| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | I think the solution to TRP and inceldom is for a person to have a consensual purely sexual encounter with a woman.Omg Thinking women are the cause and/or solution to your/male problems is why guys are in this predicament in the first place. Work on yourself! | /r/ExRedPill | 16/01/24 09:20 PM |
| 4 | How to find my type of women when dating?No, he doesn't actually like women, as a response to this question in a comment of his: "Can I ask what you find appealing about it? They're low-maintenance. Less bullshit or drama. Unlikely to be the kind to sleep around a lot. Unlikely to cheat. Won't be shallow." | /r/ExRedPill | 12/12/23 11:51 PM |
| 11 | How to find my type of women when dating?Oh so you don't actually like women hey? Go somewhere else please. | /r/ExRedPill | 12/12/23 11:48 PM |
| 26 | I cant get the 80/20 Rule and "Hypergamy" theories out of my mind.And isn't part of the red pill thing that when your partner loses her arbitrary value that you've assigned to her (like getting fat after pregnancy or over 40) you just leave her for a younger model? | /r/ExRedPill | 30/11/23 11:17 PM |
| 8 | For those who likes to read YouTube comments especially on news articles or anything political even if you think its innocent watch out as the comments are full of misogyny more misogyny than any Red pill standardsIt's the same with instagram comments. It can be the most benign reel but the comments are often sickening | /r/ExRedPill | 05/11/23 01:22 AM |
| 10 | Questions about evolutionary psychology?Some of the shit that redpillers say can also just be answered by asking and listening to women (obviously it differs between women but there will be general trend), but heaven forbid they do something as simple and obvious at that! | /r/ExRedPill | 30/10/23 11:40 PM |
| 1 | FYI the clitoris is as important to sexual response as the ENTIRE PENISEven a 'vaginal orgasm' is only achieved with stimulation of the clitoris. Hitting the female g-spot is hitting the lower 'arms' of the clitoris from inside the vagina. It's a much larger organ than what you see from the outside. If you didn't have one how would you orgasm? I'd like to know | /r/MensRights | 26/07/18 07:50 PM |
| 0 | FYI the clitoris is as important to sexual response as the ENTIRE PENISWithout a clitoris? No, you can't | /r/MensRights | 26/07/18 02:26 AM |
| 0 | FYI the clitoris is as important to sexual response as the ENTIRE PENISIt's not less sensitive no, but without the glands you can't orgasm. Without foreskin you can. That's the difference. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/18 08:05 PM |
| 4 | FYI the clitoris is as important to sexual response as the ENTIRE PENISYou quoted the first paragraph there, but did you even read it? Her entire comment was advocating AGAINST infant circumcision. She was asking those questions because the answers tell you not to circumcise. We don't chop off the body parts of infants because of possible risks of cancer etc. So we shouldn't do it to the foreskin (adults can make their own choices). You grossly misinterpreted that. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/18 10:50 AM |
| 7 | "Tired of lies and game players. Are there any GOOD men left??"So you can only have sex in one position? Because I assume if your cock has a bend in it and you have sex with the girl facing the other way round it just totally ruins things. And if you are only have sex in one position I can totally see why these girls are seeking sex elsewhere. | /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen | 31/10/17 02:50 AM |
| 1 | Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage?not a chance bro. my friends past and/or current relationship history validate my point. What they do reflects what they say. None of them would be interested in just sleeping with a random guy (especially one who sleeps around) let alone who just slept with someone they know. If having a lot of partners is a trait you find undesirable in a woman, then perhaps your should be surrounding yourself with different women. women you've described of course do exist, but there are plenty of them that ar… | /r/askTRP | 24/05/14 05:38 AM |
| 1 | Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage?Its almost like we should just treat each other as equal human beings or something | /r/askTRP | 23/05/14 12:08 PM |
| 1 | Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage?Myself and every other woman I know find men who sleep around less attractive. And we also hold ourselves to the same standards | /r/askTRP | 23/05/14 12:01 PM |
| 1 | Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage?Like some other species a man's biological imperative is to ensure the survival of his offspring. His genes. A man will protect his offspring to ensure both the survival of his genes and his species. Paired monogamous relationships are part of the reason we have been so successful over other species. As there are two parents protecting the offspring rather than one. Many men look for women with good mother qualities not just a semen depository. | /r/askTRP | 23/05/14 11:50 AM |
| 1 | Why is it 'bad' if females have a large volume of sexual partners previous to a serious LTR/Marriage?Yes women do care. | /r/askTRP | 23/05/14 11:38 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter