~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adèle Mercier, Queens University: Feminist Rape apologistI request that the mods remove this entire conversation as it involves libelous accusations which may expose this sub to litigation. You have to prove that any libel has taken place, first. But don't worry I've taken a screenshot of this conversation and it'll be up on my blog. Censorship is for those without arguments. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 03:46 AM |
| 1 | Adèle Mercier, Queens University: Feminist Rape apologistFirst tell me what "villainous speech" is Did you look the words up? avfm dude (feel free to deny you're an avfm shill) If you're going to call me names, at least choose accurate ones. In what way have I promoted AVFM? Just as disagreement is not an attack, agreement with one individual is not the promotion of her affiliations. Or whatever bullshit. Aptly said. Your simile fails for the following reason. You appear to believe that disagreement is "an attack." We've already handled that one. Firs… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 03:05 AM |
| 1 | Professor Adèle Mercier: It Wasn’t Rape, He Was Asking For It? @queensjournal"Bitch" may be a low-brow insult, but it is not "hate speech". Hate speech, at least until until it was repealed from Canadian law, was defined as "speech designed to incite to violence." | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 02:37 AM |
| 1 | Adèle Mercier, Queens University: Feminist Rape apologistAnd how exactly does a third-party's post regarding another's in any way affect an unrelated website? Note, also that I have made no conclusions, but merely a summary. Now, if you want fruitful conversation, feel free to tell me exactly why you disagree with my summary, how it could be improved? What is it, exactly that you disagree with? Who knows, you might change my mind. As for being condescending or a demagogue, both which are false, what does this have to do with the matter of my post? Why… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 02:26 AM |
| 1 | Adèle Mercier, Queens University: Feminist Rape apologistYou do not appear to understand the sense of the word "censor". Please see: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/censor I am not vilifying her speech, I am merely exposing villainous speech. Here's the deal. An adult can say anything they want. This does not, however, mean that such words are free of the consequence of other people speaking back. Have you taken the time to read her words? If you disagree with my summary of what she's said, in what manner? How would you correct it? | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 01:53 AM |
| 5 | Adèle Mercier, Queens University: Feminist Rape apologistPlease be very careful with your choice of words. In what manner was she "attacked?" Search term: "define attack" Result: "an aggressive and violent action against a person or place." Can you present me one instance of an aggressive and violent action taken against her? Certainly not in my post, you cannot. Please read what I've said carefully. I said that the rest of your comment was speculation and an expression of sentiments not pertinent to the discussion. The discussion is the matter of my … | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 01:37 AM |
| 2 | Adèle Mercier, Queens University: Feminist Rape apologistFirst, this is not an "attack". She chose to speak publicly, she used her full name, announced herself as a Professor of Philosophy of 20 years with Queen's University, and as a Feminist. She chose to speak in those two capacities simultaneously. She's an adult, and adults that choose speak publicly, are as accountable for their words as they are their deeds. She then chose to write publicly, using her full name to make such absurd claims. She does have the right to free speech, and as you can s… | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 12:42 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter