TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

friendlylex Archive

View 0 posts and 99 comments by friendlylex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You are correct from a technical standpoint, of course. However, a DDoS attack doesn't have to be particularly effective in order to be illegal. It merely has to be an abuse of a networked system's resources in a way that would prevent or diminish its intended use. I think reporting these people would be justified.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 04:01 PM
1

You are correct from a technical standpoint, of course. However, a DDoS attack doesn't have to be particularly effective in order to be illegal. It merely has to be an abuse of a networked system's resources in a way that would prevent or diminish its intended use. I think reporting these people would be justified.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 04:01 PM
0

I don't think manual operation disqualifies it from being DDoS.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 03:24 PM
5

Your role as a teacher demands that you do no less. Teachers also have a duty to educate students on their civic duties.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 02:48 PM
9

Ignore it. SRS has been brigading TheRedPill threads over the past few weeks.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 07:46 AM
18

With objective alpha traits, it honestly doesn't matter what his personality is like. He might enjoy raping females at gunpoint, and females will go, oh, he has such creative fantasies in bed!
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 07:40 AM
2

Only 40% did. Small error.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 07:38 AM
1

How is properly sampled, objective data ever controversial?
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 07:37 AM
3

Doublethink is the use of misrepresentative, contrarian language, in order to try and erase the negative reality of certain events and entities. For example, the ministry of torture/execution is called the Ministry of Love. That sort of thing.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 06:07 AM
1

Doing it by yourself would not be DDoS, but it appears that multiple people are organizing to do it concurrently at one time.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 06:01 AM
4

Isn't this technically a DDoS? GitHub should be informed and they should probably go to law enforcement.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 11:36 PM
8

Doublethink.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 11:35 PM
30

This may have been true for first wave, but it is not true for second or third wave. Women have moved on to figuring out ways to acquire the rewards associated with being a man, without putting in the work or taking the risk. There's talk of being equal, and protests and lobbying designed to attain equal rewards, but that's it. They've been succeeding here and there. This is bad news for civilization. Because the work needs to be done, and the risks need to be taken, for civilization to advance,…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 10:25 AM
0

If you had actually read the comments, you would have realized that most commenters are calling bullshit on the study. Silent types do not get the girl.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 12:40 PM
1

Silence all the time = Omega. Or dead.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 12:38 PM
4

Yes, you're most certainly SRS, and you can't steal my right to a response. When you lie, I have the right to call you out on it. You're a lying piece of shit. You're a thread invading SRS piece of shit. I'm calling you out. Deal with it, you fucking bigot.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 03:40 AM
3

How small is your brain, to think that an insult like that would have any effect whatsoever on this sub's regulars?
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 03:28 PM
0

Women are already as wary as they're ever going to get. They've been gaming men (and colluding among each other) for thousands of years. Your warning is useless and meaningless.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 03:28 PM
-4

There's no debate to be had. You invaded the thread and launched a personal attack on the OP in your very first message. Your first move was a losing move. Later, sucker.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 03:22 PM
-1

I would. You're from SRS. And you're fucked up. Hey, look at at. Not only would I say it, I actually did go ahead and say it.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 03:03 PM
2

Life's not fair. You're just very careless.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 02:43 PM
-2

He's from SRS, so are you, and both of you are fucked up.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 02:42 PM
2

I know exactly what you look like IRL.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 01:53 PM
1

You're the SRS cunt invading this thread with vitriol. You need to stop projecting.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 01:40 PM
2

The only pussy that an SRSer will ever get is the 17 cats she lives with.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 01:39 PM
1

Try reading SRS sometime.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 12:53 PM
-2

... spoken like an SRS cunt.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 12:53 PM
0

Have you tried taking your own advice?
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 12:53 PM
-3

... or an SRS cunt like yourself, right? Because who better to advise men on how to be happy?
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 12:51 PM
2

The user may be a troll, but the principle certainly isn't. A number of users have moved on to doing this full time. /u/mycherrycrush comes to mind.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 10:16 AM
-1

You made a claim you can't prove. That's the point.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:05 AM
-1

That's not a meteor, that's a meteorite. And the meteorite itself didn't hit anyone, only one of its fragments did. Try harder.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:50 AM
3

As long as it's real actors, and not CGI or prosthetics, it's realistic and real. It may be difficult to achieve, or genetically rare, but that doesn't make it any more unreal than, say, a straight flush in poker.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 02:47 AM
-1

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:30 AM
-5

Second and third wave feminism did. You certainly contribute to it.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:20 AM
-6

Under the current, institutionally misandric legal climate, I'm not taking even the smallest risk to myself for the welfare of any woman or child. You should have thought about this before you destroyed the social contract in women's favor. It's too late to turn back the clock now.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:54 AM
-13

It's happened.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:46 AM
-6

guaranteed to have a wretched, awful existence These rules minimize their chances of being abused by the institutional misandry of the justice system. It's certainly less wretched and awful than the alternative of being victimized by it. You sound upset.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:45 AM
1

The scientific definition of life is not mine and it is not subjective. It is universal and objective. Please go waste someone else's time.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 03:26 PM
1

Once something becomes alive, its status as alive is not revoked until it dies. The scientific definition of life is not an argument. It's the only objective metric that we have. Your demagoguery is tiring and ineffective.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 03:22 PM
1

It's the scientific definition of life. There is no scope for a personal take on this. Of course, most jurisdictions stay well on the side of caution by only allowing abortions in the first trimester anyway, so the borderline case that you're suggesting would hardly ever arise.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 03:07 PM
1

Scientifically, one of the requirements for life is homeostasis, that is, the ability of the organism to balance the body's metabolism independently, without depending on any other host organisms. Reviewing the literature on premature births and their survival rates, we can confidently say that a fetus can only achieve homeostasis (and can therefore be considered alive) sometime in the third trimester, and no earlier than that.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 02:55 PM
1

international Men's Day Turns out one exists. It's November 19. I wouldn't have known about it if I hadn't looked it up. There's certainly no media push for its awareness. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Men%27s_Day
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 01:56 PM
1

but if you actually look at pictures/videos of abortion it will make you think twice You can say the exact same thing about sausage production. Sausage isn't a metaphor for anything here, I mean actual sausages. The production process is disgusting. But the result is good and it works well enough for millions.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 01:53 PM
1

Seriously, California is home to the movie industry, the modelling industry, and the porn industry. It's a gold mine not just in the literal sense.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 12:49 PM
2

Also, if you're in the movie biz, at whatever level, you're probably fucking women hotter than what 99% of the world population fucks, even if they're not necessarily very famous.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 11:39 AM
1

What if 10 years later, your name is in a small font in the credits at the end of the movie? You're still making better money than 99% of the world population.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 08:43 AM
0

Women fantasize about being raped by men whom they've already pre-approved for mating. The act of rape, in that case, is simply further data proving the strength of the pre-approved male. They don't fantasize about (nor would they likely respond positively to) being raped by men whom they haven't pre-approved for mating, regardless of whether they manage to overpower them (and, let's face it, it doesn't take much to overpower a female). In short, women want to be objectified by men whom they've …
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 08:43 AM
8

Women fantasize about being raped by men whom they've already pre-approved for mating. The act of rape, in that case, is simply further data proving the strength of the pre-approved male. They don't fantasize about (nor would they likely respond positively to) being raped by men whom they haven't pre-approved for mating, regardless of whether they manage to overpower them (and, let's face it, it doesn't take much to overpower a female). In short, women want to be objectified by men whom they've …
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 08:36 AM
0

I quoted from your very own source.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 06:48 AM
0

masculine divorcé, feminine divorcée That's right. Thank you.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 06:20 AM
1

You're ignoring the authoritative Cambridge Dictionary in favor of some shitty blog. You're ignorant.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:52 AM
0

There's no difference between the two. The only acceptable forms are what can be documented as being correct in authoritative sources. Everything else is ignorance. You are being ignorant.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:39 AM
-1

The non-genderedness of English is true in general, but there are exceptions for a number of French-derived words, including fiance/fiancee and divorce/divorcee. (This is to say, you're wrong on fiance, also.) http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/american-english/divorce_2 http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/american-english/divorcee http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/american-english/fiance
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 06:22 AM
3

Both English counterparts derive from the original French, without change of spelling.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 05:53 AM
5

A divorcee is a female.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 04:56 AM
-3

Women want handsome, rich, famous men to dote on them. Did this really need two pages of analysis? Sorry.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 10:39 AM
-12

Oddly enough, feminists don't seem to think enthusiastic consent is necessary when a tranny is trying to pass herself off as a real woman to a man. Some real integrity, there.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:27 AM
16

She has a point. Being impregnated by unhealthy beta seed is not sexually attractive to women. But being impregnated by healthy alpha seed is, even through rape, and possibly especially through rape. Of course, she doesn't have enough honesty or self-awareness to say this right out, so she has to wrap it up in euphemisms.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 06:15 AM
0

Can't a man dress like a woman while sporting a full beard and not get called a joke? Stop gender policing, shitlord!
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:37 PM
-1

No methodology? Not surprised.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 09:11 AM
-1

I'm really curious as to how the fuck you would know anything about unreported rapes, since they are, by definition, unreported. Describe methodology. Also, the Wikipedia entry on false rape accusations lists rates between 2% and 90% (not between 2% and 8%, as you claimed) with most of them around 50%.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:44 AM
-1

I'm sorry, but you're describing feminists here, not atheists.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:39 AM
0

What joke? It's a sensible and necessary protest against institutional misandry.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:37 AM
2

Not anymore. They started a low hanging fruit brigade a few days ago. They've been invading /r/iamgoingtohellforthis/, /r/mensrights/, /r/theredpill/, among others.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 05:05 AM
-4

There aren't. Citation needed if you claim that there are.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:12 AM
1

That's the only love they're ever getting.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 11:50 PM
1

It's easier because there is close to zero critical risk -- for example, of losing your last cent and ending up homeless. You eat less, you go to the gym, you end up hot. Guaranteed. Not so when building a financial fortune. There, every decision you make involves risk, some potentially catastrophic.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 11:48 PM
5

The well-known hate group SRSpower has targeted your comment. They're on their way here. Not that they'll ever manage to change minds or anything, because they consist of women and manginas.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 11:46 PM
4

As long as you're not explicitly lying about something, you're in the clear.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 11:35 PM
-2

I'll bet you anything she didn't even register the hypocrisy there. That's the female brain for you. Completely lacking the self-awareness lobe.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 11:34 PM
1

Not in Feministan, they don't.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 11:12 PM
0

It's all about exchange of value. What can a woman give me, that she expects anything in return? They rarely have anything to give, except sex, that I can't already do myself, and better!
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 11:09 PM
2

You were probably already getting way more attention than your fair share, so that's not saying much. You went from a 9.9 to a 9.99.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 09:08 PM
12

Girls don't need game. Spreading their legs suffices.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 06:50 AM
-1

You're yet another SRS idiot.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 02:15 AM
8

they don't want to be in charge They don't want to pay for their own shit, either.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 12:43 AM
-5

Verbatim SRS closer. You fucking zombies.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:10 PM
-4

You're just not aware of how much you give away with your tone. It's like a fingerprint. And it's hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:06 PM
-4

You SRSers can't do this undercover shit, because you slip up all the time. Even your recent post history is full of SRS identifiers. Just let it go. You've been made. We know who you are and what you're here for. Stop trying. It's useless.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:03 PM
-4

You invaded this thread as part of SRS's low fruit invasion plan. You are attacking the person, as opposed to their ideas. You are a fucking organized hate group, targeting primarily white men (though numerous others, too, but primarily that). All the above substantiates your misandry.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:59 PM
-5

Thread invasion. Hatefulness. Character assassination. You are supporting all this misandric crap. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:55 PM
-8

And I'm talking about that SRSer's shamelessly thread-invading, hateful, character-assassinating post, and by extension, yours, for supporting that misandric crap. Both of you are fucked up. But maybe not as much as Laurelai. That's a big maybe.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:53 PM
-2

All SRS posts are fucked up. I don't think it's fair to single out any particular one as more fucked up than others. Maybe Laurelai's stuff. Is he/she/it still around?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:49 PM
1

Your posts are on the record, and I invite everyone to read them. This argument is over. P.S. You can't even keep track of whom you're talking to, which is just hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:40 PM
2

Sorry, I'm not the feminist here, you are. And you're even stupid enough to think that you can fool the people here into thinking that you're an antifeminist, even as you spout your typical feminist bullshit. How stupid is that? Pretty fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 09:40 PM
1

That's impossible. Nothing can be as stupid as feminism.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:46 PM
2

You talked about your fee fees and nothing but your fee fees. Nobody cares about your fee fees. Shut the fuck up about your fee fees already. You're claiming that a man working to make women's lives better is sexist against women. That's literally insane. You're literally insane.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:40 PM
-2

You're SRS. You're literally a bigot. Who the fuck are you to talk.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:07 PM
-5

Hey, I know you. You're one of the invaders that came here as part of SRS's recent low fruit invasion plan.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:06 PM
2

This argument isn't about your fee fees. Nobody cares about your fee fees. Shut the fuck up about your fee fees already.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:05 PM
5

It's simply because females who rape males are almost never properly punished, so the rare cases where sane judges makes just judgments become newsworthy. The problem is not institutional racism. The problem is institutional misandry and female privilege. This must be fought and torn down.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:36 AM
1

s/demeaning/threatening
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 02:39 AM
25

Thanks for reminding me that this was supposed to be a wine review. It reads more like a therapist session transcript.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 08:14 AM
2

Here's yet another example of feminism literally destroying civilization. Literally. They want to destroy all the science that goes against their cuckoo crazy ideologies.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 03:39 AM
9

The most recent data shows Reddit getting 112,163,255 unique visitors a month. This means that being a Reddit visitor is 1304 times as common as being a /r/MensRights member. Of course, it's still a relatively uncommon phenomenon when compared against the entire world's population, but it would be disingenuous to highlight this uncommonality on Reddit, because every visitor to Reddit is, by definition, familiar with visiting Reddit. It wouldn't be newsworthy to them. It might be newsworthy on so…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 01:31 AM
-1

You can take a survey on a representative sample of men, and find out what percentage of men find something interesting. That way, you can find out whether that interest is uncommon or common. Once again, do you have any data, one way or the other, or are you simply talking out of your ass, the way you usually do?
/r/MensRights02/03/14 01:14 AM
11

Compared to a little more than 3.5 billion men on the planet, yeah, it's uncommon.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 01:13 AM
-1

It's not subjective. You can determine it with objective data. Do you have any data, one way or the other, or are you simply talking out of your ass, the way you usually do?
/r/MensRights02/03/14 12:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter