TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

flynny1026 Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by flynny1026 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

From UK, and I can confirm that people think you're crazy the second the words men's rights get mentioned. People just refuse to listen, because they assume feminism is 100% correct, even though most wouldn't call themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 04:59 PM
1

Of course, is never give CPR to someone who was unconscious, that'd kill them. I'd give it to a very recently dead person.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 04:57 PM
7

It's rating attractiveness, not any other factors
/r/MensRights09/10/19 06:03 PM
24

Men are more likely to inflict injury, but abuse less on average, whereas women are more likely to be abusive but less likely to cause notable physical injury.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 09:19 AM
1

Doesn't make the claim false, it makes the claim a claim instead of a fact. But yes, he should be presumed innocent.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 08:44 PM
-4

So social and not legal then?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 03:09 PM
2

This isn't her denying the event, it's saying she isn't a mystery person from the sound of the article. Just as it's wrong to instantly say they're guilty, it's wrong to announce the claim fake, it's for the courts to decide is the pm ever groped anyone - not us.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 03:08 PM
11

Ok, what have the 'real' feminists done for us? Or is there literally no discrimination against men?
/r/MensRights26/09/19 10:48 AM
7

"organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests" - Mariam Webster. You're picking and choosing what fits the agenda. And take your own advice. Actions speak louder than words and feminism has never acted for men.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 10:33 AM
6

I'm saying it's the same one, after you said it's multiple definitions. That's called a counter argument, care to respond to it? Google it now and you'll see: "the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes". That's a different definition, the other wasn't. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 10:28 AM
10

The first one is the second sheet shortened. They miss off the end on purpose to look better
/r/MensRights26/09/19 10:20 AM
12

Feminism - 'the movement for equality of the genders on the grounds of rights for women" You missed the end there bud.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 10:11 AM
8

Because people actually help women.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:34 AM
5

Enabling is not sexually harassing, we don't make definitions up, that's for feminism to do.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:57 AM
6

Tell them they missed the end of the definition of feminism. "Equal rights by the advocacy for women's rights". The first two words don't tell the full story and they aren't the sole definition.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:53 AM
5

You missed the end of the definition. It's for equality via advocation of women's rights
/r/MensRights10/09/19 07:15 AM
1

When they're posing a threat to you it's a bad idea to turn around in any situation, and where could he have of even run to? There were crowds of people around who all were supporting her.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 12:10 AM
19

It shouldn't be equal, it should however be afforded to both men and women at the same rate in which the problem is affecting them and catering for them in that regard.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 06:18 PM
26

This advice needs to be given more. Someone's preference is not up to them, never mind someone else. The very fact they label themselves 'trans-woman' and not just a woman shows a distinction and if someone doesn't have a sexual or romantic preference to one then it shouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 08:56 PM
1

There are lots of people that believe abortions should cost money. And if it wasn't abortions it would be something else.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 11:50 PM
2

It's got nothing to do with that though. It's about the fact that the woman is bad because she forced the poor guys to pay her money under false pretences that would have catastrophic effects on their minds. It's not 'good for her' that she thought of a clever scam, it's pure evil.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 10:49 PM
5

She wasn't actually paying for a medical procedure tho. If it happened and it was just one guy and she were pregnant and she then asks for the money that's not evil. Tricking 20 guys into giving you money for a fake abortion of a fake baby is evil, and they most definitely would hate the woman.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:21 PM
6

It still would be because not all 20 people are the father, so she still would extorted 19 people.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:17 PM
3

Still not going to fill the romantic need or the sexual need for women...
/r/MensRights17/08/19 08:49 PM
3

The fact that they don't understand that if one generation is 10% men then the next one will be 1/10 of the size it would've been and that the population would just drop is beyond me. And these sorts of women are the last people that would actually get one of those men.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 10:10 AM
2

All the nuclear engineers just take a day off from the plant lol. Let's see how that goes down...
/r/MensRights12/08/19 08:59 PM
-1

Missing the right to vote and to education, marital rape, having none of your own money, being incapable of providing for yourself when you have nobody else, having to marry someone fast and having to meet all their expectations to maintain your livelihood. During peacetime at least it was worse for women about a century ago.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 07:17 PM
2

I mean over a century ago, the tides have been turned for quite some time
/r/MensRights09/08/19 07:10 PM
3

It's because women have steadily gained more rights from their disadvantaged position and haven't stopped. So we are still painted as the enemy and they still need more rights. It's a matter of time but you can't guarantee how long it will take and then the reverse will eventually happen. People at the front of things like feminism are pressured towards advancement, and so nobody stops when it's equal. This is the way the system has to be anyways to stop everyone's rights diminishing, at least t…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:20 PM
1

I agree, this isn't something that requires the opinion either, which makes it more important as they could've said "have more options to opt out of parenthood e.g abortion"
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:17 PM
1

That's the girlfriend, you can see her holding hands with the man. You are right however in saying that it was the girl that hit her, which doesn't show progress for us.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:30 PM
0

You should've put that in the title then, or in the picture.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 04:00 PM
7

This sub isn't meant to be about women's issues getting attention. If they're actually issues then they need the attention and need to be addressed. It's about men's issues not getting attention. This post itself without any context or the info in the post she made means nothing, and could be used against us.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:09 PM
23

Literally just described heroism, doing something at a possible risk to yourself regardless of who you are helping and without any promise of reward.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 11:52 AM
2

That's because there was real pressure on them, unlike this which is just a hypothetical.
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 07:52 PM
1

Thus is fine, but they need to stop using "we're for equality for everyone" if they want to choose this route. Otherwise they must stick to the statement.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:19 PM
1

This has been reposted too many times now...
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:15 PM
3

Cum and go Drip and dip Nail and bail Nut then strut Plow and ciao Suck and duck Skeet and yeet Hit it and quit it Ram and scram Screw and shoo Shoot and scoot Squirt and revert Smash and dash Skeet and retreat Rape and escape Hump then dump Kiss then dismiss Finger don't linger Cuddle then scuttle Breed then proceed Get lade then evade Jack off then back off Ejaculate and evacuate Go down and skip town Impregnate and immigrate Tear her apart then depart Bust a nut then leave the hut Fuck her as…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:12 PM
3

It will be "dealt with". In the end the same people that'll "deal with it" is the people that made it this way in the first place, most probably anyways.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 07:35 PM
13

They'll say: "men have controlled the judicial system for centuries and so really it is their fault this woman was let off, not that that's a bad thing as we need more women to fight the patriarchy that uses this inequality.".
/r/MensRights08/07/19 07:23 PM
9

It should've been dealt with, but on a massive scale by rethinking our gendered political system, we all know it's there wether they say it or not, that doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 07:22 PM
12

We already had a revolution, unfortunately it was the industrial revolution and didn't fix any political issues.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 07:20 PM
1

So do you believe it should still be a punishable crime, but just not names as a form of rape?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 10:31 AM
1

I've always said, if you've got a problem/disorder society will always accommodate you but you've got to try to treat it.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 10:24 AM
1

In a lot of regards problems but men more, as they are more likely to be assualted (but not sexually), they are 3-4x more likely to be homeless or to commit suicide and young boys are much less likely to become adopted.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 12:23 PM
1

It's still your responsibility to own up about the affair, regardless of if the baby could be his. And nobody is saying they have to get an abortion. The father has a right to know and the woman should have told the other guy too. The baby can still be born without being raised by someone who isnt their biological father.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 03:37 PM
1

Because they don't want those jobs, they want the easy and less physically demanding jobs and so that's all they advocate for. If they wanted equality they'd advocate for quotas in all jobs, not individual ones.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:47 PM
1

But how would they combat the already trained majority male armies and combat trained personnel that already exist?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:45 PM
3

It's like they don't understand the word 'potential'. If a woman is physically capable of getting a knife and stabbing me, or hitting me with their fist, they have the 'potential' to be violent.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:43 PM
2

Unfortunately this would probably only lead to more hate and more mental gymnastics for justifications on the school's side.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:27 PM
27

Because that's what feminists like to call reverse sexism, and the reverse of a bad thing is seen as at least ok.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 03:26 PM
1

With the least amount of posts of out all the other male ones
/r/MensRights30/06/19 09:50 PM
5

Nobody is suggesting violence as the answer here, and it's not acceptable to but anyone unless in self defence, it's going against the idea that women can freely hit men without consequence. The smaller target most often will take more damage, but the smaller target shouldn't be starting violence (goes both ways, men can still be the smaller target).
/r/MensRights30/06/19 04:31 PM
3

Nope, you'd think so but nope.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 03:36 PM
4

They do realise that child support is not meant to be making up for the "bond" they have with the child, it's to help the partner to keep on their feet after the marriage until they can support themselves (not that this is often how it is treated). In what world does having a bond with someone correlate to having a social and legal responsibility to pay for them?
/r/MensRights26/06/19 07:06 AM
2

I think they just have an issue with the way that it is worded, because the ad doesn't explicitly say that, and I think it should because a lot of people mightn't get the message. I do agree though that it's no so much an 'attack' on men and more just an unexplained sign.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 06:59 AM
6

If anything, doesn't this many women all having no evidence and the likelihood of that make it less believable. If one woman doesn't have evidence, could just be poor luck, but the more women that come forward without evidence the more you start to wonder if there is any.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:19 PM
1

A little late, but you can criticise their 'right form of feminism' for not calling the others out in the media, and if they say that there aren't enough of them to take over popular media for feminism, then they must be the minority and as such not real feminists.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:40 AM
3

That philosophy of making stuff free still doesn't work, because surely in theory men would wind up in higher tax brackets and men would also get more of a choice in what they spend. So it wouldn't make it equal anyways????
/r/MensRights22/06/19 12:37 PM
1

I'm not sure about America, but in too many countries it's because it still legally isn't rape, but even still then won't even go as far as to write sexual assualt (which is the crime it's downgraded to if not completely ignored)
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:47 AM
3

I seem to find that most English teachers are at least a little bit feminist, I've had my share of similar issues myself.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:21 PM
31

Honestly I'm surprised that they even guarded it, this shows progress. And good job reporting it! I know too many people who would've just left it.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter