TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fryelosopher Archive

View 1 posts and 19 comments by fryelosopher on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

fryelosopher/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 07:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't think it's a matter of life experience. I just ended up commenting below a person who made it their main point. I dunno. I could work to support the statement if I had to. Obviously, if a person has well-adjusted morals and principles, you'd want them to hold onto those in most situations. What these discussions have taught me is, apparently I believe even morals and principles are relative to the circumstance. No one set of morals or principles will serve you well in all situations. I j…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:19 PM
1

You think stifling anger/rage at the sight of seeing a child (your own child?!) raped is a good move? Those emotions are there for a reason, to get you to do something. I would hope you and anyone else would do something. If you went to far with what you did, just like the court in this case, I would not hold it against you. In that moment, it doesn't make sense to expect a fully rational being. I would expect an animal reaction.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:13 PM
1

Haha, yeah. I agree. I am, a little. Maybe this will help you see where I'm coming from. Have you see Logan? Who would you rather have as a parent, in the moment you found yourself being raped or murdered: Wolverine or Caliban? Logan: Crazy yelling and a claw through the rapist's head. Caliban: Wondering what to do, standing there. Maybe wincing at the sight of it. Maybe a cry out for someone else to come help. I'd say Wolverine. Sure, there are more balanced responses. Those are preferred. But …
/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:09 PM
1

As far as judgement, I'd agree. I wouldn't want the heavy hand of judgement coming down on someone on behalf of a society or a god and it be purely emotional. The process of bringing justice about, judging guilt and all of that, has to be detached and logical and factual. But as individuals we aren't held to that standard. We are allowed to act quickly and emotionally. And sometimes, that's a good thing.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:20 PM
0

Aren't those both easy actions?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:17 PM
1

Doing the right thing in line with your morals even when it's hard is at the heart of integrity. It's generally a good thing to have. I guess I got away from the root comment with my post. I'm not sure broad or narrow life experience is the most important factor at play here. So I step away from what that other dude said a little. It's the proximity to the shit situation I'd rank up at the top. If Joe Blow's kid gets raped, the impact on me is lessened by distance and time. Easier to apply ethic…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:51 PM
-3

Maybe, usually, purely emotional decisions are foolish. I'm a bigger fan of logic than emotion as well. I prefer ethics over YOLO mindsets. But I think emotions have their place, their purpose. They drive us to react immediately to a circumstance--and some circumstances need immediate action. Rage and bloodlust make sense to me in reaction to a person's kid being raped in front of them. Stifling those emotions in that case might not be in your kid's best interest. Might be against your own best …
/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:31 PM
48

The thing is, they would likely only tell you rehabilitation trumps ending a life if it wasn't their family member who was beaten, tortured, raped, murdered or whatever. It's just easier to take the high road when it isn't directly impacting you.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:36 PM
1

This is an issue at the heart of journalism today. Some think journalism is at its best when it is rooting out corruption or advocating for one thing or another. Some think journalism is at its best when it only supplies the closest approximation to truth, or 'here, this shit happened and here is what we know.' These two goals do not mix well. So here we have an organization which officially pursues truth journalism, but reaching out with feminism-based advocacy journalism when it sees fit. Orga…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 03:13 PM
1

I get what you are saying. As a knee jerk reaction I would question the same thing - freedom of speech is one of the things I value most. But, there are limits to our freedom of speech. One of the clearest out-of-bounds speech type is a call to action which puts people at risk. A common example is, you can't yell "Fire! Run!" in a crowded theatre. It seems innocuous, but it puts people at risk like Walmart opening its doors on Black Friday morning. I would wager the lawyers working to prove guil…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/16 01:06 PM
2

The entire article feels like the exact opposite of victim blaming... What would that be? Culprit Consenting? It's excuse after excuse, deflecting blame/responsibility away from the person under investigation for (suspected-ly) murdering her male children for attention, and away from the system which placed these children back in the care of a suspected murderer. The first paragraph of the story is one big excuse for her actions: "A mother accused of killing her three sons was dominated and isol…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 01:51 PM
1

I had a similar epiphany back when Skyrim came out, when I was about to begin a graduate degree. "Why am I making this false me learn all of these things, develop all of these skills? The real me is just sitting in front of a television." It seemed absurd that I would put work into finding success in a virtual world, with no real gains outside of unlocking different layers of coding. Especially when I had let my real self go so much in these pursuits. Skyrim, as a game, took me away from my frie…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 02:46 PM
1

I won't lie. A part of me wishes I had impregnated every DNA-worthy woman I have slept with. Having a large impact on the gene pool, and passing on my family name and DNA all seem like things I want to do but I learned to know better than to do.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:09 PM
1

I probably need to go in and extract all the insight that expresses the Red Pill's perspective here. This definitely fits in. I appreciate it. It actually makes me want to ask more questions, which is neat. Is fatherhood a goal of TRP, or is spreading your DNA/progeny effectively a factor anywhere? I can easily see alpha behavior jiving well with the goal of effectively producing offspring, and actually, biologically, that might the natural drive for what is ultimately expressed as alpha behavio…
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 02:05 PM
1

If it were happening, I'm not sure we'd have smiling and probed babies to show for proof. Where would you even get proof? Does some organization keep tabs on abortions across the board? Do the doctors or patients have to report it? All outside of my knowledge.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 11:00 PM
1

"Does the legality of abortion on net benefit me or not? If it does, then I should work to defend it. If it does not, I should work to undermine it." This is viable insight, and is what I want to encounter here. Self-centered and self-serving ethics and morals and values are still ethics and morals and values. My personal response to this prompt would be: it depends. If it's my child, I would work to undermine the legality of abortion if I wanted that child. If it is not my child, it is of no co…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 10:55 PM
1

Does TRP attempt to understand what is right or wrong behavior in certain circumstances? It seems to. Some people use it as a compass to guide behavior (I do not). That it dictates right and wrong, or ideal behavior, makes it in part a moral issue. Does decision making which is informed by TRP Impact people outside of the person acting and deciding? Yes, and so it is in part an ethical issue. I am not after any ideal on a universal level, only ideals according to this ideology/theory/body of kno…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 10:50 PM
1

I think I can stand behind that being the insight granted here. But I see TRP as something that reaches out beyond the scopes of its original application. It's practical application is where it all began - the being happy with your love and sex life as a male thing. But it also makes use of a unique set of values and morals and ethics and theory, and those are the things I'm interested in.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 09:39 PM
1

But The Red Pill is a perspective, a body of knowledge at this point. What I am wanting is an analysis of abortion from the perspective granted by TRP. This seems like a viable thing to pursue. Something being an ethical issue does not prevent it from also being a moral or practical issue. It, likewise, does not prevent it from being analyzed from a Red Pill perspective. In truth, TRP has its own set of ethics and morals and practical applications, and THOSE are what I am after. Just like someon…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter