| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Article says women are beginning to go back to traditional gender roles. This is portrayed as bad for women but no mention of the men forced to pay for their life.That's a point against women. Innovation by men has radically reduced the number of children required to maintain a society and the amount of time and effort to maintain a household. And how have women reallocated all this free time and effort? Exactly. Women could have reinvested heavily in their fewer children and gradually entered the workforce as those children age and become more independent. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/22 04:13 AM |
| 4 | Article says women are beginning to go back to traditional gender roles. This is portrayed as bad for women but no mention of the men forced to pay for their life.No, that's exactly what feminism is and always has been. Get food without paying for it. Get the freedoms and authorities of being an adult without the responsibilities which demand them in the first place. Feminism is the never-ending demands of screeching, spoiled children. Do not tolerate tantrums. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/22 03:58 AM |
| 2 | I have never been told not to cry by a man, only women and children.Yes and no. Emotionally incontinent men are rare to the point that I don't know if I've ever even encountered one. That's why if the dam breaks with a man, you can be reasonably certain that the cause is something major. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/21 01:30 AM |
| 1 | If it's appropriate to teach men not to rape, it should be appropriate to teach women not to murder their children.Children "raised" by single mothers already have statistical outcomes which are the stuff of nightmares, so that ship has already sailed. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/21 01:16 AM |
| 1 | If it's appropriate to teach men not to rape, it should be appropriate to teach women not to murder their children.Women are the gatekeepers of reproduction. That makes them the primarily responsible party. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/21 01:13 AM |
| 1 | If it's appropriate to teach men not to rape, it should be appropriate to teach women not to murder their children.You can give up or have stripped from you all parental rights. Parental responsibilities are another matter entirely for men. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/21 01:11 AM |
| 1 | If it's appropriate to teach men not to rape, it should be appropriate to teach women not to murder their children.Never going to happen for the simple reason that there's no other party to take responsibility. The state is a gestalt of male labor and productivity and women are net consumers. The result would be the mass abandonment of children like was seen in the early days of the soviet Union. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/21 01:10 AM |
| 2 | If it's appropriate to teach men not to rape, it should be appropriate to teach women not to murder their children.Because it's not his child. It's her child, then the state's child, then he can play father if both the woman and the state permit him to. Oh wait, neither she nor the state itself can actually provide for the child, so better force the accountability onto the man. This is one of the many results of allowing women the perks of being full fledged adults without making it contingent on fulfilling the duties that demands. | /r/MensRights | 24/09/21 01:07 AM |
| 1 | I have never been told not to cry by a man, only women and children.The thing is that there technically are. Genital mutilation, even if not explicitly outlawed, is already illegal under prohibitions on assault, children endangerment, and conspiracy. The legal system just doesn't care that people are flagrantly committing felonies on a daily basis. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/21 11:41 PM |
| 2 | The fact that this got 800k likes disgusts meDepends what is meant by bad. For example, carrying out red flag orders is a felony under federal law. Every cop in a jurisdiction where such an order is issued is duty bound to arrest those involved, whether they're judges or other cops. AFAIK, none have ever done so. And that's just one example of cops enforcing unlawful edicts and failing to enforce the law. The best any cop can be and remain employed is to be lousy at their job, i.e. a bad cop. | /r/AntiFeminists | 19/03/21 07:12 PM |
| 1 | The fact that this got 800k likes disgusts meAnd this is a perfect example of why racist has been demoted from word to noise. | /r/AntiFeminists | 19/03/21 07:02 PM |
| 1 | The fact that this got 800k likes disgusts meLol, no it doesn't. Since before it was even called feminism, it was about getting stuff for free. | /r/AntiFeminists | 19/03/21 06:50 PM |
| 3 | The fact that this got 800k likes disgusts meThere's a rabbit hole of female psychology there. | /r/AntiFeminists | 19/03/21 06:47 PM |
| 7 | The fact that this got 800k likes disgusts meWhat exactly is the "actual" definition? Since before they even called themselves feminists, they've been after the rights and authorities of men without the responsibilities which required men to have them in the first place. There's nothing equal about getting for free what others have to pay for. | /r/AntiFeminists | 19/03/21 06:42 PM |
| 2 | The fact that this got 800k likes disgusts meWe live in a society where women can and have falsely accused men they've never even met (see mattress girl) and rarely face any sort of consequences for it. They may even receive praise for their psychopathy. *insert Cheeto deadbolt meme* No sane man is going to risk everything on women's moral fortitude. | /r/AntiFeminists | 19/03/21 06:26 PM |
| 1 | A reminder when talking about your philosophies in life outside this sub and IRLLol, of course fartsniffersofreddit are up to their normal antics. | /r/MGTOW | 04/01/20 02:57 AM |
| 2 | The 2010’sCoping mechanism: an adaptation to environmental stress that is based on conscious or unconscious choice and that enhances control over behavior or gives psychological comfort. That sounds perfectly applicable to MGTOW. Since when did cope have a negative connotation anyway? So happiness is in superposition until acted upon by a future event which may not even happen? You're just making a no true Scotsman fallacy. Happiness in this case is akin to a drug with a high of uncertain length and poten… | /r/MGTOW | 03/01/20 05:43 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter