TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fran55000 Archive

View 2 posts and 25 comments by fran55000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

I hardly disagree with the post. Women can stand out for their different traits, I know a lot of living cases of this
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 02:20 PM
1

Well that's very disrespectful. How did it went, she accepted your decision?or is she trying to contact you like crazy
/r/askTRP20/01/21 02:59 PM
9

Was she clearly monkey branching? I'm genuinely curious, the only red flag I saw is that putting the traces together, the girl was texting a lot to this guy that also complimented her. I don't understand what if someone is doing such attempt of monkey branching, would bluntly confess "yeah we are texting" *Also where I come from it's extremely normal building work-relationships
/r/askTRP20/01/21 02:54 PM
1

Yeah tell me how fatness in Victorian times were considered a good genetic or healthy trait. Or how just a few centuries ago, being extremely pale was considered utmost appealing. Even worse, the anorexy-like fashion that predomined around the 2000s. So yeah, in general beauty can be extremely linked to contextual circumstances (ohh see Louis XVI the apex of royalty and masculinity), hence, it's very subjective. People considered attractive now won't be considered as such in a few decades. An ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 05:09 PM
2

1.-"Beauty" it's an extremely subjective opinion and varies through generations. The women we see nowadays is not the cause of the picky selection from centuries of pillage. You can check how used to look the most beautiful women like Cleopatra and Marie Antoinette (ugly af according to our actual standards) 2.- Genes are transferred to both, boys and girls. Boys don't go walking around looking like Asterix & Obelix while the women is a perfect specimen of our actual time. There is no such a thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 01:29 PM
1

Why not
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/20 04:25 PM
1

I strongly agree with you in a 90%. Nonetheless, ethics (classic) encompasses many things of external factors. For instance, ethics forecast that a beautiful human being (a well proportioned and symmetric one) will be aspired because the beauty it's an end in itself. Along with this, ethics set us to be ready for exceptional cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 01:58 PM
1

Very interesting! I wonder if natural law (I'm guessing you refer to "biological law") really differs from ethics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 11:57 AM
0

You are absolutely incorrect. I asked the opinion about a topic "A", and you came with some "Z" opinion. If you think men are afraid of something and they are hypocrite, it's ok, and it's your personal opinion, but this place is for rational discussion, or that's what I thought. TL;DR:No, your opinion is not too hot, it's pretty much everywhere and nothing new
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 01:39 AM
1

Source?= "Trust me"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 01:29 AM
2

You think bc your nickname you can get into every discussion and state what you believe is right thinking that is polotically incorrect but a "truth" that has to be spoken? Who tf cares of the "performance" of prior couples? You can set some kind of standards, but honestly people is extremely average by definition. The only things you would remember are the ones that escapes the norm, either the worst, or the one that excels. So no, no one in its normal mental health would panic overthinking and…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/20 01:28 AM
1

Elaborate pls
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 09:32 PM
2

Ancient philosophers agreed that ethic wasn't an exact science, they could hardly be labelled as about what's right and good, rather, as the study of human behaviour as its mean to reach happiness, being these behaviours models of conduct, either good or bad examples as such (there you go). In this case, high N count (promiscuity) can be labelled as an act contrary to reason (paraphrasing Aristotle about the lack of will), opposed to the continence as a model of virtue. Following this reasoning,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 05:19 PM
1

That's a serious answer
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 04:26 PM
-1

Why the rage? I don't agree that men are afraid of the dick comparison. Actually, the N count it's related with the forecasted capacity of commitment as a partner
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 04:24 PM
2

Infidelity was just an illustrative example of how the masculine gender tends to be promiscuous, a tendency that maintain in the relationship. If we accept that ethics it's about the "good living" and the capacity to discern the best options that can lead us to the happinesses, we will rapidly agree that N count will have an impact on our lifestyle and mental wealth, for good or bad. Being this true, a comparatively high N count is inevitably related to the lack of self-control, thus, lack of wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 04:21 PM
0

I know that, but talking about other excess is not related to this theme, that's why I brought continence in the specific subject of sexuality. *By the way Aristotle makes something such as a catalogue of the virtues and its opposites. In this case a most fit title would be about promiscuity
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 04:09 PM
1

I'm talking about body count, not betraying. Also I don't justify betraying from any part.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 03:55 PM
2

I think N is the number of sexual partners, while LTR means long term relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 12:25 PM
1

I keep appreciative for your answers. Let me add something interesting. I'm actually from Latin America and I've dated with girls from different countries of the world; and I've always thought that guys from US, western Europe and Scandinavia, that is, equitable societies (which means, total incorporation of women to the labour force, and so, not codependency of the men) had it pretty easy when talking about seduction. For instance, in Latin America you don't get approached by women, you don't s…
/r/askTRP14/11/20 06:38 PM
1

The fact you edited your comment proves my point
/r/askTRP14/11/20 06:06 PM
1

Uhhh the last I want is to get into an empty discussion with a stranger in the internet. Look, there's no need to be ill-bred, specially in a community meant to be for support. The side bar doesn't explain my question, that's why I ask, is that so hard? I just wanted a "neutral" and "genuine" concept summarised, which someone already provided me. About your rhetorical question, "why does everyone wants their own special direct answers...?", feels like a person crying for attention and support wi…
/r/askTRP14/11/20 06:05 PM
1

Wtf, did you read that I stated anyone """willing""" to explain a doubt I had, obviously the side bar is not enough and it is much appreciated an answer for active members of the community, why tf you leave a reply if you are not willing to cooperate? Just keep scrolling somewhere else my toxic fellow
/r/askTRP14/11/20 05:48 PM
1

Insightful, thank you very much for your time. One thing though, I don't see any conflict (rather novelty) in the premise of women being loyals to themselves and what does that implies, like is the most repeated consign in social media, voiced by the same women. Basically surprises me that a huge sector feels offended by the "redpill" attitude, being labelled as misogynistic, while it's a logic counter movement to the blatantly proclaimed self loyalty of women in dispair of men's idealism.
/r/askTRP14/11/20 05:42 PM
1

Who hasn't watch the matrix?
/r/askTRP14/11/20 05:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter