foxehknoxeh Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. I agree that love is a word that some people throw around, and that it isn't discardable or replaceable, but that doesn't mean there's nothing that can happen to change it.	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 11:04 AM
1	Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. I'm also lucky enough to have two parents who are still together, but of all my friends who have divorced parents I don't think a single one was raised only by their mom. In fact, the first friend I remember who had divorced parents almost never saw her mom. Other than differing anecdotal experience, the one thing in your comment that I disagree with is that you're letting a stigma affect your decision on what to be in life. That kind of thinking only helps to perpetuate gender based bias. Sure …	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 11:02 AM
1	Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. I'm sure it's a factor, but it seems as though that's the only factor you see in deciding to keep or fix an unhappy marriage and I just don't see it being as big of an issue as feeling as though you don't love your spouse anymore to give one example.	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 10:51 AM
1	Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. In my opinion you are overestimating the effect of this custody bias on deciding to get a divorce. I think it has more to do with a general feeling that putting effort into anything isn't worth it when it can just be discarded, among men and women nowadays. I also think you are overestimating the bias. For one thing, most divorced or separated parents decide custody on their own. According to this website, http://www.divorcepeers.com/stats18.htm , almost no cases go to trial at all, and when the…	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 10:49 AM
1	Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. That is blatantly not true. I did do my own search and I expected that as a 24 year old male on the internet you would be able to do the same. It is possible that a non-custodial parent can receive payment from a custodial parent. And there's no reason making more money than the other parent of your child should mean you don't get child support. If both parents decided that they wanted to bring a child into the world they should both pay. Whether one of the parents makes more money than the othe…	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 10:39 AM
1	Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. I agree about marriage happening because two people love one another, but I don't agree with what appears to be your opinion that you have to have children to be a family. Why can't a couple decide that they want to be a legally recognized family even without children? The part about making medical decisions when your spouse is unable to isn't a benefit someone would be getting married for, it's more of a recognition that if this is the person you love enough to marry, then you trust them to mak…	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 10:17 AM
1	Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. Child support is determined based on who has a higher income, not who has a penis. And child support isn't dependent on divorce. If the child was unplanned and conceived out of wedlock a non-custodial parent still has to pay, and the amount is still based on income. Of course there are some cases where a parent ends up having to pay an unfair amount because of strange definitions or loopholes, but that happens in just about every situation imaginable because nothing is perfect. Also, I don't kno…	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 10:06 AM
1	Just how corrosive is feminism? How feminism undermines marriage. On your opinion of marriage being only for having kids, what about the other benefits of marriage? Like being able to visit your spouse in the hospital, being the person who makes decisions for your spouse if they are in a coma etc, and inheriting your spouse's possessions should the worst happen. Should people only be able to get these benefits if they also want to have children?	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 09:57 AM
2	One step at a time.. I don't understand why one of you would be punished but the other wouldn't be, that doesn't really seem like equality.	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 09:40 AM
11	Maybe someone here would be willing to explain this without immediately dismissing me. A better question would be why don't companies give men paid paternity leave so they can bond with/care for their newborns as well. If the leave was split between the mother and the father it would help remove some of the woman at home, man in the workplace bias and probably produce a generation of children which bond more equally with their parents rather than seeing the mom as the loving and caring one and not really knowing their dad because he never takes time off when their sick or to take …	/r/MensRights	14/08/12 09:30 AM
1	Are women paid less than men??? [Discussion] While that's a valid point, it's also because men who stay home/take time off while their wives work to spend time taking care of kids are looked down upon and women who don't do this are also looked down upon.	/r/MensRights	06/07/12 03:43 AM
0	Are women paid less than men??? [Discussion] I don't think pharmacists or physicians and surgeons is very broad. Also there are several points for different kinds of management and many of these positions require no form of higher education.	/r/MensRights	06/07/12 03:31 AM
5	Obamacare strikes again - DV protection for women, not for men. This is just the beginning. Women's health programs are sometimes necessary because a lot of research in health problems that affect both men and women have less information on women. For instance, only recently was it discovered that women have different symptoms and signs when having heart attacks.	/r/MensRights	06/07/12 03:10 AM