TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fox_wesley Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by fox_wesley on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

3edgy5me
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:49 PM
1

Damn dude. You're so convinced you're "in the right"... Believe it or not, I do think you're probably right about the statistics. And if you had posted the source a little while ago instead of slinging mud, I'd have discussed it with you, including some of the limitations that are obvious in the methods of research that prevent the findings from being generalized... But honestly, I don't really give a shit anymore. Congrats bro. If you've made it this far, here's the source dipshit never include…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:38 PM
-1

Hot damn you are pretty fucking lazy. You saw the comment with the source, and yet couldn't copy and paste it in to this comment? Or even reference the person who posted the original source?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:29 PM
0

Women killing their children is much, much more prevalent than shooting rampages perpetrated by men. There you go. Now you've made a statement, so I'm allowed to say... ...Source? Those are facts, you can't dispute them, so you're arguing semantics about sources. Yes I can. Here, I'll dispute both of them. Women killing their own children happens so rarely it's basically an anomaly, not indicative of a trend or even comparable to the number of people killed by men in shooting rampages. See how e…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:07 PM
1

Easier than continuing the comment thread without providing any useful information other than your clever little ad-hominem quips?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:58 PM
–

If you were capable of using Google, If finding an unbiased source that supports your claim using google were that easy, you could have done that a few comments ago. When you make a claim, you need to provide proof, not a second argument and not a way to possibly find proof. Actual proof that you're not just pulling stuff out of your ass.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 01:53 PM
–

http://time.com/2871792/enough-with-fathers-day-you-heard-me-endfathersday/
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:42 AM
1

Ah. Does that have something to do with the director? Like if the director doesn't have the same aversion to seeing genitals that you do, then he lacks the ability to make good R-Rated movies? Edit: Also, does that mean you can turn a bad R-rated movie into a good R-rated movie by closing your eyes for the scene with penises?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:02 AM
1

Wait, what's that in answer to? I feel like you're purposefully being vague, so it's more difficult for me to figure out EXACTLY where your prejudices against male genitalia that keep you from enjoying good Rated-R material.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:52 PM
–

You didn't answer my first question! :( Have you ever seen your own penis? If you get so grossed out, how do you maintain an erection when having sex? Do you imagine you're a girl, going to town on another girl with a strap-on?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:47 PM
–

Okay. So you wouldn't watch the best movies that have ever been made if there was a penis in it at some point on screen? No matter how many vaginas or breasts there were in the entire movie? That seems a bit... odd, no? As a bit of an aside, do you watch porn, and if so, have you ever seen any other flavor other than lesbian porn?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:41 PM
–

Ahahahaha. Now I'm 90% sure you're trolling, but i'll feed you a bit more because I'm feeling generous. Why is female nudity a beautiful thing, and male nudity an abomination? Is that based on some objective reasoning, or a personal opinion of yours?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:30 PM
–

Why's that? You think female nudity is isn't offensive, but male nudity is? Edit: And please explain why female nudity can be important to the story, but male nudity can't.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:21 PM
9

No, I meant on the other subreddit. You dick. I support what he said.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:43 AM
6

Reported your post so the mods see it sooner. Edit: I guess I wasn't clear. I reported it to the mods in the OTHER SUBREDDIT so they see it. I assume edtastic stands by what he says, as do I, so I made sure the mods saw the post. Jesus. Quit messaging me with your fucking hatemail.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 02:05 AM
32

Jezebel is one step up from tumblr and is an embarrassment to feminism. And in 2013 they had 23 million (MILLION) monthly pageviews. http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/10/anna-holmes-book-jezebel-interview You can always find a radical saying something shitty about someone else, but with that kind of audience, is Jezebel really a fringe radical site, or a reflection on what many people actually believe?
/r/MensRights02/04/14 01:59 AM
–

You're right, it was actually 1:15 when he said "Unfortunately, thanks to the general susceptibility of women to such stupid ideas... Correcting a woman on this is a great way to ensure you don't get laid."
/r/MensRights08/02/14 04:27 PM
–

Closed the video after almost a minute. Didn't even get to hear the questions. Discriminatory bullshit like this just makes us look bad.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 02:50 AM
–

? What the hell are you talking about? Did you forget to include a link to the article you're referencing, or is this some rant because of something someone said to you, and you feel like you need to vent to anonymous strangers?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:42 PM
2

I think they're more upset at the fact that people would think it's okay to show their genitals to everyone unsolicited on the front of a magazine.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:52 AM
1

The context and motivation of the photo does matter. The intent of the distributor does matter. I disagree. Without the background of why they're doing it, any passerby would just see several vulgar pictures on the front of a newspaper. It doesn't matter if they were showing vaginas to empower women or raise money for starving orphans, it's still vulgar and crude to display your genitals to people unsolicited. Especially on the front of a magazine. And despite how much they're denying it, I thin…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:51 AM
1

Okay, that's all I was wondering; if the people that are supporting this are doing so because of the intention, and that they would be fine with a magazine being sold that was covered in unmanicured penises (penii?).
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:15 PM
0

It's not a stupid question, it's the logical extension of what YOU said. So either you're acting illogically, which I'm more inclined to believe, or you secretly have some really complex morals which say why it's okay for women to subject everyone to pictures of their genitalia, and it's not okay for men to do it. Which one is it, rogersmith25?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:13 PM
3

So in this case the intention is what mattered the most? Meaning, if a man sends a woman a picture of his penis, in an attempt to show her what a 'normal' penis looks like... is it okay?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:43 PM
5

What the fuck? At the time of posting this, it's sitting at 29, how does this have a positive score? Mods, please remove this hate-filled crap.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:49 PM
-11

...That's Family Guy. Are you going to get offended at South Park next?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 03:29 PM
1

Your evidence doesn't really apply, it says he was forced to live as a girl from age 9, after being raised as a boy. It doesn't at all apply to the idea of gender as a social construct, since he had already learned from birth to age 9 to identify as a boy, being forced to change his identity is something that would definitely cause mental distress. It has nothing to do with whether boys will still feel like boys after puberty, or whether that proves or disproves gender as a social construct. But…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 12:51 AM
1

The idea than is that if we take a girl and raise her as a boy, or we take a boy and raise him as a girl we should see that the boy or girl raise as the opposite gender should grow up to act as the gender they are raised to be. But instead these children usually just end up commiting suicide. Um... We know this because it was done in the case of several boys with botched circumcisions. ... The boys, raised as girls with female genitles, began to play with boy things, and act like boys. Uh. I'm g…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 10:46 PM
1

Cis-gendered is wrong because it relies on the concept of gender as a societal construct which has not been born out by reality. Can you elaborate more on what you mean by 'gender as a societal construct... has not been born out by reality'? Gender as a social construct seems to be accepted by the general anthropological community... Why do you think they're wrong? Here's the wikipedia page if you need a bit of background. Take with a grain of salt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_constructi…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:35 PM
2

If soemone whats to change there gender I 100% support that, but if gender identity is just a concept then hormones would not be necessary. You are correct in that it is a concept and something that a person can personally feel/identify with. Hormones are sometimes used by some transgendered people in order to make their physical appearance match up with their mental self-image, and up to the discretion of the person choosing to take them. There aren't, for instance, a lot of options for trangen…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:58 PM
1

Sorry, guess the sarcasm was lost. I don't think anyone denies the possibility that somewhere women live in fear of men's physical strength. I was attempting to point out that without evidence, it's as silly as comparing it to women living in fear of men's ability to grow facial hair.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:48 AM
–

And some live in fear of men's ability to grow facial hair, quite possibly.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:23 AM
–

I think that women HATE men's superior strength Woah. Where did that come from? You had a decent point until that GIANT leap in logic. Is it possible that the women in question are upset about real issues and inequalities?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:55 PM
0

I agree with your statement up until the end. I don't think women in general, particularly feminists, are reacting to men's inherently stronger physiques or some other feeling of inferiority to men. I'd really like to see where you got that from, because in my opinion, the anger is produced more by instances of institutionalized sexism as well as more commonplace behaviors that can lead some women to feel discriminated against. It was a good argument until you basically said "women are just jeal…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:32 PM
–

Teachers should not start relationships with their students. Especially when they're in the fragile developmental state of high school. It was mentioned above, but there's a power balance that must be maintained between student and teacher, and not prosecuting cases like this can encourage abuse in cases where the intentions might not be so pure.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:12 PM
4

I hate that this woman did this, and I hate that she's being super self-righteous about it, but I'm cringing hearing the guys on the call say they want to kill her. Come on. There's other ways to express anger than going straight to threats. She's an awful, manipulative person, but she doesn't deserve to die, and you look like a knuckle-dragging idiot when you threaten her.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:05 PM
2

Wow, you're dumb. I never said anything about whether you were right or wrong, so why did you put 'wrong' in quotes, if you weren't quoting me? Just to put words in my mouth so you could argue against the comment you wish I posted? Read my comment again, and see if you can figure out why you were down-voted on this post too. Hint: it's the same reason as before.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:41 PM
–

This is mensrights, not /r/conservative. Criticism is fine, just keep it on topic. There's no reason to throw 'liberals' into the mix, for the same reason there's no reason to say On the other hand, feminists and jews prefer to censor alternate views Even if you believe it wholeheartedly. You're getting downvoted for that little bit of irrelevant lumping together. Not because people are trying to censor you. EDIT: Even if you provided proof that liberals (or jews) censor people, it still wouldn'…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 11:46 PM
7

What the hell is this? I feel like I'm reading a KKK pamphlet some crazy dude on the subway gave me.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 01:44 AM
–

Well, anecdotes aren't data, but I guess I can counter you by saying that every single one of my gay friends just came right out as gay, with no steps at "bisexual junction" or whatever. Hence why I followed my statement with I'm not pulling the No True Scotsman but identifying as bisexual does seem to be the step most people take before coming out. ... I get the idea from talking to people who identify as bisexual that discrimination against the bi community is pretty rampant, especially from o…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:32 AM
–

Re: Bisexuals - Hadn't seen that video. And while I think he does marginalize bisexuals a bit (there are legitimately people who have attractions to both sexes) he does make a good point: Every single one of my gay friends came out as bisexuals before coming out as gay. I'm not pulling the No True Scotsman, but identifying as bisexual does seem to be the step most people take before coming out. There are legitimate bisexuals, no doubt about it. But I sort of agree with him here: most gay people …
/r/MensRights15/11/11 02:45 AM
–

Re: Biphobic, it seems more like he's discouraging gay and straight people from engaging in long-term exclusive relationships with bisexuals. How is this biphobic? It actually seems like a pretty good suggestion based on what he's said before. He already highly discourages monogamy, but says that when you do have a monogamous relationship, you HAVE to be everything for your partner, and if someone is bisexual they have desires you can't fulfill. So either your bisexual boyfriend or girlfriend de…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 02:04 AM
–

I wasn't aware he had trans/bi-phobic views. Can you elaborate?
/r/MensRights15/11/11 12:53 AM
–

Whenever people hold this post up as to why this subreddit is evil, let me be the first to say, he is joking.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 08:04 AM
–

What was the episode called?
/r/MensRights03/10/11 06:48 PM
5

You can't link to 4chan threads, they expire in a few minutes.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 05:14 PM
–

I realize this may be an unpopular opinion, but what a horribly unbalanced article. He's not even TRYING to pretend he's seeing both sides. I can't speak to the validity of the advice, but jesus.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:24 AM
–

I found an article that claims a man was raped while passed out at a party, and forced to pay child support. Although this isn't what you're asking. http://www.avoiceformen.com/2010/10/04/legally-obscene/
/r/MensRights29/06/11 10:30 PM
2

I don't think they consider it to be 'okay'. It looks like it's actually the reason one of the main characters decides to murder the woman. That's pretty far from condoning that kind of behavior.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 06:22 PM
–

Was interested, couldn't read the article, lost interest.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 05:00 PM
–

Come on /r/mensrights. Go back and read all these posts, and replace 'boyfriend' with 'girlfriend', and see if you still say the same thing. I don't care if she cheated on her boyfriend, she still deserves respect, and butting into the business of someone you don't know well to tell their SO that they're cheating on them without giving the SO an opportunity to come clean is not just wrong, it's borderline evil.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 06:51 AM
–

Wrong, sir. Just give her a few days notice, then tell him anyway. You don't need to trust her. As well, she deserves as much respect as the next person, even if she's cheating on her boyfriend. It's none of OPs damn business, but if you're doing it to protect the boyfriend, at least let her come clean.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 01:54 AM
–

But you should confront her first and tell her if she doesn't come clean, you'll tell him. If you're going to interfere in something that's none of your damn business, in for a penny, in for a pound. Show enough respect to her to give her the chance to come clean.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 01:24 AM
–

Lying on his family room floor with assault weapons trained on him, shouts of "pedophile!" and "pornographer!" and "You're a creep ... just admit it," they said. What the fuck. Assault weapons for child pornography? Late night raid, insults, pressuring the person to confess... Seriously?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 08:05 PM
1

Against robots, it's completely forgivable. Robots can't be reasoned with. In all seriousness though, I think the nonsequitor is the whole point of the ad campaign.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 02:05 AM
1

That guy doesn't trust robots. I don't blame him.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 01:29 AM
3

What the hell. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSpg2apddiw&feature=relmfu
/r/MensRights17/04/11 04:13 PM
1

Nothing to do with the article, but the guy that they picked for that picture looks like a mentally challenged hoverhands.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 03:40 PM
3

So I propose a simple test to determine if you, individually, are a victim of gender unfairness. If a genie gave you the chance to magically switch your gender, and become a member of the other sex, would you do it? That's not exactly fair. I love having a penis, and I wouldn't become a woman, given the choice. However, in certain cases, I would definitely prefer the treatment society gives women over men.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 10:08 PM
1

They do know, but they use it anyway. Why? I have no idea. Because they aren't held responsible, since the person 'consented' to the treatment. I disagree. Not conductive to good conversation. Consider yourself downvoted until you explain why, or what you mean.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:35 AM
1

There's actually a warning on the package that contraindicates it's use in pregnant women, and it's been known to occasionally cause things like uterine rupture and death. So the doctors would know about that better than the patients. And I'm not saying erase all doctor-patient contact, I just think doctors should have the decision making power in the relationship. A doctor who is treating a patient should damn well know that their patient is pregnant, and should choose not to use a drug that ha…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 03:35 AM
2

Sure, a patient can refuse treatment by a doctor if they like. I think the problem comes when that's extended to patients being able to refuse specific treatments. A patient knows if they are going to be treated by a doctor, they are most likely going to get better. And can refuse to be treated by one. I don't think in 99% of cases patients know enough about the treatments that are being offered them to make an informed decision on whether they should take the treatment or not. So basically, I'm…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 07:15 PM
–

I don't know why they give the patient, or the patients family the last say on the procedures a doctor performs. They haven't had any sort of medical training, and the only background they have is what the medical staff tell them. They are in no way licensed to make decisions.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 05:36 PM
2

No, this is the exact wrong place for things like this. It's a serious discussion on the rights of men, and no place for rampant sexism. If you aren't told, you'll never know. Don't post things like this in this subreddit, it gives us a bad name.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 01:57 AM
–

Um, no. Why did you think this belongs in men's rights?
/r/MensRights23/03/11 10:52 PM
–

Isn't that threatening the person's life, which is illegal?
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:33 PM
0

That background gives me a headache.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 10:02 PM
1

This title disgusts and saddens me. I'm a man, and if my girlfriend did any of these(except for probably 2 and 10), I would be impressed. This is less about 'chivalry' (or whatever bastardized version of chivalry this title refers to) and more about showing that you care about your significant other, enough to put small bits of effort into making them happy, and expecting no reward or compensation.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 11:51 PM
0

When these types of things are expected, you're not dating the right kind of people.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 11:48 PM
1

Wow. You are a horribly jaded person. I feel sorry for whatever happened to influence you to think like this.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 11:47 PM
–

Guys getting hit in the balls is usually seen as pretty funny. See: Jackass 1,2,3D
/r/MensRights09/03/11 06:21 PM
2

That's cute.
/r/MensRights08/03/11 05:49 PM
0

didn't even realize there was a men's rights movement. Hate to grammar nazi on ya.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:57 PM
4

He made a good point though; if he'd murdered someone, his neighbors wouldn't know.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 04:53 AM
0

I didn't say that it did mean shit in the UK, -376 karma troll. Simply stating a fact, and that it wouldn't happen in the US.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 12:48 AM
–

I'm pretty sure that falls under the label as 'Cruel and unusual punishment', made illegal by the Bill of Rights in the US constitution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
/r/MensRights05/02/11 08:23 PM
1

And there are a couple of Christians on the /r/atheism subreddit, and there are a couple of conservatives on the liberal subreddits, etc. That doesn't mean you shouldn't post a post dealing with the subject content of the subreddit, for fear of flame from the vocal minority.
/r/MensRights31/01/11 07:32 PM
–

If you think so little of /r/mensrights, why do you post here? There's an extremist fringe in every subreddit, luckily one of the features of reddit is to allow us to filter out those idiots with downvotes. Perhaps she wants a simple discussion on the rights of men, and the opinions of people who might be flexing those rights?
/r/MensRights31/01/11 01:15 AM
–

Don't listen to that clown. This subreddit isn't a haven for Misogynists or anything like that, it's a forum for calm discussion about the rights of men, and having a vasectomy is one of those rights. This is a 100% appropriate post for this subreddit.
/r/MensRights31/01/11 01:14 AM
2

I think that might be because his job is to get women to sleep with him, and then report it to their husbands. I know if the roles were reversed, I would feel more than a bit uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 09:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter