TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fitzmimmons Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by fitzmimmons on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm trying to address the stereotypes that have been enforced on our young boys for a while now. I'm sorry that you live in France and don't get to see these things up close but they are here and they do happen. Bravery, culture, self-discipline, and manners are not the messages that boys get here. At one point, maybe, but what they are getting now is supremely distorted. Instead, there are things like negging, hazing, and binge-drinking to show off their 'masculinity'. Maybe this is a result of…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:30 PM
1

It could be argued that we are all controllers, since these gender roles are still being enforced but no one is really winning so instead it just seems to be like a snake eating its tail.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:18 PM
1

Seriously? Chill. Okay, first, maybe instead of reading an article that only take small pieces of a book--out of context--and argues based on these statements, you should read the whole thing. I don't have it in front of me but from what I remember, this statement is taken from a chapter talking about a campus gang-rape and how some parents were treating the rapists as 'boys will be boys' and explaining away the victim. Something like, "Oh, she was drunk at a party. If she is going to give it aw…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:14 PM
5

""Traditional masculinity", like "traditional femininity", is a form of social control, and seeking to reassert that control is no answer to a generation of young men who are quietly drowning in a world that doesn't seem to want them." This is the part that is important. If you take anything away from this article, let it be this. Not all boys want to be cowboys, just like not all girls want to be princesses. What gets us into trouble is trying to categorize and blame people for not fitting the …
/r/MensRights19/05/13 10:45 PM
11

Extending on your comment, the graph also does not take in socioeconomic disparities and other issues that lead to fatherless vs. motherless homes. The conditions leading to homelessness or running away are also important--we can't necessarily assume that it is the fault of the parent that the child ran away. This graph seems to have taken a lot of work but no threshed out all the the important details.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 10:23 PM
1

So you are saying that he did something 'right' because it will lead to laws being created? I'm very concerned.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:19 AM
1

Possibly, depending on what they decide to prosecute with. If they are going to charge him with attempted murder (as knowingly switching medication could be), it isn't too far reaching. If they go with assault/fraud, it is way too much.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:18 AM
10

How, in any possible scenario, is what he (allegedly) did 'right'?
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:11 PM
9

If it is true that he did this, it is horrible not matter how you look at it. It is her body and her decision on whether she wanted to keep the baby or not. Even if she hadn't been pregnant, switching someone's medication is labelled as fraud and it possibly assault/attempted murder in this case, as she could have been seriously injured.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 03:10 PM
1

Drew Peterson then? I mean, there are going to be cases where people lie and lie and lie continuously, regardless of gender. I'm not sure it is quite fair to separate malicious people in such a way.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 12:39 PM
3

OJ?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:25 PM
1

It's all about context. There are always going to be those who don't understand how something is to be read/heard/seen and just run with the understanding that they have created. Kind of makes sharing ideas difficult.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:50 AM
1

Wait, seriously? You made an argument basically saying that it isn't the fault of the rapist because he just wanted to avoid blue balls? While recognizing that it is wrong? I'm so confused. I'm not sure if you are pissed because someone just turned you down or if you just wanted to share your wealth of knowledge about how sex organs and hormones function. Either way, that shit is uncalled for. Legal punishment? What the actual fuck is wrong with you? Heartbreak stimulates the same pain centers b…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:44 AM
9

Exactly. Though information on child abuse is correct, no one is saying that the children are 'asking for it' or have ways to defend themselves so it doesn't really work here.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 08:56 PM
45

I always believed it to be satirical in nature, to counter the 'don't dress so scandalously' arguments aimed at rape victims.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 08:52 PM
13

There's a difference, of course. It's just that r/MensRights tends to lump all feminists together and treat them as if they are what is causing all the horrible things in the world. (As you can see above, where we are likened to the KKK. You know, people who killed and tortured people. For funsies!) Sometimes, this place is a cesspool of hatred. Pretty much, "Someone did something shitty and I'm going to blame feminism!" and the like. Sometimes, this is an eye-opening, discussion based sub. I th…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:20 PM
3

You should still recognize that women were doing the jobs that they needed to do to help the war effort. So what if a lot of them were desk jobs? They were jobs that needed doing.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:30 PM
0

"That you have encountered" I'm sorry but there are so many of us out there. Myself in particular? Fighting for parental leave for BOTH parents, whoever wants to stay with the kid. Fighting against gender stereotypes. Fighting for bisexual men to be seen as real, alive, and kicking. By saying that all feminists act in this way, you are hurting our efforts for you. Anything we say is suddenly under scrutiny and can be taken so far out of context that it looks horrendous. I mean, if I based my vie…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:25 PM
1

Well, it is the same argument that Beverly Tatum uses with racism. Her definition of racism is one that uses power and privilege. Meaning that African-Americans (and other racial minorities) cannot truly be racist because they get nothing out of it, they do not benefit from it. In theory, it would work with sexism but with the change in social structure it is hard to see. There are still a lot of privileges that men have over women but sexism goes both ways, especially since our society still ha…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:14 PM
1

Dude
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:00 PM
1

While I feel that all violence is wrong, situations of self-defense are ones in which violence may be necessary--regardless of the sex of the victim. The base problem with the thinking that men can't be raped, is that these people can't see men as victims because they believe all men to be physically stronger and more able to 'defeat' an attacker. I strongly suggest reading 'Guyland' as it looks into the way society views men and how it affects boys growing up in it. Much of this is reinforced b…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:50 PM
1

Society is less likely to believe a male is (or can be) raped, unfortunately. And yes, there are girls who will do this but people do shitty things everyday. Most girls will not call something that they regret rape but I am not naive enough to think that there are not some who would. However, there are guys who will stalk drunken women and wait until they can't say no. That isn't okay.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:05 PM
1

Dear lord people, all I was trying to get across is the 'Yes does not ALWAYS mean yes'. There are gray areas and I get that but everyone seemed to be taking it from the stance of 'Bitches be crazy, how dare they think I can read minds?'. I was addressing that.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:56 PM
1

If she were to take advantage of his intoxicated state then, yes, she would be the rapist in this situation.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:14 AM
-1

Yes. Yes, it does. If someone is obviously intoxicated or in a state of vulnerability, it is not okay to throw yourself at them. And don't call me 'cupcake'.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:06 AM
2

But we are assuming that people can understand the point. We forget that sometimes we have to pick it apart and feed it to them before the lightbulb goes off. People also tend to get upset before they think and things like this post happen.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:31 AM
0

No, that's not what anyone wants. It is talking about the coerced yes. Where someone is heavily intoxicated or has been drugged. Perhaps they consented when they were not fully aware of the situation.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:21 AM
-1

Why is it that your post isn't one of the top ones?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:08 AM
0

See, I came to this subreddit thinking that this would be a legitimate place for discussion. Seeing that you have so many downvotes at this point, I feel that this is not the case and I should run for the hills. This is quite obviously what is being stated, that rapists still get away because 'she/he said yes' while drugged or intoxicated.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:07 AM
1

There have actually been a few articles about this trend specifically. It's not that like there aren't women who want to be in these careers, but that they are still trying to tear down the walls of what they are told as children is 'feminine' and belongs to them. Walk down a toy store 'girls' aisle. It is getting better but girls are still being told that babies and homemaking are their primary goals. Women are more likely to apply for secretarial and HR positions because it is what is expected…
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:05 PM
3

I'm extremely confused about what you are trying to say.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter