TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

francis_hunter_brosh Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by francis_hunter_brosh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Any chance we can have the links that have nothing to do with rights moved to /mensRants or /mensFeels? There's a near-constant barrage of whining in here that makes us look petty.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 07:33 PM
–

Poe's Law
/r/MensRights09/08/15 01:42 AM
3

hah, that's fair.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 09:20 PM
–

What does this have to do with MensRights? I'm very interested in equanimity, but there was just a post here yesterday where we (men) complained about the same issue, and I rode the downvote train for suggesting it was just whining, which people appear to agree with when it's feminists doing the whining. With all the real problems that exist, it seems more like this stuff belongs in /MensFeels, because it has nothing to do with our rights. Anyhow, bring on the downvotes, that's the mature way we…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 08:07 PM
–

Individuals are allowed to think men are dumb, there's no right that protects you from being offended. Do we really need to whine about everything?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 08:11 PM
–

On a basic level I agree that HeForShe is a ridiculous name for anything to do with equality, in the same way I wouldn't make a SheForHe campaign - however it seems like calling it a "supremacist religion" just seems... not so reasonable. If this was something specific to the US, or the western world, I would be more critical, but as a UN effort... There are huge parts of the world where women really are second-class citizens, and those parts of the world need initiatives that help them, right?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:09 PM
1

I don't disagree.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:29 AM
–

Each individual act? No. Interest in addressing the problem socially? Yeah.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:13 PM
3

In my opinion, it's because 'we' don't represent just one idea or common purpose. We're composed of individuals, nearly 100k just in this subreddit, each with their own idea as to what 'men's rights' means to them personally. In the same way 'women's rights' supporters run the gamut from 'reasonable egalitarian' to 'vengeful gender-supremacist', we attract extremists of our own.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 07:36 PM
–

Absolutely both. We have our best 10% and our worst 10%, just like any group.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:30 PM
6

Hegemony is the word we should all be using, imo.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:30 PM
-1

Hyperbole, I don't think those things are true and I doubt you do either.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:21 PM
-1

Hyperbole isn't helpful, let's be rational instead.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:11 PM
6

If everyone involved is of the proper age of consent and within the laws of whatever country they happen to be in, shouldn't it be fine for adults to do what they like, male or female?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:19 PM
5

Except in many places that's not legally true.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:02 PM
1

It is the responsibility of the person making the claim to demonstrate that (as "poster on reddit" is not a reliable source) they're making claims backed-up by actual science. Asking the reader to personally investigate every baseless claim that appears and hunt-down a reputable source isn't terribly reasonable. Yes, you can google, but without proper (i.e., .edu, etc) sourcing, anyone can make whatever claim they want, and the information you find via google isn't necessarily any more true.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:44 PM
1

This seems to suggest that you're only thinking of women within the United States, as women are most certainly not equal all over the world.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 04:56 PM
7

http://noscript.net/ The internet is so much better with NoScript.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 11:36 PM
1

Unverified outrage cross-post made by someone other than the original author? Wonderful.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:13 PM
–

Feminists aren't just one group, they're individuals. Plenty of them say and do moronic shit, but pretending that's how "all of them" are doesn't help, imo.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:01 PM
3

Not by reasonable people. It's sorta like if the Westboro Baptist Church hates you; they don't represent rational people, they just want to hate.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:52 PM
-1

That's way too reasonable for some of our rabid crowd. Also, yes.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:37 PM
2

Most people think feminism is a harmless thing that just means you want equality, and they instantly assume MRAs are evil sexists. I could be mistaken, but unless you have some source for that information I'm not aware of, it sounds like you're presenting your opinion as fact. "How things are" on tumblr also isn't necessarily relevant to how anything is in real life. I'm of the opinion that the constant barrage of links from tumblr just make us look immature.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:48 PM
–

Can we be done posting bullshit from tumblr yet? People post stupid shit there, a lot. We know.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:34 PM
–

You /do/ get to decide, but that doesn't mean society will agree with you. Some decisions will put you at odds with bullies, and to some degree you simply have to deal with it, as bullying (especially among children) is just part of the animal dominance game.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 07:34 PM
1

There's no such thing as bad publicity. If they get the whole 'story' and form their whole opinion based on an SNL sketch, they weren't a supporter you should worry about having. If they saw the sketch and then came to learn more, show them you're better than that.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:55 PM
1

Regarding 'who are the reasonable feminists', I don't have any organizations or groups in mind, just people living their lives. The best example I can think of off the top of my head would probably be women in India, that deal with a lot of women-specific issues, but really anywhere women happen to be discriminated against. I believe you when you say that NOW is mainstream, and I wouldn't be surprised if additional reading lead me to believe that they do indeed hold some extremist views, I just …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:40 AM
–

No, I don't think the reasonable people from either group are opposed to the equal rights of the other. Looked up NOW, not familiar with their policies or actions beyond this few minutes of looking, so... I guess, possibly?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:16 PM
–

Not really, in the same way that I don't think MRAs as a group are opposed to the idea of women having equal rights. There are extremists on both sides pushing an agenda of their own, but I like to hope that the moderates are just egalitarians trying to solve different problems from different perspectives.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:31 PM
–

There's a great deal of information there, and having looked through a bit of it, it looks reasonable enough. I don't think that necessarily implies a 'lack of individuality' on the part of radical feminists as much as 'gullibility' or 'misguided fervor'. All I mean by 'people are individuals' is that there are examples out there of both men and women treating each other terribly, but that I don't think judging the rest of us (male or female) collectively is fair or helpful.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:51 PM
–

Sources from 1997, 2006, 2007 - It seems like you're reaching to construct a narrative.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 07:11 AM
–

That's the same argument they use against MRAs, don't be lazy, people are individuals.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 06:46 AM
1

If this is a problem worth your time, you've got it pretty good; stop wearing pajamas to school.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 10:17 AM
2

First, how do you know what she does with the money? Second, how much is objectively 'enough' or 'too much' to pay for your child? Take how much she may make out of the equation. Sorry to be skeptical if it isn't appreciated, I'm just attempting to make sure this isn't outrage fodder.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:15 AM
2

Fair enough. There's nothing there that implies it couldn't be a female/female relationship, but I understand it's easy to see it as a slight.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 11:05 PM
-8

It seems more than a little presumptuous to decide what "they" mean.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:41 AM
7

Wait... you mean people say ridiculous shit on tumblr and/or the internet?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 12:34 AM
-1

Man, precisely.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 08:56 PM
-7

This is exaggeration as compared to every experience I've personally had or witnessed. I think it's always ok for men to discuss men's issues, just like I think it's always ok for women to discuss women's issues. There's a men-only barber shop in the town I live in, I know this because I asked them if they'd be able to cut my girlfriend's hair, because I appreciated their level of service, and they told me they didn't have anyone that would be able to do it. I don't have any problem with this, I…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 02:24 AM
-20

Oh, whoops, sorry circle-jerkers, I meant ALL WOMEN ARE EVIL or something.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:51 AM
-27

Hyperbole doesn't help anyone, but then I doubt you're trying to be helpful.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:53 PM
-8

Read the comment explaining that nothing was done during October so they combined events before you add any additional impotent rage. This sort of hollow whining is a big part of why MRAs get a bad rap, imo, because lots of you are just whiners.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 11:51 PM
-10

Quick I made up some content, or caught people acting like assholes on the internet (which they normally never do!). OUTRAGE!
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:28 PM
-1

No part of that stops you from 'hating them in return'.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 10:34 PM
1

With all the legitimate problems out there, maybe implied video game rape? Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:03 PM
-1

and when they disagree?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:15 PM
0

Finally I found the guy that gets to decide how people should feel.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:11 PM
0

It's not ok to smoke near your own kids, we just can't stop parents from doing it. Don't try to make it a gender issue, it isn't.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:37 PM
–

"They do it too" is not a good excuse.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:38 AM
1

The (legal) definition of the term as it relates to the crime, in this specific case the UK was referenced, as Macs use the Oxford (UK-based) dictionary. The US (legal) definition is different in ways I hadn't expected (penetration only).
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:27 PM
2

That's an interesting delineation, I had no idea - thanks.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:19 PM
–

No, not 'the forcing of sexual intercourse', because that's not what 'rape' means in this context. I understand that's what a lot of men would prefer that it meant, but at present, it doesn't.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 07:31 PM
–

This is the non-alarmist not-overreacting comment I was hoping to find.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:59 PM
10

That red text says 'teen parents' and cites a specific statistic (though "don't marry each other" isn't the same as "don't raise a child together"). What's the problem with this?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:01 PM
13

Thanks, a thousand times this.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:54 PM
–

Not presenting an argument, accusing you of being a crazy.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:39 PM
–

"gynocentric war"? Are you some sort of goddamn crazy?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:20 PM
2

Not if she was actually asleep, which I'm not claiming to know one way or the other. All the same, that seems like 'reasonable doubt' to me.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:18 PM
-1

This just in, girls have cooties. Really, if you're mad about this, your priorities are not reasonable.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:07 AM
1

So, you're upset that there's a gender-specific word for Male crime but also upset that there isn't a gender-specific word for Female crime? I don't think the penalties for men should be any different, I don't think that women should receive any variety of special treatment, but I also don't buy this bullshit that we absolutely must use the word rape, because it's just semantic.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:54 PM
-11

It's just a word, they can have words for crimes only women can commit, too. The world has real differences in it.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 08:52 PM
-19

Turns out if you commit a crime with your penis, women can't commit that crime. Is there some reason we're supposed to be upset about this? There really are things men can do that women can't.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:36 PM
1

They are men's issues; they're not exclusively men's issues, but there is information specifically relevant to men. This seems like baseless whining mixed with the desire to feel persecuted. Bring on the downvotes.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:20 PM
0

"Token sympathy"? The military is better than that; perhaps not by much, but there's victim support, public attention, and anger towards the attacker when the victim is male as well. There are plenty of good arguments to make here, hyperbole just muddies the waters.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:29 PM
2

This is an extremely accurate picture imo, but try to bear in mind that there are over sixty eight thousand users, and that whiners tend to be a lot more vocal than reasonable people.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:52 PM
1

Well, if they're actually equal, isn't it? Sorta by definition? I know this may seem overly semantic, but isn't it just that in practice they're (typically) not actually equal, or am I mistaken?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:47 AM
2

If this is real I will eat my hat.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:47 PM
1

Not entirely. Practical example I'm aware of being an old lady that wants to run a home business and employ assistants, she can choose to employ only women until she has (some number) of employees, at which point she's subject to additional regulation. Additionally, things may be different outside California.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:08 AM
8

If it's a business with less than (I don't remember the exact number) employees, they're legally allowed to make that delineation. If it's a large business, follow the above advice.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:40 PM
0

Pretty much. Fight back against the omega-whiners, they're considerably more numerous.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 10:53 PM
-24

Help Help I'm being oppressed, women are making anti-men jokes and I can't handle it! For fucks sake. [edit: I would like to add, eat my balls downvoters, get over yourselves]
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:46 PM
5

Wow, now you're really overreacting. Go have a nap.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:43 AM
0

"Pretending to be a lawyer"? You're kind of an asshole, aren't you?
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:32 PM
6

I almost entirely agree with you, but "a very careful PR game"? That seems dishonest. /MR doesn't have to be high-gloss imo - can't we just be ourselves? Sometimes via honesty people say shitty things, but that's often where opportunities for improvement arise.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:10 PM
2

I disagree, there's the same amount of "wiggle room" in both statements, one is just considered socially acceptable and the other isn't.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 04:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter