TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fiveisafemme Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by fiveisafemme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The people calling EITHER PERSON IN THIS SCENARIO are completely diluting and obscuring the meaning of the word rape, and it's disgusting. Both the conversation here (calling her a rapist) and the conversation there (calling him a rapist) are COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS and ABSURD and a huge factor in why no one can have a reasonable discussion about what rape ACTUALLY is.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:12 PM
1

I like the point you're making, but would just like to be a little nitpicky and point out that it's ALSO about trust. If someone's spouse has sex with someone else when the relationship is built on monogamy it's an entirely different situation than if a person's non monogamous spouse has sex with someone else. The issue with "cheating" is more about betrayal of trust than jealousy I'd say.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:50 AM
4

I was going to say something related to this--it sees more like she was visibly upset, and thus not driving as well, rather than she got pulled over and then started to cry. Not that the former should be an excuse anyway, but the point wasn't "i should be able to cry my way out of a ticket" but rather "I was upset and not thinking as clearly as I could have and the cop should have taken that into consideration before ticketing me."
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:15 PM
2

There's a similar policy in the state of new jersey--fairly recently they passed a law altering the "provisions" a driver with a provisional license (typically meaning they've had their license less than a year) must follow. The new rules are something like you can only drive with one other person in the car (ever, not just after a certain hour) INCLUDING family members and other fully licensed drivers (where you used to be able to have your whole family plus a non related person if you wanted),…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 12:53 PM
2

I suppose a better word would be discussion...and whether it's particularly pleasant or not, argumentation is a very good thing for any movement. I don't really think anyone benefits from being in an environment where everyone agrees unanimously on everything and are just echoing one another--then you end up with a community like SRS, which is very unpleasant and stagnant. I guess my point is that i don't argue simply for the sake of arguing, but rather, to get a better understanding and develop…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:33 PM
4

In the past i have asked this exact question, and have never asked it for any other reason than i was genuinely curious. I believe the last thing that I had that question for was a photo of women's underwear that said "stop staring" on the ass or something like that. I was genuinely curious, and so, I asked. You make a lot of assumptions, and I guess these assumptions aren't about me because if i were to get an explanation I'd either a) accept it or b) question it further, but neither of these t…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:19 PM
3

God, her responses are absolutely rage inducing.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:39 AM
28

HE was not resisting. She was.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:20 AM
19

Are you serious? Why the fuck is this in men's rights?
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:11 AM
8

They are very obviously not worth taking seriously. It's not even worth thinking about.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 07:59 AM
-2

Silly me, i didn't see anything about that in the article.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 05:01 AM
-3

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights29/11/11 06:43 PM
3

I'm really sorry this happened to you. This is a perfect example of why exactly mensrights activists do and should exist. After a breakup, people of both sexes can go crazy and do stupid, vengeful, vindictive shit, but it should absolutely not be so easy for anyone to tear your life apart like she did. I hope you can follow the current top comment on this and get things sorted out for the better.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 04:40 PM
0

I really don't know. I can't get myself to fall on either side with this one. ON one hand she was definitely coerced, and this guy is pretty despicable for doing that to her, but on the other, she had a perfectly reasonable second option: have the cops deal with it. And she chose the sex act. I have trouble calling that rape. The thing that has me leaning towards calling it rape is the fact that she is so young and couldn't really think through the situation properly because of that.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 04:50 AM
1

I don't think anyone's saying it's "ok," rather that this isn't cut and dry rape. This dude is definitely a scumbag, but the question isn't "was his action wrong" but "was it rape"? I've been thinking about this thing all day, reading different comment threads all over the place and i'm still not sure if i think it's rape or not.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 02:41 AM
2

Things like this are why I read this board. It's nice to see something besides "SOME WOMAN SAID SOMETHING STUPID ON FACEBOOK! IMAGINE IF A MAN SAID IT!" This blog poster is absolutely retarded, as are some of the child support laws in our country, and this is absolutely one of the biggest issues men face today. Nice to see it brought to light.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 03:42 AM
1

It IS their fault. Why stay with a bad woman? Plenty of people here seem content with not being married/committed at all, so the option isn't "marry a good woman or a bad one" it's "marry a good woman or don't marry". Any person who willingly imposes the first option on themselves IS to blame for what may happen to them.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 12:47 AM
1

I didn't give any information about my sexual preference or experience in that comment, nor is it relevant. The fact that i may or may not like anal, facials, gang bangs, DP, bondage, torture, face fucking, etc, does not change the fact that many women do not, and in fact, find it demeaning. The fact that you think i "have not had enough adventurous sex" is completely irrelevant to the issue. And as far as i'm concerned, untrue, but that is, as i said, beside the point.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:16 PM
1

You make great points. I'm not sure about the fourth bullet point, since i don't really know of an applicable situation. I feel that one is too much speculation to really argue over anyhow. The only other argument i have is with the first bullet point, and at this point i know i'm really giving her the benefit of the doubt, but i'm reading what she says not as "women need to fix everything" but as "we need an equal number of men and women to balance each other out." Probably just because that's …
/r/MensRights01/07/11 02:49 AM
1

She very clearly states her issue with too much testosterone, and that is not that "maleness is icky," it's that it leads to an >"aggressive, greedy, testosterone-fuelled mood" aggressiveness is a trait that is VERY often associated particularly with maleness, whether or not the same can be said for greedy, or whether or not a "testosterone-fuelled" mood can be defined. Regardless, the point is simplifying and purposely trying to make her sound silly by saying she thinks maleness is "icky"--when…
/r/MensRights01/07/11 02:44 AM
5

Gender-dominated environments are not good Sounds to me like she's saying it's not a good idea for anything to be dominated by men OR women. Granted, she does make a point to establish the things that adding women would add to the financial sector, but this seems to me to be only because there are so few as it is. Looking at it from the flip side, if a particular sector of the economy or whatever was dominated by women she might have negative things to say about what happens when a group of wome…
/r/MensRights29/06/11 05:24 PM
1

The issue is that porn is not realistic, really. The fact that young and sexually inexperienced men might watch porn and view the acts portrayed (anal, DP, facials, etc) as desirable for women or commonplace, or acceptable to pursue without discussion, when in reality, many of these things are not enjoyed by a large number of women. It presents an unrealistic image of women as sex objects to be used in any way possible by the man present. I'd argue that porn, while not exactly demeaning for men …
/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:07 AM
1

The issue is that porn is not realistic, really. The fact that young and sexually inexperienced men might watch porn and view the acts portrayed (anal, DP, facials, etc) as desirable for women or commonplace, or acceptable to pursue without discussion, when in reality, many of these things are not enjoyed by a large number of women. It presents an unrealistic image of women as sex objects to be used in any way possible by the man present. I'd argue that porn, while not exactly demeaning for men …
/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:07 AM
1

I wasn't trying to blame the victim--i think he did the right thing and would encourage anyone to stick to their guns when they're rights are concerned. It's just that women tend to be less assertive in general and would probably be more likely to back down--and the cop reacted to the fact that he was challenged, not the fact that he was challenged by the man. It goes without saying that the victim didn't deserve to be shot simply for asking for a warrant, and i didn't mean to imply otherwise. S…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 01:27 AM
1

Do you think a woman would have been as likely to boldly stand up to a clearly out of control cop and say he needed a warrant? I think this cop would have attacked anyone who stood up against his authority. Because he is not sane.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 09:53 PM
1

This wasn't even a case of that, though i'm not arguing that it doesn't exist. This is a cop who was mad with power using that power to kill an innocent victim for no reason. He didn't say "sir, if you don't stop threatening, attacking, hurting, etc. me or that woman i will shoot you," he asserted his own power and then took advantage of this. This didn't happen because the victim was a man, it happened because the cop was an asshole who does not deserve to wear a badge or walk free, much less w…
/r/MensRights16/06/11 06:28 PM
4

This isn't so much an issue of men's rights as it is of one really fucked up human being. This is an awful story and probably would have been less likely to occur if the victim was a woman, but that officer is insane and not a good representation of all police officers.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 07:49 AM
1

I have always felt this. It just seems like the most...logical choice. It wouldn't be right to let a man tell a woman she HAS to have a baby, because of how terrible a process that can be for a woman, but he should definitely be able to sign away his parental rights (before a certain time during the pregnancy) if she refuses to abort/put the baby up for adoption. It just makes sense. I've actually seen people go as far to say that, well, if you don't want a baby don't have sex (in the context of…
/r/MensRights16/06/11 06:11 AM
3

I don't really think that makes the female one less upsetting. The guy is clearly having fun with it, and doesn't mind joking around about it, while the way the photograph of the woman is presented, it's pretty much "this is SO disgusting and embarrassing that we won't even show her face."
/r/MensRights24/05/11 01:56 PM
2

You have a great point. In the thread with the actual equivalent female billboard, people are saying "yeah, but they don't show her face". I actually find that one MORE upsetting, because while the guy is, as you said, obviously having fun, they're pretty much saying with the woman this is so embarrassing and disgusting that we won't even show her face.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 01:54 PM
5

I have to do the same sort of thing. I've been on birth control for a few years and had to stop taking it for about a two weeks because of a mailing error with my prescription and my hormones got COMPLETELY screwed up. After i realized what was happening (i haven't really experiences many PMS issues since about the first month i've been on birth control, but had it really bad before that) i pretty much just told all the people who i was almost screaming at for no reason that i needed to be alone…
/r/MensRights06/05/11 12:11 AM
8

She's "hanging out with rapists"? Because of one incident where the sex she had might not have been consensual? Is she just supposed to assume that every guy at that party would rape her? Wouldn't that get her villified just as much, here? When she says "I used to do it a lot, and then I woke up naked next to a guy I didn’t know" she's implying that that result of blacking out was unexpected (whether it was rape or not), meaning that she didn't think they were rapists, or expect them to rape her…
/r/MensRights03/05/11 10:01 PM
1

Yeah, this is what i would hope for. As long as that's the case, i definitely feel that the consequences for a false rape accusation should be higher.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 01:34 AM
3

Seriously. It's not even "woe is me i'm defenseless," just "i'm pissed off so i'm gonna lie and get you in a lot of trouble". This is so awful.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 01:20 AM
2

This is one of the things that complicates this situation more than anything, in my opinion: women should NOT get away with falsely accusing men of rape and they should be punished if it's proven that that's what they did. AND a man falsely accused and punished as a result should not be brushed aside. But it's so hard to decide when punishment would be appropriate for a woman, and i'd be nervous that women who WERE raped but just don't have enough proof would end up in jail because of it.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 01:19 AM
1

That's the only reason i've ever bought one in my life. I'm having a shitty day, so i'll buy it and laugh my ass off.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 05:48 AM
3

In the past, when i've mentioned that I hate cosmo I've actually had guys tell me they LOVE it, because of a blow job or sex tip or something their girlfriend got from it. I guess they never read any of these articles...shit.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:47 PM
2

I don't really know that you can. I feel like people in that situation who don't fight fair are either aware of it and just don't care, or subscribe to the idea that "all is fair in love and war."
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:59 PM
3

I agree with you like crazy. The comment OP is referring to is really awful and disheartening, but in an argument or any sort of fight where anything is on the line, people don't always fight fair. It's just how it is.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 06:06 PM
1

Yeah, yeah, good catch. I did mess it up.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:38 AM
3

I'm absolutely not a feminist at all. My posting history would not say that, because it isn't true. I joined this subreddit because i found a lot of the issues mensrights brings up interesting and poignant; i think men should have the right to not have any part in a child's upbringing (either by providing support or parenting) if they are in a situation such as the one the OP is talking about, i believe that divorce courts (and especially those that award custody rights) in our country are biase…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 01:34 AM
8

It's interesting how you were capable of gleaning that i am a feminist and believe that women are innocent, blameless creature, despite my having said anything that implies that. Honestly, attacking me weakens your entire argument by bringing in your and potentially my personal biases. It's really not necessary, and not good form in a proper argument. And i'm not saying he SHOULDN'T get a DNA test. If he has any doubt at all, by all means, i recommend that he do it. People, and, as a subset of p…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:58 AM
9

I would bet that most men who opt to get a DNA test question the fact that the child is theirs. I'd imagine this would skew the results a bit. With that statistic, you're saying that 1 in 5 to 1 in 3 children born has a father figure who does not know the kid is not his or a father figure (or uninvolved male i guess) who proved he was not related to the child with a DNA test. This is the only way your statistic can be applicable, since you know nothing about this couple or how faithful the girl …
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:22 AM
14

Obviously, but i'm curious as to how he came up with that number without knowing a thing about the couple except that the woman is pregnant and opposed to abortion and adoption and that the guy doesn't want a kid.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 12:16 AM
14

If it's not his (and there's a good 1 in 5 to 1 in 3 chance it isn't) What? How do you figure?
/r/MensRights28/03/11 11:13 PM
7

Sex, unfortunately, isn't necessarily a mutually pleasurable act, and i doubt that many men who consider sex to be the only valuable thing a woman can give would be very concerned with how pleasurable it is for her. When dating is viewed as an adversarial activity, this sort of thing happens. And then it becomes sort of equal, with a woman getting something she wants (support or money or whatever) for something she'd rather not get and vice versa. This isn't to say that women don't enjoy sex and…
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:32 AM
6

It's really not necessarily an attack. A person who's never had a meaningful or successful or satisfying relationship with a member of the opposite sex, especially if they only had very negative ones, would have a very different perspective than a person who has had positive relationships. It's an honest question.
/r/MensRights28/03/11 01:02 AM
0

As things are for women in power positions. It's not like the number of women in government and in the top levels of companies is stagnant. It's just rising slowly.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 08:16 PM
1

That quote really doesn't do anything but answer my initial question. It in no way addresses my argument.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 05:05 PM
2

What percentage of black people in the US live above the poverty line? I don't know the answer to that, but i'm betting it's not "most of them." You can't use outliers to prove that immediate advancement is possible. While there OBVIOUSLY are black people who have risen above oppression, you can't use that as proof that all of them have or will. I won't pretend to know anything about the other things you stated. But i know for a fact that past oppression and discrimination plays a large part in …
/r/MensRights26/03/11 05:36 AM
2

Compared to a blatant minority, yes, 50-50 is only. It makes sense that it would take a lot longer to catch up if you're equally represented than if you are over represented.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 03:07 AM
2

Women are taking an interest in politics. They ALWAYS have. However, they've only recently been able to do something about that. And, since those women who have interest are being raised by women who may have been told "you can be a nurse or a teacher," they're likely to believe the same thing. It comes down to social conditioning and norms, and it takes a while for norms and expectations to be altered or even overturned. That's not to say that there aren't women making a difference and entering…
/r/MensRights26/03/11 12:01 AM
3

Africa is an awfully broad sample. Which parts? Unless you're talking about south Africa, those places consist of an almost completely black population. Of course the process is faster there. It's only fifty-fifty here.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 11:58 PM
4

Something like that isn't immediate--you can't expect voting rights to be given to women and then immediately women become governors, senators, president. Because women couldn't vote, less women took interest in political matters and less women made it into lower political ranks so that there were less women available to enter the higher ranks. It's the very same with corporations--"affirmative action" has "leveled the playing-field," so to speak, or as some people might posit, actually made it …
/r/MensRights25/03/11 10:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter