TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

foxyramirez Archive

View 0 posts and 448 comments by foxyramirez on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

"Clearly you've never met a 14 year old Saudi boy" ~ Casual racism to justify pedophilia. Classy.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 06:32 AM
3

That doesn't sound right. The library glitter demon said everybody is the same tho.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 06:47 PM
1

Could be the thinner skull wall, or maybe the simple lack of bone density? Hmmmmmmmmm
/r/MensRights17/12/21 06:37 PM
3

That would seem to indicate that women are physically weaker than men though. Do feminists really want to make that point?
/r/MensRights17/12/21 03:24 PM
6

"That's a good idea honey, men are better at cooking after all." - a wise man that never cooked a day in his life. These types of people are always looking for a reason to be mad, nothing wrong with turning it into something productive.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:59 PM
1

Yeah? And exactly how common among high society types is multiple fathers?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:22 PM
1

If your saying 2015, that'd be towards the beginning of their relationship, yeah.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:18 PM
2

His name is Travis Brown, and he fights in the heavy weight division. This is the two of them. No, ordinarily you'd be right, but MMA is different and the way fighters communicate with each other is different. As you can see by the size difference, she isn't beating up on a defenseless man, and further, they spar with each other often. They've been happily married since 2017, with no charges, civil suits, or pattern of abuse in sight. You're highlighting two extraordinary people in rare situatio…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:07 PM
-1

I think the nature of the relationship between two MMA fighters is probably a little different than your framing it up to be. Contextually, the both of them spend most of every year in the gym also getting beat up. I dunno, if it were me, I'd rather take a beating from Rhonda than a lot of the potential alternative negative outcomes. Imagine if she just aired that shit out on TV instead. He'd lose his contacts with the UFC and everything.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:39 AM
4

Not counting any of the girls with Saiyan blood maybe. Her new baby probably has a higher power level than she does. That said, she certainly is the most bold.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 01:17 AM
1

Bud, there isn't a black activist out there that won't tell you the black man must stand on his own, from Malcolm X to Larry Elder. I think the last administration proved what a modern conservative can do for the average person, and this current administration is quite the contrast to that experience.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:41 PM
2

Then you should understand that you're close minded by making that connection on your own. You don't seem to understand what all the conservatives in the room do; crime is linked to poverty and it's hugely offensive for liberals like Hillary or Biden to spend decades crafting the welfare incentive system that enslaved the black man in the chains of generational poverty, cyclical crime and single parenthood to then come out to say "oh they're just born animals". Liberal ideology today exists to p…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 02:46 PM
4

Meh, I'd attribute it to New York itself. The whole place stinks, top to bottom.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 10:22 AM
3

Well, the pamphlet did have a red line crossing through the words "And Men's", but the printer ran out of ink and nobody in the office knew how to change the ink cart. The patriarchy strikes again.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 06:20 PM
8

How is fatness not a clear sign of poor self-confidence and impulse control? Very few people actually have hormonal conditions predating their obesity.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 12:36 PM
23

Yup, I call it the lowest ethical common denominator or race to the bottom ethics. The content of the message ultimately comes out as "I see people do bad things and want to also do these bad things".
/r/MensRights16/10/21 12:23 PM
1

Oh for sure, I'm not arguing that you can't have a higher quality life childless than you can with children. It's merely that research shows that the biological incentive to survive for the protection and rearing of children runs very deeply, evolutionarily speaking, and so does the incentive to breed. You are more likely to live a shorter life without children, simply because you can't control the nature of your inherent biology. Your body will take you out of the survival competition if you ar…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 07:35 PM
0

Biologically, in the wild we rarely make it past a certain age, but menopause basically seals the deal with the rapid depletion of bone density, and as you mentioned, attractiveness also plays a big part. Beyond that, without medical aid, childbirth has a pretty chilling fatality rate, cutting down further those that would otherwise live to longer ages. This effect is basically rendered inert with modern technology. Further, this effect happens in general among both parents; couples with (grand)…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 07:29 PM
-3

Human love changes chemically throughout a relationship. The lust phase was never intended to last because it gives way to a nurture phase evolved for child rearing. This happens about 4 to 7 years in, but can happen even earlier. Sad fact is, women are genetically engineered to have a few kids and then die after raising them in order to reduce competition with their young. We can escape our environment, but we can't escape our biology.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 11:44 AM
1

I'm gonna guess she is you're average basic white girl. I can't help but think you're her "I have a black friend" and an outlet for her psychological frustrations.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:12 PM
2

Certainly not, but it could also be said that gender isn't a deciding factor in how laws are made. I was also keen to utilize the word "vicariously"; we have a representative democracy. What can be said, at least by the statistics presented by the university of Texas, is that the majority of voters are women, and that these women voted for representatives that ideologically believe in abortion bans. While women didn't directly vote for an abortion ban, I don't think we can rule out that the inte…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 01:47 AM
6

Literally every single Republican female rep. I think you'd do better to point out that it was decided entirely along party lines and that gender really didn't play into it at all one way or the other. That said, the majority of Texas voters are indeed women, by 2%. If but vicariously, women did vote for this. I doubt there was ever a single Texas Republican in that lineup that ever said they'd vote against an abortion ban. I think Texans were aware of the type of representatives they were votin…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:55 PM
5

Yeah, I get the distinct feeling he's probably a youngster. The best we can do is demonstrate their error and lead through example.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 04:17 PM
10

Are you smarter than Trump?
/r/MensRights13/09/21 11:51 AM
39

He was literally born into wealth. What's the point of pretending to be this stupid dude?
/r/MensRights13/09/21 11:46 AM
2

You do realize it's still common practice to clip short long clits on babies? It's done under the same premise as mgm, normalization of the genitals.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:03 PM
1

An entirely unique human cell is created upon inception, and immediately begins cellular division. That isn't a personal belief, it's a well known and scientifically establish biological process. You're confusing this with the argument for consciousness and sentience, which I am not making. Sentience is not a bar for life. Neither is size, density, weight, or development.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 05:41 PM
0

Could use more paragraph breaking, but otherwise, you are spot on the money, and wonderfully articulate I might add.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 12:50 PM
1

Yeah, I stopped reading half-way. You pick a vile way to make your points and I can't bring myself to even entertain the text you put to my monitor by reading their insults. You are very clearly unable to debate with the integrity enough not to insult your opponent. You invalidate your own arguments thusly. To put it uncouthly, you are simply too uncivilized to have this conversation with. I hope for the sake of your own integrity, you learn to overcome this disability.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:25 PM
1

Seems like you're the one raging here bud. You're leaning hard on character attack without ever having once demonstrated a proper reason why a fetus doesn't constitute life. To quote a great man, "If single cell bacteria on the surface of Mars constitutes life..." you have a Hell of a bar to leap over. To prove your point, you must demonstrate why a fetus isn't a living being composed of living cells and you must demonstrate the moral reasoning behind the elimination of a device or being, whiche…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:17 PM
0

Let's talk about the definition of what constitutes "living" in scientific terms. Even a single human cell technically fits the description of living, it can perform mitosis, it has a multiple cellular organs such as the nuclei, or a mitochondria for processing its own food. You argue that a fetus is akin to a parasite, but seem to have blanked out the fact that even parasites are considered living. And further, I find it insulting that you'd attack my intelligence on the subject of biology, I g…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:54 PM
1

Are you implying that it's okay to murder anything that isn't self-aware?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 05:46 PM
1

No, I believe our right to life and liberty is among our highest laws to be respected. New life is created at the point that a new human cell is created. That new life has a legal right to live. We don't measure the value of life by the number of cells, the level of consciousness, or age. Answer these simple questions: After the sperm meets the egg, what sort of cells are produced? Do those cells meet the scientific definition of living? Are they American human cells? Are they unique from their …
/r/MensRights02/09/21 05:42 PM
5

I can only speak for the American laws that grant the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness explicitly.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:13 PM
3

That's how you're looking to frame it up, but I went on to elaborate that I think women have a right to ensure chemically that a zygote doesn't establish itself. That's how some contraceptives work. My problem starts when you wait till the fetus is established enough to warrant surgical abortion. In my mind, the dissection of a living human being can be construed as no less than murder. Though, I'd argue in the positive for government provided contraceptives and birth control. Let Medicare cover…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:12 PM
-1

Eh, only insomuch as the same thought experiment applies to utilitarianism. That whole "should a doctor chop up one healthy person to save five people about to die" is a well worn schtick, to be sure. However, I wasn't arguing the case of frozen embryos, I was arguing the case of established fetuses. The correct comparison would actually be, if I had to choose between saving a five year old or a hundred pregnant women, and in that case, my choice would be obvious, and invalidates your argument e…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:46 PM
6

The moment the sperm meets the egg, new life, new human life, is created. It is just a start, but new life none the less. Personally, I'm of the mind that women ought have the right to control the chemical environment of their body, and in thus, have quite a wide birth of options available to prevent a pregnancy even after sex, long before a zygote establishes itself. I find surgical abortions barbaric and inhumane, with abortion surgeons capable of each testifying to a fetus' attempts to fight …
/r/MensRights02/09/21 12:19 PM
34

I think it's more complicated than that. You are guaranteed the right to life and liberty, and scientifically, new life is created at inception. On the scales of justice you must weigh women's bodily autonomy versus a newly created American's right to live. And then if you cross that threshold and we've determined that legally, a fetus isn't a person but rather, property, I must ask, to what degree is that property co-owned? Why shouldn't men have shared control of property they helped build? If…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:44 AM
10

Look, I advocate that women should have the same long prison terms men face all the time. It's shameful they don't get to die, forced into armed conflicts against their will or have to sacrifice their lives first in any emergency situation. It's a deep injustice to women, that they're denied proper rehabilitation by the government when they fail to convict them for crimes they have double the conviction rates in men for. And don't even get me started on social expectations. Women are non-stop de…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:00 AM
29

False flag operations conducted by the feminists themselves. Ask the mod team of any sub feminists oppose. False flags are standard operating procedure for lefties online universally.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:46 AM
3

Got any idea how many pregnancies you get on a modern navy vessel annually? We spend a startling amount of tax dollars training people whom at any point can take paid leave by propping their ankles up behind their head. In order for a women's draft to be possible logistically, you'd need to mandate forced birth control that remains effective throughout an entire deployment cycle.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 10:09 AM
4

They trying to bring back the ol' Dre.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 07:09 PM
20

If you think testifying to a couple cops in a closed room is humiliating, the court room is going to be far less pleasant. I think you'll have to prove a more direct relationship of the persecution of people known to have made false testimony and how that reduces the likelihood of true cases coming forward. They don't need to break open a lie, it's already open. They just need to get more details from her and perhaps some physical evidence, like a journal.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 01:56 AM
10

So you do understand the concept? I mean, it seems like an implicit respect for your partner that should be able to go unsaid. Further, while relationships should be equal, they don't necessarily have to be equitable, and usually aren't. The traditional division of family labor is still just as viable as the modern incarnation, which I should note, harbors far higher rates of divorce.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 04:52 AM
15

You're purposefully flying off the handles here. Dudes don't want their girls advertising their bodies like they're still available. How about I construct an argument in which I frame up women as controlling because they don't want their men taking Friday nights at the bar or strip club? Surely under your logic, you'd agree.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 03:26 AM
4

The current communist strategy is Lennon's class warfare technique, modified to divide people by race, rather than class. I don't really see how you could separate socialism from some form of structural social division, the ideology necessitates the existence of an oppressor and oppressed class to even get off the ground floor.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 11:42 AM
1

The perception of one's own self is inevitably crafted from your perceptions of your own standing in your respective social hierarchy. What you perceive isn't determined by genetics, how and to what limits you can perceive a thing or concept is. Seriously, if you want to debate about this subject, you should actually get into the material. The biology of gender has been settled for a long time now, and there's a good reason this whole new gender debate rose out of the social sciences and not the…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 11:36 PM
1

Actually, the correct term to use academically would be dysphoric, and he was indeed dysphoric, but because he was forced into a transition because of a botched circumcision. The only requirement for gender dysphoria is for your psychological gender and biological gender out of sync. And you'd consider this effect to be a medical condition, not a totally different gender. People have to resort to transition therapy because (doctors should be doing this, not all do, because this industry is huge)…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 11:29 PM
3

What you need to clarify in order to be right is how "self-view" is biological in nature. You really shot yourself in the foot by claiming it's not possible to measure it, because that puts it firmly outside the realm of biological possibility. I think you're arguing philosophy against biology here, and you're making a lot of mistakes in so doing. I can go through and quote you in this thread how many times you've argued that gender is nurtured, particularly in your argument in what defines a wo…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 12:53 PM
4

I'm arguing that gender is purely a nature thing. You are born with genetics that guide chemical reactions in your body, regardless of your mental or cultural states, you are irrevocably bound to them. The reason the guy killed himself is because gender isn't a learned behavior, it's baked into your genetics. He had no idea he was genetically male until his psychological breaks were too much to endure for his parents, and they relented. Upon discovering his true gender, he immediately reverted t…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 12:49 PM
4

Well here we have this child that killed himself as a direct result of the attempt to prove your case, that gender is a learned behavior. That isn't even the only case. Consistently, we see that gender, and even gender norms, are natural patterns in research with our chimp relatives; boys and girls naturally assume play styles that emulate their gender roles in adulthood, completely without cultural encouragement. It's more than just belief, we have seen multiple cases that prove this is the tru…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 12:44 PM
5

Self described would fall into the category of learned behavior. That's an expression of your cultural upbringing. In terms of academia, there can only be nature or nurture, genetic or learned. Obviously there's no way to measure "self-view", that term in of itself is a social construct. It has no bearing to biological reality. If you desperately need a blood transfusion, they aren't gonna ask you "what's your self view" to save your life from a mis-transfusion, there exists no way to measure "s…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 12:23 PM
4

So let me get this straight; we believe gender is defined by biology, while you seem to believe gender is defined by stereotypes. Are you aware of the inherent sexism and bigotry in stereotyping? Seems counter intuitive to the very medical necessity that substantiated the need for transition therapy in the first place; a very real biological condition in which your brain dysphorically confuses itself to such an extent that it is psychologically damaging. Culture is a learned (nurture) behavior, …
/r/MensRights17/06/21 12:13 PM
6

Ah prostitution, the one industry that proves feminism is full of shit. Women ought to have the right to do with their body whatever they want insomuch that it doesn't cause harm to others. The true feminist version would include abortion in that statement, I wouldn't, it's murder. In practice though, modern feminists see any celebration of the traditional female form as the evil brainwashing results of the Patriarchy. Never forget though, these people drove August Ames to suicide. They killed t…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:59 PM
12

You kinda have to combine studies on your own to get that total picture, since it seems they classify DV by physicality and reciprocality. Large and by, it seems women are nearly just as physical as men in initial DV, and are far more verbally and mentally abusive, but men are far more likely to respond in kind with physical violence and abuse. At least that's what I've gathered from various studies.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 09:43 AM
29

One would hope. Prevailing statistics show women are overall more abusive.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 08:53 AM
20

Statistically, virgins are more likely to stay in happy and long relationships. They're far less likely to divorce. You call it toxicity, I'd call it making the smarter bet. You have better odds at the casino than you do not getting divorced by the average American woman. Why wouldn't you want to hedge your bets?
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:05 PM
8

The New York City school district is in a heap of shit literally right this moment for a leaked phone call in which the administration admits to a curriculum "designed to make white students feel less than". There is absolutely an anti-white agenda. It's fundamentally necessary to anybody practicing intersectional theory.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 12:42 PM
1

The only person in this entire thread talking about white genocide is you. Who do you think you're arguing with? Seriously dude, lay off the poppers. You're melting your brains.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:51 PM
14

They need a scapegoat for the bait and switch of the welfare state. It's just unbelievable that it's worked this long.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 04:53 AM
–

Actually yeah, so much so that the word "Slave" is literally derived from the people most enslaved, the Slavs. Hand waving away all the white slavery throughout history really only shows how little you know about the subject, and I think shows just how much you care (or rather, don't), insomuch that the subject acts as a soapbox for you to stand on to look and feel good about yourself. Historically speaking, the African slave was only popularized in only the last few hundred years. For all those…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:26 AM
8

Honestly, this in itself should be all the evidence needed to strip Reddit of section 230 protections.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 02:18 AM
3

Imagine getting 400 downvotes and then thinking everybody else must be sexist. We can't speculate that he is guilty of assault, he's been proven innocent. Or I guess you can, but that would make you patently wrong. We can speculate she is guilty of slander and filing false report, and further, through discovery, we can identify the evidence to prove that speculation accurate. However, you are missing the fact that him being proven innocent is the precise reason on why we can speculate slander on…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 01:45 PM
7

Lucky for us, knowing the truth within a legal doubt is good enough. You're making the flying spaghetti monster argument unironically.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 05:48 AM
3

Did they seriously ignore that bit about right wing gay men? As a conservative gay man myself, that statement is wildly fucking offensive. Their isn't a person on earth I love more than myself. Secular conservativism is a thing. Ethics can exist without religion.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 04:07 PM
10

If I remember correctly, instead of forming gangs, women form prison families as an emulation of their home lives, which often includes sexual assault. I remember a girl in an interview saying something to the effect of, "you may not be a lesbian on the outside, but in here, you will be if you want to survive."
/r/MensRights31/01/21 10:42 AM
1

I didn't make any assumptions or statements about you beyond that lil quip about being an armchair psychologist. I assume that you don't literally have a doctorate in armchair psychology. It's not so much what I do for living and more about my personal fields of study. Primarily, development of the human brain, and the history of the evolution of the human brain in conjunction with language and behavior. I studied at Kansas University on a Bright Flight Scholarship after scoring two points above…
/r/MensRights26/12/20 01:48 PM
0

Why'd ya stop halfway there? My point was that we don't need to make the punishment even more severe when nobody is getting convicted for it, thanks to the fact that police conduct investigations through the lens of the Deluth Model. Consider that psychologists show that women are just as violent as men when it comes to Domestic Violence, despite that, men are wholesale charged and convicted at much MUCH higher rates than women are. This is the same for any violent crime. Women are charged less,…
/r/MensRights26/12/20 01:03 PM
0

You wrote all this shit based on a false perception of what I wrote. Let's start here. For one, I come from a family of career cops. I actually know what I'm talking about here. For two, police currently investigate based on a set of rules given to them from the Deluth Model, which automatically assumes men are the perpetuators of violent crime. The methodology of investigation is flawed. This needs to be changed in order to give police the proper ability to investigate without gender bias tilte…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 07:55 PM
0

Time to make you feel like an idiot for this rant. I'm not a woman, I'm a gay dude. I'm arguably way more about men than you are. And further, if you knew anything about how police conduct investigation, you'd know that they're operating on the flawed Deluth model presented by feminism. That's why they automatically believe women. And mind you, I'm not saying "Don't punish women", I'm saying, fucking investigate that shit right the first time through and then charge them for the false report rig…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 07:41 PM
1

Our law investigators practice under the false premises of the Deluth Model. The investigation methodology is flawed from the very beginning. I'd rather a man not have to sit in prison for a false accusation. If accusations are properly investigated, false accusations get dealt with.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 03:46 PM
17

If women were punished for coming clean, then they'd just stick to the lie forever. It's the methodology of police investigation that needs to change. It is essentially flawed in its current state.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 10:14 AM
2

I wonder if it has more to do with anti-occult goth stuff of the 90's and early 2000's than a gender normativity thing.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 09:46 PM
1

I'd love for you to give a reply to my Matriarchy post.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 04:05 PM
2

I suppose it depends on what we're talking about, doesn't it? Men and women aren't biologically identical, or even necessarily programmed on an instinctive level the same. There are notable differences that can express themselves as advantages in modern life. For instance, bell curve data is pretty solid, and it's pretty obvious testosterone offers incredible physical advantages. No, I believe in acknowledging our biological differences and understanding how they express themselves in modern lif…
/r/MensRights30/11/20 07:17 AM
32

Problem I have here is how the lines of equality and biology are blurred. You cite fortune 500 companies for a sign of sexual discrimination, but you're really just drawing that conclusion on your own. It could be that biological imperative makes men far more likely to land in leadership positions that require extreme commitment.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 10:04 PM
19

So what about the sentencing bias? Even after conviction, in similar crimes, women are consistently handed much shorter sentencing terms than men. Beyond that, divorce proceedings and child custody proceedings also show clear female bias. While you're points are valid, there is nothing to say that biased courts can't also exist simultaneous to your points.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 10:59 AM
1

Honestly though, you might send him cards from your kids and family status updates, maybe even family photos. Men like that take a lot of happiness in seeing the results of their work.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:43 PM
5

You better send that judge the best holiday fruit basket ever.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:47 PM
15

Yeah, same court that went after a sperm donor for child support.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:14 AM
11

I forget where I saw the statistic, but I believe there are actually more women involved in child sex trafficking. As I remember it, the explanation is that this statistic is emergent from the desperation of single moms with primary custody; apparently pimping your children is a pretty effective way to finance drug habits.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 09:41 AM
1

Losing a body part isn't any less traumatic just because your genitals are different. You're simply making assumptions. Your don't think he would be affected the same way going to the beach, or hitting the gym? Most physical training activities men go shirtless. Men are extremely aware of their bodies, especially in regards to muscular symmetry. I personally wouldn't be able to practice jujitsu or hit the weight bench with this huge of a scar. Such an asymmetry can just as easily reduce a man's …
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:24 PM
1

If the base requirement is having breast cancer, I don't see why not. Not every woman has the same experience with breast cancer, but that doesn't make them any less or more valid than the other.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 12:46 PM
1

I don't get your point here. Even being the bigger person having a real physical advantage, it only means the more time you're gonna spend in jail for defending yourself.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 05:27 AM
6

Lack of coordination didn't stop her from slicing off Depp's fingertip.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:21 PM
13

You're a sexist piece of shit because you are automatically assuming the issue is directly related to being male. Violence has more to do with being poor than anything else by far. Maybe you should try going into the hood and tell em about their toxic poverty. Maybe they shouldn't live in such toxic neighborhoods or get their education from such toxic schools. Or maybe they shouldn't have been born with such a toxic skin color. You see, when you paint with the broad brush of bigotry, not only ar…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 03:06 PM
8

I assume she's getting a similar sentence for transmitting child porn to a child?
/r/MensRights16/02/20 02:28 PM
2

Because they don't understand the psychological burden of rape. And they assume it to be a hot teacher. Lemme ask you, would you feel the same way if it were a 49 year old fat chick?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:59 PM
0

I'm not pessimistic, but here's a bunch of reasons to be pessimistic. Joking aside, I have to disagree. There's a lot of reasons to be optimistic, especially with Trump in office and libertarian ideals becoming more and more popular. It's pretty obvious the tide is turning hard on SJW bullshit. This election will just be another nail for the coffin for intersectional theory.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:25 AM
6

I think that's kind of the point dude. Young boys aren't thinking with their brains, they're thinking with their dicks. It's a very clear case of an adult taking advantage of a vulnerable minor.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:49 AM
6

Don't be so pessimistic, nobody said the battle for civil liberty was an easy one.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:31 PM
1

I forget where I saw the statistic, so you'd have to hunt it down, but I'm pretty sure women are as a whole, more likely than men to be abusive and neglectful, even after adjusting for the courtroom tilt. The one that has me curious is if full time custody or primary custody parents are more neglectful and abusive than equal custody parents.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 05:21 PM
1

Dude, it's worse than that. There's a trend now where you label gays and lesbians as transphobes if they aren't willing to fuck pre-op trans people.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:20 PM
38

At least not until he has a good role for a female lead.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 05:40 AM
52

I forget where to find the statistic, but yeah, rape fantasy is pretty far up there for a large quantity of women.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 04:10 AM
3

Dude, it's the land of milk and honey, you just gotta suck some dick and take it in the ass every now and again. All things considered, it's a better deal than the ladies will give ya. Lulz.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:45 PM
9

Gay man here, can confirm. My boyfriend and I are barely thirty (he's still in his twenties) and we got the house paid off, about finished paying off the new car, and we're looking at a truck now too. We got a bunch of gaming consoles hooked up our big entertainment system, and about six thousand dollars worth of gaming pc's. We have friends over sometimes, and since I like to do custom pc building on the side, it's nice to have a couple extra builds laying around the house.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:27 PM
6

Not to mention, men are far more likely to be working a physically demanding job, often exposed directly to the elements.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 05:53 PM
5

You just press enter twice. Works just fine for me and I'm using the baconreader mobile app
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:51 AM
27

Bro, paragraph breaks are a thing.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 09:20 PM
4

The issue with giving hormones during developmental years is a biological one. Your body develops the way it's programmed to with hormones as one of the active ingredients. When you play with that, you not only invite mutation, but also cancer. Even in adults, steroid therapies can invite cancer. This risk is exasperated by the developmental process into adulthood. Not to mention, our emphasis should be on psychological therapy. In cases of limb or body dysphoria, we don't solve the issue by rem…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:49 PM
44

That sounds fucking awful. Sleep is probably my most cherished vice.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 01:29 AM
8

I kinda feel like if you're banging Florida man, you already ought to know what you've signed up for.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:47 PM
1

Yeah, I know there's a few that have, but this far, every single time they've either caved when challenged or ate shit. If they do that, it's as if saying "men, collect your free paycheck here." If you see a place like that, apply, then just get em to admit to their bigotry on paper or in front of a camera. Boom, easy money.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 11:42 PM
1

I just don't see it being all that widespread. You're gonna have a hard time finding an industry listing like that without a specific reason.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 02:36 PM
-8

Those are parameters set by the equal opportunity act, and they aren't enforced if those races or sexes don't apply. And let's be honest, for its failings, it's far more successful in its goals.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 01:56 PM
33

The equal opportunity hiring act does actually protect you from this kind of discrimination. Employers cannot discriminate based on gender, race, religion, or disability. If you file your resume to that company in America and they don't hire you on basis of gender, they're liable to be sued, as well as face criminal fines.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 01:40 PM
1

On the third month, you're supposed to be taking the suppository and the oral, at the same time if possible.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 12:58 PM
7

It's reading stuff like this that makes me feel like being gay is a cheat code for life. I'd give my boyfriend so much shit if he wasn't working.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 11:14 AM
52

I don't think the issue is that child support exists so much as it is that a tilted court are the ones with the power to give it.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 11:46 AM
1

What happens at the gym, stays at the gym. Lulz
/r/MensRights10/08/19 09:35 PM
6

Ladies, there's only two things you gotta do to keep your man happy; feed em and fuck em. If you can't handle these two simple things, don't ever forget there's a gay bro like me just around the corner ready to shark your man.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 08:07 PM
1

Eh, maybe for casuals or passive fans. There isn't a hardcore fan I know of that doesn't love the women's fights. Their flexibility adds a totally different dynamic to the ground game, and because women lack ko power, you tend to see more technical fights. Today, women's matches almost always make it to main card, and often enough they're either the main or co-main event. I know most women's sports are bullshit, but mma ain't one of em. The men and women of the UFC cross train against each other…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 02:29 PM
3

Except for maybe the women's division in the UFC. Nunez is this close to being the first fighter to simultaneously hold 3 belts. And she's straight stomped every legend she can find on her way there. I mean, she koed Chris Cyborg in the first round. She's a truly rare spectacle of a fighter. In fact, sometimes women's division fights can be more popular than the men's division head liners. Rhonda famously crushed a feminist that asked her about her pay rate. She said something to the effect of "…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 08:47 PM
1

I think this says more about Queensland than it does about the position of the law.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 11:41 AM
2

At least he's transparent with his intentions I guess. Lulz. Jesus that user name
/r/MensRights20/06/19 11:40 AM
99

On the other hand, let's not forget statutory rape laws exist because children lack the mental capacity to understand the full implications of their consent.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:33 PM
1

Nah, I want you not to kill the unborn. There's a stark difference. Over one million of the unborn denied their right to live per year. If it were any other metric of people, you'd call that a genocide.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:05 PM
1

Like I said, all men's parental rights end at ejaculation. Or did you miss that whole first paragraph? The second paragraph covers health. We have fewer rights in both regards than women.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 01:10 PM
1

And, to add for flavor to one of your more offensive points. If you wanna talk about risk, how about we talk about the fact that all men's paternal rights end at ejaculation? Can you imagine dealing with the risk of being at the whims of another human being and a biased government, financially enslaved for 18 years, coupled with the psychological torture of being denied access to your children? You can't even fathom the risks men take daily. We're the number one victim of nearly every violent cr…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:54 PM
4

Once again, vile assumptions. No, I believe we're all equal and we ought to have our laws reflect that. The moment you create life, regardless of that you're growing them inside you, that growing person has a fundamental right to life. You have no right to kill that person until it is the only option for your survival. And no, we live in the age of science. According to the journal of obstetrics and gynecology, since the 1900's, we've reduced the maternal mortality rate by nearly 99%. We've near…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:34 AM
3

Did you seriously just defend abortion and the right to life of a tape worm in the same post? It's like you know my argument is right, especially by your own "defend all life" metric, but you've placed women above all moral responsibility. I'm not going to waste time countering your points that simply make assumptions about my character. I could be space Hitler or mega Jesus, doesn't really matter who I am. My point still stands true. The only time you ought have right to kill another human bein…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 11:17 AM
3

Humans aren't parasites. Every human being has an intrinsic right to life. You don't get execute a person because they're inconvenient for you. And at the point of conception, new DNA form is created. New life is created. New life that you ought not be the judge, jury, and executioner for. Simple fix: If you don't want to have kids, get your tubes tied. /s Edit: kinda says a lot about your mindset that you can compare people to tape worms.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:57 AM
5

Frankly, women don't "own" what's growing in their body either. People aren't property.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:36 AM
2

Let's face it, this franchise was dead after the first sequel.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 06:36 PM
15

Dude, scroll through this sub just a little bit. You don't have to go far too see how intricately tied leftists are to identity politics and social justice. The top front runner of the Democrat party is a socialist, which fundamentally depends on identity politics to form its essential ideas. Men's rights will always be a second hand citizen to feminist ideology in the liberal sphere, and I can prove it. I challenge you to post a men's rights topic of your choice on r/Democrat or r/liberal. Your…
/r/MensRights10/06/19 03:26 PM
18

I did nothing more than state a fact. You won't find Republicans instituting such things like requiring men in college to take a class on how not to rape. The rhetoric men's rights fights against largely comes from the left. I don't like it anymore than you do, it's the reason I left the Democrat party in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 02:47 PM
15

There's an awful lot of overlap on that venn diagram. That, and left wing politics are fused at the hip to social justice identity politics. Currently, the ideology of the left is at odds against men's rights. It's only natural that people here tend to be right leaning, as the left regard men as little more than inherently violent monkey people with an uncontrollable urge to rape anything with a pulse.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 02:03 PM
1

That's a pretty bold assumption on companies. It's against the law to discriminate on employees specifically for race. And if a company did have an anti-minority sentiment on the books, you'd think a lot of people would stop going there. My problem is when affirmative action tries to force non-sensical hiring policies and/or force employers to diverge from merit based hiring.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 12:02 PM
0

Every job that presents an inherently dangerous or risky atmosphere is dominated by men. Equal diversity is the idea that all groups should be equally represented or as close as possible thereto.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 06:31 PM
3

I feel like I didn't address your second point very much. I think your second point could be applicable if this wasn't the standard fare for every dangerous job. The whole idea of equal diversity is hugely flawed. Men are biologically wired to take more risks and to defend their group. Men, due to the aspects of biology, are simply more disposable. They also must take risks to prove their value to women. All of which are intricate parts to our very complicated mating patterns. Because of this, m…
/r/MensRights09/06/19 04:10 PM
19

One of the basic requirements for completion of the EMT training course involves carrying a big human shaped, heavy as fuck sand bag through a simulated rescue while in full gear. Basically, you have to be able to carry an average sized man while in full gear down flights of stairs. There simply isn't a lot of women on earth that can lift two hundred pounds of human meat onto their shoulders while wearing over fifty pounds of gear. To give you an example, in New York city, they tried an initiati…
/r/MensRights09/06/19 01:19 PM
0

I think your getting downvotes because you're attributing an individually variable trait with the broad brush of generalization. You can be a perfectly good cook and still work 40 to 60 hours a week.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:16 PM
12

It can be if you bring a camera.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:45 PM
20

Women can be vicious, luckily you got gay bros like myself that are happy to offer a shoulder to cry on. ;) Come on, let's go to the gym, buddy.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:33 PM
15

Yeah, better make sure there's a camera nearby, because that much witness testimony won't look good for ya.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:37 PM
3

You just gotta find the right kind of girl that loves you for the money.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:28 PM
34

The kid is 14 with raging hormones. He's not even close to being a man. He probably still has a chest full of Legos and action figures at the foot of his bed. It's simply unfathomable. She should be buried.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 12:59 PM
3

Nah, he's right. Ghost Rider suffers from the same trouble heroes like the Incredible Hulk have; they can't hold down a solo movie worth a shit but damn are they cool in a team. But they are gonna give the minor heroes their own spotlight with the Disney streaming service in 2020. That's why they killed the Netflix hero series. The Netflix series was done by Marvel comics, whereas the Disney shows are produced by Marvel studios. So they'll be coming into the MCU finally!
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:56 PM
25

As the saying goes, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 11:39 AM
4

They also used to sterilize retards, so I guess we're both getting castrated, huh?
/r/MensRights28/03/19 02:00 PM
5

All I'm getting out of that is that kids should have male and female familial figures in their lives. He goes on to talk about how grandparents often fill those voids, as can other relatives or family figures. And my problem is that you derive a bigoted message from this. It's plain science that's been displayed on this sub plenty of times. Children from specifically fatherless homes are twice as like or worse to commit crime, use drugs, develope mental disease, etc. Data can't be bigoted. It's …
/r/MensRights11/03/19 12:35 AM
4

It's all over his Twitter. He even goes to specifically address that children without father figures in the black community is a massive issues leading to bad outcomes. There must be something wrong with your world view to assume bigotry as the default when only a little digging would prove to you otherwise.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 12:08 AM
2

No no, what you've done is a gross misrepresentation. He said the contrary.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 11:35 PM
8

Sure, other research has it that male suicide rates being high is a result of many of the prejudices men face in daily life. We're also regularly disposed of and forgotten about after military service where make suicide rates are extremely high. To make matters worse, in America, you can count the number of men's shelters on one hand. I'm sure Australia is much the same. In fact, standard procedure for domestic abuse help lines is to assume all men are abusers. They almost universally have no tr…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:35 PM
13

It also cracks me up when these fat acceptance people get up on the stage and go on a rant about how they're healthy at any weight. Ten minutes in, they're huffing and sweating from standing up too long and the exertion of holding a microphone up to their face is just too much.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 05:34 PM
1

And referencing back to those overcrowded California prisons. Here's a picture of where they keep general population. I'd never be able to sleep, fucking ever.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:26 PM
5

It should be a sex crime on the same caliber as rape.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:12 PM
2

I'm speaking from the experience of my friend. He did some time and had told me multiple times that he'd rather be in the pin than do time in county. There are no programs, anything to do but watch TV and play cards, you may not even go outside depending on the county. The real benefit though, is the ridiculously short sentence. It's not very much of a relief to know that the one year she does get is gonna suck balls.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:06 PM
1

The murders and rapists sit in a cell for 23 hours a day and only come out for 1 hour for some r&r in a cage no bigger than a couple times the size of their cell. Unless you're talking about one of those overcrowded California prisons. That shit is super fucking scary.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 10:35 PM
2

I assumed it was the natural conclusion that the sentencing is ridiculous. To accurately put the parlance, it goes without saying.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:05 PM
2

You're putting words in my mouth. I never said any of that. I ONLY stated that a year in county is worse than a year in prison. It is literally the first sentence. I made no claim that it was a proper sentence. You assumed it. I only made the statement because I know it to be true from second hand accounts. My best friend is an ex-con and stated to me multiple times he'd rather be in prison than dumped in county because county is underfunded and sucks balls for long term stays.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 02:53 PM
6

You misunderstand. 1 year in county is worse than 1 year in prison. I'm not arguing against that she should have had heavier sentencing.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 02:43 PM
0

Honestly a year in county is worse than a year in prison precisely because you have so many folks going in and out. Most violent crimes committed are misdemeanors. You got drunks and druggies still rolling hard when they throw em in the public cell with ya too. Basically county is shit for a long term stay. Prison offers a more scheduled and predictable stay. You never know in county if they're going to throw in some psychopath with ya and the guests change day to day. Edit: seeing as the witch …
/r/MensRights10/02/19 01:51 PM
-5

Naturally so. Mental illness as a contributing factor to crime gives the judge reason to set factors for release involving treating those factors as terms for early release or something though. There's nothing wrong with that just so long as it applies to everybody equally.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 09:04 PM
-10

If anything, it's a reason not to throw the maximum sentence at her and maybe make available certain programs in prison for her though.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:58 PM
-16

I hate Reddit's propensity to downvote uncomfortable facts. You don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:58 PM
10

It would have been ironic if the point was that men are underpaid in fashion.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 02:11 PM
9

They done goofed up.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:02 AM
12

It's at 140k dislikes and rising. It's at a ten to one ratio to boot.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:01 AM
2

Seems like she was put on probation for drug dealing. Not sure how much of a career she's going to have even after they restore her license.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:04 PM
7

Gamers couldn't care less about girls picking up a controller. I imagine most gamers even want more girls online so they can flirt with them in a social setting they're comfortable with. Beyond that, there are plenty of female characters in games that regularly get the spotlight. Tomb Raider for instance, is a franchise that has lived decades without changing the equation. Fact is, a bunch of irreverent asshole SJW in EA decided they were gonna give this game the woke treatment and threw it in g…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:44 AM
6

I think it's more appropriate to judge somebody for their character, rather than their sexuality. The couple weren't even the ones that filed, it was the state as prescribed by state regulation.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 07:11 PM
5

"unknown security guard" As if every prison ever doesn't keep logs of who is going to be doing what, when and where. What a load.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 12:19 PM
2

Dude, you have a hard time using proper grammar to put together a sentence. You have no real credentials, so stop pretending like you do. I'd say we weigh the arguments on their merits, but you haven't made any argument at all. You've just vaguely hinted at some ephemeral bullshit rhetoric about how it might be okayish to give hormone pills to kids of all ages because so and so loaded study says it made five hand picked trans students feel good about themselves. As if it had any relevance to the…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 12:44 PM
2

I think you and I both know your opinion is the one considered poorly in this sub. That's why you waited for our little argument to go deep enough that the general population won't see you try to bury me in your classless judgemental bullshit. I've seen you floating around in subs like this trolling your terrible opinions about, farming your negative karma. I've bumped heads with you before, and both times you've descended into barbarism and degeneracy. And anybody who's been on these subs long …
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:27 PM
2

You've done quite the mental gymnastics to conflate my caution to use less invasive treatment with the distrust of the entire academic field. I said I'd distrust certain doctors, not all of them, and I gave specific scenario in which I would be wary. Perhaps you're the one projecting. Indeed, I have no time to try and argue stupidly with somebody about credentials on a social media platform, as if I needed a degree to get in the front door. It's clear that you struggle with arguing the merits of…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 11:03 PM
2

So you resort to character assassination when faced with an opinion you can't oppose with the bullshit rhetoric you're pushing? Not all that surprising. Unfortunately, that's such a used up-go to for thugs like yourself that it's become the clearest red flag on reddit for bullshit opinions. I presume we're done here.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 07:18 PM
2

I speak that way about the profession because I personally know of professors pushing ideology masked as science fact throughout the academic area of Kansas city. At KU, they used to teach the standard model of nature + nurture, now they only teach that humans are purely a blank slate that you can program gender into. This is happening throughout academia, and it's especially dangerous because it's being applied to the medical field where facts matter. The people that directly deal with the medi…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 03:48 PM
2

medical professionals without a moral or religious axe to grind... Therein lies my problem. Feminism and the social justice movement is an ideology that has completely infiltrated many academic spheres, including child psychology. It's a massive movement actively pushing its ideology, pretending it's science fact. And I couldn't disagree more with you. Doctors are just as infallible as everybody else. Doctors do, in fact, just dull out drugs. The worst drug epidemic in the history of America is …
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:50 PM
1

Here's a video about a few cases. There's a certain percentage that's hard to pin down of the high suicide rate among transgendered being those that experienced hormonal regret in losing their previous gender. You have to understand, this is the frontier of gender psychology. There's very little actually understood on the topic of gender and mental illness. It's made worse by the ideological muddying the research that needs to be done with accuracy. It can be very dangerous, both psychologically…
/r/MensRights30/11/18 12:48 AM
1

Ultimately, I think therapy should be the go to. Gender dysphoria isn't cured exclusively via gender transition. Children go through phases and will explore their sexuality and gender to figure out where they stand. Beyond that, transitions early in life often can earn medical conditions, such as bone density issues, adolescent growth issues, not growing enough dick meat for the doctor to build a reasonable vagina, and brain development issues (the brain doesn't fully reach the adult phase until…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:34 PM
5

Therapy. Clearly therapy. You certainly don't need to put a target on your kids back.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 06:03 AM
5

A child can't consent to sex, how could they possibly even begin to consent to change their sex?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 01:36 PM
10

Whether or not women believe they can do physical labor at the same rate as men, they can't. Maybe they're getting paid badly because they're bad at work and only exist in those positions because of diversity laws. And as far as Europe and the UK goes, maybe it wasn't a bright idea to import a massive, untrained labor force willing to work for peanuts that undercuts the wages of at risk minority groups.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 04:43 PM
1

That kinda proves my point, doesn't it? You should always ask for your lawyer during questioning and never say a fucking thing until they show up. Don't sign anything, don't do shit at all. That said, it isn't that uncommon for cops to try and pressure people into signing pre written statements. It's far more common in violent crimes than this sort of thing. But really, if they want to charge you, let em take you to court. And I'm not suggesting that she's lying. I'm saying she probably fucked u…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 01:58 AM
0

That's the point of being tried by a jury of your peers. If the evidence is wrong, the justice system ought to sort it out correctly. Do you have any statistics showing the number of people wrongly convicted in these cases? I'm curious of how many times this actually happens per year.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 12:46 AM
3

How could the DA not be involved? That sounds super bogus.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:19 PM
6

If the DA thinks they have enough to proceed, then clearly they have some kind of evidence. In order to charge somebody for false filing, you usually have to show motive and intention. If they got that, plus if her testimonies to the police lack consistency, she's probably SOL. It's pretty rare that people get nailed for false charging rape claims and the DA most assuredly knows that those type of charges are especially a hard sell. Basically, if they're charging her, it's because this is a slam…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 03:59 PM
20

You'd think if foreskin served no real purpose we'd have evolved it away by now. Now you might argue that evolution doesn't happen that quickly, however, just as we know for fact that folks were, on average shorter than us today, we also know they had smaller dicks. As it turns out, among primates, we have the largest dick to body size ratio because we've gone out of our way to evolve that feature. Maybe, just maybe, circumcision has way more to do with a 2000+ year old creepy Jewish God's obses…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 03:01 PM
1

Yeah, but by the same token, I was averaging $20/hr delivering pizza, and I didn't need 4 years of college debt to get that pay grade. You can achieve a high pay grade without stacking tons of debt. And for the cost of college debt and the basic requirements for a job in education, you could instead go into engineering or a similar field that pays a lot better. Beyond that, I think the work cycle appeals more to women because it works well for those that want to have a family and a work life.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 04:04 PM
2

I know a lot of folks here want to point the finger at a grand feminist conspiracy theory, but could it be that there are fewer men in education because it is not a decent job? If you can make the same wages as a manager at Burger King or putting up dry wall, wouldn't you rather deal with dry wall over the insanity of the education system? I think what we see in the education system is more a result of personal choice, over anything else. You don't go into education for the pay, and pay is the m…
/r/MensRights07/11/18 02:02 PM
8

I think it's important to note that this is Russia, where they take acting crazy to a whole new level.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 01:00 PM
1

It's not "rare". Women are the primary instigators of non-reciprocal violence. In fact, lesbians have the highest rates of domestic violence. You're just operating off of pure observation. You clearly don't know the facts. The video was an experiment in seeing how society deals with domestic violence when it's atypical. It turns out, they're just as stupidly dismissive as you are, despite the fact that it's every bit as psychologically damaging to men as it is to women. Statistics are pretty cle…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 03:29 AM
10

With all the research we have on the psychological effects of verbal and physical abuse, and your answer is "well why don't they just punch them?" You're so fucking ignorant, I'm bewildered that you had vocabulary to put together a complete thought. It's insulting to all victims of domestic violence. I mean, don't most women have access to cars? Aren't cars bigger and stronger than men? Why don't they just run them over? Men can't even do any damage to cars, they aren't even a threat. You see ho…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 02:28 PM
6

The Russians aren't only supporting Republicans. They have liberal bots too. Problem is, the liberal narrative echo chamber excommunicates anybody that steps out of line or questions the narrative by default, so it's impossible to tell a Russian shill from a real liberal without risking your own reputation among liberals.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 02:35 PM
3

So if I happen to be standing in the back of one of your YouTube videos, or maybe you just interview me at a rally or something, I should be entitled to your income?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:17 PM
9

I think the distinction to make is in effective institutional power. The biggest organization in regards to that would be the church, and it's not entirely a conservative institution. I think it might be fair to say they probably also have power in certain industries. Feminism is in a unique position right now though. It's figured out how to weaponize its philosophy to cow entire industries. Gamergate is famous for its effects on polarizing the community, and that's spilled into comics, movies, …
/r/MensRights14/10/18 04:45 PM
20

Problem is, what kind of feminist are you? The bad, crazy, and outright hateful feminists enjoy the umbrella of protection folks like yourself give em. They get to participate in feminism and push their poison because the sane folks of the feminist movement won't void their metaphorical membership cards. I'd say Republicans have the same problem with their racist nationalists, but they don't have the institutional power that feminism does. You won't see entire chunks of university budgets going …
/r/MensRights14/10/18 03:48 PM
29

Personally, I voted Trump just to spite the DNC. I usually vote Democrat, but this last election was disgusting. They gave Hillary complete financial control of the party, threw Bernie under the bus along with his voters, the liberal media itself actively pushed Trump because they thought it to be the easiest win, and there's the mysterious murder of the democrats network manager, Seth Rich, whom died in the heat of the wikileaks infodumps. And to top it all off, they tried to run with the worst…
/r/MensRights14/10/18 03:21 PM
-3

I mostly mean in general. We got problems in the states for sure, but the #metoo thing seems largely be contained within the liberal bubble. The people that sucked and fucked their way up the Hollywood ladder are turning on each other.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 12:15 PM
8

I feel for you straight guys. Ya'll are dealing with that insanity, meanwhile I'm living in the land of milk and honey with all the blow jobs and butt sex I'm getting as a gay dude.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:54 AM
-4

Well, to its credit, Europe is a fucking circus right now.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:52 AM
12

TheRedPill was where men with often severe mental damage from interactions with women could organize. These people didn't hardly exist a few years ago in such an organized fashion. They're a direct result of the man hate movement in feminism, and just like the flu, your symptomatic cough won't go away until you've cured the flu. Also, if you can find a REAL nazi organization anywhere except inside American prisons, I'll be flabbergasted. The only dummies talking about a 4th Reich are 4chan troll…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:25 AM
24

Yeah, that doesn't stop the media either.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 03:06 AM
5

Unfortunately, the machine they built into the system grinds up the innocent with the guilty all the same. I wonder if the irony of her situation is lost on her.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:26 PM
2

yes it is
/r/MensRights17/07/18 12:03 AM
1

Ya know I never said they would ban abortion. I said they'd vote along cultural values. When given the opportunity, they will fall in line with conservatives over progressives, if only because conservatives treasure the family values of the two parent home. They will inevitably have an effect on the face of law in the UK. Now to say if it'll be a good or bad effect is an entirely different story. There are quite a few positive values in Islam, and I've personally never met a Muslim I didn't like…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:50 PM
1

They are, however, the most popular name, which is certainly indicative of a large, growing population of second generation immigrants. This fact still supports my main point, being that the large and emerging second generation immigrant population will have their place at the table in local politics, and they will predominantly vote based on cultural values. A large portion of those kids attend private Islamic schools (ironically funded partially by your government). They are not going to be we…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:17 PM
1

Yeah, until you account for the spelling variations of the name "Muhammad". And that's just kids named Muhammad. How many other names do Muslim kids have? My estimates of your second generation immigrants is actually likely to be a conservative one.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:05 PM
0

Look dude, if 40% of boys are named Muhammed in the UK, let's assume 1 in 10 to be non affiliated with Islam (which I think is generous, as it is probably more like 1 in 1,000), that'd mean roughly 15% of eligible young male voters in the UK will be Muslim or at least from an Islamic culture and presumably would share many of the values of their parent culture. 49% of children born in the UK are female, and so we can presume a similar statistic within the foreign population. That means we just d…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:41 PM
1

Yeah, that's precisely where I was going with that. 40% of boys. That represents 20% of young adult votes. That's a massive chunk of voters.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:27 PM
3

Yeah, didn't you guys have roving gangs of Syrian men in the streets enforcing sharia law not all that long ago? And British values don't change rapidly? You guys just broke out of the euro union and then spent this last weekend spitting in the face of your only remaining friend. You guys have totally overturned plenty of your values in the last decade. You're doing a lot of mental gymnastics to avoid the realization that immigrants and their citizen children will vote along cultural lines for s…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:24 PM
2

I figured it went without saying that it's a boy's name. it is the most popular name though.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:14 PM
2

No, not all of it. The most popular child name in the UK, if you don't count spelling variations, is Muhammed. It's at something like 40% if I remember correctly. Now let's reference something; we know from correlative evidence that violent crime and murder rates dropped 20 years after abortion was legalized in America because an entire segment of the population (that being unwanted children) ceased to be. Now imagine what happens when you do the opposite of that, plus you tack on a foreign cult…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:25 PM
12

The most common name for a child in the UK is Muhammed. Give it 20 years. The euro governments suck at integration because they don't want to piss off their social Marxists for "cultural erasure" or something to the regard. Because of this, in 20 years, you'll have a massive voting block of religiously conservative Muslim men and women with virtually no cultural ties to national history. The UK government even funds Muslim private schools with very little oversight for what they're teaching.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 04:19 PM
28

Too much faith in science. I.. I just can't. You're spouting the kind of pseudo science bullshit I'd expect to hear from a conspiracy theorist flat earther type. We have satellites in space right now that can zoom in so specifically that it can read you the date on a dime in the street. The sheer audacity of your anti science rhetoric is simply flabbergasting. And moreover, it doesn't fucking matter what your kids want. You're the fucking parent and they're a God damn child. If they could have i…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 11:24 AM
40

You're a special kind of stupid dude. How do we measure "best interest of the child"? Well that's pretty fucking simple. Food, shelter, safety, mental well being, physical well being, educational opportunity, and any other thing you can think of to hopefully lead them to becoming a normal productive member of society. How do we know those things are good and we aren't just arbitrarily doing whatever? Oh, I dunno, maybe the last hundred or so years of medical research? Or the however many thousan…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:31 AM
14

I gotcha fam.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:33 AM
1

Okay, it was nice having a bit of conversation with you before you decided to derail it, hopefully you'll discover you'll go further without that attitude in the future.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 04:19 AM
2

No, you should have replied with something constructive to say.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:57 AM
1

Since you're relying on sarcasm at this point, I presume you're done acting civilized?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:53 AM
2

I don't presume it to be a conspiracy. But to infer to history, ya know Hitler and friends just wanted buyout of Germany by the Jewish to be overturned. Germany was in massive war debt from WW1 and their money was worth nothing. Hitler's regime organically came to power, but it doesn't change how terrible the consequences were. It very well may come to pass that we drive to hell on a road paved with good intention.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:55 AM
1

Liberals also dominate with media as well. They also have quite the grip on social media. They're quite poised for actual government and social domination, and very near globally to boot. I'm skeptical that the SJW movement is anything but a tool for those that are nefarious in their goals though, after all, you don't major in liberal arts if you're some kind of genius.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:00 PM
2

I think it's fair to say the replies you're getting are more due to that men have been consistently on the losing side of family courts, divorce courts, and are more heavily punished and more likely to be convicted. It's correlative to be sure, but that's not to say there aren't feminists out there that campaign to give women advantages, and many of them have stated goals like "kill all men", or "send all men to an island and use them like cattle for breeding purposes". But like I said, it is co…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:03 PM
7

Or maybe they just care about all the other problems men face, like the endless list of bullshit injustice we have to face in order to just survive in a world that more and more hates us for our gender and/or skin color. But hey, maybe you're right, maybe we all just had shitty parents.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:09 AM
15

Yeah, but of those people, how many of them are social justice types?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:24 PM
5

Luckily, she will be dealt a fair dose of six months probation to pay for her crimes. /s
/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:20 AM
1

Yeah, this is only going to last a long as it takes for somebody to sue the ever loving hell out of them.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:11 AM
1

Except this time you're defending a 31 year old that presumably had sex with a grade schooler. Yeah, I totally understand the premise behind the laws that address age gaps between teenagers and young adults. This isn't one of those cases. Furthermore, you brought up the term "age-ism". I'm not sure that you're aware, but this is a rallying cry for groups like NAMBLA. And to go even further, two teens dating isn't the same as an educator in a position of authority grooming their victim. We have s…
/r/MensRights28/10/17 07:53 AM
1

Are you really going to play a stupid technicality game. You know exactly what I mean with what I said, dumbass. Fucking kids is criminal, porn involving kids is criminal, nearly everything to do with your obsession with children is criminal. Don't even sit here and act like a smartass when you're defending child rapists. Fucking sick piece of shit.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:59 AM
5

Pedophilia is criminal. Let's presume the victim was 16. To what amount of grooming do you think was applied? How long did she invest time manipulating the victim with her authority until she had what she wants? It's criminal because it is a predatory act from a position of authority done to the most vulnerable of targets. And frankly, it's both disgusting and reprehensible that you would seriously defend this act of pedophilia to any degree. You should strongly consider rethinking your vile pos…
/r/MensRights27/10/17 09:37 PM
9

If they're taking tax dollars, I don't think they can legally do this. They're bound by anti discrimination laws.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:36 AM
1

The number one constant of these sorts of articles is the fact that it's coming out of the UK.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:55 AM
4

It's in the UK. It'll be a miracle if she gets jail time.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 04:57 AM
0

bacha bazi has been practiced for literally hundreds of years. And yes, Islam outlaws it, however, it appears to be culturally acceptable for the affluent to practice it. Kinda like how Catholic priests and western politicians do the same thing. People in positions of power, regardless of culture, will abuse that power.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:34 PM
2

Lulz, number 30. I doubt the author has to worry about that.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:42 AM
2

Biological warfare is an act of terrorism according to the patriot act.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 03:23 PM
2

At first I'm surprised, then I notice it's the UK, and then I'm suddenly not so surprised.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 11:37 PM
7

Nah, Hispanic in Texas.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:30 PM
4

Liberal arts is the spear point of the SJW agenda. These asshats find fertile soil in feel good civil liberty freedom stuff, then invert it like a parasite, until the host is perfectly adapted to serve the parasite.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 02:14 AM
16

If I remember correctly, he actually responded with "yes, I could identify as a second wave feminist".
/r/MensRights22/11/16 05:34 PM
2

I tell my straight friends I'm living in the world of milk and honey. They have to beg and perform special tricks for bjs and butt sex; meanwhile it's just the standard for my relationship.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 08:09 AM
3

Why would she be desirable in the first place? She hasn't worked in years and brings a negative balance to the table. He just wants his kid, not a parasite.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:27 PM
3

I don't think it would be equal for her to face tons of jail time, but I think it'd be fair if she faced paying for any damages to his reputation, job, life, etc in civil court.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:48 PM
21

If you take a stroll in public naked, do you really not expect people to stare? It doesn't matter what your gender is. If you want to go unnoticed, wear inconspicuous clothing.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 08:13 AM
2

So what of the countless child abuse cases with hetero couples? Plenty of hetero couples have done absolutely deplorable things to their children, from selling them into sex slavery to starving them to death for months at a time locked in a closet. The parent's sexuality isn't the issue, it's being shitty individuals, that's the problem.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:12 AM
33

Where is the justice of holding a victim responsible for the outcome of the crime committed against them?
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:00 AM
10

Turns out men's tears are largely calorie free.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 08:42 PM
2

So scale it to your income bracket.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 08:39 PM
1

I kinda got the feeling he was when it comes to foreigners. Either you hate em and want them out or you're a liberal. Granted, I don't know much about him to state that as fact.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 10:12 AM
10

I've literally seem people boast about their complete ignorance. It's as if being an uneducated retard is simply their calling. Hell, I've seen girls and women treat their stupidity like a feature of cuteness. But it's not like we didn't see this coming. Throughout American schools, smart kids were bullied and treated as outsiders. I presume they still are. Children are literally encouraged by their peers to be dumb brutes while the education system does nothing to approach this as a problem.
/r/MGTOW08/04/16 05:38 AM
5

Just gotta give it time. Feminists are melting down their political capital at a rapid pace.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 05:24 AM
1

Well, being from Kansas city, the Kansas Republicans, besides wrecking the state economy, have worked this sort of thing into law. Frankly, I'm worried that any Republican president will tow this line. I can understand hardcore Christians not wanting to have a gay wedding in their church, that's whatever, but if you're running a store, you shouldn't be able to discriminate based on any inherited or genetic metric. I haven't heard Trump mention the subject, so I don't really know where he stands …
/r/MGTOW01/04/16 01:57 PM
1

As a gay man, I seriously doubt he has any good intentions for folks like myself. But then again, I have serious doubts about anybody in the Republican party save for Ron Paul in regards to my rights. And it's not so much that I care about marriage equality, because I have no intention for marriage. I just don't want to get kicked out of Applebee's because of where I happen to store my dick for an hour or so every other day. Given the Republican agenda to legalize discrimination of this form, it…
/r/MGTOW31/03/16 11:03 PM
2

I think Ronda Rousey said it best. Your pay should be based on your value to your audience. She was the highest paid fighter in the UFC because she puts on a damn good show and brought in the biggest audience. That's between both the men's and women's division. Their pay isn't sexist, they simply aren't compelling athletes. Edit: here's Ronda replying to the very similar question on the pay dispute for Australian women's soccer. https://youtu.be/w5xRHz8Su6E
/r/MGTOW31/03/16 10:44 PM
0

I'd go even further back than that. In the vast majority of mammal species, females are dominant leaders of social species. Across the board, there is only one reason: they control sex. They may not have direct power, but being the power behind the throne has always suited them well in their ultimate desires. Through evolution, women have perfected the perfect dope. Through social engineering, they ensure he is well trained for his destined position in life. And through selectively breeding only…
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 02:45 PM
1

They are going with augmented reality as opposed to VR. I think it's coming out at the back end of fall or winter holiday, but don't quote me on it. I can't wait for it either.
/r/MGTOW23/03/16 05:06 AM
4

Problem is that you lose more money in the auditing than you do from the parasites. So they get to continue to exist. On the plus side, state sponsored cheap whores.
/r/MGTOW22/03/16 06:49 AM
2

Gonna have to agree to disagree. I believe in the prosperity of liberty and have hard bound statistics and results to back it up. You'll not get anywhere with your ultimately regressive viewpoint. I thought you were a troll for a while there, but looking at your history on your profile, you're literally just legitimately insane. You think scientists made up fossils for fuck sake. You can literally go outside and dig them out of the ground. You're so far up your own ass that your on the edge of d…
/r/MGTOW18/03/16 12:55 AM
28

Their drop in new students of 25%. Apparently psychotic feminists aren't as popular as they thought.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:10 AM
1

They're only just now talking about men's financial abortion in Sweden. These ideas are unpopular because it means the intellectual death of feminism, meanwhile, your ideas are the reason feminism exists. I'd rather not justify their existence. I'd rather destroy their true goals of financial slavery of men. Furthermore, my ideas are fair, which are par for liberty oriented nations. We deserve equal reproductive rights. There is no liberty in the restriction of rights. Only in the expansion of r…
/r/MGTOW16/03/16 02:40 AM
1

I think you speak for yourself in regards to your limited ability of comprehension. My ideas for expanded rights of men are mainstream on this sub; you're the fringe psychopath taking body shots from Trump's hairy chest and chasing it with Alex Jones brand kool-aid.
/r/MGTOW16/03/16 02:22 AM
2

So in other words, no, you don't have any intelligent replies short of the grunting rhetoric of fat southern man with one too many Big Dog t-shirts.
/r/MGTOW16/03/16 02:04 AM
2

I never suggested that I was pro feminism, you did. I just don't have fox news brainwashing me 24/7. Traditional values fucked this generation. It enabled the level of corruption we have today. I don't believe that restricting rights is a good idea. We should expand on men's rights. You don't make equality by knocking people down a peg. Rights restrictions brought us such lovely things like two different prohibitions, pouring men and money into prison to a degree unseen ever in history. Men shou…
/r/MGTOW15/03/16 05:58 PM
3

And how do you expect to do that? And get, while we're at it, how about we legalize child labor again too? Or better yet, you could just move to just about any Islamic country and you can see plainly what your insane point of view brings. The American golden age is gone, and so is the industrial Era. None of those shit ideas will work. This is America, law ought to only expand human rights, not restrict them.
/r/MGTOW15/03/16 03:38 PM
1

Do you even have a plan for saving those children after they're born to bad families that didn't want them in the first place? Moreover, how do you plan to prevent abortions? Gonna follow every pregnant American woman around for nine months with an anti abortion police force? Anti abortion laws are a step backwards. It enhances crime, puts unnecessary weight on an already overstretched welfare system, and damages the economy by forcing people that otherwise wouldn't have had kids to focus on chi…
/r/MGTOW15/03/16 05:16 AM
5

Better than putting unwanted children in prisons after their shit abusive parents fuck them up. For all the conservative voices, I'd wonder how many of them have adopted their own low class born minority child.
/r/MGTOW15/03/16 03:13 AM
7

This about as ignorant as it gets. While abortion does serve this purpose, the more important purpose of abortion is the effect on crime. Rates of murder dropped 80% in the nineties. We shouldn't be arguing to restrict abortion rights, we should be arguing to expand our own so that men actually have reproduction rights. Being able to perform financial abortion, for instance, would solve the problem of the baby trap, leading to far fewer single parent situations.
/r/MGTOW15/03/16 02:37 AM
7

Gay bro here. I get all the butt sex and blow jobs I could ever ask for, my boyfriend works just as hard as I do, so our income ratio is awesome. We pay an equal share on bills, then spend the rest individually. We buy each other gifts and take each other out to dinner at equal levels. Personally, I really love it. But there are plenty of shitty gay dudes out there. So my testimony is kinda anecdotal. Edit: I should add, I work more, so my boyfriend takes care of chores while I handle budget stu…
/r/MGTOW04/03/16 11:14 AM
1

Yup, because objectifying an object is wrong. /s
/r/MGTOW19/02/16 11:02 AM
51

Because it's wrong to objectify an object.
/r/MGTOW17/02/16 12:49 PM
2

Obviously not. Not in the legal sense of the word. I think you guys missed my point. What kind of shitty parent leaves their 12 year old in a situation where they're gonna get banged?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 07:17 PM
-8

A twelve year old lacks the capacity for consent, regardless of gender. Alas, he should have shot his own kid for being such a shitty parent.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:00 AM
2

Here's the really funny part; when they do get drafted, a big portion of them will get pregnant just to stay out of battle. Much like baby boomers, there would be an entire generation of draft dodger babies.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:32 AM
8

The funniest part is when the establishment reaches the goal line, the feminists they used will be the first group disposed of. If there were ever a real patriarchy, the irony of feminists aiding in its power grab is lost on them as a whole.
/r/MGTOW10/02/16 11:09 AM
1

I'm just using red as the metric for the average feminist.
/r/MGTOW04/02/16 06:02 PM
3

http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/879162-big-red She washes every meal down with a big gulp of men's tears. /s
/r/MGTOW04/02/16 05:52 PM
2

You don't think big red could put down a thousand bucks of food every month? I think it's probably a conservative estimate.
/r/MGTOW04/02/16 03:10 PM
2

DNA test the fetus, match it up with the dummy that knocks her up and give them both a dishonorable discharge.
/r/MGTOW03/02/16 10:28 PM
8

That explains that.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 11:16 PM
13

It's quite surprising she got this punishment, considering how lax UK judges are on women.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 07:06 PM
6

She was really fucking terrible. Something like a .4 kd ratio. My minimum allowed for my clan was 1.5. The Bros just wanted to see her tits I guess. That shit always bothered me. Play a fucking puzzle game of you're that bad at shooters.
/r/MGTOW31/01/16 11:38 PM
9

My Bros let this chic into our CoD party at one point that wouldn't ever stop fucking bothering me to give her my care packages. Of course, being selfish as I am, I eventually got tired of hearing her squeak into my ear in party chat. "bitch, you can have my package in your mouth. Go get your own kill streaks." she pretty much quit talking me after that.
/r/MGTOW31/01/16 08:53 PM
2

And for arguments sake, the bible and Jewish texts have verses about dominating cultures also. That's what Germany's context of War was all about in WW2; battling the influence of Jewish culture. Would you use the same reasoning to combat Islam? Perhaps the same means also? What keeps you from being a hypocrite without rallying against all religions and cultures universally?
/r/MGTOW23/01/16 07:27 PM
0

You know, Islamic culture actually has been good to science and education in its past. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_in_the_medieval_Islamic_world Historically speaking, the horrifically barbaric behavior of Islam is a relatively new thing brought upon it by the meddling of Western culture, primarily American culture, which used it to destabilize the region and manipulate it for the cause of War. I think it's fair to say you're largely speaking out of ignorance. All things considered, …
/r/MGTOW23/01/16 06:37 PM
2

Let's be frank; wouldn't MGTOW singles be better off with Muslim culture at the helm? All things considered, the only bad thing they got going is the religious extremism. Take away that and they'll crush feminism under the weight of political correctness. It's literally feminism kryptonite. Hell, even MGTOW that have been divorced; do you really think a Islamic culture would let women get away with your kids, your property and half your money until the day she shrivels up?
/r/MGTOW23/01/16 05:25 PM
2

I purposely play dumb personally. Nothing frustrates a person that's an intentional jerk more than somebody that reacts with nothing but kindness. I'm kind of a masochist I suppose, but I really get great joy as they ramp up their bitch game further and further until they realize everybody around them sees em got the total bitch they happen to be. Usually around that time, they'll retreat in shame. Most of my experience is work related though. I've seen em quit outright or get themselves fired. …
/r/MGTOW20/01/16 06:22 AM
-1

If I were in the same situation, I'd be at the front gate of that prison the day she gets out with a loaded 12 gauge in hand.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:19 AM
0

It says that her singing voice was worse than his pick up lines.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:01 PM
1

You aren't shadowbanned.
/r/MGTOW15/01/16 06:40 AM
8

So, in other words, to prove it is because of bias, we'd have to directly ask the judge if he made his sentence based on gender? I mean, sentencing I presume would be safe to say is an overall psychological trend. For example, if you have tattoos all over your face with skulls, death and shit like that, you're more likely to get harsh sentencing. In this scenario, the evidence you want is so unattainable, that even if I were to compile a list of this judge's cases that shown an overall trend of …
/r/MensRights09/01/16 02:10 AM
65

Men receive 63% higher sentences than women. They're also significantly more likely to avoid conviction or incarceration, and are twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted. How's that for anecdotal? http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/1874742
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:17 AM
4

1.German men stop breeding. 2.Let the German women marry migrants with strict cultures. 3.back to square one for feminism because all women's rights have been revoked. 4.??? 5.profit
/r/MGTOW08/01/16 06:23 AM
9

Dude, feminists and their neck beard servants are a far more terror inducing than any ISIS ever hoped to be.
/r/MGTOW29/12/15 08:56 PM
3

Sounds like sound logic to me. The bit about diamonds couldn't be more true.
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 03:29 AM
1

My guess is that it's more reflective of supply. In that, demand is higher and supply is more low because more purchases of girls toys are made. The supply could also be intentionally low, but I doubt the prices are intentionally higher. Of course, this is purely speculation.
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 03:16 AM
9

As soon as they quoted the 79 cents on the dollar myth, it threw out any sense of honesty this article brought into my mind. It's probably all bullshit.
/r/MGTOW27/12/15 08:03 PM
2

I enjoy martial arts quite a bit. My new years resolution is gonna be to bulk up. I'm kinda just taking my time. I took all this year changing my eating habits and dropped 50 pounds (I only cut sugars out of my diet; otherwise I still eat whatever I want), so next year in buying some weights and I'm gonna dedicate a few hours a week doing reps and pushing my flexibility with some yoga. I started biking a couple months ago and feel better than I did when I was 20 (I'm 30 now). You are your bigges…
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 11:03 AM
34

So, objectifying objects is a no no now? Where's her campaign against dildos? Is that not an objectification of male genitalia?
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 09:14 AM
1

All things considered, the human form is actually quite artistic. I can certainly appreciate these photos for their artistic value, however, like all things, a drop of feminism poisons the entire well.
/r/MGTOW20/12/15 04:06 AM
10

Why are judges in the UK such pieces of shit?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:19 PM
2

If you're willing to be a doormat, you shouldn't be surprised when you get walked on.
/r/MGTOW10/12/15 09:46 PM
2

You can see just how insecure these girls are from the ten ounces of makeup on her face. I bet she has to use a paint scraper to get it all off before bed.
/r/MGTOW07/12/15 01:54 PM
1

No no, you mean call anybody who threatens violence against men a feminist.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:18 PM
1

Triggered. Lulz
/r/MGTOW02/12/15 06:04 PM
6

Just superimpose big red's face on to every chick your dick responds to. That'll do it.
/r/MGTOW30/11/15 06:48 PM
1

He put the ring on her finger, it's his problem, not yours. You have no higher moral obligation beyond doing your job. If you feel like reeking havoc, then upload it to YouTube and do an anon post to both their Facebook pages.
/r/MGTOW30/11/15 06:15 PM
4

Oooo, that's a good one. When our computer overlords take over, they'll have a special place in their motherboard for you for having helped finance their inception. XD
/r/MGTOW26/11/15 12:52 AM
2

I was thinking market investments. My uncle works in AIG, so I let him handle my investments. We got a few weird things that we think will play out well in the future. I've been focusing on lithium and hydrogen energy solutions with some nice results.
/r/MGTOW25/11/15 11:49 PM
3

Might try investing into weird projects. Sometimes they can pay out big.
/r/MGTOW25/11/15 10:35 PM
2

As if the rest of the world is so much better.
/r/MGTOW23/11/15 08:27 AM
0

If your nonviolent act is an attempt to get a violent response, you shouldn't be surprised with the results.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:39 PM
2

What's bad is that isn't even true. Tall people are actually more intelligent than short people, and men on average are taller than women. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200901/why-men-are-more-intelligent-women
/r/MensRights14/11/15 06:54 PM
3

Frankly, that's not a fair question, it's a misdirection. Those men serve "fair" sentences. Less than ten years is a weak sentence. People spend more time for nonviolent felony crimes.
/r/MGTOW01/11/15 01:25 AM
5

Instead of presuming all men rapists, you could teach people to speak up if they don't consent. Seems the smarter policy to me.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:18 PM
2

You don't need to be in love with your hand to jerk it, right? Yes, people have sex just because it feels good. That said, did you know that a domesticated pig, if released into the wild, will take on the characteristics of its feral cousins? Unless you're planning on living out your days in an Asian country, any girl you bring home will communicate with other westernized girls and essentially revert to a feral form. With that, I wouldn't set your expectations so high; the fall is only shittier …
/r/MGTOW28/10/15 04:12 PM
4

This is more a problem of parenting. This probably isn't the first time they begged their child. Weak parenting is the leading cause of shitty children.
/r/MGTOW26/10/15 06:19 AM
6

I wonder if it'd be possible to install a plug in onto your Web browser that inserts a comment section on almost every Web page you visit, detects email addresses listed by article authors, then just dumps copies of the comments right into their mail. It would be completely unmoderated, of course, and completely out of their control.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 03:02 PM
20

Reaffirming crazy girls that being crazy is a sane strategy.
/r/MGTOW17/10/15 11:06 PM
1

Lulz. He's just a cog in the machine. XD
/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:47 PM
6

Probably a civil engineer.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:46 PM
7

I remember reading somewhere that vr porn will be the standard in ten years and in twenty sex droids will be common. Just in time for me to be an old fart. Retirement is gonna be good for me I think.
/r/MGTOW16/10/15 07:03 AM
12

Yeah, especially when it's a woman raping a child. :/
/r/MensRights15/10/15 05:21 PM
2

That's a good point. They should probably pay the fee for the in home decorator too.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:35 PM
5

Soooo, I guess that means they should also have to maintain the costs of a maid for the man because without, their standard of living goes down.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 06:10 PM
3

Living the dream with ya. Since my boyfriend and I typically have the same agenda, it's like everything we plan for gets done pretty quick.
/r/MGTOW13/10/15 09:14 PM
1

Yeah, I meant it all in comedy however, not meant to be serious. I don't actually believe marriage is any sort of good idea. Not sure if you missed that part. XP
/r/MGTOW09/10/15 02:07 AM
1

I dunno, would you drop 1,500 to bang somebody like, say, Mila Kunez? And keeping them on contract for exclusive rights. Imagine you are looking for a mechanic. Of course, the mechanic down the road is gonna be reasonably priced, but now you want exclusive rights to that mechanic. That price is gonna go up. That said, there should be an enforceable penalty when said mechanic goes and works on somebody else's undercarriage. I only play Devils advocate for the sake of comedy though, marriage laws …
/r/MGTOW09/10/15 01:32 AM
1

You shouldn't maintain a relationship if you can't even begin to maintain yourself. You know what's harder than fixing your life? Trying to fix her's while you're at it.
/r/MGTOW07/10/15 06:24 PM
0

Lulz, it's okay, we fuck up all the time, who am I to point fingers.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 09:02 PM
20

What the fuck UK? do something about your fucking pedophiles and pig fuckers already.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 02:29 PM
1

Well there's your problem right there, it happened in England, home of the royal pedo family, protected by the pedo Scotland Yard, while they're all face fucking pigs.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:31 PM
10

Given her career, my guess is that she would find a rich fellow among her clientele, stick it out for a year or so, maybe even have a kid so she can suck the life out of him for a long as possible after the planned divorce.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:34 AM
4

That makes entirely too much sense, so it must be wrong.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:24 AM
17

Another female rapist with the defense, "I did it because it made me feel good." Give me a break already.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:47 PM
11

So she had a crappy childhood and made her share of bad decisions. I fail to see where this is the collective fault of men or some intricate plan laid out by the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:42 PM
2

You're technically right, women are genetically programmed to find good fathers attractive. Likewise, men find symmetrical and large breasts genetically appealing because it's a sign that she has healthy mammary glands and healthy generic stock. The issue here lies in what is culturally correct. The hypocrisy is in that women can freely objectify men without fear of reprisal but a man simply can not.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:17 PM
26

It's not as bad as having a penis. Being male is your ultimate sin.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:02 PM
1

Just more UFC fighters doing stupid crazy shit. The champ and friends have a tendency to do whatever they want. Rumor has it that Jon Jones was coked out for years.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:37 PM
22

And apparently have better writers than gawker.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 03:25 PM
7

It'd be pure comedy of the crime got upgraded because the bite wound became infected by her awful dental hygiene issues.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:58 AM
8

Jesus, looks like she is really invested in a career as a wood chipper with a mouth like that.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:57 AM
7

Well, they don't see it as disruption, they think they're fighting the members of the hall of doom. In their minds, only their speech is free.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:02 PM
34

They admitted to it later that day, stating that they were harassed out of there because they weren't allowed their free speech. Anything a feminist sees as an arm of the Men's Rights Movement is liable to be a target on their radar and they aren't above any dirty technique. Ranging from blow horns, false fire alarms, all the way up to bomb threats. Literally, not kidding at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:18 PM
2

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattress_Performance_%28Carry_That_Weight%29 This sub has blown up on this controversy. My point is that when facts become offensive, these rules will protect the offended, which ought not be protected from rightful criticism.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 02:39 PM
9

They are banning subs that they say witch hunt and harass. They could ban this sub and get away with it. For instance, what if mattress girl wrote in a complaint? Would the articles posted be considered harassment enough through a Pao colored lense to consider a ban?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:32 PM
15

They banned r/neogafinaction. It was a gamergate sub. They are banning opposition, so chances are, this sub is on their list.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:06 PM
2

I think it's all in the context. I've worked in many a place where people purposely test that line of how far they can go and without telling them it makes you uncomfortable or drawing a line not to be crossed, harmless flirting can easily escalate. Hell, sales floor people are often taught that friendly physical contact can be the difference between locking in a sale and letting it float on by.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:20 PM
1

It's not as bad as being featured as the butt of their joke.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:59 PM
2

Can you imagine how pissed they'd be if we hooked up some loud speakers to some drones and wirelessly took over one of their events blasting debunking info on their favorite facts. Out of spite though, I'd rather just blast the song "lonely goat" from "The Sound Of Music"; that'd really rile em up.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:51 PM
104

They say she was drunk and messed up on coke, then fathom why a good girl like this would make a false accusation. Setting the bar pretty low on that definition methinks.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:38 PM
21

This probably the typical mating patterns of the domestic American SJW.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:17 PM
1

Lulz, maybe they were based with navy guys.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/15 04:16 PM
1

To their credit, they probably just back home from a country where all the lady folk wear bed sheets as a fashion statement.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/15 03:46 PM
1

I suppose if your operating under the feminist definition that's true. Course, that'd also means there's a real raunchy gang bang going on between two pieces of bread and my toaster every morning that invariably ends as a wet buttery mess in my mouth.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/15 03:30 PM
2

Dude, gay people are MRA too. Watch your fucking mouth.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:00 PM
1

I'd say hatred of the oppressing class is a result of social engineering math. Firstly, it is typical that poverty increases crime and violence; it's not a matter that they want to commit crime, rather, it's a result of being impoverished. Secondly, hated and violence is also typical among classes of people with very little interaction between the two groups. For instance, in areas where race based class oppression exists, there is often very little integration. It isn't because they're naturall…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:53 PM
-4

That's some powerful data.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:15 PM
5

I disagree. At the age of sixteen, the male body is at a high point in hormone levels. Speaking generally, at this point in life, the average American is still very much in the lifestyle of just being a teen/kid, and that's a massive far cry from the stress and responsibility involved with being an adult. A serious relationship between child and adult thrusts the child into adult life entirely too early. A purely sexual relationship shows at least that some advantage is being taken. And I think …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:44 AM
7

So, with those differences in mind, are you suggesting that we ought to have two separate sets of laws that depends on your gender? Should we restrict the rights of one gender over the other? I don't think so. Frankly, I think juries should have absolutely no exposure to the qualities of a criminal. Against the state, you should be treated as a non-race, non-gendered individual. Only the evidence is relevant, and introducing irrelevant information merely muddies the course of justice.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:03 AM
1

Maury international anybody? You know you'd watch it, especially if Judy is coming up just after.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:52 PM
1

You could say there was, "thunder in paradise."
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:31 PM
6

Being capable of making a decision doesn't necessarily mean you're wise enough to make the best decision. And I remember 15 too; my life revolved around my dick because my hormones were going full tilt. I made a lot of bad decisions, but they were with my peers, whom were doing the same. As an educator, they have a responsibility to teach good decision making skills, not take advantage of the lack thereof.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:29 PM
1

Their organized meetings tend to revolve around deporting men to a fantasy island.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:47 PM
3

It's like the evil feminist skynet sent a feminator backwards in time.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:16 PM
2

Is that what they got from that? I figured that looked more like "tried to stiff a prostitute" or "tried to go too far with the stripper".
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:40 PM
9

Yeah, I'm all for it. An entire generation of mostly illiterate feminists. I'm not sure on the effectiveness of encouraging people not to read something, but they could ask the church how that's worked out for them so far, or maybe Hitler.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:50 AM
4

It's for the click bait. If it were labeled "four girls beat up one girl", it loses sensation potential in the viewer's eyes. Anything to get people riled up. What is clearly nothing more than a local kids fight has now become something they can regurgitate into the waiting mouth of the Internet. No matter how they swing it, integrity doesn't get clicks.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:20 PM
2

Ya know, back at Kansas university, there was a pretty diverse group of people in my petroleum engineering course. Men and women of all color save for one; you'd have a very hard time finding any white girls in the field. I have very serious doubts that there is a single feminist anywhere in the petroleum field, quite frankly.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:36 PM
4

Baby steps. If they're crawling out of their cesspool of bullshit, you certainly won't catch me trying to shove em back in. If they can hash out a way to come to terms with reality through the lense of their idealism, more power to em.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 08:52 PM
5

Did you go to Japan in a time machine? From what I can tell, they love absorbing western culture.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:07 PM
1

Do you not have any concept of history? We already tried segregating blacks and in my recollection, it only helped to incite more racism. How is segregating people based off of gender and skin color supposed to solve "isms"? How can defining a minority different change the minds of people that they aren't different? We're all equal, and it's more than high time folks like you get with the picture so we can solve real problems like poverty and war.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:47 PM
2

Lemme fix a couple things here for ya. Many 'people' have (been assaulted), and they have the right to feel safe. Many 'people' are sexually assaulted and sometimes raped in bars. It feels a lot less like segregation and special treatment of you treat everybody the same. And being that we're all equal, ought not the solution be to treat everybody equally?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:37 PM
8

Your argument is false. Men and women harass each other at nearly identical rates. The false statistics you're likely citing comes from a study that excluded "made to penetrate" from inclusion under the term "rape" for the premise of their study. In other words, they fixed the numbers so you have more ammunition for your pity machine to grind human suffering into cash. The moral bankruptcy of modern feminism knows no bounds. There are no lines you won't cross, no people you won't throw under the…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:30 PM
3

That's what bouncers are for. And frankly, if you were a predator looking for a victim, don't you think it would be easier to find one on ladies night? And it's not as if you need permission to leave your own house. Do you think for one second that a bar or club is going to willfully ignore sexual harassment claims? If so, why on God's green earth would you want to put yourself in harm's way? That's the great thing about capitalism, you see, if you don't think a place of business is the right pl…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:13 PM
1

Almost all criminals are victims of circumstance and many issues could be solved with therapy or an escape route from poverty. They display their Sexism by only selectively applying their "sympathy".
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:53 AM
1

They sure do like to pat themselves on the back, huh.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:45 AM
9

She has one foot set outside of the gene pool already, good for her.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:11 PM
2

It's so similar to the religion vs atheists thing that it's eerie. One of these groups is living in a total fantasy, and have worked it out to make it culturally accepted crazy. The other is nestled in reality, and punished for talking about the elephant in the room.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:18 PM
2

I found the solution! http://www.go-girl.com
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:18 PM
3

Maybe they could just invent a better toilet for women? Something more expedient. Or maybe a better more efficient layout of the bathrooms? For a group that's supposed to be about women, they sure do have a lot to say about men.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:07 AM
5

An inkling of knowledge of anatomy could go a long way for this lady. Men have hips shaped differently than women, and thus, anatomically, "manspreading" is simply the most natural and comfortable way of sitting. And if she really wants girls to man up, telling them to try being a passive aggressive bitch ain't the way to go. Man up would mean standing there and waiting for a seat like every other person.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 06:38 PM
1

Oh Hells ya, let em do it. Once they start stepping on each other's toes in the scramble for victim payoffs, they'll start tearing each other apart. Think of the irony of all these single mom's pushing for this now for their own greed. Twenty years from now, her son is back at home living in the basement while his ex wife gets to send a bill to her. And considering the state of divorce and child custody in America, it'll be mom that gets that bill, dad has long since been kicked out of their liv…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:09 PM
6

I think feminists have a sort of filter, like on Charlie brown. You know those parents are saying something, but for Charlie and the crew, it might as well be white noise. Essentially, feminists lack open mindedness. When you speak with them, they can only understand what you say within the context of their own world view. They lack the critical thinking skills to truly play devils advocate.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:59 PM
11

You're seriously still going on about race? You want to see statistics? Clearly, you're too uneducated on every point you're arguing and you lack even having read any statistics at all, you just make presumptions. You quote race as a diversion of the actual point. This isn't a discussion, it's a child at the adult table, trying to sound important. If you want to have a real discussion, you're welcome to try again with real points and arguments, rather than supposition, classic liberal wordplay, …
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:28 PM
7

And to every single one of your points, where's your links, statistics and proof? You're making long reaching presumptions. Men are considered more guilty. Men on average are punished more severely and convicted more often then women on every level, despite committing many crimes at the same rates or lower, such as child neglect and abuse. That's not even getting into rape and skin color where statistics diverge even further from common sense. Mother fucking gamergate. Or how about just a walk i…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 03:30 PM
2

Question is, since it's British court, will they go easy on her because she's a woman, or because she's a pedophile?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:45 PM
1

Feminists will use the law to exercise power over porn websites by making false reports I imagine. Much the same way they do everything else.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 06:16 PM
1

It's okay buddy, we can't all be Americans.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 05:01 PM
2

Erika. Lulz. I guess when you need to make a stand, sometimes it's better to just take a seat. XD
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:36 PM
6

I'd start wearing a skirt, claiming Transgender rights, and light up that ladies room every single day, making sure to eat boiled eggs for breakfast every day.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:53 AM
2

If anything, I feel a sort of enraged pity for em. It must be an awful fate to be that disconnected with reality, but to a certain degree, they bring the consequences on themselves.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:53 PM
1

How are you supposed to "shred the patriarchy" by completely avoiding it?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:42 PM
5

I'm glad somebody else was thinking this.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:42 PM
1

I couldn't really think of anything comparitive to this level of bonkers, if you can, feel free to fill in the blanks for me. And to be fair, I'm comparing the two levels of audacity of the two opinions, not necessarily their actual content. Frankly, I couldn't give less of a crap about abortion; I'm gay, it has no relevance to me and I'd rather not cross under that shitstorm of a controversy.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 09:44 PM
4

My apologies. I couldn't bring myself to even finish the article because the audacity of it is just so damn immense. Who even says crazy shit like that? It's straight up bat shit bonkers.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 09:04 PM
2

It's not really an attack, as much as I'm using it as reference. The Republican party has enough blood on their hands if I really wanted attack them, it wouldn't really be all that hard. Seriously, they've said crazier shit than that.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:41 PM
25

As a gay man myself, I find the suggestion incredibly offensive. Nor has the act of taking it in the behind made me less of a man. To take something that is normal for my bedroom and turn it into a tool of shame. This is on the same level as the Republican presumption that since abortion is cool, rape must be okay too. ( http://m.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/28/1281151/-Maine-GOP-Rep-Apologizes-for-Saying-Men-Should-Get-to-Rape-Women-Because-Abortion )
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:57 PM
1

They can't ever take money from your disability check every month. In order to take your money, she'll have to convince you to give it up willingly.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:14 PM
1

From what I understand, there has been active campaigning by feminist groups to maintain the definition of rape not to include "made to penetrate" and do the same actively with statistics. When you include this factor, it shows that men are nearly often victims as women. Omission of data, loophole or no, is at least to say a bit corrupt? Certainly we'll agree feminism is very much quite interested in empowering women, however, I'd go far as to say that feminism is willing to notorious methods of…
/r/MensRights13/10/14 01:04 PM
3

But that was such a bad movie, how could it get its own subject section. Lulz
/r/MensRights08/10/14 09:33 PM
14

Of course she's throwing a fit; if this takes off well, women will lose the capacity to enslave men with their womb for 18 years at a time. All of a sudden, women will have to take responsibility for their deceitful actions.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 06:17 PM
6

Talk to your county cops. If that doesn't work, escalate it higher up through the ranks. Eventually somebody will have to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:13 AM
1

I dunno, feminists tend to be liberals, and liberals have a tendency to be less traditional, and thus, less controlling over what their kids watch. I see this kinda Disney garbage undermining conservative family values.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 09:06 PM
4

It's not all that surprising. Simply let your money do the talking for ya and never put a penny towards trash like this.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 12:38 PM
10

TIL feminists read comics.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:38 PM
-2

You're shoving an awful lot of words in my mouth. Firstly, I never said she should get special treatment, I said she be treated within context of the law, punished to fit the severity of the crime. Secondly, she couldn't do much damage, obviously. She was a technologically ignorant dummy, lashing out violently against a person when she thought was operating with bad intention. She sincerely believed she was doing the right thing. Thirdly, you're barbaric if you lash out with excessive force agai…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:20 PM
-4

I don't understand how she was charged differently than anybody else would. The judge used sound judgement. She made a dumb mistake. I've seen plenty of guys get off easy for equally stupid decisions. This is sensationalist dribble, and pales in comparison to the real issues, like men being treated unfairly in custody court or that the homeless population is predominantly male.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:25 AM
-3

No, I think the punishment ought to be tailored to fit the crime. She made a fool of herself in public. She didn't rob him at gunpoint.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 09:11 AM
-7

I'm just speaking from a legal point of view here. If Ronda Rousey had strolled up to this fellow and twisted his arm off in an arm bar, the penalty would be more severe. She obviously was operating out of sheer ignorance, and I don't think just because she's willing to swing on you means that you ought to swing on her. I'd prefer to resolve any altercation with limited force. There's plenty of ways to hold a person without harming them, even in cases where your opponent is more physically power…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:51 AM
-16

A guy would be able to do a lot more damage to a woman if he shared the conviction that the girl did. It was pretty obvious that it was mostly inconvenient that this girl attacked him, she wasn't exactly putting him in mortal danger. And frankly, if this chick is crazy like that on a daily basis, it's only a matter of time before she is standing in that court room all over again.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:25 AM
1

A recent study found that facts don't change people's minds, and in fact, makes them trust you less. The best way to get a person to agree with you is to identify with you.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 02:06 AM
7

Diversion tactics and attacking the victim are common tools for an oppressive regime. Perhaps a look in the mirror shall suffice?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:52 PM
1

The cultural reinforcement of gender norms is also a biological construct. Is beneficial for the survival of the species. Largely, our gender rules are dictated by biology. It's largely the same among all mammals.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:22 AM
1

The error in this is that gender IS biologically determined. I recall a story of a child that was born male, but due to complications, had his penis removed and was classified as female. His entire life, he yearned for male identity, but was boxed into his female persona, and eventually went suicidal at a young age. For the life of me I can't remember his name though. However, the point is, is that gender identity is a function of evolution. Men have been doing things like hunting, providing for…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:50 PM
4

I think it's also particularly harsh for the LGBT community because for us, gender identity is HUGELY important. It's often the reason why some folks choose to transition; they feel like their gender doesn't match their biology. It seems to me like feminism has an obsession with the term "eradication". They can say that men love to destroy, but frankly, this often their primary solution to many of their so called issues.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:24 PM
4

The name of her presentation is the title of the post. It's not really misleading at all, it's her entire goal. :/
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:20 PM
4

Jesus, the scowl on her face is just plain nasty. Somebody needs to create a gender shifting mirror so she can take a look at herself and realize she is the monster she's trying to fight.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:02 PM
8

How edgy. I bet this is super gratifying to all those college radfems mastering on women's studies. Once again, another wonderful example of feminism's "if you're not with us, you're against us" thought pattern. The patriarchy being the all encompassing term for every other person on the planet.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:56 PM
1

Jeez, the sheer amount of oil used on these guys is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 11:30 PM
1

I'll give bigotry an attitude no matter where it comes from. MRA is NOT a safe haven for lady bashers, racists, or any brand of supremacist. You seem to continuously stereotype women, and I gotta tell ya, it's not funny. Feminists aren't unhappy, not are they the joy police, they're simply misguided individuals. You may want to try a different sub if your opinion is different.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:59 AM
1

This is a serious rights movement. We don't need bigotry or outright detracting statements to muck up what we wish to achieve here. Yeah, we hate feminism in its modern form and even more so in its radical form, but we don't hate women and certainly don't think less of them. They are equals, we simply wish that authority figures would recognize it.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:34 AM
2

The irony of this statement (with regards to grammar) almost cracked my cell phone screen. Intelligence is a factor of individual education, not your genitals.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:00 AM
1

Yeah, really just to suggest castration at all, regardless of gender, is pretty archaic and vicious. Causing bodily harm to any individual for anything but self defense should be completely out of the question in any situation.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:55 AM
3

It would probably be more accurate to say it's what her lawyer told her to do. He'll most certainly get a piece of that pie one way or the other, and the juicier and more delicious the pie, the better off he'll be.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:53 PM
3

Dear feminism: He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:35 AM
2

Ya know, knowing feminists of her grade, she'd probably do it with a smile on her face and a song in her heart and still find time to complain that she makes less than men do for doing to same job.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:19 AM
8

She did suggest castration. She said that for every girl mutilated, a family senior should be castrated. It just seems like castration is a go to card for feminists.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:37 PM
16

What is it with feminists and the suggestion of castration? It's one of their go to solutions. "Here's this problem, it should be a female only problem, but I want it solved right now. Men should care about it so much that they drop everything else for me, or else we'll start lobbing dicks off." Did anybody else get that from this?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 07:41 PM
6

Getting old is not going to serve you well, methinks.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 05:07 PM
3

She lied for years. It's a terrible deception. She ought to have stayed on birth control. I wouldn't be able to trust somebody like that and frankly, the father ought to be informed when his child is about to be pureed.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 03:27 AM
2

I agree, the predator will do anything in their power to mentally disable their prey. You can certainly blame him for accepting it, however, it doesn't make her any less despicable. It's not unreasonable to expect people to be civilized; a predator will feed on this desire as any sociopath would.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 12:13 PM
16

I couldn't even finish it. Pure drivel.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 06:43 PM
2

You're either just trolling now, or you're under educated. The base argument is on teaching boys not to rape. My argument is that beyond what we naturally teach our children, it's unnecessary and even perhaps counter productive to teach boys not to rape. If it were that the natural state of mankind was violence, we'd all conduct violence on a massive scale. You are wrong however, violent criminals are a minority, and after accounting for poverty induced violent crimes, they are an even smaller m…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 09:13 PM
2

You're referencing to the developing years in which children test authority. By the time boys are going through puberty, they know the difference between right and wrong. Violence is not the natural state of humans, nor any other breed of ape. We are social, just, and generally benevolent naturally. Culture, family structure, and poverty have more to do with violence than the natural state, and I think it's safe to presume most kids are taught to be nice and do the right thing.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:41 PM
4

I think you just tapped into what skinny was talking about.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:30 PM
1

Being violent isn't a natural human disposition, At least at the criminal level. After accounting for poverty based violence, other violence can be written off as either situational or as an aberration. Essentially, telling a rapist not to rape is like telling a cancer patient not to have cancer; mental instability and aberrant violent behavior is much akin to generic mutation, and sometimes it's a result there from. I'd even go so far as to say that if feminists had there way in regards to "tea…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:20 PM
12

You've never seen a feminist rally, have you?
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:32 PM
1

I think it's more relevant to the atheism board. Meh.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 04:35 AM
5

I haven't a clue how a gay man's bullshit job relates to feminism or Men's Rights Activism.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 06:50 AM
1

Ugh, it's people like this that just make me wretch. Summary: I'm all for feminism, totally buy it, believe it, etc. But I'm definitely not a feminist, I don't believe in nouns.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:13 AM
1

As a gay mra myself, I can sympathize with this line of thinking. Modern American women disgust me on a cultural level. It's hard to find a lady that hasn't abused the privileges afforded to them by society, and feminism certainly isn't correcting that behavior. In fact, feminism is dismissive that such an accusation could merit any truth at all, contributing whole heartedly to the brain washing. In order for feminists to throw their philosophical stones, they must perpetuate an aura of a sinles…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 10:49 AM
2

In pure feminist fashion, comments on the article are closed to prevent desenting opinion.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:50 PM
0

Yeah, but it doesn't make you a coward for choosing not to resort to it.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:34 AM
6

So personal ideology is more important than personal safety? Irrationally throwing yourself to the wolves is foolish. Do what you can with the strength you have, to go the level of sacrificing one's own life over ideology is stupid. Self sacrifice is only useful when it is in protection of others.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:02 AM
5

There's nothing wrong with looking out for your own safety. If I have to make a choice between being a coward and being a dead fool, I'll be a coward.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:51 AM
5

It's a news article, not a debate. Men's rights activists have invited feminist leaders to debate, however they declined. Likely for the same reason you're trying to cite. Scroll down through this subreddit and your likely to find some statistics.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:15 AM
-4

I tried to take it seriously, but all that comes to mind is futurama.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:09 AM
2

I dunno, you don't exactly see them crawling out of their Hijabs for all the craziness women have to deal with in the middle-east. You have to understand that one's own understanding of what's socially acceptable frames the context of any form or vector of art. The only reason that realization is apparent is due to social framing of the relationships of men and women. If literally every feature of man was reversed, and the same repeated with women, then the tables turned, in the context you fram…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:01 AM
1

Given the bullshit that's been steaming out of the atheism boards lately, is it any surprise?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:23 AM
5

Police treat everybody like crap. Our justice system makes profit from putting people behind bars. Presuming it were ever possible to make legislation that specifically protects men from certain prosecution, they'd simply move their focus onto greener pastures, so to speak. It's a systematic issue that covers multiple problems within a broken system operated by corrupt individuals, from top-down.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 04:45 PM
2

It's not really all that surprising; feminists certainly enjoy framing men and women up as two very different species, however, this is most certainly a devious thought crime. We're all human, and our differences are few, no matter how much we notice the small details.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 04:42 AM
2

What a cunt.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:23 PM
2

Just let em be and move on. The best stance one can have is one of non-aggression. We don't have to play their games. All we have to do is conduct ourselves as responsible folks with plenty of facts and a good amount of common sense and eventually we'll break through. Character attacks are a sign of weakness, which I think means we might be winning.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:25 AM
3

Ya know, I don't really mind when the tables are turned. I can't tell you just how happy the entire population of the male gender would be if women decided to take the lead, push em down on the bed, fuck with dominance, and do it frequently.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:13 AM
0

Perhaps, but that doesn't go very far in explaining the other half of divorce, that being who gets primary care of children and who gets child support. It's quite obvious that the court system prefers women to men in this.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:53 PM
7

I'd love to see an a day when women can be independent too Beyonce, but I doubt that day will come with modern feminism as it stands today. If you constantly need protection, need special judicial treatment, etc etc, how can you ever expect to truly be equal. Ya know, I think what Beyonce wants is everything men have, and that's not equality. Equal but different. We may not have the save things, talents, jobs, or attributes, but that doesn't mean things aren't fair. They're just different.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter