TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

found314 Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by found314 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I'm with you up until your conclusion... A father walking out on his kids is incredibly destructive and irresponsible. A sexually promiscuous girl aborting her child is also incredibly destructive and irresponsible. These are both bad things, not both things we should consider acceptable.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:22 PM
-3

Let's play this out: Say I am involved in MensRights. Someone thinks that is wrong. They grab my info and post it on a website. OK... big deal. Let's say they go a step further and call my boss! And tell him that I was standing up for fairness and equality online! Yeah, no one cares. Because what I was doing was morally defensible, just, and good. Now let's apply these same things to a moderator of the /r/incest subreddit. That is a different situation. My question to you is: Why?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:33 PM
-21

And you are? I'm saying let everyone look at this behavior and let them decide! You are the one trying to hush these people up. And MR is the one banning these websites ultimately ending this discussion. I really feel like you are on the wrong side of this issue. Do you really want to side with the people trying to hide themselves encouraging and teaching others to engage in incest?! Or the ones doing what they can to stand up and say this is wrong. No one is trying to be the moral judge. They a…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:34 AM
-13

Well, there is the issue of consent... But sure, expose them too. Why not?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:24 AM
-33

Not necessarily. I'm fine with contacting neighbors, family members, and employers. Letting them know of the disturbingly perverse behavior they are taking part in under the guise of anonymity. Other forms of doxing are illegal and definitely wrong. Such as selling social security numbers or sending death threats to their family, ect... Or demanding money to keep the information private. If any of this is going on with the mods of /r/incest or /r/creepyshots or others... that is a different stor…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:22 AM
-22

Who decides what is bad or not? Society does. That's why exposing them is acceptable behavior. (Blackmail is a separate issue. If they are demanding money or else they will release the information that is wrong. But as far as I can tell, that is not happening PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong) Every community needs to evaluate itself. For example, feel free to share my involvement with this subreddit to whoever you please. I would be honored if other people knew I was speaking out for fairness, equ…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:07 AM
-26

Gawker is not taking anything down. It is these subreddits that are banning these sites. who gives a fuck what the subreddits do? I do. Promoting incest and voyeurism is unacceptable. It is perfectly fine to expose these people (who also recognize this is unacceptable behavior.) In this instance, anonymity is just enabling this extreme, perverse behavior. As for MR getting hit... Let them come. I'm proud of supporting /r/mensrights and would be happy if others knew of my involvement with this su…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:19 AM
-42

As for Creepshots... taking unsolicited pictures of women in public for the sole purpose of perverse, online idolization is absolutely morally reprehensible. incest and jailbait are the same story. Promoting the sexualization of underage girls and encouraging sex with family members is perverse and should be exposed. It is not ok to consider this behavior acceptable and exposing these people (who try to hide their promoting these perversions anonymously) is perfectly acceptable (so long as there…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:05 AM
-34

The difference is between a subreddit whose purpose is to encourages fairness and decency vs a subreddit whose purpose is to encourages extreme and illegal perversions.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:18 AM
-29

Let them come. I'm proud of supporting /r/mensrights. Being against us will show them to be the harassing misandrists we know them to be. But that is a different situation than going after a subreddit whose sole purpose is to encourage extreme perversions.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:15 AM
-47

Publicly shaming is one side of the coin. The other side is exposing extreme morally reprehensible behavior. I'd say there are two possible scenarios here: If the "journalist" is asking for money (or something like that) or else his information will be released... I missed that part and that is definitely wrong! If he is simply releasing this information because sunlight is the best disinfectant... that's a different story. That is good. Don't forget, these subreddits in question are supporting …
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:19 AM
-75

I don't know... I have a problem with this. I think being anonymous can have its problems. It can definitely have its temptations. If you want to be a moderator of a morally reprehensible subreddit, I (hesitantly) don't have a problem with you being exposed. It's time we reject this "Every aspect of Reddit is beneficial" idea. People involved in taking pictures of underage girls and hidden shots of women for the sole purpose to be sexualized online is wrong. It is something that should be expose…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:07 AM
-3

Me. Let it remain the parents decision. Just educate the public so they can make a good choice
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:40 PM
0

(thats probably why they spend so much time on reddit) haha
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:52 PM
1

Their basis of morality rests in what causes the least amount of pain to someone. That's why. After I figured that out... it explained a lot.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:17 PM
2

Its because men usually list more dependents than women.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 10:30 AM
2

This is the wrong way of going about it. If you want Man to be treated better do it in an objective, substantive way. Not as a comparison to women. Men's rights shouldn't be focused on as an imbalance compared to women... it should be focused on as an imbalance compared to a higher standard of humanity.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 06:45 PM
0

That paragraph was excellent. Too bad her last paragraph made me put my face in my palms and shake my head. ಠ_ಠ But I've been talking about that inconsistency regarding slutwalk for a while now. As a communicaton Theorist, its easy to see what a man or woman is trying to say by how they dress themselves. It all falls under the nonverbal communication category and IS important. You can't dress like a whore and then expect other people to not pick up on the messages you're sending. I'm glad Ms Wen…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:21 PM
44

Haha /r/lgbt's Rule #1: No homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, racism, or sexism. Bans you for promoting equality...
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:11 AM
9

It does take a fair amount of courage to question your own beliefs...
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:08 AM
2

Comments and pleas like that only come when they recognize you're on to something. Keep up the good work, /r/MensRights
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:47 AM
-5

Upvote for keeping your true priorities in mind. You, sir, are an inspiration to us all! ;)
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:31 PM
10

I think the issue isn't so much that Huggies went with this ad campaign... but rather how effective this probably will be to their target audience (women) Sure it's inappropriate, but its that this type of ad would be persuasive is what really offends me
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:30 PM
2

excuse me while I go throw mine away...
/r/MensRights30/01/12 12:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter