| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Act like a cunt, get splashed like a cuntOr just get water splashed in your face like every comedy from the 80s. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 28/10/16 05:01 PM |
| 13 | Double standards in sportsThat's the problem, though. These aren't different standards. When people aren't able to physically compete in the same league or division, we create new divisions so everyone can enjoy sports. We create divisions based on age, gender, and even weight. You can't let a 210 lb. boy wrestle against 130 lb. boys because it's not competitive. You can't let high school seniors compete against kids in junior high because it's not competitive. You can't let boys play in the girls' divisions because it's… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/12 06:53 AM |
| 22 | Double standards in sportsMales still have a genetic predisposition for higher bone and muscle density as well as greater lung capacity, even in childhood. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/12 06:37 AM |
| 4 | Saw this on facebook todayWell, this ridiculous conversation has come to an end for me. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/12 04:56 AM |
| 2 | Saw this on facebook todayI didn't realize that I was being given sole credit for the "no means no" campaign. If that's the case, I've been severely undercompensated for my consulting work. Remember, though, that this is not a legislative proposal, per se. Nobody's talking about a "no means no" law. We are talking about a set of principles that people adopt on their own in order to avoid rape and being falsely accused of rape. People are free to communicate however they like. If we collectively agree that sexy talk is a … | /r/MensRights | 05/07/12 03:27 AM |
| 5 | Saw this on facebook todayWell, we're talking about an anti-rape program that aims to take the ambiguity out of rape cases. That's the whole point of the "no means no" mantra. However, girlwriteswhat originally argued that there is no ambiguity in her definition of "no," even though her wording is such that she includes the actual word "no" in her sexual banter in situations in which she is consenting to sexual activities. That leaves a door wide open to interpretation of the word "no." The "no means no" campaign is an a… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/12 08:53 PM |
| 6 | Saw this on facebook todayI can understand what you're trying to say, but you have to admit that a terse reading of your comment is ambiguous at best. | /r/MensRights | 04/07/12 04:03 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter