TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fr-ed_X Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by fr-ed_X on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nothing works if you seem fake.
/r/seduction21/12/20 02:40 PM
1

None of that matters during cold approqching except how you present yourself and how you look. Yes during the first minutes to hours of an interaction, yes. Of he didn't get any from 100 approaches something is seriously wrong. Yeah but there's like several things it could be. If you are good looking and not socially retarded you should get laid at least once per 5 or 10 tops women u approach. As a beginner? That's utopian.
/r/askTRP20/12/20 12:50 PM
4

I kind of agree with both of you. My point is that most actions aren't beta or alpha inherently. Reaching out to an ex is beta or alpha depending on why you do it. Because you haven't had any for 4 months and you're constantly thinking about her? Scarcity. Because you could really take it or leave it and don't care if she laughs at you and uses it as an ego boost? At worst neutral. What she thinks is really irrelevant. That was only my point.
/r/askTRP20/12/20 02:20 AM
19

What do you have to lose by looking like a beta bitch if you are in your core convinced you're not a beta bitch? What the fuck has her impression of you to do with anything? ​ There's only one reason to be afraid of looking like a beta bitch....
/r/askTRP20/12/20 02:09 AM
7

No. In my opinion having an identity, a mission, and the drive to achieve that mission, as well as the results to show for it are the foundation of your attractiveness and value as a man. They're the engine of your car if you will. But you won't get any traction without wheels. Game is the wheels. To be good with women you need an actual abundance mentality. And the only way to get it is to actually experience abundance. Because it's really hard to fake for more than a short time. So I think it'…
/r/askTRP20/12/20 01:56 AM
2

If a girl does not respond to your messages or if she flakes on the first date, she is not genuinely interested. That’s it! You could done everything right. But simply she is not into you but rather hold you to get validation and attention. Everything else is just an excuse. I wouldn't see it so black and white. If she doesn't respond wait a bit (at least 24-48h), then send another text, seriously, even if it's needy. I've been on multiple dates after having "restarted" conversations like this. …
/r/seduction19/12/20 10:04 PM
0

The results are typical and if you did a larger sample you'd still find the average girl will outdo the hottest male but all he's doing is complaining that it's unfair without having actually put in any effort.
/r/seduction19/12/20 09:22 PM
0

It's no secret women get tons of matches easily whereas the average guy doesn't. But what you did is put 0 effort into your profile and expected to stand out from the other thousands of guys a woman can swipe through. Tinder can work but you have to put in effort. How much effort? Depends on how good looking you are. There's people who have written tinder guides so I won't go into detail but you need - Well taken pictures that show you from good angles with good lighting and good image quality. …
/r/seduction19/12/20 09:19 PM
0

Generally good points, but I disagree with some things as they're worded. When presented with two options in your mind, always make the bolder choice (as long as it’s legal and safe). To get out of your comfort zone yes, but calibration is important. Just because it's bold doesn't mean it is automatically the best thing to do. If you’re interested in someone, pursuing sex too quickly makes you look insincere or like a chump. Look for her signals. Build tension. Make it feel like a sex with you i…
/r/seduction19/12/20 01:53 PM
0

Outer game is knowing how to have conversations that are conducive to your goals, how to create attraction, how to frame the relationship, how to isolate, how to escalate, how to pull, how to handle objections etc. Inner game is the self belief that you are good enough, that you have value. It gives you the confidence to pull all this stuff above off and makes it congruent. ​ Outer game is easier to change and can lead to positive experiences that improve your inner game. Inner game makes learni…
/r/seduction05/10/20 08:48 PM
1

"relegating you to only average/easy girls to make yourself feel like you have a better success rate" Tbf thats not a bad beginner strategy. I'm also a fan of Todd but there are parts of his game that are also pretty manipulative. But I agree outer game is a learnable skill.
/r/seduction05/10/20 03:34 PM
2

I think it's less about her looking at you and moor about the context. Is it a bar or a club, you probably don't have to go in direct because if you approach in a place like this it already communicates interest. In the street, at the library, some random situation, direct can have an advantage because it's sort of an unusual situation to hit on someone.
/r/seduction17/09/20 03:33 PM
2

Your question sounds like a clickbait YouTube video title. There's pros and cons to either. If you do direct you have to sell yourself on your appearance and delivery of the opener alone. Your entire approach depends on if she immediately liked your look and if you delivered the opener confidently, your body language etc. She has to make a quick decision on whether or not to talk to you and you get blown out a lot but it can also work really well if she digs your confidence. Indirect openers are…
/r/seduction16/09/20 10:40 PM
1

Don't over think it. Just text her back normally without investing too much time, then meet up with her when she's nearby.
/r/seduction16/09/20 01:19 PM
1

I started off asking about the actual game styles and less about the industry but that is a good point about infield footage, you don't get proof that these interactions actually lead to sex. Things that get reactions or look good on camera aren't necessarily effective. Have you seen some of the Tyler/ Julian infield they used to put in their programs for example. I don't know if you've seen it but is it just me or is it just complete cringe? Another point is how much can you realistically impro…
/r/seduction16/09/20 12:50 PM
2

I don't actually know a lot about UK daygame. But what I'm wondering is if these guys are not who they pretend to be, wouldn't they have been exposed by now? I mean it's not like there aren't guys who are good with women in the pickup scene. Is it just about who is best at marketing? How can they be considered the premier guys in their field unless everyone in the field is garbage? How did they build a reputation when it would have taken just one dude to say hey I went out with this dude and he'…
/r/seduction16/09/20 11:46 AM
2

INTP actually but close haha. Yes, I sometimes suspect at least half of the fun of this for me is the mental masturbation about figuring out female psychology and social dynamics. Yeah I do believe in being a high value person to begin with rather than trying to mimic one. I don't really like canned material although I do like to keep a couple of canned lines ready for when I need them. I just find all the different and conflicting approaches interesting. Of course nothing will work on every gir…
/r/seduction15/09/20 07:21 PM
2

In the history of Pickup there have been different gurus with different philosophies. I imagine you have seen a lot of them. What is your stance on the best stlyle of game for different personalities (introverted vs extroverted for example). I don't have a complete history of pickup and correct me if my summary of these is wrong but there is Mystery which as I understand was pretty scripted and a lot about group sets, very indirect, first disqualifying the girl altogether. Then there was the inv…
/r/seduction15/09/20 03:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter