TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

flyingfox12 Archive

View 0 posts and 40 comments by flyingfox12 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lead Author: https://people.csail.mit.edu/klbouman/pw/papers_and_presentations/cvpr2016_bouman.pdf ​ That's a fundamental piece of "HOW" it happened. ​ Here is a link to the "data set" produced by a computer, you'll see 500,000+ lines. five with 5 zero's. https://github.com/achael/eht-imaging/commit/886b07b8a00d142b23a70537511c79bef85e0042 But maybe you're just so good a programing yourself (Obviously you have a background in it) and you can do that much code without a commit. Most people can't …
/r/MensRights13/04/19 10:31 PM
6

That's a terrible source for how much work because git doesn't differentiate between uploading data sets and writing original code. So a data set of 100,000 lines is produced by computers and then uploaded by a human, whereas a 200 line code that's the core function and is essentially the heart of the breakthrough is only a fraction of a percent in that link.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 06:07 PM
1

This woman tried that and got life without parole.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 05:53 PM
88

dropped against mom but convicted against dad. I wonder if the confession by the father did anything to help getting a conviction where for the mother they didn't get a conviction. Charges dropped means they DA didn't see enough evidence for the charges to get a conviction. The step-father of Charlie Dunn, who drowned at Bosworth Water Park, has admitted being responsible for his death.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:59 PM
0

700 subscribers. This women is trying to get famous by saying terrible things. Posting about her is exactly what she wants.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:49 PM
1

Marriage is a contract. Like a bad business partner, sometimes you do all the work, make all the contacts and earn all the money but that original contract makes your partner entitled to half. This guy learned the hard way he should have had the difficult conversation before marriage where he got in writing that his company was not part of their assets if they divorced. This is less about a lack of rights and more about understanding the law sees marriage as a 50 50 business partnership when the…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 11:49 PM
2

You may find many of the professors really dislike the SJW tone as well. Prof's are just people.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:42 PM
–

But it's still all bullshit. You're not convincing. You take this extreme postition. Call peoples arguments "the same" because "big words" Then you slander me personally because I wouldn't go and act as a librarian for you. "It was certainly a damn sight more effort than you put into anything." You come off as rambling crazy person. Not once did you actual attack your own position. That's important because when people read your rant they see those flaws and you don't bother addressing them. Ad h…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 11:33 PM
–

So no, we base feminism/feminists on the majority of feminists. You're not a leader, don't speak like one
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:51 PM
–

Reading the excerpts you use and your interpretations of those excerpts is a little difficult. I find you stretch as much as some feminist you're criticizing. In any case my point remains Laci does not speak for feminism, she is I fact a polarizing figure and shouldn't be the benchmark a men's rights movement uses to address feminism and the claims they have and also the claims the feel are contentious within their disciplines.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:44 PM
–

The website is easy enough to read that Feminism as a topic is a root branch. So when I said they are all informed it's because that's how the site works. Its a summarization of the most topical work in almost any scholarly branch of philosophy, with concise information and citations. So it doesn't make sense to send you an article as the site is a summation of many articles. But if you want a specific link to something I was saying, then all you need do is back up what you are saying as I'm say…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:00 PM
–

No. Only the most prominent ones. Also, even the "good" feminists are, at the very least, grossly misinformed. And, given the accessibility of information, that is hard to excuse as mere ignorance. No. Only the most prominent ones. Also, even the "good" feminists are, at the very least, grossly misinformed. And, given the accessibility of information, that is hard to excuse as mere ignorance. Back up the claims made here and I will gladly.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 09:05 PM
–

Here is an excerpt that sounds like a pretty reasonable thing to say, from a feminist, under the analytical feminist branch The kinds of male-biased claims just mentioned have negative consequences not only for women, but also for philosophy. Feminist philosophers argue that on many levels—from individual concepts such as reason or autonomy to entire fields such as philosophy of mind—philosophy has been distorted or limited by the absence of feminist influence. The remedy for these distortions a…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 09:03 PM
-6

They are the summaries of scholarly articles. All are informed opinions.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 08:18 PM
–

Feminism in philosophy has very smart voices that do not sound like anything that the news throws at you. They craft strong logical essays making clear points about their own flaws. You can go to Plato.stanford.edu and see summarized versions of the arguments from well written pieces. I don't agree with everything but since they write as an intellectual pursuit they are well informed. Labelling them misinformed, as you have, is really missing the point of having a discussion.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:21 PM
16

The problem with feminists is we watch the worst representations of their movement. Which has also broken the movement down to a bullshit spewing contest. Laci is not a feminist, she's lost credibility and only appeals to the large echo chamber. Good on someone to debate her and expose her faults, as she's got some namesake. But lets be honest. Men's rights is about gender equality. Letting Laci be a rep for any meaningful discussion hurts everyone's cause except her echo chamber.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 06:37 PM
6

The anonymity of Reddit makes it a powerful tool for gaining insight into a culturally shamed event. It allows large groups to gain insight into what is a wrong/shameful/illegal act; this is what confession bear is all about. The upvotes are not people supporting the idea but instead people helping give exposure to something noteworthy, as crime and immoral acts usually are. Your comments sound to me like censorship.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:12 PM
1

He was on the job so it may be the case that workers compensation would pay the bills. At least that is what would happen in Canada.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 04:10 AM
3

Screen time is so favourable in one direction that it would be an easy case to argue against discrimination.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 07:39 AM
2

Consent is given by the guardian(s). Don't get me wrong I think it's really a shit thing done but I don't agree that your language does anymore than misinform on the situation. The issue is that people will always focus on your categorization of the issue which is easy to argue because it's inaccurate and misleading to many people.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:55 AM
11

This will obviously fail. It's just a marketing message. As a policy it doesn't hold water as it is not reflective of reality. This is just not an industry that can handle that type of demographic.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:46 AM
1

This is about collecting money. It's known women Cancer organizations get the more donations than other organizations. So they are trying to get a female focused slogan to get some of that female cancer money. Gender targeted marketing is a very common thing and has more to do with money then rights.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 02:39 PM
3

She's a real judge. The decisions are legally binding.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 10:32 PM
2

That's really alarming. Definitely needs to be changed. Thanks for all the information. The system of laws needs to restructured. However I really think the Children should always be the focus. If a women wants to bring a baby into this world but can't take care of it, she should understand by default she is not the primary caregiver, and that if the man is in a better spot to take care of the child, e.g. has more savings to properly care for the child in the first year, and/or has a better payi…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:29 PM
1

you miss the how. if a man could do something to his own body to abort then he should be free to. however him tying down a women and performing an abortion is assault, even if you add extra steps. pro choice is not about having a baby its about manipulating ones own body.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:07 PM
2

those edge cases need a judge. they are a great example of where the law needs to be updated. if a women deceived a man in order to use his sperm he should not need to care for the child, thats a burden that is excessive. I would also charge the women for some form of assualt
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:04 PM
1

Women do get an 'out' (abortion) when they've made a bad decision, so why aren't men allowed an 'out'? because they can't do anything apart from assault to manipulate another persons body.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:00 PM
0

this sub doesn't like to be reminded of that choice. Its such a critical part of the debate. Hopefully male contraceptive will be available and super effective so a mans choice can be made without a hard dick.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 10:56 PM
2

So cringe worthy
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:41 AM
1

I read it as Quote model quote. The story is not at all defensive of her. They do point out that she was considered a normal person before this. So I assume that's another reason for the title. Kinda like, it could happen to anyone you know, even this 'Model' mom is sexually assaulting a boy.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 12:59 AM
-5

Where is the video of consent? I don't trust the Dubai legal system for rape charges, not in the least. This story, if we assume a woman got raped, which does happen. Is a window into what can happen in that jurisdiction. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-23381448
/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:17 PM
6

To me it's a manipulation of the reader as it's there to force a conclusion that is unknowable.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 02:47 AM
3

Your title says "Consequences for her? None." I can't find that in the article can you show a quote or did you just make a false claim?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:32 AM
1

Fuck you I'm explaining the system not saying it's perfect. Your the one who doesn't get it and then gets mad at the messenger.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 03:38 PM
1

So the fact he actually had a lawyer later you never discussed. Please clarify your point. He obviously used a lawyer after so its possible. You paint a picture to support your theory so I'll do the same. He had 4K under his mattress but he was saving for a truck he could have just used that money
/r/MensRights26/10/16 03:37 PM
0

Wow mad much. You are really not very stable.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 03:35 PM
-4

The issue wasn't the evidence was not good it's that he didn't know how to use the evidence. That's not a gender issue. He's a victim of his own incompetence. He's then a victim of the system because when he didn't go back with a lawyer he couldn't get the case re-opened because there were no grounds to reopen the case. You're right this sub has a long way to go. However, after reading the article. The ex was a bitch but it's not that his gender limited him. He was limited by his poor planning i…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 07:17 AM
9

I assume someone who has enough to pay $730 a month to someone else can get a loan and or discuss payment options with a lawyer. Payment options with a lawyer are very common.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:30 AM
13

$730 a month for 7 more years or a couple grand in lawyer fees. He made the wrong choice.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:35 AM
2

They both sound vile. She'll use the fact he was abusing her as a defence, which it sounds like there is evidence for. However, with her outright lying while he was dying and denying people, such as his brother from helping, her ability not to appear a helpless victim is compromised. She'll probably end up with 15years, off in 10 for good behaviour if she can. Manslaughter with another charge because she clearly prevented people who may have saved him from doing so.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter