TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

flavorfulminx Archive

View 2 posts and 41 comments by flavorfulminx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Well they successfully undermined and co-opted the gay rights movement. Did you know that LGBT used to be GLBT until women undermined the advances of gay rights? Read the short book "The New Gay Liberation: Escaping the Fag End of Feminism"
/r/MensRights27/07/24 10:37 AM
2

Ok, staying faithful to the original ten commandments as a template, this is what I came up with: Thou shalt not psychologically coerce men and boys into gynocentric self-worth. Thou shalt not slander the image of men or masculinity, past or present. Thou shalt not participate in social or legal contracts that are irreciprocal to men. Remember what men have in common which makes them invaluably unique. Honor men's direction and authority as indebtedness for their greater responsibility and liabi…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:30 AM
2

That's no different than saying rape is bad because real victims of false rape accusation won't be believed.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 06:19 AM
1

That's a negative rights violation and is included as "little/no protection from physical violence, sexual assault, or rape by a woman" in the 'Criminal & Civil Courts' section of the negative rights category. I was thinking of adding sub-points because unlike for male-on-female rape, there are generally two kinds of female-on-male rape: violation of man's sexual capacity (non-consensual envelopment) is legal in most countries, and almost never prosecuted where it is illegal. violation of man's …
/r/MensRights28/09/23 08:25 PM
1

If you could, please let me know one or two of the most serious points of disagreement, especially those concerned with the negative rights section because it's the most important.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 08:06 PM
2

I think the reason why people are unaware of most of these points is because both mainstream and most alternative media deliberately avoid mentioning them.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 01:15 AM
2

I think that's covered with the combination of special tax-exemptions for women (equivalent of a man-tax), discriminatory welfare programs, older male retirement age, and several years shorter male lifespan.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 01:14 AM
1

It was a section of a book I remembered from a couple years ago, but it looks like there's no references for that specifically. Just tried searching for studies on sex differences in weaning age but all I could find were studies for India and China. Looks like I haven't done my due diligence on this point. I'll remove it from the list.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 11:21 PM
1

Didn't think of that. Thanks. Although now I'm thinking about all the women's programs in academia and the workplace that are ultimately subsidized by the men working in those same places.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:23 PM
2

That's definitely important, but it's not a negative rights violation. I'm thinking of making a new positive rights subsection called 'parenting.' Do you know some other points I could add?
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:08 PM
3

Those are good points but they're covered with discriminatory grading and discriminatory hiring. There are a lot of contexts in which that discrimination takes place and I'd rather not enumerate all of them.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 04:45 PM
2

I'm of the opinion that if there is no social or legal substance behind societal gratitude, then it's false gratitude meant to manipulate.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:13 PM
3

Do any of you think this (or something more specific) should be added to the positive rights section: Sexual/Reproductive Fulfillment far less availability of sexual affection far less availability of reproduction If this seems like it would be out of place in a positive rights list, just know that feminists (and women in general) have quite often criticized a so-called 'orgasm gap.' Apparently, all of society is to be concerned if women fail to climax every time they have sex, while no one seem…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 09:17 AM
5

I agree, but what's also bad is making one subgroup responsible for the financial externalities of another group. Where does that end? The male body needs more nutrients to maintain the same level of health as the female body; should women be forced to subsidize men's greater spending on food? That would be a reasonable corollary to our current system that forces men to subsidize women's greater consumption of medical services to maintain the same level of health.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 08:06 AM
2

This statement captures both cases: "subsidized insurance rates for women, but not for men."
/r/MensRights21/09/23 07:29 AM
5

Yes, men get into more car crashes and related fatalities even after normalizing against the greater number of miles they drive. But insurance is an economic service provided by companies under fair market price, so those companies do have a right to discriminate in that way; just as night clubs, for example, can commonly discriminate against men. The problem is that this is not a uniform standard. Female health insurance costs more than male health insurance because women use more medical resou…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 06:31 AM
10

The world believes them because women control every narrative regarding gender equality, and have undermined and terraformed the male psyche over generations to accept it.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 04:03 AM
6

I didn't know Greece was still doing that. It's basically a forced surrendering of the right to life, and a violation of the right to liberty and property since it steals your bodily autonomy and your economic/financial opportunities. And yet they don't provide any male-only rights or privileges in exchange, or impose any female-specific obligations or duties. Disgraceful. Greek women should be ashamed of themselves.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 02:05 AM
3

Thanks a lot for the suggestions. I included "women allowed in certain male sports leagues while disallowing the reverse" "women's studies classes/programs but no men's studies" And changed the financial abortion point to "prohibited from legal parental surrender, while women have several means of surrender." I didn't add anything for affirmative action because I already have "discriminatory grading, admission, and scholarship access" "discriminatory hiring and promotion" "special privileges for…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 01:58 AM
2

That's basically their formalization of a prejudicial administration of the law that has always existed, specifically for murder. But that prejudice already applies to every crime: far higher rates of arrest, charges/prosecution, conviction, incarceration, and registration of males for the same crimes; and lower rates for both male and female perpetrators when victims are male. far longer lengths of male incarceration and registration for the same crimes; and shorter lengths for both male and fe…
/r/MensRights18/09/23 02:49 PM
7

Yes, it is victim blaming because the victim doesn't choose what gender their perpetrator is. To imply that they do is to dehumanize the victim by melding their individuality with their perpetrator. That's why I think women being sexually harassed because of their outfit is a bad comparison – they have the power to choose what their outfit is.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 02:34 PM
3

I don't really see at as 'belief' for women, because their concept of truth usually extends only so far as what is personally preferred and socially constructed. That's why individual women, women's organizations, and women's movements have no moral qualms with the means by which they undermine, project, and accuse. In their minds it is justified – they just see themselves as doing the necessary work to construct 'truth.' This is also why they use the term 'my truth' so often, and use words to m…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:47 PM
18

The study that you cited defines a false accusation of rape as "the complainant retracts the allegation and admits to fabrication." It doesn't actually estimate the ratio of instances where a false rape accusation was submitted yet no rape occurred. That ratio is obviously FAR higher than 15%.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:47 AM
18

I came to the conclusion a while ago that women are the primary promulgators of both rape culture and false rape accusation culture. And both of those cultures have almost always existed in only one direction – with female perpetrators and male victims. The entire hysteria over 'rape culture' basically comes down to mass female projection of guilt onto men and boys.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:38 AM
9

We're 'complacent' because even when a man sees through all of the misandric and gynocentric programming, he's still psychologically ruled by learned helplessness – something women are experts at conditioning into boys.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 07:15 AM
3

Wait you just said you've never seen discrimination and then cited the presence of a very common form of discrimination. You're implicitly assuming bias against men to be a lesser form of discrimination than bias against women. That implicit assumption of yours is itself discrimination.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 07:12 AM
1

There's always sex dolls...
/r/MensRights20/05/22 05:49 AM
18

Boycotting and total indifference is definitely the best strategy for men and boys. Just be sure to care for yourself socially. Men need other men that they can trust.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:59 PM
31

Classic victim blaming... saying someone isn't a victim because they were born with certain immutable traits.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 01:56 PM
1

No amount of net benefit could ever justify the sexual torture and mutilation of a baby. So it doesn't matter whether the purported medical benefits are true or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/22 05:41 AM
5

The fact that they all blindly believed in a woman's piteous slander, and are hostile because of it, makes them guilty.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 06:50 PM
2

A major reason why that's the case is because of 2nd wave feminist rhetoric which painted all males as having extreme hyperagency. So it wouldn't matter what's done to any male - he's supposedly invulnerable, even when the most vulnerable part of him is being permanently mutilated as a baby. Feminist rhetoric then claimed that no harm was being done to male infants via circumcision so long as they could still ejaculate later in life (or at least most of them, because more than 100 die every year…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:40 AM
1

You should care about the human rights of male infants rather than ignoring them simply because some males choose to ignore them. There are always some females that choose to ignore women's rights (like women comprising the majority of opposition to the suffragettes); and by your logic, that would make it ok for men to disregard women's pleas for basic human rights.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 04:26 AM
1

But your denial would've stopped it from occurring. You need to take responsibility as a mother and actually protect your own children.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:18 AM
1

89% of single mothers circumcise their male infants. And it's entirely women that mutilate girls in Africa. If you think it's okay for men to unilaterally decide on MGM without regard to human rights, then you should also be content with FGM because it's female driven.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:16 AM
3

Yes, because strapping down an infant female and permanently cutting off her clitoral hood (the homologous structure to the foreskin) is not mutilation as long as there's a predicted hygienic benefit in the future.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:01 AM
3

So was 2nd wave feminism... and the suffragettes for setting up the double standard in the first place of women having the vote but not being drafted.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 11:21 PM
4

It's classic victim blaming - to say that a person deserves to be victimized because of a particular characteristic he has relative to his perpetrator; especially when that characteristic is immutable (like maleness).
/r/MensRights27/02/22 09:11 PM
5

Aside from you being a misandrist, why do you think men and only men should not have the right to life?
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:54 PM
13

Women are willfully blind to their own privilege because they'd rather enforce male disposability than take any responsibility.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:52 PM
12

And a vast number of young men would also. That doesn't make it right to force anyone onto the front lines of war against their will. Especially in a sexist manner.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter