TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

flavius_aetius451 Archive

View 2 posts and 133 comments by flavius_aetius451 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

This means that anybody who is slightly more intelligent than average will find most school structures boring and limiting. This is the cause for misdiagnosis. Bingo
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:49 PM
2

In older model school environment, such students would have their energy re-directed after they understood the lesson. If they became bored, they would be re-directed to another topic and a good teacher would then integrate the former into the latter lesson. The whole modern system is designed to make kids sit down, shut up, and do what they are told.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:49 PM
1

So now they are resorting to deliberately holding boys back in the name of "equality".
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:40 PM
1

Fine, if they want to. But, the reality is that women are biologically better designed for child-rearing/care than men. Everyone is different, but as a general rule. But, there is no way I would do so, because I still believe that a married man with children has an obligation to provide for them and that if he fails to do so, he will lose the respect of his wife.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:25 PM
1

Different jobs require different skill sets. I could not stay at home all day and stay sane raising the kids. My wife could not handle my high-stress work environment. Both are needed for our family to work.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 04:39 PM
1

you only need a pulse to take care of children Sorry, I disagree. "Watching" children is not the same as "raising" them, the latter of which requires constant involvement in their education, development, discipline, character-building, boundary-setting, rules enforcement, and providing activities that challenge them/spur their development. Yeah, any idiot can stay home with a child. The ability to raise a well-adjusted, respectful, and intelligent child is not for the faint of heart. Also, sit i…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 04:35 PM
1

WTF? Are you kidding me? Different kinds of "difficult."
/r/MensRights12/04/17 04:07 PM
1

Its both. The "shoot a dead body" is a classic "attempt" scenario, so I just referenced it by shorthand.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 11:05 PM
1

No, not non-sense. Basic criminal law 101. You intend to murder someone and he appears to be "sleeping." You shoot him. Turns out he was already dead. You are still guilty of attempted murder. This fact pattern shows up on every criminal law 101 final exam 1st year in law school. Don't believe me..see wiki: An Impossibility defense is a criminal defense occasionally used when a defendant is accused of a criminal attempt that failed only because the crime was factually or legally impossible to co…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 10:55 PM
1

As a trial lawyer, I can tell you that all the evidence in the world and logical reasoning, and persuasive arguments will never overcome someone's personal experiences.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 10:24 PM
1

Its precedent not precedence What you are referring to is convicting someone of attempt to distribute an unlawful substance. No different than shooting a dead body--you will get charged with attempted murder. The elements are you formed the requisite mental intent for the crime and took actions to complete the crime, but the crime was not, in fact, completed, due to either the failure on your part or because of factual impossibility. That has no relevance to a false allegation.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 10:22 PM
1

My body; my choice.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 10:19 PM
3

I don't see what being a "tradcon" has to do with it. There are a lot of men who have traditional value who don't try to impose them on others or "control" others.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 10:18 PM
8

How is it "kinda true." Usually if a wife stays home, she is in control and has responsibility for raising the kids, keeping the house in order, and arranging the social calendar of the family--all of which are as equally important as earning the money to pay for those things.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 10:17 PM
1

And what is the problem with using the sex of the author?
/r/MensRights05/04/17 02:51 PM
1

It is not WRONG. There is no established linguistic rule for use of pronouns when the sex of the subject is unknown. The best practice is for the author to use his or her own sex as the default, as that favours neither.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:39 PM
3

Also, in "fairness", you don't fire a professor for refusing to conform to your ideological litmus test. Welcome to CURRENT YEAR. Yes you do.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:21 PM
1

I always thought the most sensible solution was to use as the default gender the gender of the author.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:16 PM
12

Except for the fact that "the accused students" are all men!
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:58 AM
2

Only a matter of time before sex ed is going to teach its something *ist to not fuck a trans person.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 03:04 PM
1

THANK YOU!
/r/MensRights24/03/17 03:02 PM
5

You are paying for the illusion of being wanted
/r/MensRights24/03/17 02:58 PM
1

YEs...no man would have been able to pull off what she did for as long as she did. Double standard to the extreme
/r/MensRights24/03/17 02:57 PM
9

Reddit loves to downvote for accurate use of language.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 02:57 PM
2

90% of litigation is paid for by insurance companies
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:44 PM
1

You must be one of those "book smart" people. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:26 PM
1

50 years of personal experience, including mentoring young men counts for something
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:16 PM
1

Because if there is gendered equality, then what that would involve is men treating women no differently from how they would treat each other and if they do that No, I just understand rules of proper sentence construction. You stated: Because if there is gendered equality, then what that would involve is men treating women no differently from how they would treat each other and if they do that "women" was the last noun used, hence "they" refers to "women". If you meant what I wrote you should ha…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:16 PM
1

No...I have a time-tested solution. Stand up. Don't take shit from bully's.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:07 PM
1

What are you looking for re: "source"? Some fucking study? I am using 50 years of life experience as my "source", which includes my own experiences in school, plus experiences from my friends, siblings, and from mentoring disadvantaged young male students in after-school community programs.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:06 PM
1

I can't believe you would actively discourage a child from standing up to a bully. What the hell are you teaching him? Other people can;t solve someone's problems. Part of being an adult--dare I say a man?--is being independent and solving your own problems with other individuals. What is he going to do when his co-worker is taking credit for his work, or dumping assignments on him? "Just take it" is not an acceptable response. That causes self-loathing, social anxiety and general lack of self-c…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:54 PM
1

Standing up for yourself gets you ganged up on and the bullying intensifies. False. It means you get some respect and also you become too much trouble. Bully's like easy pickings. I have a solution for individual instances of bullying. I am not trying to solve the "bullying problem" on a societal level , which will never go away. Some people are assholes and take advantage of others. That is part and parcel to the human condition. You can't make people be nice to each other because you formed so…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:45 PM
1

Re: "most bullies." Every school has 1 or 2 well-known bullies who are habitually in trouble either for truancy, misbehavior in the classroom, or fighting/stealing. As to dealing with disciplinary measures, the first step is to appeal the decision to the school board, which will hold a hearing. I will argue they need to assess the credibility of the witnesses. If they are toadies, then they are going to have records as well. My son's records at spot clean, straight A's, honor society, volunteers…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:43 PM
3

But it brings to light the underlying social bias that excuses mistakes by women.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:30 PM
1

Really what are you going to tell your son to do if he is bullied? Running to the administration gets you branded a tattletale/snitch and the bullying intensifies.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:16 PM
1

seriously, what the hell kind of "source" do you want? Personal life experiences do not count anymore? And yes, I think people are going to believe the word of a straight A student over the kid thats already been suspended for bullying 3 times. All I need to prove is my son's story is more credible than the bully's Seriously, WTF is your problem? You want your sons hiding behind their teacher's skirts? Part of growing up is being able to handle your own shit and stand up for yourself. Because bu…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:13 PM
1

Are you insane. "Source??" I lived through high school Witnesses? Who the hell is going to say that nerdy skinny little tommy just randomly and violently attacked lumnbering TJ Kowalski? Thinking far ahead? If he is defending himself and the school wrongfully suspends him, I will sue (I am an attorney). Long term self-esteem and self-confidence are more important than short-term consequences.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:07 PM
1

Most bullies are known quantities. Step 1 is always ignoring. But, if the guy is demanding your lunch money, you say "no." if he starts to hit you, then you need to defend yourself. What, you want me to tell him to go run and cry about it?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:02 PM
1

That makes no sense. Big difference between standing up for oneself and being a bully. Or are you suggesting that the mere act of standing up for oneself or defending oneself makes one a bully?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:57 PM
1

No. No trolling. I agree. Re: movie. I'd rather they didn't. They'd fuck up the costumes and have all of Aetius' troops dressed like Caesars legionaries.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:07 PM
1

How do you solve bullying? Teach your child to stand up to the bully
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:10 PM
1

Do adults just forget? No, but they learned that no bully was ever stopped by a third party or school administration. Bullying is stopped when the person being bullied stands up for himself or herself, which may entail negative consequences (e.g. a suspension for fighting), but restores the self-esteem and self-confidence of the child.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:09 PM
2

It is my hope that the lawsuits pile up against colleges to the point where it hurts. Unless there is proof of intent to violate the law, most of these lawsuits are covered by a standard errors and omissions insurance policy. Colleges may see an increase in premiums, but they are not paying these judgments....what MAY happen is that if a university gets to many of these, their insurance company will drop them and if these suits become too expensive, insurers will create an exclusion for them
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:08 PM
2

Because if there is gendered equality, then what that would involve is men treating women no differently from how they would treat each other Why would you say that. Why wouldn't it be "men treating women no differently that how MEN threat OTHER MEN"? In the new cultural hegemony, the female paradigm is the default.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:03 PM
2

actual consent and legal consent are not the same
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:01 PM
0

Yeah..that would cause some serious internal damage.... You think she went to the ER though?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:58 PM
1

Ding. Fucking. Dong.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:57 PM
1

No man can expect to be treated with dignity if he goes around saying "i feel sad, please help." And this is coming form someone who actually suffers from depression. Admitting you suffer from mental illness is a sign of weakness in my world and I would immediately lose any and all respect from the colleagues.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:19 PM
1

Asking for help. This needn't necessarily be in an emotional way. Men should simply feel comfortable saying: "I'm depressed. Please can you help me." Why?
/r/MensRights16/03/17 01:52 PM
1

Well, I probably will get downvoted to hell, but here is my view: Men experience emotions. However, part of being a mature adult man is to not let your emotions control your decisions or affect your interactions. I highly value stoicism. I very much am oppossed to the notion that being rational, logical, and objective is "oppressive" or "toxic." Experiencing emotions and displaying them. talking about them are very different things. I "express" my emotions through working out, playing music, etc…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 12:03 AM
3

Local case here where coked up woman repeatedly told cops not to drop her off at her home because her boyfriend would kill her because he caught her fucking his buddy.....He had no priors....so, they dropped her off. Aaaaand, he killed her. Not liable because no duty to anticipate and stop future criminal activity. Even if a crime is already in progress, cops have tons of discretion on how to respond.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:50 PM
1

No. He killed someone in defense of his child. GRand jury declined to issue charges.--i.e. justified killing
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:43 PM
6

Its absolutely right. You cannot sue the cops for failing to protect you...even if they know your life is in danger.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:42 PM
0

The man at the very least is guilty of manslaughter. No he isn't. Grand jury said so
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:41 PM
-1

And this is where I fundamentally disagree with about 1/2 of the MRA community. When a man choses to be a father and have a family, he has an obligation to "act like a man" Part and parcel of being a father is "sacrificing for other people." Thats an obligation you, as a man, take on by your decision to have a family. While I generally abhor the "man up" bullshit when it is uttered by feminists, there is a certain minimal standard of behavior men and fathers must adhere to. My problem with most …
/r/MensRights15/03/17 09:45 PM
3

I agree. People wholly ignore that most western women have a complete lack of ability to pairbond. I also find it fascinating the research they did with spiders showing that the offsrping's DNA has characteristics of all males that have impregnated the animal.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:46 PM
0

Yes....but when a man is present, it is his inherent obligation as a father and husband to do so.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:45 PM
2

Thanks. I wasn't aware of any empirical data proving that. I certainly agree it is a major factor.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:21 PM
1

You'd look down on a man for phoning the police while the wife protected the children. Yes. Please don't try and justify that Its called your responsibility/duty as a father to protect your family.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:14 PM
2

No, thats a normal, traditional family structure and relationship. It also accords with the biological fact that men are physically stronger than women for the most part.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:08 PM
2

Divorce rate is not 50%. That was a projection done in the 70s by comparing the total number of marriages to total number of divorces at the time and trending it into the 80s. Actual divorce rate is below 30% if you are dealing with college-educated people with no previous marriages. Hate to cite to a woman's mag, but here: http://www.womenshealthmag.com/sex-and-love/divorce-rate-statistics Here is some more info: The major factors that determine a couple’s risk of divorce include: Cohabitation:…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:02 PM
2

Thank you
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:53 PM
1

People here don't seem to be big on the responsibility aspect of being an adult man--particularly one with a wife and children.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:38 PM
1

do you think a mom should just sit back and watch their kid get assaulted if the dad isn't around to protect them? No, she would do her best using the strength she has. I don't disagree with that. My whole point is that if a father DOESN'T protect his family, then he is not fulfilling his role as a father and man.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:38 PM
1

Yeah, and I would prefer not to work, smoke pot all day and not have to raise kids. But, I chose to get married and have a family. Those decisions involve consequences and responsibilities. Protecting them is one of those.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:36 PM
-1

The roles of mother and father are not interchangeable. {Edit: People here are that fucked that they think you can just swap the roles of mom and dad. Jesus...its like this sub is dedicated to whining about feminism/PCism/SJWs, only because they discriminates against men, rather than the fact the whole thing is fundamentally flawed.}
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:18 PM
2

I disagree. I am in firm agreement with stand your ground laws. If you are faced with threat of deadly force, you have the right to use deadly force in return. If someone intrudes on your property, you have the right to use whatever force is necessary to remove them or eliminate the threat.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:18 PM
1

Fine. She CAN. Most mothers' initial instinct to an intruder is to grab the kids and run and hide until the threat is gone.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:45 PM
0

No. I do the dishes in my household. Dishes have nothing to do with gender differences--like most household chores. Protection has to do with physical strength, aggressiveness, and fortitude.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:29 PM
1

Because real life isn't a genderless utopia. If a woman wants to marry a man who sends her to fight, she is free to do so. I don't know many that would. And, its not a "man in the center of the world." Its a "man is protector of his family." If you are not going to protect your wife and kids, then why did you bother having a family?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:28 PM
4

and all the estrogen in the water supply
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:08 PM
1

If you want to believe that in your personal household that the man is the confronter and the woman is the one to call the cops, so be it. It's not a law. I am not talking about "the law." I am talking about natural rights and moral responsibility.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:05 PM
-1

I have no problem with a parent of any gender defending their children. But when a man and woman ARE together, then, all else being equal, it is primarily the man's job to confront the attacker. The ruling vindicates the guy's rights as a man and father.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:36 PM
-1

Wow. Today I learned that "mens rights" advocates do not favor allowing men to act as men. That they think it is "misogynistic" for a man to feel responsible for protecting his family; and that because "muh, equal rights," they think a father should send his wife to fight off a burglar because "he can be whatever kind of man he wants."
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:34 PM
0

I am talking about being a father with a family. If you decide to become a father and have a family then you are talking on the responsibility of protecting them when push comes to shove. Yes, women can protect as well. But when the burglar comes, I am not sending my wife. That is not "misogynistic" That is being a responsible adult and father. "Equal rights" does not mean ignoring inherent biological and physiological gender differences.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:32 PM
5

Do people not have a right to defend themselves. Have you ever been in a situation where your live is in physical danger and you are fighting off an attacker? Yes, the use of force should be proportionate, but when you or someone else's life is in danger, use of deadly force is justified. There is no legal requirement to use the minimum amount of force necessary and then run away. That is not how people act/react in the real world.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:29 PM
1

You really think a father should send his wife to confront the guy..... You don;t think a father has a natural obligation, as a man, to risk his life to protect his family?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:24 PM
1

I am the protector of my household. My wife certainly looks out for the kids when I am not around. But, when the burglar breaks in at night (which they have)....my wife calls the cops, and I grab the gun.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:22 PM
1

No, not only men are "allowed." But you are a failure as a father if you shirk your duties as a man to protect your children from physical harm and send your wife to fight.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:19 PM
2

Midwest, USA Married/together 1.5-2 hrs per night after work: Bed-time prep, stories, songs, etc. Saturday aftrernoons are "fun with dad" SOn is 3.5...so, doing kids stuff. Teaching him to use legos, build things. I view my job as to protect my children, provide for them, and teach them to because strong, independent people and responsible adults who contribute to society. I think society sees men as bags of money and looks down on men who are involved in their children's lives and who want to t…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:19 PM
-4

But I am being told I am a misogynist for believing it is a man's job to protect his children from physical harm. Apparently, other men here would rather send their wives to try and full the pedo off the kid, because "gender roles are bad, mmmkay"
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:12 PM
1

No, I am getting downvoted to hell for believing that men have a right and responsibility to act as men as protect their families.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:11 PM
2

Whats wrong with you? YOu don't think a father has a natural right to protect his child from rape and that a "man" should send his wife to stop an intruder? Do you have a family? A daughter? Would you NOT do what this man did?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:10 PM
-3

Father's have a responsibility to do so.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:06 PM
6

How is what I said being a "misogynist"? You want me to send my 120 pound wife to fight off the burglar?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:03 PM
2

Finally someone with some sense here.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:03 PM
2

Well, according to some comments below, you are oppressing men by rewarding conformance to gender stereotypes. Apparently, some "men" here would rather send their wives to fight off a child rapist.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:58 PM
-2

Aren't we fighting for the right to act, "as men"? Or has this sub turned into a bunch of whinny manginas that want the "right" to cower in a corner while their daughter is being raped?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:57 PM
-4

It could just as easily be the mother's 'job' to protect their family, or both parents job. When it comes to physical protection, a man is usually in a better position than a woman to do so. And, I am not going to send my wife to fight another man...are you nuts. She could wind up being assaulted or raped. Any man that sends his wife to fight someone assaulting their child is no man at all. {Edit: holy fuck. People here actually think a father should send his wife to protect his child from being…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:55 PM
-5

MRA's do not typically agree with gender roles When they are used to take advantage of men and when the responsibilities inherent in those roles are not balanced by reciprocal obligations, then yes, I disagree with them. But, there are certain things are are quintessentially part of being a man and a father.Feminism tries to destroy these things to further degrade the family unit and make men unnecessary and irrelevant. I don't want a genderless society. I want a society where I can be a man and…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:51 PM
-5

I am not saying a woman "can't" do it; just that it is quintessentially a father's job.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:48 PM
-5

Yes, but in this context, when the father is present, it is his job to stop the assault, not just call the cops. The mother likely won't be physically capable of pulling the pedo off the kid and immobilizing him.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:40 PM
2

You are talking about adults vs children. But, even as an adult, I would have a talking to with someone who hit my child. But, hitting and anally raping are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:39 PM
1

No. Not at all. But I believe in traditional masculinity, especially in the context of a man's duties and responsibilities to his family. My job is to provide for them, keep them safe from other people, and raise my kids to be productive members of society and responsible adults. I am not saying people HAVE to follow traditional gender roles, but in my view, my primary job as a man is to protect my children and if some asshole breaks in my house and assaults them, you are damn right he is gonna …
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:38 PM
6

AGree
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:31 PM
0

I vehemently disagree. I have a daughter. Its my responsibility as a man and her father and right to protect her from pedo men. It is a gender issue because mothers, in general, are not psychically capable of overpowering a sexual predator. Yes, a woman has a right to defend her children. No one is disputing that. But protecting your daughter from other men is one of a father's primary responsibilities.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:25 PM
-10

You and i are not going to agree on this. I am a mens rights traditionalist.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:22 PM
-11

No--being a father. A father's # 1 duty is to protect his family from physical harm {Edit: I was seriously downvoted for this? What the fuck do you think a father's job IS?}
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:20 PM
2

I don't see how this story fits. Because a man has a natural right to defend his daughter. Thats why. That is part of being a parent.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:51 PM
1

"Attempted rape" = "raped me with his eyes"
/r/MensRights13/03/17 03:33 PM
6

Indeed, in any other context constantly insulting an entire gender and repeatedly telling all members of said gender that they are "problematic", "toxic," in inherently flawed and inadequate would be a clear-cut legal case of a hostile work environment.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 03:23 AM
4

Stop oppressing her for wanting to live a balanced lifestyle.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 03:21 AM
1

In other news, water is wet
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:16 AM
2

She really nailed his hand gestures. And he nailed her condescending make smile
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:15 AM
9

To be honest, I found Trump more persuasive as a woman.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:13 AM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:12 AM
1

Booooo
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:11 AM
4

What exactly was he guilty of? He asked for sex, she engaged in intercourse. Seriously...what is Yale saying he should have done?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:00 PM
2

Its literally the salem witch trials all over again. Same hysteria. Repeated again in the 80s with the satantic cult thing and again in the 90s with "repressed memories"
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:59 PM
3

Basically: "If I want to be a slut, I can be a slut" contradicts "women are more than sex objects." The fundamental problem with modern feminism is that by "liberating" women to be sluts, they have devalued themselves such that that is their only value.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:48 PM
1

If you tell someone something enough they will believe it.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:41 PM
2

Not only that, but she falsely assumes that male and female "value" is based on the same attributes. No wonder women bitch so much about "lack of good men." They have devalued their prime asset by giving it away, but their "perceived value" is so much higher that they are "holding out" for "Mr. Right."
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 08:43 PM
1

Womyn are "empowered" because they are "discovering themselves" and gaining "experience" until they meet Mr. Right........
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 07:21 PM
3

The average quality of females is increasing by the modern day definition; education, career success, economic status, and so on And there is where it all goes to shit for her. The average value of a woman is decreasing significantly for men. "by the modern day definition" simply means "in females' headspace." She fails to acknowledge that women have devalued themselves in the sexual marketplace while at the same time elevated their perceived value. Its no wonder they are so prudish, bitchy, and…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 05:52 PM
1

Indeed
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:41 PM
5

Their obsessive work habits, sin­gle-minded dedication, and “intense desire for achievement,” ....so, being a responsible adult who wants to succeed and who is dedicated to their profession.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:20 AM
58

3 year old son loves watching Disney. They have a "you go girl/girl power" song they run during every ad. He turned to me the other day and said, "how come only girls get to be what they want"?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:57 PM
16

No, the real problem here is that when a woman is attracted to a man, she will allow him to get away with behavior that would otherwise be considered offensive, harassment, or even criminal. I do a fair amount of employment litigation work, and that SNL "BE attractive" skit is spot on." The messed up thing is that the legal standard for harassment is whether it is "unwanted." Thus, The same behavior from 2 random guys results in 2 completely different outcomes. The problem is your average guy ne…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 06:56 PM
3

If you go through life thinking you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 06:20 PM
1

I think the point though is that she was not upset by it. I have a major problem with it, as it leads to absurd results like here where someone did not feel violated and yet a person's life is ruined. You have a couple in a consensual relationship both who are happy to continue it and the state inserting itself into the bedroom. Then on the other hand you get insane results like where the couple has sex and then the boy grabs her breast afterward and she reports him for not getting consent.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 05:41 PM
5

Selfishness in fact has been elevated into the primary female virtue, replacing God as the female moral compass. You go gurl!
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:56 PM
2

Again, this notion that a sex act/consent can be broken down into microsecond component parts is ridiculous. She was fine with the end result of the encounter. End of story.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:53 PM
3

"Man up" and pay your privilege tax you cock-man oppressor.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:02 PM
5

The problem is that the frequency and abundance of these articles normalizes the attitudes we are fighting.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 04:01 PM
3

My cuz's ex-wife was like this. Total fraud. Made up an entirely fake profession and background, was able to BS her way about another relative of the same professional; probably contributed to my grandparents going insane/death, and, of course, was fucking every guy in town.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 09:39 PM
2

No, actually its not assault to hit a woman coming at you with a knife. That is self defense and is perfectly legal so long as the amount of violence is proportionate to the threat posed an then ceases when she is no longer a threat.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:52 PM
8

At bar last night listening to two married women talk and laugh about how they make up excuses not to have sex with their husbands because "it takes too much time and effort" and I have better things to do, and they're "so disgusting always wanting sex." I settled my tab and on my way out said "If you dont fuck them, they will find someone else who will."
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:45 PM
1

Its authoritarianism parading as liberation
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:19 PM
2

getting pregnant is not a conscious choice in any case. WTF? You chose to let some rando slather your vag walls in cum drippings. How is that not a choice?
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:18 PM
1

The death penalty "argument" is false equivalency. A person is sentenced to death after a long, expensive arduous process initiated by the state as a result of breaking the most basic elements of the social contract. A baby is innocent.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:16 PM
1

Shit you not...i was accused of raping a woman with my eyes at a bar once.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:12 PM
1

So...what my grandma used to say....why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:40 PM
2

Whats amazing is the number of women who claim "they felt like they couldn't say no because they didn't want to upset the other person." --i.e. they have low self-esteem and problems establishing boundaries. Yet, their failure to verbalize their inner monologue is now grounds for being labelled a sex criminal.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter