TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

friendofalltehworld Archive

View 2 posts and 259 comments by friendofalltehworld on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Dunno about the others but MenLib is obviously a bad faith sub run by feminists with only the loosest grasp on the jargon they use, designed to funnel men though a sort of threadbare propaganda mill. The zealous use of comment deletion, instabanning and extremely adversarial pushback to any questioning of their orthodoxy indicates a space designed to foster obedience, not argument or insight. Very much like any other feminist space you will find on reddit. Any pushback is heresy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/21 02:55 PM
0

Your comment is pathetic and you are obviously just trolling. Get a life mate. Being a sad sack is hardly an accomplishment.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 02:07 PM
0

Jesus. For more information please re-read my comment. Or maybe find something else to do.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 04:21 PM
5

Heroic dad spent 20 years searching for his son who was snatched by a female human trafficker (Worldwide, 38% of the suspected perpetrators of human trafficking are female) After his son was abducted in 1997, Mr Guo travelled around the country on the back of a motorbike chasing tip-offs. He is said to have spent his life savings on his mission, sleeping under bridges and begging for money when he ran out of cash. Most fathers, like most mothers, will do anything in their power for their kids. T…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 08:22 AM
1

Its relevant because they displayed sexism against men. I'm referring to the stream not this reddit thread btw,.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:55 AM
1

The first comment in the twitch stream he linked to, in which there was sexism against men.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:54 AM
1

Trafficking is already a crime. Kidnap is a crime. Unlawful detainment etc. The only reason prostitution is illegal in this particular way - women allowed to sell, men not allowed to buy - women not allowed to cooperate together, is to make it seem like it's compassionate towards the women, whereas in fact it is the same sex negative authoritarian shit the church used to promulgate - and for the exact same reason; prevent sex happening outside relationships. The creators of these laws hate and f…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:25 AM
1

How would that be mathematically possible?
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:16 AM
-1

Note the first comment at the top states "no sexism". "-Be friendly !!!!!!!!! - No sexism (immediate ban)- No racism (immediate ban)- No bullying- No swearing- No theology- No politics- Don't discuss illicit drugs"
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:14 AM
7

I always find it instructive that the kinds of people who ascribe to the use of a divisive and pejorative framing like 'toxic masculinity' seem keen to reinforce that behaviour by telling men who disagree to shut up and that their feelings don't matter. Got a problem men? Then shut up and man up!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 01:00 PM
1

Which studies? Sounds made up to me.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 09:29 AM
1

It wasn't abandoned everywhere, only in some places. But the implicit bias against men remains in the judicial system.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 09:26 AM
1

'Men are rapists' is a stereotype that harms men. And it’s a stereotype that feminism supports and reinforces with slogans like 'teach men not to rape' as if Rapists are merely mistaken or confused and men are just walking around raping left right and centre because they don't know any better. Feminist spaces on reddit are packed with negative generalizations like the following: "Men don't have to say that they have contempt for us, they prove it every day." "Men are pigs plain and simple!" Or t…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 09:23 AM
1

No, it's only about rejecting stereotypes that victimise women while at the same time reinforcing negative stereotypes about men. That's the main problem we have with it. Look at any article by a feminist - packed with negative stereotypes and generalisations about men. Look at any feminist sub; every negative generalisation about men is upvoted and lauded.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:48 AM
2

Centre Right Jess phillips is 'centre right'? ​ they have to deal with the issues that all working class and poor people face, which includes men ​ get a load of this thread
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 04:18 PM
4

I was banned from /r/labour for contributing to a conversation about this, where I was trying to figure out ways Labours' message was not resonating with voters (they had just lost yet another seat). I was banned for, and I quote: "Note from the moderators:the jordanpeterson sub is the sub of incels" The comment I had written had nothing to do with Jordan Peterson, nor am I member of that sub. Nor have I made a post on that sub. (Nor is there anything wrong with that sub). I was objecting to the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 03:52 PM
2

I think the main reform here is to raise the wages of cops drastically and bust up the police union.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 10:06 AM
15

In my personal experience with American police forces, they seem very poorly trained. Hyper-aggressive, and plain rude. It's like they are trying to get people's backs' up. I can compare and contrast with other police forces since I've lived in a lot of different countries. US cops are the worst by far. There's an institutional problem there for sure. And I concur with the assessment made my many in the Black Lives Matter movement that they are more like an army of occupation than an organisatio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 08:27 AM
3

because women aren’t good enough to get away with it more than once! ...or they are so good, they get away with it far more and never get caught.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 03:11 PM
25

Thread locked due to "the unfortunate presence of men in the comments using this post to gracelessly generalize women." ​ While practically every other comment gracelessly generalises men.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 03:10 PM
3

"Opinions on acceptable male behaviour vary by age, sex and nationality". Opinions on acceptable female behavior? How dare you even ask!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 03:02 PM
10

The failed fact check quote they present as evidence of AVFM's untrustworthiness actually comes from another site and the evidence used to debunk the claim came from AVFM. Whoever wrote that was drunk or high.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 03:01 PM
3

It looks like one person's opinion and that person is likely pro-feminist. Therefore worthless. And the one example of a failed fact check they give appears to come from an entirely different website, 'the water pipe'. And best of all, The recording used to debunk the fartrape myth was made by....AVFM! Very sloppy And/or LIES.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 02:43 PM
4

Most people would use the casual label the left to describe the nature of the establishment culture. For instance I vote for parties which are left of centre social democratic and green. They would definitely be considered left wing by US standard (hell, by US standards they would probably be considered communist). And the ideological capture of those parties by identity politics is making me take a hard look at the alternatives. I need to see climate change solved and better funding for social …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 11:21 AM
2

ho are here to just argue and troll for the sake of it. Wait - who is here to argue for any other reason? Are you getting paid?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 01:50 PM
5

Yep. Today's gospel is very much the same as yesterdays. It's just conservative morality dressed up as social activism. Thou shalt not question authority. And as always, the kids will rebel and we'll end up thanking them for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 01:40 PM
10

I've been against "the man" all my life. In the 70's and 80's that was conservative Christianity. Today 'the man' is hyper leftwing orthodoxy, another thought-quenching authoritarian cult. Thing is, the left don't really understand that they are the establishment now and continue to act and believe like they are the counterculture. But the targets of both groups of sanctimonious pricks are the same sorts of subculture groups as before; comedians, nerds, computer games and 'the youth of today' et…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 12:10 PM
20

Many men lead hard lives of quiet desperation. Many men were abused by women in their formative years. And many men have trouble coping with a society that tells them they do not need help and are lesser beings without complex emotions. You're not on your own, man. But the kind of words of strangers on the internet or some affirmation from people like me, is no substitute for having real relationships with people that value your contribution. My advice is to join groups where you can help people…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 09:23 AM
2

He also forced the British out of India, so there's that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 09:17 AM
1

​ but why don't lesbians love me? Reminds me of that scene in Chasing Amy. "Alright, now see this? This is a four-way road, OK? And dead in the center is a crisp, new, hundred dollar bill. Now, at the end of each of these streets are four people, OK? Are you following?Holden: Yeah.Banky Edwards: Good. Over here, we have a male-affectionate, easy to get along with, non-political agenda lesbian. Down here, we have a man-hating, angry as f***, agenda of rage, bitter dyke. Over here, we got Santa Cl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 09:14 AM
3

I mean it comes across as hostile to homosexual identity as well. It's the original homophobic slur.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 09:10 AM
7

The message these self imagined progressives are sending is that it's not okay for boys or men to have close friendships. There's always an erotic subtext. It's ALWAYS gay. Want to share your feelings and develop close emotional bonds with another guy? So gay, bro! Which is not much different than the sort of slurry homophobic knuckle-dragging troglodytes spurt out from their orifaces in place of speech.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 09:00 AM
7

want to move up in social class if possible This is perfectly logical however.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 08:55 AM
4

Yes all that woman-spreading and woman-splaining, and female tears mugs. Definitely it's women's foibles being excoriated in social media and society at large, never men. Hey I'm just pale, male and stale, so never mind me. You'd never despise an old cis-het white man for just being alive. AhemKill all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 08:53 AM
1

if a woman dates a man that is the same or lower size/strength as her, then she is dating someone with weaker genes That's not how genes work. Also I dated a woman who was a pro-boxer and she was definitely stronger and faster than me. And you want to hear her hit the heavy bag! It sounded like a truck rear ending a Honda.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 08:51 AM
0

Oh because I thought he meant the one that caused hundreds of years of wild bloody war in Europe, culminating in a state wide torture program, the persecution of all other religions and a global program of genocidal forced conversion and wealth extraction 'for Jesus'. Of course these days it's just some rampant pedophillia, and a ban on abortion and prophylactics. But call me when there's a female Pope. Any day now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 07:27 AM
2

Only pretentious snobs go to art museums just to pretend like they get it You said "Only pretentious snobs go to art museums". It's there in black and white. Pull your head out of your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 07:23 AM
5

I go to art museums. Not really 'pretentious' if you happen to like art. If you don't like art, don't sweat it, but don't go around thinking you're superior in some way. That's snobbery, my man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 10:51 AM
4

No, it says a lot about the OP and his banal outlook on life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 10:50 AM
1

FDS is just a bunch of incels. Female incels. Female extremism doesn't result in mass shootings though, but it does result in societal changes. Many of which ultimately do not benefit said women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 09:08 AM
4

FDS is just a bunch of incels. Female incels. Female extremism doesn't result in mass shootings though, but it does result in societal changes. Many of which ultimately do not benefit said women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 09:08 AM
4

Sample comments from one top thread today: "Women with diminished resources desperately need to pull away from men, and only interact with them using FDS-type principles. Even men who should have empathy for women just fake it, and exploit the women all the same." - 109 upvotes. ​ "Honestly, fuck nerds. They're the most sexist of all men" - 48 upvotes. ​ "I follow a lot of more left leaning political forums on here (and am extremely left leaning myself) but there's a special sort of woke misogyn…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 08:56 AM
2

In a nutshell, it's because violent crime is such a rare experience. But nobody, man or woman in their right mind wants to walk home at night, especially while drunk or impaired. Disregarding risk entirely is foolish and...risky.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/21 08:12 AM
5

Boys spend a lot of their time engaging in risky behaviour. They are playing at managing risk. Thus when they get older men have a at least some idea of the actual risk involved in various activities as opposed to the perceived risk. (On average of course. I know an 'extreme sports' type woman who does things so dangerous that even watching them gives me a nosebleed). Statistically speaking, walking home at night etc, is NOT risky. Comparitively speaking, driving on a highway is vastly more risk…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/21 08:07 AM
1

"(belonging to a religion I shall not name) " ​ You can mention Christianity here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/21 07:53 AM
9

From that linked article, I love this attitude: ​ "I was the manager of the household**, and that being manager was a lot of thankless work"** And of course this is the only management that is going on in a married couple's life. The money just grows on a tree out the back. The finances arrange themselves. The property is self sustaining. Also who wants to bet her labours are not thankless? Complaints like this indicate a lazy SOB who thinks everyone else is an NPC. Meanwhile the actual emotiona…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/21 07:25 AM
8

Like do you think women want to hear some men think we are branch swingers incapable of love lol. Of course not, but there are coherent, organised pejorative descriptions of all sort of male behaviour. Much of it, if not entirely innocuous, at least shared in large part by women. Typical male behaviour is now endlessly mocked or even legislated against, from the way men sit, to the way men answer questions. The way men are sexually attracted to women is described as everything from shallow, to o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 10:08 AM
1

Why not go full intersectional on this - why stop at women and children first? First house the Womenandchildren Then house the Black men. Then house the GBTQI+ men. Then house the white male CEO's, Kings and Emperors. Who's left after that? No-one, obviously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/21 09:46 AM
1

The widespread abuses of the paedophile Catholic Church give lie to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 08:03 AM
1

Am a man. Have faked orgasms.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 02:38 PM
2

Get to the Klondike before everyone else and stake me claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 02:27 PM
4

I moved out from home aged 16, travelled to another continent by 18 and set up a business there at 20. My dad was a military pilot at 22. My grandfather commanded a squadron at that age. My grandmother managed a farm. You think nobody should have dated them because they were too young? Christ almighty.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 09:00 AM
5

Ah this is another branch of organised religion. Let's differentiate them so we tell the correct ones from the incorrect ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/21 08:49 AM
6

The patriarchy surrounds us and penetrates us; it binds the galaxy together!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/21 08:46 AM
1

No that's your logic. I don't see "still being alive" as the only dividing line between necessity and want. Ive made that very clear. Once more since you are repeatedly not getting it: sex is a necessity or minimum requirement - for a life free of suffering
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 07:58 AM
1

For example you can kill hookers in GTA This belies the fact that you can kill anyone in the game. It's a city simulation. Since hookers exist, they can be killed. The real question is, should they remove all women, so that no women can be killed? Is that more progressive? Or remove killing, so it's a game here everyone just has tea and crumpets together? Or does their taxes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 03:35 PM
1

They are RPGs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 03:31 PM
3

It would be interesting to comment on the number of times a man is killed or abused in RDR or GTA storylines in contrast with the number of times a woman is killed or abused. If possible I'd include sections of conversation between Arthur and Mary Linton. The question poser obviously has only heard of GTA from Fox News reports and feminist bullshit blogs. The nexus of right wing fear mongering over computer games and feminist fear mongering over computer games is also an interesting topic. Are m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 03:30 PM
1

I don't recall any first person shooter being described as 'misogynistic'. Maybe games like GTA, which are not first person shooters. But perhaps this is nitpicking, what they probably mean is quasi-realistic 3D games that can have shooting in them. But of course any entertainment aimed at males is going to be "described as 'misogynistic" at some point - since there's clout and kudos aplenty for the feminist blogger that does it. Conversely there's little to be gained by some random dude moaning…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 03:22 PM
3

Im not in agreement with that idea or anything - these are just the historical facts. The crime of Buggery was outlawed by the Buggery act of 1533 and by extension homosexuality for men was and women not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 03:09 PM
2

For me it is to make people aware of the social injustices which men face and which are making western society a far worse place for families (including single parent families), children and the less well off. These are mainly father's rights but also mens' treatment in the justice system, education system and the lack of care for vulnerable men and boys. All of which is enforced and reinforced by a virulently anti-male bias in the media fuelled by the perfidious propaganda of an increasingly bi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 09:12 AM
-5

Male homosexuality was not outlawed, Buggery was. It fucks with the chain of command on HM Navy, and that's the answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/21 09:06 AM
–

Which unchanged "fact" is the "it" that "makes these men look like pigs"? Question: Are you religious at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 08:31 AM
–

Debatable. Plenty of homeless people are still alive, despite not being housed. What's your definition of necessity? I would argue while the human libido exists, sex is a necessity or as I have stated a minimum requirement - for a life free of suffering. Witness the horrific abuses of Roman Catholic Church to see what a life without sex can drive men to. One cannot simply hand wave away a fundamental element of the human animals' instinct and all attempts to do so have resulted in abuse, horror …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/21 08:10 AM
1

You said no evidence. Now you are saying "biased". Any evidence that doesn't fit your bullshit narrative is always going to be 'biased', flat-earth style. This is how propaganda brainwashes people. All evidence to the contrary becomes 'suspect'. Again, where is your evidence that the majority of sex workers are coerced into it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 12:08 PM
1

It is a false perception, promulgated by those who wish to enforce a prohibition on prostitution, to the detriment of all those engaged in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 10:36 AM
1

where is your evidence that the majority of sex workers are coerced into it? There is no evidence THIS IS EVIDENCE: New Zealand legalized prostitution in 2003. A study by the New Zealand Ministry of Justice five years later found “no incidence of trafficking,”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 10:32 AM
2

I said “most other” professions, not “all” I know, I'm just pointing out that risk is associated with a great number of perfectly legal professions. mining doesn’t even exist as a profession in my country Really? no ore is extracted? no gravel pits? how does the construction industry obtain raw materials for essentials like concrete?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 10:28 AM
1

majority of the time, she isn’t working the corner of her own free will. This is pernicious propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:59 AM
1

Plenty of things are 'wants' like housing. Yet as a society we recognise that some wants are the minimum requirement for a life free of suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:56 AM
1

Thinking something should be legal is not the same as personally approving of it. = Not hypocritical Nordic Model supporter Is hypocritical because you're making it illegal for men but legal for women to engage in prostitution. You don't have to approve of it, but criminalising the purchaser while allowing the seller to operate freely is a much more than mere 'disproval'. It's allowing the state to deprive the purchaser of their liberty on the basis of some prudish morality that does not apply t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:53 AM
1

The risks for being a sex worker are off the chart compared to for most other professions. They are far, far lower than those incurred in mining, construction or fishing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:50 AM
1

It does, in fact, make you a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:37 AM
0

Professional athletes are also selling their bodies. As are coal miners and other manual labourers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:30 AM
1

the majority No, a tiny minority. The contrary view is the result of pervasive propaganda.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:30 AM
1

"Marriage has been proven to shorten a woman’s lifespan' That's debatable. ​ "Between 65 and 85 years, married men and women had a longer TLE (total life expectancy) and active life expectancy (ALE) than unmarried men and women. For example, at 65 years, TLE for married men was 18.6 years, 2.2 years longer than unmarried men, and ALE for married men was 12.3 years, 2.4 years longer than unmarried men. Similarly, at 65 years, TLE for married women was 21.1 years, 1.5 years longer than unmarried w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:07 AM
4

the false idea of the monstrous black male rapist Only white men can be rapists obviously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/21 10:15 AM
1

Assume you were. Apologies. Je retire.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:31 AM
2

Relationships are not valuable to me. Well there it is . You whine about incels a lot for someone who is obviously a hard case incel. Thought as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:30 AM
5

What about women wringing their hands over 'unwanted staring'? and the reaction thereof?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:21 AM
2

I just think it's completely blind to say men and women are the same, ...I just don't believe it, and that has nothing to do with disliking men. Totally agree with this, and that has nothing to do with disliking women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:19 AM
2

the sexes are different I agree. However the sexes being different goes away when feminists want to argue that it couldn't possibly be the case. For instanc,e when they point to the lower uptake of maths or physics based employment among women, particularly in engineering - suddenly the sexes are EXACTLY the same and any difference in interest can only be down to systemic sexism holding women back and no other factor whatsoever - and you are a misogynist and literally hitler for even thinking ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:17 AM
13

How sure are you of that 10x? When I worked as a bar waiter when I was 16-18, I got felt up, pinched or my rear slapped at least 2-3 times a night. Every night. If it had happened to a woman something would be done. The perps banned from the bar etc. As I was a boy, I was told to laugh it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:08 AM
3

Personally very much doubt this. I find men are generally more aggressive, confident and sexually forward. However, now that the definition of 'sexual harassment' includes 'any unwanted attention of a sexual nature' I'd wager 99.9% of all humans have been 'sexually harassed'. The concept is so diluted as to be meaningless, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 08:02 AM
-1

No one wants their convo interrupted by some guy who wants sex. What if he wants laughs, companionship or a relationship? You just know beforehand it's only about sex? And men only ever want just sex? Charming. ​ We don’t care. Oh dear the Queen of all Women has Spoken. ​ I’m not going back and forth with an arrogant self absorbed person While you're the soul of wit, reason and empathy? lol, get lost, creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 04:06 PM
1

You trying to find a girlfriend is not an excuse to insert yourself into someone’s space or conversation. Yes, it is. It absolutely is an excuse. It's called social interaction, your highness. People in bars and clubs very often talk to each other and strangers. They are public places where gregarious people typically like to have chats. This is not unusual. Many people meet their significant others this way. In fact meeting women at dances and 'chatting them up' used to be the only way. ​ I don…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 03:38 PM
2

Not to have men try and insert themselves in our convos (why do men do this?) To try and find a girlfriend, wife or partner. The onus is on men to strike up conversations, to approach, to make the first move. Women tend to go out in force - therefore if you want to talk to a one woman in particular, you need to try and join in the conversation at some point. I have done this sometimes and it has been welcomed, as it is often the case that they are actually there for some male attention - believe…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 03:28 PM
5

We’re not really interested in being hit on by men To be fair, you see this sentiment expressed far more often than something like "We're open to being approached by men" I would assume it is because reddit's female audience is in large part just as socially awkward, self-conscious and fearful (and in the same proportions) as it's male audience - within the younger teen-25 cohort. Growing up with social media has had an antisocial effect I fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 11:58 AM
3

If there is a demand, there will be a supply. Not always. If there's little or no supply consumers learn not to demand. People didn't want an SUV when all there was was steam trains.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 11:51 AM
67

Do men really have it easier? No the truth was more complex If, by more complex, you mean; no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 11:44 AM
1

It is not accurate to say only women pushed femenism. I didn't say they did. But I object to the idea that men and only men are to blame, as she said "men want everything to be equal" - what monsters we are!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 11:52 AM
3

None.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 10:37 AM
7

I think his phrase was "had to swing a Gucci loafer over the velvet rope".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 10:36 AM
2

fully half of them are privileged upper middle class, college educated men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 10:35 AM
3

but r/feminism is run by a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 10:34 AM
2

'feminism is fine, it just has some crazies' Then it isn't fine. It's corrupted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 10:25 AM
1

What of it? They're in the money business.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 10:14 AM
23

"Toxic masculinity" = Shut Up. "The patriarchy hurts men too" = Shut Up and Go Away.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 10:11 AM
1

No, they don't. They show only one side of the ledger. They only show unpaid work. They do not show paid work. "even though women work full time and pretty much as much as men" No, markedly less than. Here again, this BBC report shows that in the UK, Men work in total 51 Hours, women in total 50 hrs. Why ignore the science? what do you get out of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 02:39 PM
0

Mine is more recent and the gap in unpaid work in 4.9 hours for women and 3.8 for men. You're still not getting it. You are only taking onto account UNPAID work and totally ignoring paid work. If you don't like the age of the data show me a more recent study that shows both paid and unpaid work and not unpaid work alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 02:02 PM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/chapter-6-time-in-work-and-leisure-patterns-by-gender-and-family-structure/ All adults 18-64 Total working time for men: 45.6 hrs Total working time for women 45.2 You can argue men need to pick up the slack at home. You could then equally argue women need to pick up the slack at work. Either approach is foolish as it does not take into account the complimentary nature of partnerships. Why berate a whole gender when everyone is already doing t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 01:23 PM
1

Where's all your citations?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 01:11 PM
2

it also increases chance of divorce by 33% Oh I know. Women hate having house husbands. They prefer to be out earned by their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 01:11 PM
2

Same reason bored housewives do?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 12:42 PM
4

They specifically do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 12:41 PM
–

A dildo is an object. Porn (or the persistent viewing of porn) can turn women into objects (for the viewer's pleasure). It is very different. This doesn't follow. A dildo is a physical representation of a man's penis, in the same way a pornographic image is a pictorial representation of a woman. Both are representations. If you're going to be reductionist, do it fairly. The dildo reduces a man to his mere genetalia. It turns men into objects for the woman's pleasure. See? If anything a dildo is …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:47 AM
–

Try no eating. It will prove you are addicted to food.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:40 AM
–

ow do you feel about the fact that the majority of women don't orgasm from penetration though? Exactly - there's a huge asymmetry here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:33 AM
–

Social media is having an adverse impact on girls mental health, of that there's no doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:30 AM
–

that is not talked about or mentioned at all Sure, apart from everywhere, all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 09:25 AM
8

Well 'rights' is simply wrong word to use I think. Feminists don't call themselves "women's rights activists" and if they did it would seem very militant. MRA is a loaded term. And nobody really likes an activist. Especially not in a bar! Some gender equality issues affect men and it's good as a man to take notice of them because they are invisible to women. By labelling himself I think OP comes across as proselytising. "I'm interested in gender equality" would work better and then hit them upsi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/21 09:12 AM
5

I dunno, if you kick off with "I am a.." and go on to assert you are some sort of political thing, most people want to back away and put the fingers in the ears, whether that's I am a christian, or I am a feminist or whatever. But if you simply explain some of the issues - as issues, you get a lot more traction. "I'm for gender equality" would work better followed up by "here's some issues facing men you're probably not aware of - and they cause serious problems for all of society".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/21 09:07 AM
1

PS men who believe in egalitarianism in all things are also feminists In that case feminists are MRA's.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 08:50 AM
1

Good paid paternity leave would also help, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 08:44 AM
2

Theres studies showing that when you take all work into account, men work more hours than women. why get married? Increasingly people aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 08:43 AM
1

why don’t men step back and let women support them? Because they won't? I sure as hell don't see legions of women clamouring to financially support men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 08:41 AM
-7

On average? It could still be the case that most men are dullards and a few are extremely bright.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 02:31 PM
1

men aren't the ones organizing play dates or interacting with the schools as much as their wives do Maybe there would be less of this shit if they were. There's no goddam way I'd put up with anyone telling me how to raise my children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 02:23 PM
6

It isn't an economic necessity that fell out of the sky. It was a feminist ideology that posited that 'a career' - the thing men supposedly have, is your ticket to freedom, happiness and fulfilment. And they refused to listen to men telling them, No, it's more often soul destroying and thankless drudgery. They seemed to think the working day was spent in a relaxing spa, having affairs with secretaries in between neck massages.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 02:19 PM
-1

Do you seriously get teachers, school admins and paediatricians wagging the finger at you for your ;bad parenting;? Tell them to fuck off, surely?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 02:16 PM
3

There is a larger median of women who are, on average 'smarter than men' - as in have higher IQ's. In the top percentiles you see more men and in the bottom percentiles also. This is why you see more men at the top of competence based hierarchies and more men at the bottom. Since higher education now tends to focus less on excellence than on studies which require only median competence, you naturally see more women (bigger target market also). So that's a good reason for the gap. Another is sexi…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 02:09 PM
1

Women going their own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 02:02 PM
-1

Frankly speaking, I find the pathological hatred against trans people, prostitutes and pickmeishas quite pointless What about their pathological hatred of men, considering it's a sub supposedly designed to help women date men?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 02:01 PM
1

happy multi-generational families going to the park together, young people respecting their elders, and elders helping the young, bunch of kids playing outside, women having women conversations doing craft and making food together, old men drinking coffee at outdoor cafees and having half-day long conversations about old times yes, that's the South of France to a tee. Tres genteel.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:27 PM
11

Feminism is men's fault now? As far as I'm aware it wasn't men en masse, demanding that women become entirely independent of men, become breadwinners and thus halving the value of labour. The fish decided they didn't need bicycles, remember?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:21 PM
5

Woman now are expected to get a degree and get into work culture as hard as a man By whom? Men never demanded women get degrees or become breadwinners. I agree it's a SHITTY situation. But not just for the women. Also for the kids and also for the men who have seen their ability to support a family drop by 50% as wages for men have stayed right where they were in the 1980's yet the cost of living has doubled.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:21 PM
1

Not wanting children isn't normal It is, now. Question is why.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:17 PM
1

I dont have to fucking have children Good for you. Fuck the begrudgers. Its hard, thankless and expensive. I wouldn't wish my lovely kids away, but I wouldn't have another.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:17 PM
1

I do not day drink as it makes me fall asleep Have you tried Cava?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:14 PM
0

women are now expected By whom? Now you are supposed to constantly interact with your child or what? My wife got caught up in a sort of latter day "keeping up with the Joneses" treadmill of every increasing burdens of 'enlightened motherhood'. To me it seemed like peacocking, not better parenting. All the...gear. She expected me to increase my parenting intensity with similar zeal. It almost wrecked the marriage. But my own view - that some, if not, much of this was just crap, harmful even event…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:05 PM
1

And you think married fathers are 'free' or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:03 PM
1

in an "egalitarian" world where everyone is responsible for their own $$$ it's a lot safer to just go with the career You've hit the nail right on the head there.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 01:02 PM
1

"Now there’s so much mom shaming. You are looked down on if you are not fully focused on your kid." ​ I often wonder if this is real. Who exactly is 'looking down' on you? God? The editors of Vogue? Where is this shaming manifest? Is it spoken out loud? Written about? I would venture a hypothesis that this is merely imagined. Articles about the good life or parenting tips, being assessed as exhortations instead of proffered advice. A paranoia of sorts. I don't see men being so worried half so mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 12:59 PM
1

God no, it seems utterly bizarre to me. Alien, even.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 12:53 PM
1

I think this is a very American thing. Probably your collective protestant/puritanical past. Goes along with the fear/shame of nudity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 10:26 AM
20

"Men benefit greatly from this arrangement." They categorically do not. What benefits accrue? It allows us to devote time and energy to leadership positions in businesses and governments Most men live live lives of thankless drudgery - providing for others. The wives of those "in leadership positions in business and government" are not scrubbing floors, mate. Many are counting the days to a billion dollar divorce. We can't all be Senior Gender Advisor, Sebastián Molano (he/him) some of us have t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 09:06 AM
2

They've always been with us. Book burners. Sackcloth and ashes. Anabaptists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 08:23 AM
2

he's an existential threat and must be tarred as far right or alt right. I think you hit the nail on the head. They can't laugh at him, so they get enraged. "bog-standard conservative" Well, perhaps what a 'conservative' used to be. These days they are blustering clowns without an ounce of sense or intellectual power. But of course, conservative is not his profession or area of expertise. His area of expertise happens to lie right on the fault line of crank pop-culture invective, and having famo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 08:10 AM
2

What are your scientific credentials? Here's Petersons' citations. Also you misspelled misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 08:06 AM
13

Great until the gratuitous pop at eminent clinical psychologist, Dr. Jordan Peterson. It's so bizarre to see these tokenistic taboo people wheeled out to be burned in effigy every so often. But never actual bastards like Sean Hannity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/21 12:36 PM
2

For every incompetent dad on tv there is a strong father figure, or a complex character out there as well. There doesn't seem to be. In the arena of 'family shows' at any rate. If you're going to lump in say 'The Wire' or 'Game of Thrones' then it's not a fair comparison.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 09:12 AM
2

The Simpson's incredible success has made so many copycats that the (originally subversive trope) of Dad's being fools has become the accepted norm. The problem is that this is a sexist norm, like when women were depicted as shrieking airheads in movies of the 70's. It simply won't do to have fathers and men in general routinely depicted as sub-humanly stupid. People start to believe it's actually the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 09:10 AM
2

Exactly. It was playing against the Cosby type. But 20 years later that's pretty much the only type of father you see on TV and every family has to be dysfunctional to be 'hilarious'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 09:05 AM
2

Never argue with an idiot. Just tell them big girls can afford to buy their own drinks and wink. Try to be very handsome while doing this.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:20 PM
2

she tried to excuse it because she spends time dressing up and looking nice. Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:18 PM
6

feminists would lose their mind if it reversed They assume we do that. They also assume men's 'locker room talk' is as bawdy and explicit as their own. Pure projection. Most gym changing rooms all you ever here is talk about sport or DIY stuff.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:13 PM
1

Then they wank each other off about how bad each of their male partners are. It's the female version of the Yorkshiremen sketch. I don't go out drinking with 'the boys' anymore but when we did, there was never any off that crap, except a few of the lads explaining that 'she didn't like it when he went out'. And one by one we all stopped meeting up...
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:10 PM
3

I’ve not met many men who want to stay home with the kids if I’m honest... I know I sure as heck never wanted to. It's great. Lot's of free time. More engagement with the kids. More hugs. Shed super organised.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 01:08 PM
4

"we don’t peddle both sides-ism " - The 19th. Staff comprised of 100% Women - Maximum diversity!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 12:21 PM
3

nobody ever really discriminated against women in the workplace to begin with. Hard disagree. There was a lot of basically wrong assumptions about women's intelligence, fortitude and leadership qualities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 12:15 PM
5

Rosary
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 09:07 AM
22

I'm Irish - A 'true' feminist would probably accurately call this a 'patriarchal' holdover. Essentially women are still seen by the state as having less agency and as being more 'vulnerable' than men. They are viewed as a kind of quasi-child. You can see it in the 'reasoning' here: "It is valid to regard penetrative sex as being of a different degree of seriousness for the woman who is penetrated than for the man who penetrates" Why is it valid? No reason is given. It must be accepted simply as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 08:33 AM
5

Oh ya, I'm just taking their lowest possible figure and it's still... very common. Where do they get 'incredibly rare' from? To be honest it's not doing much for the negative generalisation of women being innumerate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 08:34 AM
18

Have you noticed that all talk of the 1% and class distinctions has fallen off the public discourse since shortly after 2009 and instead we've seen a huge rise in the internecine warfare of race, gender and other squabbles among the hoi poloi? Not to go completely tinfoil hat, but it doesn't cost THAT much to astroturf the likes of Reddit, Twitter and Facebook, particularly when you buy ink by the barrel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 08:31 AM
7

I find it amusing that they always use alt-right these days. Never just 'rightwing'. Sometimes extreme right. I'm not a communist, but a nanny state suits me just fine. I don't mind paying very high taxes to get a very high average standard of living. It's better for everyone that way. But I think men are getting a raw deal these days in a variety of areas. Suddenly I'm a free market capitalist? What gives?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 08:26 AM
50

Let's go with 2%. Is 2% 'extremely' rare or just rare? Is 2% even 'rare' at all? If a pharmaceutical had side effects that affected 2% of users, this would certainly not be classified as rare - which would require fewer than 1 in 1000 cases, but, clinically speaking, very common.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/21 09:31 AM
9

You're not wrong. Don't date in college. Don't get married and don't have kids. That's most of your major problems avoided. Or if you do get married, only marry a woman willing to financially support you to be a stay at home husband. Then endure the horror, the horror! of light home duties and raising kids in a loving and wholesome environment. Make sure to loudly complain at every opportunity how your 'unpaid work' makes you no better than slave while shopping for new clothes and meeting your f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/21 08:55 AM
1

My wife keeps leaving the seat in the toilet down - when I want it up!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/21 08:19 AM
3

but MRA's often dismiss them as just black issues Nope.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/21 08:18 AM
1

"as a victim". This victimology is getting out of hand when one can posit a whole cohort of people are "victims" without bothering to mention what it is they are victims of. Not that it's hard to imagine what black men in the United States might frequently be victims of - but this phrasing is woolly and imprecise. It makes 'victimhood' into some sort of inherant moral or spiritual condition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/21 08:16 AM
5

Anyone interested in the plight of poor and working-class men ...invites opprobrium and moral outrage. Are you saying men are 'the victim'? Guards! Seize him!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/21 08:03 AM
1

Gossip is when they spread malicious information designed to undermine someone's social standing. Don't agree that men own 'logic' Sure there are tendencies, but the way you've articulated it, sounds like absolutes. The occasional row is an emotional confrontation first an foremost. I've brought up old shit from time to time. And I've been persuaded by her logic (from time to time). Am I less given to appeals to emotion? Absolutely. Do I hold a grudge? Yeah I hold a grudge from time to time. Thi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/21 02:04 PM
3

A mans power comes from his physical prowess, where women’s power comes comes knowledge You can sharpen your own tongue too, you know. Self improvement doesn't have to stop at lifting weights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/21 09:29 AM
2

She probably got this from her parents. "men can be nagged, but they cannot acknowledge the nagging without being a sexist" Not true in my case. I made a metal note to recall several instances of nagging through the day and in the evening recounted them to her without being emotional about it. I explained it was bad for me, bad for her, and bad for the relationship. I also told her that my perspective was that this was just her brain on rails, riding along a track forged by the past, and that sh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/21 09:24 AM
2

"Teach Men not to rape!" "The future is female!" "Kill all men!" "Mansplaining" "Manspreading" "Manterruptions"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/21 09:16 AM
1

Piers Morgan is an absolute cunt, who used to be editor of several British tabloid newspapers, which are the world's worst newspapers. And he paid to have people's phones hacked.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 11:03 AM
6

Ever seen the price of a Gucci handbag? Or a Kendi one? Ever seen the floorspace taken up by women's stuff in a department store, compared with the floorspace taken up by men's stuff? I don't know if it's because women are inveterate consumers, or because they get advertised to more.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/21 11:43 AM
1

My thought is, this sub exists exactly because of people like her. But also this is adolescent.net so these are the ramblings of a child, aimed at other children, I guess.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 10:02 AM
1

I am not a 'rightwinger' but there are a cohort of people who consider people to the left of Karl Marx as "right -adjacent' if they don't buy into the CRT hocus pocus and other rhetorical tomfoolery. Maybe I'm right wing and don't even know it!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/21 04:27 PM
2

good stuff.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/21 02:04 PM
2

Lets say it's only 1% false accusations. Would you get on an airline where 2% of flights end in crashes? Would you take a pharmaceutical that has lethal side effects in 1 in a hundred patents? Would that be called "Rare"?
/r/MensRights21/05/21 10:53 AM
1

Most people wouldn't consider it 'shocking' anymore sadly. It's fairly typical of British universities now to assert the most extreme ideological rhetoric as settled fact and silence dissent.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 02:19 PM
1

"Women don't need to be attractive to be perfect wives and mothers"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 01:33 PM
1

Should Taxpayers be forced to pay for defence? Law enforcement? Jurisprudence? Why not education? A better educated workforce improves national GDP and competitiveness. As a non-American I'm happy to see America in decline and Korean school kids crushing it and taking all your jobs and industry. What goes around, comes around. But why do Americans like yourself welcome the progessively worse educational outcomes for your population? Do you hate America?
/r/MensRights17/05/21 08:34 AM
2

Men don't generally set women on fire, which is what you seem to be asserting by using the plural. Mostly we look after women and provide for them. Are you saying no woman has ever set any man on fire? Because apart from being an absolutely bizarrely specific accusation,I think you'll find egregious and horrific violence is not limited to the male of the species as the case I mentioned above, and thousands like it amply demonstrate. Are you a feminist might I ask?
/r/MensRights30/11/20 01:05 PM
3

Indeed, the very first coercive control conviction in the UK was brought against a woman who beat and tortured her vulnerable boyfriend with burning, scalding and starvation. She was sentenced to 7 and a half years. Over 40 percent of domestic violence victims are men. Yet there are few if any, services available to abused men and scant support for them in society. In fact most people, like yourself, don't believe they exist and even laugh at the concept.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 10:02 AM
2

She was in on the plan.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 08:43 AM
2

You're just arguing for the sake of it Jesus, that's rich.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 08:42 AM
1

Mens rights are a 'laughing stock' in academia because the prevailing radical orthodoxy in many institutions is so grossly sexist towards men, that any issue affecting men predominantly is either dismissed as 'men's fault' (problem solved!) worse, considered a heresy and those found guilty of such are fired, as with the Eton Teacher this week. Your comment amply illustrates that you are not arguing in good faith and are here with the sole objective of insulting and belittling those of us concern…
/r/MensRights30/11/20 08:34 AM
1

This women did not set the fire, nor did she come up with the idea of the fire. She was an accessory to this awful crime. Headline makes it sound like she burned the house down, when it was Mick Philpott.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 07:34 AM
3

It seems impossibly ignorant to look at the US or indeed any democracy on earth today and conclude that women are 'largely excluded' from power. We do not exist in a patriarchy, most of us are lucky enough to exist in a representative democracy with universal enfranchisement. Women hold many positions of power and have huge institutional clout. The only people 'excluded' from power are convicted criminals. Only a fantasist could conclude there is a tyranny of men in western democratic countries.…
/r/MensRights30/11/20 07:21 AM
2

Exactly. It's like the 'war on drugs' or the 'war against terror' an unending struggle against a nebulously defined issue with massive amounts of propaganda and demonization of the supposed enemy.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 09:54 AM
1

You can vote now.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 06:13 PM
1

I thought it was a pretty literate insult.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 10:21 PM
0

Are you Scottish? Hardly a hill to die on.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 08:22 PM
1

Good. Do.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 06:47 PM
-1

There is free soap and free bogroll. Providing razors would cost too much, I wouldn't be for that.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 06:44 PM
2

Good on you. It's not even being framed as 'humour' or anything. It's an appalling piece of demagogery by the Standard, but then that's their wheelhouse.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 03:37 PM
9

Just straightforward misandry. Since it's the UK she could conceivably have her collar felt by the long arm of the law on this to 'check her thinking'.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 08:10 PM
2

Nazis
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:25 AM
3

Look at the gender balance of the teaching staff. Still confused?
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:11 AM
1

Paywall
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:08 AM
5

Sly move, love it.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:02 AM
7

I don't like or support Tories in general, but you would NEVER in a million fucking years hear this from a labour MP. So good on him.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:01 AM
3

Cause waves man. Big waves. Drown those motherfuckers.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:53 AM
1

Try a lot of exercise. Try running 10k every other day. Helped me.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:52 AM
2

Interesting set of dads.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:50 AM
4

I support equality too. Let's reduce the number of homeless men down to the same as the number of homeless women. And reduce the number of men dieing at work to the same level as women. And let's see just as many dads retain custody of their kids as women in a divorce. And let's see boys do as well as girls in education, with just as many boys going to college as girls.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:35 AM
6

Prick
/r/MensRights20/11/20 08:32 AM
5

“This is not the time or the place” etc. only, it’s never the time and it’s never the place. Feminists on the internet are mostly just people who despise men. Their claims to the contrary are the purest bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:06 AM
1

Daaaam. Thats /r/murderedbywords for sure
/r/MensRights24/07/19 07:11 AM
3

No, bullets do.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 08:03 AM
1

So you use it to describe guys getting married? (Who obviously ARE ‘getting laid’) Makes no sense. Consider that you might be on the wrong tack here.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:23 AM
1

Then maybe OP should get his wife to work while he becomes the house husband amd take care of the kids. That way, the future ex wife does everything and OP benefits while not lifting a finger. Lol you ever try this? Are you married? I asked my wife if she would work while I would be the ‘primary caregiver’. No thank you! Men do not get the choice. Women do.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:20 AM
2

Theres no God but I agree with the rest of it. Social experimentation is all good and well when you’re young, but when the rubber meets the road, traditional values like fidelity, duty and honour have a purpose that has led to them being carried over from generation to generation. That said, don’t get fuxking married to any woman while the law makes her your master.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:18 AM
2

Are you married? Happily? For how long? Im in my early 50’s. 2 kids. I know a lot of married men. None of us would unwish our kids, we love them. But none of us would make the terrible mistake of getting married if we had to do it all over again. Better hope your wife/master is not a cruel one or you are FUCKED and you’ll never see your kids again.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:14 AM
2

Exactly. Change the law, or don’t move in together.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:10 AM
1

The issue is not women, or blue haired feminists, its the power of the state and the explicit misandry that has been interwoven into its assumptions and actions by a very large cohort of well meaning people who nevertheless have paved the road to hell. Compare the number of kids growing up in single households today with 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:08 AM
1

Once you are married the weilding of power and the facts of who has power, diverge. Over the years this dichotomy will change your relationship subtly. She can destroy you at any time for any reason, or no reason. And she has the backing and encouragement of the state. You do not. As far as they are concerned, you Exist only to provide.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:04 AM
0

To some extent that’s true. But the laws and practices around divorce are asymmetrical. There is no equivalent of state mandated indentured servitude for women. Marriage is asking the state to get involved in your love life and the state regards men as second class citizens now.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:00 AM
1

It could be. But let's be honest, it's almost certainly some sort of man-bashing metoo cash-in from Babs. It will be tedious and bland.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:39 PM
2

2 points. "otherwise the franchise would have tanked years ago." ​ The Franchise did tank years ago. The first Daniel Craig movie was a blast, but subsequent efforts have delivered diminishing returns. A retired Bond type plotline has already been tried with Licence to Kill. Despite Daltons' considerable charms, it was tiresome. ​ Secondly, The James Bond Character was always a male fantasy. A form of escapism for the everyday working man. Bond's life was full of luxury and foreign travel. Beaut…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:35 PM
3

These idiots don't know what the word 'patriarchy' means. To them it means whatever they want it to mean. You're watching the prattling of Youtube commenter levels of 'intelligence'.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 10:25 AM
2

I made no such claim. But I will now: Trump stated that he loves torture and would torture the families of terrorists. He asked what the point in having nuclear weapons is, if you can't use them. He alluded to not supporting NATO members in the event of their being attacked - which materially makes a nuclear war more far likely given Putins proclivities. He instiuted a no-tolerance policy on the border allowing toddlers to be taken from their parents. 7 kids have died in his concentration camps …
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:04 PM
2

What claim are you talking about?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:50 PM
2

We're done here. You make me sad.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:44 PM
-1

Well, hopefully less. He is at an advanced age, after all.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:44 PM
2

You can compare any 2 things.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:15 PM
1

You my boy, are in desperate need of a good education. Unless this is a joke. Because it seems a bit like a troll.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:15 PM
5

Indeed why not. But notice that when there is a lack of women in a particular field much support is given to 'even the playing field'. In the case of education - even bringing up the problem merits accusations of "misogyny".
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:02 PM
4

Women will vote for 'bad men'. No I don't think Trump is as bad as Hitler. He still has a year to go though..
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:00 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist_feminism ​ https://isreview.org/issue/100/marxist-theory-womens-oppression
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:56 PM
2

Seriously, where have you been? Read any gender or feminist sub. It's all about the Marxism, baby.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:55 PM
0

Learning that simplest of geometric theorems is very important and is one of the foundations of becoming numerate. It's also very handy in DIY. You may as well say there's no point in learning to read big words.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:52 PM
3

Their plan is "The future is female".
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:39 PM
5

I don't see marchés or protests You do see marches and protests and then you see them being shamed or shouted down by feminists. You see speakers getting disinvited. You see fire alarms being pulled and airhorns being set off.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:38 PM
5

Most of the money goes towards lavish salaries for administrators.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:33 PM
1

Good solution.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:32 PM
11

Lotta women voted for Trump. Lotta women voted for Hitler too, now that I think about it.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:31 PM
4

I think I should be asking why aren't more men interested in education? Why aren't more women interested in STEM? ​ Should we address the problem in the same way? Write it off as 'systemic sexism' and impose quotas?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:28 PM
5

Whens the trip to a creche where 95% of people in the field are women?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:20 PM
1

#Meeetoo Mark.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:04 PM
6

The "Good German".
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:52 AM
2

It's almost a blackmail - ​ It's tantamount to racketeering.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:49 AM
3

Racketeering refers to crimes committed through extortion or coercion. A racketeer attempts to obtain money or property from another person, usually through intimidation or force. The term is typically associated with organized crime. The law defines 35 different offenses that constitute racketeering in the U.S. The RICO statute expressly states that it is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the subsections of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962. The government need not prove that the defendant…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:45 AM
1

"this mistake is deliberate and is being made in bad faith" I agree somewhat. It's rhetorical combat and some are weaponising those terms to foster a narrative for sure, but I think most people use words like that out of pure ignorance and a desire to seem well read. There's a more sinister dimension creeping in of late however. I liken it somewhat to arguments about Israel/Palestine. People who argue that the actions of sucessive Israeli governments are war crimes often are subject to accusatio…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 03:09 PM
8

The fact that the group is not its most extreme and vocal exponents is uncontroversial. However I believe misandrists DO represent feminism, literally. They represent it in newspaper columns - very few of which are moderate and fair to men. They represent it in institutional power, particularly in third level education and family law where you see men treated abysmally by powerful 'feminists' with a chip on their shoulder. While they do not represent the average person who calls themselves a fem…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:10 PM
3

True. But many of them ARE monsters who are apathetic to the plight of men. A great many.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 04:06 PM
2

We know.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:42 PM
4

The abstract contains this: 'discourses that reinforce alt-right ideologies.' ​ Since 'alt-right' is jargon that means anything you want it to mean, this paper is trash. Ironic, for people supposedly studying linguistics. ​ However the paper also says that /r/mensrights is more anti-feminist than pro-men. Yes, I would agree it is. What of it? The inference is that feminism is an unalloyed 'good' and any objection to it is 'misogyny' as if objecting to the Ku Klux Klan would be somehow 'anti-whit…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:17 PM
1

Not wanting to be around women is 'creepy"? I thought creepy meant 'physically unattractive". No? All evidence says yes.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 02:26 PM
1

They are being satirical. Men are told we can't have any opinion on what some women regard as "women's issues" such as abortion.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 02:38 PM
2

Fight CLub
/r/MensRights04/06/19 11:55 AM
3

Antifa are Fa
/r/MensRights04/06/19 11:42 AM
9

Who signed the bill into law? A woman. Who proposed the bill? A woman.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:27 AM
19

Jill's all for maiming them too right?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:24 AM
15

What sort of coerced medical procedure should pro life women suffer, Jill?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:19 AM
1

It's starightforwardly a hate sub. Where do you report hate subs?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:18 AM
1

Zealots just mark dissent as 'abuse' and lazy mods autoban. They don't have a culture of tolerance for men's opinions.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:09 AM
1

What I'm alluding too is their propensity for banning any dissent.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:21 PM
1

Touche
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:48 AM
-1

My point is, it's not a game at all.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:58 AM
2

Watch out, you could be banned for asking that. Oh wait, this isn't 2x...
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:57 AM
1

I've seen that definately. Metoo was feminism jumping the shark.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:11 AM
1

If they were more actually liberal that would be great. They come off as more authoritarian, far LESS liberal and far more into punishment and see freedom of speech as a danger, not a right.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:10 AM
-1

Well the sub sure isn't fine - a lot of those guys remind me of early radical jihadists. The philosophy is one of defeat. "I'm just going to walk away" is just taking the ball and going home. I can't agree with that as a solution to the problem. I do agree that there is a problem for sure.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:07 AM
0

Move to New Zealand.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:01 AM
6

Who will downvote her for being a woman? That's not the kind of behaviour I see here generally.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 11:19 AM
3

No, just break up.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 11:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter