TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

frenulum2002 Archive

View 6 posts and 89 comments by frenulum2002 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I mean the source in-terms of year?
/r/MensRights07/10/19 08:16 PM
5

I crave an uncut cock. I’ve tried everything with both genders. The only thing left to try is an uncut dick. And I hypothesize that it will feel more pleasurable because there will be enough friction without causing pain, which is exactly what is needed to achieve an orgasm in the receiver. I think the appearance of uncut is hot. For the most part, radically circumcised is ugly. For the most part uncut is hotter with the exception of phimosis because they can’t retract the foreskin.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 04:10 AM
1

Ok, I did it.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:29 PM
1

How do I do that again?
/r/MensRights06/10/19 01:55 PM
1

Interesting, so it’s a positive slavery in a sense?
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:29 PM
2

It was 1888, where is the source?
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:23 PM
0

I’ve never seen a dick with as tight of a cut as mine.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 03:44 AM
1

The medical circumcisions shouldn’t exist because they are selling the foreskins. Also the religious circumcisions are currently being radically done. Radical circumcision should not happen.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:50 PM
1

I surely do: I am very sensitive in places other than my penis. My nipples stimulation = palm of hands sexual sensation = ridge band My Prostate stimulation = gives me ability to have full body orgasm = glans coverage combined with gliding motion My nipples stimulation + my penis stimulation = the ability to ejaculate easily = penis with very short foreskin. This combo lacks the ability of a full body orgasm, but I have had vaginal sex 7 straight times in a 7 hour period. All 7 times ended with …
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:44 PM
0

If an orgasm lasts longer and the individual is only missing the tip of foreskin, then there will be a natural edging addition, which would increase the intensity of a full body orgasm. It would likely cause a decrease in excessive sexual behavior, but the sexual behavior that is present will be way more intense.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:56 PM
0

Only the tip of foreskin.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:42 PM
1

You can edge with extra sensitivity, but you can naturally edge with the biblical circumcision.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 08:42 PM
1

So if someone is not Christian, then they understand nothing. This makes no sense. I think it’s interesting to take parts of different religions. This quote is very meaningful to me: “Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised. Was a man uncircumcised when he was called? He should not be circumcised.” (Corinthians 7:18).
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:56 AM
1

Also there are different kinds of slavery. Some would not be considered slavery in modern times.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 11:00 PM
1

But edging makes the orgasm stronger. If you have to much sensitivity in your penis, you will orgasm faster.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:47 PM
1

Yes I have, look at my post history to see proof. The puckered tip is what you are referring to. How do you differentiate between the frenular delta tissue and the inner tip tissue?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:42 PM
1

What I mean is the frenular delta would be preserved in the biblical circumcision.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:41 PM
1

What I mean is that slavery was abolished in 1865.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:18 PM
1

Then how do you differentiate between the inner tip and outer tip of foreskin?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:16 PM
1

How does one differentiate between the appearance of the ridged mucosa and the smooth mucosa?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:15 PM
1

If both individuals restored, who would have the more sensitive penis? Also the frenulum wouldn’t be cut off in the biblical circumcision?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:14 PM
1

But you would still have the gliding motion? It would just cause the man to last longer, which would increase the pleasure of the orgasm. Just like when an uncut guy edges to make the orgasm stronger.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:11 PM
1

So the inner tip is not fused to glans? They always say that the mucosal tissue is fused to the glans in infancy?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:09 PM
1

Interesting, I didn’t realize this. But what about the difference between restored penis verses a biblically circumcised penis? Which is better?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:08 PM
1

But the inner tip is mucosal tissue? The ridge band is the inner tip.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:03 PM
0

Anesthesia shouldn’t be used because the biblical circumcision is minimal.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:02 PM
-1

Very interesting. But how can slavery and religion co-exist together?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 10:01 PM
1

That’s not true because the ridge band is the inner tip of foreskin, which is not removed in the biblical circumcision. The sensitive tissue would keratinize, which would lead to decreased sensation, but in a minimal way. It would cause the man to naturally last longer, which would actually increase the pleasure of the orgasm.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:54 PM
0

Babies definitely cry from modern day circumcision and even when they don’t, they go into shock. The biblical circumcision wouldn’t cause any damage.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:52 PM
1

The inner tip of foreskin is still fused to the glans, so it wouldn’t be removed. It’s only what’s redundant without tearing mucosal tissue from glans.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:50 PM
1

No it doesn’t. The inner sensitive tissue is still fused to glans, so that part is not cut off. How would a biblically circumcised penis compare to a restored penis? Which is more sensitive?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:45 PM
-1

But wouldn’t it be better than a restored penis?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:45 PM
-1

But the babies didn’t cry
/r/MensRights03/10/19 09:44 PM
0

Yea, but the babies didn’t cry when the biblical circumcision was done. They wouldn’t lose any sensation. It actually would maintain the foreskin.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 08:45 PM
1

Wow, you have to watch everything you do these days. It all comes down to men being considered stronger than women. In addition women are considered at the same level as animals. Everyone treats them with more empathy. Men were circumcised to put them above society. If you are circumcised, always remember that they don’t circumcise women because you are higher than them. Because men have a dick, they rape. Since women have an underdeveloped dick, they can’t rape. If a female is bisexual, it’s al…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:32 AM
1

No worries
/r/MensRights03/10/19 05:17 AM
2

But some of the kids were not forced to undergo another circumcision. The article states an example of a child who did not have to undergo a second procedure.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:54 AM
1

Brit Milah
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:53 AM
2

The problem is that posting that link by itself would invalidate it because it comes from a Christian site, but I have shown that it is valid when combining different factors. In this case combining the article showing that mohel was performing it based on the Christian website, completely validated the website.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:52 AM
1

But do you think sensation wise, it would change?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:44 AM
0

I understand what you are saying, but it is a big difference to leave the ridge band and frenulum completely intact verses destroying the function of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:52 AM
3

It did mention that he did not cut the foreskin around the penis, which is the biblical circumcision. Also it mentions that the baby didn’t cry at all. This means that the glans is mostly covered. They just pull the foreskin forward from the tip without tearing the mucous membrane from the glans. When they pull the foreskin forward, they must put more tension on the dorsal than the ventral side to protect the frenulum. Here is what was performed: https://www.fisheaters.com/circumcision2.html
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:48 AM
1

If she were a trans woman would things have been different? Or does trans and cis not play a role in the double standard?
/r/MensRights27/09/19 05:15 PM
2

This bit of info is also important. Circumcision is not being performed according to Judaism: https://www.fisheaters.com/circumcision2.html
/r/MensRights04/09/19 08:24 AM
2

Beautiful post :) I showed my parents that they violated their own religion. Here is the difference between the biblical circumcision, which is what circumcision actually is and MGM: https://www.fisheaters.com/circumcision2.html
/r/MensRights04/09/19 08:23 AM
3

Also something that has always bothered me is wearing clothing has been irritating my penis. They left a lot of the sensitive tissue, which is a great thing, but every pair of underwear I put on causes me anxiety. I can’t even retain to prevent irritation because they removed so much shaft skin. It causes me regular anxiety to not have this protection. I currently go commando because underwear causes irritation of my frenulum and inner mucosal tissue. What’s interesting is that my dick lubricate…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:45 AM
2

What’s interesting is that I definitely have the frenulum near the ridge band and frenulum near the mucocutaneous region. I am missing the outer skin and almost all the shaft skin. Right under my frenulum near the mucocutaneous region is scrotal skin.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 05:31 PM
3

Thank You for that diagram. I’ve seen it many times before and was actually looking for it. One side effect of modern day circumcision is, it causes cut men to become obsessed with uncut guys. You want what you don’t have: uncut dick and vagina are 2 things I don’t have and I desire both lol.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 05:28 PM
5

Thank You. When I brought it up with my parents, it brings out the worst in them. If someone is really proud of their religion, they should be comfortable with all aspects. People need to know the truth, the biblical circumcision is what circumcision entails. Modern day circumcision is MGM. Here is the difference: https://www.fisheaters.com/circumcision2.html As you can see, there is a big difference
/r/MensRights03/09/19 05:09 PM
2

Makes sense
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:54 AM
3

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:43 AM
7

Thank You for this reply. I was tightly circumcised and I wasn’t happy with it. When ever I try talking to others, it seems to bring out the worst in them whether it be my parents or people on reddit. All I said is circumcising someone so tight is wrong and even with this statement some will say that: oh you should be so happy, so many men would want to have a tight cut, you are such pussy, you are such a baby, you are over reacting, etc. So again, thank you for your comment on my post. Being ti…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:25 AM
1

Interesting and what would you want this word to mean?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:45 AM
1

Yep, I agree. There is a membrane known as synechia: the inner epithelium of the foreskin and the epithelium of the glans are still fused, this is why when doctors or other medical professionals forcibly retract the foreskin, it is so damaging. It is equivalent to peeling back the finger nail from the nail bed. I have done a lot of research on the foreskin and the truth is that the frenulum is the key to the penis. All the nerves go through it. It’s also such a beautiful structure when I see a f…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:44 AM
1

Why would you want to make cobdom a new word lol?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:44 AM
1

It doesn’t, I think you meant it does?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:39 AM
1

I started as a CI-0. It would be great if they could use my penis for that category because CI-1 was looser than mine.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 09:03 AM
1

It sounds like you have phimosis. In a lot of cases men with phimosis will be more likely to have a short frenulum because of the lack of exercise to the foreskin, but more specifically the frenulum.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 08:54 AM
3

Why would this be any different: Removing foreskin = removing clitoral hood Removing penis shaft skin = removing labia minora Since we live in a world with equal rights between men and women, then everything should be equal. There are definitely medical benefits for female circumcision. The world health organization just has to want to find the health benefits because if you try hard enough, you can find health benefits.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 08:48 AM
1

Ridge band combined with frenulum is the clitoral hood and clitoris? When they remove the clitoris, they can only remove part of the clitoris because part of it is internal. Clitoral hood is the ridge band and the clitoris is the frenulum. How does this sound?
/r/MensRights27/08/19 08:44 AM
1

Yea, but what if the frenulum is also short. A lot of cases of phimosis include a short frenulum.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 08:38 AM
1

Sorry to hear this, what type of circumcision did you have? When was it performed on you?
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:04 AM
3

So let’s remove the clitoral hood and labia minora in baby girls in addition. Would this be ok to you because medical benefits can be found if you look hard enough for them.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:03 AM
2

It’s true, but the frenulum sensation wise is similar to the clitoris. That’s why they give the term male clitoris. It is true that the clitoral hood and foreskin are anatomically comparable because they are both considered the prepuce.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 10:01 AM
1

The frenulum is a highly sensitive structure that should be left intact as well as the bands of mucosal tissue that branch from the frenulum. There are very few doctors who know anything about uncut dicks. Otherwise the frenulum would not be removed in the first place. Just because they are a doctor does not mean anything. You are going to trust a doctor when all you would have to do is ask to keep the frenulum intact. It’s equivalent to removing the clitoris in woman. The reason they remove it …
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:57 AM
1

One video that is very interesting is this video. It explains a lot about how mutilated men and women can replicate what non-mutilated individuals can feel. I am definitely in the category that my brain was able to move the erogenous tissue around to other parts of my body: https://youtu.be/vfsl3XuU6Ow
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:06 AM
3

Can we at-least say that keeping the frenular structure is left intact. This is an important structure and must be preserved. Whether you agree or not with circumcision, please preserve the sensitive banjo string on the underside of the penis, which connects the foreskin to the corpus mucosa. How dare these doctors strip men of this extremely important structure, which prevents meatal stenosis.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:21 PM
1

It depends on the circumcision type and what remains. In addition, there are other parts of the body that have erogenous nerve endings. When an individual is genitally mutilated, the brain is able to move the sensitive nerve endings to other parts of the body in some individuals. In other individuals: they don’t think they are missing anything because to them what they have is normal. I fall in the first category because I have sensitive erogenous nerve endings throughout my body. In addition my…
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:13 PM
1

Lubricant is actually better to use with a foreskin to prevent tears to the delicate frenulum, which is an essential part of the penis.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:07 PM
3

What is practiced in modern times is male genital mutilation. The biblical circumcision is what circumcision entails. Only most or all of tip of foreskin should be cut off namely the overhang. Here is the difference: https://www.fisheaters.com/circumcision2.html
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:05 PM
2

What you could do is the biblical circumcision, which cuts off most or all of the tip of the foreskin at birth, which prevents: phimosis and Para-phimosis. It’s still very important to make sure doctor preserves the frenulum, which is the sensitive banjo string located on the underside of the penis, which connects the foreskin to the corpus mucosa, which is the base of the underside of the glans. In addition the doctor should not forcibly retract the foreskin. Just cut off the overhang. Here is …
/r/MensRights25/08/19 02:01 PM
3

I’m starting to think it’s the same as cutting off the clitoris and inner labia. When they cut off the clitoris, they can’t cut off the whole thing because part of it is internal.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 01:51 PM
4

Or a dorsal slit
/r/MensRights25/08/19 01:41 PM
1

if the outer layer is removed while keeping the frenulum, ridged mucosa, and smooth mucosa intact, how would the man lose sensation if only the outer layer is removed? I am circumcised and my frenulum is intact and it is attached to parts of the remaining ridged band. In my circumcision they removed the majority of my outer foreskin/shaft skin. How can you compare the difference in nerve endings when every circumcision is different. I know that most remove the important tissue, but mine preserve…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:36 AM
1

Sorry, I don’t understand what you’re saying. I don’t speak bullsh*t
/r/MensRights29/07/19 08:14 AM
1

The tip of the foreskin is a purposeful defect that G-D put their on purpose to be removed. If you never had a foreskin, what makes you think it is so good?
/r/MensRights29/07/19 07:23 AM
1

Cutting off the middle finger would never be prescribed G-D. If you wait to cure phimosis, then they end up with a low and tight circumcision. Also linden sclerosus is another example of a condition where cutting off the tip of the foreskin is helpful. Would you rather have all the skin of the penis without the tip or would you rather end up with a low and tight circumcision later in life. Please understand that what I am referring to is minimal compared to the male genital mutilation that happe…
/r/MensRights29/07/19 05:54 AM
1

Replace foreskin and shaft skin with clitoral hood and labia minora
/r/MensRights29/07/19 04:30 AM
1

I think circumcising is fine, but they should not tear the mucous membrane from the glans. Why is everyone so extreme. Either they cut off to much or they cut nothing off. Cutting off the tip of the foreskin is the way to go. It would prevent phimosis and para-phimosis and in addition it would be known as the biblical circumcision. They circumcised me so tightly, I believe my parents should have chosen partial circumcision as I described above.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 04:13 AM
2

“You must not eat the blood of any creature, the life of every creature is it’s blood; anyone who eats it must be cut off.” (Leviticus 17:14).
/r/MensRights26/07/19 02:57 PM
1

Well it actually does tie into trans because they need to turn the foreskin into the clitoral hood, but if the man was circumcised it will make it harder to make a neo vagina.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 10:01 AM
1

The difference I have noticed is that the medical circumcisions tends to leave more tissue whereas the jewish circumcisions remove as much tissue as possible. There is so much variation that it is hard to contemplate which one is worse in modern times. The bottom line is that the inner epithelium should still be fused to the epithelium of the glans after all circumcisions. All circumcisions in modern times tear these delicate layers apart, which can cause infection. In addition the mucous membra…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 05:38 AM
1

What is really bad in this situation is that the modern day jewish circumcision is a brutal mutilation as compared to the original biblical circumcision. They tear the inner lining of the foreskin from the glans, which ends up causing extra pain. I am jewish myself and I am disgusted with what was done to me. I would have been happy if the original circumcision was done on me, which would just cut off the redundant foreskin that extends beyond the glans. The modern practice is fraud as it actual…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 03:15 AM
1

The partial circumcision I am talking about is not performed at all, so nobody understands it. Imagine if the partial circumcision prevented having a complete circumcision later in life. You see what I mean?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 06:00 AM
1

But think about it in another way. Imagine the partial circumcision where the head of penis is partially covered has health benefits and would decrease the risk of having issues later on, which is why I believe that the average of the 2 states beats both extremes, but I get what you are saying. If I had it my way, I would have been partially circumcised with the head partially covered. Cutting off the frenulum is absolutely disgusting to do to a man. I am lucky that somehow my frenulum was never…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 05:11 AM
1

I completely understand. There is something called a frenulum sparing circumcision. That one only cuts off the tip, which is not as bad. The tip is what causes phimosis. I have seen these circumcisions online where they remove everything including: ridged band,frenulum, and inner foreskin. That is so unacceptable to do to a baby. To me that’s equivalent to cutting off the clitoris in a woman. Whenever I had happy times in my life. All the sudden, this feeling of incompleteness rushed over me wit…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:21 AM
1

But think about it in another way. Imagine the partial circumcision where the head of penis is partially covered has health benefits and would decrease the risk of having issues later on, which is why I believe that the average of the 2 states beats both extremes, but I get what you are saying. If I had it my way, I would have been partially circumcised with the head partially covered. Cutting off the frenulum is absolutely disgusting to do to a man. I am lucky that somehow my frenulum was never…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 06:49 PM
1

The medical one is terrible because they generally remove the sensitive tissue whereas in the jewish circumcisions it’s a mixed bag. I have seen lots of circumcisions on YouTube. They generally remove more tissue in the jewish circumcisions whereas the medical ones appear to remove less tissue, but they make sure they remove the sensitive tissue. It’s really mixed. Partial circumcision sounds positive though. Would you have been happier with a partial circumcision where they only cut off the end…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:05 AM
1

I know exactly where you are coming from. As I have feelings about it too. The only way to beat your depression is to start restoring. I have been restoring for the last 4 months. I had no say either. Prior to restoring my penis had the appearance of a high and very tight circumcision where the skin would break open upon erection as I was a grower. If I had the choice, I would have been circumcised high and loose such that the glans would be partially covered. This would give me the health benef…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 04:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter