forty_three Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Sticks and stones may break my bones.... Yeah, that's fair, could've been fun to see. I think she was just too frustrated to think about joking at that moment	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/20 07:47 PM
1	Sticks and stones may break my bones.... But isn't that kind of like saying "oh, he punched you? Why would you go and punch him back? Clearly it would've been better if you just walked away." Which, while generally true, can get frustrating if you keep getting punched and keep getting told it's better to just walk away	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/20 07:00 PM
2	Sticks and stones may break my bones.... I mean, she wasn't there to do comedy, though... (Edit: though, I admit she could have done so to diffuse the situation. But I think her whole point is that women shouldn't constantly be having to just 'laugh it off' when people are patronizing or aggressive to them)	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/20 06:27 PM
1	Sticks and stones may break my bones.... It's not really about feminism in this case, at least not like, foaming mouth feminism. It's just about whether calling an employee or coworker "sweety" is a reasonable behavior. He admits that there's not really an equivalent for men (the unspoken truth being that if a woman acted like men in that context, she'd come across as a crazy person like Jane Lynch's boss character in the 40 Year Old Virgin). His "point" was NOT that "women should just suck it up and laugh it off," as a bunch of people…	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/20 06:24 PM
2	Sticks and stones may break my bones.... Yeah, I find it hard to call her out on this one. He was being pretty rational for the entire clip, then riiiight at the end made a directly condescending and somewhat misogynistic remark to rile her up. She was on the program specifically to talk about this kind of thing; if she hadn't responded, she would've just been selling out her entire point, and she would probably be getting an equal amount of fury from women pissed that she let that comment go	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/20 05:51 PM
1	Sticks and stones may break my bones.... The original interview is about "pet names" for women being used in inappropriate contexts (cat-calling, or in the workplace, in particular)	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/20 05:47 PM
0	Sticks and stones may break my bones.... But clearly as we see here, groups with less social power don't have the capacity to ostracize bad behavior. Let's consider an example of a woman who complains publicly about being called "sweety" in a work setting - do you think society will successfully "ostracize" the person who did so? (In this context, it seems like the majority of people are more interested in telling her that she's being too sensitive) Whereas if I were to mention a woman referring to me as "stud" in a meeting, that would…	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/05/20 05:44 PM
7	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings Woof, this thread though.. I seriously never realized how bad the trolls and bots could get	/r/MensRights	06/11/17 03:44 PM
7	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings One hundred percent those three are all the same people. At least the first two are both director of the R&D company I mentioned. The third has zero other info in their profile (and his name is "Paul Paul"?). If you think there's a better source out there, shoot us a link.	/r/MensRights	06/11/17 03:10 PM
7	Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings His LinkedIn profile. He's some 3d printing proponent, as well as the head of an R&D contracting firm that (tin foil hat on) probably benefits heavily from having his name associated with any highly publicized research, regardless of curriculum. Edit: lol @ downvotes. Obv no one actually tried searching him on LinkedIn?	/r/MensRights	06/11/17 02:40 PM