TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

freejosephk Archive

View 0 posts and 270 comments by freejosephk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Is getting an abortion as easy as 1-2-3? Like, is it an easy option?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 02:53 PM
1

History of Violence, The Hurt Locker, Open Range, .... Damn, I miss good movies.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/19 04:36 AM
1

Because what does it say about me who generally has a higher n count than most women I date? But also I don't like or dislike someone based on n count. That's similar to saying "I don't like conservatives/liberals, or I don't like gun owners." You can make those kinds of statements but they're myopic and premature if you don't know the person in question well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/19 09:55 PM
12

Exercise, water and sunlight are great. 1.5-2 pounds of red meat a day isn't great, or even good. I eat red meat. I'm not a vegetarian or PETA. That much red meat doesn't fit with my effective nutrition schedule. If you said eggs and oatmeal, that's a lot more realistic for active people.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/19 02:05 PM
1

I would love my YangBucks too. I would sell everything I own and travel the U.S. by freight. Don't @ me. I've never been to our nation's capital. But I keep thinking of the tent cities on both coasts and you know those bucks would go straight into the pockets of drug dealers. That rubs me the wrong way. I wish it weren't so, and maybe if Yang had other solutions to our social problems, like the Portuguese or Swiss model, I could get behind him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 12:27 PM
8

I feel like these debates can all be summed with "some people are like that" as opposed to "all people are like that." as if all men or women react to each other the same way. that's absurd. these debates are sometimes absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/19 04:49 AM
1

"A Vindication of the Rights of Women"; What rights could a girl possibly want that a well-connected husband could not supply? Mrs. Wollstonecraft touches on that subject. Perhaps you should read her. I have no time to waste on reading the ravings of an educated woman. -fricking Poldark
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 08:40 PM
1

male
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:59 PM
3

it's funny how different people can be. certain women need men to be not so controlling and I guess certain women need men to be more controlling or assertive. I suppose that depends on who the man is. every individual has their journey. If a woman, however, tells me to not be controlling, there is a problem. It could be either person or both. It may be nothing of course. However, I would never tell a woman not to stand up for herself if she feels it's a need, and I think (just lurking through r…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:51 PM
3

I did make the mistake of assuming an RPW would prefer a self-identifying RP man. I mean, any person should be able to tell you not to be neurotic and controlling in a relationship, and that goes for men as well, and when I read some of the stuff RPM say on this sub, that's how they come off. In my perfect scenario, my SO and I don't really have to worry about who's in control or who's right and wrong. That's why I don't recommend dating outside of your personal tastes whatever they may be, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:33 PM
4

Sure, when you're with a husband that is reasonable, intelligent, strong, and caring, everything should work out fine, given that such a man is capable and willing to stfu as well when it matters. It's just that it seems that message gets lost in RP dialogues. And I'm sure it's probably not lost on RP women to give agency to themselves and stand up for what they believe when it matters. I just question why an RP woman would want to be with a "RP man" when that kind of man is more likely to be an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:01 PM
2

I don't think belonging to a hierarchical bureaucracy is on par with marriage. That's what I mean. How can someone submit and turn over that much agency to another person, especially someone you're supposed to trust? I understand it's a universal trait in the regard you describe. I don't think it's a universal trait in relationships, so it's odd that you would describe women universally in that role, or men for that matter. In earlier non-2019 times, we believed in communication as a way to brid…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 02:54 PM
2

But all the time? and doesn't the fact that it's an expectation make the situation grating? Idk, kind of seems like a meh answer. All people and women especially are meek and dying to get rid of any "agency"? Sorry, that doesn't sound realistic, but I understand what you're getting at. I just don't think that's the case as an overall way of life as you make it sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 02:09 PM
1

How did you deal with what I perceive as the RP female submissive role when it comes to decision making and thought processes within the partnership? As an individual wouldn't that drive you crazy? I'm asking because that kind of intellectual submissiveness to men is what I imagine RPM expect and RPW cede, and part of what RP is about. Am I wrong about that? As an RPW what are your thoughts and how do you navigate that when that attitude in men pops up? ps- sorry if i'm treating you as the RPW e…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 12:35 PM
1

No but I also don't find it disgusting or odd that most men are married to shorter women. On average, men have a higher n count. Statistically what we're describing is the norm. Maybe statistically there are more women with mates with lower n count than there are women who earn more and women who are taller. But like I said, all of this misses the point, is your partner a good partner? That should be the only thing you take into account. Looking for a women with a lower n count is disgusting, as…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 12:42 AM
1

Sure, but it belies insecurity in a man in my opinion. Given my own n count I prefer a woman with a similar count, with a similar sexual history, just as I prefer a woman with similar tastes, similar political views, etc, etc, for the obvious reasons. I can't imagine a better way. For example, if you purposely look for a virgin or a girl with a significantly lower n count, you're automatically setting yourself up for a relationship where n count is a factor, where power is a factor, where the on…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 10:56 AM
1

elucidate please. i don't follow. are you saying you don't understand the context?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 05:55 AM
1

that's even worse advice: "touch only if you're desperate"? here's better advice: don't touch anyone if you're going to feel like a perv, or guilty of something, anything
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 03:27 PM
1

Attractive extroverted men produce passive dread by existing. There are men who were raised to be nice, and to respect women, blah blah You know you can be both, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 08:12 PM
6

There are innocent touches. I've accidently touched a boob in a celebration hug, with friends and with strangers. Women understand they have bodies and in close contact, something might happen. But there's a difference between innocent touch and not innocent touch. If I were a politician I wouldn't massage every neck I came in contact with. That's creepy. If Biden were just my regular uncle, it would still be creepy. And as somebody pointed out already, if I were worth millions, I wouldn't touch…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 10:51 PM
2

No to dating a sexually prudish woman. Sex daily is what I'm looking for. I don't know how I feel about the no blowjobs. I think it could be okay. It's not that big of a deal and I would still go down on her regardless. I have no interest in anal. I am kind of repulsed by it. It's about giving each other our best. A few people in this thread have said sex is not that big of a priority. It doesn't take up a lot of space in my head either or anything but I'm having trouble imagining what a low sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 05:18 AM
1

but that sounds like compatibility issues to me. some people are more "anal" (no pun intended), or more conservative or whatever. my problem with this theory is: I find it hard to believe that of all the qualities in a woman to consider like set of morals, choice in aesthetics, beauty, rapport, etc, n count is the thing that would keep a man from being happy. it's not even a quality. it's a statistic. others like me couldn't give a hoot. and i'm making a distinction between n count and acting sl…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 02:41 PM
1

hey, more power to you then if you can discern the difference. "falling in love" isn't dependent on a woman's sexual history in my experience. you're claiming it does in yours, but the fact there are two different opinions makes the theory wrong. And I am no outlier either. women of all sorts of sexual histories have successful marriages. I know I can name a few from my personal life.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 08:43 PM
2

I'm certain that a girl with a "high" n count is as desirable as one with a low. Ask your penis next time how it feels when a girl is flirting with you. That's not to say that men want to be with girls who act slutty all the time, but there's no correlation between desirability and sexual experience. that's just "theory" but it's not real, and the people who claim it is are the same people who would bend over backwards for the attention of that same girl. it's a theory based on jealousy more tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 06:50 PM
9

it's a nope from "most" guys if their girl has touched a foreign penis? okay, that's enough internetting for me today.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 02:35 PM
29

Not every girl is a party girl. Not everybody cares if their girlfriend has touched a penis before their own. What are we talking about here?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 12:35 PM
1

Both of you are absolutely right.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 09:48 AM
4

Delaying sex has no effect on a lot of men. For one, we've had sex before. There's no mystery to it. It's okay to not jump into bed at the first sign of emotions but there is a point of diminishing returns in that "strategy." At some point, you become a little weird about withholding sex as you become a life problem rather than a life solution. People may disagree but I consider after one week of dating to three months of dating to be a reasonable amount of waiting. But honestly, I fell hardest …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 09:20 AM
1

right, but it's a hop, skip and a jump, from this is the mission to it's not happening, i'm pining for a girl, to where is mine? No, it's not. It's a big deal because quality relationships which include emotional and physical intimacy are necessary for mental well-being. Sure, but this is not something that is taught. Conversely, what is taught is "get some." The act precedes the benefits so I guess people forget there is a "reason for sex" in lieu of "sex is a goal." It seems people lose sight …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 11:56 AM
1

"As a nascent pubescent boy, your mission is to lose your virginity." Every guy I've ever known grew up with this. That's why it's such a big deal for incels, high school boys, and every man ever put on this earth. So I'll disagree with you that there is not an assumption that women do not complete this mythical mission for men. And I don't know what you mean by implying feminism has anything to do with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/19 11:36 AM
0

Umm, sure, if that's your philosophy, but if i'm being honest, I'm not sure what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 04:34 PM
3

no, but I look for the right girl, someone i'm attracted to and has the same set of morals I do. I do pay for women because money is meaningless if you don't spend it the way you want. but as far as prostitution goes, there's no winners, and you don't get anything back for it. when I pay for dinner or use gas I at least feel like money isn't an issue, that what i'm doing is facilitating human interaction. that's why it's worth it. and it's not like women haven't driven hundreds of miles to see m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 09:13 AM
1

sex is not something I could or would spend money on, for multiple reasons. you may as well throw money down the drain. also, it's exploitative work. nobody wins and it's an ethical crime, and it's just sad for everyone involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 07:44 AM
2

Isn't this what work is for? I've never been too keen about gf's invading my work bubble. It's a space away from another space and that works just fine for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 06:18 AM
1

He did the right thing, ha ha.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 01:59 AM
5

Only solution is to break her femur to test whether you'll stay with her or not during that time. Relationships should be reciprocal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 06:48 PM
4

tbf, I've heard plenty of girls talk about guys this way. it's usually just flexing as the kids say these days but a lot of them are Stacys so as a guy, it seems believable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 05:21 PM
8

Sith Lord Mother Theresa is my new band's name
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 04:16 PM
5

It is neurotic. Sex is pretty much the same with anyone but with intimacy and practice being the most major factors. I once ghosted a girl after a ONS because the sex was terrible. Six months later she fenagles her way into my bedroom and we date for another three years. She ended up being one of the best sexual partners I ever had.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/19 06:23 PM
7

It's up to you as an individual to discern the difference between the two. You have to be able to tell when a girl is actually into you or not. If you can't do that, then yikes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 06:48 PM
2

Relatable :D
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 04:26 PM
3

So who is he? I'm kind of curious now.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 01:16 PM
1

That's odd. He always looks so tall next to Lenin, to Churchill, next to his generals, etc. Heck, til. But honestly, why use the word manlet? This is the problem. Should I go around defining people by their presumed physical flaws? It's gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 04:31 PM
1

I'm not. We may pontificate on the merits of physical characteristics but we don't have height requirements or nose requirements or whatever. No guy ever says "her fingers are too long, pass." Men get the reputation of being shallow but in reality they are much more permissive about women's looks than women are about men's height.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 03:08 PM
0

You're probably right about the demographics. It just pains me to know guys irl who have been effected by this. It's quite the horror show sometimes. Deep down somewhere there is a well of pain. I know women have their analogues. That's why I think stuff like this is sketchy. From my perspective it does seem shallow. I know I am not that strict about who I think is dateable or not based on looks and I'm a decent looking person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 02:02 PM
2

Maybe but I think there are far more men who are "short" than women with undateable hips, for lack of a better term. And that's not even the biggest problem. The problem is the female stigma surrounding "short" men. Women talk and think about them as wholly undateable, whereas men are not that particularly vocal about the hour glass figure. Men are much more forgiving of women's bodies than women are of men's height. Shortness is men's body positive movement. Stuff like this makes me seriously q…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 01:54 PM
1

That's what I'm getting at. I don't think most dictators, hateful or not, are short men. There's Mobutu and Adolf, but that's it. Hussein, the Ayatollahs, Qaddafi, Stalin were all tall. The Kims are not short in their culture either. Btw, the average height of American men during the Civil War was 5'7" or 5'9" depending on your source. That's why I bring up Napoleon's height. Every source I've checked says his height was average as well at 5'7". Mobuto, Adolf, Stalin, the Ayatollahs, the Kims we…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 12:00 PM
5

Does this mean one can be a non hateful dictator? Hussein and Qaddafi were tall men. Were they not hateful? Stalin was definitely tall and hateful. The Ayatollahs have never been short either and they're hateful. The Kims are hateful but not short in their culture. Mobutu was short and hateful. Adolf Hitler was 5'9". Gotta say, I don't see a correlation between hateful dictator and the Napoleon complex. Speaking of which Napoleon was 5'7" but I'm almost positive this was the average height at hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:40 AM
-1

Men have to be attractive to women. They don't have to run through a series of tests. I question why women are so shallow with respect to height though. Men are not that shallow to women. It seems odd and prejudicial. If men's best attractive qualities are not about looks, why does height play such a big factor? And it's not even that it plays such a big factor, it's that women are so prejudicial about height. The degree to which women make a big deal about it seems wrong. It may be the way "the…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:29 AM
1

Yeah, the whole men have to do for women thing is played out. Most girls who present that option to men seem cheap and high maintenance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 11:06 AM
-2

Women prefer tall guys Why is that? Really, why is that? For men, the hips are pretty basic, have at least some. There's not a lot of women who straight up look like boys. There are a few but that's it. I can count the ones I know in one hand. Women's preference for height doesn't seem as basic, doesn't seem as crucial. It seems shallow. Thus, hiding behind the argument of preference seems glib, and prejudicial in an awful way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 10:45 AM
4

Whether we can draw a 1-1 equivalence between the two behaviors or not, they're both equally shady, except for the fact the women's prejudice against short men is a lot more ubiquitous and permitted. It's a bad look. It's an objectification of men. And it is a sexist trope that masculinity is tied to height. Replace height with any female physical characteristic and you can see how horrible a thought this is. And it's so accepted and so ubiquitous. It's disgusting, as disgusting as men claiming …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 08:47 AM
1

Maybe you misunderstand what I mean. The situation depends on how well each individual assesses what is going on between two people. If you have a good grasp on what the situation is, then knowing when it's good to have sex is as easy as knowing when the relationship is headed in a great direction. I don't think that's the first date but it could easily be by the third week depending on how much time you've spent together. But generally by the third month, you should know. But having sex on the …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 07:50 PM
4

Yeah, I don't mind women holding out until a relationship starts to form. That's how it should be imo. It's when women try to "game" withholding sex as a ploy that makes a woman seem immature and not worth the trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 06:08 AM
8

It doesn't work. Delaying sex or not delaying doesn't factor into my commitment. It's okay if a woman doesn't want to invest that amount of emotion in. I understand what sex means to a woman, and to me as well, but at least in my case, it's a myth that withholding sex or not is going to secure love or commitment. If anything, sex will make me consider commitment sooner rather than later. But I'm not RP guy. My mission is to find love, not pad my stats with women. I'm content with my experience a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 02:36 AM
1

Yeah, that's the thing. Everyone is unnatural. Everyone goofs up. It's knowing that's a natural part of life which separates someone who is comfortable with themselves from someone who isn't; people who are anxious, nervous, full of self doubt, etc. All it takes for any man or woman to be natural is to be okay with everything around you, the good, the bad and the ugly. Know thyself and be happy about it is the best quality to have. I think maybe the RP term for this is "holding frame." I could b…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:49 PM
1

no but empathy informs logic. it's a factor. and fact is part of a set of facts that construct a logic which may or may not be independent to another set of facts and logical conclusion. people place too much importance on just one thing when in reality there's a myriad of facts and logic to consider. it's such a common failure in understanding that it bears noting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 08:23 PM
1

There sides of the same coin. I can sympathize with a quadriplegic to a point of understanding even though it's impossible to empathize. The goal posts are similar and part of the same conversation. Frankly, this kind of quibbling over semantics belies a willingness to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 08:13 PM
2

But you can imagine childbirth is an entire situation not to be taken lightly? You could easily argue that the more severe the experience the easier it is to sympathize. I've never lost an arm or been shot, but I can easily sympathize. That's not b.s. at all. Furthermore, all it takes is for men to simultaneously say getting kicked in the balls is an experience not to be taken lightly and women all concede the point. None of this is hard to understand. I've never been ugly but if an ugly person …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 07:48 PM
2

It's honestly not that hard and I'm no brain genius myself. It seems like a low bar to me. We're all humans here and imagining what others go through is not rocket science. If you were to insert any descriptor for men and women, I would still be able to relate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 07:13 PM
4

I mean I guess, dude, but then the problem becomes why do men have such a terrible perspective on women? Why must they assume the worst rather than take a measured response to a fellow human being? Furthermore, women had to fight for pro choice, and now years later you want to condemn them on the single fact they had to use a particular type of rhetoric, mostly in exasperation more than anything else. As a side note, this is why I think you're using "facts and logic." You're arguing from one par…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 06:13 PM
1

and it's a good thing you had an okay time with it. that's how it should be and what women fought for. but the reason women used that particular kind of rhetoric was to push back against the resistance to the pro life movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 06:06 PM
-1

I'm not making that implication at all. I'm stating the fact that for decades that has been the message from pro choice advocates. And I already addressed why this is the case. Yours is a perfect example of wanting to by right with facts and logic rather than seeing the problem in its entirety.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 06:00 PM
2

But you're making the implication that women think abortion is "no biggie" and that defies reasoning in the first place. Plus, the fact that abortion should be an easy and seamless medical procedure does not mean it should be without trauma and assuming an abortion is without trauma has never been the case. Only unthinking men would make that assumption because it's not part of their lived experience. But any cursory glance at the problem will tell you there is no easy solution. There is only a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 05:54 PM
-4

I imagine they've had to use this rhetoric to argue back against the mountain of resistance the pro choice movement has faced. If a person or man cannot differentiate between rhetoric and reality then that's on that person. And this exemplifies the real problem, that men have a hard time putting themselves in other peoples' shoes. They would rather be right with facts and logic than listen to other people. It's a huge and common problem in the general political sphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 05:41 PM
2

I've responded with a comment twice now and deleted it because I didn't like the way the comment came out. I'm going to try again. Would you say men prefer a low n count or a beautiful women? Would men prefer a low n count in a women with a troublesome personality or a sane, level headed, pleasant woman? How important is n count to a successful relationship compared to other factors? Isn't it better to date a woman who will have sex for the right reasons over a woman who would avoid sex for the …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 03:35 PM
3

yeah, I get that. it's just that n count doesn't factor in. people with more opportunity are going to have a naturally higher n count. this contradicts any notion that a low n count increases smv for women. because women on a biological level still want to reproduce, they will fornicate. it's just that all things being equal the higher their smv the higher their n count. and the same is true for men. until a man or woman is ready to settle down their n count is going to be a function of time, t,…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 01:55 PM
2

I think the low n count for women would only be true after getting pregnant. Before getting pregnant attempts at reproduction in your theory would be rewarded. It's true women might prefer a single sexual partner but without successful copulation, attempting to seduce the next sexual partner is the best reproductive strategy. I can see why one would think the sperm/egg analogy translates to wanting to settle down vs wanting to stay free to roam, but I don't agree n count plays a role in any of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 12:37 PM
1

I live in the South. A girl I know said she didn't need feminism, she just wants to raise her boys like gentleman. I can't think what the difference is though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 01:04 PM
2

Are we talking Gerber face or Justin Bieber? Because Justin gets away with a lot because he's pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/19 12:04 PM
5

Why does everything have to be "feminism killed my cat or whatever, CMV"? Women who want you to show your emotions are probably not talking about you but about their boyfriend and that's a relationship issue, not a feminist one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 02:53 AM
1

four kids under 18. yes, half; and honestly, he has enough to go around.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 02:12 AM
2

I just googled (binged) "critique of misogyny in the arab world" Who do you think is writing all of these articles? I see this accusation, this argument, made against feminists all the time, but if you've been reading the news for the past 30 years, you would see feminists have been writing about misogyny in the arab world for a long time now. Just because Fox, CNN, etc choose not to report on women in Arab countries (they sometimes have) doesn't mean feminists aren't actively trying to bring at…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 07:09 PM
2

I think it's weird because it makes it seem like OP didn't love her, in which case he shouldn't be dating her I guess, but the fact that something trivial is more important than love is bananas to me. Okay, say OP does care about that, is that enough to give up on love? It's one thing to have standards but it's another thing to be trivial about love.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 05:45 PM
3

I'm sorry if I read your intention or your question wrong. I tend to think that someone who belongs to the femosphere as you call it can relate to actual feminism since they too are women, and as such think that hashtag whatever is important enough to exist in order to change hearts and minds. Does the feminist message get diluted by the obnoxiousness of social media? Probably but I guess that's what happens when everyone has a voice. What I don't do is turn around and say they don't have a poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 02:24 PM
9

I grew up in an immigrant, traditional conservative family. I was the third child, my older sister was the oldest of us four and she is about 2.5 - 3 years older than me to put this in perspective. Some of my first memories, around 4 years of age for me, were of my older sister rebelling against my mom who was making our sister serve me and my brother food, clearing our plates, making her do female chores, etc, and as she grew older my sister rebelled against my mother's strict christian upbring…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/18 01:53 PM
1

it's all good in the hood
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 04:58 PM
1

yeah, i guess you'd need to see and know the show to really have an opinion on it. it was an interesting case to me because there was controversy surrounding it, and of course if it boils down legally, it was 100% rape. it's just curious in this post's context because she had been "wanting" it for so long. that's the only reason i made my original comment. I was hoping I could get an opinion from someone familiar with the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 03:52 PM
1

i wanted a comment, another's opinion, on the situation in the show. that's all. i wasn't using the show as a way to put forth a point of view, or make a generalization from a single incident, fictionalized or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 03:37 PM
1

Sage words. I suppose I shouldn't base my views on gun violence through television shows either? Boy oh boy, I was lost but now I'm found.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 12:55 PM
1

Do you watch Poldark, OP? This came up in that period drama from the BBC. Essentially childhood sweethearts were separated by war, the man is presumed dead, she marries his cousin, he returns from beyond the grave, and awkwardness ensues. The man and his cousin become enemies, the two original lovers pine for each other from afar, the cousin eventually dies moments after the two men reconcile, but the original lover has married. She marries another enemy of the original lover, someone truly cart…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 01:23 AM
1

Didn't a Saudi-American journalist just disappear recently in a Saudi embassy in Turkey?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 02:25 AM
1

Yeah, going over both of their wiki stats and wiki pages, Graf blows Serena out of the water by a long shot. It's not close either. Plus, Serena had an only 8-6 record versus Justine Henin who had a much less powerful game than Steffi. There's no way of knowing how Steffi vs Serena would have played out in their primes and with the same equipment. What we do know is that despite Serena's much longer career Steffi still holds more weeks at no. 1, Steffi's record between 1987-1989 was 233-7, where…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/18 12:41 PM
1

Except she hasn't played a full schedule in over ten years and never had as dominant a year as Steffi in her prime. Her winner to unforced error ratio is atrocious and is consistently inconsistent. I stopped watching women's tennis because Serena is so awful to watch. She is not good. She is powerful. There is a difference.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/18 11:40 PM
2

Shaq has four rings and plenty of MVP's. I'm not up to date on basketball stats but that's pretty good. My point was, however, that when it comes to Serena, you can't teach size. Which is fine; it shouldn't work against her. It's just the number of unforced errors and her bad footwork, in general, that make her awful. Yes, she's literally powered through her career, but it wasn't fun to watch, and it wasn't technical, which is important in tennis. I don't know how to communicate why that's impor…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/18 02:32 AM
1

Ah, I know next to nothing about Premiere Soccer
/r/TheRedPill09/09/18 07:07 PM
3

There are stats and there are stats and there is technique. Serena makes too many unforced errors to seriously be considered the goat. She has the most titles but she also has the most errors as a champion, and she has poor technique. As a tennis purist, she is hard to watch. Who wants to see a bunch of unforced errors and poor technique? Compare Serena to Kim Clijsters and it's night and day from Serena's bastardization of the sport to Kim's athletic poetry. And Serena's inconsistent shot makin…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/18 03:04 PM
1

Yes, that's the real debate. Props to you.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/18 12:35 PM
40

She is most definitely not the best female tennis player ever. In fact, she is painful to watch. She is inconsistent on the court and in her win-loss ratios, and she is undoubtedly the queen of the unforced errors. Twenty years in the sport and I still see her hitting off her back foot. You compare Serena's winners to unforced errors ratio to that of Stefi Graf's and Stefi blows her out of the water; Stefi, who had an 81-3 year during one of her dominant years as champion. Translate that record …
/r/TheRedPill09/09/18 09:33 AM
2

I get your argument but that's always sounded false or like hyperbole to me. It reminds me of so called white guilt. Just because someone criticizes the past, like slavery or whatever, doesn't mean anyone is blaming the set of this year's 16-24 year old white males. That's absurd, right? Likewise, if someone criticizes the way our entire society behaves and bemoans its effects on its individuals doesn't mean the fault lays at the feet of this year's 16-24 year old white males. That's crazy, so I…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 10:21 PM
6

Both men and women will punish men socially for crying in most circumstances. This is often repeated but I have never found this to be true. It may not be common for men to cry in public but I've gotten weepy after a good movie or at a funeral and I've cried in public as well, over break ups and family issues. Not once did I feel judged, chastised, or made fun of.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 10:15 PM
2

I'm like you, I had a very absent, very toxic, very masculine, patriarchal father. He beat my mom, stepped out on her, etc, etc, and I'm a male feminist, but when I think about why I'm a feminist, I think it's about my older sister and how part of my earliest memories are of her rebelling against the traditional conservative female roles my parents were trying to indoctrinate her in. As a kid, if my sister didn't want to serve her younger brothers, then I didn't want her to either. My sister has…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/18 09:30 PM
2

ha ha, that makes a lot more sense. i'm dumb and thank you for your patience.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/18 12:48 AM
3

UMC = United Methodist Church?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/18 12:39 AM
1

Right, but the person noticing these qualities in their mate are not with them because of status. They're together because of their qualities, which at the important levels have more to do with character than with education, such that what matters most is not whether you have a PhD but how you construct your life and your being around the education you have. Yes, people are impressed with the PhD, but the partner is impressed with their character.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/18 12:58 PM
1

I guess that depends on the character and intention of the individual. If you, personally, are questioning someone's motivation, then yikes. I'd hate not being able to trust someone or some group of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/18 12:49 PM
1

But I question whether it's status or being. In other words, is it the perception that person elicits (status) or is it the actual accomplishments and personality, etc, (being) of the person?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/18 12:44 PM
12

But is it status or culture and education? Because some men, especially accomplished and/or educated men, do expect their partner to hold a conversation, and have a mutual unsaid agreement to not fall back into mediocrity. But that's not exactly the same as wealth/looks status. It's an expectation about character and education, like my current crush on Cynthia Nixon or Alexandria Ocasio; it's about character, but not about status i.e. popularity or wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/18 12:34 PM
1

I am must be a lot different than most guys. From my perspective, I don't think that's true, or rather the competition for hottest gf is not very relevant, at all. Sure, I don't want an unattractive gf, but I don't compare gf's. As long as I'm happy with my attraction, that is what matters. That said, for me, male hypergamy is about the search for novelty. I'm always looking at other girls, getting crushes, and pursing them, but it's not vertical hypergamy as much as it is lateral, and yes, plat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/18 05:44 AM
1

I don't think anyone saw us talking, sort of, I mean. The bench was outside in front of one of the entrances but there was a ton of traffic; like 70-ish people walking in and out of the building in a 20' x 20' kind of patio thingy. That was the other thing that bothered me about the police work. This encounter had to be the only evidence there was that her and I ever met, yet at the time we were talking amid a large crowd of people. If I had hurt her in any way, I would have been swarmed by the …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 11:16 PM
2

Right, I'm pretty sure positive we had to have an ID to check out the ping pong equipment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 03:47 PM
2

I assume through university files, but how they even knew my name based on what must have at best been video from the student union is equally amazing, and if there were no cameras (I couldn't say either way), identifying me through a description would have been difficult. I honestly don't know how they found me. She didn't know my name either. It was a medium size campus but I don't remember being friendly with any of the staff working the union, so I have no idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 06:11 AM
5

I'm guessing he says stuff like this never happens? I kind of don't fit the category, sort of, because I wasn't hitting on the girl, but I did talk to her. She was a stranger. I think back on it and I'm somewhat offended by this girl. We had a perfectly okay mini conversation. I didn't try anything because she had mentioned she had a boyfriend and it was Valentine's. She was okay looking but she was also this blonde Christian type which is always a hassle (if you ask me). The bruises on her neck…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 01:59 AM
3

The bondsman keeps it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/18 01:49 AM
7

No, I was already gone and graduated by the time the statute of limitations were over which was five years later. I never even knew her name. As I thought of it over the years I figured she must have had a boyfriend who did abuse her and she pinned it on me to keep him safe. That's just speculation on my part. Maybe she was attacked in some alleyway and since she couldn't identify her attacker she accused me. I don't know. I'll most likely never know.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/18 10:17 PM
36

I was waiting on a bench outside of the student union waiting for a couple of friends. It was right before 9 am and there were a ton of people walking in and out of the place. It was Valentine's Day, I remember. Some girl sits next to me on the bench and we chit chat for ten minutes or so. She leaves, time passes, my friend(s) arrive, end of story. In the middle of June or July I get a knock on the door from two detectives asking me if I knew this girl, etc. They show me a picture of her and she…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/18 10:06 PM
1

Goddamit Stacy, you're mean. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 08:10 PM
3

That doesn't seem quite right to me. Girls know right off the bat if they'd consider, or immediately hook up, or immediately reject a guy. I've been friends with girls who wanted to hook up with me after knowing them some time without me even hinting at liking them. Ad that only goes to show that people can develop feelings for each other after getting to know each other, but mostly it's the guys who develop the feelings. So it's not necessarily a tactic as much as it is hormones. You just call …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:46 PM
1

that encourages fat, or that fat is attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 10:41 AM
2

I thought that was only one tribe in Mali
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/18 12:24 PM
1

for the dank sandwiches, obvs
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 04:51 AM
1

Out of curiosity, how big are you? I'm 5'8", 170 lbs, mostly very lean and always have been, but I've also ridden a lot of bicycles in the last ten years. I'm happy with my shape and where it's going just from the pull up bar and the running. I've legitimately gained 20 pounds in the last year just from the pull up bar.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 02:34 AM
1

buy a pull up bar for your house is my first recommendation. they're $20 and you can work out whenever you want, as often as you want.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 02:29 AM
1

What it's done for me is burn fat, and that's accentuated my V-shape and muscle tone.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 01:10 AM
2

Try running too. https://zenhabits.net/how-to-go-from-sedentary-to-running-in-five-steps/ has great advice. I'm no fitness guru but after all the pull ups I've been doing (and muscle gain), running is getting me shredded. Eat right too, obviously.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 10:28 PM
2

Meh, you'll be alright. Who cares? Be happy. The age difference isn't that big and if you're both charming, happy people, I think it'll work. Best of luck to you two, ya crazy kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 05:59 PM
3

As a man, a 28 year old virgin woman is a big red flag for me too. It's not a deal breaker but if a woman is making that big of a production about her virginity, then it can be tiresome. It doesn't have to be but it often is. Of course, unlike men, a 28 year old virgin woman is typically Christian and that's an even bigger hard pass. To be fair, though, everyone has a first time. It's not an automatic no if I meet a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 09:06 PM
2

Cool, I'll keep that in mind for future posts. Thanks for taking the time to educate me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 09:55 AM
1

Does every CMV post have an automod section from the time of its posting? Asking for future reference
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 09:52 AM
1

it's an interesting take and connection I hadn't thought of before but there are definitely a lot of similarities. Even some married women experience a decline in over all happiness just by not being as beautiful as they once were, though plenty of post wall married women find fulfillment in just being without placing an emphasis on looks. Like everything related to the gender wars, mostly everyone has a valid perspective. I personally don't like to make fun of incels or women, for that matter, …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 05:05 PM
1

no, lol. i just thought the post was hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:45 PM
1

hot takes by lemonfloss :D good shit, bro
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 04:43 PM
10

Thank you, I think CC is blown way out of proportion. I know girls who were sexually active. I dated some. I know a ton more girls who were a lot less promiscuous, almost homely and shy about sex. I dated girls somewhere in the middle. All of them however are well rounded, healthy minded individuals, even the CC girls. Some of the CC girls I dated are now in healthy, monogamous marriages (and not even with Chad). I find it mind boggling that TRP keeps pushing this N count theory around. I think …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 01:41 AM
1

Yeah, approaching anyone would always be weird, unless there's a specific reason, like business or hacky sack. I agree, that's obvious. A woman in a relationship should always shut that down immediately. Also, how successful are those kinds of approaches? The only times I have done that is when a girl is ogling me and has been for days, or something. But that's more of an invitation more than a blind approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 04:54 AM
1

Jeez, I don't know Batman, you think it's a good idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 01:55 AM
1

I make observations at the check out line sometimes, to whoever is near me, young, old, male, female. I'm not expecting anything afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 01:54 AM
3

Heroes of American greatness
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 12:38 AM
5

Meat thinks? Eww! But how does it talk? It just slaps its meat around. Eww.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/18 08:44 PM
1

I don't think I agree with either of you. I'm just not that desperate for female attention so I've gotten past dating as an artificial game with rules and advice and what not. I've never done that as a matter of fact (other than how soon to call, etc). We either click or we don't; we either develop feelings for each other or we don't. The main thing I look for is a genuine connection, and treating women as a game to bone or not is not something I would do and I don't like it when women game whet…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/18 03:54 AM
0

Sure, everyone judges everyone else. That doesn't mean you should be "testing" people. That's not cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 11:50 PM
1

To me the fact that a person deliberately tries to manipulate others, especially for love, promotes narcissism in the individual; having proved something or gotten your way through manipulation. It distances you from genuine interaction as well. It's behaving in a way that doesn't do credit to who you are as a person or represent your total self. Furthermore, it in no way promotes getting to know a person. Also, and this is what I look for irl when talking to a woman, what do you bring to the ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 10:06 PM
1

I'm not that RP, if that's part of the RP training manual. Plus, the circle of trust is broken when you do something like this, and it's not even a good indicator of worthiness. How much you "test" a person, to what degree you let them near you on a physical level is going to be incumbent on your attraction, but this, setting up barriers, is the opposite of that. It's kind of gross that this would be a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 05:29 PM
2

Because the other thing, testing, sounds like a game. It doesn't sound nice, and it's disappointing that people would be so non chalant about that kind of thing existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 05:06 PM
1

How exactly is that^ vetting?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 05:02 PM
5

By finding out who the person is, and see if you like him or not. Why is that not common knowledge?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 04:59 PM
1

See how much he’s willing to sacrifice for you and what lengths he’s willing to go to be with you, and then decide whether or not he’s worthy of sex with you. Calm down there, Satan.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 10:43 AM
1

I don't see how that conflicts with what I've said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 02:44 PM
1

Is there a fourth wave feminism? because i don't think there are very many women or people who would consider your 3rd wave feminism viable. women who subscribe to feminism generally detest men. they don't want to be like them. my understanding is they would rather they change, or die (lol; i joke a little). maybe you're conflating the freedom to be like men as an edict to be like men, but the two things are entirely different things and belong, as you point out, to 2nd wave feminism. the way i …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/18 07:55 AM
1

But you can have confidence, assertiveness and frame without the duplicitous gotcha moment TRP seems to encourage. I guess if you think you can spin plates then go ahead and try. Usually that leads to drama, and I never understand how TRP guys eschew their own feelings. I guess people are made up of different things. I know how hard it is to stay faithful. I'm still looking for a unicorn myself. But it's the fact that I know how easily I'll cheat on someone that keeps me from getting into a rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 06:35 PM
0

If I had to choose one over the other, I would choose cardio first, but longevity research is showing that a mix of the two throughout your lifetime is best. That's kind of a common sense thing. Everybody knows the value of dressing up. Not everybody cares. Yeah, nothing wrong with being nice and polite but if anyone wants anything more then there should be some quid pro quo. That's a common sense thing, don't let people walk all over you. If you're confident in yourself and care about yourself …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 03:38 PM
1

Are there cultural, economic and bureaucratic proclivities that stack the deck against women? People generally think that because women are officially afforded fair wages, freedom, etc, there is no need for feminism, but official law doesn't negate any negative way the average woman are treated compared to the average man, and not just economically, but in the family, in friend groups, and by strangers. That's my take on it anyhow.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/18 12:47 PM
3

There is nothing wrong with manipulation (maybe) but there is something wrong about being dishonest about your feelings; there's something wrong about being disingenuous about your intentions; there's something wrong about having cavalier intentions. So yeah, maybe there's nothing wrong about manipulation but it comes down to your intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 09:52 PM
1

i don't know. i think you just originally phrased it weird, or it was weird to me, but i get what you mean. the transition between personal fantasy and pornography is not unsubtle but i'm inclined to think porn is a direct consequence of prostitution. people need to eat. it seems like a class issue and the ever going battle between boss and worker with the twist of the subjugation of women. but ultimately a class issue. anyway, i'm sorry. i didn't mean to be argumentative.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 07:05 AM
1

Sure that. But now you're changing the argument. I was saying you cannot control other peoples' fantasies. Images are part of that fantasy. You cannot stop a person from having sexual images in their brains and by extension in media. Even if porn didn't exist men would still masturbate to non pornographic images of women, and if media didn't exist, men would still fantasize to their mind's eye images of women. You can be offended by that but you're setting an impossible, inhuman standard then. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 06:49 AM
1

Get in line, sister; men first! :p Always the men are first! (What patriarchy?)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 12:22 AM
1

Porn is offensive because you use our image in your fantasies. You could substitute Imagination in for Porn and you would get the same result. I'm not saying you shouldn't be against porn. There are moral and ethical reasons to be against it, mostly over the sex workers and the capitalist and the (historical-cultural) patriarchal system that got them there, but being offended by what we see or what we imagine cannot be policed nor should be. Yes, men are sexist pigs, because men are animals. Wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 12:21 AM
1

There's an entire section of feminists who are adamantly opposed to porn because they see it as a sort of capitalist subjugation of Women. One of the feminist subs could explain it better but there are definitely women opposed to porn on a philosophical-sociological level.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 12:11 AM
6

I would more likely date/marry a girl who didn't do her make up or worried about fashion, but not if she's religious. I like depth, not facades.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/18 12:01 AM
1

Sure.I see what you're saying. I question whether he was mean spirited about his teasing or not. If he was being mean, then yes, that's negging. But if he's only being teasing, then it's just being friendly. I commend that dude for taking the opening and running with it. Honestly, had I been him (and I have been) I would have been pissed I spent the last two hours of my life flirting with a girl who's taken. Cut me off early if I'm barking up the wrong tree. Jesus, that peeves me sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:49 PM
2

Still, though. It's still teasing. You can get away with being crass if you immediately follow with a non abusive joke, or just being nice in general. It helps if you're attractive,not denying that at all. But it's also not super necessary although sometimes it 100% is, especially in the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:43 PM
3

i don't know, man. Imo he saw an opening and he took it. There's not a lot of situations where you can break the ice so naturally like that. If something happens, you're allowed to comment on the event. If something bad happens to someone and you're not going to do more damage because you're not a bad guy, then you're allowed to try and make fun of someone in a friendly, 'hey, i didn't really mean it,' kind of way. That's life. You don't ever tease other people over their embarrassments? That's …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:38 PM
2

Fuck yeah I'm a guy. Why the fuck would I lie about that? Hey, I post in r/MMA if you don't believe me. But I haven't watched last night's fights so no spoilers. Would a girl be excited about the Johnson-Elkins fight? I am. I'm currently downloading the fights,btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:32 PM
3

I kind of disagree with you here. The situation made her feel embarrassed and humiliated. He, white knight that he is, took some of that embarrassment away from her by pointing out hey, that's life, and continuing a conversation with her. I think it's the opposite of negging.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:30 PM
1

Is there a distinction between negging and teasing? I always thought there was (correct me if I'm wrong, honestly) and this seemed like good hearted teasing (flirting). Yes, it's charming to tease someone and immediately compliment them in some small barely noticeable way, or immediately deflect from the situation with some quip about life and smile. This is imo BP alpha. Being nice and friendly and outgoing does get you laid. Anyway, what's more curious to me is my own reaction, my own experien…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:27 PM
2

I don't know how common this is. I've never done anything close to this to a woman. I hope, I imagine none of my close friends have either. I'm really sorry about this. Speak up next time. Shout. You do not deserve this kind of insensitive treatment. I think most people would agree that behavior is criminal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/17 12:24 PM
1

I mean, I think I understand where you're coming from. To you heightism is the worst form of sexual discrimination. And it's worse than being fat because not only can something be done about weight, but weight is often not a deterrent, especially not to the degree height is. All I was arguing is that there are a plethora of standards on both sides. But height is pretty bad for men. For men there are worse things than height, but everything is worse for men because women are the ones who get to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 10:37 PM
1

Dude, the convo is about relationships. Are you purposely being dense?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 07:29 PM
2

It's not an either/or issue though. being short doesn't mean you'll never get laid. the entire conversation is nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 12:30 PM
1

yours wasn't a good enough explanation to rebut mine
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 12:15 PM
2

furthermore, just because fat women find mates with more frequency than short men doesn't mean those are the determining factors for the differences in mating frequencies. every statistics ever provided from current census to dna molecular analyses going back hundreds of thousands of years indicate that women mate more than men. has being short always contributed? probably but women have historically had the luxury of being more choosy, so of course they come across as being more shallow. but ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 12:06 PM
2

i don't think it's vastly different at all. it's different but mostly it is analogous. both weight and height change the probabilities of meeting a long term partner. they're exactly the same in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 11:59 AM
1

yeah, I mean, I said it somewhere else in this thread. women in general act more special than they actually are. i'm personally tired of the princess routine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 11:51 AM
2

The argument and issue is about SMV (are those the right letters?) however. And if you're going to say women can change their weight, then I say men can also change their income. If you then want to say short men cannot change their height, then you can easily say ugly women cannot change their face. AND if you want to say there exist more short men than ugly women, I say look yonder at this sea of fat girls. And all of this boils down to individuals being choosy or not being choosy about who th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 11:49 AM
1

i'm not arguing with anyone here. obviously women can lose weight. i was just pointing out that there are somewhat similar analogies on beauty standards. are they the same? well, no, but i know i categorically do not date fat girls, or tobacco users while we're on the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 11:35 AM
2

You can change your income, though, but then you have to deal with recognizing the quality of your potential mates. So it's a shit storm as far as the eye can see.....(in my mind, anyway)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 11:28 AM
2

I've never been fat so I'm unclear about how easy it is to control. I've seen people try and succeed, and I've seen people try and fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 11:20 AM
2

I personally have a strict no fatties dating policy. I will not do it no matter how much they beg, chase or flirt. I know a lot of guys who think the same way. So I think there is plenty to compare. And for the record, I haven't be attacked for my choices in a very long time, and when questioned about it, as in this sub sometimes, I'm brutally honest about why. East as in east asia? Are we talking chubby people in south asia? Half of those chubby women are with short guys so I don't know what we…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 11:19 AM
1

Okay, so we're saying that women lack a sense of accountability for their choices whereas men are held to a higher standard? I agree with that 100% and in my mind it's due to the fact that women are the desired gender, the limiting factor, the demand and we the supply. That's one of the reasons I've become unabashedly brutal, internally, when it comes to dating. Oftentimes women behave as if they're some price and it goes to a lot of women's heads as if they don't need to be much more than a pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 11:07 AM
1

Yeah, but we also have men encouraging dating short men, or at least talking about it. Yes, we see more skinny guys with chubby women but that's an issue of thirst. An ugly girl will date a short guy too. The whole thing is a very close comparison if you negate the fact that women are the limiting factor in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 09:58 AM
0

But there are other comparisons over beauty standards that are much more similar. A lot of men will not date chubby women in the same way women will not date shorter men. I think young men have a much harder time not cheating than women do in general. For a percentage of guys not cheating is a learned behavior and one that not all men make, though obviously they should. I feel like the approach thing or making the first move is the same. Like OP states, men do not have some innate formula or any…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 08:50 AM
3

Same with me. Added to that, it was my brother who solved his problems with his fists, and I was that problem. So every day my brother beat me up, and then my mother beat up the both of us, with belts or hangers, until welts peppered our legs. Good times. Then my mom wonders why none of her children call her on the phone.
/r/MGTOW04/12/17 06:18 PM
1

Yeah, it's a pain, but what am I going to do? We can't even use the r word of the f word. There are rules that just cannot be broken.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 03:19 PM
5

No, I agree with you for the most part. I'm a fairly fit guy so I understand how working out for me is a billion times easier than for a fat person. I can get up and do things for hours (or not) and still be in shape. One of my h.s. best friends was fat. But he had to make the lifelong lifestyle decision to constantly work out, from pee wee football to lifting and running into our balding years. He's slim now and in better shape than me but it was a lifestyle choice I never had to make and it to…
/r/MGTOW03/12/17 03:35 AM
2

I'll have to look that up. Sounds interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 12:20 AM
3

I meant more equivalent in crudeness. Right, so this is what my question is about. Why is one more crude (or offensive) than the other? I suppose arguments could be made about the bro science perception that women are more sensitive than men, or the feminist perspective that women are more oppressed by the patriarchy yadda, yadda, yadda, and perhaps there are points to be made about this. Maybe like you say, however, it's just happenstance. The inequality, though, really messes with my OCD. That…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 12:11 AM
10

No, because "pussy" means wimp and is directed at men. Dick means asshole and is directed at men and the c word means asshole and is directed at women. They're exactly the same. Pussy is not the same. Pussy is something else entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/17 11:08 PM
12

Corollary question: why is it okay to call men dicks or pricks but calling women the c word is completely taboo? They're exactly equivalent and yet one is way worse than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/17 10:56 PM
1

yeah, what are they, free thinking individuals tasked to describe an umbrella to fit everyone under? how dare they!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 02:55 PM
2

yes, but then there are times when the mating rituals are so grotesque and abhorrent like in this OP and you just have to sit back and wonder at the ridiculousness of people. it's laughable but also worse, contemptible.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 04:42 PM
14

I'm glad I'm not the only person who thinks so.
/r/MGTOW23/10/17 12:56 AM
0

did this really turn into a conversation where TRPers claim women with a higher n count are less viable as mates? that's nonsense. if they make that argument, it's just them being in their own little circle jerking world. i mostly just lurk here, but why would anyone want to get into a debate with some dudes about this? they have their opinions and their bro science, and that's it. the n count argument isn't a real thing out here in the real world, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 02:11 PM
2

i'm sure there are women i find attractive that you wouldn't understand either. maybe we all have secret low bars on physical attraction. i like to think i do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:57 PM
1

and I think he is rather popular among girls XD. I find that so weird. You all are nutty! :p
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:52 PM
1

Why do you ask? I always thought he was low in attractiveness. He looks like a derpy murderer. Or like two face from Seinfeld. He's a good actor in some of the movies I've seen him in, but I could only watch 1 or 2 episodes of Hannibal. It was cringy and terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:45 PM
1

I literally defined what kind of insanity I was talking about in the section you highlighted. Excuse me if I was using a so called outdated colloquial term. The context is still there, however. I don't see why I would have to hold your hand to help you understand the meaning when it's laid there right in front of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 09:33 PM
1

How is it vague? I think I've given enough information for you to delineate the meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:53 PM
1

No speculation on your part on what I could mean through the denotation/connotation of the word?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:26 PM
1

It takes quite a bit of self-actualizing work to be at ease with oneself and with others. The road map to getting rid of all of one's anxieties and self-defensiveness isn't laid out bare for everyone to follow. Putting oneself together like this can be a tremendous challenge and accomplishment, but the pay off is you come off so natural that people will think living is easy and natural. Nothing could be further from the truth. Living is pain and at the end there is pleasure, yes. It's just not e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 07:05 AM
1

tl;dr well put together people are well put together, and seemingly sane.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 06:36 PM
4

Evolutionary psychology claims men cheat orders of magnitude more times than women, not the other way around. "All women cheat" is neckbeard, n count fantasy stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 10:19 AM
2

:) Honestly, thank you for putting that into well understood words. (I'm not a languager).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 12:37 PM
1

The problem with red pill in a nutshell. Thank you. I'm going to copypasta with your username without the /u/ for future reference.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 11:54 AM
1

I'm not using anything to justify anything. I just understand how hard it can be. I'm not justifying it. I'm understanding it. Yeah, it's called responsibility, maturity, etc. I agree. It's only that people aren't necessarily born with enough responsibility or maturity to overcome temptation. And most of the time cheaters are not fucking strangers. They're having romances with people they already know. It does no one any good to misrepresent what's going on. But I would like to make a distinctio…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 08:40 PM
1

it's not the same implication.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 07:22 PM
1

What these men full prey to is the idea of gratification, the ease of its accessibility, and the idea they shall bear no consequences for their actions. That's not it at all. It's the wonderful feeling of being loved. That's the temptation. It's not greed or a lack of responsibility. It's the wonderful feeling. It's being lost in the moment. It's a cosmic thing. An infinity of happiness shared in a few minutes. It's not about other people or guilt, or getting away with something. That's not what…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 06:08 PM
2

I've always had a high sex drive and have been chronically masturbating since the age of 8. Despite this, cheating never crossed my mind because it's not about sating sexual need. That's exactly the same thing with me. However, I've had a lot of girls/women throw themselves at me, and that's when it's hard. It's very difficult to stop the multiple advances of women. It's easy not to cheat when you're left alone. No problem. I'm not a psychopath on a mission or anything. It's hard to stay faithfu…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 05:26 PM
1

I had to learn to control mine and I did so out of guilt and personal responsibility but it was a very hard thing to learn and control. It wasn't easy and it didn't feel natural. And to this day I understand how hard it is for some guys to control their libidos and I wouldn't expect a young man to be able to. It's simply too hard and to have that expectation on every young man is not realistic because for many it simply does not feel natural to not cheat. When cheating, it actually feels like yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 03:57 PM
2

It doesn't seem to be true and I don't know anyone that still thinks so. It was a gag in It's Always Sunny so I took it to mean that people didn't think that anymore and the only people who do were about as well put together as The Gang, which is to say not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 04:16 AM
32

She was legitimately the cancer in Walt's life before and after the actual cancer. I can't imagine anyone would defend her. She was so emasculating and naggy. I couldn't stand her. People in general are pretty dumb but if someone cannot see that BB's good and bad characters were on both sides of the fence, then that just proves my point about people being dumb.
/r/MGTOW23/08/17 10:33 AM
7

OP makes a point. I was masturbating to JC Penny catalogues and the Victoria's Secret pages when I was in elementary back when Commodores were the best computers. In the eighth grade I saw my first real porn in a room full of other eighth graders but none of that affected the sublimity of the first time a girl took off her blouse for me. Porn wasn't as ubiquitous as it is now and maybe some people have a skewed sense of what sex is but like the couple the other day asking if they were doing sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 04:26 PM
1

She wants her cell phone paid for. She wants her cable tv paid for she starts seeing other guys. Forget red pilling for a moment. How is this not reason enough to go no contact? Tell him I said not to be a chump. I hope that helps.
/r/MGTOW23/07/17 06:34 AM
1

I agree with you 100%. The problem, I think, is half anti-bullying and half proper behavior. Unfortunately, people have to go through adolescence and that's a particularly trying time, and I don't think the old adage "it gets better" is enough to help teens navigate through it. So I do commend everyone's efforts in trying to help. I personally find the love yourself narrative really helpful, but I guess it takes a village of ideas to help everyone through.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 10:58 PM
3

This escalated much quicker than I thought it would. Are you implying "dude" is some sort of racial slur? Is being male now the equivalent of being scum? Could you not tolerate being called man, woman, cis, trans, gay, black, Asian, European? I don't see anything wrong with any of these things. I don't understand why you would either. If you want me to call you something in particular, I'll do my best but if I fail to meet your expectations, it's not out of malice or hatred. It bothers me that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 10:47 PM
2

Of course, some random dude couldn't explain themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 10:37 PM
3

Be that is it may, a rose by any other name....people are who they are individually so what difference does it make what they're called? They're still the same person regardless. Why the obsession with titles? We're all just humans here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 10:29 PM
1

Okay, so I'm not judging people or anything, but I'm subbed because most women are not worth it yet there's tremendous pressure to "find the one," or to date or be interested or not be interested or however you want to describe the male-female dynamic. What's worse is that most of these pressures, at least in my case, are internal coming straight from myself more than anyone else, but most times women are just not worth it, because they won't make up their minds; because they act like princesses…
/r/MGTOW10/07/17 04:56 AM
0

there's this girl who likes me (and I like her too) but I met her when she was one month pregnant and newly engaged to some dude she thinks is dumb and immature (but a really nice guy). and i'm like, "well, you settled," and that's what settling feels like, dummy. :p
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 11:42 PM
3

they shouldn't settle for bb but they also shouldn't be doormats for chads. they should chill until they find the right guy and be happy being alone until then. because people should have the right to pursue happiness. it just takes being on your own until you find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 09:03 PM
1

people want to call them the greatest ever but all they did was over power their opponents. for an entire decade i saw the sisters hitting off their back feet and sending shots long and short, but who could deal with their power? they're complete garbage, especially in their early years.
/r/MGTOW27/06/17 07:36 AM
1

I always have an internal debate about Martina, Stefi and Monica. I cannot decide, but imo, no other women come close to them. Martina holds the most records, though, by a large margin....
/r/MGTOW26/06/17 07:46 AM
2

I blame the Williams sisters for that too. Back in the Seles, Graf days, they were hitting more winners than errors, and that was also true in the earlier Navritolova days. The Williams sisters came along and ruined women's tennis. Without them we would have had years of Clijsters and Henin who played much better tennis than Venus and Serena.
/r/MGTOW26/06/17 07:44 AM
1

but it's been almost 2 years that I've been single. oh, the horror!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 05:42 AM
2

it's a private sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 05:34 AM
3

Are smokers/drinkers/snowboarders/motorists/non-exercisers similarly lacking in value? Disregarding the medical services argument, yes. They do lack value, in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 05:28 AM
1

I find it irritating when people say they're nerds because they like anime. No, just no.
/r/MGTOW14/06/17 09:06 AM
2

I mean, even if I hate a job, I'll do it if I'm responsible to a team, especially to a team that's been there for me. Such bullshit.
/r/MGTOW04/06/17 11:43 PM
1

yeah, the internet is rife with those people. i mean, i'm a little guilty of it too, i guess; my passive aggressive comment there. and what's worse is i don't mention how a good majority of immature guys will take it out on their own beta male friends as well, so my original comment doesn't even hold water. that's kind of why i hate these pill subs. they rarely take into account maturity of character in either sex. it's all id driven analyses of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 07:21 AM
1

Yeah, I don't think guys are mean to other women when they've been rejected, so I guess only 50% of the population is guilty of this particular type of reaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 04:10 AM
15

Kevin Spacey is a god among actors. I kind of hate this role for him too. Edward Norton and Tom Hanks are the only guys I can think of that are on his level, and he may be better than both of them.
/r/MGTOW01/06/17 05:37 AM
1

She's no Jamie Lee Curtis, though.......Susan Sarandon is super hot too. Cate Blanchett, even Diane Keaton are all hotter than Robin Wright. She did age horribly, or maybe it's that hair cut or that role?
/r/MGTOW01/06/17 05:35 AM
4

I get similar situations with pretty young girls who were iffy with me before suddenly getting thirsty as they approach their wall. I stay friendly and polite for the lulz.
/r/MGTOW11/05/17 12:57 PM
1

I don't like that women as a whole cosmopolitan population wear make up. That's my red pill criticism of women. I'll just say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 11:16 PM
2

Or things that are just by-lines like, am I attracted to blonde women with nice curves? As a man, yes, but does that mean I'm dropping my entire life in pursuit of Stacy, or that her existence makes my SO insignificant? No, that's bananas., and it doesn't even enter anyone's minds to the degree that it would become a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 11:13 PM
3

There's all sorts of reasons women shame men, and it's not just because "men expect sex." Sometimes, it's true, men expect a chance, to be heard out, and from their perspective, why wouldn't they? They would hear out a greater variety of women. Why aren't things the same the other way around? Well, there's a difference in dating strategies. Women are the limiting factor. They get to decide who dates and who doesn't date. It would be nice if they were aware of that instead of blindly being catty …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 08:13 PM
2

it's a difference in the sexes. maybe if women wouldn't wear make up, they wouldn't have such a high opinion of themselves? maybe if they viewed men as just as flawed as themselves, they wouldn't have a desire to be saved? idk, i'm just throwing that out there. one of my complaints about women and dating is that women will often think i need to impress them. i just reject that premise out right.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 07:59 PM
5

Men with options are also picky and only sleep with hot women I was going to be the third guy to point out that is wrong, but ... you get the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 05:56 PM
1

Not at all. Some of the best sex I've ever had, tbh. 5'2", ex gymnast. I just didn't like her all that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/17 08:07 PM
1

Plus, there's the psychological trauma of being helpless, perpetually, over a lifetime, something a lot of people do not consider. My experience was an injustice but there;s no way the two things are close to being on the same level. I can understand being upset if a man is married and finds himself in the position I found myself in, but putting our male experience on the same level as a woman's is wrong for many reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/17 12:48 AM
1

I was non violently raped by a girl roommate. It sucked because it started a casual sexual relationship with a roommate so I ended up "dating" a girl I wasn't interested in. And that was a huge violation. But to equate that to a man physically forcing piv on an unsuspecting woman still seems like a false equivalence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 11:47 PM
1

I've seen gay men criticize other gay men for promiscuity even when the criticizing gay man is as promiscuous as anyone else, and the whole room rolls their collective eyes at the recriminations. It's true, I swear!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 09:37 PM
2

Age (as in appropriate age), Physical appearance, Intelligence are the big 3. Those metrics all have to be met first. Common interests because it's easier Willing to have sex often Lack of religion. You wouldn't think it's not that big of an issue but it is. Religious people are tediously annoying and I live in the South so it's not an uncommon problem. Otherwise, #4 and #5 would be switched. Good with Children - Education Income -Career Compatibility with family. I just don't care about that. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 10:32 PM
1

80's Janet tho for all you young bucks.
/r/MGTOW10/04/17 07:12 PM
2

Fatty Janet was kind of hot, lol.
/r/MGTOW10/04/17 05:07 PM
1

Dude looks like he's 37
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 08:52 AM
1

Hey, i take issue with the thought that invisible thoughts and protests are masturbatory or otherwise meaningless. men have feelings as well as women. It is hard to separate mgtow the idea from mgtow its anti feminist proponents because obviously its members hate feminism for some, to me, unfathomable reason, but that doesn't mean mgtow arguments are unreasonable, or that they're even a protest to feminism. mgtow is actually more of a protest for the lack of feminist ideology as far as i can tel…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 05:10 AM
2

it's pretty natural and even noble to want to be a good father and have a child you could rear in the right way. and i'd say that even though awalt there do exist women with perspective and a sense of irony at least.
/r/MGTOW03/04/17 04:43 PM
4

your degree is only as valid as yourself, homie. if you have to protest to make it valid, then it probably isn't.
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 05:25 PM
7

I keep thinking this over and over and I'm glad others agree.
/r/MGTOW08/03/17 12:33 AM
1

I think a lot of what you're talking about comes down to questions like, how do you know when to kiss a girl? It takes being able to read the proverbial room plus some courage, and those are things that cannot be taught. It's these two things plus be nice, and that's all there really is to know on how to pick up women, because for the most part, it's women who are saying yes to men. Men aren't doing the choosing, women are, but then we have to make the first move anyhow so we literally have to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 07:25 PM
1

Lol, just popped in to say the same thing. Ha, only one person recognized this as bait. What even is life?
/r/MGTOW08/02/17 08:07 AM
12

Yeah, I pity people like her that are so beholden to this particular paradigm. You want kids now? You didn't before; chill, you made that decision long ago. Live with it, it's not that big of a deal.
/r/MGTOW07/02/17 01:10 AM
1

I would imagine the "fat" gene underwent neutral selective pressures when and where sugar wasn't available and since it's only now being displayed phenotypically, it's only now under negative selective pressures. It being absent or present in disparate populations would be normal under historic conditions as there was no positive or negative being expressed by it.
/r/MGTOW12/01/17 11:13 PM
12

Plus, sugar is in everything. Before the discovery of the new world, sugar was a very scarce commodity. It only existed in China, and then in only small amounts. So historically, sugar has always been a scarce yet necessary resource. Because of its scarcity, though, our brains (which needs it the most) evolved to seek it out in nature. But then we discovered the new world, and since it is so delicious (evolution at work here), we farmed the fuck out of it. But our bodies are not used to take in …
/r/MGTOW12/01/17 07:56 PM
3

Obviously you're right, and it's in large part because people (and men) can smell the bullshit, so we voted against it (I voted Stein and was Bernie or bust before then). It's entirely congruent with a Red Pill over Blue Pill phenomena.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 06:52 AM
3

There's a difference between potheads and idiot potheads. For me, these differences include smoking during the day vs. only smoking at the end of the day, and generally not letting it run your life, etc. Not every one who smokes pot belongs in Half-Baked is what I'm saying.
/r/MGTOW21/09/16 12:15 AM
3

Aniston was his adoring, submissive sex slave and he threw that away. That was the wrong move, Brad.
/r/MGTOW20/09/16 11:50 PM
2

Brad Pitt is probably the most decent person Angelina could ever hope to meet. That's the flip side of this insane equation. She's tying her own noose. Who is she ever going to meet that's a more qualified mate? But now that her kids and her nest are the most important thing in the world, forget about working things out with her mate. That aspect of women is just intolerable to me. It's just low character.
/r/MGTOW20/09/16 11:48 PM
23

Brad Pitt will have no shortage of women. If he wanted to Jennifer would be on his tip within a month (and staying there). Angelina is just ..... very demanding. Really Angelina, weed? Excessive alcohol I can understand but Brad Pitt doesn't seem like an idiot pot head. It's probably social engineering for the good of the kids (he doesn't care enough about them) and stale sex. He needs this as much Angelina, and probably more.
/r/MGTOW20/09/16 04:28 PM
2

I've had other things happen to me though and life can be pretty fucking rough. I'm never surprised when things go sideways. Suicide is such a powerful thing to experience, I'm sorry for your loss. And I'm sorry you thought I was being flip with the matter. I do think, however, that generally men are more comfortable in society and are thus more prone to commit crimes of dehumanizing abuse. That's what underlayed my argument, why I scoffed at the resentment towards Big Brother's policy. I think …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:36 PM
0

One quick glance at the New York subway lines or an introduction to Mexican culture argues against this. How can you call that conjecture? What about India? What about frat parties and the countless women who are legitimately raped? It's not bias or conjecture. In fact, it's your bias, your conjecture that there is no visible, obvious difference in the number of cases between male and female perpetrators. And that's culturally universal too, so .... erggh. How many men are groped versus women? Y…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:23 PM
2

Seriously, with all due respect, none of those arguments are convincing. Of course it's likely there exist cases of younger molested boys that go unreported. It happened to me by a teenager when I was in the 2nd grade, and I never said a word to anyone until much later. It wasn't that upsetting although it was something I did not understand at that moment and I wasn't raped as I was allowed to leave the room. I especially never told an adult because in my child's mind adults were wholly a differ…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 12:56 PM
2

Hey man, you know what? I was molested as a second grader by an older pubescent female, and I agree that the situations are a lot more nuanced than high school boys with inflated issues, and that some males end up with deep psychological issues because of the way the sex was handled, maybe I have some deep seated issues too, but mine are by no means debilitating. And another thing to observe is the very real possibility that those high school jocks, where they are emotionally traumatized by the …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 12:25 PM
2

Look, I'm not saying it's not a bad, abnormal, morally corrupt, wrong, or unethical thing, but to suggest that it is on par with what women experience is not an intelligent observation. You're purposely lying to yourself if you say they are, so it's a shame that people like you exist, people willing to lie to themselves to advance an agenda-narrative they don't even truly understand.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 11:30 AM
1

The suicide thing is not overtly related to female on male molestation. I haven't read in depth on those articles circulating a couple of months ago but I seem to recall they were more socio-economic than anything else, so why you're mentioning them is beyond me. The fact is the best you can come up with is some off topic argument that men have it bad. Men do have it bad, but that's not women's fault. It's the fault of top-down corruption in our institutions. I'm being myself. I'm not trying to …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:45 AM
-2

I'm not going to deny that as of late (the past 15 years) there has been a string of female teachers going out with students, most of which were at least 15-16, to which I would say that has a lot to do with socio-economic factors, and that is one thing.It would be another thing to say that women molest boys (not teens) at the same rate that men molest girls (not teens). I think there is a very big fundamental difference in the nature of those crimes, and afaik men still molest little girls with…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:09 AM
-1

i said more than that. in fact, i didn't say i disagreed with him. i said he was in the realm of logical fallacies. then i said some other things on the nature of discourse. this sub seems pretty fucking circlejerky though. like, if you don't fall in step with the prescribed narratives, you're automatically wrong, and not even offered a cogent rebuttal. and fuck if i care, but it's absurd to say i totally trust this man with my daughter more than i do this woman with my son. and i shouldn't have…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:42 AM
-6

/r/circlebroke
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:25 AM
-17

I would be much more willing to allow that to happen, yes. And I don't think that validates that men are inherently rapists and women are not, but if you want to say that older man-younger female trope is more viable as a sexual dynamic than the older female-younger male trope, then I'm 100% fine with that because it is a reflection of reality. Edit: as if i'm in the least bit wrong. Way to investigate the truth through dialogue, you bunch of circlejerkers.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:43 AM
-16

Oh, yeah, that's totally what I meant. /s. If you all don't have enough reading comprehension or the ability to be cool to differing analyses enough to critically rebut them then I'm not going to go the extra mile to explain myself further. Your argument is sophism through and through, and the amount of upvotes you have indicative of the quality of this sub.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:08 AM
-9

Not just that, but if I had a daughter, there is no way on God's green earth that I am allowing some random dude go hang out with my daughter.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:25 AM
1

Come to think of it, it'snot necessarily MR's issues I disagree with but most of you all's analysis of feminism. Most of the time, it seems as if you don't understand it, or have only a superficial analysis of it. As one of my new favorite television shows says (about herself, not feminism), the situation is a lot more nuanced than that. Plus, sometimes it seems that MR's advocates fail to understand that it and feminism are mostly mutually exclusive and there is no need for disdain on one side …
/r/MensRights05/03/16 02:35 PM
4

As someone who mostly disagrees with your arguments but subscribes out of curiosity, you all are not a hate sub, like at all. Just saying.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:19 AM
0

You probably have no idea how pathetic Americans think Mexicans are for all their drug violence, but that's not something to be proud of, is it? Sure, yeah, but the situation is a bit more nuanced than that. /s
/r/MensRights02/03/16 04:33 PM
-7

Oh right, Americans are so much better. Didn't the terrorists take a plane down with some fucking Exacto knives? You all have no idea how hard Mexicans were laughing at you all for that. But yeah, there's not going to be any rape hordes in America. That's fucking preposterous. I have full faith in our police state to keep the Muslims in check. Plus, the way American cities are gentrified, there's no way it could even happen, not in Texas anyway.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:03 AM
1

I still need more information than that. Are female agents able to apprehend subjects or not? What are the statistics? How are males partnered with females doing more of the work? Are they physically always on the run after a fugitive? Do the take down procedures change when you have a woman partner? Do female candidates have to pass more rigorous tests in other areas? How many female agents are actually on the field? How many are just analysts and other sundry things? I doubt there is a slew of…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 08:44 PM
1

Well, yeah, that's the metric, whether or not you can apprehend a suspect (if women are even allowed to go on that sort of mission), but the metric isn't do 50 push-ups. So if you're going to bitch, bitch about that and make yourself understood. But the idea that women have no skills to bring to the FBI is laughable. It shouldn't even be brought up. The idea that you can have an effective institution without women ignores the fact that society is based on two genders and the best people know how…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 06:39 PM
2

Yeah, show me the guy who bitches about that and I'll show you a guy who doesn't deserve to be an FBI agent. What? Are you going to ignore the biological fact that women a re different from men? Pffft, I wouldn't expect an FBI agent to be that ignorant.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:55 PM
-7

Man, you guys are focused on the wrong things; laughably so. Your complaints aren't even based on gender but rather on the minutiae of social systems. Feminists are out to change dialectical and cultural realities and how that affects everybody's psychology. You all seem to care more about laws and institutional paradigms. It's cool that you all care about false rape accusations, and child custody cases, but bitching about this? How many of you all are going to be affected by this? Do you think …
/r/MensRights13/01/16 10:57 AM
1

I'm assuming you saw this week's episode of The Simpsons?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:44 PM
2

I think the bigger issue is that it sets a precedent, a warning to other girls that they can't just get away with false accusations. 2 years does seem like an injustice especially since sh'es going to do much less jail time (that would be the case in America. I know nothing of Scottish law, so there's that caveat).
/r/MensRights24/12/15 11:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter