TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fredinoz Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by fredinoz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Agreed! For way too long men have been brainwashed into believing that having mutilated genitals is good, it's a subject we shouldn't talk about, and to 'toughen up.' And precisely because historically it hasn't been an acceptable subject to discuss openly, the abhorrent practice continues unabated. It's not that easy to 'move on,' or 'get over it,' because we have to look at the mutilation and deal with it every single day, every single time we go to the toilet, take a shower or change our clot…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:18 AM
1

@ExploreInternal6960 - You're effectively saying that it's neither rape nor mutilation. I won't debate the definition of rape, but I would like to provide you with the definition of mutilation. Merriam Webster defines mutilation as 1: an act or instance of destroying, removing or severely damaging a limb or any other body part of a person or animal, or 2: an act or instance of damaging or altering something radically. So, given that the prepuce (i.e. body part) is amputated (i.e. removed), thus …
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:49 AM
1

Yep, years ago I heard a urologist bragging he was doing 4 or 5 during his lunch-hour for extra income.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:38 AM
3

Pure logic. It's a well-established fact that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the male body. It is densely packed with highly specialised nerves - some estimates go up to 20,000. Prove it for yourself by asking an intact man if his foreskin is sensitive! Foreskin amputation (aka circumcision) cuts all of those nerves away. Every. Single. Time. You're left with a glans, which has fewer and different nerve-endings, but now it's permanently exposed so it'll dry out and become less sensit…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:34 AM
6

Wrong. In English speaking nations it was introduced to stop masturbation, so it's designed to cripple sexual functionality and reduce sensitivity as much as possible. Supposedly to cure a huge range of diseases, which were believed to be caused by masturbation. When that was proved to be BS, the pro-cutters started to come up with all sorts of 'medical' reasons to continue, because they were making so much profit from it. ALL of these 'reasons' have been proved to be nonsense. There are NO reas…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:10 AM
7

Circumcision is just a nice little euphemistic name to make it sound less dramatic. It's real proper surgical practice name is "Genital Reduction Surgery."
/r/MensRights03/05/22 02:05 AM
1

The World Health Organisation lists at least 4 different types of FGM. The one you describe is at the most serious end of the scale. The other end starts with a pin-prick to draw a drop of blood. There's a whole range inbetween, about half of which are way less severe and invasive than MGM. So if a pin-prick in a girl's genitals is considered a heinous crime (as it should be!), Then how can the amputation of around what will become 15 square inches of extremely sensitive and specialised penile s…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 12:14 AM
2

You're right. And we also know that the style of cutting practiced by the English speaking nations was designed specifically - and only - to cripple sexual function and reduce sensitivity, to stop masturbation and 'impure thoughts'. That's the beginning and end of it. Everything else is made up along the way to allow the medical profession to avoid having to admit they are wrong, and to keep the huge revenue stream running.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 08:33 AM
5

Nobody but you is saying that cut men should be suicidal. You're twisting what people say and putting words in their mouths. It's a form of gaslighting. And no, it's not comical at all. It's really rather tragic that because you're fine with your cutting, you insist everyone else should be fine with theirs. It's called cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 10:25 AM
3

I was subjected to genital reduction surgery (aka circumcision) as an infant. I'm not happy about that - I resent the fact that my parents chose my sex life - and that of my wife. I spoke to them about it. They got very angry that I challenged their decision and they haven't spoken to me since. Sad, because in making that choice, they've lost contact with me, my wife and their grandchildren. So yes, we are estranged - but it came from their side, not mine. Btw, I know of a number of other men wh…
/r/MensRights11/11/21 09:59 AM
11

No. But they all have a right to be extremely angry. They also have a right to seek answers - and support.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 07:51 AM
8

2 main reasons : 1. Most men don't ever discover the full extent of the loss and mutilation, so they remain blissfully unaware. 2. Cognitive dissonance kicks in, making it really difficult to admit you're damaged. That's where so many men say "I'm cut and I'm fine." Men are generally taught from an early age to suck it up and say nothing. But many more men are discovering what was done to them - and are seriously angry. Some also become suicidal.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 07:49 AM
10

Genital mutilation is sick. I was mutilated as an infant and it's left me with a whole lifetime of physical, sexual and psychological problems. My issues will end the day I die all because my parents just went with the flow, didn't give it more than one second of thought, and just allowed it to happen. 'Everyone was doing it.' 'It was the done thing.' Sick and insane. It says a lot about what we like to call "civilization." My only sin was that I was born a boy. My sister was protected by law, s…
/r/MensRights08/11/21 03:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter