TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

freakydeku Archive

View 0 posts and 121 comments by freakydeku on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

cheating is never a private matter lmao why should she cover for him? i think i know what it is. you wish you could cheat on ppl
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:40 AM
1

you desperately trying to change the subject is so funny 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 12:39 AM
1

you’re such a victim….of robbery by cardi b? lol if he didn’t take her seriously… why did he bring her around his family and date her for a year? why did he behave as if he was taking her seriously? that’s goofy af. he cheated on her, there’s really no reason to doubt that happened. you’re just trying to excuse it by saying “she deserves to be cheated on and treated poorly bc she embraces her sexuality & beauty which i don’t like”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 09:58 PM
1

try to remain in reality
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 09:48 PM
1

alexa play pretty and petty 🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 03:37 PM
1

oof now you’re copying me? embarassing. siri add “unoriginal” to the list of male traits
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 03:15 PM
1

mmm nope, not remotely.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 11:05 AM
1

there are no beauty standards for men
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:42 AM
1

a flaw which women don’t have
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:41 AM
0

you’re not fooling anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:23 AM
0

lmao yall want to be women so bad. men do not have beauty standards
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:22 AM
1

you’re conflating having flaws with being shallow. totally different things. women simply aren’t shallow
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 07:21 AM
1

do you need this actually spelled out for you? women can be shallow, men can be shallow. wanting to be with someone you find attractive is not shallow, on its own. purely valuing looks & superficial relationships is shallow. this describes men. not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 04:30 AM
1

wanting your romantic partner to be attractive to you is not “shallow”. unlike men, women care about & consider way more variables than just physical appearance. they’re much less shallow than men, not only in what they look for in a person but in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 03:54 AM
2

same guys calling margot robbie mid lmao meanwhile angelina jolie dated billie bob fucking thorton
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 01:15 AM
3

how am i lost in the sauce? i’m engaging with reality. you’re projecting your own shit, which is divorced from it. you lost in ur own sauce dummy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 12:09 AM
2

more words for you’ve never engaged with feminism in your life
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:47 PM
3

she defined what pick me is - how is that acting abnormal?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:47 PM
2

pushing back on the idea that you must “be his peace” is not the same as promoting chaos and terror lmfao where is society going when men are literally arguing women shouldn’t vote and need to “be men’s peace”? that’s something you think women should be ok with? right
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:46 PM
0

no, the comment is not warranted. you plainly know nothing about feminism and just hate it because “fem” is in the word lmaoooo
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:12 PM
3

but he can make up for it, is the point. men have way more avenues towards attracting a woman bc women have flexible standards and many more variables to their attraction. men are not giving a chance to a woman they aren’t initially attracted to. women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:11 PM
1

that changes nothing… pink pilled defined what being a pick me is. the “no pill” guy tried to force that into a weird dichotomy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:10 PM
2

i think it’s hilarious that you think if women speak against something, that means it must be invalid. men are also not called simps for being with women who they think are attractive enough. they’re called simps for simply being in loving relationships. buy your wife some flowers? simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 11:07 PM
2

no actually this is how it works. women must be attractive in face & body (especially body imo) men can have some variety of traits; they don’t have to have all of them and there’s no single one they must have. if you aren’t very attractive you can be rich or funny or good in bed or talented. no other feature of a woman can make up for not being attractive. being rich will not make up for it, being funny will not make up for it, being good in bed or talented will not make up for it being agreeab…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:48 PM
-1

nah men want to be stressed out
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:43 PM
8

are those the two options?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:41 PM
11

because that’s how they define simps 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:40 PM
9

i also love the “as long as she looks good enough” women are so shallow amirite
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:40 PM
0

do you have evidence for that? IPV is the most common form of gender based violence. the reality is that “unselected” men have significantly LESS OPPORTUNITY to engage in violence towards women. you literally have to at least be in proximity of them to enact violence against them. if a woman won’t let you into her house, how are you going to attack her? and the minute she lets you into her house, you are now “selected” no? so that means the only time “unselected” men are able to attack women is …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:27 PM
3

you lose the ability to have a healthy relationship, period. among other things you deprive yourself of. but you especially lose opportunities for initial attraction. men become abusive later in the relationship, dropping the mask, after they’ve successfully hooked a woman. they don’t woo a woman with abuse. do you actually think that’s how it works? treating women as human beings is a baseline requirement. no matter what else you do, no matter what you look like, you will not get play if you ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:24 PM
0

they don’t have opportunity for the action lmao, what are you not getting here? you cannot commit IPV if you aren’t in a relationship. therefore; the datapoint you’re trying to gesture to “rates of IPV by incels” simply does not, and cannot, exist. you’re basically saying “see, we’re not violent bc they didn’t study how violent we are” lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 10:19 PM
1

it is relevant to dating success. if you don’t see women as people you lose many, many, opportunities. ofc your life experience is also much more narrow & less rich as well
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:03 PM
1

evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 09:02 PM
1

yes i don’t want to. are you able to accept that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 06:31 PM
1

i’m not interested in reading your paragraphs
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:46 PM
3

no… i didn’t say that. i wish yall would engage w some intellectual honesty but you can’t so it’s ok
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:45 PM
-1

did you read anything else that i said to you bud? or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:49 AM
0

how is what you said a response to me
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:49 AM
5

so you… started looking healthy and attractive? this is not news. this is not redpill. fatchicks are treated as subhuman by men as well - by society as a whole actually. yall are very attached to your very stupid misogyny
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:47 AM
-1

I did explain it to you, you just refuse to acknowledge what i’m telling you because you’re looking for instant gratification instead of actual personal growth i never called the advice “fake” i said it’s not the sole thing you’re told. if i had any question on whether or not it was, that’s all gone now since you clearly just are not capable of listening. good luck dude
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:44 AM
-3

what?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:43 AM
–

tf are you even talking about? every man in a relationship is with a woman who actually desires him and the vast majority of them are average.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:43 AM
2

incrls aren’t countered in the study bc they don’t have intimate partners. so the study says absolutely nothing about incels level of violence towards women. we can clearly see they have extremely violent rhetoric toward women generally that “chads” don’t have or at least done express.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 04:36 AM
1

tf are you talking about? heterosexual women accept homosexual and bisexual men… are you saying that heterosexual men are ok with their women being bi? yeah, they are sexualizing her sexuality. they often… want to see her sleep with other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 04:26 AM
2

what is a succubus pilled man
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 04:20 AM
5

if we want to fix the birthrate i think we also need to talk about/unpack how mothers are treated. in general, society is creeping towards being disdainful of mothers and children. it has also for quite a long time shamed single mothers. it used to at least also shame deadbeat fathers, but atp the single mothers are also told they’re to blame for the deadbeats. they should’ve “chose better” and now they are “low value” right? if this is the messaging we send to women, then outside of the financi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 04:18 AM
-1

splitting self improvement and attraction makes perfect sense… to anyone who is focused on self improvement. your growth will always be warped if it’s driven with a specific aim to attract someone. you will not grow into your natural atttactive form. you will always feel insecure bc your allegiance has never been to yourself, but to an aim. you will always be performing, transacting. that’s not what relationships are built on. i’m really trying to help you to understand that you don’t actually u…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 03:52 AM
2

because women do base it on deeper things like character. that’s what yall are not hearing. idk why it’s not clicking to you. women will date men who are hitting, or even slightly below, their absolute minimum metrics on attractiveness, income, etc if they are decent guys that engage them in genuinely interesting conversation, make them laugh, and make them come. if the connection is there, women will sacrifice a lot of their more “shallow” preferences. they will absolutely consider men they oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 03:47 AM
0

i mean, if the response by men to a woman being cheated on is “well he’s rich what should she expect” or “women deceive themselves that’s her fault”… why should women trust men?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 03:15 AM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 03:02 AM
1

oops it seems like you can’t read. i very clearly said i wasn’t going to read. you also lack pretty basic reasoning skills
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 03:02 AM
-3

doesn’t hurt who? men? to be deadbeats?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 03:01 AM
3

yeah, these hyper specifics are useless & unnecessary. “maintain your hairline or have a beard” absolutely groundbreaking shit man. this is basic advice on looking attractive to the opposite sex. imagine if women were “black pilled” and the advice was; wear a sundress and have long hair. men will put up with anything if you wear a sundress and have long hair” lol “women are money focused and statistically date up”. this is plainly false. the majority of women date within the same socioeconomic c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 02:57 AM
–

literally opposite day babe. men are not expected to even be functioning adults & rely on their gfs and wives to do basic household tasks. men, especially red pill men, see women as sex objects to be manipulated into giving them what they want. as “hypergamous foids”. they don’t see them as human beings they can have meaningful relationships with. they see them as a sex dispenser or mommy wife maid. the term “friend zone” highlights this pretty well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 02:43 AM
0

“be nice and wait” has never been given as serious advice literally ever. “be yourself” only works if you have true confidence in who you are, which is built off self trust and self love, which themselves all have positive side effects. “be yourself” as it refers to advice, is to apply a filter to who you attract. so that you can be sure that the people you attract are also attracted to you. the real you this obviously isn’t going to work if you have zero social skills, seeping disdain or predat…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 02:29 AM
1

lol still going. babe if you can’t send your point in two sentences it’s not getting read. im not reading essays.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:16 AM
–

ok…it doesn’t sound like you “might” be full of shit, it seems like you simply… are. you’re just typing misogynistic musings on the internet with no evidence whatsoever? like why is this even your “guess?”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:15 AM
3

I’m not even understanding how this is a reply to what i’ve said. seems like you’re just continuing a conversation with yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:13 AM
4

financial realities become more of a pressing issue as you get older, for sure. being financially stable at baseline is important for both genders, though, unless there’s a sugar bay situation going on. as long as you are regular amounts of financially stable i don’t think you’d struggle to find a 30y woman. ofc offering a amazingly easy lifestyle is going to give you a leg up, all else being equal. but it’s still has to weigh out at the end of the day & the heart does still want what it wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:51 PM
10

how is that red pill? no one on either end of the spectrum says being unhealthy and unemployed is good for your dating prospects
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:46 PM
-13

that seems to be something men struggle with
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:44 PM
–

yeah i’d like you to cite your sources that found most pit bull attacks are from female owners, & also drew align with difference of training strategies. these can be separate papers if need be
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:43 PM
1

i mean, there are no facts have
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:39 PM
1

yeah bb, i can’t read. par for the course w yall tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:39 PM
1

right… but you’re defending it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 11:02 PM
1

babe that doesn’t prove anything except that you were a scumbag & someone either loved you enough to try to make it work in spite of that or was too insecure to stand up for themselves. or both. that doesn’t make you valuable… it makes you a scumbag. not reading beyond that one reply either. i am just now realizing you’re a fucking essay bandit. lay off the addys or get a substack cause no one’s reading all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:59 PM
1

no i don’t believe that either bud
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:58 PM
2

holy shit i am not reading your essay. cope harder better
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:19 PM
1

girl tf are you talking about? do you see me defending a domestic abuser here? do you see me saying that victims of domestic abuse are probably the problem? no babe. but we do see you defending cheating & arguing that bc other men also cheated on her that she’s the problem. when really all we have proof of is shitty ass men
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 10:18 PM
1

women don’t defend & support cheating so, we’re more then men that’s fs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:59 PM
1

no you definitely don’t if you think that personal values don’t impact sexual & relationship value. being adored by (& manipulating) insecure women really proves nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:56 PM
2

lol meg is a globally popular music star. basketbal does not nearly have as much widespread appeal, even in the US where it’s the most popular. the reality is that you have to actively be interested in US basketball to even possibly know who klay thompson is. you can be introduced to MtS completely passively. music is way way more widespread in the culture. she plainly has much more celebrity and reach
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:53 PM
2

it informs it absolutely. y’all really do not understand women
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:33 PM
0

yeah, you found redpill bc you weren’t able to get a gf, (or probably just laid, right?) but that doesn’t mean redpill is somehow the answer. if i’m sick and i go looking for a solution, if someone’s selling some weird concoction i might take it, depending on how sick and desperate i am. but that doesn’t mean it’s actually a cure. redpill just makes you sicker. even if you are able to get a gf using manipulative tactics, you’ll never actually have a meaningful relationship bc your mind is poison…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:29 PM
1

atp i’m pretty sure “RP” men just genuinely see women as commodities so can’t fathom that’s not how other see romantic partners and it makes sense because most RP don’t get any play. that’s what leads them to the ideology. now the question is, do they not have meaningful relationships bc they see humans as commodities or do they see humans as commodities bc they dont have meaningful relationships and essentially are left to covet a bunch of data points
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:23 PM
1

lmao no tf they don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:21 PM
1

breaking news: men ain’t shit
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:21 PM
1

confused how the women being the side chick are worse here lmaooo
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:19 PM
1

if he wanted to smash other women why be taken? cause he was a coward baby who needed the comfort of a gf, too?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:17 PM
3

meg has dated other dudes that were on her level or lower. your belief system is warped bud meg can easily go down the street and find a man hotter than klay. wtf are you even talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:14 PM
5

yes very male centric, and specifically sports fan men. simply put; all of the guys i know, know who meghan thee stallion is. none of the girls i knew could’ve told me who klay thompson was before he got with her. she obviously is more famous
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:12 PM
2

it massively detracts from his value
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:10 PM
3

they aren’t 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:10 PM
1

you keep acting like beyoncé is staying bc of jay zs status… she’s staying because he’s the father of her children lmao. the same as it is for many women, that are married to men with even lower status than themselves it’s amazing to me that everything is so clinically transactional w yall that you don’t even consider this very obvious variable
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:06 PM
1

basketball players are a dime a dozen. jay z is one of the most successful men in music, yes… but he is also the father of beys children. not even remotely comparable situations
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 09:04 PM
-13

I mean, if you’re not voting for Harris/Walz then I don’t see how women’s rights can be at the top of your concerns. like this post is saying that the Dems are losing male voters because they aren’t catering to them…when this is an election where if you cared about womens autonomy you would be voting Dem. ergo, the men “lost” here are fundamentally not allies
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 12:42 AM
1

what is the lesson, exactly?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 12:22 AM
-24

i think it’s concerning that y’all want men’s issues to be considered but won’t show out for women’s bodily autonomy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 12:19 AM
1

dude we both know you’re talking in circles & backtracking because you have no solid defensible stance but you lack humility and cannot express it so you project it
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:58 PM
1

this you? “What evidence are you talking about? The judges ruling isn't evidence. Are you slow? Also, you haven't provided any evidence about the roles because there is none you've basically admitted as much.”
/r/MensRights17/09/22 05:04 PM
1

you have admitted there’s no evidence lol. you know you can’t gaslight people when it’s all in writing, right? telling someone on the internet to stop replying to you is insanely childish lol are you an adult? if you are then you can manage to stop replying yourself or use the block button at your disposal.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 08:07 PM
1

dude lol you’re having a tantrum. this is the internet. if you don’t wanna chat you’re welcome to move along. maybe you can gain some of that “humility” you value so much :) i’m not making anything up. you’re defending the jury verdict even tho you’ve admitted there’s no evidence because “that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen” which is absolutely absurd. pretty sure if a man went to jail for beating his wife without any evidence at all because the jury decided that not having evidence “doesn’t mean…
/r/MensRights16/09/22 06:32 PM
1

you said that when you said he didn’t have any evidence but youre gonna defend the jury verdict anyway. pretty sure i didn’t start this convo with you to begin with. you decided to start replying to me so maybe you should move along
/r/MensRights16/09/22 06:12 PM
1

lol ok well if you think juries should rule however they want regardless of evidence i guess that’s on you
/r/MensRights16/09/22 05:56 PM
1

if you choose not to examine the evidence than why are you arguing with someone who has? do you understand how ridiculous you sound? i watched the entire trial. JD has literally run a propaganda campaign on Amber since 2017/2018 with his lawyer, Waldman, who has run other similar propaganda campaigns for Russia.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 05:51 PM
1

JD has lost this case once, and partially won this case once. if you decide to just accept the outcome of the one he partially won, the one that was specifically ran like a circus & was decided by a jury, but refuse to learn about the judgment he fully lost and why he lost it…you’re the one who’s biased…& also lazy. if you can’t be bothered to sort out the truth for yourself, but decide to be vocal about your half-baked opinion, then you’re just allowing yourself to be someone’s useful idiot.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 05:39 PM
1

the onus of proof is on JD. He’s the one bringing the lawsuit. He doesn’t have any proof. In fact, the only roles he lost are very clearly tied to other incidents. FB = is Fantastic Beast. The only role there’s any proof of him losing. and did he lose it after the accusations first came out? No. Did he lose it after he released a statement saying amber never made false accusations? No. Did he lose it after the sun called him a wife beater? Nope! How bout after amber published her Op-Ed? Also No!…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:03 AM
1

the simple point is there is NO EVIDENCE that he lost any roles at all due to these allegations. none. AND there’s a lot of evidence that points to networks being sick of working with him before the allegations even happened. so saying that “amber heard successfully was able to deny him movie roles” is fantasy. if that was true he would’ve been dropped from FB and blacklisted when the allegations came out in 2016 but he wasn’t
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:39 AM
1

there’s no proof that he lost any jobs due to amber. its not surprising that an old, difficult to work with, uninsurable, occasionally violent actor who had incredibly high demands for salary in general yet only produced box-office disappointments the last 5-10 years of his career would see a slowdown in work. nevertheless, he was offered jobs & took jobs during this time. the only job that he “lost” was fantastic beasts after he lost in the UK.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:17 PM
1

what movie roles did Amber Heard successfully deny JD by the presumption of guilt? trick question; the answer is none. in 2016 when the divorce was finalized they released a joint statement saying no one made false accusations johnny didn’t lose any jobs over this. he was never set to make another POTC, he didn’t want to at that time & it’s never in the works. disney made it clear they were sick of working with him before the divorce even happened, & they announced he wouldn’t be apart of any fu…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:32 PM
1

… what? so what about when one parent is SAH and the other works? if there’s a divorce the SAHP who has devoted their entire life to the children should…lose custody? this is a really strangely classist take, too. it’s like if you want kids you could just knock up a poor woman and then divorce her
/r/MensRights30/05/22 03:50 AM
1

can you help me understand how it’s a profitability machine?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 03:49 AM
1

So you just said that even a high quality woman is considered replaceable .. but men have it bad? lol k
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 12:32 AM
1

If they do, I’m sure they’re not as big as yours
/r/askMRP29/02/20 03:19 AM
0

So, because women are placing more importance on being self sufficient and finding meaningful work, that means they have no interest in being good partners? Women are still socialized to be caretakers, and aspire to marriage. They’re just also now being encouraged to find meaningful work & get an education. I think the amount of women who primarily care about money/status/and “meaningless titles” aschewing all other relationships and/or treating people like trash are probably about the same as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 11:46 PM
1

Depends on the woman &a the guy. There are also lots of men who feels the same & many who downright don’t go down on women so
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 09:42 PM
0

This isn’t true for me
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 09:20 PM
2

Sorry, but I keep hearing the point of TRP is to NOT have a significant other
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 09:11 PM
1

Ok, well in my experience, 80% of the women I've slept with have been fully engaged and reciprocal. & most of my female friends like to bang/ have a healthy sex drive. The only time I've experienced a woman "star fishing" was when she was actually really anxious about other things, we stopped having sex then and talked about what was going on, and had better sex a few days later. If your girls not engaged you should probably find out why. Also, working with women to better understand their bodie…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 07:49 PM
1

In what, porn? Do you personally starfish is the question? Or do you think you’re the only woman who is engaged during sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 07:05 PM
1

Yea I watched your video. It seems like you have a very warped idea of women. Are you a starfish? Are you not engaged when you’re having sex? If you’re viewing sex as a performance that may be why you’re not enjoying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 06:48 PM
1

The average women isn’t looking to marry for money either. Tbh from your post history, your either an extremely misogynistic and downtrodden man or a women struggling with A LOT of self hate. Seeing the world the way that you do is unhealthy. Life is full of nuance, but you choose to believe things that aren’t true, I think probably because they hurt you, so you think they’re true. Regardless, from your description of sex I don’t think you’ve ever had sex with a woman. It sounds like you’re just…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 05:35 PM
1

That’s just not true. Idk where you’re getting that from
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 05:22 PM
1

I really think a much larger sect of the lady & guy population is healthier than you’re saying. Otherwise I somewhat agree & think that huffy thing is a succinct observation. I wonder where it comes from?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:50 AM
1

I think this is super healthy and understandable. I’m just wondering though- if you’re super happy on your own, why stop being the nice guy that you are?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:42 AM
1

There are tons of women dating unemployed/poor men. Taking care of them financially even! The money hungry thing is just such a weird caricature of women. If most women “provide terrible sex” than why do you guys want so much of it? So that some of it is good? What makes most of it terrible?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:39 AM
1

If most women “provide terrible sex” why would you even want it so much ?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:34 AM
2

Yes! & when they do that, the women will arrive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:33 AM
2

Do you ever think that maybe before you seemed desperate and now your seem more laid back, and that’s what they’re attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:26 AM
2

That last one pisses me off so much idk why girls think it’s funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:16 AM
1

As a woman, I understand somewhat where you guys are coming from. Obviously, you want to do what works. I don’t try to hit on women so I really can’t speak to that experience. But I can say that I’ve personally dumped 2 dudes for criminal behavior and am actively turned off by douche behavior. I’d say of all my girlfriends only a quarter of them are specifically attracted to douches, and the rest of us consider that shit taste in men. Almost all of the dudes my friends &a I have or are sleeping …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 04:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter