TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

frodegar Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by frodegar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

"I could put in a good word for you with my friend at MIT if you like. By the way, Lou Gehrig's disease doesn't affect sensory nerves, not that that's at all relevant."
/r/MensRights16/02/26 05:08 PM
5

A few years ago I worked for a woman owned company. It was founded by a married couple. The wife owned 50%, the husband owned 49% and the husband's mother owned 1%. It's just a way to get some tax benefits and good PR.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 05:12 AM
3

Yeah, all them ****** are just looking for handouts. I can't even walk down the street anymore! But not you. You're one of the good ones.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 03:26 PM
3

according to this it's 60% of net.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:20 AM
47

The maximum amount that can be taken by federal law is 60% of net pay. Take home should be about $280 minimum, which is still really low. I don't know what's going on here, but we aren't getting the full story.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:16 PM
5

Is that new though? If Rory and Amy's genders were reversed, Amy's treatment of Rory could have been the subject of an abuse PSA.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 02:48 PM
2

It only applies to publicly traded companies. When you go public, you sell part of the company, so you're already sharing your success in exchange for sharing the risk.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:32 PM
0

The picture on the left has softer focus and is lit from all angles by diffuse light. On the right, he's pumped, oiled, and flexing while lit from the front from an undiffused light source. Those pictured may as well have been taken an hour apart and that includes time for the haircut.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 05:58 AM
2

I'm going to take a somewhat opposing view. You are both welcome to do whatever makes your relationship work, whether that's hugs and kisses or open warfare. Doing that in front of close friends who know you and understand the context is also fine, but doing it in front of others is extremely disrespectful, and gives people a negative impression of both you and your husband. Obviously you aren't being abused, and if this is what makes your marriage work, then don't change, but there's a time and…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:49 PM
1

Health insurance plans will be forced to include contraceptives in their coverage, but health care costs actually go down when birth control is included. In other words, you will actually be paying less than you would be if contraceptives were not covered but nothing else was changed.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 02:46 AM
3

Those statistics consider non-use to be a form of imperfect use. They also don't take into account the frequency of sexual activity.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:02 AM
1

The failure rate of 10% is per year is based on a couple claiming to use condoms as their primary means of birth control when condoms are used improperly. Non-use is considered a form of improper use. In other words, if you always use one and use it properly, (pinch the tip, roll it on, don't double up, don't use petroleum based lube, store it properly, etc.) you will be just fine. The way failure rate is measured makes no sense at all. I think it's done that way so that meaningful numbers can b…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:59 PM
4

Imagine you've fallen over a cliff, and you're hanging from a tiny ledge. There's a hungry tiger at the top, and jagged rocks hundreds of feet below you. The ledge is starting to give way. Next to you is a bush growing out of a crack in the rock. On that bush grows a single strawberry. Eat the strawberry. Life is pain. With strawberries!
/r/MensRights23/12/11 01:20 PM
2

in many American states, a child can actually be left/abandoned by the mother at any hospital/fire station (or similar) right up until they are of adult age That was one state, in an unintentional loophole that got closed fairly quickly.
/r/MensRights19/09/10 08:33 AM
2

The title is: Father Craig Roper blasts Scissett Baths' changing room rules The swimmer is a father of three. The headline seems a bit prejudicial to me.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 07:37 PM
1

In MA, recording a conversation without consent is a felony.
/r/MensRights18/01/10 06:50 AM
1

Her testosterone levels were found to be within the range considered normal for a woman. I think that a standard should be established and that any disqualification based on that standard should be done before the competition. It is unfair to Semenya to let her compete, then disqualify her after she wins based on something she had no knowledge of.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 10:00 AM
1

It's a matter of figuring out where to draw the lines, not one of eliminating them or putting them everywhere. If I understand you correctly, it would be fair for men to win 95% of all co-ed races, but unfair for heavier men to win 95% of all wrestling and boxing matches. You believe this out of a sense of fair play.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 09:47 AM
1

Yes. Establish rules under which one group will win almost exclusively, then call it fair because the rules are followed. That's fair. Should I assume you favor the elimination of weight classes in wrestling and boxing as well? How about elimination of vehicle restrictions in NASCAR? Let's eliminate all scholastic sports as well. If a seven year old soccer player can't block a goal kick from a healthy adult, that's his own problem. Fair's fair, right? You know, maybe that guy with the carbon fib…
/r/MensRights13/09/09 08:51 AM
1

A woman with that build may be more likely to be genetically male, but it doesn't necessarily follow that such a woman is cannot exist. Even if such a woman is extremely unlikely, we're talking about professional athletes. In the range of human physical ability, every single one of them is a statistical outlier.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:00 AM
1

Does the sports world have any kind of consensus as to what constitutes a male and what constitutes a female? Surgical alterations should clearly be discounted, but barring that, do they follow genetics, external anatomy, internal anatomy, or some combination? It seems to me that it makes the most sense to just go with external anatomy. Is the athlete an innie or an outie? Imagine if this person, who has lived as a female all her life, continues to live as a woman, but for purposes of her contin…
/r/MensRights13/09/09 02:41 AM
1

Is it fair to the other women, to make them compete against someone who has a body more like a man's? In a competition that's all about physical ability? If she had the same physique, but she was genetically female as well as physically, why would that be more fair?
/r/MensRights13/09/09 02:21 AM
1

THAT is fair. So what if males would dominate over females in everything but rhythmic gymnastics and figure skating. I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 02:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter