~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".I've said it previously, it would be different if the age gap were smaller but as it stands I don't believe a 14 year old can establish informed consent with a 19 year old. i agree. im not saying it's not rape. i'm saying that it sounds a lot worse than it potentially if you call in non-consensual even if it was that in the eyes of the law. i'm just against painting the guy as a violent rapemonster when in reality he's probably just a real slimebag rapist. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 05:56 PM |
| 2 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".Very, very few middle schoolers are going to possess the mental and emotional maturity to walk away from a high schooler's peer pressure. and does that mean that this guy necessarily pressured her into this? fuck the law, i'm talking about THIS CASE. it is a heavier accusation to say that he FORCED her into sex. hell, even if neither of us thought it mattered (i think it matters) whether he did or not, there are certainly people who do think it matters, and it is not fair to misinform those peop… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 05:38 PM |
| 0 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".In the eyes of the law, that definition includes the social force an adult weilds over a child. i don't care about the law. i never talked about the law. this is purely practical: did he FORCE her to have sex? physically, or even just through verbal threats? if he didn't, why should we imply he did? it would just not be factual. i am NOT trying to defend what the guy did here. i think it was wrong. i am trying to defend him from being accused of fucking some kid while she was crying for him to s… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 05:34 PM |
| 6 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".Any form of coercion that results in sex is nonconsensual/sexual assault either in the form of physical or emotional threats. ok, hypotethical situation: a 19 year old asks a 13 year old in clear words, with no apparent pressure "do you want to have sex?". the child replies "yes". another hypotethical: a 19 year old rapes a 13 year old at knife point while the 13 year old is crying. are these equivalent? neither is acceptable in my opinion, but i find it weird that you would argue that one isn't… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 05:30 PM |
| 3 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".yes they can. i mean this is just semantics, but a child can say "yes" to sex. morally it is still wrong, i dont disagree, but they can certainly "consent". | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 05:25 PM |
| 11 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".and she voluntarily assents to sex, are we going to call that "consent," even though most would assume that there is some exerted pressure in the relationship? uh, yes? i mean we would not necessarily do that, but "even though most would assume that there is some exerted pressure in the relationship?" is NOT an argument in your favor. that's just an argumentum ad populum fallacy. so what if most people believe that, that doesn't mean it's the truth lol i don't think a 19 year old should have sex… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 03:46 PM |
| 30 | DailyMail goes full retard: calls a 14yo girl who had consensual sex with 19yo man a "rape attack victim" -- while on the same front page calls a 28yo woman who had sex with underage boy a "inappropriate relationship".he didn't necessarily force her into sex tho (depending on your definition of the word forced). i dont think you should be unfair to rapists. they deserve the shit for being rapists, but they dont deserve any extra shit. you shouldn't make it out like he fucked her with a knife to her throat if he didn't. edit: I AM NOT defending the guy for what he did. i think it was wrong. i just think we should call it what it is. edit: might as well fan the flames too a bit; it is completely possible the gi… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/16 03:41 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter