TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fools_gambler2 Archive

View 0 posts and 12 comments by fools_gambler2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Mandatory draft for everyone. If you have a right to get up one day, go to the voting booth, and decide if the country is going to be run by someone who will start a war, you have an obligation to face the consequences of your choices. Sure, women may not be physically fit for all combat roles, but they have to stay and do war supportive things, just like in WW2. Noone gets the option to leave or live a life like the war isn't happening.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 10:26 AM
-1

18-65 mate, look at the situation in Ukraine right now. And having an upper limit for voting isn't that far fetched. At one point as you age, they take your driving license away because they don't think you can safely operate a motor vehicle any more. Having some sort of limit based on cognitive ability, and average life expectancy (should you be able to influence decisions that you probably wont be alive to withness the consequences off 10 years from now?) might make sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 05:45 AM
2

You should have an obligation to perform a war effort supportive service that is compatible with your medical condition. Weapons manufacturing, maintenance, logistics, etc... What you should under no circumstances be allowed to do is to leave the country or lead a life like war isn't happening, as you need to be motivated to keep your government accountable. There should never be a situation when someone looses the right to vote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 11:33 PM
12

In my opinion, a draft in a democracy is derived from the right to vote. If you are allowed to get up one morning, go to the voting place, and decide if the country will be led by someone who will start a war, you should have the obligation to face the consequences of your choices. At the time when only men were allowed to vote, a draft for men only made sense. Nowadays, it should be mandatory for both men and women. The reason why draft is a good example is because it is institutional discrimin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 10:55 PM
0

A draft in a democracy is not about having an effective army. Any kind of draft, regardless of which of the two genders is drafted yields a subpar military, unless you introduce mandatory extensive military service for everyone prior to that, and that isnvery expensive and not practical. A volunteer professional military yields better battlefield results. What the draft serves in a democracy is that it provides accountability, and that is why it should be mandatory for both men and women. If you…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 08:13 AM
5

It is supply and demand, pure and simple. Want proof? Go to Grindr, the gay dating app. No women there, good looking men get plenty of matches, and get more selective. Men on tinder will swipe yes for average women an masse, which gives them an elevated sense of self worth.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:08 PM
2

I mean isn't this true on the internet always? Assume that anything you discuss with strangers will become public. Isn't that the reason a lot of redditors do their best to maintain the anonimity of their profile?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/24 09:50 PM
2

As someone who works in the big 5 tech, I think that the problem is people historically pushing young girls away from STEM even though some of them were interested. I am against the quotas or any other dei afirmative action bullshit, but we should just start encouraging children to go do stuff that interests them regardles of which of the two genders they belong to.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 09:52 AM
8

You are spot on here. Being a bi man is basically a video game cheat code for life. I can go on Grindr and get laid in an hour, so I don't really need the pussy or to deal with the problems of dating women, but I am still open to women provided they are hastle free. It blows their mind when they see that I am not jumping through any hoops...
/r/MensRights11/12/23 07:16 AM
2

If it is circulated in a private group, there is probably nothing you can do. On the plus side, I wouldn't particularly care what people who use that kind of groups think of me...
/r/MensRights18/03/23 07:36 AM
4

I mean yes and no. An AI is not capable of having an opinion on something, therefore, asking it questions such as marital duties which differ based on culture/location is pointless. Yeah, GPT has some pretty stupid leftist safeguards in place. There are ways to overcome them, should you wish to do so, I can show you some if you'd like. To be honest, there was an attempt at an online chatbot without safeguards couple of years back, and it became a cesspool very quickly.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 08:59 AM
28

Not really. While women on average are substantially weaker than men, people who wish to enlist in the military are (usually) not average when it comes to physical fitness. Men are still going to be stronger, but that doesn't mean that some women can't meet the standards.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter