TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

flushwithsanity Archive

View 5 posts and 126 comments by flushwithsanity on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Women ordered to pay child support are less likely to pay (in the US) with their cases rarely escalated to imprisonment or even revocation of other freedoms (DL etc...) it seems they can operate with impunity. But as is often said the mother needs to be a complete mess to lose primary custody anyway so you are likely dealing with the worst of the worst.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 12:11 PM
9

I agree though I feel like when people write "Traditional" they really often mean 2nd wave. I like to think of the 3 periods in Feminism as Traditional, Enlightened & Entitled. Each had their pros and cons with the latest 3rd wave leaning heavy on the cons.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 09:44 AM
12

This has very little to do with men's rights though it is nice to see her getting a reasonable sentence this is one of the reasons we need to fight to show that boys have a voice, that they are not disposable.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 10:19 PM
10

Disregarded would do the trick
/r/MensRights02/06/18 06:24 PM
3

Its in Scotland...
/r/MensRights29/05/18 12:04 PM
6

I agree but The men don't even need to be forced at all to have the tests, the baby gets tested its DNA is held on file and the father can submit a sample for testing if he wishes.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:42 PM
1

I don't think you can "beat" feminism as an idea it will always have its followers much like religion does. What we have to do is present an idea that surpasses its popularity, that becomes the societal norm, a position that is truly equal is very hard to attack without losing some of your own followers and we see that with current feminism as they attack men they lose all we need to do is retain the middle ground of sensible equality the moment we veer to far on one/other side we too will lose …
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:30 AM
8

Yes but its still rare for a man to win his case thats why they made the news when they did.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:38 AM
10

I've said this before but this reminds me of the Theresa Riggi case what with the home schooling and obsessive need to have her child with her at all times to the point of murdering him.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 02:53 PM
1

As well as Romania, Canada, India and to a degree England (applicable under 12 months old and Jury given discretion to drop murder charge to manslaughter) not quite the same in England but similar results.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:38 AM
3

This kind of post is so detrimental to men's rights it just looks like we are all bitter moaning men. It has nothing to do with men's rights and the fact that some people can't wait to bring down other people's happiness is part of the problem here.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:33 PM
17

Killing your own child, if a woman does it it's infanticide and has a much lower sentencing guide than murder. If a man does it it's just murder.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:28 PM
3

I was recently told that multitasking doesn't apply to IT because doing lots of different IT jobs at the same time is the same as just doing one thing. I could not convince her thats not how multitasking works. This was a comment from my sister-in-law...
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:20 PM
1

This reminds me of Theresa Riggi by the way that Adams home-schooled her son to keep him close to her. She was obsessively possessive of him.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 09:32 PM
1

Could it be down to a lack of loyalty? a propensity to turn on the rest of the gang to get off might be a factor?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:55 PM
2

My ex brought up something like this long after we separated. When i did the washing and was hanging it out to dry when it came to underwear i would hang it out just how it came out of the washing, (inside out, back to front upside down, whatever. Id shake it out but wouldn't turn it the right way around while wet) then when it was dry turn it the right way and fold it away. Apparently this was a huge issue that I wasn't "taking housework seriously" something she never mentioned until we were tr…
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:47 PM
2

Its nowhere near that easy in the UK
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:42 PM
1

This is just wrong the man would need to believe her to be incapable of being anything other than a sexual object, not a person at all just an object for his gratification. Any man can look and be attracted to a woman that's natural that doesn't make her an object or him seeing her as only an object.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 11:02 AM
23

We've recently had an issue at our company with someone who has been with us a long time but seems to be picking up all these feminist lies and pushing for change where none is warranted. I can't go into a lot of details but as of the end of last month she was signed off by her Dr for stress stemming from a male colleague (who works in a different department but is at an entry level vs her management level) asking her (and the rest of the project group) for a high-five after a big win. She claim…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 09:51 AM
3

I agree with you the cultural bias its self is an issue and disposability has always been an issue but is getting worse as feminism pushes for their version of equality.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 12:55 PM
2

I agree completely while i do think it speaks to the reality of power dynamics on the whole. finding a partner has nothing to do with mens rights.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:35 AM
4

While I don't really think this is a strict mens rights issue it does speak to a societal power imbalance forcing men to do more for less. I think what OP is getting at really is an attractiveness scale bias I like to think of it like this as a combined Male-Female Attractiveness scale in reality this is a willingness to engage/date scale. Here is how I believe it equates. Male Female 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 1 5 2 6 3 7 4 8 5 9 6 10 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 The offset means Women have far greater choices with less …
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:34 AM
4

I'm also around 60% (63% this year) mine is complicated by me not being in the US and my ex has constantly moved about to try and disrupt my appeals for changes and ultimately attempt to make me give up due to the massive cost while she like your ex is covered by the state. I have my child 2 full months of the year and I have to pay her for those months for the privilege as well as flights and actually taking care of her while shes with me. My daughter is brilliant though video calls me daily ev…
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:16 PM
5

They will make an order for him to buy her a bed /s
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:01 PM
19

At my previous employer the bigger issue I found was expectation to do overtime and be flexible. I'd often be told [Female Colleague] can't stay late because she has children but me having children despite at the time being a single father was completely overlooked. The amount of performance reviews I was seen as being negative because I would occasionally push back on the constant unpaid unpaid overtime. It was just expected that the men would pickup the slack, the amount of time female colleag…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 12:54 PM
6

This is so true I was paying support for 2 years voluntarily I would mark every payment with our child's name. When it finally went through the agency they said i owed back support because it wasn't clear that money was for child support...
/r/MensRights23/04/18 08:37 PM
1

However, I believe should these people succeed, then the SAHM would be considered to be contributing financially to the household and entitled to less alimony due to their percentage of household contributions. After all, after a divorce the man's quality of life is diminished from no longer having these contributions. I think what will actually happen is that the non custodial parent will be forced to pay the custodial parent a wage for all of that time.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 11:07 AM
2

Yes who's going to provide for them to live in safety and comfort with no men around. /s
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:18 AM
2

The video was excellent, really well rounded. It's a shame the trolls came out to play today I hope they haven't put you off completely.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 10:56 PM
2

Well she named his move the claw and is the only person to mention it so it's not sufficient in my eyes but we seem to generally agree, the media lynching took what was bad sexual relations and pushed it as some sort of crime.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:56 PM
1

Some reports name Tripp as the biological father, others say it isn't clear if he is/isn't. So he may be
/r/MensRights14/04/18 01:17 PM
4

When will society wake up and realise that when a good mans ability to serve his country is undermined by false allegations then the system is broken beyond repair.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 01:09 PM
8

I agree with almost everything however this bit: This is not a case of "misreading non verbal cues", "how are men supposed to know" or "just bad sex". This is a borderline sexual predator exploiting a young, defenseless woman I'm not sure this bit can really apply having only really had her side of the interaction, from his brief comments it would seem like any other date until she messaged him to tell him that "although it may have seemed okay, upon further reflection, she felt uncomfortable." …
/r/MensRights14/04/18 12:47 PM
9

We certainly encourage and support (male or female). MRM is about dialogue, about societal change and that includes everyone. It cannot work without support from both genders.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:38 AM
20

how big was that keyhole?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:11 PM
1

This is completely true, my first English teacher in secondary school (UK age around 11) would let us choose our books but we had to write a 2/3 page report on the book once completed and as a result a few years later the "readers" group (high level English class) was almost certainly a 50/50 split. However the teacher of the readers class mandated books and they were all very female oriented and by the time we took our GCSEs only 2 of us were left in the class out of 30. I would argue that the …
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:54 AM
1

They dont allow it, at all in any western country. The only countries that apply some/all of sharia law are: Afghanistan Brunei Indonesia Iraq Iran Mauritania Pakistan Qatar Saudi Arabia Sudan UAE Yemen There are other countries where tribal leaders or small regions will claim to follow Sharia but its not supported at a state level an they are punished for this so I've not listed them.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:33 AM
5

i notice they say that women have bore 86% of the burden of austerity but even if that is true isn't that because women take over 90% of all government assistance? It was also a bit of a dodgy statistic in its self (as most are) in that it assumed pretty much every bit of feminist sponsored research was true and extrapolated it to the population.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:26 PM
2

There are lots of factors to employment and your value though so many factors its hard to calculate everything I mean are the experience levels the same, have they come in from a more prestigious institution, have they been published more in their field etc... The chances are they don't actually do the same job, they hold the same position but in different areas which may well have different issues when it comes to difficulty hiring people. (it may be easier to hire a Music Theory Professor than…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:02 PM
1

The two older women have both been signed off with stress since the meeting you guys can draw your own conclusions on that. The younger ones have dropped it though one of them still believes everything in the media about gender pay they don't believe that its the same in her case.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:50 PM
2

I've done the maths on this before. This video seems to miss out on the main issues that men will be paying more tax and their net remaining post alimony/child support will reduce where women won't see a reduction as they wont be paying tax on it anymore they will end up with more money not less. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7nkkld/changes_to_alimony_and_taxing_everyone_is_worried/ds2u562/?context=0
/r/MensRights08/04/18 03:12 PM
0

hopefully shes learnt from her mistakes.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 02:59 PM
10

I think its people seeing themselves doing worse than their relatively well-off parents that seem to attempt to take the most action. Left leaning may be the more vocal socially but from what we've found they tend to be much more willing to accept the maths when they have raised things, the more conservative women seem to have more of a chip on their shoulder about it and absolutly refuse to back down. We will get numerous letters from solicitors and attempts to go to tribunal from them whereas …
/r/MensRights08/04/18 02:16 PM
37

We've had our fair share of people like this and in reality they are just self serving thinking they can get something out of it. We spent about 2 years back and forth with one former employee who was a part-time researcher who felt that she should earn the same as the solicitor she was researching for. She wasn't able to bring a case to tribunal thankfully. From purely anecdotal experience its not the people you would expect that would bring this up either, its the women who have come from a re…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:48 AM
13

Her superiors would be me and my wife (owners) its far more difficult to get rid of her than you would think (in the UK) outside of her raising this her work is good and shes been with the company since we started so its not as easy as all that. The thing is the women in question have no issue, they do understand that they are pay is prorated and there are other full time women in the same role that earn the same as the men. From our experience the more accomplished women in the company don't be…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:41 AM
158

The amount of HR people who think this despite seeing the salaries is also baffling our HR assistant has been continually raising issues that two of the women we employ don't earn the same as the men in the same roles the problem is they only work 3 days a week the men are all full-time and their hourly rates are exactly the same but she just doesn't seem to think that's relevant.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:23 AM
3

What are you quoting? where are your links to the source of this?
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:02 PM
5

I haven't read the article yet but I have archived it because of intrusive ads. http://archive.is/NgGm7 Having now read the article this isn't a gendered issue just an employer being shitty.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:58 PM
2

It was Judge Mark Everall who calculated her expenses at the £1441 amount last year, not the original order, the original order was correct and agreed at £1100. Judge Everall saw no need to increase the husbands burden shortfall but didn't explain that the wife needed to stump up the difference herself. I agree with you alimony for life makes no sense and I did need to re-read that twice but it was definitly that the £1441 was only in reference to the calculation of costs made by the judge last …
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:41 PM
2

A lot of these things their companies force attendance. Plus the whole self respect thing already said.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:26 PM
4

This has been posted a dozen times already however you can't compare them. The facts are she took the deal, he took it to trial, refused to cooperate, tried to cover up right until he got into court where his argument was "yes it was a ponzi scheme but the government closed me down so early nobody really lost out" His own lawyer said he'd never seen a defendant do so much harm to his own case, he was arrogant and made it impossible to get anything other than what he got. The real issue here is t…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 09:21 AM
8

This is literally a nightmare and aside from the tragic personal loss is the fact that had the roles been reversed CFS would have removed the daughter from her fathers care immediately.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:48 AM
1

This has nothing to do with mens rights I think you are in the wrong sub if this is the kind of thing you are looking for.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:41 AM
9

While obviously what she did was terrible its hard to compare the cases because she took the deal, he pushed it to trial, refused to cooperate and by a few accounts was obstructionist to the point of contempt then basically admited to running a ponzi scheme but defended it by saying that at the point of discovery nobody was out any money. She most definitly shouldnt have been offered the sweet deal that she was but I think thats a general issue with high level white collar crimes getting a pass.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:26 AM
1

yep you're right
/r/MensRights18/03/18 07:22 PM
31

Women Only is at 10:15 to 11:00 on Tuesday and 09:00 to 10:00 on a Sunday. Men only is 19:00 to 20:00 on a Friday its on the full schedule.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 08:13 AM
3

Trying to make men's rights a left-right political issue does nothing to further our cause and this has been reported and re-reported on all the major news networks for years, it rears its head anytime there is any political movement involving either of the Clintons. You're looking to score political brownie points to the determent of actual current mens issues.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 09:05 PM
3

Sadly this isn't even anything new 20 years ago when I was at school my grades suddenly declined in a number of subjects all of which were taught by new female teachers I went from predicted grades of A's in all 3 to C's my coursework was always marked as C or D in them however the exams (independently marked) which made up 50-75% of the overall mark I was consistently getting A's. For years I thought I was bad at coursework and if it wasn't for my grandparents pushing me I could have easily end…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:08 AM
2

This is just a difficult way to go about this just make the assumption that once a week every man is going to do something to annoy at least one woman and take an extra "man tax" out of his salary to cover these inevitable fines. /s
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:51 AM
4

Thats because this is from the UK and there isn't a claim culture there like in the US and he would only be able to sue for actual quantifiable damages so (medical bills though a non-issue in the UK etc...) there is no punitive damages.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:09 PM
7

London is the most diverse religiously so there is no surprise there but all regions were against MGM with 62% in favour of a ban.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:40 PM
6

Per mile women have more accidents but men drive a lot more miles and drive as a vocation a lot more often so the cost of accidents by men per year is more but they've done many more miles than women so the cost of accidents per mile is lower. I've posted this before the only source I have is a good friend who works in the insurance industry but It would make sense when looking at total crash costs vs average miles driven as a rough estimate so I think its true.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:19 AM
5

This is very true, when you had to hand wash all the clothes, pluck the chicken before cooking it and beat and sweet the rugs by hand that was a different story but modern homemaking is far less work than it once was.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:20 AM
5

Everyone has the main issues covered but as one extra point. Make sure you define the scope of your work that you are looking at inequality for men in X country. Far too often these kind of things get marginalised and marked down because teachers draw comparisons with how women are treated in Saudi Arabia etc... Its a false equivalency but don't give them the opportunity.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:16 AM
3

That would depend entirely on the nature of the issue.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:39 PM
4

Yes this would help to keep the quality high and ensure we don't descend into a circlejerk.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:22 PM
1

I did the same on Saturday however the response I got was two immediate chat disconnections as soon as id sent through the product information. Glad you managed to get a response.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:59 AM
3

the only issue I have with the nudity is that some of the male nudity scenes are completely unnecessary at one point a guy walks into a room, completely nude and talks to the group of people in the room while eventually putting a robe on, but there was no reason, no context to his nudity he just had no clothes on all the other scenes had a purpose and the same with the brief female it was an advert for different sleave models, it made sense Also unless a woman is spreading you can never see much…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:53 PM
5

Yes we did have a couple of women saying things along the lines of "but we contribute to the overall performance in ways other than performance to target" but nobody gave any specifics and my wife basically told them do what we bonus you on, thats what we pay you to do
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:28 AM
2

If mental health was the only factor in all of this the reason for the disparity between the genders is women are given help to work through their mental issues, men are told to "man up" and left to deal with an ever deepening pit of worthlessness as society shuns them.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:57 PM
3

Do you think the push to make everything more lightweight (for good reason) has had a negative impact on the throwing of grenades, have they reduced in weight and made them too light to easily throw over distance. Its been 20+ years since my time in the forces (UK) so i am completely out of touch and just curious if that could be a factor though I suspect our efforts to make life easier have made us less capable really.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:31 PM
23

My company recently did the whole gender pay-gap UK government calculations and for us we had no gap at all for pay but a large (30+%) pay-gap for bonuses. Now we know the calculations are all BS anyway but there is zero discretionary elements to our bonuses, we have a single scheme based entirely on performance against fixed targets that are identical for everyone that can earn bonus. A few people in the office thought this was confirmation of bias but its simply that the men in the office on a…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:27 PM
2

or men don't come forward claiming sexual trauma, or women come forward where there was none.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 09:16 PM
12

Someone once said "After a lifetime on a pedestal, equality feels like oppression" I thank this applies well to this person and feminists in general.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:58 AM
7

setting aside the serious allegations of Serious Sexual Harassment Sexual Assault, Rape etc... and just touching on the lower end sexual harassment/comments etc... how can we as a society hold people to today's standards for comments made 15-30 years ago, its senseless, people have grown, society has changed and so have a lot of opinions.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:16 PM
2

It was a student in her class according to several news outlets and she taught grades 7-9 so I think thats 12-14 year olds in Canada (not 100% sure).
/r/MensRights10/02/18 11:29 AM
8

Yes and the reason the warehouse pays more is that. Its a less comfortable role and Tesco finds it harder to fill. Tesco pays their cashiers a flat wage but the warehouse is speed and performance based so the warehouse can earn more but they have to work their asses off to do it. As you said this is just comparing one job to another completely different job they seem to want a world where a jobs value to society determines its pay rather than the work involved to actually do the job.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:43 AM
4

Most gird girls will tell you that the F1 calendar makes up 30-60% of their earnings depending if they have single/multi race attendance and if they are team affiliated. They are involved in a lot more than is televised and they can make a good living off the back if it as the exposure and brand association can often lead to them getting work for motor-shows or brand advertisements etc...
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:06 AM
7

It's a problem with society as a whole, large companies are going to target the loudest audience, and one of the most vocal in society are feminists the thing with feminism and women's inward group bias means that a small group of loud feminists can shame most women into towing the line, men's outward group bias (to protect women) mean a majority of men will also be bullied into towing the feminist line because it's in our DNA. Until we fix society companies will make money from pandering to fem…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:00 AM
3

Yes in most of the US this is the case and in a lot of other western countries too.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:51 AM
5

I can see it also luring men into a false sense of security. It doesn't seem to matter if consent was withdrawn a minute after it was given or 20 years later it's retroactively withdrawn no matter what men will be punished for women wanting the reward in life without the responsibility
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:09 PM
130

This doesn't work, there is nothing to say that consent wasn't withdrawn 2 seconds after it was given on the app.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 02:27 PM
1

The problem is who's to say that 1 second after the recording stops someone doesn't have a change of heart and decide they withdraw consent.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:21 PM
1

As long as men are free to do the same with no greater blame or societal disdain then who cares. We are all free to choose to have as many or few sexual encounters as we are comfortable with. There is nothing wrong with objectification, it's a natural phenomenon, feminisms current puritan and hypocritical position is the only thing that makes articles like this so contentious.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:22 PM
12

This is the equivalent of saying: I should be allowed to be a neurosurgeon without taking the appropriate tests or training because if I had to take those tests or training I would fail because I don't want to put the effort in to get in a position where I could pass them.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:26 PM
2

For me I'd say this is more of a societal problem as a whole than a Google problem and any alternative services you pick will likely have the same issues just on a differing scale. I think all we can really do is try to ensure that issues like this draw interest and are considered newsworthy enough to counter the 3rd wave feminist media bombardment.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:12 PM
2

This is the kind of policy that while it makes some sense you are either punishing children for their parents poor decision of having more than the allowed children or encouraging women who have more than 2 children to cry rape in order to get support for that 3rd child.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:11 PM
2

This year a friend of mine has been asked to take a pay cut as a way of levelling the salaries in their department (there are only 4 people including him). It wasn't a massive amount for him so he agreed. 3 of the people in the department (including him) are full time. The other (the only woman in the department) is part time, working 3.5 days a week. This week hes found out that the levelling means that all 4 of them earn the same monthly salary but she only needs to do 70% of the hours to do t…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 07:07 PM
37

I know this is just a rebuttal to all the recent BS but in reality the US wasn't the first. France: 1946 Germany: 1949 EU/EEC: 1957 (though not a country all members were subject to the principals of equal pay)
/r/MensRights05/01/18 12:51 PM
16

Don't wait to get a lawyer, file with the court immediately that shes breached the custody order. Her having primary custody is part of that order, she doesn't get to make decisions against the court order but its for the family courts to deal with, take her back to court with all the evidence you can to show that shes breached the court order by withholding visitation on your court mandated days. If you don't take it to court first shes going to find some BS reason to go back to the court to tr…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 11:31 AM
6

Just to back this up the reporting on this has been relatively widespread in the UK the problem is it doesn't carry the same momentum as the #metoo movement because they are pumping out new accusations every few hours. Some articles from the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-42374431/what-is-it-like-being-falsely-accused-of-rape http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-42369645/rape-prosecutor-it-s-just-sheer-incompetence http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42417553 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42431171 http:…
/r/MensRights03/01/18 11:22 AM
7

The other big problem here is that it also effects child support payments because now the Gross pay of the person paying child support is considered higher (and this is often how they are calculated). So not only does it mean higher tax payments on the total amount of money but also increased child support payments. You can near guarantee that nothing will be done to change the child support calculations or reduce Alimony payments to reflect a reduction in Net income as a result of this. OLD SYS…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 01:44 PM
2

I reported a few other tweets of hers that weren't deleted and got the same response, now her account seems to be private...
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:53 PM
17

Twice as many pet support payments.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 12:04 AM
27

The pre-marriage and post-marriage were like two different people, there were some warning signs but they were minor, as soon as we were married it's like a switch flipped. Initial I put this down to the stress of trying for a baby then being pregnant. In reality men are conditioned and to a degree genetically predisposed to defend women even to their detriment and she played on this to get what she wanted while I was busy looking to rationalize her behaviour. TLDR: Boobs are the real WMDs
/r/MensRights27/12/17 12:02 AM
61

So I wonder how much the support payment will be for the maintenance of the pet? My ex wife took our dog when we split (no say in the matter she just up and left with everything we owned, the money from the bank, our child and the dog, I'm still fighting 4 years later to see our child) she found her new man was apparently allergic and gave her away (our dog) rather than let me have her. She used to ride in the car with me to work a couple of times a week, I was the only one who walked her so I'm…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 10:12 PM
2

I think your confusing all the kids and partners, he has 2 adult children with Elka Brand (one of hers he adopted and one of his own). The woman suing here is is ex wife Samantha Marie Olit (first wife as he never married Elka) he only has one child with her who is 15. The other 3 are with his widowed wife. You're points are absolutely right shes just trying to grab some of the estate for herself things she wasn't entitled to through divorce decree, her son with Chester is already going to recei…
/r/MensRights23/12/17 11:39 PM
4

Simply getting behind should never be a felony charge. Leaving aside the whole right to give up parental responsibility debate, which I would solve this, I think there should be some form of charge for evading child support for people who purposely refuse to work, take cash jobs etc... But your average non-custodial parent who does what they can shouldnt be screwed at every turn it doesn't help the child at all it just locks someone up so they can't earn the money to clear their deficit and they…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 03:20 PM
11

The problem with this is removing a single detective doesn't address the root cause of the issue that listen and believe should have no place in our justice system. Everything must be verified. Just because the good people of this world would never make up a rape allegation and can't conceive of someone doing so doesn't mean that it doesn't happen (seemingly often) and doesn't mean a mans conviction should be based on nothing corroborated. The rush to boost conviction rates is to the detriment o…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 09:27 AM
7

The difference with this one is that it wasn't so much a police bungle as it was the woman deliberately deleted messages to make the conversation she disclosed fit her version of events. Although why they would believe that what she was presenting was true alone I don't know, you would think they would have gone to Facebook and had confirmation of the full conversation at source.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 09:23 AM
1

The archived version: http://archive.is/jMmjF
/r/MensRights22/12/17 09:18 AM
1

Yes it would certainly seem so. This is where the #metoo movement starts to fall apart.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 09:48 PM
15

I suspect at 39% they are including technically homeless which is mostly women in shelters or temporary accommodation I'd be surprised if the "street homeless" figure was less than 90% men.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:02 PM
23

I'm surprised how high the amount of females is under Homeless People, we really need to do something about that.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:44 AM
3

this seems to be posted every other day but while its great that shes being charged there are things here to consider. The 32 years is if she was given the maximum on all counts against her AND importantly ordered to serve them consecutively. This isn't going to happen even if found guilty on all charges i think the maximum of any single charge is 5 years so that's the realistic maximum she can get. She isn't going to get the maximum on all charges
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:08 AM
1

"Bin Lorry Worker"; Has anyone ever seen a female "Bin Lorry Worker"?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:12 PM
1

It makes sense, if you've ever watched any modern TV show men are always useless so it must be accurate /s
/r/MensRights16/12/17 07:59 PM
8

You have to realise that we are talking about a gap at entry level, low end, lower skill jobs causing this disparity. Women in general want a clean, safe, comfortable working environment and at the low end of the job market that is poorly paid. Men are more willing to do hard labour, working in dangerous, uncomfortable environments which due to those factors are better paid. If a man takes a safe, clean job next to a woman there is no difference between their pay, similarly women more could choo…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:10 PM
10

Did you even read the article? though their headline is sensational she didnt admit anything she reaffirmed that he signed the yearbook and that she dated it at the time of his signing.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 09:03 AM
11

Yes posted this before but mens stats include hundreds of thousands of professional drivers covering on their own 100x the average mileage of women drivers. Men have more accidents per year Men drive more miles per year Men have less accidents per mile If someone on here works in the insurance industry they will be familiar with this, they have the stats but removing professional drivers from the equation significantly benefits every-day male drivers which is why its not done, money is money.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:54 AM
2

If this was the kind of punishment used against fathers who got behind on their child support I could be more accepting of this. This isn't a mens rights issue but it does highlight how the application so of the law fails fathers while showing empathy and compassion in cases like this a father would be sent to jail, lose his job, have a felony conviction for getting behind and continue to get further behind while locked up and unable to pay.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:09 AM
1

My wife still has the pregnancy test from our second child in a baby memento book, that's over 2 years old and still looks positive. Maybe its brand specific?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:04 PM
2

It's lucky us men don't have feelings or this could really bring them out. Brilliant
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:26 PM
3

I don't think she ever forced him to wear a dress but they certainly had a weird relationship: source
/r/MensRights02/12/17 11:23 AM
20

Its also frustrating when people try to equate current wave feminism with liberal, leftists when its not tied to any wing. Feminism is the business of putting women ahead and there are selfish individuals and groups on all sides of politics that advocate and more importantly make money from pushing that agenda. Some of the most vocal feminists I've known are Tory (Right, UK) voters but its business to them, they make their money espousing falsehoods and spreading hate and the Tory party policies…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:52 PM
11

My daughter is 4 years old and I'm still fighting to get on her birth certificate her mother objects, moves constantly and throws as many accusations as she can to slow things down. I know this throws up a load of privacy issues but part of me wishes that DNA was able to be taken from children so fathers could be confirmed without mothers involvement even if its just to add fathers to birth certificates if nothing else.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:27 AM
1

You have to consider as well that men have far less disposable income after child support and spousal support they can often be left barely able to make rent so paying for healthcare ontop (even if it were properly provisioned for men's health) wouldn't be possible.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 07:58 AM
2

The video is 3 years old i guess the site could have basically gone down between then and now but yes this is annoying.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:29 AM
13

I think the reality is the industry is broken and nobody cares enough to fix it. From how its been explained to me (by someone working for a large insurance company) The vast majority of professional drivers, Truck, Delivery, Taxi etc... are male, they rack up a disproportionate amount of miles and per year they account for quite a few accidents (but not necessarily per mile). When insurance premiums are calculated they take into consideration overall cost of accidents etc... even if you are not…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 01:13 PM
29

I have the same issue my fiance and I do the exact same job (partners in our own firm). I'm a year older with full no claims, never been involved in an accident, shes had 2 accidents in 3 years (at fault) and her as the primary driver would be cheaper than me. Sadly I drive a lot more often so we're stuck paying the extra £160 a year.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 12:11 PM
2

Yes you are right
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:23 PM
1

Oh thats my fault for not looking at the detail I thought it was a GBH case for some reason.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:22 PM
3

The second link seems pretty close both were convicted for the exact same offence
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:04 PM
1

She was convicted of GBH because his injuries were serious and a catagory 3 (lowest level GBH offence the starting point for sentencing is 4 years with 3 years where there were serious mitigations and 5 with serious aggravating factors. This makes no sense at all. Forgetting the gender issue here the punishment doesnt fit the conviction.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 05:58 PM
1

It is shocking but Men die early, work dangerous jobs etc... And i really wonder if this is counted like this because women often dont put the fathers name on the birth certificate and a lot of men just dont have the money to fight them on this.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:52 PM
5

Its not even just the cost of divorce if you take that out of the equation completely the mother automatically has full custodial rights while the father by default has none at all unless she agrees to them and everything can be a battle a man wanting to support their child is hit both ways as accepting that you need to pay support doesnt legally give you any rights to your child so you can pay support and still need to fight to get your name on the birth certificate and time with them etc.... I…
/r/MensRights19/01/17 09:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter