in the linked article.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 12:57 PM
3

Oklahoma government leaves father powerless to prevent the murder of his child. I'm missing the part where the government prevented the father from taking his kid to the doctor.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 12:45 PM
3

It was already posted there.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 12:41 PM
15

"So let me get this straight. Brad says he saw me feeling up his girlfriend when she was asleep, yet he didn't wake up the whole house including his girlfriend while beating the shit out of me at that time? How much more proof do you need that he's a liar. I know he doesn't really like me, but this is some pretty low shit to pull. What the hell has this jerk done in his past that he comes up with this shit?" It might be nice to add examples of him lying and exaggerating before. Do you have any? …
/r/MensRights02/01/11 12:26 PM
4

His credibility is already shot from what he said in his post. That's the thing about rumors. You don't really need credibility.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 12:04 PM
15

Please don't stir the pot over at 2X. All your posting there accomplishes is to stir up the dormant feminists, which in turn may enrage the normal women who otherwise may have more healthy attitudes towards gender relations. You are in essence creating your own enemy.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 11:10 PM
7

That's the problem with using vulgar terms or derivatives of vulgar terms in a serious post. It makes it that much more difficult for people to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 01:18 PM
3

It can't be one set of rules for the accused & a different set of rules for the accuser. This has been far to open to abuse.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 11:29 PM
4

Then sue the shit out of the cable company. If he is really worried about it, see a therapist. In fact, I suggest he see a therapist anyway as what has happened to him clearly has affected his ability to function normally in society.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 09:59 PM
4

Yes. Only the person employing her has to worry about discrimination. And that employer can just as easily send her to another house. You have no liability here.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 06:11 PM
3

Inside your own home they are totally legal so long as they are not in a place one would expect privacy such as a bathroom.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 06:08 PM
19

Yet legally I cannot refuse to let the repair woman in the house based on her gender since I called for the repair? Or can I? Yes you can. You are not the employer. You can say who can and cannot enter your house. If you were not the victim of abuse, I would say it's a pretty shitty thing to do. But in your case I'll make an exception. Just as I would make an exception for the victim of rape. Can I insist on a male repair guy when I need repair work of any kind? Sure. Just say that you were a vi…
/r/MensRights31/12/10 05:44 PM
5

Statistically it's bound to happen to some people. Some people have been struck by lightening multiple times. Some people have won the lottery twice.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 05:39 PM
0

That subject is a quagmire. Not worth wading through if you want to make a change.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 05:59 AM
4

The bulk of the people submitting their stories to reddit for votes are women. The person running the web magazine is a woman. Nothing wrong with having women involved, but it would be nice if they actually identified with men first before trying to push an agenda. It's hard for me to tell if they are just pushing out whatever popular crap gets attention in the pursuit of a buck, or if they are trying to push an agenda. I think it's a mixture of those two. http://www.reddit.com/domain/goodmenpro…
/r/MensRights31/12/10 04:48 AM
2

I think this is totally overblown Huh? cunt overlords Is that really necessary? Furthermore, I think britain must be destroyed. Oh, I see. U B Tr0llin.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 02:57 PM
10

My understanding is that divorce lawyers insist one money up front. I hear a lot about up front retainer fees too. The only time I don't hear about lawyers asking for money up front is when they are working on a percentage commission.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 08:30 PM
16

What lawyer is going to take someone who can't afford to pay up front?
/r/MensRights29/12/10 08:17 PM
4

First off, you can scratch off pretty much every western country. If children are involved, they will kick it back to the country that is the primary residence of the kids. Just out of curiosity, what laws in Mississippi are so bad? Also this: child support garnishments I can understand perhaps thinking that some divorce laws are unfair & need to be over turned. Or that child support laws are unfair or enforced in an unfair manner. But if you are trying to tell me you are planning on skipping ou…
/r/MensRights29/12/10 03:31 PM
2

How about a summary for those who don't love reading legal judgments?
/r/MensRights29/12/10 05:36 AM
-1

Men's Rights isn't a place for racial issues.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 10:36 AM
25

He wanted sex with you when you didn't. You wanted sex with him when he didn't. Case closed.
/r/seduction22/12/10 09:22 AM
-4

Black woman who insists Why was it necessary to put the color of her skin in the title? In short, it wasn't.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 08:41 AM
11

...hmmm... I'm a bit of an outsider on this issue. But from what I have heard, one of the least attractive parts about feminism is how mainstream feminism runs around and tries to tell women how to think and act. Now this blog post tries to tell women how they need to think & act or else a label will be hung on them if they like it or not. That doesn't seem to be any better. It's like a Bush era tactic. "You are either with us or against us." That's a bit much.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 08:18 AM
4

Time to talk to a lawyer. Also, instead of going to battle with your wife, it would be cheaper to see if you can settle things and go your separate ways.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 02:35 AM
4

the second I said that the definition of rape had become loosened up to a point where it's skewed against men she flipped. She started saying things like 95% of rapists walk away clean, false accusations are of minimal consequence, and other such exaggerated rape claims. So she kicked your ass because you let her change the subject on you whenever it didn't work well for her. It's not that you can't have a decent discussion or debate on these topics, but you didn't come packing with statistics e…
/r/MensRights22/12/10 02:33 AM
3

So if they ever lose the bit of trust they should get divorced immediately. Good plan Einstein. Way to be practical for the real world.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 09:48 PM
-1

There are going to be a lot of unhappy wives if everyone follows your advice. Trust isn't necessarily a 100% binary position. And sometimes people do break your trust.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 08:52 PM
2

Now we are getting into the territory were we are both better off if I can just find her original writing.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 03:17 PM
6

I'm going to have to agree with this if he truly intends to file a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:52 PM
5

you should not have assumed anyone threatened anyone. I am not making that assumption. What I am saying is I don't necessarily believe either one of you without some evidence. Some people call that blaming the victim. I call it finding out the facts before rushing to judgment. So I trolled them. I wrote "all your pussies belong to me" and tagged it with that tag, Not very nice. But it also does not warrant her claim. I can't find that on your twitter account. Another time I wrote "Just relax and…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:49 PM
5

If you intend to sue her for libel, I would highly recommend watching what names you call her as it may confuse the situation & open grounds for a reverse lawsuit.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:23 PM
1

She didn't call it cat calling.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:05 PM
3

Also, twitter says that your profile has been suspended. https://twitter.com/G0ldenScepter Why has the account been suspended?
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:53 PM
9

G0ldenScepter, who threatened #MooreandMe with rape, What statement(s) is she making reference to? just admitted a woman reported he raped her. ACTUAL THREAT. KEEP SAFE. DON'T ENGAGE. What statement(s) is she making reference to? You already admitted that you are trolling this woman. For all I know, you are trolling us too. I'm not going to run in white knighting for you without knowing the facts. For all I know, she is telling the truth about what you told her. So show us the context. And as ot…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:51 PM
1

I didn't say it's a complement to be catcalled, guy. I said they were giving her complements. You are calling it catcalling.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:24 PM
0

No. The translation is good. You are just missing the additional text that I have not re-found yet. She was in Paraguay & one other South American Country and she was bitching about how the latin men would say complements to women on the streets. A few of the spanish words were not translated as they are more or less very specific to that culture.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 04:00 AM
1

I may poop out on you before I find a source for Anna's writing on this (She deleted a lot of unflattering statements) This is part of the statement. I can't recall off the top of my head if she wrote the original in Swedish (which is part of why digging this stuff up is more difficult) or if she wrote it in English. I understand the use of hijab. I understand the use of burka. In a patriarchal society it protects the women. First remove the patriarchy. Then remove the hijab. Introduce the hijab…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 03:10 AM
1

OK. Here is a 2007 blog posting about her winning an award for being the Equality Manager for the Student Union at Uppsala Student Union. http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fmartaaxner.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F04%2Fsfs-direkt-uppsala-studentkrs.html A very happy Anna Ardin , equity manager at Uppsala Student Union, received the award during the banquet last night and talked about how the group has included equality from Upps…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:55 AM
1

ETA: That is the source? Eeeee. It is a source. I saw her CV (what Europeans call their resume) when it first came out. That title & who she performed that job for is fully accurate. Do I really need to dig the CV up?
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:28 AM
1

I never said she was a liar. I seriously don't want to dig through all of her writings & statements on this situation. The one thing I do know, is that for all her statements to date that have been made public. She has never said the Julian Assange raped her. Nor has anyone inferred that she has made such statements. Her lawyer & everyone else attracted to the chaos are the ones yelling rape. Quite simply, you cannot insinuate some kind of sexual scandal without certain types of feminists crawli…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:25 AM
0

[citation required] I asked you how much money it would cost you to whore yourself out in your own town and you want me to cite a source?
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:39 AM
0

And do you have a link to this document? Not handy, but if you really want it, I will dig it up and share with everyone. Does the fact that she did not like being catcalled mean that she cannot possibly be sexually assaulted? No. But it shows a lack of sense of proportion on her part. If someone complements you, saying that it would be justified to slit there throats is beyond psycho.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 01:07 AM
1

Please don't make me dig up her CV. I saw that thing a loooong time ago. I did provide a source for kicks & giggles. She was the Equality manager for the Uppsala Student Union. For that she dealt with issues of sexual harassment. When she went to the police for "advice" she knew exactly what she was doing. She got her major from the Department of Government at Uppsala University where she also was an Equity manager at Uppsala Student Union, http://sports.rightpundits.com/?p=5578
/r/MensRights21/12/10 12:59 AM
2

You do realize she did not actually write that, right? That is correct, she was not the original author. All she did was: 1) Take the time to translate it to Swedish in full. 2) Post it on her feminist blog. 3) Prefix it with this personal note: Jag har funderat en del över hämnd de senaste dagarna och kom över en väldigt bra sida som inspirerat mig till denna sju punkters hämndinstruktion på svenska. Which translates to: I've been thinking about some revenge over the last few days and came acro…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 12:51 AM
-1

How much would it cost you to whore yourself out in your own home town? Now how do you pay someone that much money and sure they keep the transaction hidden? It can't be on idealogical terms. Anna Ardin just doesn't swing that way.
/r/MensRights21/12/10 12:40 AM
2

It's a document she put out about some of her travels in South America. Being a latin culture, some of the men would giver her complements as she passed by. She said she wanted to slice their throats for that.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 09:58 PM
4

and don't like the idea of the patriarchy (what else would you call the hidden power-structures that wikileaks is fighting?) Government. Corporations. I guess some people would throw in the adjectives corrupt, manipulative &/or deceitful. But really, that's up for the individual to determine.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 09:23 PM
5

I think what it comes down to is that the media exposure to this has become so huge, that feminists who might typically keep their mouths shut are talking. There are huge issues when you water down what the definition of rape is. I am honestly surprised to see that some of them are actually taking a stand.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 08:53 PM
2

Sorry. Not a CIA sponsored honey trap. I researched the hell out of this situation when it first came out. The alleged CIA connections to Anna Ardin are beyond weak at best. Now that isn't to say, the US government isn't taking advantage of the existing situation after it was already reported to the police. They clearly are. But they didn't set this up from the beginning. The absolute worst thing possible going on in terms of a set up, is Assange fucked two girls in three days while staying at o…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 08:44 PM
2

Jaclyn Friedman argues the sexual assault allegations shouldn’t be dismissed just because they’re politically motivated, Wow. That's got to be one of the shittiest arguments to make.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 05:47 PM
7

I think 9 years is pretty damn good. Especially when false allegations normally get no jail time.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 03:48 PM
0

but in our society today why isn't there a similar option for men? Because it is still under development and being tested. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3543478/ns/health-sexual_health/ Does anyone know about this? Just do a google search on the subject. You will find plenty. For the most part, it's always been 10 years away. But I think they are actually close now as they are doing limited clinical testing. Would an oral contraceptive for men be welcome? If it works, yes. No more getting trapped …
/r/MensRights20/12/10 12:13 PM
3

Here are her submissions from 8 months ago. http://www.reddit.com/user/Qeraeth/submitted/?count=10&after=t3_c3z3y Where is her submission saying, "let's go get MensRights"?
/r/MensRights20/12/10 02:29 AM
2

Link please.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 02:24 AM
8

They probably suspected you were a troll. As I stated before, they are kind of sick of the gender battle bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 12:11 AM
2

Femiservatives want to ban ALL internet porn There are plenty of conservatives who want to ban porn. Both men & women who I would hardly consider feminist. Prudishness has been with us for a long time. I don't necessarily see the connection with Feminism.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 12:03 AM
11

Is it ironic that a women's rights group on reddit, is sexist against men? 2XChromosomes isn't a women's rights group. It was created to get away from that shit. Yes, there are some feminist things posted there. But the more people unfairly put the 2XChromosome reddit in the middle of the gender wars, the less likely they are going to be able to have a normal reddit.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 11:49 PM
-2

I have to admit I don't know what a concern troll Someone who doesn't back up their statements with evidence.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 05:59 PM
8

Quit your bitching. Cite examples (show us the links) Having a userid called "flame_away" is all the justification we need not to take you seriously. "Rage quit" posts are usually disrespected across the internet. Yes, I have seen examples of people being a little too knee jerk in their reaction to different points of view. But when I express my point of view, I don't expect everyone to agree with me. Then, I posted one dissenting comment, saying that I thought a proposal was too extreme and tha…
/r/MensRights19/12/10 05:56 PM
1

Ask your friend what his girlfriends pet peeves are, then act them out. Dig out a big old booger. Stuff of that nature.
/r/seduction18/12/10 07:18 PM
-6

Children still believe she's a "good person." That is because they are 4 & 8 years old. I feel sorry for them. None of this their fault. I see no reason to change their minds. They can figure it out when they are older.
/r/MensRights18/12/10 01:19 PM
2

Well researched.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 12:28 AM
37

Whenever I date a guy, I think, is this the man I want my children to send their weekends with? LMAO? At first I didn't see the problem with this as most people evaluate their dates as potential marriage material & being a good parent is part of that. Then I realized she was only worried about the weekends, thus implying no marriage. Just a sperm donor & a pocket book to fund them.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 09:27 PM
2

I honestly don't know. UCR = "Uniform Crime Reporting". That's a government report. The data collection is an effort to get a top level view of criminal activity and trends in the US. At that level, they probably are not too concerned with tracking the small details. They are more concerned with the big picture. I honestly don't know if that definition is a result of: It's too small to track. Feminists intervention Traditional 1950's view that only women get raped that has stuck with the governm…
/r/MensRights15/12/10 09:10 PM
2

I am genuinely sad to say that this kind of revelation is becoming par for the course with feminist scholarship. That isn't feminist scholarship. That is the federal government.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 01:13 PM
2

According to the FBI, only 8% of all rapes reported in the US are "unfounded" but not necessarily false. (http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/Cius_97/96CRIME/96crime2.pdf) 1997 was the last report in which they calculated that. That file does not exist. Edit to Add: Found the file's new location. www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/1996/96sec1.pdf (Page 24) Rapes by force constitute the greatest percentage of total forcible rapes, 87 percent of the 1996 incidents. The remainder were attempts or as…
/r/MensRights15/12/10 05:26 AM
11

Holy crap. This is why there are no reported statistics of females raping males. For UCR reporting purposes, can a male be raped? No. The UCR Program defines forcible rape as “The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will” (p. 19). In addition, “By definition, sexual attacks on males are excluded from the rape category and must be classified as assaults or other sex offenses depending on the nature of the crime and the extent of injury” http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/frequ…
/r/MensRights15/12/10 05:17 AM
1

Might I suggest either briefs or boxer-briefs to help keep things in check at the office. So even if you have an erection, it isn't flopping around pointing every which direction.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 11:05 PM
2

Is Jessica Valenti supposed to be a reporter?
/r/MensRights14/12/10 03:33 PM
2

"In fact, some activists and legal experts in Sweden want to change the law there so that the burden of proof is on the accused; the alleged rapist would have to show that he got consent, instead of the victim having to prove that she didn't give it." I don't think that Jessica Valenti really understands Swedish rape laws. The prosecutors need to prove that the accused knew that he or she did not have consent.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 02:54 PM
1

Seek mental help and get that divorce over with as soon as possible so both of you can move on. It sounds like you need to get yourself on a firmer footing before you can worry about helping other people.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 02:55 AM
8

It's good to see conflicting points of view on occasion. But I do agree that it's sad to see such an unintelligent reply.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 10:52 PM
7

So if there is "toxic masculinity" I assume there is also "toxic femininity." Does the author of that article propose we hold all women responsible for the behavior of bad women?
/r/MensRights13/12/10 09:51 PM
5

Than a blog?
/r/MensRights13/12/10 12:55 PM
10

Here is a better news source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1335618/Innocent-grandfather-gassed-hours-child-porn-police-raided-home.html
/r/MensRights13/12/10 12:45 AM
4

That subject looks like a quagmire.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 07:15 PM
1

No. This is hot. And it's still her. http://imgur.com/at7Dd.jpg But I wouldn't go near her with a 10' pole.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 07:15 PM
7

On the other hand you have to learn your place, woman. That sounds an awful lot like the feminists that run around saying "check your privilege". Both are disgusting attitudes. You may be joking. Or you may be trolling. But it doesn't represent who we are.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 04:53 PM
3

There are a few women who hang out here and are well accepted. Then there are a few hyperfeminists who come here to troll on occasion. People that blame everything on a Patriarchal society, or insist we unpack or invisible knapsack or that we are over privileged white males generally are not looked upon fondly.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 04:40 PM
1

Does she look crazy here? http://imgur.com/UU7nW We don't always have the benefit of a mugshot.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 03:25 PM
1

She was a contestant. She didn't win.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 03:22 PM
7

No. This is a moderated forum. Not a democracy. If you don't like how he moderates the forum, you are more that free to create & run your own moderated forum that suits your tastes.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 07:29 PM
4

I wasn't tracking theEnglightener's comments. But posting personal addresses & phone numbers is going too far. It encourages vigilante behavior that doesn't solve the problem.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 03:49 PM
0

We lack focus on core issues. This kid of stuff falls into the 'battle-of-the-sexs' made for TV crap. Plus your title is over sensational.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 02:23 PM
35

I'm going to have to agree with kloo2yoo's judgment here. And kloo2yoo isn't a fool or a fascist. He's the moderator.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 02:19 PM
4

Of all the concerns about men's rights, this isn't even close to being one.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 01:48 PM
1

If feminists present a list we can discuss it. Expecting a Men's rights forum to come up with a feminists list of demands is beyond absurd. They are so scattered as a movement, I doubt they could produce a list that they all agree on.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 07:48 PM
5

You are asking the wrong reddit.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 06:54 PM
1

Woman did something nasty or said something nasty towards men = Must be their FEMINIST POLITICAL ARGUMENT. Vague generality. Not even worth discussing without examples.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 06:02 PM
4

has a daughter at the school, who I understand is terribly disruptive and has no social manners. Sounds like a lot of preschoolers to me.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 05:56 PM
9

This kind of looks like another bitching fest thread where we all circle-jerk in agreement to a straw man argument. At a certain point, we need to start talking about real issues and looking for places where we can make real changes. Otherwise we will become mired in a hole of self pity.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 06:00 PM
1

She is accusing him of breaking the condom on purpose. All of this wasn't an issue until both girls found out he was fuck both of them within a 3-day time period.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 04:21 PM
6

More women vote than men. In both numbers and by percentage. It has been that way since 1980. Now their beef is there are not enough women elected into government? Women have to actually run for office before they can be elected in.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 05:33 PM
5

I'm not sure I want to bother reading through all that tripe. It's like opening up a women's magazine and finding all sorts of thing offensive. If you are looking to be offending, you will be successful.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 03:32 AM
10

Snooping is done by both genders. It's a true cluster-fuck when it comes to relationships. I don't see this as a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 03:17 AM
5

The complaint listed two Minnesota convictions as the basis for application of the persistent repeater statute: a December 18, 2003 conviction for first-degree burglary and a January 7, 2004 conviction for fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct. Sounds like some_asshole has an issue with "three strikes" laws. I don't really see that as a men's rights issue. But if some_asshole does, we might as well add global warming too.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 02:55 AM
3

I would suspect the higher incidence is because the societal rule "Never hit a woman" doesn't apply to women.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 02:19 AM
3

Hard to comment on without seeing the advertisements themselves.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 06:15 PM
1

He's being hit hard over there for even posting and not going right to the cops. Depending on where he lives, it could be good advice or his worst possible move. I know. If he's lucky, it's a 50-50 chance that the cops will just throw his ass in jail instead. Especially if she accuses him of anything in return. If they are a good police force, they try to get him in touch with the right people to talk to about domestic violence. That's the hardest thing to get people like this to do. And it's wh…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 01:30 AM
-1

Sometimes men who have done violent actions get off light too. You would be shocked to know who they let back on the streets so easily.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 12:12 AM
10

Well she does make an argument to feminists that they should try to provide good dating advice. But as she notes, that most feminist ideals don't work with the real ground level dating scene.
/r/seduction29/11/10 10:50 PM
1

Thanks. That link on the right is incredibly hard to notice. I've been looking for a list like that for a while.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 10:33 PM
1

There are always resources available for men in any city or town if a women is subjected to domestic violence. Not so much for men. Does know of any decent resources? The biggest issue with victims of domestic violence is they keep on going back even if they are abused. It takes a lot of talking & support for them to get out (if they ever do).
/r/MensRights29/11/10 09:33 PM
9

tl;dr - She has no answers or suggestions. She just observes that feminists don't do dating advice.
/r/seduction29/11/10 09:18 PM
-1

It wasn't. We had a long discussion about healthy sexual attitudes. She agreed that what I was doing wasn't bad and the way I was expressing myself was healthy. She just had a negative body image. Especially when it came to her breasts. The thought that ran through my mind at the time is that I would hate to have a daughter with her if she was going to foist her negative body image on a daughter.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 08:26 PM
0

Yesh. Take a joke and don't be too butt-hurt PC. The only time I point stuff like this out is when feminists are being hypocrites.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 07:21 PM
2

I've never heard another guy call me a pig. But I have heard it from a women. The relationship ended soon after.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 07:09 PM
31

So I'm just wondering should a attempt to defend myself from her mother or should I just leave it alone? I can't imagine anything you can say to her mother to make things better. She's lashing out looking for someone to blame. Flopping about like a wounded animal in front of her is the wrong thing to do. She isn't going to listen to reason. She just wants someone to attack. Don't present yourself as a target. Don't respond to her at all.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 10:39 AM
8

Self defense is best taught in person with the students practicing it. I understand they don't have the budget to do that. But if they are going to try and do the video only option, I think they need to lay out ways for the girls to practice these techniques on their own in the video. You can't just tell people how to fight. You need to get them to practice ahead of time so that they are confident and more sure of themselves when something happens.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 10:07 AM
1

You are really trying to defend this? Honestly, why does she even care. I don't understand. Why doesn't she just ignore it like everyone else. I see things like this on the subway all of the time. Causing this guy to go to jail is not proportional to his pulling out his penis in public. I thought we live in a liberal society where we are tolerant. So long as noone is touching anyone else, there is no harm. I don't complain when people have horrible tumors on their faces and force them to stay in…
/r/MensRights24/11/10 05:45 AM
3

What that means is we need to investigate further prior to going off half-cocked.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 01:12 PM
5

Teachers should be not banging their students in high school. All I have to say is that he is charged with the wrong law.
/r/MensRights20/11/10 06:07 PM
21

Got ya. "No true straw Scotsman"
/r/MensRights19/11/10 09:02 PM
9

I don't see your two quoted sentences in any of the parent posts or the article itself.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 08:30 PM
2

Because he would take it to be with his daughter. And as she pointed out in the video, if he struck back she would have had his ass in jail fast.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 08:21 PM
15

I don't see how "No true Scotsman" applies to what baytosdguy said.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 08:15 PM
19

That might be a very good thing if that is the reason they are entering into marriage. I'll chalk that one up in the positive column.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 01:37 PM
1

I think the US courts have it right when it comes to cheating. They shouldn't give a shit about who did what. Just know that it's over and end the thing.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 01:05 PM
13

I suspect there would be a lot less divorce if there was no alimony.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 01:04 PM
9

Or after working 20 years at a low wage job putting in plenty of overtime to support his wife, John finds his wife busy fucking another guy while he is at work. His ex-wife has already shacked up with the new guy & stays at home. Surely she deserves nothing. (OK. Yes, she deserves split assets that were accrued during marriage & half of the retirement investments made. But men are not life long meal tickets.)
/r/MensRights19/11/10 01:02 PM
3

How is the uniform biased towards girls? Give some examples of how school teachers give subtle and sometimes not so subtle hints at girls being better students How do a lot of assignments favor girls? How have female teachers been sexist?
/r/MensRights15/11/10 09:10 PM
-3

Crossposting to polar opposite reddits just brings out the worst in both of them.
/r/MensRights13/11/10 09:29 PM
2

http://www.wickedlocal.com/hingham/topstories/x1615402251/Postal-workers-video-draws-attention-to-2009-Hingham-racial-incident http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/11/12/woman-goes-postal-postal-worker/
/r/MensRights13/11/10 05:10 PM
4

Why bother? It's a giant circle jerk over there. They don't want to hear anything that opposes their world view. And if you do speak up, they will ban you for not following their rules. They are power tripping because they have mod status. The only thing to take away from that is recognize that it is extremely easy to fall into your own circle jerk and just listen to people who agree with you. Learn from them and try not to be like them.
/r/MensRights13/11/10 02:28 AM
3

pay women scientists more because they were women That doesn't sound like a very egalitarian or equal point of view. So much for the dictionary definition of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/11/10 02:24 AM
1

Different spaces different rules.
/r/MensRights13/11/10 02:21 AM
8

I find them to be spam monkeys. They spend all day digging through reddits to try and find some article that might be even tangentially related, create a new subject line & post. They just keep on recycling their same shit over & over again. http://www.reddit.com/domain/goodmenproject.com/ They even posted their UFO article in IAMA. Obviously the poster was not the person doing the IAMA. Edit: Here it is: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/e307v/i_am_a_son_of_the_worlds_premier_ufo_researcher…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 07:09 PM
1

Nah. Safer to go gay or use hookers. It's a more honest relationship that costs less.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 10:39 PM
5

All woman's suffrage was about was providing them with the right to vote. That was in no way a bad thing.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 10:26 PM
4

Undergraduate students (N = 488) from a large, nonresidential, Hispanic-serving public university in Texas Well if that isn't the broadest most representative cross section of feminist that I know of, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 02:38 AM
10

On the question of is she has done this sort of thing before, there is an unconfirmed note (kind of like her blog post) that states that she made rape allegations against a guy on her university blog but did not report it to the police. The comment was posted on tech crunch's now deleted article, but this guy saved it. http://pauloflaherty.com/2010/11/06/what-about-the-other-side-of-the-noirin-shirley-accusation/ I used to move in the same circles as this woman and she is a bit of a Walter Mitty…
/r/MensRights06/11/10 10:13 PM
5

Interesting. Tech Crunch has killed their article. I wonder why. http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/05/trial-by-twitter/
/r/MensRights06/11/10 07:04 PM
8

With the Republican party tossing forth candidates like Sharon Angle & Christine O'Donnell is there any surprise that there were losses?
/r/MensRights06/11/10 06:42 PM
3

Yes. But you do realize that by the very fact that you have engaged in this discussion, you have failed to live up to your own higher standards.
/r/MensRights06/11/10 03:18 PM
6

She did it on her own blog. People on reddit are commenting on it as they would any other news story. You can't stop people from talking about things.
/r/MensRights06/11/10 02:07 PM
1

If his actions are as described, this it was over the line. But also what I see as very unfortunate is that some of the commenters are not escalating the claims to say he attempted to rape her. The first casualty in any of this always seems to be any sense of proportion.
/r/MensRights06/11/10 01:59 PM
2

But the implant is sooner. May be sooner. I'd also have to say, fuck that implant 3-ways until Sunday. They offer those implants to women too. They shove something into your body that doesn't biodegrade. It has a limited life span. It's shoved in with a needle, but you need surgery if you want it removed. It's wrong for women. It's wrong for men.
/r/MensRights06/11/10 10:58 AM
3

...Who is resisting this?
/r/MensRights05/11/10 05:50 PM
1

That sounds a lot more promising than "someday" Agreed. But they have been announcing male contraceptives for the past few decades. Honestly, I'd rather wait until they have an actual product that can be delivered.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 05:41 PM
17

check your privilege Sounds a lot like telling a person to "know your place"
/r/MensRights05/11/10 04:23 PM
1

In theory I could sell my eggs for $10-20k a pop, but I don't because I don't like the idea of a biological child of mine running around that I have no relationship with or connection to. I know a woman who did that. She doesn't want to have kids.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 03:21 PM
5

It is now believed that an MHC in the form of a daily pill could be available on the market within 5 to 7 years
/r/MensRights05/11/10 03:16 PM
3

The video seems somewhat serious. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfR_9rkJkfw Until you see what this blogger actually did & why he did it. http://www.gerritsenbeach.net/2010/11/01/no-police-response-despite-massive-damage-by-local-teens/
/r/MensRights05/11/10 02:46 PM
1

it’s hard to take this as anything more than a crazy plea for attention.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 01:03 PM
1

What on earth does this have to do with Men's Rights? It seems all you do is submit links to that shitty blog. http://www.reddit.com/user/rwohan/submitted/
/r/MensRights04/11/10 09:07 PM
8

Try outside of class. Small stuff. Hey, did you get homework assignment for today?
/r/seduction31/10/10 09:38 PM
4

Interesting. It appears some people have abused the Web of Trust program to flag this as a dangerous website. Including flagging it as not safe for children. I don't see any porn on that website. http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/manwomanmyth.com
/r/MensRights31/10/10 09:33 PM
13

Woohoo! http://imgur.com/gCBKc
/r/MensRights31/10/10 04:32 PM
7

BRB. Calling him now to tell him you are interested. By the way, he has partial mexican ancestry so his name is pronounced Jesús, not the anglicized version Jesus.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 04:22 PM
9

Damn it. I was hoping you would continue to argue. My grampa was looking to score. http://imgur.com/RGDQ4 (ageist!)
/r/MensRights31/10/10 04:11 PM
33

Well you might be, but does it really matter? Let's put it this way. If you refuse to screw a 45 year old man, does that make you an ageist? Perhaps. But at a certain point you need to throw out these labels and affirm that you allowed to make decisions on who you let into your life based on your own personal preferences. What you are looking at is political correctness run amok. If you ran a restaurant or hotel it would be a different matter. But you don't. You are choosing who to invite into y…
/r/MensRights31/10/10 03:33 PM
5

As a preliminary step, I would have him move his CD & savings out of US controlled banks into another country and somewhere the spouse doesn't know about.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 02:46 PM
5

What country is he from? If all of his assets are in CDs & a savings account, he can just pick up and leave. Good luck in getting any US court order enforced in another country. It's a pacifist, non-confrontational approach.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 02:35 PM
6

I agree. This is something for the parents to deal with. Not the law. At least they are eating their own shit when it comes to gender neutrality. But it's still wrong for law enforcement to get involved in mutually agreed upon sex between similarly aged teens.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 01:34 PM
2

This is sad. Article: graduated from Harvey Milk High in 2002, worked at Gay Men of African Descent on HIV prevention, and was described as an "advocate for LGBT youth" -- hanged himself on Saturday. By most accounts, Jefferson was a true LGBT youth pioneer. More recently, Joseph Jefferson was said to be an assistant to Laurence Pinckney and James Saunders, New York City's popular Black LGBT event promoters. Jefferson was also active in New York City's colorful ballroom community. This guy actua…
/r/MensRights31/10/10 01:18 PM
53

Next time tell the bouncers that a woman who's obviously had too much to drink is slapping people.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 01:50 AM
4

Effective safe male birth control is almost here. You can hold your breath. I'll pass.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 11:22 PM
8

Keep this list in mind the next time you think about stereotyping all women as the same.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 05:18 PM
5

Insults still don't do much to change ideas and attitudes.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:54 PM
7

OK. That sounds funny and makes a point.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:53 PM
5

Dear 7-methyltheophylline, It appears to me that you are an ismist. Please check your ismist privilege.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:46 PM
5

MaleStudies was born b/c people in MensRights got tired of being proactively banned by 2XC. Very interesting. Any documentation to back that up?
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:42 PM
57

She appeared to be saying that he was abusing his privilege as a man by speaking freely. So she resolved that by abusing her privilege as a moderator.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:33 PM
21

Jesus fucking christ. Ableist? It's amazing that they are attempting to demonize everyone with labels. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ableism I guess that would make her a labelist.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:25 PM
3

Hmm... interesting perspective. Maybe she does have a mental disorder so that's why she really doesn't like to be called crazy?
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:21 PM
2

Why use that and appear like a fool? It would only be fair to use it on yellowmix as a point of satyr.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:15 PM
-16

When people behave badly, insults just make things worse. You fail to point out the bad behavior that someone else could understand and you play into the same exact stereotype they have been boxing you into.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:13 PM
11

That is already well known.
/r/MensRights28/10/10 05:27 PM
3

I hope you weren't the one to delete your own comments. That aside, you have the right idea. I really do wish more Men Rights advocates took time to try and reason out their points without resorting to insults, name calling and extreme hyperbole. The ones that do that come off as nutty as the extreme feminists, and in the process tend to make Men Rights advocates look bad.
/r/MensRights28/10/10 08:44 AM
12

Interesting perspective, but let me throw a few ideas at you. When you engage in discussions like that on the internet, you are correct. Odds are extremely slim that you will change their minds about anything. But there are perhaps people reading who haven't necessarily made up their minds. That is your true audience.
/r/MensRights28/10/10 08:05 AM
2

I know. The guy has made a career out of porn. Wife: What ya' doing honey? Him: Work. fap fap fap Wife: Not that again. Him: Sorry honey, I don't like it, but I have too. fap fap fap
/r/MensRights26/10/10 07:00 PM
21

Article: McCormack Evans says porn-watchers can quickly descend into self-hatred. "They're sitting there afterwards, and there's an image left on the screen, and they look at themselves and think, 'I'm disgusting' . . . Then their daughter comes in, or their wife, or their girlfriend, and they've just been to Pilates, and the next day they start looking up Pilates porn, or something crazy like that, and they feel even worse. It can become quite self-destructive." I don't think porn is McCormack …
/r/MensRights26/10/10 11:39 AM
2

Then maybe we should just ignore it. Not give it any attention. And through inaction not encourage any of his sales.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 03:19 AM
2

You haven't seen their faces yet.
/r/MensRights23/10/10 01:13 AM
4

So men die and women are victims cause they can't find a husband? There are costs to war all the way around. It is fair to recognize this side affect of the death of men. Article: The war has had any number of hidden costs for Iraqis.
/r/MensRights23/10/10 12:54 AM
3

http://imgur.com/uD6ay
/r/MensRights22/10/10 06:39 PM
-1

That is even less likely.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 11:58 AM
4

BTW - You REALLY have to be careful with the zipper when doing this.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 11:57 AM
27

Plan B - Stop wearing underwear.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:57 AM
-7

But my stupid stepmom caught me this ONE time hanging outside the house with my friends with my jeans hanging low. ... But she insists that I have to wear tighty whities briefs from now on. LOL. This is what you get for dressing like a douche. How the hell am I suppose to have a social life like this? What? You can't have sex? If it's that easy, every parent should know this. Or even change in the baseball locker room? Why should you care what male baseball players think about your underwear. Th…
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:56 AM
7

Give her a few years in prison playing thumbfumble mcpokey with a huge diesel-dyke cell-mate and she'll have a new perspective on what rape really is. I doubt that will happen.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 02:38 AM
14

Ring Ring 1970 called. They want your rage back.
/r/MensRights22/10/10 01:00 AM
6

Oh, I think it's great that they kept the cameras rolling and showed this on TV. If they hadn't. Or stopped it after one blow, it would still be going, no one would put a stop to it when the cameras stopped rolling, and nothing ever would get done. I think some women are upset that the domestic violence myth has been broken.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 09:23 PM
8

??? Women have lower rates? I thought it was the other way around. I thought women typically cost more for gynecological exams and the potential financial risk of birth.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 10:51 PM
3

At times I've wanted to but couldn't figure out a nice gender appropriate version of telling her to pull her head out of her ass, get her act together and deal with the situation at hadn.
/r/MensRights17/10/10 04:04 AM
4

Where does the girl This is "the girl" http://www.reddit.com/user/awoollyhat call it a "Genius facebook de-friending defense"? You already stated the answer: That is from the title of the reddit post and one of her friends' responses. Sorry for your confusion. I try to keep titles short & referenced her friend's title. Evidently I provided enough information for you to figure it all out after all. Furthermore, she tells him it was statutory rape (because she was fifteen) which is simply a fact (…
/r/MensRights13/10/10 02:04 PM
3

Utah Supreme Court Posted: 12/06/2006
/r/MensRights11/10/10 12:10 PM
15

Article: She added: 'I don't think a sexual bully should go to jail for seven years but a couple of months' community service wearing a t-shirt with the word 'rapist' on it would be good. Huh? I think rapists should go to jail. I suspect her definition of rape is far broader than real rape if she thinks they should get off so lightly.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 09:41 PM
0

None of those are examples of using the term "feminist" as a pejorative. I see examples of people riping on feminism, but not actually using the term as a pejorative.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 09:23 PM
8

Lovely. I think we should start an education program called "Women Can STOP Fake Rape." It's all about redefining femininity as being someone who doesn't make false rape allegations. (If anyone does not get my outrageous joke, take a look at this and see how much of a joke it isn't. http://www.mencanstoprape.org/ )
/r/MensRights10/10/10 05:45 PM
1

Can you give examples of how feminist is used as a pejorative? As I see it right now, people tend to view feminism (even outside of a Men's Rights context) negatively in and of itself. So is it our fault when calling someone a feminist is viewed as a pejorative? Honestly, I don't think we should use pejoratives at all. It waters down the debate. It takes focus away from the bad behavior. And people just start looking at your like you are an irrational angry wing-nut. When you start to call peopl…
/r/MensRights10/10/10 04:00 PM
1

Nope. Sounds even worse.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 03:55 PM
1

Maybe we should try to use a more specific term...personally, I'd prefer "gender-feminists", or "female-supremacists" And then you will sound like the ones who insist on spelling out womyn.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 03:54 PM
13

It's real easy. Treat people as individuals. Don't blame all women for the actions of some women. Not every woman carries the same ideas and attitudes that have caused significant harm. And some women may never have had their ideas challenged. Perhaps some of them might change their minds on some of the ideas if they were presented with a reasonable case to the contrary. It's kind of this way with a number of vocal feminist. They blame all men for the actions of some men. Now do you really want …
/r/MensRights10/10/10 02:27 AM
21

Note: Reputable magazines or journals (e.g. science journals) the studies are published in would count too.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 02:09 PM
4

If it was used in a peer reviewed journal then you can use it as a cited source.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 12:51 PM
58

Because the average Joe doesn't know how to fix things on Wikipedia beyond spelling and grammar errors.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 12:48 PM
31

You will need a cited source from a reputable newspaper to attempt to fix that. Don't do it any other way.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 12:47 PM
3

I don't think any child support system in the US offered college education.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 09:29 PM
1

She should be able to feel the baby kicking by this point. No. That's at 21 weeks.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 09:03 PM
8

This is starting to sound quite expensive just to shop at a specific store. And I'm not sure trying to get her fired is the best approach to not escalating personal conflict.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 08:10 PM
10

I don't care what happened. Get a restraining order. Now. Well that kind of works against his desire to shop at CostCo. Once he places a restraining order on her, he also has a duty to not visit her place of employment.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 08:00 PM
3

That is a good point. Make sure you capture all messages & content she has sent you. Never reply.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 07:57 PM
4

Hmmm... no ignore or block feature. You could just change userids so she can't harass you this way anymore. Or report her messages every time she does it (But I don't think that will do much good).
/r/MensRights03/10/10 07:06 PM
15

Odds are most of it is on video. If she makes false allegations, she would get caught by her employer. Whatever you do, don't talk to her at all at Costco. Even if she speaks to you. Just ignore her, or tell her to leave you alone. Don't play games or goad her. Also, how did she happen to contact you regarding this? Put a stop to that right now. Set her e-mails to autodelete. Block her phone number & incoming texts. BTW - Ex-wife or Ex-girlfriend?
/r/MensRights03/10/10 06:58 PM
16

Everyone in men's rights are not mandated to agree with any particular point of view. Nor are we mandated to advocate for every single man no matter what he has done, what he says, or what his position on issues are. Right now men don't have a legal say in abortion. Honestly, I don't know how I feel about this issue. But I don't know how much good it does to tell him when he has no say in the issue anyway and the last time he just wanted to get rid of the problem & her too. Edit: By all means, m…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 04:03 PM
16

Well there is no legal right. So you must be talking about some social, moral or ethical obligation. If that is the case, he kind of blew it the first time around. I see no reason for someone to eat another shit sandwich from someone who won't recognize equal responsibility for what happens.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:53 PM
4

She got her answer last time. Why should she expect anything different.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:45 PM
13

To be honest, the guy sounds like a bit of a jerk. This is what happened last time: The guy is my on/off long-distance boyfriend who broke up with me last time I had a pregnancy scare because he couldn't "go back to normal after that drama" and it took weeks for him to calm down. If he knew I was actually pregnant and getting an abortion, he'd flip out and leave again, and I can't handle that right now. If she doesn't think she should tell him because he will flip out and dump her, it's time for…
/r/MensRights03/10/10 03:39 PM
4

He had better have been the one doing the duct taping for him to have received a sentence that significantly longer.
/r/MensRights01/10/10 04:03 PM
-7

I hate to say this but let's be realistic. Some men do need dating advise. I sure some of the author's advice is bullshit. And some of the advice is spot on. And on the bit of this: "Plus the authors of this book are obsessed with money and maleness to an almost comical degree. Men have to pay. Period. They have to pay on the first date; they have to pay on every other date; they can't use half-off coupons on dinner dates; they have to pay for valet parking. Well, that just might be part of bein…
/r/MensRights01/10/10 02:38 PM
16

Everyone knows that women are capable of committing the same crimes as men. Welcome to the present. Try to get everyone to acknowledge that. Welcome to the present.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 08:01 PM
28

I think it's a good thing this is being aired. It brings these issues to light. As it stands now, women are never the abusers.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 06:18 PM
-3

Actually the key is in the redefining of feminism. Ladies, if you were in the kitchen and not on a college campus, or at the bar... That is a pretty demeaning way of putting it. But the author of that article is also extremely demeaning in how she thinks it's her right to redefine men.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 04:11 PM
5

I agree. It's pretty disgusting. Women/feminists decide they have the right to redefine what it means to be a man. Truth be told, they have been trying to do that for a long time. And by doing so they are screw up a lot of good young men.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 01:58 PM
15

Do you hate women? This is starting to become a weekly thread. No. However there are a few here that seem to have some real issues as a result of being very badly burned by a gender biased system. Did you develop your views because you've been burned in the past? I haven't really been badly burned. But I do feel like I have been poorly led astray by listening to feminists concerns. What "feminists" want and what women really want are two entirely different things. I could have really done withou…
/r/MensRights30/09/10 01:16 PM
15

I resent that my mother had that done to me.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 11:31 AM
2

What do you think happens to people who argue with cops. Of course the parents were too intimidated to protest. So they just video taped it.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 11:51 AM
5

It's good to see this is being looked into more carefully. I wonder if the boy still has charges pending.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 11:28 AM
5

I know laws very by state. Is that how it plays out in that state?
/r/MensRights26/09/10 09:17 PM
76

The full quote of interest from the article: After the incident was reported to police internal affairs, the boy was arrested for unlawful sexual intercourse, which is a misdemeanor for consensual sex between two minors of a similar age. If the prosecutors found a "crime" then why was only the boy arrested and not the girl?
/r/MensRights26/09/10 08:36 PM
1

I say we demand equal access to female locker rooms.
/r/MensRights25/09/10 08:56 AM
3

Because they started letting reporters into the locker room in the first place. Once that happened then women had to have equal access. And then the video cameras followed the photographers in. This whole issue is stupid from the get go. If they want to have a reporter-player relationship they can just have an extra room attached to the locker room from players & reporters to talk. Case closed.
/r/MensRights24/09/10 06:58 PM
5

If you want to make a point. Try being concise.
/r/MensRights24/09/10 06:42 AM
9

So for you misogynists, that means only 3 billion hated females left to kill, right ? That statement says a heck of a lot more about you than it does us. The next time you band around the term misogynist, look up the term misandrist and look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights24/09/10 05:35 AM
19

I have no issue with women. But I do take issue with a lot of abuse that gets perpetrated in the name of feminism. To be fair, there are a large number of feminists who really do care about equality and fairness. But they don't seem to be the ones driving that train.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 10:24 PM
1

It doesn't. 1 rabid feminist, 1 jilted group and revenge.
/r/MensRights29/08/10 10:28 PM
44

Both women have already admitted to consenual sex with Julian Assange. Right now the women's lawyer is trying to get Julian charged with rape in both cases & making accusations in the press. In one instance, it's turns out it's just a broken condom. In the other, they didn't wear a condom in the morning. This turns into "rape" after the two women find out about each other.
/r/MensRights29/08/10 08:51 AM
1

Nothing to an idiot like you.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 03:49 PM
0

Admin updates here: http://nicholasmead.com/2010/08/21/how-to-smear-a-hero/
/r/MensRights22/08/10 07:50 AM
8

We don't have enough facts in this case. I don't know a whole lot about he Swedish judicial system, but if their standards of evidence are similar to the US, both situations would require proof to convict in court. Just because you don't have sufficient proof to convict someone of rape, doesn't automatically mean you have sufficient proof someone has made a false claim. It's a bitch, but we can't run around throwing people in jail without proof.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 07:48 AM
-3

One of the accusers is evidently as self described feminist. Google Cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jTgXIFL2vqQJ:annaardin.wordpress.com/+annaardin.wordpress.com&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a Google Translate: http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwebcache.googleusercontent.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcache%3AjTgXIFL2vqQJ%3Aannaardin.wordpress.com%2F%2Bannaardin.wordpress.com%26cd%3D1%26hl%3Den%26ct%3Dclnk%…
/r/MensRights21/08/10 06:35 PM
1

It was already submitted a few months ago.
/r/MensRights21/08/10 05:18 PM
1

I don't read swedish, so I am reliant on other's. I'll let you did through the news threads but the crown's website have dropped charges.
/r/MensRights21/08/10 05:17 PM
8

I'd also like to remind people that in Sweden, women get paid insurance money for merely accusing rape. They don't have to be right or prove their case. This came up with the recent accusations from the scam being run be a Swedish women in the Greek isles. http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/08/10/swedish-woman-running-rape-scam-on-greek-island/
/r/MensRights21/08/10 04:09 PM
-4

Update http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article7652935.ab Woman in question (30yo) correcting things from articles (according to her): 30yo was not raped, only molested other woman (20-30yo) was raped Does NOT feel threatened. It is "entirely incorrect" that [we] are afraid of Julian Assange. He is not violent and [I] do not feel threatened by him. In both cases it's consensual sex that then started "at a later stage" being rape/molestation WTF?!!? Not staged by pentagon
/r/MensRights21/08/10 04:07 PM
0

Strange sense of the world. I have no qualms about ordering a screw driver when ever I feel like it. Or just about any other beverage of choice. Let's look down the list: Jello Shots... When those come out they seem to be just as eagerly consumed by both men & women. "Anything blended unless you are on a beach"... nice qualifier they had to toss in there. "Anything with an obscene amount of garnish" I can't think of any. Only certain types of holiday bars throw in a bunch of frilly stuff on a dr…
/r/MensRights21/08/10 04:55 AM
11

Hey. Adult circumcision is cool with me. But most circumcision is done to helpless babies.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 09:24 PM
3

I cannot for one moment believe this is true in any way. Other studies give a death toll of over 117 babies a year. Just because I want to believe your statement because it supports my views, doesn't mean I am going to. Do you have any documentation to back up your claim?
/r/MensRights17/08/10 08:38 PM
10

So why not do it when a boy reaches the age of sexual maturity instead of mutilating the genitals of a helpless baby? (I know, the baby can't fight back or complain.)
/r/MensRights17/08/10 08:36 PM
1

Pretty atrocious. But what is the relevance to men's rights?
/r/MensRights16/08/10 07:58 PM
2

are sometimes place And the sometimes bit gets harder to play with. And does that even happen in the UK? You can't compare apples to apples when you are playing with different sets of national laws. For this to be of any use, you have to compare two sets nearly equal behavior with different outcomes.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 11:46 AM
9

but she's right. It's not feminism. Well then she better inform all of feminist as a good portion of them didn't get the message.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 07:47 PM
23

Here is a spicy example where they complain about Men's Rights Advocates marginalizing spousal abuse while they marginalize abuse against men. http://jezebel.com/5397939/the-misguided-message-of-mens-rights-groups
/r/MensRights14/08/10 07:26 PM
25

Hi. Welcome. There are women who hate men. I am not one of them, and that is not feminism. You can look up the definition if you'd like, a feminist is someone who fights for gender equality, which includes men's rights. I'm glad you have the right idea. I am sure you have observed by now that just about every female view point gets lumped in with feminism and many women will proclaim their righteousness of their views by saying that they are a feminist. While some of the quieter people under the…
/r/MensRights14/08/10 07:11 PM
1

She performed a sex act on a man at the memorial.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 05:02 PM
5

More details here: http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/blackpoolnews/Woman-convicted-of-desecrating-Cenotaph.6475415.jp But I still fail to see how this is relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/08/10 05:01 PM
1

Many others will probably have more suggestions than I do. The 'cocky funny' stuff tends to turn people into jerk wads. What you need to do is get comfortable talking to people period. So here it is: Start talking to people. Anyone & everyone. Male, female, young and old. Start off easy with people like the check out person at the grocery store. Or the person sitting next to you on the bus. The person standing next to you in line. The point is to get over your phobia of talking with people and t…
/r/seduction13/08/10 08:40 PM
1

I don't wear a t-shirt to bed because it gets too hot. I suppose I could try that, though. Yes. Give that a shot for a month and see how things go. Report back so we know how it went.
/r/seduction13/08/10 06:04 PM
1

Gotta ask. Are you using steroids? If so, this is the cause.
/r/seduction13/08/10 05:23 PM
1

Many people have stated that for facial acne that placing a fresh towel over the pillow each night has significantly reduced acne. Now let's think about your chest. Do you wear a clean shirt each day? What about during workouts (are you wearing the same skunky T-shirt over & over)? What about to bed (Consider wearing a fresh clean T-shirt each night)? Also, make sure you change towels at least once a week. Give this a try for a month before going for the heavy medication.
/r/seduction13/08/10 05:21 PM
11

(Also, with people who don't know me well, it makes for awesome first impressions and conversations.) So save it for when you are going solo. A friend of mine who got into PUA stuff turned into a real asshole creep. I got rid of him as fast as I could. The whole cocky-funny thing is useful for wall flowers to break out of their shell and become more confident. It's somewhat helpful to overshoot a first to get used to just getting out, talking to people, starting conversations. Once you have that…
/r/seduction12/08/10 06:53 PM
2

The obvious thing is to check the credit cards to see if any purchases have been made (gas etc).
/r/MensRights12/08/10 08:19 AM
2

How did she empty the bank accounts? If she did it by check, you can dispute it with the bank and say it is invalid. The bank will charge back the money.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 08:02 AM
2

No. Here would be a current example. http://jezebel.com/5609338/mtv-seems-to-think-violence-against-men-is-okay But I have to say it seems very rare. Edit: Scratch that. It was originally published by The Gloss. But I will give Jezebel props for republishing it.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 10:14 PM
1

Some feminists insist that men who fight for equal rights be called misogynists. Despite the historical negative connotation of the term. Misogyny is pretty much associated with an abuse of power. It would be like me insisting that all feminists are misandrist by definition. I recognize that this is wrong, but some feminists relish is bashing & labeling men.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 10:10 PM
7

yet I take some issue with your statement that feminists blame men for their troubles. Soo... you have never heard the terms "misogynist" or "patriarchal society"? They are banned about quite liberally. Edit: Don't forget the liberal blaming of "white men" for all that is bad. On another note, where do you think the institutionalized bias against men originates from? Is this a consequence of certain feminist actions? Some of it is based on outdated assumptions of the roles between women & men in…
/r/MensRights10/08/10 10:01 PM
2

What's wrong with Feminism? Feminism is a huge umbrella that just about any idea or agenda females wish to propagate fit under. Some of them shoot for equality. Others push heavily biased hateful agendas. Feminism is that everything in the fridge just got cleaned out, thrown in a pot and called it stew, but there is a lot of rotten meat & veggies spoiling it from the get-go. But if feminism were to diminish from public discourse, how would women be able to express their thoughts on these issues?…
/r/MensRights10/08/10 09:57 PM
1

Not sure what this has to do with the topic but, your myth link is a myth. http://www.theforensicexaminer.com/archive/spring09/15/ http://llr.lls.edu/volumes/v33-issue3/greer.pdf
/r/MensRights10/08/10 08:31 PM
0

Nice strawwoman argument you knocked down there.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 10:31 PM
1

But instead of treating rape-prevention posters as a personal attack on you, try feeling some real empathy for victims of rape and sexual abuse. Fuck that. They need better posters. They need to learn when they are degrading an entire gender. It's not all about you. Stop raping me with you unreasonable demand. NO means NO. What don't you understand. Instead, we have a subreddit dedicated to moaning about how "I'M not a rapist! Stop demonizing me!" while women are raped every day without respite.…
/r/MensRights09/08/10 10:28 PM
1

But they will stop a drunk guy at a frat party from agreeing to have sex with his drunk friend. So why don't we have similar PSA's for women that they would be rapists if they are drunk and agree to have sex with his drunk friend?
/r/MensRights09/08/10 10:24 PM
0

OK. Hey! Look at me. I'm actively not raping a woman right now. Wheeee! Just because you would never do it doesn't mean your buddy wouldn't. WTF should I do. Go over and accuse him of being a potential rapist too? Fucking stupid degrading promotion.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 10:18 PM
4

I think you would have to talk to a lawyer to sue. Probably not worth it.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 12:39 AM
6

I don't know about that. You can't discriminate based on gender. There was a recent discrimination lawsuit about bars charging men twice as much and the bars lost.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 12:39 AM
3

I would wait a month or two. I don't know if she actually has committed a crime yet or not. But once she tries to pass off that photocopy as legit, she has clearly committed a crime.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 08:58 PM
3

Odds are he isn't paying that right now. But it sounds like someone is trying to make an adjustment so the change hasn't taken affect yet. He should keep paying what he was ordered to do, but take that to his lawyer.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 08:51 PM
4

The judge is retired. http://louismartinetbr.com/luke.htm This is the website for the family court: http://www.familycourt.org/
/r/MensRights07/08/10 08:49 PM
5

Here is the Judge's name: Luke A. LaVergne He is retired: http://louismartinetbr.com/luke.htm And here is the Baton Rouge Family Court where he originally placed this order: http://www.familycourt.org/
/r/MensRights07/08/10 08:44 PM
0

Backup copy: http://i.imgur.com/w8eex.jpg
/r/MensRights07/08/10 08:38 PM
0

Where is the r/Pics posting?
/r/MensRights07/08/10 08:37 PM
7

What should I do Men's Rights? Stop posting the same question in every forum.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 06:26 PM
19

...she got caught.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 07:47 AM
1

Your a troll.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 01:52 AM
2

This was already submitted & deleted from this subreddit. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cxpdd/article_10_things_men_and_boys_can_do_to_stop/ My opinion is the same. Oh, real good. Way to get their message out there by publishing it is Ms.Magazine. All that does is turn it into a male bashing exercise.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 06:26 PM
13

Well your lawyer is going to give you better legal advice than anyone here. How on earth did some kid jacking off, & you immediately leave the room turn into a sexual abuse claim against you?
/r/MensRights05/08/10 06:19 PM
4

Some people would think twice, but would recognize that she is an adult and is entitled to fuck up her life any way she deems fit.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 06:12 PM
14

Sounds so absurd, I have to assume this is a troll. If not, get a lawyer & don't talk to the police or anyone about this until it is resolved in court.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 06:10 PM
9

15 & 20 is pushing it don't you think.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 05:37 PM
1

Oh, real good. Way to get their message out there by publishing it is Ms.Magazine. All that does is turn it into a male bashing exercise.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:49 PM
2

Is there any article associated with this or are you just pulling it out of your rear end? Let's rewrite this line & see if you think it still is fair or accurate: Feminists are unconcerned about life endangering child obesity that kills Millions every year. Men's Rights Activists are unconcerned about life endangering child obesity that kills Millions every year. I'm no fan of feminists, but let focus on the problems they are causing instead of the problems they are not solving. Because the las…
/r/MensRights01/08/10 08:44 PM
1

Looks like her "charity" has already gone down the shiter. www.LorenasRedWagon.com Edit: Nope, still up. Just slow. Lorena was a victim of domestic violence herself - everyone has read the headlines and remembers the stand that Lorena took against domestic violence years ago.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 02:58 PM
-3

The post itself, of course. Oh. That wasn't obvious because you linked to a comment. That comment is a pretty good explanation of the basis of double standards in attributing gender attributes. In a men's rights forum why are the majority of votes going against a post pointing out a double standard that disadvantages men? In the example you noted, all the author of the parent thread submitted was this statement: It's been asserted that the liberal worldview embraces two apparently mutually exclu…
/r/MensRights01/08/10 01:47 AM
-3

You linked to a comment. Are you complaining about the comment's vote status or the topic's vote status?
/r/MensRights01/08/10 01:28 AM
-3

That comment had a net 20 positive upvotes? What's your problem?
/r/MensRights01/08/10 01:21 AM
5

My 2 cents - Dissent & opposing opinions are important. Without people challenging our ideas, we will end up just as off base & destructive as the feminist movement. I don't want mensrights to turn into a circlejerk. And quite frankly I see a lot of circlejerking as it is.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 04:33 PM
3

by age 85 by age 85 by age 85 Yes. By the time you die half will have contracted cancer. Humans were not designed to live this long. We are built to reproduce & give our offspring a successful start. We are going to die of something! Cancer is just one of the ways our bodies give out. Every man will die before they reach the age of 140! Public emergency! Public crisis!
/r/MensRights31/07/10 05:19 AM
11

We have far less information than the judge or jury. But it certainly does sound confusing to have that sandwiched in between two bouts of consensual sex.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 02:00 AM
3

Find a new girlfriend.
/r/seduction30/07/10 04:09 AM
3

Seems like the smarter solution is if he is too senile to control himself to place him in a facility that only has male care takers. Also, does an insanity defense not work with someone already known to have dementia? Soon we would have all our old folks in prison. They are in homes for a reason.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 11:07 PM
-8

Wednesday, Mar. 15, 2006
/r/MensRights25/07/10 03:47 PM
14

Reciprocation.
/r/seduction25/07/10 01:21 AM
16

Murder is a dicey subject.
/r/MensRights24/07/10 04:43 PM
2

Agreed. Feminist advice really fucked me over.
/r/seduction23/07/10 01:15 AM
6

For problems that cannot be resolved by the voting system.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:46 PM
2

The voting system works as the moderation.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 06:29 PM
23

Is it really that big of a deal? If they are trolls, the comments will just get downvoted.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 05:32 PM
-1

Please stop bashing on 2XC. There are actually a good group of sane, mentally healthy, common sense women who post there & dominate that crowd. The real nutters tend to congregate in mass in a few other subreddits.
/r/MensRights19/07/10 10:19 PM
4

Look we want people who actually go out & rape to be brought to justice. We also want people who make false rape accusations to be brought to justice. We also want young teens of similar age who have sex which is by everyone's measure consensual if it were not for statutory laws not to be brought up on rape charges if the parent becomes upset. I don't know what your personal issues are, but they are your's not ours since you clearly seem unbalanced.
/r/MensRights17/07/10 01:32 PM
5

Look. This isn't about blaming men. It's about finding one of the root causes of some of these false rape accusations. Women tend to be far more vicious about this slut/whore thing than guys. There is no reason we should contribute to deriding healthy natural human nature.
/r/MensRights16/07/10 07:53 PM
4

I'm with you on this one. The more we can put an end to this shame factor on women who are doing just the same stuff we want to do, the less likely future generations will feel obliged to blame their sexual desires & actions on someone else.
/r/MensRights16/07/10 07:52 PM
6

I'm glad she is serving time at all.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 02:41 PM
2

Maybe people thought other people said it better above.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 02:08 AM
7

She is leaving you as soon as she is done with school. She is using you right now. Leave her before she gets violent again. It's not right, but if the cops were called you would be in jail right now. She can pretty much beat the shit out of you any way she wants, but if you touch her, you are the violent male aggressor. Leave NOW.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 02:07 AM
17

Sounds fair. Now all they need to do is to impose a law requiring 80% of all woman must work a full time job.
/r/MensRights12/07/10 10:30 AM
4

If the media covered architecture the same way they covered feminism, all we'd ever see is endless rehashed coverage of the small number of poorly built bridges that collapsed throughout history. If the media covered feminism the same way they covered architecture we might actually have more balanced & critical reviews.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 08:20 PM
10

Nagoski does have a point about describing something as gross in a science magazine as being unprofessional, no matter what sex the author is describing. Yes. But she then undermined her own point by doing the same but only when applied to the other gender.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 06:50 PM
1

So what if it gets upvoted. What I was disappointed about was the lack of skepticism.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 03:04 AM
2

Ta-ta Adolf. Next time try arguing the subject rather than just comparing people to racists.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 02:18 AM
4

Nah. I figure if you are going to run around and accuse people of being racists will-nilly the same standard should apply to you. So go ahead and goose-step your ass out of here Hitler.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 12:16 AM
3

Sorry. Go start your own KKK subreddit somewhere else.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 11:44 PM
17

I've got to ask, how is this an example of double standards?
/r/MensRights08/07/10 10:50 AM
1

While we may agree with the comparison, the extreme use of hyperbole will not win sympathy to the cause. That same video above would have been much more effective without having called it slavery. People & groups who use such extreme hyperbole come off looking like nuts. We want people to pay attention to the message, not be distracted from it.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 06:35 AM
4

My problem now is that the arbitrator, for some reason gave her the kids for the month of July, minus one weekend for me. And you have 11 days to her 3 days for the rest of the year. You need to know when you have it good. Yesterday marked the longest the kids have been away from me at any time since they were born. They called me Saturday crying and wanting to come home, but mom wouldn't let them. As much as you may not like your ex-wife, she is their mother. And they need to spend some time wi…
/r/MensRights07/07/10 01:51 AM
3

So? He's dead. If the kid is his, he deserve a decent start in life. It's not like the dead guy is going to be using the money or anything.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 11:22 AM
6

OK. I'm going to make a few guesses. I bet there is already research out there that we can dig up. Focus on sports as a way to succeed (for poorer populations). Not everyone can become a professional athlete. How schools deal with ADD/Hyperactive boys. Younger kids need to get out and burn off excess energy. In the earlier grades, two recesses I think is still a good idea. Absolutely nothing beats parental involvement in getting kids educated. Even with shitty schools or teachers, the parent is …
/r/MensRights05/07/10 11:02 PM
7

Keep in mind that the article title is a bit more attention grabbing. What it is suggesting is that the type of help being provided is counter productive. It concludes: “The strategies recommended have been divisive and often counter-productive in terms of their emphasis on gender differences and give the impression that all that was needed was to treat the two sexes as separate, homogenous groups.”
/r/MensRights05/07/10 10:56 PM
5

Holy shit. Someone wants to do something proactive & positive here! Good questions to start off with.
/r/MensRights05/07/10 10:50 PM
22

what do you define feminism as? I don't. It's all over the map. I've always thought of it as a supporter for equal rights for women and men, and nothing beyond that Most people who support equal rights for both women & men just say they are for equal rights. There are feminists that say they are for equal rights for women, but have very little concern about equal rights be applied towards men. Let's face it. Feminism is... well all about females.
/r/MensRights05/07/10 06:59 AM
5

No. This is an important issue. I agree with FingerOfDeath. False accusations are devastating for all involved. More research needs to be done in this area in order to elicit what has really happened (or not happened). Aiming for better accuracy in pedo convictions is something no one should be against.
/r/MensRights04/07/10 10:38 PM
1

OK. Be the doormat.
/r/MensRights04/07/10 12:28 PM
1

I could have used a little more visual evidence.
/r/MensRights04/07/10 03:18 AM
12

The question is, what should we be doing about this? It's got to stop. Next time a woman gives a man the evil eye for being a normal father to his child, I think that father should walk up to that woman and address her behavior directly. This passive bullshit is what allows it to continue.
/r/MensRights02/07/10 12:42 PM
5

I don't care if male or female. This copyright fascism has been taken too far and needs to be reigned in with some common sense. And if it takes her counter lawsuit to do so, I greatly encourage it.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 02:07 AM
8

I think you are looking for this forum: http://www.reddit.com/r/circlejerk
/r/MensRights27/06/10 10:00 PM
1

If the parents had other issues, them maybe it was he right choice. BTW, when I made my pancake run as a toddler I was only wearing my pajamas too. How are parents supposed to prevent their kids from waking up before they do and heading out of the house? Lock them in their room and wait for a fire? As far as I am concerned this stuff just happens until the toddler learns that they aren't supposed to leave the house and wander around without permission. Feet, hands & curiousity are going to beat …
/r/MensRights27/06/10 02:54 AM
3

I wondered off when I was that old one morning. I ended up getting pancakes at my neighbors. Should this really be a legal problem for parents? I kind of feel like our society is turning parents into automatic criminals just for normal stuff that happens. There better be more to this story.
/r/MensRights27/06/10 12:06 AM
5

I wouldn't report her for emotional abuse. But go ahead and call them & complain that she won't let you see your father on a regular basis. Things may work out from there.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 09:36 PM
8

Your father would go to jail for a very long time if he did that. There are other ways.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 09:34 PM
5

Go down to the family court house. Wait all day in the court. At the end of the day the judge will notice you and ask why you are waiting. Tell the judge you want court ordered time with your father. I think something might work out from there.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 09:32 PM
3

No, because pregnancy is hard to fake. Who was pregnant?
/r/MensRights20/06/10 07:03 PM
1

Regardless of what really happened, if this guy gets off the hook, does this entice more people to run red lights & ignore cops? http://www.newschannel9.com/news/couple-992252-emergency-wife.html
/r/MensRights20/06/10 06:55 PM
1

Here is my thought on terms like feminatzi. Sure, it may feel good to say. But when I look at how far out some of the branches of the feminists get, I think we can be better than they are as a group. Using stereotypes & degrading terms won't help us to assert fair or equal rights. I'd rather see men get a fair shake in custody hearings.
/r/MensRights20/06/10 07:06 AM
16

Neglected to mention the assault to police when first questioned. People who are sexually assaulted by a family member are not apt to talk about it. No mention of any charges placed against the family member who allegedly tried to assault her. It could have happened. It might not have. Sexual assault within the family is rarely brought up or prosecuted. It might also be a question of how far it went before she ran. It's usually kept as a dirty family secret. Police typically are reluctant to pre…
/r/MensRights20/06/10 06:11 AM
0

BackinBiz, You are right. This so sounds like the typical behavior that men would initiate. I can't tell you how many times I get pissed with a friend and I resort to this kind of petty passive-aggressive behavior. When men get together to watch sports games, it's all but impossible to stop them from acting this way. It was my observation in my own marriage that as time passed, our favorite sport became doing little things that annoyed each other. Or, more accurately, not ceasing the doing of li…
/r/MensRights18/06/10 07:51 PM
1

It's simple. Don't F With Me And I Won't F With You. It was my observation in my own marriage that as time passed, our favorite sport became doing little things that annoyed each other. Or, more accurately, not ceasing the doing of little things that annoyed. Toilet seats not down. Asking questions you already know the answers to. Using spiteful names that really got under the other's skin. Silence. Loud TV's. Low TV's. Etc. Wow. Of course the above described petty passive-aggressive behavior is…
/r/MensRights18/06/10 07:36 PM
10

The Families and Work Institute, for instance, puts fathers at three hours and mothers at 3.8 hours with kids under 13, while Census Bureau time-use surveys found that married men spend about 1.2 hours per weekday caring for children under age 6, while married women spend 2.6 hours on the same activity. Self assessments of time use are bound to be hard to account for. The selection pools for each of these studies are very different. First time fathers in the Boston area (which has a much higher …
/r/MensRights18/06/10 06:53 PM
5

One point he made that I think is pretty foolish: Women can't handle true equality. Sure they can, if it is forced on them. But I largely suspect that they don't really want the full burden. They want to play the benefits of both sides of the coin where they see fit. Also use of terms like feminatzi, while perhaps amusing to some, makes the arguments made less effective & actual turns people off. It's better to simply describe the poor behavior that to dish out insulting terms.
/r/MensRights18/06/10 09:01 AM
4

How many children? How much is major amounts?
/r/MensRights17/06/10 08:31 PM
5

Vindictive guy now either denies any of the expense are valid (on a regular basis), or decides that the kid only probably consumes 1/16 of a gallon of milk. Now we have a bunch of back & forth between two people who were separated for a reason. The court also decides that the man now needs to show the ex-wife all of his receipts & expenses just to be fair about the invasion of privacy. Look. I'm all for reforming the current system, but you need to think through everything. Personally, I would l…
/r/MensRights17/06/10 05:09 PM
2

It's going very well for me. It's also helping me reduce my total debt, letting me know where I'm poorly spending money, and letting me accumulate savings. But I guess fiscal responsibility isn't something we're supposed to be encouraging huh? I've done that for a while too. Unless you are in debt, the process just isn't all that worth while to continue forever. Won't somebody think of the children? That wasn't my plea. I was noting that other people my actually give a shit about the administrat…
/r/MensRights17/06/10 04:42 PM
4

What level of documentation are you talking about? Are you saying every penny? If so, track ALL of your expenses for three months and tell me how that goes. I can do it for a short while, and it's a good experiment. But it is also a major pain in the ass & time consuming. Now I understand you don't care how much time it may take the other person, but not everyone involved in this process is going to be so cold & indifferent. Tracking income sources is easy. There are only a few of those. Expense…
/r/MensRights17/06/10 03:02 PM
5

It chews up a lot of time. The person getting child support could just throw in a portion of rent + assumption of food & clothing and that could be over & above the amount contributed. You have already lost this argument. Now what does peeve me is that there is no expectation for the person receiving child support to spend any of their own money. That is what needs to change.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 02:15 PM
2

Don't assume that just because they are strong and work the doors that all bouncers are idiots. Especially the ones at the higher end night clubs. Think about it. You are surrounded by flocks of girls dressed to the nines all begging for your attention & permission to get in. That's a seduction power play right there. Don't hate. Replicate.
/r/seduction16/06/10 11:59 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 11:35 PM
1

that's a pretty big strawfeminist you're building there. Ah, but aren't they all at heart?
/r/MensRights16/06/10 07:48 PM
-1

It would be more interesting to repost to r/feminism to hear about how that kid was a rapist and it was a good thing he was apprehended.
/r/MensRights15/06/10 09:56 PM
37

The referenced post appears to be more of an invitation to joing r/equality. Also, why sweat the occassional troll. Isn't that what downvotes are for. Community moderation works.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 02:24 PM
3

I find this justifed. Court orders only keep sane law abiding people away. If there is some psycho out there trying to get at his ex-wife or ex-girlfriend, some will stop at next to nothing to find out where she is. The absolute only way to keep them safe is to not tell ANYONE including women who don't work there, where the location is. Once you start blabbing to one person, the cat is out of the bag. This is a case of security by obscurity.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 02:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter